Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive/2024/09

2024

01 September 2024

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP user keeps removing a lot of content from the talk page. Btspurplegalaxy 💬 🖊️ 09:33, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. IP user has been blocked by PhilKnight. Report to AIV if they resume. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:26, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Launchballer 10:21, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: Potymkin (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for 48 hours. Daniel Case (talk) 20:32, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IPs disruptive edits. Jingiby (talk) 11:26, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 185.100.244.0/24 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. from article for three months. Daniel Case (talk) 20:36, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Stop IP edits made to add false information helping scammers impersonate the brand 147.161.234.174 (talk) 08:25, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 21:52, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing from multiple IPs. Annh07 (talk) 06:19, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Going to indef; this has been going on forever 2600:100C:B043:2526:EDCB:DC50:798:9769 (talk) 15:44, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The history is ridiculous 2600:100C:B043:2526:EDCB:DC50:798:9769 (talk) 15:44, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Steven Walling • talk 00:32, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There's an IP changing editor that keeps changing the outcome. Perhaps a temporary edit protection makes it clear this won't work. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 07:14, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And again, another one. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 12:53, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. If possible, the IP user could be engaged on talk. —Ganesha811 (talk) 23:45, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The article was protected for WP:EW. A discussion was open in the talk page to try to see if a consensus was possible. However, just like before, as soon as the protection was over, the article was edit by the person engaged in the previous EW. Despite having it's multiple IPs blocked, the problem persists. No discussion will be able to go forward as long as the WP:status quo of the page is respected and the IP has shown no interest in respect it or the consensus policy. Coltsfan (talk) 12:27, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already done by administrator Acroterion. Steven Walling • talk 00:49, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing & BLP violations by IP editors. Bgsu98 (Talk) 13:41, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 01:00, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Socking 107.77.195.70 (talk) 14:00, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 01:03, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Constant disruption to vandalise the article cognitive nerative as obvious the intruder were always an unknown ip address in this case caste motive conflict of intrust you can see interaction timeline [1] >>the first attempt to vandalise the article integration 59.89.22.144 (talk) 14:41, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will also leave CTOPS notice on talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 01:05, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – multiple disruptive edits from socks, possibly by UAK, over a long period of time. ZZZ'S 17:15, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. We can allow the constructive IP edits this way; also the article isn't getting disrupted too much. Daniel Case (talk) 01:18, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – For at least a month. Kailash29792 (talk) 17:31, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Steven Walling • talk 01:18, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Target of registered and IP socks of User:MariaJaydHicky over the last week or so. Aoi (青い) (talk) 18:28, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 01:20, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I'm involved in the SPI for WP:LTA/Andrew5, and have been (and will almost certainly continue to be) targeted by their socks. The last several revisions have been back-and-forth reversions of my WP:DENY removal of a comment thread over the SPI by new or IP socks and good-faith autoconfirmed / extended confirmed editors. GeorgeMemulous (talk) 18:32, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Can re-request if abuse persists after protection exprires. Steven Walling • talk 01:26, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent disputing going on at the moment due to the release of Alien Romulus, there is a talk page discussion but IPs not paying attention. Darkwarriorblake (talk) 19:02, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 01:35, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: too many vandalism. BlueSpectre5 (talk) 20:16, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Too much vandalism 2600:100C:B043:2526:EDCB:DC50:798:9769 (talk) 00:58, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 01:38, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing from multiple IPs. Annh07 (talk) 06:29, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Steven Walling • talk 00:33, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term IP vandalism. Skitash (talk) 10:01, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Steven Walling • talk 00:35, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Every now and then, some random IP (probably the same person) comes and alter the sourced Infobox result from "British victory" to "Iranian/Persian victory". This has been ongoing since at least August 2023 [2]. HistoryofIran (talk) 21:26, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 01:40, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Paul Vaurie (talk) 22:39, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 01:44, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple template-editor creation protected non-template or module pages

Indefinite full creation protection: Template-editor protection is mostly used on templates and modules per WP:TPROT, and because most deleted and repeatedly created non-template or module pages are instead fully, extended confirmed or semi salted or creation protected. PK2 (talk; contributions) 07:28, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined This makes no sense. Bbb23 (talk) 00:46, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism. Amigao (talk) 14:26, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 00:48, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Fathoms Below (talk) 20:03, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 00:50, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The page has since been moved to Bash in Berlin since I made that report, for reference. Someone should probably review the report below this one. Fathoms Below (talk) 00:54, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Andrew5 socks seem to be disruptively editing the page. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 16:09, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 12.246.51.122 (talk · contribs) blocked by Zzuuzz. for a year. It has also been globally locked for a month. Daniel Case (talk) 01:12, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: WP:LTA/Andrew5 promised to continue socking this page until it's protected. See here. GeorgeMemulous (talk) 18:29, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This seems like one of the very, very, very few times CRASHlock is justifiable. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 18:32, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Steven Walling • talk 01:20, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked: 12.246.51.122 (talk · contribs) blocked by Zzuuzz. for a year; the IP is also globally locked for a month. Daniel Case (talk) 01:31, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Growing/persistent disruptive editing, such as adding citations needed to a lead section (goes against the order/manual of style), as well as removing parts of the infobox. Noorullah (talk) 00:01, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Given how new the article is, I'm not seeing a lot of disruption yet as a portion of the total edits. I will put a CTOPS notice on the talk page, though. Daniel Case (talk) 01:46, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Target of registered and IP socks of User:MariaJaydHicky over the last week or so. Aoi (青い) (talk) 18:28, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Daniel Case. Favonian (talk) 08:14, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. General Ization Talk 04:26, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 08:30, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – LTA target. Mtarch11 (talk) 05:03, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ad Orientem. Favonian (talk) 08:14, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent Disruptive editing disruptive editing Growing persistent disruptive editing such as adding citations needed to a lead section goes against the ordermanual of style as well as removing parts of the Info on the Page fixed it so many times and IP users keep changing it users doing this as well Mikey551415 (talk) 04:43, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined @Mikey551415: It looks like disagreements are being sorted out on article talk as they should be. Johnuniq (talk) 08:34, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism Theonewithreason (talk) 06:23, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 09:19, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – The show is currently premiering, the participants list is secretive and is fully revealed in the premiere by 10 PM IST 1 SEPT 2024, however IPs are found to be adding so called leaked, predicted participants, this may continue till today's premiere completes. Hence semi-protection atleast for 24 hours requested to avoid unsourced and predictive additions to the article. Thewikizoomer (talk) 06:50, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 09:16, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: The company now likely meet WP:GNG due to new developments since 2015. A number of reliable sources now cover the studio: [3][4][5][6][7][8]. A redirect to Koch Media or Embracer Group, or the creation of a new article is now likely. OceanHok (talk) 06:17, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotected – There's currently a Draft:Vertigo Gaming, which seems to be about the same company. If it can be improved to the point where it passes WP:AFC, it can be moved to article space. Favonian (talk) 08:38, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: High-risk template – Transcluded through Template:Taxonomy/Archaeplastida on all plant articles. Recent addition to the phylogeny, so the estimated number of transclusions given by the script (15,000) is much lower than the actual number (as all templates transcluding Template:Taxonomy/Archaeplastida also transclude this one). Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 14:32, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected indefinitely. Favonian (talk) 16:19, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism by Indonesian troll 3skandar (talk) 14:46, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 16:21, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I want to improve some content from Imran Khan Prp people (talk) 11:15, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Talk:Imran Khan is not protected. Favonian (talk) 12:37, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This page needs protection because of vandalism Prp people (talk) 14:07, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 16:56, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: (The redirect, not its target): The page was preemptively protected without prior deletion in logs. No prior history of vandalism. Requesting extended confirmed protection or autoconfirmed protection as WP:Featured articles is autoconfirmed-protected. 2003 LN6 07:02, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Weak oppose: There is no reason for anyone to be editing it. I got into something like this when I tried to request the removal of the protection for 9/11 (the redirect, not the article). However, I could potentially support reducing it to ECP to change it slightly faster in case the template gets deprecated. For now I oppose however. CharlieEdited (talk) 00:02, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support A page shouldn't be protected just because "there's no need" to edit it. In this case, reasons to edit it could include, say, improving the WP:RCAT if better categorization templates are found. If there is no apparent reason for either protection or editing, full protection should not be the default. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 14:41, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Unprotected, gingerly. Redirect shortcuts are lower risk than templates (see WP:HRT) as they do not transclude their content, which makes me err towards lower protection levels. A similar shortcut with similar page views and similar-ish links is WP:GAN, which is not protected. I will put this on my watchlist. Sdrqaz (talk) 17:40, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I am requesting it here first since the admin who protected it passed away. Protection has been ongoing for nearly 7 years, which is definitely long enough for at least a trial run of no protection. Plus, page views are quite low and edits are infrequent, making it probably not much of a target for the average Wikipedia user. I support no protection but if vandalism ramps up again I would also be fine with PC. Semi is probably overkill but I would be somewhat fine with it. Edit: Linked to redirect by accident CharlieEdited (talk) 23:59, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That page is a redirect. Do you mean Texas Revolution? Daniel Case (talk) 01:49, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. CharlieEdited (talk) 03:33, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Unprotected. I'm doubtful about the supposed lack of page views as it seems to have had 23,500 in August 2024, but it has been some time since the protection and edits are pretty infrequent after all. Sdrqaz (talk) 17:40, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IP over a newly released film. Charliehdb (talk) 09:57, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Discospinster. Favonian (talk) 18:09, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 17:54, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 18:08, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Skitash (talk) 18:12, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 18:16, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalism. Seyamar(245CMR)💬📜 09:39, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Warnings have been given; a single disruptive user doesn't justify protection. —Ganesha811 (talk) 16:02, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent addition of contentious material by drive-by IPs which has picked-up in recent months. The edits remain unaddressed and unexplained. A mid-term PP is needed on what is a perennial attractor of bad-faith actors (as witnesses by the page's history). Gotitbro (talk) 10:38, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Issues are compounded by the fact that the term (or rather its acronym CECA) is also being used as a racial slur ([9]). Gotitbro (talk) 14:54, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 19:04, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued vandalism of contentious article by IP and new editors. Sciencefish (talk) 12:01, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will leave CTOPS notice on talk. Daniel Case (talk) 19:12, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: CTOPS. Israel-Palestine. Borgenland (talk) 13:35, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 19:16, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. SleepDeprivedGinger (talk) 15:02, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 19:21, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Dieter Lloyd Wexler 18:27, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 19:29, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Addition of unsourced content/unexplained removal. Thanks. C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 18:55, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 19:31, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism by unregistered users in recent days. AideDésintéressée (talk) 19:00, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Upgrading from PC. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 19:24, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Repeatedly recreated by well-meaning users despite AfD consensus for it to be a redirect until the election. Full protection could be a good way to avoid people wasting time on recreating the article before a consensus is established for notability. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 14:29, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined A good thought, but doesn't meet the very high bar for imposing full protection. GoodnightmushTalk 18:28, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Serious edit war. JacktheBrown (talk) 16:49, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. GoodnightmushTalk 17:55, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. GSK (talkedits) 20:29, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 20:45, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

02 September 2024

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. C F A 💬 19:09, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined for now. There's some engagement on the talk page now, so hoping this won't require admin intervention. If it does, probably can start with a block, not protection. GoodnightmushTalk 19:33, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP Vandalism An guy with one grammatical error (talk) 08:33, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 09:04, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP Vandalism An guy with one grammatical error (talk) 08:33, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 09:04, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Possible future target for IP Vandalism An guy with one grammatical error (talk) 08:34, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Lectonar (talk) 09:04, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP editors continually add an image of a human foot to the infobox, claiming (with no evidence) that it is Lardner's foot. DH85868993 (talk) 10:17, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 10:33, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Edit war. JacktheBrown (talk) 16:51, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined I don't see any evidence of an edit war here. GoodnightmushTalk 18:01, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There's an obvious edit war going on. what do you mean there is nothing? Zlad! (talk) 21:09, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Zlad!: exactly! JacktheBrown (talk) 06:26, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. If an edit war, it's a slow one. If we would protect, we would need to protect fully....frankly I don't see the need for that yet. Lectonar (talk) 10:03, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Edit war. JacktheBrown (talk) 06:24, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. If an edit war, it's a slow one. If we would protect, we would need to protect fully....frankly I don't see the need for that yet. See above, there was another request for the same page. Lectonar (talk) 10:04, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism on the talk page. GnocchiFan (talk) 08:20, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined See Wikipedia:ATPROT, disruption not heavy enough. Lectonar (talk) 10:11, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP Vandalism An guy with one grammatical error (talk) 08:35, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 09:52, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Could become a target for IP Vandalism An guy with one grammatical error (talk) 08:36, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Lectonar (talk) 09:53, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@An guy with one grammatical error: Please have a thorough read of our protection policy if you haven't done so already. Lectonar (talk) 10:06, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations – Page is being vandalized/inflammatory content added again by IPs. Paris1127 (talk) 20:45, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done I've semi-protected the page for two weeks due to BLP issues (extended confirmed is not nessecary at this time). If they continue to be an issue after the protection expires, ping me and I'll extend it. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 16:11, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Actually I'm going to change it to pending changes for six months because it looks like people are consistent in making the problematic edits over a period of months even if it isn't constant. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 16:15, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Edit war by [10]; this is the same IP that was blocked yesterday for "edit war" ([11]). JacktheBrown (talk) 06:37, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This does seem to need protection, and I'm possibly involved. Valereee (talk) 16:20, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I hope that a reasonable consensus can be reached on the talk page for how to go forward in that time. GoodnightmushTalk 16:40, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Repeatedly recreated spam by Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/IndeedJob. C F A 💬 14:32, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. Valereee (talk) 16:24, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing and persistent IP edits changing Nanchang to Hong Kong despite no sources provided, and no findable evidence to support claims, not to mention the clear proof to the contrary from pre-existing source, and from the manufacturer's website stating JMEV is in Nanchang in no uncertain terms. Zinnober9 (talk) 04:33, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 15:37, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP Policy Violations. Editing based on player transfer rumours. WP:BLPGOSSIP, WP:NOTCRYSTAL. Ken Tony Shall we discuss? 18:40, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Joyous! Noise! 19:06, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I enquir about myself 2600:6C46:6E00:B:F0A2:EB1E:982E:4567 (talk) 11:10, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged per WP:AUTOBIO and WP:COI. Zinnober9 (talk) 14:31, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This request cannot be actioned.Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 17:07, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not unprotected because there is nothing to unprotect. New editors should submit drafts for review. See WP:AFC for instructions. ~Anachronist (talk) 17:23, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:PIA. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 01:20, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already done by administrator EdJohnston. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:19, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Consistent edit-warring between registered accounts. LR.127 (talk) 16:53, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already done by administrator NinjaRobotPirate. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:06, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of ip vandalism,[[12]] warned on their tp, continues to vandalise the page Theonewithreason (talk) 18:01, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Joyous! Noise! 19:18, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing by IPs, with low levels of editing otherwise. Replicative Cloverleaf (talk) 18:55, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Joyous! Noise! 19:04, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – nazi flags. soibangla (talk) 20:45, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Muboshgu. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:11, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

03 September 2024

Reason: Incredibly high level of vandalism, misinformation, or just bad edits. Not a week goes by without someone either adding "pro-Russian" in the infobox, removing Euroscepticism and replacing it with pro-Europeanism, or vandalizing the article by calling the party a "Russian Dream" or its founder "Borys Ivanishvili". I think this easily warrants extended confirmed protection as it is a very contentious article about a very controversial party and protection will save it from being stuck for hours with vandalism until someone notices and reverts. Zlad! (talk) 20:44, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please invoke WP:CT/EE. IanDBeacon (talk) 15:45, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Left CTOPS notice on talk. Daniel Case (talk) 03:09, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: BLP policy violations – IPs making unhelpful edits to the page of a public figure. Pending would allow helpful edits through while restricting gossip/vandalism. Paris1127 (talk) 20:49, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. To get through the election, at least. Left CTOPS notice on talk. Daniel Case (talk) 03:12, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Per WP:ARBPIA. 🛧Midori No Sora♪🛪 ( ☁=☁=✈) 20:59, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 03:14, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Per WP:ARBPIA. 🛧Midori No Sora♪🛪 ( ☁=☁=✈) 21:38, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 03:18, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 01:10, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Joyous! Noise! 23:33, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing by IP editors. Bgsu98 (Talk) 20:21, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Joyous! Noise! 20:35, 2 September 2024 (UTC):[reply]

Reason: Repeated unproductive IP edits 162 etc. (talk) 22:48, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 03:23, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The experiment of this page being unprotected has failed as the edit warriors and vandals have since returned. The idea of a topic regarding the far-right not being CTOP is clearly short-sighted here overall. CNC (talk) 23:08, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:PIA. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 00:13, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 03:24, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Hi, I'm renewing page protection for this month due to WP:VANDALISM and WP:CRIT. The Vice President of the Philippines Sara Duterte, is involved in several controversies, and her articles are prone, and bias. An IP user edited the name 'Shimenet' into Sara Duterte's article.

(For the context: The term 'Shimenet' related to VP Sara Duterte has become controversial and is often used in memes on social media, particularly following a Senate Hearing where she had a arguments with Senator Risa Hontiveros. Royiswariii (talk) 04:56, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 03:33, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Unfortunately, someone is still trying to add defamatory contents that violate WP:BLP. It might appear well-referenced at first, but if you take a closer look you'll see that the text is poorly written, negative in tone, and that the references are bogus (duplicates, Russian-language unreliable sources, web archives, blog-based content, paid attacks, and even English-language sources that discuss the subject completely differently from how the article does). It has also triggered the "possible BLP issue or vandalism" tag, see [13]. Originally, this was all added by an autoconfirmed SPA sock account (Special:Contributions/Παλαβός) which has now resumed the edit warring. I suggest that the edits be reverted and the page be bluelocked to prevent future BLP violations. Thanks. 2A02:8308:F:9900:DC4C:EE8E:F4F:471A (talk) 06:31, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ymblanter. For three days. The edits reverted were made before that. Daniel Case (talk) 03:39, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing; WP:CASTE. Ekdalian (talk) 11:41, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at WP:GS/CASTE. Daniel Case (talk) 03:42, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I am writing to request the semi-protection of the "Association of Malayalam Movie Artists" article. The page has become a hot topic recently and has been repeatedly targeted by vandalism. Despite a previous protection request that was granted, the protection lasted only a couple of days, and the vandalism has since resumed.

Given the article's current relevance and the frequency of disruptive edits, I believe that extending the semi-protection would help maintain the integrity and reliability of the content. A temporary protection period of 2-4 weeks should suffice until the topic cools down. Kaeez06 (talk) 13:25, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 03:46, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing name vandalism from multiple IPs. gobonobo + c 23:43, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 03:52, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent IP edits repeatedly changing pronouns despite warnings. Has been protected previously for same reason. StewdioMACK (talk) 04:49, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Addition of unsourced content again and again by IPs. M S Hassan 📬✍🏻 11:23, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 04:11, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruptive editing. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 13:07, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:13, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Constant IP infobox vandalism (adding extraneous/incorrect detail). Nate (chatter) 16:19, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will log at CTOPS under WP:CT/CID. Daniel Case (talk) 04:19, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Requesting semi following sustained vandalism and brigading. ~ Pbritti (talk) 16:52, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:25, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I've noticed that some edits from IP address users have been affecting the constructive development of the page. I've encouraged these users to participate in the Talk page discussions to share their perspectives and collaborate on making positive contributions, but they are failing to do and continue with their un-constructive edits. ReillyVega (talk) 17:11, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:28, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated removal of sourced content. Trailblazer101 (talk) 21:38, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 04:33, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent addition of unsourced content to redirect, following Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hung Cao (2nd nomination) in July. Wikishovel (talk) 21:46, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing by IP editors. Adding unsourced genre and removing sourced genre without explanation. This has been going on since the article's creation. Here are a few examples: [14], [15], [16], [17], [18] Shout4Serenity (talk) 22:23, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. However, this will not come without noting that a) you could have warned them in some form other than edit summaries, and b) "we can do this all day buddy" is more befitting an IP that gets blocked rather than a Wikipedian. Daniel Case (talk) 04:40, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Unfortunate abbreviation has resulted in high Battle-for-Dream-Island-related vandalism; last incident was on August 30; was unable to figure out if the Commissioner is aware of this 134.22.84.45 (talk) 23:48, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 04:43, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. related to some mod for Hearts of Iron 4 Daisytheduck quack quack 00:24, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:45, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Multiple violations of WP:LISTPEOPLE on the artist section by multiple IP users in the past month. Jalen Barks (Woof) 03:53, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 04:53, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalism. Needs protection ASAPMikey551415 (talk) 04:21, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article redirect continued to be reverted back to a full scale article despite a successful deletion nomination and the original concerns not being addressed at all. Hariboneagle927 (talk) 04:05, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 04:55, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Please consider page protection downgrade to Pending changes protection, there's no IP edits that are vandalism. 14.0.225.7 (talk) 04:10, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. It was your own disruptive edits from multiple IP addresses that caused this protection to begin with. Pending-change protection would simply create work for other editors if the disruptive activity resumed. And disruption isn't the same thing as vandalism. ~Anachronist (talk) 04:46, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please don't assume or accuse any editors to be disruptive. According to the Wikipedia:Protection_policy#Comparison_table, Semi-protection is only appropriate for pages that have been persistently vandalized by anonymous and registered users. All users should be free to edit, when there's no vandalism activity going on. AN INAPPROPRIATE PROTECTION IS A DISRUPTIVE ACTION. 14.0.225.7 (talk) 05:09, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 07:07, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repated violations of WP:NOVELPLOT by IP-hopping editor. DonIago (talk) 03:39, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2601:547:1583:4450:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for a week. Daniel Case (talk) 04:08, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent IP vandal 81.199.149.194 -- Pemilligan (talk) 16:25, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. I have already given them a level one. Daniel Case (talk) 03:48, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Major figure in the 2024 US presidential election not to have their page ECP'd. And it would be wise to do so for the next several months. Qutlooker (talk) 23:46, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It’s also to prevent sockpuppets of the banned user Buzzards-Watch Me Work from editing it 2603:8080:D03:89D4:F983:A52F:F09D:6622 (talk) 00:58, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Daniel Case (talk) 03:54, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. General Ization Talk 03:35, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 03:56, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection. Frost 13:46, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 114.10.103.179 (talk · contribs) blocked by HJ Mitchell. for a month. Daniel Case (talk) 04:15, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – IP socks of User:SHUBHAM788 at work adding unsourced genre "action thriller film" en masse in many articles. Digg for this one, as well as other articles [19], [20], [21]. If possible please protect those articles as well. Thanks. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 14:20, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2409:4089:2D48:B892:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Ad Orientem. for a month. Daniel Case (talk) 04:16, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block evasion by User:Giubbotto non ortodosso using IPs from Italy. Binksternet (talk) 17:25, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 5.90.136.0/21 (talk · contribs) blocked by Ohnoitsjamie. from that article for a year. Daniel Case (talk) 04:31, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Addition of poorly unsourced content/false information. UndergroundMan3000 (talk) 01:44, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Seems to be mainly one user over a span of one day. I advise warning the user appropriately, and consider bringing it to WP:AIV if they continue. GeorgeMemulous (talk) 01:47, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Declined That was done, and the report was declined as they had made no edits since being warned. Daniel Case (talk) 03:06, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The same user just vandalized this page again and is doing this to several other pages such as Candlebox and Skid Row. UndergroundMan3000 (talk) 04:03, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have given him his last warning. If someone else had done that before, I could have blocked him. Daniel Case (talk) 04:47, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked: 71.91.161.144 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for 24 hours after he (unsurprisingly) ignored that last warning. Daniel Case (talk) 04:59, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent attempts by the same user to vandalize this page for months - ever since the page was unlocked from last year, when it was locked due to high vandalism. Soon after it was unlocked, user "TBurnout" engaged in new attempts started to undo legitimate sources. The same user persistently posts "failed verification" and undoes legitimate, highly-credible links (i.e. links to national newspapers and the Government of Canada House of Commons) added to the page in order verify its content. Belladonna2024 (talk) 03:24, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Daniel Case (talk) 04:50, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 03:43, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 04:51, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — GhostInTheMachine talk to me 07:06, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 07:08, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — GhostInTheMachine talk to me 08:22, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2a02:c7c:c44c:1600::/64 (talk · contribs). One month. Favonian (talk) 08:38, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Recently, the page has been subject to multiple edits by IP users who are adding false information. These edits have included the insertion of a fake person's name under the "Key People" section and listing countries where Trade Republic does not actually operate.

These misleading edits are not only spreading inaccurate information but are also leading to potential scams. Users who come across this incorrect information might be deceived into thinking they are interacting with the official company, which can result in significant financial and reputational harm.

Given the potential risks to the public and the repeated nature of these malicious edits, I believe that page protection is necessary to ensure the integrity of the information presented and to prevent further harm. You can check my user/email to prove legitimacy. Trade Republic (talk) 10:25, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. Issue is the unsourced addition of a non-notable (and possibly inaccurate) staff members name. I seriously doubt there's any "risk to the public" but the to and fro of reverting is mildly disruptive so on balance have added a short semi-protection. There are also problems with the OP's username which I'll take to their talkpage. -- Euryalus (talk) 11:12, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Fourth time asking for protection. people keep adding a hoax name. I am requesting for INDEFINITE protection. IP trolls are not going away and probably won’t for an extremely long time. A few months of protection won’t cut it anymore because i’ll be back here -1ctinus📝🗨 11:14, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 11:46, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Vacant0 (talkcontribs) 11:55, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. Lectonar (talk) 13:16, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Fathoms Below (talk) 13:04, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 13:16, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Continuing IP disruption, I requested this before but Daniel believed there wasn't enough warranted activity yet. Seeing how this is continuing and yet another editor has reverted the IP, I think a protection is in order. Noorullah (talk) 11:51, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Disruption still isn't heavy enough to warrant protection; OP: please read our protection policy if you haven't done so already. Lectonar (talk) 13:18, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP vandalism hamster717🐉(discuss anything!🐹✈️my contribs🌌🌠) 12:17, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Thanks for bringing this up; as it is, the threshold for protecting talk-pages is generally higher than for other pages like articles, e.g., so one instance of disruption makes it not necessary to protect it. And we have a talk-page which is watched by plenty of administrator to boot. Lectonar (talk) 12:55, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 16:47, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 16:55, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A globally locked and indefinitely block in EnWIki LTA with undisclosed paid edits continues to turn articles into a news dump from various IPs. Please protect the articles due to constant sockpuppetry. If need information on what the LTA it is, I can provide it to CUs, or ping Bbb23, because you know who is that. --Mykola7 (talk) 11:16, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done, the first one for two weeks, the second one indef Ymblanter (talk) 20:05, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant attacks by Piermark socks. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 17:12, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 20:14, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Page target of disruptive editing due to recent news relating to game, likely requires short period of protection. Rambling Rambler (talk) 17:37, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 20:11, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. General Ization Talk 18:02, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I've partial-blocked the /64 for a week, and invited them to discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Please let me know if problems continue. Joyous! Noise! 19:15, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Done Ymblanter (talk) 20:22, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Waxworker (talk) 06:30, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 20:23, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism of a Transgender Paralympian. Qwerty123 (they/them) (talk) 08:42, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 20:25, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations – As noted on the talk page, the contentious topics procedure applies to the article. M.Bitton (talk) 10:34, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I came here to request protection, but I see you noticed that new accounts and IPs are at it again before I did. TarnishedPathtalk 10:40, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator SarekOfVulcan. Ymblanter (talk) 20:28, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: CTOPS RUSUKR. Borgenland (talk) 15:05, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected Ymblanter (talk) 20:21, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Waxworker (talk) 15:16, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 20:18, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IPs. Charliehdb (talk) 15:27, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 20:17, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs and new accounts persistently changing figures without any source. Shubhrojeet (talk) 10:56, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected Ymblanter (talk) 20:30, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Multiple IPs and non-autoconfirmed users disruptively editing the article. Replicative Cloverleaf (talk) 11:31, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 21:56, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
CTOPS notice left on talk. Daniel Case (talk) 21:57, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – As per every other article on this matter. RodRabelo7 (talk) 13:10, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 22:01, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Speculations resumed immediately after the last protection expired. Jalen Barks (Woof) 14:42, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 22:10, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Regular vandalism from TherealBengal and his IP's.–𝐎𝐰𝐚𝐢𝐬 𝐀𝐥 𝐐𝐚𝐫𝐧𝐢 ʕʘ̅͜ʘ̅ʔ 16:50, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 22:14, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 18:22, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 22:18, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Someone with a possible COI has been adding unsourced content to this article ever since I created it 10 years ago. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 21:34, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 22:23, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism/unproductive edits with BLP concerns McPhail (talk) 22:23, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Left CTOPS notice on talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 22:27, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

04 September 2024

Reason: Vandalism by anonymous ips (probably the same person as these ips) Dipper Dalmatian (talk) 09:23, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think here blocks need to be handed out. Ymblanter (talk) 20:27, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked: 2001:8003:AC05:FA00:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for two years. Daniel Case (talk) 21:52, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism 97.78.224.183 (talk) 18:22, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ymblanter (talk) 20:06, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Proxy IPs, likely LTA 1319. theinstantmatrix (talk) 00:11, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 00:43, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated BLP vandalism Orchastrattor (talk) 21:27, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. One edit today after nearly two months with no edits whatsoever. Daniel Case (talk) 22:19, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 04:32, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Cullen328. Favonian (talk) 05:16, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I request to edit this article because there are not any articles that match this category Marklawrence2601 (talk) 07:12, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not going to happen.Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 18:27, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not done. Wrong venue. You'd have to convince the community at MediaWiki talk:Titleblacklist that the blacklist entry should be removed. ~Anachronist (talk) 05:55, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism by a user using multiple IPs vandalizing the page to show as if communist parties like the German Communist Party and the Marxist-Leninist Party of Germany won. Hlsci (talk) 09:53, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 09:56, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism by a user abusing multiple IPs to show as if communist parties like the German Communist Party and the Marxist-Leninist Party of Germany won. Hlsci (talk) 10:01, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 10:38, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism by a user abusing multiple IPs to show as if communist parties like the German Communist Party and the Marxist-Leninist Party of Germany won. Hlsci (talk) 10:04, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 10:39, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism by a user which has previously abused other IPs and vandalized other articles about German politics by showing as if the Communist Party of Germany won by 99.5%. Hlsci (talk) 10:20, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 10:40, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 10:21, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 10:41, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistently vandalized by a user which has previously abused other IPs and blocked twice today and vandalized other articles about German politics by showing as if the Communist Party of Germany won by 99.5%. Hlsci (talk) 10:22, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 10:41, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalized by a user which has been blocked twice today, abused multiple IPs, and vandalized other articles related to German politics by editing as if the Communist Party of Germany won by 99.5%. Hlsci (talk) 10:25, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 11:23, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistently vandalized by a user which has been blocked twice today, abused multiple IPs, and vandalized other articles related to German politics by editing as if the Communist Party of Germany won by 99.5%. Hlsci (talk) 10:29, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 11:23, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalized by a user which has been banned more than twice, abused multiple IPs, and vandalized other articles related to German politics by editing it so it redirects to Gulag. Hlsci (talk) 10:35, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 13:36, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple attempts at vandalism, appears to be a campaign over multiple German political articles. Ygolygydd (talk) 11:33, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 13:36, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Several IP addresses -who might be the same one using entirely different addresses- keeps on editing the page adding very biased feelings about criticism of this music genre. Calls people who dislike deathcore "elitist", not only is this very emotionally fueled but also unsourced. Edits have been reverted for the last several days and it doesn't seem to ever stop. Lil Sad Lil Happy (talk) 11:43, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 13:35, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Massive disruptive editing Wikibear47 (talk) 13:06, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This article was protected two and a half weeks ago. That’s enough 2600:100C:B0AC:8464:9434:2773:98C4:AA38 (talk) 13:24, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 13:30, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 06:13, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 13:50, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term disruption by someone who thinks that calling a German company "Turkish" because it was founded by people with Turkish roots is the pinnacle of humor. IceWelder [] 07:05, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 13:48, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Disruptive editing. A bunch of new accounts and IPs keep adding "(and concord)" to the premise section in reference to the game being shut down. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 08:47, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 24 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 13:47, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — GhostInTheMachine talk to me 09:01, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 13:46, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistently vandalized by a user which has been banned twice today, abuses multiple IPs, and vandalized other articles about German politics, by editing it to redirect to Adolf Hitler. Hlsci (talk) 10:33, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 13:37, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

05 September 2024

Reason: High level disruptive edits. Mehedi Abedin 03:00, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed Mikey551415 (talk) 04:03, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 14:00, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page was left in a vandalized state for 3 months. Frost 04:10, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 24 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 13:59, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Kovcszaln6 (talk) 13:37, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 14:06, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This was declined twice before, with reasons to not warranted activity, but now theres an effective edit war of me and another user reverting an IP, there is imminent protection required now, please see the page history for the back and forth. Noorullah (talk) 23:08, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 20:59, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – IP edit-warring to insert preferred version of plot summary details. DonIago (talk) 23:11, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined for now. It looks like a productive discussion is taking place on the talk page. Also, it seems like the IP is editing against consensus, so not really an EW. GoodnightmushTalk 14:04, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Since Md Al Islam Hamza blocked, various IPs are coming in and whitewashing the page. Happening at least once a day. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 00:18, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:03, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Jalen Barks (Woof) 04:41, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Joyous! Noise! 15:34, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — GhostInTheMachine talk to me 06:12, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Just one IP. No disruption since the only warning they received. Ping me if a block ends up being necessary, but that would be the next step, not protection. GoodnightmushTalk 13:55, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Anon IPs are trying to close this AfD in violation of WP:NACIP. LibStar (talk) 09:35, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined for now. It's a little bit of work to revert, but it's only 2 NACIPs so far and it'd be ideal to keep this discussion as open as possible. Feel free to ping me if it gets worse. GoodnightmushTalk 13:40, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism. Xexerss (talk) 12:34, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Just one IP and they haven't edited since their last warning. Feel free to ping if it continues and I can block them. GoodnightmushTalk 13:33, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Disruptive editing and also revision history mostly filled with bunch of reverts. Paper9oll (🔔📝) 12:58, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Just the one IP in the last 5+ weeks. GoodnightmushTalk 13:32, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent IP vandalism. Zingo156 (talk) 13:41, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 14:08, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended protection: Persistent Vandalism. Lorry Gundersen (talk) 13:47, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 14:08, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Claimed by Cambodia PhilTheGreatLOL (talk) 15:16, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. Joyous! Noise! 15:25, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Frost 15:16, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of four days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Joyous! Noise! 15:20, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Continued disruption after protection expired. – sbaio 17:27, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Academic Challenger (talk) 21:15, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: GA – Persistent bad edits by unregistered users. Will be more in the coming days with the next England national football team matches. AideDésintéressée (talk) 18:51, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 20:56, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: persistent IP vandalism, despite multiple attempts to tellSeyamar(245CMR)💬📜 19:04, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 20:54, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP vandalism on page changing boxoffice and budget numbers and using unreliable blog sources. RangersRus (talk) 19:12, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 20:11, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This was declined twice before, with reasons to not warranted activity, but now theres an effective edit war of me and another user reverting an IP, there is imminent protection required now, please see the page history for the back and forth. Noorullah (talk) 23:08, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 20:59, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – IP edit-warring to insert preferred version of plot summary details. DonIago (talk) 23:11, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined for now. It looks like a productive discussion is taking place on the talk page. Also, it seems like the IP is editing against consensus, so not really an EW. GoodnightmushTalk 14:04, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Since Md Al Islam Hamza blocked, various IPs are coming in and whitewashing the page. Happening at least once a day. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 00:18, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:03, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Jalen Barks (Woof) 04:41, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Joyous! Noise! 15:34, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — GhostInTheMachine talk to me 06:12, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Just one IP. No disruption since the only warning they received. Ping me if a block ends up being necessary, but that would be the next step, not protection. GoodnightmushTalk 13:55, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Anon IPs are trying to close this AfD in violation of WP:NACIP. LibStar (talk) 09:35, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined for now. It's a little bit of work to revert, but it's only 2 NACIPs so far and it'd be ideal to keep this discussion as open as possible. Feel free to ping me if it gets worse. GoodnightmushTalk 13:40, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism. Xexerss (talk) 12:34, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Just one IP and they haven't edited since their last warning. Feel free to ping if it continues and I can block them. GoodnightmushTalk 13:33, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Disruptive editing and also revision history mostly filled with bunch of reverts. Paper9oll (🔔📝) 12:58, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Just the one IP in the last 5+ weeks. GoodnightmushTalk 13:32, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent IP vandalism. Zingo156 (talk) 13:41, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 14:08, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended protection: Persistent Vandalism. Lorry Gundersen (talk) 13:47, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 14:08, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Claimed by Cambodia PhilTheGreatLOL (talk) 15:16, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. Joyous! Noise! 15:25, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Frost 15:16, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of four days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Joyous! Noise! 15:20, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Continued disruption after protection expired. – sbaio 17:27, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Academic Challenger (talk) 21:15, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: GA – Persistent bad edits by unregistered users. Will be more in the coming days with the next England national football team matches. AideDésintéressée (talk) 18:51, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 20:56, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: persistent IP vandalism, despite multiple attempts to tellSeyamar(245CMR)💬📜 19:04, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 20:54, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP vandalism on page changing boxoffice and budget numbers and using unreliable blog sources. RangersRus (talk) 19:12, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 20:11, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason:Persistent Disruptive editing disruptive editing Growing persistent disruptive editing such as adding citations needed to a lead section goes against the ordermanual of style as well as removing parts of the Info on the Page fixed it so many times and IP users keep changing it users doing this as well. Disputes and disagreements keep occurring time to protection to be added. Mikey551415 (talk) 04:11, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: High-risk template – Used by Substituted into template-protected templates, like {{Yes}}. George Ho (talk) 07:02, 4 September 2024 (UTC); edited, 19:24, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 01:50, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. FMSky (talk) 15:33, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 01:58, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism immediately resumed after previous protection expired. Skywatcher68 (talk) 18:02, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Kinu. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:12, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: CTOPS. Mother article Timeline of the Israel–Hezbollah conflict (2023–present) was split so also request protection for other branches, namely:

Borgenland (talk) 15:48, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. All. And logged at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 02:23, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Leonidlednev (T, C, L) 17:15, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:29, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article is attracting hoax content from an Argentinian IP-hopper (two different IPs since 31 August). Skywatcher68 (talk) 17:28, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:31, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Continuous vandalism and POV editing over many years, which had a spike in the last week. Ymblanter (talk) 20:09, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please enforce WP:CT/EE, and possibly others. IanDBeacon (talk) 00:19, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 02:36, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of unconstructive edits by IP users. Whenever the edits are undone or reverted, the IP users just get right back to it. Requesting maybe a week of protection. MannysMyName (talk) 21:08, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:42, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High risk of IP vandalism due to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and ongoing war in Gaza. MagyarNavy1918 (talk) 21:30, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 02:44, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2603:8080:D03:89D4:ECA5:4658:4484:BF34 (talk) 21:35, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:52, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2603:8080:D03:89D4:ECA5:4658:4484:BF34 (talk) 21:36, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Upgraded from existing indef PC ... it was not enough anymore. Daniel Case (talk) 02:56, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent sockpuppetry. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TyMega. HorrorLover555 (talk) 21:58, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 02:59, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Violations of the biographies of living persons policy. Daisytheduck quack quack 22:29, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Joyous! Noise! 23:54, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level ip vandalism with unsourced and unreliably sourced changes and pushing to not keep neutral tone for controversial subject. RangersRus (talk) 00:07, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will also leave CTOPS notice on talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 03:01, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Potentially as a precaution, since User:Memevietnam98 appears to be persisting in restoring copyright violations. ⸺(Random)staplers 02:57, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. They stopped after their last warning about 18 hours ago. Daniel Case (talk) 01:42, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Untamed1910 (talk) 04:15, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. All of the IPs used. We should not semi-protect this page for very long if we decide to ... see logs. Daniel Case (talk) 01:48, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended protection: Persistent Vandalism. Need an Extended Confirmed Protection due to this page is claimed by Cambodia and reference from Angkor Wat's statue as Kun Khmer. PhilTheGreatLOL (talk) 15:30, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. No disruptive edits in almost a month. Daniel Case (talk) 01:54, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 00:29, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 03:08, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Persistent vandalism – Edits by extended confirmed socks. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 15:11, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It was just about to make this requets let me add more background about this place
For the past 8 months, the History of the chair has been vandalized by 4 Chan trolls removing information about chairs in sub-Saharan Africa, saying they didn't have any until Europeans gave it to them. I have made 2 reports in the past and gave proof of Africans having chairs before Europeans came, Which was supported by mods and added to the page debunking that claim,and gave proof that the attacks were coming from 4chan. It was given semi-protection(first report), which didn't stop them, And then later, given extended projection (second report). Even with this, they still find a way to bypass it and edit the page. It is also now being attacked by a well-known extended-confirmed sock abuser who dates back to 2007!, which is this guy.Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Hamish Ross
My pass reports about it, This page has begin protection 8 times it should get Indefinite Full protection at this point
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1157#c-Nil Einne-20240530003900-Developed it entirely-20240530001300
https://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=prev&oldid=1226339864 Developed it entirely (talk) 00:35, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. All socks, and globally locked. With one exception that I know of, we do not put articles on indefinite full protection. Not without an extensive discussion. Daniel Case (talk) 01:53, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
extensive discussion? where would I go to make the case for it? like every two days a new socks just pops up. Developed it entirely (talk) 02:25, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism by ip user. ModdiWX (message me!) 15:50, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please enforce WP:CT/GENSEX IanDBeacon (talk) 20:12, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked: 2600:1016:B123:E315:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Favonian. For 72 hours. Daniel Case (talk) 02:25, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
CTOPS notice left on talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 02:26, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended protection: Persistent removal of sourced content and violation of contentious topics policy (Wikipedia:Contentious topics/Arab–Israeli conflict) by user who then started trolling on my talk page.[22] Red Phoenician (talk) 18:20, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Daniel Case (talk) 02:32, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There has been persistent vandalism over the past few days. Steelkamp (talk) 03:27, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Aoidh (talk) 10:10, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 05:36, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Aoidh (talk) 10:11, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Mass Vandalism Fragrant Peony (talk) 05:52, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Aoidh (talk) 10:11, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

kalki 2898 collected 1158 cr not 1028 cr its not 5th place DollarAD2500 (talk) 10:35, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have a reliable source for this? Daniel Case (talk) 22:29, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Can't be added without source. Lectonar (talk) 06:38, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Untamed1910 (talk) 04:03, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Yamla. Favonian (talk) 17:25, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The article was protected until 4 September 2024, post removal of protection, IPs resumed attacking the page. IPs are adding false eviction/winner statuses to the contestants whom they probably like/dislike. Eviction happens on Sunday and is secretive and kept secretive until the Sunday premiere. To avoid such and other false and unsourced additions. Requesting semi protection atleast until 31 December 2024 because the show conducts around 105 episodes every year, hence by the assumption the show should be ended around 31 December 2024. Considering the persistent disruptions by IPs requesting the protection. Thewikizoomer (talk) 07:15, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also, eviction etc. happens on weekly basis until the season ends. Thewikizoomer (talk) 07:15, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Aoidh (talk) 17:58, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – I protected this page for two hours, despite being WP:INVOLVED, due to frequent vandalism and BLP vios. I would like uninvolved input on either reversing or extending my protection. This article's subject is in the news right now, and the article sits at the junction of both the BLP and American politics contentious topics (+ a little Russia-Ukraine mixed in now). Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 18:15, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Firefangledfeathers. For the bot. Favonian (talk) 18:35, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Favonian, did you look into this? Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 18:41, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @Firefangledfeathers: Of course not ;), but now I have. Favonian (talk) 18:58, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 18:59, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Disruptive IP-users have returned to this article again (after the end of previous protection). Addition of unsourced content, original research, and unhelpful changes/removals. Mann Mann (talk) 15:08, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Only 1 or maybe 2 disruptions in 2.5 months since protection ended. GoodnightmushTalk 16:30, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 17:36, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Low frequency, long term spamming. Favonian (talk) 19:16, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Gotitbro (talk) 18:17, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 19:11, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IPs adding unsourced content, started again as the previous protection expired earlier Today. Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 16:46, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 20:33, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 17:35, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 19:49, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Users with COI trying to remove anything vaguely negative and turn it into a promotional piece for the company. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 19:47, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., let us start with the semi-protection Ymblanter (talk) 20:28, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

06 September 2024

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Borgenland (talk) 10:49, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 00:39, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Bunch of IPs (possibly a single user but I am unsure) engaging in random content removal and edit warring. AntiDionysius (talk) 11:29, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 00:44, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Please protect for a month to minimise the disruptive editing at the article for the rest of the season (as per my previous request). 4TheWynne (talk contribs) 12:07, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 00:51, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

He HAD (not has) a pet cat named Niblo (2009 - 2022), which he adopted in Budapest. Jobraith (talk) 20:34, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment: The talk page is not protected. You should make a request there. - Sumanuil. (talk to me) 00:49, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not done – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. The article just got protected, but Talk:Anthony Hopkins isn't. Remember to include reliable sources for the demise of the feline. Even if they aren't covered by our policy regarding biographies of living persons, sources are required. Favonian (talk) 18:31, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. HurricaneEdgar 12:42, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Most edits are from established editors; this shouldn't be too much of a problem as the story/storm develops. Daniel Case (talk) 01:02, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: There is a lot of IP vandalism and the addition of awkward information Dushnilkin (talk) 12:59, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 01:34, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Never ending alteration of sourced info. HistoryofIran (talk) 14:13, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will put CTOPS notice on talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 01:42, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing and sockpuppetry – Blocked user MariaJaydHicky using multiple accounts for genre warring in the article. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 14:31, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 01:47, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level vandalism. Mehedi Abedin 15:10, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will leave CTOPS notice on talk since this is partly over the infobox. Daniel Case (talk) 01:50, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The article is being vandalized. A full cleanup is required

1)http://en.m.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=Vinesh_Phogat&diff=prev&oldid=1244185029

2)http://en.m.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=Vinesh_Phogat&diff=prev&oldid=1244180041

3)http://en.m.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=Vinesh_Phogat&diff=prev&oldid=1244184947

4)http://en.m.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=Vinesh_Phogat&diff=prev&oldid=1244174430

5)http://en.m.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=Vinesh_Phogat&diff=prev&oldid=1244170253

Hu741f4 (talk) 15:17, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Vinu. For a week. Daniel Case (talk) 01:52, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Aintabli (talk) 15:41, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will log at CTOPS under ARBKURD. Daniel Case (talk) 01:54, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – After the protection expired recently, the vandalism (about the player club) is back. Alexcalamaro (talk) 16:42, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:02, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Currently a dispute over adding publisher parameters to citation templates. It is being discussed at my talk although other editors have continued to revert while the discussion is ongoing. Some protection may be in order. Trailblazer101 (talk) 20:30, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:10, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Continuous creation of topic sections that are unconstructive, poorly-written and forum-like. SleepDeprivedGinger (talk) 20:35, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:12, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: More disruption again hamster717🐉(discuss anything!🐹✈️my contribs🌌🌠) 22:05, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:23, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Two editors have been going back and forth since June. Either this article needs a week of full protection, or some heavy warnings need to be given out. But it needs to stop. Fyunck(click) (talk) 22:26, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:25, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Dieter Lloyd Wexler 22:58, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:28, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Waxworker (talk) 23:41, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:31, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent Disruptive editing disruptive editing Growing persistent disruptive editing such as adding citations needed to a lead section goes against the ordermanual of style as well as removing parts of the Info on the Page fixed it so many times and IP users keep changing it users doing this as well. Disputes and disagreements keep occurring time to protection to be added.. Protection was added for 3 weeks but was removed by someone for whatever reason Mikey551415 (talk) 01:04, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:12, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Already protected by administrator Daniel Case. Yes, me. I semi-protected the article yesterday; it will remain protected until the 26th. There have been minimal edits since that protection.
    Also, the article had never been protected before; as for it being removed, well, three weeks is one of the options we have, so it probably just expired.
    More to the point, it sounds like you are getting confused here. Are you talking about another article? Daniel Case (talk) 02:35, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism and sockpuppetry. Skitash (talk) 01:07, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ad Orientem. for a week. Daniel Case (talk) 02:36, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Long term edit-warring dynamic ips and inexperienced editors. --Hipal (talk) 01:28, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 02:40, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of original research by anonymous editor. Ken Gallager (talk) 12:11, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. 2409:4073:200B:A8F6:293C:B4C8:B5CC:BCD4 (talk) 12:31, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Past instances of transphobic vandalism including dead-naming the Author of the webcomic 2601:586:8201:5750:39F1:DFDF:DB8C:A279 (talk) 22:03, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will also log at CTOPS under GENSEX. Daniel Case (talk) 02:17, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... IanDBeacon (talk) 05:11, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent adding either unsourced or poorly sourced material by sock hopping IP addresses. There are numerous IPs that have made edits and I'm certain one of them is the same person as they all come from Santa Cruz. In fact, a year ago I requested that page be protected because of a particular editor making similar edits.[23] Now it looks like that editor is making edits while logged out. Kcj5062 (talk) 13:57, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 181.188.160.0/19 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. from article for a week}} Daniel Case (talk) 01:40, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Disruptive editing - the same user who vandalised the page with my Care Bears fan shows in the past has been vandalising the page again after the six month protection expired. Refuses to listen even after I posted a talk page post. Luigitehplumber (talk) 17:41, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 86.15.45.211 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. from the article for three months. Daniel Case (talk) 02:06, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High risk of IP vandalism due to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and the Israel-Hamas war. MagyarNavy1918 (talk) 20:19, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is not clear to me that this is a CT article. Hillel International is not protected either. Ymblanter (talk) 20:25, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Just created today, in any event. Daniel Case (talk) 02:07, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I would like to request protection for this page due to ongoing issues with persistent vandalism. Multiple anonymous or unregistered users are frequently adding and removing information, much of which is unsourced and unreliable. Despite efforts to revert these changes, the disruptive edits continue to occur at a high frequency, undermining the page's reliability and integrity.

I believe that semi-protection would help prevent further disruptions and allow for constructive, cited contributions from established editors.

Thank you for your consideration. Krishnpremi (talk) 21:33, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Article hasn't been edited at all in six days. For disruptive edits you have to go back even further. Daniel Case (talk) 02:13, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Empty Legacy section ThatTechGuy2008 (talk) 19:55, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done I've removed that empty section. If that's not what you had in mind, please read WP:ER for instructions on how to make an edit request. OhNoitsJamie Talk 20:07, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank You. ThatTechGuy2008 (talk) 20:14, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 05:21, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Mike Allen 22:27, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 02:27, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Edit warring about the number of sales Trade (talk) 01:36, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 02:44, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism by IPs. Borgenland (talk) 05:38, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 12:40, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constantly being vandalised by IP editors and new users (probably kids). Obvious target for vandalism and hate speech. It was protected for two days last November and then immediately started to be vandalised again. IP editors have no need to edit the category. Mclay1 (talk) 11:00, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done (as WP:GENSEX). El_C 12:44, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There seems to be perpetual pointless IP fiddling going on on this page - and it's impossible to tell when the last good edits were. Golikom (talk) 05:50, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. About 80% of all edits to the page are by IPs, and at a cursory glance (me not being knowledgeable about the topic at all) I see no obvious vandalism. Lectonar (talk) 09:49, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued vandalism by IPs, possibly the same user. —Bruce1eetalk 11:55, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 12:56, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism from IP accounts, such as blanking pages. JustARandomEditor123 (talk) 12:39, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 12:47, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The entire article has been vandalisied, nearly every other sentence now contains propagandist and historical revisionist claims, all of which quote a "source" that provides absolutely no mention of their wild claims. Iceylore (talk) 09:25, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Lectonar (talk) 10:27, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: BLP violations. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 10:18, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. GoodnightmushTalk 14:27, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent vandalism after expiration of protections. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 13:18, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 13:39, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Two reasons after Daniel Case had changed protection to auto confirmed: (1) WP:ARBEE due to Russo–Ukrainian War and (2) WP:ARBPIA under the scope of the 2023 Israel–Hamas War as evidenced here. 70.51.215.103 (talk) 03:19, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't put it on ECP since a) it's not directly relevant to the Israel-Hamas war, and b) while it undeniably touches on RUSUKR that is not the central focus of the article; it's considerably broader. Daniel Case (talk) 19:11, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – basis for ECP upgrade not clearly outlined (volume of disruptive or otherwise contested edits by non-WP:XC users of restricted subjects). El_C 12:51, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Revdellable material repeatedly posted in Hindi. Giraffer (talk) 12:08, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. GoodnightmushTalk 14:35, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant attacks by HoY. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 13:25, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 14:35, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Recurring and persistent unexplained and frivolous changes to height and/or weight from IP editors. It is not a constant issue, but it has flared up in the last few days. I believe temporary semi-protection is warranted. Mungo Kitsch (talk) 07:35, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. But if it gets any worse, just ping me and we can semi or pending protect. GoodnightmushTalk 14:37, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – This article has been repeatedly created by users with a conflict of interest, in violation of WP:COIEDIT/WP:PAID. Additionally, the subject appears to have questionable notability, so it should follow the AfC process. GSS💬 17:01, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 18:15, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Please see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bobanfasil, socks persistently gaming autoconfirm. Wikishovel (talk) 17:06, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 18:19, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Temporary semi-protection. High level of disruptive editing from various IP addresses. Barry Wom (talk) 08:00, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 18:23, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High levels of Wikipedia:Vandalism and misrepresenting sources, or removing text, or edit warring in the page Gowthamaprabu (talk) 10:52, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Logged as enforcement for WP:CT/IPA. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 18:28, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. IanDBeacon (talk) 12:19, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 18:34, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite Semi-Protection: I would like to request for adding semi-protection for an indefinite period to this article as it is been repeatedly vandalised by random IP addresses and a group of new users who are against the article's contents in real life.Rourib Dutta (talk) 14:19, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ad Orientem. The article has been protected for two weeks which seems appropriate. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 18:42, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing from multiple IPs. Annh07 (talk) 15:05, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2409:40C4:0:0:0:0:0:0/32 (talk · contribs). Partially blocked from several articles for disruptive editing after numerous warnings. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 19:04, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Logged as enforcement for WP:CT/IPA. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 19:04, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent efforts by the subject and associates to whitewash the article about him in his favor. 331dot (talk) 15:25, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't have to be ECP- I picked that by accident in Twinkle. 331dot (talk) 15:27, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 19:06, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Edit warring by some IP range; continuously adding ethnicity/background to the lead section[24][25][26]. Mann Mann (talk) 18:31, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 19:11, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Most recent edits are just vandalism, I'm even wondering if they're socks. Myrealnamm (💬pros · ✏️cons) 19:39, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator ScottishFinnishRadish. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 20:06, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Pending changes protection, given that more than half of the edits to this page over the last month are vandalism and BLP violations from seemingly an IP hopper. Leafy46 (talk) 19:50, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 20:09, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:A/I/PIA. nableezy - 20:21, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 20:35, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – A week of semi protection because two IPs recently identified to be changing winner name of an ended season. Thewikizoomer (talk) 05:06, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 18:22, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Continued vandalism by IP and sock. Request escalation to autoconfirmed access. Borgenland (talk) 09:15, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 18:25, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: There appears to be an inordinate amount of edits trying to skew the appearance of the film's reception as positive by adding in statements on the positive audience reception using metrics like IMDB and Rotten Tomatoes user scores which are highly suspect and easily exploited by positive and negative review bombing. IonicBreezeMachine (talk) 13:57, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. It's time to at least try using the talk page. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 18:31, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Shooting occurred at a nearby high school, please protect for at least 7 days. Thanks!. BryceM2001 (talk) 15:46, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. El_C 17:59, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – School had shooting recently, out of respect for victims, protect page. Thanks!. BryceM2001 (talk) 15:47, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Sorry, but that is not a thing that we do. El_C 17:56, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Someone is taking Salvatore Simeone and his titles away from the page, please protect this page from being edited only this account please Tkostudios (talk) 16:08, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Tkostudios You express a desire to own and control this article. Please see WP:OWN and understand that this request is unlikely to succeed. Please also be aware of WP:PAID. I will copy this message to your user talk page. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 16:13, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not done. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 18:21, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Edit warring has resumed again, though progress has been made on the talk page, but player... 7? Has entered the chat and undone recent progress in discussions without consensus. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:12, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Right now, the only options that seem appropriate as per the guidance in the protection policy are full protection or no protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 18:41, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs adding poorly-worded nonsense to plot summary. DonIago (talk) 20:55, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:44, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – People still jumping the gun on calling his date of death. CRBoyer 21:06, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:45, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

07 September 2024

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. vandalism and DE Luhanopi (talk) 15:31, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 19:08, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeat users keep erroneously changing the information on this group which is not current to the information on the actual group's business pages. Thank you. Gaming222 (talk) 21:21, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done as this article does not exist. ----Kinu t/c 21:25, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Gaming222: This is English Wikipedia. Administrators here cannot protect articles on Spanish Wikipedia. You need to ask for help on Spanish Wikipedia. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:17, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection or extended confirmed protection: This page is protected until 11 September 2024. However, the disruptive IP hopper will surely continue its disruption after leaving a message at Talk:Lindy Ruff#Semi-protected edit request on 17 August 2024 (2) (just like it was last time). – sbaio 07:54, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Academic Challenger. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 10:53, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
(Non-administrator comment) User:Favonian answered the same thing previously but then withdrew it very soon after.
I think User:Sbaio's question is whether the protection length on the article can be extended or not, based on a recent disruption that occurred on the article's talk page from the same IP editor. To @Sbaio:, what I'd do is wait 'till the current protection expires and then see what happens afterwards, and request longer page protection if necessary. Admins usually don't "pre-emptively" protect pages or extend them for that reason (it's part of the policy). From what I have seen, a good majority of IP vandals do actually go away and stop attacking a page after one or two protections, sometimes three. — AP 499D25 (talk) 11:10, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You got my idea right and thanks for suggestion. I am pretty sure this particular IP vandal will keep coming back here so I will make a new request when that happens. – sbaio 11:15, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

08 September 2024

Reason: High level of IP and auto-confirmed vandalism who are changing the box office figures that is not said in the source. Some of these auto-confirmed accounts have also got multiple warnings. Please add an increased level of protection to this page. RangersRus (talk) 21:06, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This should be extended-confirmed-protected. Johnny Au (talk/contributions) 00:39, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected. Bbb23 (talk) 01:08, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked – Blocked user used own userpage to make homophobic attacks. It doesn't help that user has a homophobic name. Please also delete user's contributions as they contain offensive personal attacks. Johnny Au (talk/contributions) 00:37, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Can't edit own talk page, should be all set. GoodnightmushTalk 18:14, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... I have also done the necessary RevDels to more or less disappear the username. After this page is archived the same should be done with the subpage. Daniel Case (talk) 04:16, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism started again after the protection from page was removed. Sid95Q (talk) 03:20, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 03:15, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 03:11, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 03:24, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 03:12, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 03:21, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 03:13, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 03:19, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – About a day from harassment. SuperMarioOdyssy101 (talk) 03:25, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Bbb23 (talk) 01:09, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing by new users and IPs. Johnj1995 (talk) 03:51, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:18, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued and ceaseless IP vandalism changing details to conflict with the given sources and that which conflict with the company's website for factory locations. Zinnober9 (talk) 04:57, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 13:16, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Will also log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 03:27, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The talk page has been edit protected before, there's an IP user from Germany who is showing stalker-like behaviour, disagreeing about Arjona's personal life. Now they're calling her names. Perhaps a somewhat longer edit protection this time? The talk page is barely used and the IP user needs to cut it out real fast. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 05:43, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:28, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent unsourced or otherwise questionable edits by IPs. Janhrach (talk) 06:40, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 04:35, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Pending changes doesn't seem to be working. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 03:10, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Time sink. Johnuniq (talk) 04:38, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Frost 07:43, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 04:42, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – continued block evasion from IP and new users. Happily888 (talk) 08:17, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:44, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 09:52, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 04:46, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IP users changing ownership repeatedly. Adriazeri (talk) 11:42, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:50, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Adriazeri (talk) 11:52, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:52, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 03:22, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 04:46, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 03:22, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 04:48, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 03:22, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 04:48, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 03:22, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 04:48, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 03:22, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 04:50, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 03:38, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 04:50, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 03:39, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 04:49, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 03:39, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 04:53, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 03:39, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 04:51, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 03:40, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 04:52, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Caste disruptions

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent WP:CASTE disruption by different sock networks for years (Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kroshta, Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/True History 369), unlikely to stop anytime soon. Considering the sanctioned topic area and the EP at Yadav (with which the socking is connected) asking for the same here. Gotitbro (talk) 13:43, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Both articles, and logged at WP:GS/CASTE. Daniel Case (talk) 05:01, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 13:45, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 05:06, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Targeted by now-blocked vandal Mouchkjhh (talk · contribs) and their collection of rotating IPs performing identical vandalistic, unexplained edits. See also WP:ANI#Disruptive edits in politics-related articles. — Fourthords | =Λ= | 14:27, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 05:09, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalism from recently blocked IP editor that is now using different IP addresses. Xfansd (talk) 03:43, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 04:57, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalism from recently blocked IP editor that is now using different IP addresses. Xfansd (talk) 03:43, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 04:58, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 03:47, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 04:59, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 03:47, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 05:00, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. C F A 💬 16:25, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 05:15, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. C F A 💬 16:26, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. And logged at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 05:19, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Everytime, the users who are unaware of policies, change the caste of the subject. This need to be under watch as many a times, it goes unnoticed. Admantine123 (talk) 17:07, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Logged at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 05:25, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent sockpuppetry and disruptive editing, for more information check the SPI. M S Hassan 📬✍🏻 18:29, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Should be enough time to let the SPI work out. Daniel Case (talk) 05:33, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent, chronic disruptive editing by IP editors. Pinging Ponyo. Bgsu98 (Talk) 21:34, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated major edits made with no sources or unreliable sources. Aadirulez8 (talk) 22:47, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 05:43, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IP persistent addition of unsourced date(s). - FlightTime (open channel) 23:41, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 05:46, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent disruptive edits by blocked sockpuppet IP. Pinging Ponyo. Bgsu98 (Talk) 00:58, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 05:50, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent disruptive edits by blocked sockpuppet IP. Pinging Ponyo. Bgsu98 (Talk) 01:00, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 05:50, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent disruptive edits by blocked sockpuppet IP. Pinging Ponyo. Bgsu98 (Talk) 01:02, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ponyo's on holiday. Stop bothering her and let her enjoy her break. She'll sort me out when she gets back.2A00:23EE:2540:BD04:D5C5:4CDD:B466:9865 (talk) 01:03, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 05:52, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Should also note that the IP is on a /64 now blocked for a month. Daniel Case (talk) 05:55, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Biggest city in the Eastern China Gigalopolis? Making it suspictible to heavy vandalisim pending changes protection please 2603:8001:6940:2100:3231:35E2:C35B:EC74 (talk) 17:02, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I want indefinite semi protection 2600:100C:B058:5B21:40A0:BDDA:48A9:C843 (talk) 17:38, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 03:04, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 05:58, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP vanadlism without proper source attribution and following a problematic source even after a warning Junsik1223 (talk) 05:17, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 06:04, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. IanDBeacon (talk) 05:57, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Latest socks globally locked. Daniel Case (talk) 04:26, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Persistent vandalism – This is the user talk page of a banned user, which is being targeted by WP:LTA/HR socks gaming extended-confirmed permission to vandalise this EC-protected page. As this page belongs to a user who was banned more than four years ago, I think we should just apply indef full protection so that the LTA vandal has less things to do. — AP 499D25 (talk) 06:07, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: Dr. Ashley Schimmel (talk · contribs) blocked by PhilKnight. indef and globally locked. Daniel Case (talk) 04:29, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Due to recent events going on the following subject, a lot of IPs are vandalizing the article. James Conan Niag (talk) 06:12, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Last revert is a week old. Daniel Case (talk) 04:32, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Persistent vandalism – This is the user page of a banned user, which is being targeted by WP:LTA/HR socks gaming extended-confirmed permission to vandalise this EC-protected page. As this page belongs to a user who was banned more than four years ago, I think we should just apply indef full protection so that the LTA vandal has less things to do. — AP 499D25 (talk) 06:06, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: Dr. Ashley Schimmel (talk · contribs) blocked by PhilKnight. indef and globally locked. Daniel Case (talk) 04:30, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Daniel Case I know it's just one user for the time being, but check out History of the chair for another page that has been targeted by this same LTA, which they've been at it with numerous EC-gamed sock accounts over a period of a week now. So I have no doubt they'll come back whenever they have the opportunity to, and vandalise the page more. — AP 499D25 (talk) 05:24, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
As I told you or whoever it was, indef full is just not something I feel comfortable doing without a fuller discussion at AN or somewhere like that giving it consensus. Daniel Case (talk) 05:27, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 13:07, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 04:53, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Notable alumni from the school's post-1980s being removed discriminately. HM2021 (talk) 13:13, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Not much editing over the past couple of years. Daniel Case (talk) 04:54, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism that changes the location to Cambridgeshire despite maps listing this place being in Bedfordshire. QUICKWITTEDHARE CONVERSE 18:28, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 94.192.32.22 (talk · contribs) blocked by Ad Orientem. for 31 hours. Daniel Case (talk) 05:28, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Increasing number of disruptive IP edits within the past 24 hours, making changes contrary to a highly reliable source. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 18:57, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. No edits in over a year. Daniel Case (talk) 05:35, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism (edit warring). Mzwanele Manyi is senior member of South African parliament and is a controversial, South African, political figure. His public profile is linked to his credibility which needs to be protected from unbalanced and inaccurate commentary. Mzansiknightsa (talk) 19:34, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. It was bad at the end of July, but seems quieter now. Daniel Case (talk) 05:36, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Dawnseeker2000 21:24, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'll just drop a note here as User:Daniel Case comes by. I've actually started (or resumed, rather) a discussion on the article talk page here regarding the disputed content, and invited all involved editors to it. So far I got all the editors to join in the talk page discussion except for User:Stabwed, who is the only one constantly restoring their edit on the page without engaging in any discussion at all. I've noticed two things about that account, namely:
  1. it is a recently created account and its only (and first) edits were to restore that disputed version of the article. They've not made any edits to other articles or even other parts of the article whatsoever.
  2. They have not been warned or informed on their talk page about the edit-warring policy
I don't know of any sock farms out there who could be doing this kind of stuff to this particular article, so I'm going to assume good faith here and think that this is just a new user who started editing Wikipedia after noticing a big part went missing on an article that they read frequently. So, I've given them an edit-warring warning (the softer one, i.e. uw-ewsoft) and hopefully they will notice and read what I've said there. — AP 499D25 (talk) 05:35, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked: Stabwed (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. indef as NOTHERE. Daniel Case (talk) 05:39, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Subject recently won the US Open, and as such her article is receiving a lot of vandalism. Hard to keep up with it all.  — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs)  22:35, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 05:34, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The page has had a significant level of IP vandalism/unsourced additions for a while now. Also the subject of a possible transfer so is likely to attract more unconstructive editing Michaeldble (talk) 22:21, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Gave it 2 weeks. Can revisit after if problems recur. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 22:27, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Johnuniq (talk) 09:58, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The page has had a consistent level of IP vandalism for a while now - would suggest a longer protection Michaeldble (talk) 22:23, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done I gave it ten days. Can revisit with longer if continues Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 22:25, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Johnuniq (talk) 09:58, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-Protection: Constant incorrect edits based on rumors and probably on fandom preference.The actress hasn’t confirmed a relationship with actor Fred Hechinger so it shouldn’t say they’re dating based only on paparazzi photos. Jvlslvr (talk) 23:21, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done I gave it a week. Can revisit of problems recur. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 22:22, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Johnuniq (talk) 09:58, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: requesting Extended Confirmed Protection per ARBPIA. history of problematic edits from non-ECR users Rainsage (talk) 00:39, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done as part of ARBPIA Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 22:30, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Johnuniq (talk) 09:58, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing, including possible sockpuppetry. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 01:29, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done I've given it 3 weeks, we'll see if the problem persists afterwards. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 22:34, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Johnuniq (talk) 09:58, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Obvious abuse of multiple accounts. Cysquatch (talk) 03:09, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done given it 10 days Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 22:37, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Johnuniq (talk) 09:58, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Leonidlednev (T, C, L) 03:18, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done tweaked protection now Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 22:39, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Johnuniq (talk) 09:58, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing by blocked sockpuppet editor. Bgsu98 (Talk) 01:21, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2A00:23EE:2540:BD04:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Drmies. for a month. Daniel Case (talk) 05:55, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing. Donnowin1 (talk) 03:00, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined It's over now. Daniel Case (talk) 05:56, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism. Nxcrypto Message 09:21, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. since one of the sock accounts is autoconfirmed. Daniel Case (talk) 17:17, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – LTA from User:Yawners' Cleaner et al., and please hide recent revisions from socks User:PowerMinersFan and User:Toa Mahri Kongu. Wikishovel (talk) 09:58, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. And nonsense revision deleted. Johnuniq (talk) 10:05, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: CTOPS Israel-Palestine. Borgenland (talk) 14:50, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 17:08, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Consider long-term protection under arbitration enforcement for WP:ARBAP2. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:11, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 17:03, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Nxcrypto Message 09:19, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 17:20, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Left CTOPS notice on talk. Daniel Case (talk) 17:21, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page receives vandalism only edits. Rarely receives legitimate contributions. DaHuzyBru (talk) 10:04, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:43, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. – DreamRimmer (talk) 10:09, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:44, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent long term disruption. IP range may merit scrutiny. 2601:19E:4100:710:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 10:10, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator PhilKnight. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:45, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Vandalism and Disruptive edits By IP Address. Gunther :  Talk  12:08, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:47, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: There is an ongoing issue with vandalism on Circassian-related articles, where an individual is consistently removing content related to religions other than Islam, despite the presence of reliable sources. This user is evading detection by using different IP addresses and has been banned on some occasions, but continues to disrupt the articles.

The vandalism is not only removing relevant information but also undermining the neutrality and accuracy of the articles. I request that the Circassian-related articles be protected to prevent further disruption and ensure the integrity of the content.

I believe this measure is necessary to maintain the quality and reliability of the articles and to prevent further disruption. Thank you for considering this request. Flux500 (talk) 12:57, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:49, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Long-term IP vandalism and removal of sourced content. Skitash (talk) 13:42, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:54, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Frost 13:51, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:51, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism going on since late 2023. CaptainOlimar42 (talk) 14:04, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:55, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent spike in vandalism from IP addresses and new accounts since 20:29, 7 September 2024. Panian513 14:17, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:58, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – LTA readdition of long-winded unsourced POV commentary by several socks today alone. Wikishovel (talk) 14:33, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:59, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes protection: Persistent disruptive editing by lots of IP's MAL MALDIVE (talk) 19:31, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected Ymblanter (talk) 20:02, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent vandalism by IP addresses on this BLP since 13:09, 3 September 2024. Panian513 19:41, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 19:59, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: 8 years after the start of their hoax (various IPs) :

Although maybe "not enough recent disruption", they will not stop (and I don't want to play anymore)

Over to someone else now. 175.39.65.201 (talk) 15:44, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:07, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. AntiDionysius (talk) 16:03, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:11, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. At least 8 previous protections and vandalism has continued. That’s enough! 2603:8080:D03:89D4:A8F9:D254:9C47:7D12 (talk) 17:11, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:12, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Incessant edit-warring between User:GustavoCza and User:Rodericksilly. (The back-and-forth at Chris Martin could also maybe deserve a look, although they seem to have moved on from that one) Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 17:39, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This was the page's last version before Rodericksilly started to edit war. Please be sure to restore it before putting up the protection. As it's the version that remained stable for months without interruption. GustavoCza (talkcontribs) 17:42, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
As for the Chris Martin page, Rodericksilly insisted on a non-existing guideline and used WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS to support it while my version is because I want the article to have a better division between paragraphs, also separating them between biography and achievements. GustavoCza (talkcontribs) 17:45, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This user wants inappropriate editorializing language throughout articles which I have seen removed from other articles. All I have done is remove it. Rodericksilly (talk) 17:48, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
To both of you: This is very much not the place to argue about who is right. You can go to the talk page if you want to constructively discuss it, but the WP:BATTLEGROUND mentality needs to stop from both sides. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 17:49, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This doesn't need protection, so much as a round of blocks for for all involved. Writ Keeper  17:52, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm more than happy to not get involved in anything else if the articles get restored to before Rodericksilly began to act like I'm a terrible editor who does everything wrong. GustavoCza (talkcontribs) 17:57, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Fully protected for a period of 24 hrs, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. If this continues or resumes, I will be inclined to start dropping blocks. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:17, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinate semi-protection: The page is already protected until 2122, which does not make any sense to protect a page for 100 years only for it to not be protected when that 100 years has passed. I think an Indefinate semi protection would be best. 142.114.181.79 (talk) 07:09, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 07:12, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Declined I'm deferring to what Firefangledfeathers wrote in the log, that there is no practical difference here. Since none of us are likely to be alive (at least not in our present form) when protection expires, and further I really doubt there will be an appetite for actively disrupting this article in the early 22nd century, I don't think we need decide this now. Daniel Case (talk) 17:25, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. High risk page. Protection requested as per WP:CT/IPA Wikibear47 (talk) 08:23, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 17:23, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Constant addition of unsourced content by several IPs and unconfirmed users. CycloneYoris talk! 09:49, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 17:21, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: A user with a red nickname constantly deletes information from the source, adding information without a source Dushnilkin (talk) 07:17, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:39, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism. NumberjacksFan2024 (talk) 09:51, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:41, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Requesting reducing protection level of the page from extended confirmed to Semi-protection. Since the candidate lists is incomplete, and election issues and party campaigns sections are completely empty, more editors are needed to update the article. Dhruv edits (talk) 16:42, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotected: you can discuss this with the protecting administrator at User talk:Daniel Quinlan if you want, but this protection is a contentious-topics restriction and can't be undone here (see WP:CTOP#Appeals and amendments). Extraordinary Writ (talk) 19:20, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

09 September 2024

Reason: Persistent vandalism JeanMercier90 (talk) 14:46, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:00, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – New target of HoY Piermark. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 15:31, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. No disruption in the last two days. Come back if it resumes. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:03, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing and IP vandalism. Skitash (talk) 20:39, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:05, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Sock edits spanning half a month; see page history. ZZZ'S 22:50, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Elli (talk | contribs) 23:01, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please change it to indefinite semi 2603:8080:D03:89D4:DBC:A9DB:D80B:D9D6 (talk) 02:56, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Second time disruptive editing is happening after the protection removed. Need to protect the page for longer time. Mehedi Abedin 21:05, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:06, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Excessive vandalism by multiple IPs. SparklingBlueMoon (talk) 21:31, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:08, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Frequent pious, wishful-thinking, and nonacademic intervention Temerarius (talk) 21:38, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:10, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IPs will not discuss on talk page about adding content that goes against the manual of style . Mike Allen 19:04, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:21, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Ad Orientem (talk) 00:49, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Frequent pious, wishful-thinking, and nonacademic intervention Temerarius (talk) 21:38, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined: not enough recent disruption. Elli (talk | contribs) 22:46, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Ad Orientem (talk) 00:49, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Frequent pious, wishful-thinking, and nonacademic intervention Temerarius (talk) 21:39, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:11, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Ad Orientem (talk) 00:49, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – LTA target. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 23:18, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:47, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Ad Orientem (talk) 00:49, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: While an editor adding POV content from unreliable sources was recently banned for WP:NOTHERE, there is still a high amount of disruptive anonymous IP editing, specifically near-constantly adding the misleading category that the game was LGBT focused. (It's not, just a shooter about space mercenaries, people are just angry the cast was diverse). ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ () 23:44, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:49, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Ad Orientem (talk) 00:49, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Continued editwarring on infobox image, open discussion on talk page. - FlightTime (open channel) 15:31, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If we full-protect it, it will mean that when that full protection expires all protection will end as it is not currently possible to layer two levels of protection. I can set a W-Ping to reset it, but this will likely mean there will be some period where the article is completely unprotected. Would you be OK with this possibiility? Daniel Case (talk) 05:14, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I always set pending changes in these situations, which act as insurence for a period there is no other protection. Ymblanter (talk) 19:57, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Declined It looks like things have settled down. Come back if the problems start recurring. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:53, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Ad Orientem (talk) 00:53, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing from multiple IPs. Annh07 (talk) 01:11, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:16, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Ad Orientem (talk) 01:16, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing from multiple IPs. Annh07 (talk) 01:19, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:55, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Ad Orientem (talk) 01:55, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Likely a rapid sock vandalism. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 02:33, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:05, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi protection: IP vandalism Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 02:50, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. /64 range blocked x 1 week. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:07, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Regular vandalism from IP addresses and new accounts to this BLP since 03:43, 27 August 2024. Panian513 02:54, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This has been going on for quite a while. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:09, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruption by unregistered user, despite multiple requests to cease and discuss instead. Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 04:47, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. I've issued a warning for edit warring. If this continues either drop me a line or request assistance at WP:3RRN. Ad Orientem (talk) 05:30, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP still disruptive despite many warning. HurricaneEdgar 04:53, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Ad Orientem (talk) 05:32, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Salt the earth - Repeated re-creation by sock-/meatpuppets; subject has been consistently rejected whenever a draft has been submitted due to an utter lack of sources. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 06:33, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected Lectonar (talk) 10:47, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 09:13, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 13:23, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Shadow4dark (talk) 12:57, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Elli (talk | contribs) 14:20, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP users are actively edit-warring on this article to remove LBGT-related content. BOZ (talk) 13:34, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Elli (talk | contribs) 14:17, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Create protection is no longer required because the page will be redirected to Royal Match. The company is not notable enough for its own article, but is best known for its creation of the game. This is the result of an AFC/R request. Original administrator has not been active since April, and a timely response is unlikely. Garsh (talk) 22:27, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done This doesn't seem controversial to me. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:24, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Courtesy ping @Garsh2. -Ad Orientem (talk) 02:26, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 15:31, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Protected for over a decade. However, both of the page protectors are likely inactive. Consider downgrading protection level and set a time limit?102.106.191.176 (talk)

Question: Agree the disruption that led to the AfD being protected has long since ceased. But curious why anyone would need to edit this closed AFD from 2011. The deleted article title (VIBES FM Hamburg) is not protected so is theoretically available for recreation if the subject has since become notable. -- Euryalus (talk) 06:48, 8 September 2024 (UTC) Euryalus (talk) 06:48, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment: There's no reason to edit it, so why unprotect it? - Sumanuil. (talk to me) 07:10, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Let me ask you this then: why won't you at least let EC users fix Linter Errors in case if they notice any?102.106.191.176 (talk) 07:20, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Does it have any? - Sumanuil. (talk to me) 07:26, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Sumanuil It's clean from all lint* error types that we regularly fix and I don't see any reason to need to edit that page for lint reasons.
 * The one "issue" that you'll see listed there in the lint info, "night-mode-unaware-background-color", is more a tracking category than a lint error, and it is predominantly being left alone by the experienced delinting editors since we don't really agree with WMF for it's classification as lint, and since the issues are not well defined with a high rate of false flags. Until then, those issues are to be ignored. Zinnober9 (talk) 15:35, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not unprotected I reduced the protection to WP:ECP. No reason for less than that. Johnuniq (talk) 10:46, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Was protected due to IP activity during the release of a popular film. It can be unprotected considering the history being calm, giving chance to potential improvements by new users. Thewikizoomer (talk) 07:31, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If not possible protection until 1 January 2025 is more than enough according to me. Thewikizoomer (talk) 07:33, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not unprotected @Thewikizoomer: In the history of the article (see links above), click "logs" near the top to see the protection action with reason. The links in that reason explain that articles in contentious topics are often protected. Johnuniq (talk) 10:41, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The user who requested page protection is a bully who reverted necessary edits. An entire paragraph was repeated in the article. When an IP cleaned up the mistake they reverted it. They also reverted the ips edit in unrelated pages. They have a personal vendetta gainst them. They protected dthe page and possibly used a sockpuppet to revert the page to the state they wanted it to be in. They have an agenda. So please unprotect the page Donteatgarlic (talk) 10:28, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotected @Donteatgarlic: You must not accuse other editors of bad behavior unless accompanied with evidence and at a noticeboard for that purpose, usually WP:ANI. If you have a proposal regarding the article, suggest it at the article talk page, with reliable sources. Johnuniq (talk) 10:36, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Here is the evidence. The editor reverted the ips edit in rape in Pakistan.Then they proceeded to revert another edit made by the same in nwfp referendum article. They clearly have a personal vendetta. They accused me of all sorts of stuff when I sided with the ip. My edit was very valid. There was an entire paragraph copy pasted from one place to another. So please consider my request. Donteatgarlic (talk) 10:39, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
they removed vandalism warnings from their talk page. Someone is being allowed to commit vandalism and block people who are trying to stop them Donteatgarlic (talk) 10:48, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated vandalism by specific users/IPs adding false information with no reliable sources. Please review and take action against repeated vandalism. Here is a sample of the recurrent edits, adding false information about money laundering to the page without credible sources. It relies solely on a single website that is neither authentic nor trustworthy. As apparent in the history of the page, this piece of information was added and removed way too many times. • curprev 02:36, 9 September 2024‎ 2402:e000:508:5006:91e:d4d2:4870:e04c talk‎ 16,480 bytes +178‎ No edit summaryundo Tag: Undo • curprev 12:51, 8 September 2024‎ Urban Goodwin I talk contribs‎ m 16,302 bytes −178‎ Undid revision 1244666261 by 2402:E000:508:5006:91E:D4D2:4870:E04C (talk) undothank Tags: Undo Reverted • curprev 12:45, 8 September 2024‎ 2402:e000:508:5006:91e:d4d2:4870:e04c talk‎ 16,480 bytes +178‎ No edit summaryundo Tags: Reverted Visual edit • curprev 14:34, 4 September 2024‎ Thenightaway talk contribs‎ 16,302 bytes +1,072‎ Undid revision 1243993554 by Prash1998 (talk) undothank Tags: Undo Reverted • curprev 13:39, 4 September 2024‎ Thenightaway talk contribs‎ 16,302 bytes +1,072‎ Undid revision 1243945458 by Prash1998 (talk) undothank Tags: Undo Reverted • curprev 16:21, 2 September 2024‎ JohnFromPinckney talk contribs‎ 16,302 bytes +1,072‎ Reverted 1 edit by Prash1998 (talk): Rv unexplained edit-warring deletion of sourced material. Also: deleting 1072 bytes (for the TENTH time!) is NOT a minor edit. undothank Tags: Twinkle Undo Reverted • curprev 13:32, 29 August 2024‎ Thenightaway talk contribs‎ 16,302 bytes +1,072‎ Undid revision 1242865773 by Prash1998 (talk) undothank Tags: Undo Reverted • curprev 19:52, 27 August 2024‎ Thenightaway talk contribs‎ 16,302 bytes +1,072‎ Undid revision 1242511545 by Prash1998 (talk) undothank Tags: Undo Reverted • curprev 14:42, 25 August 2024‎ Thenightaway talk contribs‎ 16,263 bytes +1,072‎ Undid revision 1242171894 by Prash1998 (talk) undothank Tags: Undo Reverted

Marina0804 (talk) 07:43, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined: this is a content dispute and something that should be discussed on the talkpage. I have however blocked Prash1998, who has been edit-warring to remove the content, from the page. Elli (talk | contribs) 14:26, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP disruption. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 15:53, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Xaosflux. Favonian (talk) 16:59, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Periodic BLP vandalism by newly-registered editors and various IPs over the past month. Skywatcher68 (talk) 17:56, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Joyous! Noise! 18:04, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 09:17, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Left CTOPS notice on talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 20:36, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – As can be seen in the edit summaries and the edits themselves, apparently a group of IPs are hellbent on tarnishing the image of a certain Natasha Sandhu. They have even added links and bank details. I'd request revdel as well. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 20:16, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 20:35, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to request that... (date of death is updated to 30/11/2024) . Jamesington (talk) 23:58, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Talk:Sophie Anderson (actress) is not protected. A reliable source for the information is required. Favonian (talk) 16:58, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism since last semi expired. MaterialsPsych (talk) 07:19, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected Ymblanter (talk) 20:47, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 09:13, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 20:49, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent sockpuppetry. HorrorLover555 (talk) 09:14, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 20:52, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 09:14, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 20:47, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 09:16, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will leave CTOPS notice on talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 20:44, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Semi protection. A large number of edits are repeatedly reverting IP's who change the spelling of "alfa" to "alpha", despite the plain text being "al<--do not change-->f<--do not change-->a." — kwami (talk) 11:09, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 20:50, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 13:43, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 20:47, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Bout of disruptive editing changing country names from a dynamic IP. CMD (talk) 15:19, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 24 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 20:45, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection Persistent IP vandalism JSFarman (talk) 17:09, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 20:44, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent spike in IP vandalism since 04:25, 9 September 2024‎, adding the viral, disproven hoax of immigrants eating pets. Panian513 18:28, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 20:42, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism by Indonesian trolls like User:Bagusekaf07 and IP. Would like longer protection period than one week. 3skandar (talk) 10:18, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 20:53, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Waxworker (talk) 14:46, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 20:55, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: BLP policy violations. Lahsim Niasoh (talk) 14:53, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 20:54, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of valdalism Nixx999 (talk) 16:09, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 20:53, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:A/I/PIA. nableezy - 16:35, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected Ymblanter (talk) 20:57, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Requesting bluelocking. The article is still subject to continued WP:BLP violations, sockpuppetry, and edit-warring. The sockmaster has been trying to add 12,000 bytes of defamatory material for the past two weeks, most recently, with his brand-new Ymberlen account.[29] I removed the text from the article per WP:BLPRS because I think it beats WP:3RR. See Special:Diff/1244038066 if you are interested in the details. @User:Daniel Case. Thank you. 31.30.111.66 (talk) 08:24, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: Ymberlen (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. indef as NOTHERE. Daniel Case (talk) 18:54, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Protection requested to prevent disruptive editing, unexplained content removal, addition of unreferenced material, and general attempts to change the nature of this article completely.

The users who were originally involved in this article have been blocked, and IP editors (possibly same individuals, or meat puppets of theirs) are now joining in. Basically, the aim is to whitewash this individual by making bad stuff vanish and good stuff magically appear. Semi-protection should put a stop to that?

For a background on this, see: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stefano Černetić / Talk:Stefano Černetić / Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bajsikus/Archive.

If indef isn't justified, please apply whatever temporary duration seems reasonable, thanks. DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:22, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. The page hasn't been protected previously so I don't want to jump straight to an indefinite protection. Aoidh (talk) 21:32, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism from several different IPs today. Entranced98 (talk) 15:00, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 48 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Aoidh (talk) 21:34, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

10 September 2024

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing by an IP user, whose keep restoring his edits when reverted. PJ Santos (talk) 05:58, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Ymblanter (talk) 20:44, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: 11RR edit warring and continued insertion of plagiarized and copyvio content by IP despite multiple warnings. Borgenland (talk) 14:11, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 188.25.104.45 (talk · contribs) blocked by Cullen328. for 31 hours. Daniel Case (talk) 20:39, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I would like to request semi-protected the Isamusa page to avoid any vandalism since the Isamusa is major Somali sub-clan. Jiilaal (talk) 19:15, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

+1 Reason: Hello Wikipedia administrators, I would like to request semi-protected the Isamusa page to avoid any vandalism since the Isamusa is major Somali sub-clan. Thank you. Jiilaal (talk) 19:20, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ymblanter (talk) 20:41, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. GoodnightmushTalk 20:42, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated genre changing without explanation. UndergroundMan3000 (talk) 19:27, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 20:40, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Leonidlednev (T, C, L) 21:12, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I hope an admin gets to this soon; the subject's death is attracting a lot of vandals to the article. Funcrunch (talk) 23:15, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 23:21, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing; addition of unsourced (caste related POV) content; WP:GSCASTE. Ekdalian (talk) 08:50, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at WP:GS/CASTE. Daniel Case (talk) 01:16, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 09:17, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 01:20, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism still occurs after the protection expired, maybe indef protection?. Myrealnamm's Alternate Account (talk) 12:51, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. GoodnightmushTalk 20:58, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: CTOPS Israel. Borgenland (talk) 14:41, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 01:31, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Long term vandalism and sockpuppetry. Pachu Kannan (talk) 15:36, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 01:36, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP vandalism. GeorgeMemulous (talk) 22:06, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. GFOLEY FOUR!22:31, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IPs edit warring. Belbury (talk) 16:58, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Which should stop the edit warring long enough for the SPI on one of the editors to work out. Daniel Case (talk) 01:43, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Mostly from an individual who uses different IP addresses. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 [𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺] 21:45, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 01:51, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. KingSkyLord (talk | contribs) 22:33, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 01:54, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Frequent vandalism Hypnôs (talk) 23:00, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. They are eternal, after all. Daniel Case (talk) 01:58, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Hot topic with discussion underway on the Talk page re the form of the subject's name. However, there is edit warring in the article involving new users regarding the name. I think semi-protection is appropriate until things settle down. Nurg (talk) 00:15, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:03, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – An ip keeps adding an incorrect parent category. Mason (talk) 01:52, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:23, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Various IPs adding category that doesn't appear to be supported by article. DonIago (talk) 15:30, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 00:36, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistant disruptive edits. Catfurball (talk) 18:46, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 00:37, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2603:8080:D03:89D4:61C4:3B59:966:C93B (talk) 21:48, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

6 previous protection 2603:8080:D03:89D4:61C4:3B59:966:C93B (talk) 21:49, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The vandal was a Sacramento resident, according to the WHOIS 2603:8080:D03:89D4:E40C:F0FD:39E3:5EA1 (talk) 00:39, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. Doesn't appear same as previous vandalism. Range already blocked Special:Contribs/2600:1010:0:0:0:0:0:0/32 GFOLEY FOUR!22:30, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent sockpuppetry. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TyMega. HorrorLover555 (talk) 22:58, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 00:40, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 23:56, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 00:41, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – same issue of an ip repeatedly adding the wrong category, and slow edit warring. Mason (talk) 01:54, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:26, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IPs disruptive editing. Thewikizoomer (talk) 09:42, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

IPs observed to be adding unsourced content repeatedly and disturbing certain templates. Thewikizoomer (talk) 09:43, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 01:26, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Template is in the WP:ARBPIA CTOP area. TarnishedPathtalk 10:18, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 01:28, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2603:8080:D03:89D4:61C4:3B59:966:C93B (talk) 21:48, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done by Vsmith Babysharkboss2!! (Nomad Vagabond) 00:59, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
the protection lasted for 1 year, not indefinite. I prefer indefinite for every article that is vandalized frequently, including this one 2603:8080:D03:89D4:E40C:F0FD:39E3:5EA1 (talk) 01:06, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 05:20, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Too much IP address disruption since it was posted at the ITN. 🛧Midori No Sora♪🛪 ( ☁=☁=✈) 19:54, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: User @1A8J6R5, who is paid to edit Wikipedia on behalf of Rider University, has made numerous edits to this page that have removed factually sourced information, in an effort to 'paint a rosy picture' of Dell'Omo's tenure as President of Rider University. JDankers (talk) 20:01, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This needs to be discussed with the user. If they are not responsive, a partial block or a sitewide block might be in order. There is currently no need for protection. Ymblanter (talk) 20:40, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Declined per above. Daniel Case (talk) 01:46, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent subtle vandalism (fake/incorrect syllables) by a range of IPs, 9 reverts and counting since Sep 5th. Jpatokal (talk) 21:41, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2405:201:1D:E843:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by JBW. for a month. Daniel Case (talk) 01:48, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism, someone adding revival of GMA News TV, a defunct news channel in the Philippines, now known as (GTV) Philippine TV channel, or possible adding a TeleRadyo-like channel (Dobol B TV), even though no such teasers or series of test broadcast done by GMA. BeemoKincaid (talk) 01:07, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Doesn't appear to have been a reverted edit in almost three weeks. Daniel Case (talk) 02:18, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism 2603:8080:D03:89D4:4CEA:FD5B:6E65:90A (talk) 01:43, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The history is ridiculous 2603:8080:D03:89D4:4CEA:FD5B:6E65:90A (talk) 01:44, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
How long should we lock this page up? 2603:8080:D03:89D4:4CEA:FD5B:6E65:90A (talk) 01:46, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The vandal is a Berkeley resident 2603:8080:D03:89D4:4CEA:FD5B:6E65:90A (talk) 01:47, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked: 2001:5A8:450C:BD00:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by ScottishFinnishRadish. I will also RevDel the edits since they possibly defamed an identifiable living person. Daniel Case (talk) 02:20, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. related to Palestine and Isreal Daisytheduck quack quack 02:02, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. And not all that closely related to the topic. Daniel Case (talk) 02:27, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – IP changing signatures, not contributing to article, harassing paid editor. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/73.211.173.173. Diff Special:Diff/1244740877. ⸺(Random)staplers 06:42, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Indeed, no pc-protection for talk-pages. And article talkpages are not usually protected, if semi-protected at all only for a limited duration in the most severe cases of disruption. The disruption isn't severe enough here. Lectonar (talk) 07:00, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – IPs adding information that is currently under dispute at article's Talk page. DonIago (talk) 02:47, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined User warned for edit warring. If the issues persist, report to WP:ANI or WP:3RRN as appropriate. Ad Orientem (talk) 04:03, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – almost immediately after the last 24-hour full protection expired, GustavoCza is back at it with another back-and-forth (albeit partial reverts this time) with a different editor, and they've completely ignored several requests to discuss at the talk page from their last dispute... the page either needs to be protected for longer to force GustavoCza to discuss, or they need to be blocked, whether it be from the site (for longer than their last block, which was less than a month ago) or from editing pages related to/involving Coldplay (with which they have serious and obvious ownership and civility issues) for a period of time. 4TheWynne (talk contribs) 04:29, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See here and here regarding recent activity. 4TheWynne (talk contribs) 04:42, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. This can't be solved by escalating full protections, but should be tackled by more precise instruments like partial blocks, e.g.. ANI (again) or the edit-warring noticeboard should be tried first, as article talk doesn't seem to be used. Lectonar (talk) 07:17, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Request to page extend protection indefinite : High level of IP vandalism. Arunntr (talk) 04:36, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. There aren't any IP edits in the last days. Lectonar (talk) 07:21, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Persistent vandalism – Very persistent IPs (possibly the same individual) have been repeatedly changing the box office gross. This has been ongoing for several weeks. Contributor19 (talk) 05:14, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question: @Contributor19: why full protection? Lectonar (talk) 07:23, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Lectonar That was a mistake on my part. It doesn't have to be full protection. I think temporary protection would suffice. Contributor19 (talk) 07:50, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 14:55, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Semi-protection for a short period until the SPI is sorted would be useful - Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TomWatkins1970. Thanks. 10mmsocket (talk) 07:41, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 13:08, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 08:21, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. GoodnightmushTalk 13:04, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — GhostInTheMachine talk to me 08:35, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. GoodnightmushTalk 13:01, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP repeatedly removing sourced information from the article, has ignored a talk page warning. - adamstom97 (talk) 11:18, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. GoodnightmushTalk 13:06, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Long-term high level of vandalism/test edits. Alexeyevitch(talk) 12:30, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. GoodnightmushTalk 12:44, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism and BLP violations by IP editors. JeffSpaceman (talk) 13:48, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Will be logged under WP:CT/BLP. Favonian (talk) 15:10, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism. Trolling. 73.67.145.30 (talk) 16:01, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

+1 Reason: Extreme level of vandalism by IP address(es). Immediate action needed. TheProEditor11 (talk) 16:06, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2603:300a:108:100::/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by RickinBaltimore.
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 16:18, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: indefinite semi-protection - ongoing attempts by IP(s) over several months to remove unflattering information about the college. Wellington Bay (talk) 16:11, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 16:21, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Recent spike in IP vandalism and disruptive edits to this BLP since 09:27, 10 September 2024‎. Panian513 16:32, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Assorted Dubai IPs blocked as well. Favonian (talk) 17:07, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – As can be seen in the history, there seems to be a content dispute. I'd like to request a full protection. Thanks. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 11:51, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at WP:GS/CASTE (as the subject is a South Asian social group). Daniel Case (talk) 18:56, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive edits by unregistered user. Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 14:06, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs have been changing height for months. Nswix (talk) 15:03, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will leave CTOPS notice on talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 19:07, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Waxworker (talk) 15:49, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 19:17, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Either multiple IP users or an IP hopper is disrupting the article for a long time. So it needs to be semi-protected indefinitely. NitinMlk (talk) 17:32, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator GB fan. Favonian (talk) 18:13, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – IPs adding category unsupported by article text without editing the article body to justify the inclusion of the category. DonIago (talk) 16:20, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruption by IPs, especially regarding his birthplace. StephenMacky1 (talk) 17:28, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 19:24, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Per last block request, persistent improperly sourced contents addition by a Turkey editor with roving IPs. An admin has handed out IP blocks, but they keep coming back with new IPs. WP:DUCK as same article and same edits, but all from Turkey. Wikishovel (talk) 18:41, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 19:28, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:CT/AI. Skitash (talk) 19:09, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 19:32, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Same protection is needed for Goo Goo Dolls. Logged-out socks of User:Brettandelle are trying to insert the hired drummer Craig Macintyre as a full band member, without any announcement or new item in that regard. See Talk:Goo Goo Dolls#Touring drummer Craig Macintyre. Binksternet (talk) 19:22, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 19:43, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: News of his personal life and conduct has become a BLP issue. IP vandals want to use this as an opportunity to write things like “filthy cheat” in the article. I think protecting it so that only actual editors can edit will discourage / prevent even more IP vandals. Trillfendi (talk) 19:54, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 20:35, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated vandalism by IP user and sockpuppery. YannickFran (talk) 20:02, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 20:33, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: per WP:CT/A-I. Pachu Kannan (talk) 08:01, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined The article has been moved; you should request protection for September 2024 Al-Mawasi refugee camp attack. Daniel Case (talk) 18:48, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A user is disruptively adding unsourced text without proper references to support the claim without any discussion in talk page. Saurabh{Talk} 10:46, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Other than today's edits I'm not seeing anything long term. Your talk page discussion with them seems to suggest you see the possibility of sockpuppetry; you might find SPI a better forum. Daniel Case (talk) 18:51, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Malappuram FC is the main team in the ongoing Kerala Super League[30] [31] Even with IP address, new users are wrongly editing this page Spworld2 (talk) 10:50, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Target of block-evader across multiple IPs (2402:8100:2738:B09C:B1B8:81D9:1675:B22A (talk · contribs)). AntiDionysius (talk) 13:42, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2402:8100:385B:AD72:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by PhilKnight. for a month. Daniel Case (talk) 19:01, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Target of block-evader across multiple IPs (2402:8100:2738:B09C:B1B8:81D9:1675:B22A (talk · contribs)). AntiDionysius (talk) 13:42, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2402:8100:385B:AD72:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by PhilKnight. for a month. Daniel Case (talk) 19:01, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Target of block-evader across multiple IPs (2402:8100:2738:B09C:B1B8:81D9:1675:B22A (talk · contribs)). AntiDionysius (talk) 13:42, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2402:8100:385B:AD72:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by PhilKnight. for a month. Daniel Case (talk) 19:02, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism and a cause of dispute between users. JeanMercier90 (talk) 14:35, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Favonian (talk) 18:55, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Edit warring, COI editing HelpUsStopSpam (talk) 20:52, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Checking to see if protection is necessary. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:28, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I will also warn the editor. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:36, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

11 September 2024

Semi-protection: - IP disruption after appointment as Foreign Minister.--BabbaQ (talk) 15:45, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 19:09, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent addition of unsourced content by IP-hopping editor since 15:28, 7 September 2024‎. Panian513 18:28, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2A02:C7C:6D8A:6A00:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by PhilKnight. for 48 hours. Daniel Case (talk) 19:26, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Long-term sockpuppetry by autoconfirmed accounts of GENSEX POV-pusher Raxythecat since May 2023.

Socks by Raxy that edited this article (there could be more IPs):

Raxy seems to be an experienced sockpuppeteer and, judging by the number of reverts by his accounts, he has this page on his "watchlist", so a temporary semi-protection would have little effect here. And judging by the similar POV and article preferences, User:BreadCastle and User:Mushfluff could also be related to this, the article was protected for sockpuppetry in 2020 because of them. Badbluebus (talk) 22:09, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Aoidh (talk) 23:46, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: A user (Sira Aspera) since April 2024 is repeadetly editing back every correction of the page. I have been giving more detailed informations about the execution of Şehzade Mustafa, however, this user have edited back, with poorly written undetailed text, my corrections and editions despite the sourcings. Therefore, I request your protection of this site as of 10.09.2024, 13:32 UTC version. 94.254.118.178 (talk) 13:34, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If we semi-protect the page you won't be able to edit it. Daniel Case (talk) 18:59, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:39, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated removal of sourced content; page was previously locked for a year. As soon as the protection was removed, the vadalism and deletion of high-quality, credible sourced content started again. Belladonna2024 (talk) 22:32, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 7 days by User:ScottishFinnishRadish, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Aoidh (talk) 23:58, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not sure if the underscore that was in {{pagelinks|Elisa_Hategan}} when the request was added caused this, but it is protected. Removed the underscore. - Aoidh (talk) 00:30, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator ScottishFinnishRadish. May this please the bot. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 01:40, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit war over information in this article that cause disruptive behavior. A consensus in the article's discussion area must be reached from one or more reliable sources before editing the disputed information. SparklingBlueMoon (talk) 22:48, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Aoidh (talk) 23:48, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – I am sick of restoring the caste of the subject as even after self identification, multiple attempts have been made to change the caste of subject by new users flooding from somewhere. This page need this protection in order to keep a track on this. Admantine123 (talk) 02:11, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:47, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism. Kingsmasher678 (talk) 02:34, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. This has been going on forever. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:49, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Request raising protection to indefinite ECP per WP:GENSEX CTOP due to repeated oversightable BLP violations to prevent further disruption. Raladic (talk) 03:27, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Daniel Case. Ad Orientem (talk) 05:07, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Moderated a polarized debate, going to get vandalized EditingCabbageLilly (talk) 03:31, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Joyous!. Ad Orientem (talk) 05:08, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Series of disruptive edits to the BLP of one of the moderators of the US presidential debate tonight. Innisfree987 (talk) 04:26, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 05:11, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism. Pachu Kannan (talk) 05:06, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Logging at AEL. Ad Orientem (talk) 05:14, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Requesting page protection due to high traffic and potential for disruptive edits as the election date approaches. This topic is susceptible and has already drawn significant attention from various editors, leading to frequent edits and concerns over biased or unsourced information being added. Semi-protection (or full protection, if warranted) would be appropriate until after the election period to maintain the article's neutrality and accuracy. IDB.S (talk) 04:13, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Come back if the situation changes. Ad Orientem (talk) 05:10, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – An IP hopper keeps on coming days after days and months after months to change the town lead to suburb which it clearly isn't, they don't reply on their talk page, do nothing, they come change without sources at random times. The town is clearly has its own jurisdiction and miles away from Vijayawada, not even once source confirms that it is a suburb. The IP hopper is clearly not helping with holding a discussion. Requesting indefinite semi protection. Thewikizoomer (talk) 04:29, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Very few edits in the last six months. Ad Orientem (talk) 05:12, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP vandalism. C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 05:28, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 05:51, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected: Repeatedly recreated. M S Hassan 📬✍🏻 05:29, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. Ad Orientem (talk) 05:55, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Ad Orientem The user who recreated these redirects is an extended confirmed user, so I think you should fully protect them. M S Hassan 📬✍🏻 06:56, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Temporary ECP due to edit warring by five users over either moving the page to draftspace or marking for AFD. EditorGirlAL07 (talk) 08:05, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Actually nevermind, that page has been deleted two minutes after I requested protection for it. EditorGirlAL07 (talk) 08:10, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Johnuniq (talk) 11:11, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. M S Hassan 📬✍🏻 08:10, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 11:13, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Requesting protection for the 2024 Men's Asian Champions Trophy due to repeated disruptive edits by some IPs and editors. They are prematurely adding match scores and removing the official title of the event. Protection would help maintain the accuracy of the page. NiteshTALK 09:12, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 11:20, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 09:49, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 11:26, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 09:50, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 11:26, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent sock puppetry and vandalism (genre change) by IP socks of User:SHUBHAM788 for whom every film is a 'thriller', 'political thriller' or an 'action thriller'. [32] [33] [34]. Similar edits by the confirmed socks [35] [36] and [37] [38]. -. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 10:54, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 24 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 11:34, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: if this page got high views i think it would get protection to protect any frequent vandalism edits in future 2405:9800:B540:1367:6857:39F0:A38B:5A43 (talk) 07:24, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Johnuniq (talk) 11:10, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Constant changing of sourced content to WP:POVPUSH from probable socks and their logged out IP here here and here. cyberdog958Talk 10:32, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @Cyberdog958: I blocked two editors indefinitely and semi-protected for a short period. I'm pretty sure WP:ECP would be permitted but I've forgotten where to look for the justification and I'm in a hurry. Ping me if problems arise at this or any related articles and I will properly investigate the options. Johnuniq (talk) 11:38, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Same IP as the above report on Athisayan. [39] [40] [41] [42] [43] [44] [45]. Similar edits by the confirmed socks [46] [47] and [48] [49]. Requesting a range block. Thanks. -. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 11:09, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 11:40, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Spate of blanking and attempts to the move the page without consensus. Amigao (talk) 13:16, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 24 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 14:12, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. HistoryofIran (talk) 11:04, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. GoodnightmushTalk 11:33, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I want you to not let anybody except admins to edit this page RobertWikia9627 (talk) 12:17, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined ECP seems to be working fine here. I don't see any cause for WP:FULL. GoodnightmushTalk 12:33, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked – ip keeps changing user talk. ModdiWX (You Got Mail!) 14:14, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month by User:Valereee, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Aoidh (talk) 14:48, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent/sporadic disruptive editing of users who've been trying to add flag(s) and maps that aren't accurate, they've been reverted by multiple users. This page has been protected before. Noorullah (talk) 14:36, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Aoidh (talk) 15:02, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I would like to move Draft:MGH Group to mainspace. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 13:15, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done already by Jimfbleak. ~Anachronist (talk) 15:33, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 18:34, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Sockpuppetry. M S Hassan 📬✍🏻 08:39, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Johnuniq (talk) 11:14, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Johnuniq Please check the history carefully, as there has been enough disruptive activity in the past month. [50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57] M S Hassan 📬✍🏻 11:49, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Ad Orientem. for a year. Daniel Case (talk) 18:01, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The article is still being targeted. Two accounts were blocked but the sockmaster has now switched from Hungarian and Vietnamese IPs to Bosnian ones. Looks like someone's got some proxies at their disposal. I reverted the most recent disruptive editing but, nonetheless, I suggest bluelocking the article to prevent its continuation. @User:Daniel Case. Thank you. 46.135.15.226 (talk) 08:45, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Has this been discussed anywhere? If there were a WP:BLPN discussion showing that the disputed edits are considered to be BLP violations, I would be a lot happier applying solid protection. Johnuniq (talk) 11:19, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Johnuniq the IP is trying to whitewash the page and constantly removes the reliable sources and the page has been previously protected here. but right after the protection expired, the same paid IP removed again ties with Russia. the page should be frozen and reliable sources kept. 2A02:AB88:380E:C780:B4DB:ECE7:92A0:E8A7 (talk) 16:54, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator EdJohnston. for two months. Daniel Case (talk) 18:02, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Remsense ‥  15:30, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 17:39, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Reason: Persistent vandalism and a cause of dispute between users (see history). And please let the block be like the ones the user Ronhjones (RIP) used to set. 201.244.117.61 (talk) 17:23, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. GoodnightmushTalk 17:38, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection IP editor continues disruptive editing, persistently adding unsourced information to the lead paragraph of the article despite two previous protections. NJZombie (talk) 14:45, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 18:11, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Pending changes doesn't seem to be working, most edits recently are IP's vandalizing the page. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 14:48, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 18:12, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated RD-level vandalism on WP:GENSEX CTOP article. Request indef semi per arbitration. Raladic (talk) 15:01, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 15:18, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: IP disruption, falls under WP:RUSUKR. Mellk (talk) 16:38, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at RUSUKR Daniel Case (talk) 18:15, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent vandalism by IP addresses to this BLP since 01:45, 2 September 2024‎. Panian513 18:05, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Frequent IP vandalism 1.64.127.60 (talk) 15:38, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

+1 Reason: The page was disrupted frequently Tagr12 (talk) 15:40, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 221.126.255.66 (talk · contribs) blocked by PhilKnight. Favonian (talk) 16:47, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Permanently increase to Extended Confirmed Protection PhilTheGreatLOL (talk) 16:55, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. No valid reason given. OhNoitsJamie Talk 18:06, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The last protection tag has expired and this page is now being constantly vandalized today. HurricaneKappa (talk) 19:57, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for one month. Escalating from previous protection. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 20:23, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended Confirmed Protection fear of persistent vandalism PhilTheGreatLOL (talk) 17:24, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Not an edit request. OhNoitsJamie Talk 18:03, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism Bora83ns (talk) 14:26, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 77.29.128.0/18 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. from article for a month. Daniel Case (talk) 18:08, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. MAL MALDIVE (talk) 18:14, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I see one recent example of vandalism. Do you have others? OhNoitsJamie Talk 18:17, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 18:22, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Template only has 28 transclusions, not the 1000+ it had when BrownHairedGirl protected it as a highly-used template. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
)
18:53, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected in line with the main template. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 22:43, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

12 September 2024

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent WP:DE. This article has been persistently edited by IPs adding the same disruptive, unsourced, and MOS:TV violation edits since at least April of this year. The various IPs (or one person IP hopping) never uses edit summaries, never explains their edits, never responds to talk page warnings, and just ends up getting blocked. An example of edit you'd see would be this, which includes: deletion of a citation to support genre, addition of unsourced genres (which usually are disambiguation links), deletion of explanatory hidden notes to hopefully stop DE, changing season/episode count before said season/episode actually airs (MOS:TV violation), adding unsourced casting/production information for yet-to-air seasons, and various other MOS:TV violations. Drovethrughosts (talk) 20:43, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:51, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. Ymblanter (talk) 20:51, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism and disruptive editing. MNWiki845 (talk) 21:56, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 00:27, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Wburrow (talk) 22:16, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. GoodnightmushTalk 00:25, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Untamed1910 (talk) 21:25, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Also within the scope of WP:CT/AP. GeorgeMemulous (talk) 21:32, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Muboshgu. Favonian (talk) 05:39, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent IP vandalism and disruptive editing. Rhain (he/him) 21:48, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – several ips are making a mess. Mason (talk) 23:04, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. GoodnightmushTalk 00:24, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Remsense ‥  03:44, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ad Orientem. Favonian (talk) 05:39, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level persistent IP vandalism, disruptive editing and has removed the reference sources that have been listed by silly person trolls like User:Anwegmann. Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – several ips are making a mess. Would like longer protection period than one month. Hesselink (talk) 01:55, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. OhNoitsJamie Talk 03:01, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level persistent IP vandalism, disruptive editing and has removed the reference sources that have been listed by silly person trolls like User:Fix.bkl. Would like longer protection period than one month. Bagusekaf07 (talk) 02:46, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. OhNoitsJamie Talk 03:01, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 06:40, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 06:53, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 06:40, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 06:54, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 06:41, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 06:53, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 06:41, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 06:54, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 06:41, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 06:53, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 06:41, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 06:54, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 06:42, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 06:54, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 06:48, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 06:54, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qzd (talk) 03:40, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 07:01, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 06:49, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 06:57, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 06:49, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 06:57, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 06:58, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 07:02, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism along with baseless edits. MNWiki845 (talk) 20:48, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 07:16, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 21:40, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 07:17, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 07:04, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 07:18, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 07:08, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 07:20, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 07:09, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 07:22, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP Policy Violations. Abo Yemen 09:28, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Abo Yemen: Please identify the BLP problems with a diff or at least a timestamp from the article history. The situation might be resolved with the discussion on article talk? Johnuniq (talk) 11:24, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This article, which is about a living arab family, is currently getting lots of edits from indonesia, where almost all edits are about trying to disprove the family's lineage by basically doing WP:OR, or when they "cite" a source it's either a FamilyTreeDNA database which says nothing that supports what the indonesian editors are claiming, or some indonesian unreliable sources where the authors of the blogs they cite are not mentioned or, when it is mentioned, are not experienced in the subject. Just take a look at the sources used in the Ba 'Alawi sada#Disputes and rebuttals section please Abo Yemen 11:43, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. There have been no further edits and no indication of which particular edit was a BLP problem but to move this on I protected it for a short period. Johnuniq (talk) 11:08, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — Czello (music) 21:09, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 09:05, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated vandalism from ip adresses in the past few days. Diffs (1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9) Yvan Part (talk) 08:13, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Zzuuzz. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 09:01, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. M S Hassan 📬✍🏻 08:55, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 12:12, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There's an IP changing editor, a block evasion, that has been going on for months. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 11:07, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. If that still doesn't prove to be long enough, just ping me. GoodnightmushTalk 12:06, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High level of IP vandalism. Broc (talk) 13:30, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 13:41, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – I recently went through history of this page, I edited it and contributed a significant portion of its modern history in past, but after that I forget to keep a tab on it. Now, I can see that some ips have done numerous disruption in December and September months, like [58] here. But, after that someone also made useful contribution. This page is not patrolled by the patrollers and many disruptive edits goes unnoticed, making it very difficult to maintain quality of the page. Hence this need pending change protection, so that such disruption can be tracked. Admantine123 (talk) 04:00, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. GoodnightmushTalk 12:15, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Edit warring like behaviour. Thewikizoomer (talk) 08:23, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. GoodnightmushTalk 12:14, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from IP accounts, such as blanking pages. JustARandomEditor123 (talk) 10:51, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. GoodnightmushTalk 12:06, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. As per WP:CT/IPA Wikibear47 (talk) 07:23, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Not yet logging as WP:ARBIPA , but noted in the protection summary, and probably to be applied next if and/or additional problems are shown. El_C 16:06, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Request raising protection to indef semi, the edit log is just a continuous back and forth of IP disruption/vandalism in this CTOP WP:ARBPS / WP:GENSEX article, so request raising per arbitration to stop this. Raladic (talk) 15:16, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done and logged. El_C 16:11, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:A/I/PIA. nableezy - 16:07, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done and logged. El_C 16:14, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Recent user with multiple accounts removing information and references, trying to overly-simplify the page. ObeliskII (talk) 19:14, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Favonian (talk) 19:42, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to request to slightly modify my comment to include "I have reported the user to T&S team". Ahri Boy (talk) 11:04, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done – Matter is moot, as the account is now both indef blocked on this Wikipedia and globally locked. Favonian (talk) 15:06, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On April 21, 2022, according to Forbes Magazine, Zelenskyy was worth roughly $20 million (US Dollars), based on reporting by Forbes Ukraine. Additional reporting by Forbes US puts that number at less than $30 million despite social media reports claiming he’s a billionaire. The Real Bob D Builder (talk) 16:42, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If Forbes is saying it, then mayhaps you could show your work by linking to the relevant article(s)? It'd make this request easier to do (given that this article falls into two CTOPs). —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 16:53, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not done – Your edit request in this regard has been rejected: Special:PermaLink/1245335398#Extended-confirmed-protected_edit_request_on_11_September_2024. Favonian (talk) 15:13, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Periodic vandalism by various IPs and newly-registered editors. Vandalism apparently has been ramping up since the beginning of August. Skywatcher68 (talk) 16:17, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please enforce WP:CT/AP and, if possible, WP:CT/R-I IanDBeacon (talk) 16:48, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 20:52, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – +WP:CT/AP. Leonidlednev (T, C, L) 17:42, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support, the page got rid of semi-protection and was immediately vandalized. 2600:100E:B094:82D4:FC7F:4FDB:8311:CCD1 (talk) 18:25, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 20:59, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Recent IP vandalism BBQboffingrill me 19:05, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 21:03, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Changeworld1984 (talk) 19:52, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 20:35, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Continued disruption after page was protected twice. – sbaio 19:54, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will leave CTOPS notice on talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 20:45, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Per WP:RUSUKR. Disruptive editing by non-XC editors on a documentary film specifically about the war. Mellk (talk) 17:54, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected Ymblanter (talk) 21:08, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Similar issues as the ones which led to the main article being protected for two weeks. Skywatcher68 (talk) 19:48, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected Ymblanter (talk) 21:16, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – LTA target since 03:15, 9 May 2024‎. Alith Anar 20:02, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected Ymblanter (talk) 21:15, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – LTA target since 18:53, 8 August 2024‎. Alith Anar 20:03, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:13, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – LTA target since 14:18, 31 May 2024‎. Alith Anar 20:03, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:12, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – LTA target since 18:52, 8 August 2024‎. Alith Anar 20:05, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:11, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Slow vandalism, would recommend pending changes. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 16:50, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 21:23, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Very long history of ip and SPA vandalism that picked up after the previous protection expired. - Hipal (talk) 17:58, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will leave CTOPS notice on talk. Daniel Case (talk) 21:27, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Aintabli (talk) 18:04, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS under WP:CT/KURD Daniel Case (talk) 21:32, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Waxworker (talk) 05:58, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 21:40, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism in the past week. MrBatteryBrain (talk) 16:22, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 21:42, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – 1 months. Adnan (ᵀᵃˡᵏ) 16:45, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 21:44, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

13 September 2024

Extended confirmed protection: Page is constantly being edited by sockpuppets of Srimonbanik, please provide extended protection to this page, as it is being changed by several accounts (sockpuppets). ZenDragoX (User) | (Contact) 04:46, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. I have blocked both socks indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 21:14, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – High vandalism by IP and autoconfirmed users. Continued restoration of sock edits. ZenDragoX (User) | (Contact) 04:57, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: Mam Bong Tm (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 21:17, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Continued sock evasion in article. ZenDragoX (User) | (Contact) 04:58, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. As with above. Daniel Case (talk) 21:18, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – High vandalism in article and sockpuppetry. ZenDragoX (User) | (Contact) 05:00, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Socks blocked. Daniel Case (talk) 21:19, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – This political incident is best covered in articles about Trump & the 2024 election. A "See Also" link can be has been added. – S. Rich (talk) 18:00, 12 September 2024 (UTC) 18:26, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I understand the concern, but there haven't been any reverts of late. Daniel Case (talk) 21:01, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent spike in vandalism from new account since 11:58, 11 September 2024‎. Alith Anar 19:18, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Both accounts responsible have been indeffed. Daniel Case (talk) 21:05, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The WP:SNEAKY IP-hopping vandal(s) noticed that the recent protection expired. Skywatcher68 (talk) 19:34, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 186.134.80.0/21 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for a month. Daniel Case (talk) 20:34, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Extended confirmed protection. Continued sock evasion in article.  oncamera  (talk page) 17:44, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: Pumpkin at10 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 21:38, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Leonidlednev (T, C, L) 21:36, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: Paulioua (talk · contribs) blocked by Asilvering. Indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 21:46, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing and vandalism. M S Hassan 📬✍🏻 04:09, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Elli (talk | contribs) 04:36, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IP keeps on changing the location again and again without any source or reason resulting in edit warring. Thewikizoomer (talk) 04:01, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Thewikizoomer: How is it known that the IP is wrong? The infobox at Vijayawada says its International Airport is Vijayawada Airport. Johnuniq (talk) 11:13, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
But the location is Gannavaram though Thewikizoomer (talk) 16:01, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Lectonar (talk) 06:56, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated removal of sourced content by SPA. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 09:50, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator JBW. Favonian (talk) 10:44, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued spate of vandalism. Amigao (talk) 12:56, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected I think this is likely going to have to be dealt with through range blocks because there are so many targeted pages, but protected for now anyway. GoodnightmushTalk 13:05, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent persistent vandalism from similar IPs (after another IP was range-blocked yesterday, they continued today on a different IP range with the exact same edits). Felida97 (talk) 13:01, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I think this is likely going to have to be dealt with through range blocks because there are so many targeted pages, but also protected for now. GoodnightmushTalk 13:05, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of disruptive editing from a lot of editors, I can't even figure out when the last good edit was.  miranda :3  02:36, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bbb23 (talk) 15:03, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism, frequently from TikTok users who have had their accounts suspended and are lashing out. Amigao (talk) 12:54, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Elli (talk | contribs) 14:42, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from IP addresses and new accounts since 03:40, 11 September 2024. Alith Anar 13:57, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Kinu. Elli (talk | contribs) 14:43, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent persistent vandalism from similar IPs (IP hopping; continued today even after two ranges were blocked yesterday). Felida97 (talk) 12:49, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Side note: An even larger range, 2003:EE:9F00:0:0:0:0:0/42, was blocked today (after this request was made) but, to be safe, a bit of page protection would probably be a good idea, considering that the multiple previous range blocks (all of which were active when the edits today were made) didn't hinder them enough and the changes frequently include redirects, which obv have quite the drastic impact if the changes go unnoticed even for a short amount of time. Felida97 (talk) 15:55, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Goodnightmush. Favonian (talk) 17:06, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent persistent vandalism from similar IPs (IP hopping; continued today even after some ranges were blocked yesterday). Felida97 (talk) 12:52, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Side note: An even larger range, 2003:EE:9F00:0:0:0:0:0/42, was blocked today (after this request was made) but, to be safe, a bit of page protection would probably be a good idea, considering that the multiple previous range blocks (all of which were active when the edits today were made) didn't hinder them enough and the changes frequently include redirects, which obv have quite the drastic impact if the changes go unnoticed even for a short amount of time. Felida97 (talk) 15:55, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Goodnightmush. Favonian (talk) 17:06, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Remsense ‥  13:47, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator ComplexRational. Favonian (talk) 17:06, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: ip vandalism after dolphins announced he got a concussion 45BearsFan (talk) 15:14, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Elli (talk | contribs) 15:29, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Frequent targets of Srimonbanik2007 socks, semi-protection has not helped much. Ravensfire (talk) 15:25, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Elli (talk | contribs) 15:28, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Repeated sockpuppetry by Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Wisdom-inc. 10mmsocket (talk) 10:20, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 14:57, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: An IP made vandalism despite the fact the sources are clear that he became special assistant on 12 August, then have been given adviser status on 16 August Panam2014 (talk) 22:22, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 14:58, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: For the past few months and years this page gets vandalized by IP address accounts and I just think this page deserves some protection for that. Whatcha gotta say? :) -ThaFDA (talk) 03:23, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. GoodnightmushTalk 14:47, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This marks a significant moment in the history of the Bangladeshi people. It was the first step towards reclaiming control of their country from the hands of what they perceived as the authoritarian rule of Sheikh Hasina. The ‘India Out’ campaign was successful for these reasons, and now many are attempting to falsely claim credit and erase this history. Therefore, it is crucial to make this a semi-protected article to preserve its integrity. Syed Abu Shanjid Rafin (talk) 14:03, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Elli (talk | contribs) 14:44, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs adding non-notable Tom Merriman to staff list. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 14:15, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. GoodnightmushTalk 14:48, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Untamed1910 (talk) 02:31, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Bbb23 (talk) 15:00, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ban evasion by User:TyMega. Binksternet (talk) 06:06, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Bbb23 (talk) 15:05, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Insertion of WP:NOTNEWS content by IP sock of LTA [59] Borgenland (talk) 07:32, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 15:06, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent sockpuppetry. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TyMega. HorrorLover555 (talk) 11:32, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Bbb23 (talk) 15:06, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. IP removing citations without reason and general disruptive editing. PadFoot (talk) 11:33, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 15:07, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Protection needed since the city was recently renames, and users and IPs are making changes in violation of WP:COMMONNAME. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 13:24, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Page-move protection is also required. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 13:52, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Already move protected. Favonian (talk) 18:03, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. AmritR012 (talk) 10:17, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 18:16, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing MAL MALDIVE (talk) 11:43, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 18:46, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This article has been subject to vandalism and the addition of information that is not cited by the sources, and any information added is not found in the sources indicated. There is obviously a WP:SOCK hiding under all these accounts. Please block all of these accounts and protect the article because I can't update the article because my edits are always being canceled. Thanks!Walter286, Special:Contributions/NRGFanGirl, Special:Contributions/Ham7593, Special:Contributions/Herktik78, Special:Contributions/OneFootball925, Special:Contributions/Herectics35, Special:Contributions/Waouh7293, Special:Contributions/Helmut04687, Special:Contributions/Wiiiizzzz. Plugaru (talk) 11:57, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

We informed you, if you force to remove every contribution, we may have to block your account and go into court with your IP address.
For information, Plugaru is non neutral third party working to remove every contribution that has been done in the past. We flagged the profile. Thank you. Herectics35 (talk) 15:10, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. Bbb23 (talk) 15:20, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – The capital city Port Blair was recently renamed, which caused IPs and even extended confirmed IDs, who are probably unaware of the WP:COMMONNAME policy to change the name violating the said policy - [60] [61] [62] [63] [64] [65] -. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 13:50, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

More edits violating WP:COMMONNAME related to Port Blair name change [66] [67]. Pining @Favonian:. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 18:12, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator RegentsPark. Favonian (talk) 18:57, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 14:01, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 19:06, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Multiple IP6 addresses appear to be in an edit war where one has a list of the episodes for this TV series and then another IP address changes the article to a REDIRECT page. This has occurred numerous times. Since the timings are days apart, it might be helpful to protect it for a a couple weeks. Thoughts?. — Mr Xaero ☎️ 14:04, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 19:08, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Wiki talk pages are not meant for legal/local campaigns. There's currently happening a lot of disruptive editing on the talk page from a bulk of IPs. ─ Aafī on Mobile (talk) 14:19, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Will also log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 19:11, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Similarly protected article as well. Daniel Case (talk) 19:17, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP pushing placement of picture in lead Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 14:47, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done Added article to existing partial block on 117.231.194.0/24 (block range · block log (global) · WHOIS (partial)) Daniel Case (talk) 19:20, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Repeated addition of unsourced information. Proper sources are absent everytime (actually, there was no time when the article had a proper sourcing). Imperial[AFCND] 15:41, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will leave CTOPS notice on talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 19:24, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Turns out I already put one there ... Daniel Case (talk) 19:25, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Frequent vandalism. Myrealnamm's Alternate Account (talk) 15:53, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 19:27, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from similar IPs (IP hopping; continued today even after some ranges were blocked yesterday and today; an even larger range, 2003:EE:9F00:0:0:0:0:0/42, was blocked today but, to be safe, a bit of page protection would probably be a good idea, considering that the multiple previous range blocks, all of which were active when the edits today were made, didn't hinder them enough and the changes frequently include redirects, which obv have quite the drastic impact if the changes go unnoticed even for a short amount of time). Felida97 (talk) 15:56, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will leave CTOPS notice on talk Daniel Case (talk) 20:05, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Continued vandalism by 151.60.177.126 (talk · contribs · WHOIS), probably identical to Alebir (talk · contribs) and 151.60.187.14 (talk · contribs · WHOIS), for further details see the 2 requests from February for the same page. Mai-Sachme (talk) 17:56, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 20:21, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – WP:LTA/FUERDAI target since 18:58, 15 August 2024‎. Alith Anar 19:56, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Elli (talk | contribs) 20:21, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – WP:LTA/FUERDAI target since 01:05, 13 September 2024‎. Alith Anar 19:57, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Elli (talk | contribs) 20:21, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – WP:LTA/FUERDAI target since 19:00, 15 August 2024‎. Alith Anar 19:58, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Elli (talk | contribs) 20:21, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Constant unexplained removal of material by anon IPs. Vjmlhds (talk) 22:32, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2601:248:517F:4FD0:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for six months as a likely TVFAN24 sock Daniel Case (talk) 18:21, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Constant and unexplained removal of material by anon IPs. Vjmlhds (talk) 22:34, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2601:248:517F:4FD0:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for six months as a likely TVFAN24 sock Daniel Case (talk) 18:22, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent restoration of a poorly-sourced "Controversies" section by IPs. Hatman31 (he/him · talk · contribs) 20:51, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:04, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Moxy🍁 03:06, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2409:4042:4D00:0:0:0:0:0/40 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case . for a week; this is not the only article they've been creating problems on. I'd also look closely at VolgaDnper1488, who made exactly the same edit and then hasn't edited since (and has that very possible white-supremacist dogwhistle at the end of their username). Daniel Case (talk) 18:36, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content and vandalism editing by User:42.153.130.67– IP keeps on changing the by changing silly things again and again without any source or reason resulting in edit warring. Hesselink Bagusekaf07 (talk) 04:20, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Srimonbanik2007 socks targetting article. Ravensfire (talk) 12:34, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent persistent vandalism (same edits) from similar IPs (IP hopping; continued today even after some ranges were blocked yesterday). Felida97 (talk) 12:53, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Side note: An even larger range, 2003:EE:9F00:0:0:0:0:0/42, was blocked today (after this request was made) but, to be safe, a bit of page protection would probably be a good idea, considering that the multiple previous range blocks (all of which were active when the edits today were made) didn't hinder them enough and the changes frequently include redirects, which obv have quite the drastic impact if the changes go unnoticed even for a short amount of time. Felida97 (talk) 15:55, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Outside of the two blocked ranges I'm not seeing much other disruption in the last few months. Daniel Case (talk) 18:58, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Untamed1910 (talk) 13:34, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2601:46:600:1566:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by ScottisFinnishRadish. for 31 hours. Daniel Case (talk) 19:01, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Well-intentioned IP editors keep misinterpreting the articles about Peat's death and changing his DoD -- he died from his injuries two weeks after being struck by a car, which they interpret to mean "he died that day and the news broke two weeks later.". — GhostRiver 13:53, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 19:03, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from similar IPs (IP hopping; continued even after multiple IP ranges were blocked yesterday and today). Felida97 (talk) 15:35, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Side note: An even larger range, 2003:EE:9F00:0:0:0:0:0/42, was blocked today (before this request was made) but, to be safe, a bit of page protection would probably be a good idea, considering that the multiple previous range blocks (all of which were active when the edits today were made) didn't hinder them enough and the changes frequently include redirects, which obv have quite the drastic impact if the changes go unnoticed even for a short amount of time. Felida97 (talk) 15:55, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Again I don't see much disruption over the past few months outside the two blocked ranges Daniel Case (talk) 19:21, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

14 September 2024

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from similar IPs (IP hopping; continued today even after some ranges were blocked yesterday and today; an even larger range, 2003:EE:9F00:0:0:0:0:0/42, was blocked today (before this request was made) but, to be safe, a bit of page protection would probably be a good idea, considering that the multiple previous range blocks, all of which were active when the second batch of edits today were made, didn't hinder them enough and the changes frequently include redirects, which obv have quite the drastic impact if the changes go unnoticed even for a short amount of time). Felida97 (talk) 16:01, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please enforce WP:CT/EE. IanDBeacon (talk) 17:45, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Again, most recent disruption has been dealt with. Daniel Case (talk) 20:07, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from similar IPs (IP hopping; continued today even after some ranges were blocked yesterday and today; an even larger range, 2003:EE:9F00:0:0:0:0:0/42, was blocked today (before this request was made) but, to be safe, a bit of page protection would probably be a good idea, considering that the multiple previous range blocks, all of which were active when the second batch of edits today was made, didn't hinder them enough and the changes frequently include redirects, which obv have quite the drastic impact if the changes go unnoticed even for a short amount of time). Felida97 (talk) 16:04, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Per other requests by this editor with exactly the same wording. Daniel Case (talk) 20:09, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism by IPs. Borgenland (talk) 16:26, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 20:12, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Numerous unconstructive edits from IP users. SleepDeprivedGinger (talk) 16:44, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 20:13, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: May be used in a few pages, but one of the pages is semi-protected and highly visible, potentially putting the template at risk. George Ho (talk) 17:02, 13 September 2024 (UTC); edited, 17:05, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Given that there's been no edits to the template in the almost two years since its creation, I'm not worried. Daniel Case (talk) 20:15, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/MappilaKhrais. C F A 💬 14:46, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like plenty of issues in the past, but any reason to protect right now? It's been quiet for a week and the SPI has resolved with blocks. GoodnightmushTalk 14:50, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Declined per above. Daniel Case (talk) 19:18, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I suppose, but it certainly won't be long until another sock edits the article. MappilaKhrais came back today trying to canvass ([68][69]) people into editing for them which is ultimately why I requested this. C F A 💬 20:58, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – See Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Demographics vandal. Binksternet (talk) 17:40, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 49.228.235.140 (talk · contribs) blocked by AmandaNP. Globally, for 2 months. Daniel Case (talk) 20:16, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Not necessarily vandalism but an almost certain case of WP:LOUTSOCK at work that has been disruptive in previous IP edits (e.g., https://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Special:Contributions/51.6.193.169); adding massive amounts of unsourced text. Biohistorian15 (talk) 20:03, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Likely LTA.[70] Biohistorian15 (talk) 20:06, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, the above user left me a strange message on my talk. I am not the mentioned IP editor. The geolocation is completely different and I have nothing in common with the 51.6 IP's edits. Having briefly looked at Biohistorian's edits shows them making repeated frivolous sockpuppetry claims. 90.255.83.64 (talk) 20:16, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Notwithstanding the above. Daniel Case (talk) 20:23, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending semi-protection: Recent repeated vandalism Cabrils (talk) 01:26, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. GoodnightmushTalk 01:55, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Block-evading vandal is constantly closing the AFD inappropriately. There has been two separate accounts blocked already and they've just created a third to go at it again. TarnishedPathtalk 10:16, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 10:57, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kevin Marino

Reason: Remove protection 2600:381:F304:BA4F:75F5:7AC2:8F74:3BA3 (talk) 00:31, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotected. Stop evading your block and get unblocked properly first. ~Anachronist (talk) 00:54, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-Protection: Persistent Vandalism — In addition unsources or poorly sources. 172.56.166.43 (talk) 23:58, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Less Unless (talk) 14:55, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent addition of unsourced content by several IPs and unconfirmed users. This has been occurring for the past several weeks. Please protect at least for a month. CycloneYoris talk! 09:49, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2a0a:ef40:f0b:9801::/64 (talk · contribs). Sent off to join previously blocked Bloomsburybadboy (talk · contribs). Favonian (talk) 11:55, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 11:34, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 11:43, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism by multiple IPs. TarnishedPathtalk 12:19, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Can we set this subtemplate to match the rest of the Template:Occupation by nationality and century category header protections? I'm currently the primary maintainer/developer of this series of templates, but I don't have template editing privileges (nor am I particularly interested in getting them other than to edit this template). Mason (talk) 12:56, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. If you want the template editor right, just ask me, I'll grant it. You've been around long enough, that's for sure. ~Anachronist (talk) 17:03, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 21:29, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"On 1 April, seven aid workers from World Central Kitchen, including British, Polish, Australian, and Irish nationals, were killed in an Israeli airstrike south of Deir al-Balah" is incorrect and should be reworded as

"On 1 April, seven aid workers from World Central Kitchen, including a dual US-Canada national, a Palestinian, three British citizens, an Australian, and a Pole, were killed in an Israeli airstrike south of Deir al-Balah" as per [71], [72]. 148.75.59.49 (talk) 23:26, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. The word "including" followed by a partial list isn't incorrect. Using "including" followed by a complete list makes no sense, and is unnecessary. Using "consisting of" might be better, but the terminology is inconsistent; in addition to "Pole" you may as well say "Brits" and "US-Candadians". ~Anachronist (talk) 17:28, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest adding to 'War Crimes' a section about the Sde Teiman detention camp. The use of concentration/torture camps is a very notable war crime and an important fact as it pertains to the ceasefire negotiations regarding hostage swaps. It is also relevant as many have been taken from Gaza and are being tortured under pretext of "interrogation." Jdftba (talk) 08:36, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done because the request is too vague. The administrators monitoring this page are not involved with that article. You need to make a specific request, in the form "change X to Y" or "add X after Y" or something similar, with appropriate citations. ~Anachronist (talk) 17:08, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Under "casaulties and losses" Under "Syria" Add these events: https://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory/israel-carries-intense-strikes-central-syria-killing-4-113503912 https://apnews.com/article/israel-syria-strikes-hama-iran-hezbollah-916f12c8f1fae066439733c2c0ba9980 Adjust total death toll accordingly. Beri98 (talk) 13:09, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done because the request is too vague. Make a specific suggestion in the form "change X to Y" or "add X after Y" with the exact text you are proposing including citations. ~Anachronist (talk) 17:10, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

15 September 2024

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Ratnahastin (talk) 02:38, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 22:28, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. GoPurple'nGold24 05:04, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 22:54, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 21:06, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:12, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2600:100C:B0AA:D2E1:8B5:A45F:FCD1:91C4 (talk) 20:49, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ymblanter (talk) 21:13, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Whyatt Beanstalk/Super Why (voiced by Nicholas Castel Vanderburgh in season 1, Nicholas Kaegi in season 2, and Johnny Orlando in season 3) 2601:152:5081:CB20:3309:33E9:B9F8:4ADE (talk) 20:20, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Talk:Super Why! is not protected. Remember to include reliable sources supporting your claim. Favonian (talk) 20:58, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Season 5 2018-19 2601:152:5081:CB20:3309:33E9:B9F8:4ADE (talk) 20:21, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Talk:Paw Patrol is not protected. Remember to include reliable sources supporting your claim. Favonian (talk) 20:59, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent addition of unsourced/speculation edits by numerous IP users. Best to keep this article protected until January 2025. Areaseven (talk) 01:08, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 22:21, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent addition of unsourced/speculation edits by numerous IP users. Best to keep this article protected until January 2025. Areaseven (talk) 01:08, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 22:23, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Unrelenting vandalism for months by IP users. Swinub 04:27, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2601:145:80:C0F0:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for two weeks. Daniel Case (talk) 22:42, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Unrelenting vandalism for months by IP. Sush150 (talk) 05:56, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:44, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 06:24, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Will also log as CTOPS action. Daniel Case (talk) 02:50, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Several IPs continuing to add broadcast information for Malaysia despite repeated removal. RunningTiger123 (talk) 06:58, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Just being on the safe side due to earlier one-month block over socking. Daniel Case (talk) 03:00, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Kovcszaln6 (talk) 08:04, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will leave CTOPS notice on talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 03:04, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit war still going on about a recent (read: 13 September 2024) announced name change. The Banner talk 10:16, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of the duration, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Left CTOPS notice on talk. Daniel Case (talk) 03:10, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit warring over the correct name of Port Blair (per WP:COMMONNAME versus the new one announced yesterday. The Banner talk 10:28, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of the duration, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Left CTOPS notice on talk. (This can be lifted once the RM is settled). Daniel Case (talk) 03:13, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Repeated addition of unsourced and promotional information by IP editors. Tacyarg (talk) 13:02, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 03:20, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: A BLP unambiguously within scope of WP:ARBECR that is being edited mostly by non-EC editors and IPs. It should be extended-confirmed protected. Sean.hoyland (talk) 13:05, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 03:22, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Removal of sourced content and additions of unsourced, including names of people without supporting the specific caste. Keeps edit warring. [73] [74] [75] and many other edits by this person as can be seen in the revision history. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 13:45, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. And logged at WP:GS/CASTE. Daniel Case (talk) 03:31, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Edit warring by IPs. Borgenland (talk) 17:40, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 03:42, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block evasion by User:MariaJaydHicky using IPs from Turkey. Binksternet (talk) 18:12, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 03:46, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – This article is attracting repeated additions of unsourced content, along with an editor (coming from various IPs) who keeps combining paragraphs into walls of text. There needs to be a permanent control on what content is added or changed. Stefen 𝕋owers among the rest! GabGruntwerk 18:41, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 03:51, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. — DaxServer (t·m·e·c) 19:14, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Will also log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 03:56, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Somewhat controversial subject with persistent vandalism from IPs for several months. It is likely to be a perennial vandal target. PCHS-NJROTC (Messages)Have a blessed day. 20:23, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS, under AP rather than PS because that's at the root of this. Daniel Case (talk) 04:02, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Waxworker (talk) 20:32, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 05:22, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This article is the focus of persistent and regular vandalism and disruption by IPs since the Russian-Ukraine war; being a BLP, it should have longer-term (a year) while the conflict is going on. Aszx5000 (talk) 20:48, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at WP:RUSUKR. Daniel Case (talk) 05:32, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – WP:LTA/FUERDAI target since 01:04, 13 September 2024‎. Alith Anar 21:17, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 05:39, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. LR.127 (talk) 21:59, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 05:45, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Nxcrypto Message 00:40, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 05:48, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing from IPs after being protected for a year. Nyescum (talk) 01:26, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 05:51, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Temporary semi-protection requested till end of the election due to persistent disruptive editing from multiple IPs. QEnigma (talk) 02:05, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 05:48, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: User using a different IP trying to vandalize this article again, in a situtation that is already happening for months, so i ask, if its possible to make this article with a much longer protection period or a permanent protection also because its listed as a "good article". This user appears all the time that the protection period ends with a different IP everytime and making the exactly same edit that many users already reverted in the numerous previous times it tried to "edit" the article. Thanks Liimkna (talk) 01:05, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 05:53, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent unsourced changes by IPs. Borgenland (talk) 01:45, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 05:53, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Some vandalism and un-referenced claims being added. This article is a contentious topic some might consider so it will probably bring some trolling within the coming weeks. A semi-protection for a few weeks at least is warranted here I believe. TheOneTwoGo (talk) 02:09, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. As WP:AP2. El_C 05:57, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: High-risk template – Very heavily substituted; a search for its hidden comment returns over 60 thousand results. Charlotte (Queen of Heartstalk) 03:47, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 05:59, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Persistent vandalism – Content removal constantly. SparklingBlueMoon (talk) 12:49, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 160.248.11.216 (talk · contribs) blocked by UtherSRG. for year. The IP itself has also been globally locked. Daniel Case (talk) 03:15, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 13:29, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. The IP and its sock account have been locally and globally blocked for a year. Daniel Case (talk) 03:28, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Same caste POV pushing IP range adding unsourced and removing sourced content / sources, as well as edit warring about it - [76] [77] [78] [79] [80] [81]. -. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 14:31, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2405:201:4016:3138:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Malcolmxl5. For 48 hours. Will leave CTOPS notice on talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 03:35, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing vandalism by a user under various IPs. Bahooka (talk) 17:21, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2600:1005:B23E:ECDF:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Ad Orientem. for a month. Daniel Case (talk) 03:38, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Binksternet (talk) 18:36, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That is a lie, I added a source by Billboard that says they broke up. 2601:47:4880:32E0:8092:4707:4FEF:60A1 (talk) 18:38, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked: 2601:47:4880:32E0:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for a week. Daniel Case (talk) 03:49, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing by socks Johnj1995 (talk) 18:56, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: Bukkie914 (talk · contribs) blocked by Pickersgill-Cunliffe. Indefinitely; the IPs have been blocked as well. Daniel Case (talk) 03:53, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full or semi protection: Edit warring/content dispute. 2600:100C:B0AA:D2E1:8B5:A45F:FCD1:91C4 (talk) 20:45, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This was on 9/11 2600:100C:B0AA:D2E1:8B5:A45F:FCD1:91C4 (talk) 20:47, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Seems to have calmed down since then. Daniel Case (talk) 05:23, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Waxworker (talk) 20:46, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Both IPs. Daniel Case (talk) 05:28, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full or semi protection: Edit warring/content dispute. Similar dispute on rubidium 2600:100C:B0AA:D2E1:8B5:A45F:FCD1:91C4 (talk) 20:47, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 05:28, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Edit-warring going on. A lot of new users are disrupting the article violating the guidelines. Note that the topic is subject to an ongoing disinformation campaign by Indian media. Nomian (talk) 06:06, 15 September 2024 (UTC). Nomian (talk) 06:06, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., let us start with this one and see whether it helps Ymblanter (talk) 07:28, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Nswix (talk) 06:29, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected Ymblanter (talk) 07:45, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: CTOP (Wikipedia:General sanctions/Russo-Ukrainian War) Hoben7599 (talk) 02:30, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. El_C 05:47, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing by socks Johnj1995 (talk) 03:35, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Let's see how the AfD plays out. Daniel Case (talk) 05:56, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing by socks Johnj1995 (talk) 03:38, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. All socks indeffed. Daniel Case (talk) 05:57, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Repeated sockpuppet attacks. PamD 04:04, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. El_C 05:59, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. Again, all socks indeffed. Daniel Case (talk) 06:00, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced and/or poorly sourced information. Dipper Dalmatian (talk) 05:22, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 193.82.246.250 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for 24 hours. Daniel Case (talk) 06:02, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I'm trying to create a translated version for Wikipedia en Español. It was a respectful translation but I can't upload it because of this error: "This page has been protected to prevent editing or other actions." Leandroid (talk) 01:53, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done The English page isn't protected. You'd have to take this up with the admins at the Spanish Wikipedia, where we have no authority. Daniel Case (talk) 06:04, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Ban evasion from the same IP range resuming within a few hours of the previous protection expiring. Belbury (talk) 11:45, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2a0a:ef40:e00::/40 (talk · contribs). 6 months partial block from an extensible list of pages, including the one proposed for protection. This is a recurring problem. Report again if they find a new IP range. Favonian (talk) 12:03, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Recent protection expired, same old nonsense is back again. ♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 13:01, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 13:06, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please update the relationship truth and accept so this has its calmness back because of the other misleading and false information about Adria. Jason Momoa was just hanging around and the other pulled the misleading information off only because of a picture and he is in a marriage commitment already with Nicolle A.Morea and she is being damaged right now for no reason while not being a lie and the other being a lie and please take Adria out and protect the page further, because the other are on who you know what and they aren't normal at all, they are having something and over doing it definitely with damaging people and they damaged over 200 tausend people on the Instagram of Jason Momoa as well and went on Nicolle A.Morea too and even twisted all and really done a big bubu. Adria is not to get to near to and the only she gets near is for the promotional points of the other movie and no dating a marriage committed man who is with someone else. 2A01:599:A30:B2F7:BBD9:EFEF:AFFB:B0BA (talk) 08:01, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done – Block evasion, WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Moreamomoa. Favonian (talk) 08:10, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing since July with regards to the ethnic labelling of its inhabitants. Indefinite protection should also be considered. Semsûrî (talk) 13:52, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 16:41, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. --Another Believer (Talk) 15:52, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Elli (talk | contribs) 16:19, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing by socks Johnj1995 (talk) 16:29, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Elli (talk | contribs) 16:39, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Seyamar(245CMR)💬📜 10:10, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 18:25, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Mike Allen 11:07, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 18:32, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Semi protection: Threat of vandalism has decreased substantially and it is very unlikely that potential vandals will return. Car234 (talk) 14:06, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Car234: This page was protected as Arbitration enforcement under the auspices of AP2 and cannot be unilaterally unprotected here. Appeal the protection at WP:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 15:19, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Talk:Election denial movement in the United States is not protected. Favonian (talk) 15:32, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Constant disruptive editings. Mehedi Abedin 09:37, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Will be logged under WP:CT/IPA. Favonian (talk) 19:02, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Cremastra (talk) 14:20, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 18:47, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – jawiki in Long-term abuse with a w:ja:LTA:LMG is continuous vandalism. Request a Semi-protection. Mt.Asahidake (talk) 15:02, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 18:54, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: protect this deletion query so that only self-confirmed editors participate and not anonymous IPs. Thank you. Alon9393 (talk) 08:02, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Zero IP edits ever. DMacks (talk) 17:40, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Continued sockpuppetry shortly after page protection expired. HorrorLover555 (talk) 19:15, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 20:11, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent sockpuppetry. See edit history and Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Brettandelle. HorrorLover555 (talk) 19:20, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 20:14, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP-disruption, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Moreamomoa/Archive. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 07:16, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. And logged at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 21:21, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended protection: Arbitration Enforcement. Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 10:56, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 21:24, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 11:39, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 103.247.23.192 (talk · contribs). globally blocked for two years. Daniel Case (talk) 21:31, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 21:32, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing IP and new user NPOV vandalism. Wikipedialuva (talk) 11:45, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will leave CTOPS notice on talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 21:34, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Frost 12:32, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will leave CTOPS notice on talk. Daniel Case (talk) 21:38, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism IP by Malaysian troll User:42.153.130.67 and disruptive editing. Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content Hesselink Bagusekaf07 (talk) 13:47, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will leave CTOPS notice on talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 21:45, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: More socking again. After previous protection period recently expired. 73.67.145.30 (talk) 19:35, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Elli. for six months. Daniel Case (talk) 22:07, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent IP disruption from long-term abuse. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TyMega. HorrorLover555 (talk) 20:34, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Arbitration enforcement in AP2. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 21:01, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ad Orientem. for a year. Daniel Case (talk) 22:05, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

16 September 2024

Reason: Protection was originally declined, with Daniel Case blocking socks instead, but this problem is not slowing down. Should absolutely be protected, beyond a shadow of a doubt. JeffSpaceman (talk) 11:15, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism from an IP-hopping vandal over the last month. The IPv6 range seems pretty wide, so I'm not sure if a range block is possible. MaterialsPsych (talk) 20:35, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 23:34, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Regular problematic edits by IP-users; e.g. BLP violation[82][83]. Mann Mann (talk) 21:35, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Will log at WP:GS/PW. Daniel Case (talk) 23:24, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IP keeps adding incorrect information despite being warned on their talk page. Vacant0 (talkcontribs) 12:40, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 21:42, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing by socks Johnj1995 (talk) 16:07, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. All socks blocked; AfD closed as keep. Daniel Case (talk) 21:53, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Sockpuppetry 100.33.107.250 (talk) 19:08, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. All socks blocked. Daniel Case (talk) 21:55, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Socking resumed 100.33.107.250 (talk) 19:08, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. All socks blocked. Daniel Case (talk) 22:01, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Socking 100.33.107.250 (talk) 19:09, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. All socks blocked. Daniel Case (talk) 22:02, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Socking 100.33.107.250 (talk) 19:09, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. All socks blocked. Daniel Case (talk) 22:04, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Socking resumed 100.33.107.250 (talk) 19:09, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. All socks blocked. Daniel Case (talk) 22:04, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: persistent disruptive editing to relationship status2605:59C8:5286:B500:E8F8:FF1:AF20:68A5 (talk) 20:43, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Again, we only handle protection requests on this Wikipedia. I think you're better off going to a steward, since it seems the Greek Wikipedia has no counterpart to this page. Daniel Case (talk) 22:09, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! 2605:59C8:5286:B500:A01D:F991:5D07:463D (talk) 02:10, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 21:54, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 103.247.23.192 (talk · contribs). Globally. Daniel Case (talk) 23:35, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism and edits in infobox without sources Ali aj809 (talk) 00:31, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Elli (talk | contribs) 04:12, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: for the Greek language page - Persistent disruptive editing to relationship status by an erotomaniac woman who thinks she is in a relationship with Jason Momoa. 2605:59C8:5286:B500:E8F8:FF1:AF20:68A5 (talk) 21:36, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined We cannot help you with a protection request at elwiki since we do not have any authority there. Daniel Case (talk) 21:40, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Lectonar (talk) 07:45, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Recurrent unhelpful edits from logged-out users (eg changing to "German victory"). High notability topic so that's likely to continue (largest clash of tanks in armoured warfare history at the time). Suggest PC for low impact. Slowking Man (talk) 00:48, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 08:57, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalism and now the article is being redirected to another page but cant be reverted back by the system , seems disabled by the system Bennysubawa (talk) 03:36, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: no such article exists. --Kinu t/c 03:41, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — Czello (music) 20:49, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I recuse myself from considering this as I've been involved in a discussion on the page. Not the one related to the request, but I think it would be ill-advised for me to be the protecting admin. Daniel Case (talk) 21:04, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. As this is always the same IP in the last days, so I do not think we need to shut down the whole talk-page; WP:UTPROT etc. Lectonar (talk) 07:45, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent low-level IP vandalism. About once a month someone changes his middle name to "Lamborghini". Neither the amount nor the recency matters, it should not be permitted to continue. - Sumanuil. (talk to me) 01:19, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 07:49, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please I want to make a Wikimedia for an artist Mrrodney01234 (talk) 03:30, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Mrrodney01234: That isn't the kind of edit request that this section is for. If you want help with creating a new article, I recommend asking at the Teahouse. jlwoodwa (talk) 04:11, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Wrong venue. Lectonar (talk) 07:30, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Iamsouravrana (talk) 12:20, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to natter, there have been 30+ vandalism edits so far. Can I ask for a push on protection please, if possible. Thank you so much. Knitsey (talk) 13:52, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:08, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Request permanent semi-protection. A massive portion of the edit history is jingoistic IP edits from within the United States scrubbing well-verified and duly weighted information about United States war crimes as well as directly promoting the verifiably false idea that the United States has not committed war crimes. Within the last 100 edits, 27 of them are marked as reverted, and that's likely even an undercount. TheTechnician27 (Talk page) 13:39, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Malinaccier (talk) 14:27, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Leonidlednev (T, C, L) 14:37, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Kinu t/c 14:44, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Various ip's disruptive editing. I think a few days protection might help? Inserting 'greatest' town, 'legendary' etc. Knitsey (talk) 10:00, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I definitely agree, tons of non-neutral edits. I would even suggest a permanent protection just because of the town's name. TryAgainSooner (talk) 12:06, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bbb23 (talk) 17:01, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing; WP:GS/CASTE. Ekdalian (talk) 10:07, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bbb23 (talk) 17:03, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Huge, sudden spike in vandalism from a wide range of IP users. AntiDionysius (talk) 13:06, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bump. Frost 14:13, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator ScottishFinnishRadish. Favonian (talk) 16:12, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – repeated addition of unsourced and/or incorrect content (last edit removed fradulent label claims). Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 03:26, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 16:53, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing. BlueboyLINY (talk) 06:15, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Looks like an edit war between an IP and the OP. No idea why OP requested ECB protection. Bbb23 (talk) 16:57, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent IP vandalism and slow edit-warring. Previously, it was fast edit-warring and COI editing, such as Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/IncidentArchive1090#Legal_threat. 174.89.12.36 (talk) 07:46, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 16:58, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Unreliable information is Published DrRamaKrishnanKalpathySundaram (talk) 12:06, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

+1Reason: Coimbatore Suburban Railway, Incorrect & wrong information is published in the last part of 2nd Paragraph under subtitle #Suburban_Stations as follows However, this connection became superfluous when Coimbatore was directly connected from Irugur side via Pilamedu and Coimbatore North in 1953, and accordingly, this link line was removed at that time. Since the doubling work between Irugur–Coimbatore section is in progress, these double lines will be utilised for suburban traffic if required.[13] DrRamaKrishnanKalpathySundaram (talk) 12:10, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 17:04, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of repeated vandalism and unsourced claims Ali aj809 (talk) 12:12, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined OP is edit-warring. Bbb23 (talk) 17:05, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP Policy Violations. — DaxServer (t·m·e·c) 17:37, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Elli (talk | contribs) 20:05, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Slow vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 17:53, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Elli (talk | contribs) 20:07, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Per WP:CT/A-I. Pachu Kannan (talk) 08:31, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Elli (talk | contribs) 20:14, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive edits from IP addresses since 00:01, 16 September 2024‎. Alith Anar 17:31, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 50 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Elli (talk | contribs) 20:17, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IP range persistently adding uncredited role without providing citation. DonIago (talk) 17:58, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Elli (talk | contribs) 20:10, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 18:13, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected 3 months. Elli (talk | contribs) 20:20, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP vandalism. ♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 07:27, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will leave CTOPS notice on talk page (should have been done earlier given the way this story developed). Daniel Case (talk) 21:23, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Ratnahastin (talk) 07:48, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Daniel Case. after you asked on my talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 21:17, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Addition of sanction WP:CASTE cruft by a network of likely socks (see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Fancy vibēs). Asking for a temp ECP or similar till it subsides. Gotitbro (talk) 13:26, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will leave CTOPS notice on talk. Daniel Case (talk) 20:53, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations – IP-users and some users add unreliable source for her relationship status. Mann Mann (talk) 15:30, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. If IP users are causing the problem, semi is enough. Daniel Case (talk) 21:04, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Will leave CTOPS notice on talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 21:05, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A lot of recent valdalism by IP(s) trying to redirect the page to other pages, which have to be constantly reverted (and the page re-patrolled). Aszx5000 (talk) 16:12, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Lots of new user / IP unsourced and unconstructive edits. Out of the past 50 edits, only a single one of them hasn't been reverted. GeorgeMemulous (talk) 02:13, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 21:36, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent IP vandals. Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 03:45, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

IPs continue changing release date & other unsourced changes... Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 14:57, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 21:51, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 18:12, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I want indefinite semi-protection 174.244.84.83 (talk) 21:17, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 22:03, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 19:13, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 22:09, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

17 September 2024

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 16:27, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 22:15, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Continuous IP vandalism Sparkbean (talk) 17:55, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 129.205.240.79 (talk · contribs) blocked by PhilKnight. Elli (talk | contribs) 20:08, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This article has been vandalized on several occasions over the last couple of weeks, as a result it has been nominated for protection. Steve.A.Dore.4 (talk) 19:31, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Elli (talk | contribs) 19:56, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Sockpuppet IP of Blaxstocatamazon is back and making similar legal threats see Blaxstocatamazon's contributions[84]. Ratnahastin (talk) 14:34, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 49.36.160.0/19 (talk · contribs) blocked by ScottishFinnishRadish. for a month. Daniel Case (talk) 20:57, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: User:Qalandar303 was banned indefinitely less than two years ago (ANI link). Several IPs have been making similar edits to the same page over the last five days, with the same tone of voice on the talk page (e.g. You have been reverted, and will continue to be so indefinitely. If you continue to misbehave, brow-beat and bully, rights are reserved to take furthermore action.).

Please semi-protect for a month. Cuñado ☼ - Talk 16:00, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2001:8003:ED8F:EB00:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for three months. Daniel Case (talk) 21:17, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of personal attacks on my talk-page by different IPs in the last 10 days. Jingiby (talk) 16:10, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 185.96.163.21 (talk · contribs) blocked by Favonian. for two weeks Daniel Case (talk) 21:13, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP 2406:3400:60D:B1E0:6C36:336A:BFD6:40F6/64 persistently edit warring to change the text to be contrary to what the sources say. This IP has already been blocked under this IP but continues to edit on the rest of their /64 (all the same person). Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 09:36, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ETA: I see that their block was, in fact, temporary and expired. But it remains the same disruptive user. Note, for instance, this previous attempt to insert this with deceptive edsum [85]. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 15:41, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked: 2406:3400:60D:B1E0:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for two weeks. Daniel Case (talk) 22:29, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Has been a target before, and with my most recent edits (thoroughly researched, and publicly posted before I made them), I'm anticipating a very high probability of further shenanigans. ShinyAlbatross (talk) 17:04, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. But I will put a CTOPS notice on the talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 21:53, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: addition of poor quality content that conflicts with information that is already in this article. D4R1U5 (talk) 18:06, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Not really seeing anything the editors aren't handling, and also I am hesitant to casually protect an article at AfD as either a) it will deleted and not be an issue, or b) it might keep editors who could add material that saves it from deletion from doing so. Daniel Case (talk) 22:00, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Ratnahastin (talk) 10:47, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 04:24, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article is attracting nonsense from two newly-registered editors and one IP. Skywatcher68 (talk) 00:18, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Bishonen | tålk 00:27, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Arbitrarian editions by IP users.

I think semi-protection (for only auto-user cofirmed) could work. Thank you all. Rey1996ss (talk) 18:03, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done because there is nothing to do. The page is not protected, and this is not an edit request. If this is a request to protect, you put it on the wrong subpage, and also we don't protect to block one side of a content dispute. Furthermore, you have failed to engage in any talk page discussion whatsoever. You have received this answer on User talk:Anachronist already. ~Anachronist (talk) 23:38, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent vandalism and disruptive edits by IPs ongoing for months (ever since 1 year semi protection expired). Since the page is just a list of capitals, no regular edits are foreseen here. Requesting indefinite/ long term semi protection against such IP edits. Dhruv edits (talk) 12:45, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 04:39, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Frequently targetted page subject to sanctioned WP:CASTE disruption; as the page history would denote, unlikely to subside. Gotitbro (talk) 12:47, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 04:45, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High frequency of IP vandalism within the past week. Mellamelina (talk) 21:07, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 04:53, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. GSK (talkedits) 22:40, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 05:06, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. GSK (talkedits) 22:41, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 05:10, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – This article already has "Consensus Required" restriction on it, and multiple XC editors are reverting in violation of established consensus on the talk page (see Talk:Zionism#Revert for a previous round where, at the bottom of the thread, the established consensus about one line was re-affirmed), likely in response to recent high-profile posts on X (e.g., this post by Brianna Wu, this post by Hen Mazzig). (There is also non-XC disruption on the talk page.) Suggest short-term (few days or a week) full protection of the article, and ECP of the talk page, to force XC editors to go to the talk page to suggest changes in accordance with the Consensus Required restriction. Note the article is already ECP'd and the talk page is not protected; I'm suggesting boosting the article to full and the talk page to ECP. TIA, Levivich (talk) 22:48, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Pending changes: Persistent vandalism – There is an annoying IP who insists on repeatedly changing Pia Mia's nationality which was supposedly should be Guam, an unincorporated territory of the United States like Puerto Rico which is also an unincorporated territory of the same, which only sangs several singles as an artist and featured artist and made several extended plays in English when The Gift debuted. 186.6.87.181 (talk) 00:00, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 05:16, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs and SPAs making baseless requests to change far right to conservative etc. Dronebogus (talk) 02:25, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 05:21, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by IP-hopping vandals and new user. Sjö (talk) 06:42, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 07:21, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Anon editors and throwaway SPAs. Wikishovel (talk) 07:06, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 07:25, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – LTA target. Leonidlednev (T, C, L) 07:10, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 07:27, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: His page is already protected but may need another protection. Allan Lichtman has contined to push for updates to his own page, including on YouTube interviews last night, in contravention of Wikipedia conflict of interest rules and the consensus of the page's editors regarding his predictive record. Caraturane (talk) 13:23, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Forgot to add: this is a request for an extension of the protection or whatever you feel is best given the situation. Ever since protection went up, the talk page has been consistent in its view as to his predictive record, as has the related The Keys to the White House talk page. There has not been widespread disagreement about what the pages should say, but he has continued to agitate for the edits on the side for most of the last month (including on his YouTube channel) and there is concern the pages will get edit spammed with edits, against the talk page consensus, once again. Caraturane (talk) 13:27, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm going to hold off on this until disruption resumes. Maybe semi or ecp will be sufficient? Elli (talk | contribs) 16:24, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Declined per Elli above. Protection has only just expired. Daniel Case (talk) 04:49, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism luckymustard (talk) 19:33, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 04:50, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – continuous WP:BLP violations by IP users. NitinMlk (talk) 21:17, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 04:56, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP targeting Maleschreiber (talk) 21:37, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 04:57, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive (and tiresome and unimaginative) editing, mostly to the short description. Moscow Mule (talk) 22:31, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: Plaqueta88 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. from the article, for a week, rather than raise the protection to ECP. Daniel Case (talk) 05:01, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive (and tiresome and unimaginative) editing, mostly to the short description. Moscow Mule (talk) 22:31, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: Plaqueta88 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. from the article for a week, per above. Daniel Case (talk) 05:04, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Repeated unsourced additions by IP editors. Innisfree987 (talk) 22:59, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 05:14, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism Wafflefrites (talk) 04:14, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 05:21, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Needs indef semi-protection due to problematic edits by IP-users. Please see protection log and pending changes log. Mann Mann (talk) 07:56, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected Disruption not heavy enough for semi-protection. Lectonar (talk) 08:25, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This redirect is fully protected because of an argument about whether it should be its own article. This dispute was settled over nine years ago, so this page's current level of protection is unnecessary. Cyrobyte (talk) 19:45, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Spartaz: Protecting admin, back in the day. Favonian (talk) 20:00, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The imposition of a redirect was endorsed at DRV and the advice was to allow a discussion before considering any changes to the level of protection. I guess my question is why do you want to remove the protection? Spartaz Humbug! 12:06, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not unprotected – Please create a sourced version of this article in a subpage or your userspace. When this is done, please make the request again, or ask any administrator to move the page for you. Favonian (talk) 09:09, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: High level of Vandalism and disruptive editing. MAL MALDIVE (talk) 10:34, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 14:20, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Mostly from same individual with different IP address who keeps putting original research contents. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 [𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺] 11:16, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 14:22, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Long term disruption. Shadow4dark (talk) 13:06, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done, as WP:KURDS (again). El_C 14:18, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Permanent semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. Please revdel latest ones. M/ (talk) 14:57, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bbb23 (talk) 16:31, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term abuse from French IPs. Block evasion by Special:Contributions/93.22.133.185. Binksternet (talk) 16:51, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 16:58, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: lots of crystalball violations of rfk buying third charter 45BearsFan (talk) 16:55, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @45BearsFan: I don't see enough of that specific rumor to justify protection, but the recent article history is full of unsourced additions being reverted and the page was recently protected for the same reason. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 17:02, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive edits by IPs and new editors since past few weeks. They keep adding either unsourced or clearly incorrect information again and again. Requesting Semi-protection for 3 months. Dhruv edits (talk) 14:28, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. As WP:ARBIND. El_C 17:14, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: ARBPIA + Lebanon. Borgenland (talk) 14:35, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. As WP:PIA WP:ECR. El_C 17:09, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 14:49, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 17:16, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent uptick in vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 15:11, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 17:17, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article is the target of block-evading IP-hopper(s). Skywatcher68 (talk) 15:11, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 17:18, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent IP vandalism and personal attacks. Ronnnaldo7 (talk) 16:49, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 17:04, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Even after a revert by an admin@Daniel:[86] , disruption is still continuing. Ratnahastin (talk) 10:25, 17 September 2024 (UTC). Ratnahastin (talk) 10:25, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    • I've been pinged in the above comment — I don't think my revert can be taken as any sort of supporting evidence that protection is required. I simply reverted an edit which I believe is against the clear consensus developing on the talk page (even if I'm not thrilled by said consensus personally). That discussion may eventually lead to a different consensus, or it may not. Daniel (talk) 11:34, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Talk-page discussion was started and is ongoing. Lectonar (talk) 14:48, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 14:49, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 18:21, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 15:13, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 17:57, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because there is harmful false information that needs to be changed....... . Am1115 (talk) 14:40, 17 September 2024 (UTC) There is a lot of false information on the page for Zionism that is extremely harmful. Please allow this page to be edited so that the false information can be fixed.[reply]

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. This falls under Wikipedia:Contentious topics, so users must be logged-in and extended-confirmed to edit or discuss this topic. Lectonar (talk) 14:46, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Requesting creation of redirect to The Paz Show; Paz was the animated/puppet host of TLC/Discovery Kids' Ready Set Learn! during its relaunch era (2003-2010). Link was protected back at the end of 2007, and again in January 2012; to those with deleted-contribution access, please remind me if I missed much (more) back then. (Inspired by this contributor's latest article-rescue drive, en route to another DYK pitch soon.) Slgrandson (How's my egg-throwing coleslaw?) 17:56, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done, created the redirect, but I don't see any protections applied to Paz the Penguin. It looks like the create-protection was canceled when I created it. ~Anachronist (talk) 19:01, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 19:21, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Requesting creation of redirect to Warcraft (film), which came out a decade after this link's AFD and four years after its padlocking. (Via this 2011 title blacklist.) Slgrandson (How's my egg-throwing coleslaw?) 18:16, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done, redirect created. ~Anachronist (talk) 19:03, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 19:21, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Zionism IS NOT an ethno-cultural nationalism. It was NOT intended to colonize, but to decolonize regions of the Ottoman Empire that later became part of the British Mandate of Palestine. Hernanle (talk) 12:14, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your request is an assertion, presumably based on your personal opinion. See WP:EDITXY for a guide to writing edit requests in a way that makes them more likely to be accepted. Sean.hoyland (talk) 12:32, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Declined. This is not an edit request, it's just a complaint. You need to write a request in the form "change X to Y" and provide citations to reliable sources for verification. ~Anachronist (talk) 14:30, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to request that... (Please correct the ranking order. As the page states, the ranking is based on the lowest gross, but one entry has been given special treatment. Additionally, it's widely known that the upper range figures cannot be used for ranking, as box office numbers in India are often heavily manipulated. https://www.hindustantimes.com/entertainment/bollywood/brahmastra-box-office-why-there-are-different-figures-for-the-film-everywhere-101663031644806.html https://www.timesnownews.com/entertainment-news/telugu/exclusive-prabhas-salaar-fake-box-office-figures-proxy-booking-scam-decoded-article-106342910 https://www.deccanchronicle.com/entertainment/tollywood/industry-bigwigs-baffled-over-fudged-box-office-figures-878975 https://indianexpress.com/article/entertainment/bollywood/better-ott-deals-fake-perception-rise-in-star-fee-why-bollywood-is-rigging-box-office-with-corporate-bookings-and-what-exactly-is-it-9401271/ https://indianexpress.com/article/entertainment/bollywood/gadar-2s-anil-sharma-says-makers-give-fake-box-office-numbers-buy-tickets-themselves-audience-says-ye-jhoothe-log-hain-8913097/ ) . W170924 (talk) 15:10, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. Vague requests are not actionable. You have not stated specifically what should be changed. ~Anachronist (talk) 17:24, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Anachronist To be specific, in the Highest-grossing films table, Kalki 2898 AD should be at rank 7 and Pathaan should be at rank 6, since it's clearly denoted that the sorting is based on the lower range. Please change that. W170924 (talk) 18:18, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Done, then. Thank you for clarifying. ~Anachronist (talk) 18:47, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks:) W170924 (talk) 18:58, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 19:23, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent violations of WP:BLPRS due to a recent incident. CWenger (^@) 18:05, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. As WP:AP2, WP:ARBBLP. El_C 18:32, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism. 73.67.145.30 (talk) 18:15, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 18:35, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Since the entire Lebanon pager explosion happened earlier today, I have seen numerous edits where people will vandalize the page, and I don't see it getting any better. SirMemeGod18:33, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment This may be due for ECP due to the 2024 Lebanon pager explosions. This has been dragged into WP:CT/AI even when it shouldn't have been, as all of the edits have to do with the aforementioned event on today, 17 September. GeorgeMemulous (talk) 18:36, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Extended confirmed protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. As WP:PIA, WP:ECR (related content). El_C 18:43, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated disruptive edits. Limegreencoral (talk) 18:40, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. As WP:HORN. I find it incredibly unlikely that this page would become problem free in the foreseeable future. El_C 18:47, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated disruptive editing from IPs over unsourced claims. Trailblazer101 (talk) 16:00, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Bbb23 (talk) 16:31, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 18:27, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 24 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 19:56, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Article unrecognizable in form, tone, and content since October 7th 2023 142.147.58.81 (talk) 15:57, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This article was protected under the auspices of a contentious topic (PIA) and cannot be unilaterally unprotected. Appeal the protection at WP:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement or WP:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 16:39, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. This falls under Wikipedia:Contentious topics, so users must be logged-in and extended-confirmed to edit or discuss this topic. Favonian (talk) 17:02, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – An editor is repeatedly restoring an article that was redirected under a 2023 AfD (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Somalia national under-20 football team). The editor is refusing advice to discuss on the talk page or seek a deletion review. Dclemens1971 (talk) 15:40, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I believe the article you're referring to is Somalia national under-20 football team. The article you linked only has had one edit in the past two weeks. GeorgeMemulous (talk) 15:43, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, that's it. The article got reverted while I was filing my report so I think Twinkle sent it from the wrong place. The page creator is now seeking discussion on the talk page so this request may be moot, but we'll see. Dclemens1971 (talk) 15:58, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. @Dclemens1971: You are both very close to being blocked for a WP:3RR violation. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 17:20, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not really a content dispute when there's an AfD expressing community consensus already in place. I know 3RR and I don't go exceed it. Dclemens1971 (talk) 17:22, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
As it says on the edit warring policy: Claiming "My edits were right, so it wasn't edit warring" is not a valid defense. Reaching out to the other editor earlier looks like it would have helped. They seem to have stopped once you did. Anyhow, if they resume, please report it to WP:ANEW. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 17:56, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistant IP sockpuppetry/vandalism. Catfurball (talk) 19:00, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 20:50, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Never ending WP:TENDENTIOUS editing by attempting to remove/alter sourced info. Looks like possible sockpuppetry right now too. HistoryofIran (talk) 20:21, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 20:56, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

18 September 2024

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated budget vandalism. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 10:03, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 20:45, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 14:56, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked blocked by HJ Mitchell. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 18:17, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Continued unsourced/disruptive editing by dynamic IPs. Loafiewa (talk) 17:51, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 20:46, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: 3 IPs have vandalized the page within the last few hours. 73.67.145.30 (talk) 18:13, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 20:47, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism related to the release date from an IP user. Sussywidget (talk) 19:00, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 20:51, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 18:15, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. GoodnightmushTalk 19:55, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I want indefinite semi-protection 2600:100C:B0AA:D2E1:C883:EEE3:6CE5:81FB (talk) 21:23, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please don't change others' requests or comments. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:26, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Nearly every edit on this page has been vandalism, pending changes doesn't seem to be working here. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 21:53, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2601:18E:D100:38E0:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Red-tailed hawk. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 22:49, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – We need indefinite page protection here. An anonymous IP editor has been vandalizing this page from its very beginning. They have removed sourced content in the past, added unsourced material, and so on. I tried to stabilize the situation before, eventually asking for page protection. The page was protected, but in the end, they prevailed. As soon as the protection was lifted, they came back and restored everything to their unsourced version. For almost three years, they have had complete control. They are still active now. It seems to be a single individual as far as I can tell. What's the point of anything then? I think IP editing should be permanently restricted on this page. This is the last time I will invest any of my time trying to bring the article up to Wikipedia's standards. Thank you. Mosesheron (talk) 22:00, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 22:50, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – After a block of a Russian speaking user https://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Special:Contributions/Quebite they editing logged out with a Russian ip. Shadow4dark (talk) 22:25, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 02:37, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing new/IP disruption, little evidence of constructive contributions from such accounts. Geardona (talk to me?) 00:02, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 02:35, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes. Geardona (talk to me?) 01:27, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 02:38, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Soapwort (talk) 02:33, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 02:43, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Daniel Quinlan: is there any way this could be protected for longer? The main article at Kurdistan Workers' Party insurgency is indefinitely extended-protected for the same reasons. Soapwort (talk) 03:00, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Soapwort: Kurdistan Workers' Party insurgency was protected six times before it ended up indefinitely protected. If the disruption resumes quickly or increases, please make a new protection request and a longer duration will be considered. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:05, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

One-month semi-protection: One of multiple pages targeted for disruption by block-evading IP. The Kip (contribs) 03:24, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. 216.208.243.0/24 range blocked x 1 month. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:30, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:30, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

One-month semi-protection: One of multiple pages targeted for disruption by block-evading IP. The Kip (contribs) 03:24, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Daniel Quinlan. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:33, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – First edit after it was unprotected was vandalism. A permanent semi protection on this may be a good idea. Kingsmasher678 (talk) 03:57, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 04:06, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In the subsection of the section "Non-jewish support" titled "Muslim support", it is stated that Al-Jamāʻah al-islāmīyah is considered a terrorist organization by the US. The US no longer considers Al-Jamāʻah al-islāmīyah a terrorist organisation since 2022. This can be replaced by stating that it is considered a terrorist organization by the UK. Guessbuckets (talk) 19:35, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. That isn't what the cited source says (which appears to be out of date). Please specify exactly what the text should say, and what source it should cite. ~Anachronist (talk) 19:47, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Anachronist OK, sorry about that.
Replace
"an Islamist militant group that is designated as a terrorist organization by the United States and European Union,"
(Removing the source as well; it's outdated.)
with
"an Islamist militant group that is designated as a terrorist organization by the European Union and United Kingdom,"
and adding the sources
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dec/2024/2056/oj (for the EU)
and
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/proscribed-terror-groups-or-organisations--2/proscribed-terrorist-groups-or-organisations-accessible-version#list-of-proscribed-international-terrorist-groups (for the UK)
The two sources I added are up to date. The one source listed in the current version is out of date, and the current version also states that the US considers it a terrorist org which is both unsourced and no longer the case.
Thanks! Guessbuckets (talk) 20:32, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Again, Not done. I cannot find Al-Jamāʻah al-islāmīyah mentioned in either of those two sources. I'm all in favor of replacing outdated sources, but the new sources cannot fail verification. ~Anachronist (talk) 23:37, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Anachronist Sorry, I should have mentioned that both the EU and UK transliterate the arabic letter ﺝ for j or g into English slightly differently than wikipedia does: They use a G whereas wikipedia transliterates it to a j. The EU refers to Al-Jama'a al-Islamiyya as "Al-Gama’a al-Islamiyya" in the document I linked. The UK refers to it as "Al-Gama’at al-Islamiya" which is another way of transliterating, but this time they also used a t at the end of "Al-Gama-a" as that is closer to the way it is actually pronounced. They are all used interchangeably but refer to the same organization. If you look up either version of the English transliteration of the name you will get the same results. The wikipedia page for the organization also uses different sources using either of these variations to refer to it. Here's a source giving a few versions of the name in English:
https://www.opensanctions.org/entities/NK-AwRJwBRzr9Mqrbx8JDb8fu/ Guessbuckets (talk) 00:41, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Done now. Thanks for the clarification. ~Anachronist (talk) 02:01, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 05:19, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Photo of former president Donald Trump is outdated. Same photo as from 2016 election page. Replace with current photo from 2024 likeness. 169.252.4.21 (talk) 21:09, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

We are limited to whatever freely-licenced images are available, as Trump is still alive.Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 21:17, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not done. Request is vague and therefore non-actionable. Specify the photograph on Wikimedia Commons for us to use instead, and we can use it. ~Anachronist (talk) 23:29, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism from lots of IPs throughout article’s entire history; likely a constant target. 2603:8080:D03:89D4:65DB:CB9F:8589:443 (talk) 21:38, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 02:36, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

One-month semi-protection: One of multiple pages being targeted for disruption by a block-evading IP. The Kip (contribs) 03:22, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. 216.208.243.0/24 range blocked x 1 month. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:28, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

One-month semi-protection: One of multiple pages targeted for disruption by block-evading IP. The Kip (contribs) 03:23, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. 216.208.243.0/24 range blocked x 1 month. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:28, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalism due to continuous edits denying the fact they are forgeries in contravention of RS. Makeandtoss (talk) 08:44, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. One single disruptive edit in about 5 months time. Lectonar (talk) 09:53, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to request that... (Please consider reversing the recent revision made by the User:Gokul BM. The change in range was made without supporting sources, which has affected the accuracy of the ranking.https://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=List_of_highest-grossing_South_Indian_films&diff=1246147282&oldid=1246147073&variant=en https://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=List_of_highest-grossing_South_Indian_films&diff=1246147073&oldid=1246002411&variant=en) . W170924 (talk) 19:30, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. I don't see any supporting sources given for any of those numbers in the entire table, so there is no reason to believe that the previous version was more correct than the current version. If you have an issue with a recent edit, then discuss it with that editor. ~Anachronist (talk) 19:53, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Anachronist Also, I don’t understand what you meant by 'I don’t see any supporting sources given for any of those numbers in the entire table,' as the Highest-grossing films table is properly sourced except for the entries manipulated by this user. Am I wrong? Did I miss anything? W170924 (talk) 20:49, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Anachronist Pardon me, but to be specific, the ranges changed as follows:

Varisu: ₹290–293 to ₹290–310

Kabali: ₹284–305 to ₹284–499

Beast: ₹227–240 to ₹217–300

Mersal: ₹220 to ₹200–260

Note that before the change, the figures were supported by the references provided in the corresponding ref fields. The new ranges, however, contradict the references because the user did not provide any sources to back their claim. Why is there no consideration of this discrepancy?W170924 (talk) 20:10, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Did you contact the user who made that edit, as I suggested? ~Anachronist (talk) 23:26, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Anachronist I dropped a note on the user's talk page, and from the other threads, it’s pretty obvious this person is a serial vandal. The funny part? A vandal can freely run around editing Wikipedia, but if you want to call them out, you’ve got to perform an Olympic-level gymnastics routine. And don’t get me started on the edit count—it gives the impression they’re some kind of Wikipedia veteran! Sure, Wikipedia might slap them with a short ban, but their edit count stays shiny and impressive, like they’ve been building the place brick by brick. W170924 (talk) 03:21, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The contributions of that user doesn't look like a vandal-only account to me, but more like attempts to get information up-to-date without updating the sources. In any case, the edits have been reverted and I left a short warning on the user's talk page. ~Anachronist (talk) 05:45, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks :) W170924 (talk) 05:50, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Lectonar (talk) 08:53, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

เห็ดแชมเปญ(เห็ดถ้วยชมพู) Zeuzcloud8 (talk) 06:39, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. This is not an edit request, that article doesn't exist, and this is the English Wikipedia. Article titles must be in English. ~Anachronist (talk) 06:43, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Long-term edit warring by several IPs and SPAs. Skitash (talk) 10:35, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator ToBeFree. Favonian (talk) 16:34, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Contains exempt from 2024 Lebanon pager explosions which has extended protection, other editors try to reduce blame on Israel which is not what WP:RS says. PhotographyEdits (talk) 11:42, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator ScottishFinnishRadish. Favonian (talk) 16:24, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Likely kids at the school mucking about who could use a bit of time off. 81.2.123.64 (talk) 13:54, 18 September 2024 (UTC) Reason: The page has been a victim of vandalism for the past hour or two and it does not seem to be stopping. This seems to be part of an effort by people in Hong Kong to vandalize the schools’ pages, as shown in vandalized Google search results for schools in HK when searching with Chinese as the language. 116.48.22.8 (talk) 14:02, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Favonian (talk) 16:35, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Part of the Arab Israeli conflict. Felicia (talk) 15:47, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Elli (talk | contribs) 17:25, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Footnote 1 does not support the description of Zionism. The referenced article states merely that Zionism was once historically described that way, but the citation implies that this is a current definition and a prevailing view. The cited material does not support that view, and use of that reference is misleading and reduces the credibility of the author. VRavenn (talk) 13:38, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done because this isn't an edit request, it's just a comment. The editors monitoring this page are not involved with that article. Vague requests are not actionable. A request should state specifically what needs to change and how to change it, as in "change X to Y" with appropriate sources cited. ~Anachronist (talk) 14:33, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Second wave

Change "civilianz bean attcking" to "civilians began attacking" Fivework (talk) 15:21, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Already done. In this edit: Special:Diff/1246373430. Favonian (talk) 16:01, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 18:35, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Slow vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 15:28, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 19:21, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent sockpuppetry since 07:07, 18 September 2024. Alith Anar 19:31, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 20:50, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent sockpuppetry since 16:05, 18 September 2024‎. Alith Anar 19:32, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 20:48, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism and sockpuppetry since 23:33, 30 June 2024‎. Alith Anar 19:33, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 20:48, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IPs keep changing to unsourced information that is different to what the appropriate section says without a reason. ZZZ'S 20:27, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected Ymblanter (talk) 20:46, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It appears there are a few minor inaccuracies in this entry. For instance, Hungary’s BAC Consulting KFT now claims to act as an intermediary, yet the actual contracted manufacturer has not been disclosed. Additionally, the ‘Sales’ section and the ‘2024 Israeli tampering and explosions in Lebanon’ section contain several inaccuracies and require updates.

please change the "Sales" section and the "2024 Israeli tampering and explosions in Lebanon" section to "2024 Israeli tampering and explosions in Lebanon" section from the Gold Apollo entry.58.152.168.150 (talk) 16:10, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done – You have already made this edit request at the article talk page. That's where the matter should be discussed. Favonian (talk) 16:21, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, it appears I may have made an error. 58.152.168.150 (talk) 16:23, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing from multiple IPs. Annh07 (talk) 08:45, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 19:19, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: User:Saberamir, User:Telepaws and now User:Wijangjo edit warring to add User:Telepaws photo to the infobox, ignoring the talk page thread about the infobox image. Belbury (talk) 11:25, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. @Belbury: It really seems like the previous content dispute over the image is still unresolved. Please work it out. There must be a suitable image somewhere even if it's not one of the images previously used. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 19:19, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I'm really not sure protection is the way to go. Most of the ip ranges are the same as those that targeted Cockermouth and I'm guessing they will just move on to another town?. Knitsey (talk) 18:54, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 19:02, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Lovely, thank you for that. Knitsey (talk) 19:03, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent sockpuppetry since 16:06, 18 September 2024‎. Alith Anar 19:31, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 20:55, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

19 September 2024

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Another IP edit, another round of blatant vandalism (changing the BLP's direct quotation to mean the opposite + changing a location). This under-watched article does not seem to inspire good editing, and I wonder whether it should be semi-protected for a very long time (i.e., long enough for someone to grow up). The last round was three months. WhatamIdoing (talk) 05:48, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 02:22, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated disruptive editing and removal of tags from IPs and socks. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 06:34, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 02:31, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Change a previous attempted assassination of Trump to a previous attempted assassination of Trump Soguyswediditwehita (talk) 19:22, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I just saw that i should have posted this on the article's talk page, my apologizes. Soguyswediditwehita (talk) 19:26, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Withdrawn by requestor – Favonian (talk) 19:37, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The page has been vandalized lately that may cause confusion amongst readers. While the stunt is purely humorous and satiric in nature, the page has been trolled for the past two to three months by anonymous people which defeats the purpose of delivering accurate information to Wikipedia's readers. VDigz (talk) 13:48, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:42, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I'm also ok with pending changes as well. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 14:49, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:48, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – frequent disruptive edits, semi hasnt been helpful, article belongs in WP:GS/CASTE. Sir Calculus (talk) 15:02, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at CASTE Daniel Case (talk) 02:50, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent sockpuppetry. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TyMega. HorrorLover555 (talk) 15:09, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 02:58, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Disturbance caused by IP address Peachyo (talk) 16:28, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 03:08, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Repetitive edit-warring/POV vandalism over the last 2 days ([87], [88], [89], [90], [91]) by what looks like one editor who is now evading a block ([92]) through logged-out edits. Blocking the IP might also be enough. R Prazeres (talk) 16:40, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. There's been a lot of back-and-forth disruption. Daniel Case (talk) 03:24, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – An IP is targetting this article, replacing sourced content and subtley changing the wording, even of direct quotes. I have reverted them a few days ago and see again they made the same edits. I request this page is protected to prevent them from making these undiscussed changes. MaplesyrupSushi (talk) 22:34, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will leave CTOPS notice on talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 03:32, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism, under attack by combination of "pig" socks, IP's, and other users. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 23:31, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will also log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 03:37, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Endless edit-warring from one user in particular saying "Noggin is not gone", even though there is a valid source confirming the brand was shut down in July. This has lasted for over a month, the user even resorting to removing said reference as seen in these edits. It seems like this will continue unless some sort of protection is applied to the page. 2A05:AD00:A:0:352:0:0:1 (talk) 01:37, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 03:47, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – "Dinosaurio" vandalism over the last month. Jalen Barks (Woof) 02:02, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. All three. Daniel Case (talk) 03:51, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated insertion from multiple IPs of unrelated logos, unrelated tags. Nat Gertler (talk) 02:37, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 03:53, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. M S Hassan 📬✍🏻 09:55, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 183.171.191.128/26 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for six months. Daniel Case (talk) 02:40, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Disruptive editing from IPs Spworld2 (talk) 12:03, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 02:40, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Untamed1910 (talk) 00:21, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. There's been one edit in 19 days. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 01:10, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Requsting full protection. Their is high level of IP vandalism. Someone is messing with the page daily and showing unprofessionalism. Krishnpremi (talk) 15:10, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I see no IPs have edited the article recently, and that you are edit-warring on that article. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 15:18, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Declined per above. If you are serious about stopping the edit warring and reaching consensus (which your message above does not suggest you are), start assuming good faith and open a discussion on the talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 03:05, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. User:Namiba 16:30, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 03:19, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 16:45, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. One edit every few days. Seems like it's being handled. Daniel Case (talk) 03:26, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent LTA IP sockpuppetry. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TyMega. HorrorLover555 (talk) 19:26, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. in one case globally locked. Daniel Case (talk) 03:27, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent sockpuppetry. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TyMega. HorrorLover555 (talk) 19:28, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Daniel Case (talk) 03:28, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Yesterday my request was declined due to the absence of recent disruption. But only a day later I have restored the page to a stable sourced version, after considerable hard works, the ip is back, and is trying to restore their own unsourced version. They are going to succeed in the end of course. Who has time to engage in an endless fight? Please restrict IP editing on this page permanently. These pages receive no substantial edits from almost nobody. Trust me, islamic studies is my speciality on Wikipedia. Mosesheron (talk) 01:27, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing by a sock puppet who gets blocked and just come back with a different IP addresses. It started with a user who eventually got blocked and then immediately after they got blocked, they used different IP addresses to get around the block and continue disrupting the page. Hidden notes, warnings and blocks aren't doing anything. Bowling is life (talk) 03:34, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 88.97.197.0/24 (talk · contribs) blocked by Ponyo. for 72 hours. Daniel Case (talk) 03:55, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Over the last fortnight the page has been the subject of various attempts to introduce unsourced promo material "as directed by Dr.José-Alain Sahel" and "on Jose-Alain Sahel's request". Axad12 (talk) 06:24, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 07:11, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
A quick question... Could you indicate for me where in the link provided it clarifies the level of disruptive activity required to justify protection. If so I will take this on board for future consideration. Many thanks, Axad12 (talk) 07:39, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Axad12: I would suggest starting with WP:PREEMPTIVE and WP:SEMI. The last disruptive edit was 6 days ago which is is not especially recent. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 07:51, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
(edit conflict) In general, see our protection policy. But every case is different, and administrators may use their discretion on a case-by-case basis. See Bathos as an example for the level of disruption which has led to semi-protection, e.g. Lectonar (talk) 07:56, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent edit by sockpuppet. Ckfasdf (talk) 07:07, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 07:44, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block evasion by some IPs. Zach (talk to me) 08:08, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 08:37, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent additions of Rapist to article and shortdesc. There's evidently reporting of this accusation given the current news cycle - https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/sep/19/mohamed-al-fayed-accused-bbc-documentary-raping-five-women - but they are just that, accusations. Golikom (talk) 11:43, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 12:50, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent sockpuppetry. JeffSpaceman (talk) 11:46, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected Ymblanter (talk) 12:46, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – multiple IPv6 no given sourced. Abrilando232 (talk) 11:54, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 12:42, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 10:27, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Lectonar (talk) 11:15, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Slow vandalism, would also be ok with pending changes as well. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 13:32, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I want indefinite semi-protection 2600:100C:B03C:515:3C46:EFEF:33F9:22BA (talk) 13:38, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected Even after the last semi-protection ended some time ago, disruptive edits are not very frequent. Lectonar (talk) 14:07, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The protection is no longer necessaery, because changes have been made to the company's structure, and edits are necessaery to the wiki. However one pending has already been made, and there is no such personnel who could accept it. 5.204.172.22 (talk) 12:45, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – This page isn't currently protected. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 12:51, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: I can find no article under that name here in EN-Wikipedia; the only one I could find is at HU-Wikipedia. We can not help you with the one over there. Lectonar (talk) 12:54, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... If the "Note" template gets the last word, archiving will be postponed. Favonian (talk) 15:36, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism in recent days. TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 08:15, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 16:05, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Very high lvl of IP vandalism Dushnilkin (talk) 12:08, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ymblanter (talk) 12:39, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Subject recently got arrested, speculative and opiniated edits by IPs. Thewikizoomer (talk) 16:10, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 16:15, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: New editors and IP-users always changes the definition of this region by adding Afghanistan; causing regular edit warring and mess. Mann Mann (talk) 13:02, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Protection won't solve the underlying problem here. A talk-page discusssion is already taking place; reigning consensus seems to be that Afghanistan is not considered part of Central Asia. Consensus may change, though, and new sources might turn up. If discussion leads nowhere, I guess the topic should be evaluated by holding a RfC. Lectonar (talk) 13:19, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – requesting because of constant IP disruptions spanning almost one month now. Durraz0 (talk) 13:21, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 13:23, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Under attack by "pig" socks. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 16:52, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Elli (talk | contribs) 16:55, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Susbush (talk) 14:16, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 14:23, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Susbush (talk) 14:21, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 14:24, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Vacant0 (talkcontribs) 16:46, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Elli (talk | contribs) 17:22, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: "acts to promote awareness of Israel and the Middle East in the United Kingdom." is wholly misleading and accepts the purported purpose of the journal without quotes to indicate potential bias. The article has essentially no critique of what is a distinctly right-wing journal (IE: there is a major bias in the journal, regardless of left or right affiliation) except for an even more right-wing criticism. Given the clear bias and the unfinished nature of the page, it should really be opened up LordGigapiller (talk) 02:48, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If there is a reliable source for such a critique, please post it here. Daniel Case (talk) 03:57, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. The talk page is not protected. ~Anachronist (talk) 14:18, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Highly obscene and unnecessary messages by IP - https://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Thewikizoomer&oldid=1246488973. Thewikizoomer (talk) 09:21, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:07, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: An IP address continues to make changes describing Meyer as a convicted felon who is on the run. The news articles in question do describe issuing a warrant, but there is no phrasing describing her as convicted felon. This article has had issues over the years (see the talk page), and I expect this behavior will continue moving forward. DaffodilOcean (talk) 17:29, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 17:55, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 14:42, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined This may have been misfiled. Filmssssssssssss, if you're in fact requesting an increase in protection, please go to WP:RFPPI, but at a glance there is not enough recent vandalism to support an increase. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 14:47, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Political article that appears to have had biased information on it. Moreover, the article appears ripe for an edit war and paid writers on it could be possible. Holyapple25 (talk) 03:35, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Favonian (talk) 16:00, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Susbush (talk) 16:02, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Favonian (talk) 16:13, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Frost 18:25, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 18:49, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism Koopinator (talk) 09:50, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Elli (talk | contribs) 17:24, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — GhostInTheMachine talk to me 16:37, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Protection is not appropriate for issues with single IPs. OhNoitsJamie Talk 16:39, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: high level of vandalism Cynthiakaui (talk) 17:13, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Favonian (talk) 17:34, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Addition of unsourced content again and again by IPs and new user. M S Hassan 📬✍🏻 08:18, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 20:35, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Continued re-insertion by IPs of an image which is most likely a copyright infringement. TarnishedPathtalk 09:26, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 20:43, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: False information has been added to the page multiple times, including reference to a nonexistent 'Corporate Communication Manager' named Aidan Ashford and to a nonexistent sub-brand called 'Trade Republica'.

It looks like these changes are being made in order to lend credence to phishing campaigns targeting Trade Republic customers. The supposed 'Trade Republica' branding in particular is similar to phishing domains targeting customers that we have previously identified. We have already reverted these changes several times, but they are quickly added again by the same user, 'Roger Jason Bennett', who has also added a reference to an 'Aidan Ashford' to the page for the European Securities and Markets Authority. Endmost wiki (talk) 11:37, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 20:45, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 13:38, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 20:49, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Waxworker (talk) 14:57, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – BLP vandalism related to https://www.channelnewsasia.com/asia/indonesia-fufufafa-social-media-gibran-rakabuming-raka-prabowo-subianto-4615471 . Skywatcher68 (talk) 15:19, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. And CTOPS notice left on talk. Daniel Case (talk) 20:58, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Resumed dynamic IP same disruption. Geraldo Perez (talk) 15:39, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 21:01, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Immediate resumption after last protect expired. Geraldo Perez (talk) 15:54, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 21:04, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

20 September 2024

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – large edits happening, which is not easy to verify. Aadirulez8 (talk) 19:38, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. You could just revert them first. It's not your responsibility to find sources for others' edits, although it is certainly very kind of you to do it. Daniel Case (talk) 21:06, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistant ongoing WP:BLP violations directly in the lede; the lede is repeatedly modified to not say what the sources actually say. -- Very Polite Person (talk) 19:43, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. AntiDionysius (talk) 21:05, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 21:10, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent unreferenced changing of the name of the composer and lyricist. I googled the name and it had no results linked to Hillsong. Atlantic306 (talk) 21:08, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 21:11, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I requested this page protection request August 30th 19:59 US Eastern on the subject's talk page and was told that they do not protect pages unless there is a high level of vandalism or disruptive activity. I've been carefully following this page's edits for the past twenty days and there has been a high level of disruptive editing. I strongly advise Wikipedia moderators and admins to discuss protecting this page. Butterscotch5 (talk) 17:08, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think you mean September 11 attacks, because the redirect you listed has only been edited 3 times. Babysharkboss2!! (No Life 'Til Leather) 17:59, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Seems obvious. Request changed accordingly. Favonian (talk) 18:09, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Green tickY Babysharkboss2!! (No Life 'Til Leather) 18:18, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Article already semi-protected, and the troublesome editor appears to have stopped. Favonian (talk) 18:13, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If disruption continues, the page will need to be indefinitely extended protected 2600:100C:B03C:515:3C46:EFEF:33F9:22BA (talk) 21:18, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Very important article to biology, specifically taxonomy. It may have vandalism. Interested inTaxonomy (talk) 21:36, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Page is already protected three months ago and will expire on December 23. This page should have been semi-protected indefinitely, not temporarily 2600:100C:B03C:515:3C46:EFEF:33F9:22BA (talk) 21:38, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Elli (talk | contribs) 22:16, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP socks of MAB vandalizing the page. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 00:47, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator C.Fred. @NoobThreePointOh: The alternative is having a different page vandalized. Anyhow, another administrator already protected it. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 02:19, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A target for constant vandalism. Tinton5 (talk) 21:15, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The past 12 edits were from IPs 2600:100C:B03C:515:3C46:EFEF:33F9:22BA (talk) 21:23, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There were a lot of deletions and protections. Just look at the log 2600:100C:B03C:515:3C46:EFEF:33F9:22BA (talk) 21:50, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Protection will go to indefinite 2603:8080:D03:89D4:4A7:324F:D48C:503A (talk) 23:45, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 00:57, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Request for semi-protection: On at least a dozen occasions, I have visited this article to find that a number of the entries on the list have been falsified, and replaced with other entries that did not make the list. I am an avid data collector for music publications such as this, and it is frustrating and disappointing that this keeps happening.

You will see from the article's history that I have on numerous occasions reverted the list back to its correct form. The most recent occasion I was lucky enough to be able to use the 'undo' button before too much other work had been carried out, but most other times I have to go and edit it manually.

May I suggest that this page be semi-protected from being edited from non-Wikipedia members or anonymous IP addresses, and if any Wiki members do try to falsify this list, that they be reported for vandalism and be notified.

Many thanks. Effluvium1 (talk) 23:51, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 00:58, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – article in discussion at AfD, subject of the article/person with the same username keeps removing the AfD tags, twice now. Oaktree b (talk) 00:39, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Bbb23 (talk) 00:59, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – There's not much point in filing an SPI, the sock Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mahir6219 will just jump to another IP, and rangeblock is not really an opinion since the ranges are very busy. In the SPIs it has already been established that the sock use this range to push info by Mahir Khalifa-zadeh at Maiden Tower (Baku). Would appreciate if this could get protected instead. HistoryofIran (talk) 22:32, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ponyo. Favonian (talk) 05:28, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Myrealnamm (💬pros · ✏️cons) 23:24, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Discospinster. Favonian (talk) 05:28, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest the "death" part be changed to assassination Fredd the boy (talk) 21:37, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Talk:Ismail Haniyeh is not protected. Favonian (talk) 05:25, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Long-term IP and SPA vandalism. Skitash (talk) 21:10, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Some of those involved, especially recently, are autoconfirmed. Do you want extended-confirmed protection? Daniel Case (talk) 21:14, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That would be great, but it appears that an administrator has already implemented full protection. Skitash (talk) 21:18, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected. Indeed. Lectonar (talk) 10:01, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: repeated vandalism. ~ IvanScrooge98 (talk) 10:18, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. This is essentially User:Lee xxx, who has been warned already. Lectonar (talk) 11:32, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The registered user has already been warned, but they are not the only one to have engaged in disruption. An IP did too. ~ IvanScrooge98 (talk) 11:46, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 13:06, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 14:00, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. WiiUf ——The dragon travels through the stars 12:57, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. GoodnightmushTalk 13:59, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent sockpuppetry from UnderArmourKid BombCraft8 (talk) (contributions) 14:04, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 16:54, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. WiiUf ——The dragon travels through the stars 14:05, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 16:51, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: CTOPS ARBPIA. Borgenland (talk) 15:10, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 15:28, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Article is within scope of WP:ARBECR and is currently being vandalized by IPs. It should be extended confirmed protected. Sean.hoyland (talk) 15:21, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 15:27, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP vandalism Sebbog13 (talk) 10:58, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. GoodnightmushTalk 14:00, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Leonidlednev (T, C, L) 14:07, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

+1 Reason: Vandalism Trade (talk) 18:28, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 19:31, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – IP-hopper since the beginning of August and a newly-registered self-announced sockmaster. Skywatcher68 (talk) 18:22, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 19:40, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

21 September 2024

Reason: IP Vandalism Cactoideae (talk) 01:44, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 21:52, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There's an IP changing vandal who considers the mention of a non-binary character to be "hateful vandalism". soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 09:13, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) re-blocked. Bbb23 (talk) 21:54, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I hope it can be pointed out on the discussion page that the explosive devices were not limited to Gold Apollo; devices from the well-known Japanese company Icom Incorporated also exploded. 58.152.168.150 (talk) 16:40, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Source? —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 18:42, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The page is no longer protected since the protection was temporary. CharlieEdited (talk) 17:57, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Talk page protection expired six hours ago. A window of opportunity presents itself. Favonian (talk) 18:03, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs returned again with the dispute over highest grossing film. Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 03:40, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 03:26, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Ratnahastin (talk) 10:23, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of disruptive IP and sockpuppet activity. Various SPAs attempt to vote in the ongoing RfC on the talk page, disrupting the consensus-building process.[93][94][95][96][97] Skitash (talk) 10:51, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 03:31, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP Vandalism from individuals seeking to obscure the shady elements of this corporation. BrandenJames (talk) 00:08, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) 02:25, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Longterm interference by US IPs, particularly reinsertion of a bloated "See also" section despite various reverts and user warnings. A quick check of their contributions makes it highly likely that these are all the same person. I would request indefinite page protection for the time being. Biohistorian15 (talk) 12:52, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Will also log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 03:42, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism. Further protection needed for a longer duration. Amigao (talk) 13:30, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 03:54, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Leonidlednev (T, C, L) 17:01, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 03:56, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Article falls under WP:ARBECR and it is currently being flooded by IPs making disruptive edits. Ïvana (talk) 17:17, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. And logged at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 04:00, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruptive editing by IPs. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 20:15, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 04:06, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism due to a running joke made in the final episode of The Grand Tour. TarnumJ (talk) 21:07, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:08, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The revision history of the article shows numerous reversions of vandalism caused by IP editors and newly created accounts almost every month going back to December 2023. Since April 2024, this appears to have become even more frequent. This page has been protected multiple times since 2017, including a 3-year page protection from 2020 to February 2023. A long-term temporary protection, or at this point even indefinite protection, would be useful. – notwally (talk) 22:43, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 04:15, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs keep 1) adding an album yet to be released or formally announced 2) removing the hidden note that says not to add it. Doc StrangeMailboxLogbook 22:56, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:20, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ip and new accounts vandalising the article. Fake death, fake websites etc. BLP violations. Knitsey (talk) 01:01, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 04:24, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Multiple removal of templates by global locked spammers and sockpuppets and IP El-chupanebrej (talk) 02:14, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will leave CTOPS notice on talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 04:32, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive IP edits regarding the attraction's unconfirmed future. Tvfunhouse (talk) 02:41, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:40, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Three hijacking attempts in two days by two users. GoingBatty (talk) 03:12, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:43, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated unconstructive edits from IPs. Trailblazer101 (talk) 03:40, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This protection is going to indefinite 2603:8080:D03:89D4:F840:EDB3:7AD8:B838 (talk) 04:07, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:48, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing from IP. Disruptive editing immediately resumed after unprotection2603:8080:D03:89D4:F840:EDB3:7AD8:B838 (talk) 04:09, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:52, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Consistent editing by an IP user to change table averages to use mid-range values despite most users using arithmetic mean, and talk page discussion to build consensus around this. This occurs several times a day (15 in the previous 24 hours).

There has also been some recent vandalism. 103.8.18.128 (talk) 21:39, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please enforce WP:CT/AP. IanDBeacon (talk) 21:39, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked: 159.250.17.61 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. from the article for one week. Daniel Case (talk) 03:13, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 23:10, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Content Dispute and Disruptive Editing WP:CT/AP 2601:282:4700:272:EC:9C58:DF8D:4A7B (talk) 23:32, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Could WP:1RR be enforced here please? IanDBeacon (talk) 01:50, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ecp 2603:8080:D03:89D4:F840:EDB3:7AD8:B838 (talk) 22:53, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked: Ozone742 (talk · contribs) blocked by Bbb23. For a week. Daniel Case (talk) 03:18, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – On behalf of user Kurnahusa, who has been the target of long-term abuse by a particular person. I've suggested they can request an edit protection of their talk page, which they would like (User talk: Kurnahusa #Protecting your own talk page). soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 05:46, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 06:15, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2024_Lebanon_pager_explosions#cite_note-13

Remove ", including at least 12 civilians" in second sentence. The citation links to an ABC News article which says that "At least 12 civilians were killed and at least 2,800 people injured in the explosions that took place Tuesday, according to Lebanese authorities." However 12 is the total number of people that were reported killed from the Tuesday explosions, not the number of civilian casualties. 104.246.129.48 (talk) 05:37, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – This page isn't currently protected. You can propose this at Talk:2024 Lebanon pager explosions. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 19:09, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Greg Murphy is not a member of the Freedom Caucus. Source here (at the bottom of the article): https://www.cnn.com/2024/09/19/politics/north-carolina-governor-mark-robinson/index.html Alxcrn (talk) 18:58, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – This page isn't currently protected. You can propose this at Talk:Freedom Caucus. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 19:09, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of edit warring. The talk page suggests that some of the edits are based on WP:OR. Argenator (talk) 00:22, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It seems like the same users are edit warring in Alberta New Democratic Party over the same thing. Argenator (talk) 00:29, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Declined For now it seems they are trying to be part of the talk page discussion. Daniel Case (talk) 03:23, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – The article has been disrupted by various IPs for months. Ktrimi991 (talk) 12:47, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 92.53.12.0/23 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. from the article for three months. Daniel Case (talk) 03:38, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – IP range edit-warring over plot summary. DonIago (talk) 13:22, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. I have duly warned them, which hadn't been done. Daniel Case (talk) 03:52, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recently died. Hence lot of edits which is hard to verify. Aadirulez8 (talk) 17:19, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Seems like the death has now been sourced. Daniel Case (talk) 04:01, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Slow edit war by IPs adding unnecessary trivial information to the article. Level 4 warnings given to IPs on 17 and 20 September. Third IP reported to WP:AIV a few minutes ago. — Jkudlick ⚓ (talk) 21:21, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:12, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Semi-protection was applied as requested, only the template was incorrect. Favonian (talk) 08:03, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Ongoing whitewashing. Repeat Removal of sourced content. duffbeerforme (talk) 02:03, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. Or you could open discussion on the talk page. No one seems to have ever used it. Daniel Case (talk) 04:29, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Change the "mainly Hezbollah members" note on the casualties to "mainly civilians" as a large swath of Hezbollah casualties were apart of their political wing and considered civilians under international law, as well as ensuring the hundreds of medical staff who use pagers and were injured are not ignored. By simply stating that the majority of casualties were apart of Hezbollah, is suggests that the majority of casualties were non-civilian, which is inherently incorrect as stated above. It is imperative that this fact be clarified to prevent misinformation and further demonization of Lebanon.

Furthermore, it must be stated clearly and constantly that not only were the vast majority of the victims civilians, but that such an attack is, by definition and intent, a terror attack on Lebanon by israel (as israel has now confirmed they were behind it and had been planning it for an unspecified length of time). The severity of the attack in the context of international law must also be stated clearly as this is a clear violation of the Geneva Convention and general international law that protects civilians from attack and prohibits the use of terrorism a a legitimate manner of warfare.

For evidence to the above claims, see https://www.aljazeera.com/news/liveblog/2024/9/18/israels-war-on-gaza-live-thousands-injured-in-lebanon-pager-explosions in which multiple quotes from israel, Hezbollah, the Lebanese Health Ministry, the UN, and various other third-parties with weight on the issue can be found and used to validate the above claims. Against the Empire (talk) 05:04, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • "Mainly Hezbollah members" should be changed to "mainly civilians"
I am not aware of a single reliable source that has confirmed that most of the casualties were civilian. This is also something that I doubt will come to light very quickly, since Hezbollah generally does not like publishing lists of their soldiers, so discerning who is and isn't a soldier is extremely difficult. Hezbollah themselves claiming that "most casualties were civilian" is not evidence, as Hezbollah is not a reliable source on this matter, since they are known to regularly lie for propaganda purposes.
And suppose that we did have a reliable source claim that most casualties were civilian. This would still not change the fact that most reliable source primarily describe the casualties as "mainly Hezbollah members" and only talk about civilians second. The article must reflect the style of reliable formats, so it cannot assign more importance to their civilian status than their Hezbollah membership unless reliable sources also do so.
  • Medical staff should not be ignored
They are not ignored. Such information is mentioned under the "Casualties" section. Admittedly, this section could be expanded, and it probably will be with time.
  • Calling casualties mainly Hezbollah members suggests they are not civilians
No it doesn't. The interested reader is free to visit the Hezbollah article and read about their organization. It is not Wikipedia's job to correct every single possible misunderstanding that a reader might have at every possible moment.
  • This demonizes Lebanon
No it doesn't. There is no reason that the article's failure to clarify the exact makeup of the casualties should lead readers to conclude that Hezbollah is evil. And even if it does, this won't lead to the demonization of Lebanon, but that of Hezbollah.
And besides, it's not Wikipedia's job to prevent demonization. And even if it were, the change you suggest would lead to much more demonization of Israel than it would prevent demonization of Hezbollah, so the net change would be more demonization in the world.
  • It must be stated clearly and constantly...
No it shouldn't. That would be annoying to read.
  • Israel has now confirmed they were behind it
Where did you read this? It's news to me. You should really cite a source here, it would make a great addition to the article.
Dieknon (talk) 14:45, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Declined. The talk page is no longer protected. Please make a new request there, addressing the objections above when you do so. ~Anachronist (talk) 04:27, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(I did not put the talk page by mistake in the page title field, that was intentional)

Add topic about the sentence "It is not clear if only Hezbollah members were carrying the pagers" in the third paragraph of the article, with the next paragraph as the body of the topic:

The sentence "It is not clear if only Hezbollah members were carrying the pagers" appears to contradict other pieces of information in the article, specifically that two children died from the explosions. Hezbollah doesn't seem to have a history of using child soldiers in any capacity. The reported ages of the children who died seem to be around the range of 8-11, so I think it's safe to assume that the children who died were not members of Hezbollah. The size of the explosions wouldn't of been enough to kill someone without being in close proximity to it (its not like the pagers had a blast radius of several hundred meters), which implies that the children were either holding the pager or in close proximity to the pagers. Therefore, it can be assumed that non-Hezbollah members were carrying pagers. Granted, I doubt these children were carrying around a pager wherever they went, but they must've been relatively close to it in order to be killed by the pager (as in, holding or carrying the pager).

The reason why I'm saying to add a topic to the talk page instead of just "remove this sentence from the article" is because it's debatable if it actually does contradict, and I'd prefer to get some consensus about it beforehand. I can't request an edit of the article on the talk page due to it being protected, so I can't just use the edit request to gauge consensus on this issue. This could also very well be considered WP:OR, I'm of the opinion that "the explosive that requires one to be close to it to hurt them implies that people who were hurt by it were close to it" would fall under WP:CALC, but I could see consensus going either way on this. AlexChillOut (talk) 09:43, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Source? —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 15:14, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Here is a source used two sentences later in the same article for the claim about the children who died: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cd7xnelvpepo
Also, here is a source to show the range of the explosives, it can be seen in the video that they have a rather short range: https://www.cnn.com/world/live-news/lebanon-pagers-attack-hezbollah/index.html
That video is already uploaded to Wikipedia, and can be found here: https://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/File:CCTV_video_of_pager_explosion_in_a_Beirut_market.webm
The rest is mainly these two pieces of information put together, a pager killing a child implies the child was close enough to it to be injured; based on the range shown in the video, they were likely holding it. The source that is cited for the sentence I believe should be removed adds that it was not *immediately* clear, not that it's unclear now (https://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory/dozens-wounded-after-pagers-detonate-lebanon-officials-point-113754464) AlexChillOut (talk) 16:20, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Found another source, this one states that "[s]he picked up the device to bring it to her father and was holding it when it exploded, mangling her face and leaving the room covered in blood". Safe to assume she was not a Hezbollah member, as she was 9 years old. https://www.nytimes.com/2024/09/18/world/middleeast/lebanon-funeral-pager-attack.html AlexChillOut (talk) 02:06, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Declined. This isn't a rejection of your request, it's just that the talk page is no longer protected, so you can now make the request there. It really belongs there instead. ~Anachronist (talk) 04:25, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: BLP policy violations – This is one of those frustrating cases where people on the Internet have found information about something that is quite likely true, but has yet to be featured in any RS, and because one of the people involved is still alive, there's no wiggle room on the primary sources. Every few months, someone adds the same non-RS information, and sooner or later I or someone else removes it, but sometimes it stays up for hours or days. I think PCP would be a reasonable solution here, although I wouldn't be averse to semi either. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (they|xe) 06:50, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. @Tamzin: Some inline comments placed carefully in the article might not hurt. There's also a lack of user talk page warnings for sourcing and original research. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 07:12, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It's been a different person each time AFAICS, aside from one experienced user last year who ought to have known better and desisted after a second revert. I can try some hidden comments, but that doesn't change the fact that we're currently going days at a time accusing a living person of having been in a video many find racially insensitive. Low-visibility BLP violations are one of the main things PCP was enabled to deal with. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (they|xe) 07:17, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
A good portion of the editors making the change were autoconfirmed. Regardless, the current level of disruption is insufficient to justify either pending changes protection or semi-protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 07:44, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Current president of Sri Lanka. Presidential elections are currently ongoing. Temporary semi-protection requested due to persistent disruptive editing and vandalism from multiple IPs. QEnigma (talk) 10:47, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 10:53, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Section "History", paragraph 3:

In 1967 Marvin Minsky agreed, writing, "within a generation ... the problem of creating 'artificial intelligence' will substantially be solved".

Replace [ agreed, writing, "within ] with [ agreed, writing that "within ] to make the comma usage a bit cleaner.

Normally would have suggested minor changes like these at its talk page, but since the TP is also protected, well... 172.112.199.166 (talk) 04:44, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 DoneFavonian (talk) 08:41, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 11:10, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Per WP:CT/A-I. Pachu Kannan (talk) 07:14, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Favonian (talk) 11:04, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Practically every edit since mid 2020 to this obscure stub has been an IP or a sock of User:Darlapayne200313 blanking fragments of the article while claiming in the edit summary to be adding content to it. Prior to that the article had only had a small handful of edits since its creation in 2018. Belbury (talk) 09:26, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 10:56, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP changing editor that keeps adding theme song singer as a role. Has been reverted several times now and doesn't get the hint this is not necessary or correct. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 11:08, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 11:16, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to request that... (a correction needs to be made in the second paragraph of the article. It claims that the word negro is English in origin but it is actually Spanish in origin. The word nigger originated from the Spanish word "negro". English speakers' attempt to pronounce it correctly resulted in the present derogatory form.) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lag3141 (talkcontribs) 08:01, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done The origin of the word is explained in the "Etymology and history" section. Favonian (talk) 08:22, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. WiiUf ——The dragon travels through the stars 08:34, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 11:47, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. WiiUf ——The dragon travels through the stars 08:53, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 11:44, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Consistent amount of unreferenced edits from both registered editors and Ip users. Hotwiki (talk) 12:06, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 12:13, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent IP vandalism Kimen8 (talk) 12:41, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Less Unless (talk) 14:00, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Annh07 (talk) 12:51, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Less Unless (talk) 14:04, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs been changing years. Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 14:00, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Less Unless (talk) 14:22, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ClaudineChionh (she/her · talk · contribs · email) 14:04, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Less Unless (talk) 14:26, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and LTA; heavily vandalized with unsourced edits by a user named Exclamation3 Ex-Clamation within the last hour, these edits are similar to those made by recent Jeremiah Caquias sockpuppets. 2603:6081:893D:13AC:8832:E50D:A260:4C12 (talk) 05:15, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Someone please do something about this, the user is also vandalizing the semi-protected pages TeenNick and List of programs broadcast by TeenNick, I request ECP on these pages. 2603:6081:893D:13AC:8832:E50D:A260:4C12 (talk) 06:30, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked: Exclamation3 Ex-Clamation (talk · contribs) blocked by Dreamy Jazz. Globally locked for added good measure. Favonian (talk) 11:34, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated recent (last week or so) disruptive editing by new, likely COI accounts looking to remove sourced content that is "negative" towards the subject. Request re-establishment of semi-protection for at least six months to hopefully deal with the issue. Rambling Rambler (talk) 07:39, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – The matter is now being discussed at WP:ANI#Revolutionary Communist International, NOTHERE by likely COI accounts. Furthermore, your adversary is auto-confirmed, making semi-protection pointless. Favonian (talk) 11:28, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Can we reduce the level of edit protections on this subtemplate to match the parent of the template? I'm currently the primary editor/maintainer of this template, and don't have interest in becoming a template editor (beyond editing this family of templates). Mason (talk) 12:25, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protectedFavonian (talk) 14:30, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. WiiUf ——The dragon travels through the stars 09:04, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 103.135.144.0/24 (talk · contribs). Favonian (talk) 11:42, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hong Kong IP 24.28.96.155 (talk) 16:59, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 17:25, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Usual drive-by vandalism to the ib/lead by IPs for a newly released film. A mid-term semi should be fine. Gotitbro (talk) 13:09, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Less Unless (talk) 14:09, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP repeatedly disruptively removing content. Trailblazer101 (talk) 15:32, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 15:46, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP changing the tournament year from 2010 to 2011. Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 13:49, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Less Unless (talk) 14:19, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IPs. Charliehdb (talk) 14:28, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 17:32, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing. Sensitive article (see Arbitration request), semiprotection expired on 20 September 2024 and is still needed. Gitz (talk) (contribs) 17:13, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 17:34, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Repeated additions of unsourced controversial claims. Innisfree987 (talk) 17:27, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 17:39, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Change the image caption from 2007 to 2024, I believe that is vandalism 2601:282:4700:272:4984:153:4B8F:F879 (talk) 13:50, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That picture there is indeed from 2007, it is not vandalism. win8x (talking | spying) 13:52, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not done – Please see c:File:New City Hall, Springfield, Ohio.jpg. Favonian (talk) 14:24, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: One user with an IP Address is making unnecessary changes, please check the article history for more details. I have checked it thoroughly & tried to discuss it with the user, however, it is useless. VKG1985 (Talk | E-Mail | Contrib) 13:10, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 16:57, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism from IPs. —Yahya (talkcontribs.) 17:44, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Discospinster. Favonian (talk) 18:48, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent vandalism and/or disruptive editing ever since news broke of his departure from NCT (group) due to scandal. Was previously protected for the same reasons. Paper9oll (🔔📝) 18:22, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 18:39, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent edit by sock, most likely WP:LOUTSOCK. Since behavioral evidence clearly shows that the main contributors to this article are just the sockpuppet and his socks. There’s no way a new IP editor would know about this draft and choose to make their first edit here. Ckfasdf (talk) 13:45, 21 September 2024 (UTC) }}[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 21:07, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – article has a recent history of disruption, appears to be the case again, article belongs in WP:GS/CASTE. Sir Calculus (talk) 13:56, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Logged as enforcement for WP:GS/CASTE. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:07, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: These sock accounts—Jobayer Hossain Nejami, Md Mahdi Hasan MH, Farhad93, and the IP addresses 103.85.195.11, Arif2727, and 103.176.2.87—repeatedly engage in vandalism by removing well-referenced content.–𝐎𝐰𝐚𝐢𝐬 𝐀𝐥 𝐐𝐚𝐫𝐧𝐢 ʕʘ̅͜ʘ̅ʔ 14:34, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 21:10, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The Transformers film articles suffer a high level of disruptive edits from anonymous IP editors, and several are already locked. This is just the beginning

I would appreciate if you could start by setting the page to protection level to require flagged edits and wait before setting the protection level higher (but if all anon IP editors have to be locked out because of the few disruptive ones then so be it). 109.77.195.4 (talk) 15:51, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 17:03, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
How many more times does this wandering anon ipv6 editor have to vandalize the page before it can get protection? -- 109.77.195.4 (talk) 17:05, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent addition of unsourced and/or poorly materials including speculative materials. Paper9oll (🔔📝) 20:33, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I want indefinite semi-protection. Just look at the log. 2600:100C:B03C:EDA6:8E4:B5E6:D870:377C (talk) 20:36, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 21:02, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Being targeted by IP sockpuppets who like telling sex jokes. A rangeblock, semi-protection, or both are in order. I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 20:36, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator PhilKnight. For three days. Daniel Case (talk) 20:56, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Ratnahastin (talk) 16:46, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of the remaining time, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. If the disrupting user manages to overcome this before then through gaming permissions, let us know. Daniel Case (talk) 21:18, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent nuisance edits to the pronouns of the subject in violation of MOS:GENDERID. Jessamyn (my talk page) 19:00, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 21:29, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism immediately following protection lapse. Nswix (talk) 19:48, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 21:37, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: it is a article about the dangers and effects of the misuse for dxm, people need to be aware and we dont need anyone editing it and putting in lies or just other unacceptable things. TheJodeciadams (talk) 18:50, 21 September 2024 (UTC)TheJodeciAdams[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Airplaneman (talk) 18:56, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High level of IP vandalism. Susbush (talk) 19:05, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Favonian (talk) 19:30, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalism from a variety of different IPs. signed, Willondon (talk) 21:59, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bbb23 (talk) 22:42, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

22 September 2024

Reason: Voting has concluded and currently the counting is in process. A number of edits without official data have been reverted. These contain speculative or unofficial information sourced from media outlets. Persistent edit-warring and disruptive editing is happening. Currently the article is in a semi-protected state. Increasing the level to Extended confirmed protection could significantly reduce disruptions and edit wars until the official results are declared and the winning candidate is sworn into office. QEnigma (talk) 14:59, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 21:04, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Sensitive topic, very much in the news, has had a spate of incorrect / un-cited information being added and runs the risk of violating WP:NOTSCANDAL and/or WP:NOTNEWS. Smallangryplanet (talk) 17:06, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Looks like editors are handling it. Daniel Case (talk) 21:21, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced WP:OR - FlightTime Phone (open channel) 19:28, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 188.26.210.34 (talk · contribs) blocked by PhilKnight. for a week. Daniel Case (talk) 21:03, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Latest target of the extremely banned WP:LTA/GRP. JavaHurricane 21:48, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Elli (talk | contribs) 06:08, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – This page's history is mostly vandalism and its removal. Karol739 (talk) 21:54, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 22:39, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing by IPs. Johnj1995 (talk) 03:22, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 05:51, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from IP editors. FifthFive (talk) 21:57, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Sdrqaz. Favonian (talk) 08:45, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Change protection level from pending to indef semi because pending is not working. 2603:8080:D03:89D4:DBC:A9DB:D80B:D9D6 (talk) 02:54, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. It's had one reverted edit in two weeks. That is a great result. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 05:53, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP disruptive updates RogerYg (talk) 03:44, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 05:32, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent unconstructive, POV and disruptive edits by IP users. Chanaka L (talk) 22:00, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism from IP editors and new accounts. IDB.S (talk) 00:28, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 09:06, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from IP editors and new accounts. IDB.S (talk) 01:45, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 09:09, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – All edits so far this year have been socks inserting same spam. Requesting semi for long (6 months?) temporary period, and maybe they will lose interest. Nick Levine (talk) 08:25, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @Nick Levine: If disruption resumes, please submit a new request and we'll consider a longer duration. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 09:23, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Protect from removing Mandarin and Tamil as Malaysian languages by Gandalfett, due to Malaysia is a multiracial and multicultural country and it tolerant and promote different cultures within the country. 119.56.96.46 (talk) 00:55, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 09:25, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing by anonymous users. Captain Cornwall (talk) 10:50, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. GoodnightmushTalk 13:50, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Whoops. GoodnightmushTalk 16:41, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. GoodnightmushTalk 16:41, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 18:55, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please remove the trailing </span> tag after the "my talk page" link. It does not have a matching opening <span> tag, which causes Linter errors on the 30 pages that transclude it. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:46, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 DoneFavonian (talk) 18:00, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 18:56, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Repeated IP block evasions and repeated reverting. Trailblazer101 (talk) 17:31, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 20:08, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent disruptive editing by sockpuppet accounts. Bgsu98 (Talk) 19:00, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: The company now likely meet WP:GNG due to new developments since 2015. A number of reliable sources now cover the studio: [100][101][102][103][104][105][106][107]. A redirect to Koch Media or Embracer Group, or the creation of a new article is now likely. I am requesting this again because the closing admin last time declined the request as he confused this company with Draft:Vertigo Gaming, which is not the same company. OceanHok (talk) 05:51, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined for now. Given the lengthy deletion history on this, I'd like to see a draft first. Your first source has no byline and looks like a press release. The second one has a byline but reads like it was taken from a press release. The third one (Reuters) is OK but not really about the company, more about an acquisition, and wouldn't be significant coverage. The other sources look fine. ~Anachronist (talk) 16:57, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 22:48, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 20:14, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing barrage from many IPs "requests" from the LTA who has been harassing Magnolia677. Zinnober9 (talk) 20:03, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Please protect for a day. Multiple Block Evasion by MAB IPs. Untamed1910 (talk) 20:13, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bishonen | tålk 21:53, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated addition of content promoting a YouTube channel AndyTheGrump (talk) 20:25, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And done by multiple IPs. The Banner talk 20:47, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bishonen | tålk 21:49, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

23 September 2024

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. The Banner talk 13:09, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Bishonen. Elli (talk | contribs) 23:08, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:PIA. ~~2NumForIce (speak|edits) 15:02, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Elli (talk | contribs) 23:10, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:PIA. ~~2NumForIce (speak|edits) 15:34, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Elli (talk | contribs) 23:10, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:PIA. ~~2NumForIce (speak|edits) 15:38, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Elli (talk | contribs) 23:10, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:PIA. ~~2NumForIce (speak|edits) 15:44, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Elli (talk | contribs) 23:11, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:PIA. ~~2NumForIce (speak|edits) 15:48, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Elli (talk | contribs) 23:11, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High level of IP vandalism. Susbush (talk) 18:35, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ymblanter (talk) 20:04, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Prevention of edit war. Cundebuff (talk) 19:36, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, if you get reverted by multiple users you should go to the talk page and discuss. Ymblanter (talk) 20:02, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Declined. (edit conflict) You're edit warring against several users and therefore you would like the article protected? Yeah, no. Bishonen | tålk 20:06, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – This article seems to be a recurring problem and there is good evidence of sock-puppetry being used to revert edits. Aszx5000 (talk) 11:26, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Elli (talk | contribs) 23:20, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Ban evasion by User:Brettandelle. Binksternet (talk) 15:31, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Elli (talk | contribs) 23:18, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: It's Sunday, it's a referee, what else can I say. Unknown Temptation (talk) 16:10, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Elli (talk | contribs) 23:17, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Frost 09:17, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined: ECing a talkpage is generally a last resort; will wait for them to request it. Elli (talk | contribs) 23:14, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Under attack by LTA. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 00:43, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Star Mississippi. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 01:25, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 01:16, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Persistant Sockpuppetry/Block evasion of User:Mastkodont Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 01:18, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I'm a bit loathe to indef semi a talk page. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 01:22, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Upgrade to extended-confirmed indefinitely: Related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, and to the recent 2024 Lebanon pager explosions. ѕιη¢єяєℓу ƒяσм, ᗰOᗪ ᑕᖇEᗩTOᖇ 🏡 🗨 📝 22:57, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined: no recent disruption, and not really that closely related to the conflict. Elli (talk | contribs) 23:23, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 23:07, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:54, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Multiple IP users repeatedly make changes and insert brand names and related content for those brands. Contrary to WP:MEDMOS. Also WP:COI, WP:NPOV. Whywhenwhohow (talk) 23:24, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:58, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated addition of logo that is nearly identical to current logo by several IPs, including two blocked as LTAs, without consensus. Johnny Au (talk/contributions) 00:17, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 03:02, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Non-EC users participating in EC-only discussions. Would suggest one month as that probably will be enough time for this to get out of the spotlight, can always be extended later. Awesome Aasim 02:53, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 03:08, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Recent IP-disruption:[108][109]. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 15:22, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. And logged at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 03:20, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:PIA. ~~2NumForIce (speak|edits) 15:28, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 03:27, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Protection requested atleast until December 2024 to avoid unsourced additions by both IPs and new users. Eviction status keeps on getting updated based on speculations without any sources despite advicing not to do so. Even before premiere the speculations are being updates. The article was semi-protected twice in the span of 21 days. Thewikizoomer (talk) 15:33, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also edit warring on the eviction issue by IPs too is observed. Thewikizoomer (talk) 15:34, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 03:31, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Long-term sockpuppetry by autoconfirmed accounts and IPs of WP:GENSEX POV-pusher Raxythecat since July 2023.

Here is a list of socks:

  • How I could just edit a wiki article (edited from July to August 2023; confirmed sock, same pattern of using "fixing"/"fixed" on edit summaries while removing content and editing on mobile devices)
  • 2804:431:F73C:AD80:3591:2D22:DADB:C459 (August 2023; started editing the article shortly after the account above was blocked for socking, same pattern of editing on mobile devices, same interest in mythology/occult religions articles as other socks of raxy)
  • 2600:6C4A:717F:B637:348B:313C:B838:E42E (Jan 2024; same pattern of using "fixing"/"fixed" on edit summaries while removing content and editing on mobile)
  • 107.77.209.82 (Jan 2024; same pattern of using "fixing"/"fixed" on edit summaries and editing on mobile, same range as multiple IPs listed at this spi section)
  • Big Money Threepwood (Feb 2024; confirmed sock, same pattern of removing content from the article)

Raxy has a high degree of interest in this particular area of GENSEX and has been using autoconfirmed accounts to POV-push in this area for a long time, as seen at A person from nowhere, How I could just edit a wiki article and Underwoods Witch. He is an experienced sockpuppeteer and, judging by his reappearances in this article for the span of at least 8 months, he seems to have this page on his "watchlist", so I'm asking for an indefinite extended-protection. Badbluebus (talk) 17:24, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 03:37, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – only edits made this year to this page has been ip vandals. Akaibu (talk) 01:24, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 01:26, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Loafiewa (talk) 21:46, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 05:37, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Untamed1910 (talk) 03:01, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator DMacks. Favonian (talk) 05:17, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. – DreamRimmer (talk) 03:58, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Novem Linguae. Favonian (talk) 05:17, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Protection for the article talk page may be necessary since IPs have stated derogatory terms about editors who have reverted them.

Reason: Repeated block evasion by Kelownatopdog. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kelownatopdog. Thank you for your time. --A.S. Brown (talk) 00:23, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 05:57, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated block evasion by Kelownatopdog. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kelownatopdog. Thank you for your time. --A.S. Brown (talk) 00:23, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 06:02, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:RUSUKR due to his past work as recruiter. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 00:20, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Vandalism edits by Anonymous IP Address. Gunther :  Talk  00:27, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 03:05, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Still, the election is going on and some people are trying to change the president. PLEASE PROTECT THIS. IDB.S (talk) 13:21, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2407:C00:D001:BD84:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. from the article for one week. Daniel Case (talk) 03:11, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent unreferenced edits from IP users and newly created accounts. Hotwiki (talk) 01:08, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 07:21, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent misrepresentation of sources. Nardog (talk) 02:54, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 07:20, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent edit warring by an SPA/COI/RGW/POV user. Axad12 (talk) 05:26, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 07:24, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated edit warring by COI user (as per Wingtech above) Axad12 (talk) 05:27, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 07:26, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Mattplaysthedrums (talk) 06:47, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 07:27, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Mattplaysthedrums (talk) 06:49, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 07:02, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:PIA. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 01:03, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Logged as enforcement for WP:CT/A-I. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 07:36, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Arab-Israeli conflict. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 01:05, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Logged as enforcement for WP:CT/A-I. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 07:39, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Arab-Israeli Conflict. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 01:08, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Logged as enforcement for WP:CT/A-I. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 07:43, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Javext (talk) 22:19, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. I have also put a CTOPS notice (HORN) on the talk page Daniel Case (talk) 05:40, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP addresses continue to add unsourced content. CNMall41 (talk) 23:39, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 05:42, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Arab-Israeli conflict. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 00:51, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Edits are rare, no disruption for months. Lectonar (talk) 07:00, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. -Lemonaka 00:59, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Ymblanter (talk) 07:17, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Mattplaysthedrums (talk) 06:52, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Ymblanter (talk) 07:07, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Mattplaysthedrums (talk) 06:59, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Ymblanter (talk) 07:07, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Arab-Israeli conflict. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 00:53, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 07:29, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Arab-Israeli conflict. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 00:54, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 07:29, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Arab-Israeli conflict. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 00:55, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 07:30, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Arab-Israeli conflict. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 00:56, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 07:30, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Israel-Palestine conflict. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 00:56, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 07:30, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Arab-Israeli conflict. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 00:57, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 07:30, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Arab-Israeli conflict. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 00:58, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 07:31, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Arab-Israeli conflict. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 01:00, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 07:31, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Arab-Israeli conflict. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 01:01, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 07:31, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Arab-Israeli conflict. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 01:02, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 07:32, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Palestine-Israel Articles. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 01:03, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 07:32, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Mattplaysthedrums (talk) 06:51, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 07:28, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Mattplaysthedrums (talk) 06:51, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ymblanter (talk) 07:22, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Arab-Israeli conflict. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 01:04, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 07:37, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Arab-Israeli conflict. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 01:06, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 07:39, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Arab-Israeli conflict. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 01:08, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 07:40, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Moxy🍁 04:11, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Starting with semi and we'll see how it goes. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 15:32, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block evasion edit warring by User:Bigboss19923. Belbury (talk) 09:39, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 15:36, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: 3 different IPs since yesterday trying to change a page about a Hungarian surname into a page about a Jat tribe, despite the page not listing anyone from that tribe. Fram (talk) 10:35, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator zzuuzz. Favonian (talk) 13:45, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs are back with disruptive edits after the previous protection expired earlier today. Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 12:52, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. v/r - TP 15:52, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The last 10 edits are only the removal of content from the infobox, and then that being reverted by other editors. The only vandalism is removal of one topic from the infobox by different IP editors (probably just one person with dynamic IP, but no proof for it). Bunnypranav (talk) 13:48, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. v/r - TP 16:07, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The last 10 edits are only the removal of content from the infobox, and then that being reverted by other editors. The only vandalism is removal of one topic from the infobox by different IP editors (probably just one person with dynamic IP, but no proof for it). The same IP edits New Left (Poland) as well. Bunnypranav (talk) 13:51, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. v/r - TP 16:09, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IP editors continuing to add unsourced shows to the article. Ravensfire (talk) 14:10, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. v/r - TP 16:13, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Frequent COI edits. LakesideMinersCome Talk To Me! 14:14, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Primefac. v/r - TP 16:15, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism over the years. Metta79 (talk) 14:23, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. v/r - TP 16:16, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: CTOPS ARBPIA. Borgenland (talk) 14:35, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined There isn't significant vandalism there, or edits even. There is plenty of attention on this article to handle the minor vandalism there. It will likely be protected in the future, but we don't do preemptive protection.v/r - TP 16:12, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 16:17, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This page is being repeatedly created by paid editors from upwork without following policies. Recent paid user moved draft to main after draft was declined by reviewers. Thanks In2020 (talk) 14:34, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 16:42, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP editor continually adding unintelligible text. Mellk (talk) 16:05, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @Mellk: Please try to make greater efforts to explain your reversions in edit summaries. Leaving some explanations that go into details rather than using broad disruptive editing templates may also help. Thanks. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 16:56, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Three-month semi-protection: persistent IP meat/sockpuppetry to add unsourced material. Implications of such a protection discussed at User talk:ZLEA. ~ Pbritti (talk) 16:28, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 16:48, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Regular source removal and content changes by IPs… propose temporary protection, but wonder if a longer term protection might be necessary given the vandalism has spanned multiple months. Danners430 (talk) 15:26, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. If it continues happening infrequently, we can try pending changes. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 15:43, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Firefangledfeathers in that case please can you enable pending changes? There have been four virtually identical edits by different IP's since August 19. This childish behaviour looks like a pattern that will continue? 10mmsocket (talk) 16:59, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
We can try PC for a month. I'm not sure it'll be effective, since the changes may not be seen as obvious vandalism, but I did include a brief explanation in the protection summary, which PC reviewers see when reviewing. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 17:12, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 17:12, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 17:17, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. v/r - TP 18:08, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – The press has made some juicy content about this article and the subject. Disruption has surged today. TheWikiToby (talk) 18:00, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. v/r - TP 18:07, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: this is a Old Archived talk page. †TyphoonAmpil† (💬 - 📝 - 🌀 - Tools) 09:38, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 15:33, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: this is a Old Archived talk page. †TyphoonAmpil† (💬 - 📝 - 🌀 - Tools) 09:39, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. TyphoonAmpil, we don't protect pages preemptively. Please request again if your archives are disrupted. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 15:34, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Per WP:GSCASTE, disruptive editing and vandalism by socks and IPs. Ratnahastin (talk) 10:41, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. The last 10 edits encompass 12 months. There isn't enough disruption to warrant protection at this point.v/r - TP 15:32, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 13:12, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 209.7.245.210 (talk · contribs) blocked by JBW. v/r - TP 15:39, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Inactive Admin: The protection is no longer necessary as other related articles, such as Miss Universe Philippines and Binibining Pilipinas, functions perfectly well and provides up to date information and details without protection. Passionate fans and individuals cannot update, modify, and input necessary details without discussing it first on the Talk Page that is usually ignored by the protecting admin. FilipinoTiger (talk) 14:34, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. The protecting admin ToBeFree is not inactive but is not obligated to answer edit requests, which can be answered by anyone. Use Wikipedia:Edit Request Wizard to make proper requests. A passionate editor is not a neutral editor, and such editors should be proposing changes on the talk page. ~Anachronist (talk) 15:33, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: WP:ARBPIA protection needed. Two reversions have already occurred and the only topics currently on the page relate to PIA. Standard EC protection is being requested, given reversions have occurred now. The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 11:00, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: Tolli_Rabano (talk · contribs) blocked by TParis. v/r - TP 15:37, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'll protect this if it recurs again. @TParis: I don't think the block of Tolli was correct (at least not for vandalism) - while the change to the P:CE page was uncited, and the large increases in the numbers were what drew my attention, there's sources for them in the main article at 23 September 2024 Lebanon strikes. Not that this user should be the one adding them, of course. —Cryptic 15:43, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Cryptic: The block wasn't just based on that article alone. This user exclusively edits numbers in current events pages suggesting that they're probably an experienced sock. But, also, that aside from this article, in other P:CE, they've taken more exact numbers and swapped them to higher ambiguous numbers without sources - all related to Lebanon. Clearly a SPA.--v/r - TP 15:50, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP-vandalism Lklundin (talk) 11:56, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2405:3800:912:6BA2:0:0:0:1 (talk · contribs) blocked by Zzuuzz. v/r - TP 15:44, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 13:12, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. In the last 2 weeks, there was one instance of vandalism and once instance of a user unsure whether a period (.) came before or after a double quotation mark. v/r - TP 15:41, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism. Susbush (talk) 15:42, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 15:48, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I have tried to add as much information as I could gather but some people with ill motives are trying to include misinformation which may be misleading and harmful for an organisation. So I think you will consider this request to for page protection. Thanks. Itz.mas10 (talk) 15:53, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. v/r - TP 15:54, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism. Susbush (talk) 15:23, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 16:00, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Moxy🍁 15:24, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 16:04, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 15:37, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 15:57, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked: 64.88.19.47 (talk · contribs) blocked by Jauerback. I'm on the edge here. While all activity recently has been vandalism, it stretches over 4 months and very few edits. The most recent stuff, within the last 2 weeks there has only been 4 vandalism edits from an IP that is already blocked and a user that is already blocked. Not even vandalism to warrant protection, in my opinion.v/r - TP 15:59, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – ip's adding unsourced information and adding in every pbs show known to man into a quote from one of the voice actors. Magical Golden Whip (talk) 15:10, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 16:16, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive editing by IPs. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 16:35, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. @Mvcg66b3r: Also, this does not look like vandalism. Please don't bite the newcomers. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 16:44, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – After previous bout of page protection expired yesterday, editors kept removing and restoring a second paragraph in the lede, despite ongoing discussion and a lack of consensus on the talk page. This is about an ongoing current event, and I expect it will be contentious for the foreseeable future. Thank you. Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 18:51, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This page needs an editor familiar with events in the region to help sort through the edit warring. In the meantime, I've put protected the article for 2 weeks. v/r - TP 19:14, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruption of numeric values continues per this. Kailash29792 (talk) 18:06, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined This happened once 2 weeks ago. Not even remotely appropriate for page protection. Please do not report these kind of situations again, they clog up the requests page.--v/r - TP 18:12, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IPs still continue to add the same unsourced content despite warnings and reverts. Becoming highly disruptive. CNMall41 (talk) 19:25, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Virtually the only activity on this page for the last two months has been two ipv6 ranges adding similar non-notable entries to this list: 2405:201:c017:181a/64 and 2405:201:c028:11c9/64. These are probably socks of the blocked Pavancse67779.

SInce the two pages being attacked (List of jurists and Jurist) get so little legitimate editing activity, I thought temporary page protection would be less disruptive than blocking two ipv6 ranges, though I'll obviously defer to your judgement on that. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 20:58, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Let's see how this works. A /42 range is big enough to block both sock ranges, but has too much collateral damage. And this would be no barrier to legitimate IP edits. Daniel Case (talk) 22:18, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Virtually the only activity on this page for the last two months has been two ipv6 ranges adding similar non-notable entries to this list: 2405:201:c017:181a/64 and 2405:201:c028:11c9/64. These are probably socks of the blocked Pavancse67779.

SInce the two pages being attacked (List of jurists and Jurist) get so little legitimate editing activity, I thought temporary page protection would be less disruptive than blocking two ipv6 ranges, though I'll obviously defer to your judgement on that. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 20:58, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Let's see how this works. A /42 range is big enough to block both sock ranges, but has too much collateral damage. And this would be no barrier to legitimate IP edits. Daniel Case (talk) 22:21, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

24 September 2024

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Edits from different IPs reverting the same edit, previous sockpuppery. Nigel757 (talk) 22:03, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 22:39, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent IP sockpuppetry from LTA. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TyMega. HorrorLover555 (talk) 22:07, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 22:49, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent IP sockpuppetry from LTA. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TyMega. HorrorLover555 (talk) 22:14, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. It's more than just the socks. Daniel Case (talk) 23:00, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Will also log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 23:00, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Edit-warring to re-insert problematic BLP material. User:Lovefromjuliaxo picked up the disruption following London IP ranges Special:Contributions/2A0A:EF40:729:8601:0:0:0:0/64 and Special:Contributions/2A0A:EF40:6AB:1D01:0:0:0:0/64, Special:Contributions/2A0A:EF40:6AA:9E01:0:0:0:0/64, Special:Contributions/2A0A:EF40:6C5:401:0:0:0:0/64, and Special:Contributions/2A0A:EF40:600:1E01:0:0:0:0/64, and also Scottish IP Special:Contributions/89.243.181.241. Binksternet (talk) 22:35, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will also leave CTOPS notice on talk. Daniel Case (talk) 23:11, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Leonidlednev (T, C, L) 22:38, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Repeated additions and a page move of an unconfirmed title from unreliable sources. Trailblazer101 (talk) 19:56, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Almost no activity, and it seems title has been confirmed. Daniel Case (talk) 22:07, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – We're getting a little unwanted attention about an utterly irrelevant subject on this page, and it seems to be creating work for the Oversighters. Could we get a semi on this noticeboard for a few days?. WhatamIdoing (talk) 00:08, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bbb23 (talk) 00:20, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: SlimVirgin semi-protected the page in June 2019 during a particularly contentious period. Now that Watten has been restored to his teaching position I am requesting removal. I moved a discussion with a new user to the page before realizing it was still protected. See Talk:Barrett Watten#Barrett Watten. The article itself is no longer protected. Thank you. StarryGrandma (talk) 23:12, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected Daniel Case (talk) 23:16, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – IP socks of SamBeckom09 continuing aggressive revert pattern following the account's block. Jalen Barks (Woof) 22:01, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2603:300F:C00:2E00:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for two weeks. Daniel Case (talk) 22:27, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued disruptive editing by an IP who insists the station's newscasts are "low-budget". Mvcg66b3r (talk) 00:54, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done I've given it a week. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 03:40, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive edits from IPs. MrOllie (talk) 01:16, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done I've given it a month. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 03:42, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. High level of IP vandalism Susbush (talk) 01:24, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done - I've given it a month initially as it does have some months with no vandalism (and is a high traffic article with watchers)...but yes, indefinite could be considered sooner rather than later Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 03:48, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism of the Judaism section and erroneous mass deletion of content in the Judaism section. Bandlero (talk) 01:44, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done I've given it a month - page history is a bit messy and would benefit from some protection for a bit. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 03:50, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IPs adding unsourced rumoured contents. Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 04:45, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 08:15, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs making empty edit requests & more. Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 05:11, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 08:14, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long term IP disruption. Mellk (talk) 05:38, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 08:12, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – The edit-warring concerning the box office gross has started up again. Skywatcher68 (talk) 03:34, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 08:20, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Vandalism altering school to include information about facility in Nigeria Mattplaysthedrums (talk) 05:27, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 08:13, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Deceased user, please protect the local user page per policy. Regards, Aafi (talk) 08:10, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected indefinitely. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 08:21, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes protection: Persistent Vandalism. Vandalism from multiple IPs/Accounts Mattplaysthedrums (talk) 04:19, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 08:19, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP WP:CRV edits. Brat Forelli🦊 09:06, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 12:10, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing. As previous attempts at warning and blocking the disruptive user seemed futile, and this is the only affected page, the least we can do is have the pending changes protection to protect against the user's constant disruptive editing, while still allowing for constructive edits. Chyx1095 (talk) 09:17, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Still, we don't protect a page when there's essentially one user disrupting. The user has been given much rope over the last days, and we can easily escalate the blocks. I would use individual messages to adress them, though, not templates. On the positive side, they seem to be slowly learning. Perhaps they will adapt, slowly. Lectonar (talk) 10:49, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Ip vandalism adding context not mentioned or implied in the source. Change reverted by other editors and administrator but the ip keeps adding it back with wrong description. RangersRus (talk) 11:15, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. The /64 p-blocked indefinitely. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 12:18, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing from multiple IPs. There is no reason to capitalize all words. Annh07 (talk) 12:30, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. The /64 blocked for a week. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 12:40, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – People are continuously coming and removing important content related to deities worshipped at this Monastery. I request that you please add protection to this page. MRRaja001 (talk) 12:32, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Last disruption more than 3 weeks ago. Lectonar (talk) 12:45, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive IP-hopping editor. Mellk (talk) 15:35, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already done by administrator Writ Keeper. Writ Keeper  15:38, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Wide consensus is good. ND61F (talk) 06:11, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@ND61F, users with less than 500 edits and 30 days of experience can't engage in that topic area unless they're simply making edit requests. "Wide consensus" on that page move discussion isn't possible, at least not in the way you seem to be thinking. Nythar (💬-🍀) 06:20, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I acknowledge the existing guidelines regarding user participation in specific topic areas based on edit count and experience. While I respect these restrictions, I believe that fostering a more inclusive environment could benefit our community. ND61F (talk) 06:25, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
And I respect your opinion, although I have to say that there's no point requesting this because the page's protection level isn't going to be decreased to allow for participation in that discussion by non-extended confirmed editors; the guidelines are quite strict with regards to contentious topic areas. Nythar (💬-🍀) 06:35, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@ND61F: ArbCom wouldn't have imposed the 500/30 restriction unless every lesser method to try and kerb the disruption was failing or had already failed. And the fact that a fifth ARBPIA case was recently spitballed by ArbCom should tell you that the 500/30 restrictions are themselves failing to kerb the disruption in this very emotionally-charged ethno-political topic area. That is not an argument to ignore the restrictions. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 06:48, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Declined per the above Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 12:08, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

25 September 2024

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Pending changes doesn't seem to be working. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 16:44, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator Goodnightmush has semi-protected it for two weeks and also indefinitely move-protected it. As an admin and as someone who wrote a good part of the article, I concur.--Wehwalt (talk) 18:44, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Goodnightmush. For the bot. Favonian (talk) 19:15, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Someone input "Linkin Park" to the team list. (Note: They made the OST for 2024 League of Legends World Championship) VernardoLau (talk) 17:46, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. GoodnightmushTalk 18:19, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – chronic and persistent vandalism over the past few days. ser! (chat to me - see my edits) 22:14, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done by Hey man im josh Charlotte (Queen of Heartstalk) 23:35, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – persistent disruptive editing; IP sock avoiding talk page discussion. Ekdalian (talk) 11:38, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done I've given it three months. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 23:16, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: More POV vandalism after previous protection expired. Orchastrattor (talk) 13:52, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done I've given it three months.Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 23:18, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. — DaxServer (t·m·e·c) 13:54, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done I've given it three months. Appears to be a long term problem. If recurs might be worth indef semiprotection Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 23:20, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent non-constructive and speculative edits. Hunterb212 (talk) 14:17, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done edits are by named users not IPs so not warranted here. Can revisit later though. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 23:21, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent spate of POV vandalism - it appears to be a case of there being a discussion on the website in question about the Wikipedia article, and users are taking matters into their own hands. Will hopefully pass in a few days. AntiDionysius (talk) 14:17, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done I've given it 3 weeks Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 23:26, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Disruptive editing in "Set list" section. HorrorLover555 (talk) 14:34, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done given it 10 days Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 23:28, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – numerous disruptive IP edits. TheWarOfArt (talk) 17:07, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I'm only seeing one vandal edit in the past month, so I don't think a temp semi is warranted at this time. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 00:39, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – See four most recent edits: [110] [111] [112] [113]. Cambial foliar❧ 22:42, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 00:37, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Severe vandalism & disruptive editing. 🛧Midori No Sora♪🛪 ( ☁=☁=✈) 01:26, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected – 1 month. EdJohnston (talk) 01:33, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please create as a redirect to Josh O'Brien. Thanks. * Pppery * it has begun... 00:22, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 01:48, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 05:20, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:CT/AI. Skitash (talk) 16:30, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Cas Liber. Indefinite ECP. Daniel Case (talk) 04:34, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcementWP:CT/AI. Skitash (talk) 18:12, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 04:39, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Contentious topic, all other timeline articles being extended confirmed </MarkiPoli> <talk /><cont /> 18:15, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ad Orientem. indef ECP. Daniel Case (talk) 04:43, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Persistent disruptive editing by multiple IPs. PadFoot (talk) 18:35, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will leave CTOPS notice on talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 05:31, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Continuous additions of the same unsourced content by IPs despite reverts and warnings. CNMall41 (talk) 19:13, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 05:34, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism returned after last protection expired (and likely will continue), so request indef this time. Raladic (talk) 20:47, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. We can revisit this after the election, depending on the outcome. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 05:42, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from IP addresses since 16:16, 20 September 2024‎. Alith Anar 23:24, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 05:47, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Many different IPs are edit warring, POV-pushing pseudohistory. tgeorgescu (talk) 23:49, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 05:53, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 01:52, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 05:59, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Content Dispute/Edit Warring. Edit warring/Vandalism concerning the name of school from a new account as well as IP Mattplaysthedrums (talk) 01:55, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 06:01, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 02:20, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 06:03, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Execution of a man that many believe was innocent is resulting in multiple people edit the title with "Murderer" and the like Acebulf (talk | contribs) 05:10, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 06:05, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IP user has inserted unsupported info 5 times over last few days. Coeusin (talk) 05:14, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 06:07, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Falls under the Arab-Israeli war contentious topic, has seen a bunch of random information be added/removed in the past few days (especially since jordan recently held elections). Alongside this the party is affiliated with the Muslim Brotherhood, which is itself locked to extended confirmed. 🤓 WeaponizingArchitecture | scream at me 🤓 17:34, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I don't see a close enough nexus with PIA at the moment to justify indef ECP under that. Daniel Case (talk) 04:36, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple IPs originating from Brazil have made the same vandalizing edits (overly long genres, poor captions) that have been consistently reverted over a long time frame. [114][115][116][117]. Cerebral726 (talk) 17:55, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Doesn't look like there's been much of that in the last couple of weeks. Daniel Case (talk) 04:37, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Aintabli (talk) 05:31, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 06:10, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. 🔥Jalapeño🔥 contribs 19:47, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 05:35, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Multiple users repeatedly attempted to censor specific content, ignoring discussions and warnings. https://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/User_talk:117.20.69.134 https://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Special:Contributions/151.19.131.230 https://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=Assassin%27s_Creed_Shadows&action=history Xslyq (talk) 23:33, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 05:48, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Constant vandalism. Horep (talk) 00:23, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Our MoS should require a certain amount of experience before editing. Moxy🍁 01:47, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. This, really, is a policy-level thing that should be discussed at WT:MOS rather than here. Daniel Case (talk) 05:57, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandals back to re-order/change cast listing after previous protection ended. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 06:41, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 12:47, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing from multiple IPs. Annh07 (talk) 07:07, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 13:01, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: bored IP without TV or Netflix, I guess, having some fun vandalizing Wikipedia. Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 10:08, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 14:17, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism due to their recently announced shows in India. GustavoCza (talkcontribs) 10:23, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 14:26, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Requesting page protection due to potential vandalism following the execution of Marcellus Williams. Kloripanda (talk) 06:36, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection Kloripanda (talk) 06:38, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 12:46, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent removal of content by IPs from the same location. Soapwort (talk) 07:52, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 13:23, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Disruptive editing from multiple new users (possibly the same under new accounts), restoring a fully unsourced, promotional article. Rhain (he/him) 09:47, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Confirmed sockpuppetry. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 13:51, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – concerning amounts of edit filter hits. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 13:45, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. If the filters are doing their job, let them keep doing their job. Writ Keeper  13:47, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: repeated attempts by self-publisher using various IP addresses to get their book added to bibliography. One week protection from ip editing, please.𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 15:40, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 16:48, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Removal of sourced content by an IP. Sid95Q (talk) 08:41, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 14:22, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: WP:ARBPIA Isi96 (talk) 09:30, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. by me, in fact, two years ago. Favonian (talk) 16:59, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Seyamar(245CMR)💬📜 10:29, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 14:31, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: A user is removing redirect and adding only primary sources (again and again) after the page got unprotected. M S Hassan 📬✍🏻 11:43, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Let AfD sort this out. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 14:43, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Repeated targetting by the Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Magichero1234 sock network which goes back years. Asking for a semi-indef on a topic covered by IPA sactions. Gotitbro (talk) 12:14, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 15:03, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Susbush (talk) 12:24, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 15:04, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by User:ICT Fan. Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 13:48, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 15:07, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Easier to protect the page than to block every IP responsible for changing Daddy Yankee to someone else. Skywatcher68 (talk) 13:50, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 15:08, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 14:23, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Bbb23 (talk) 15:08, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I would also be ok with pending changes as well, since the vandalism seems to be a little slow. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 14:40, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 15:09, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism Swinub 11:59, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sdrqaz (talk) 19:18, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 13:44, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – simply wow. Moxy🍁 16:58, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 19:21, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Just about every edit is vandalism or vandalism reversion. Kingsmasher678 (talk) 17:38, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Sdrqaz. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 19:16, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Three instances since 15 September; last incident before that was in July. Vandalism is too spaced-apart for semi-protection. Sdrqaz (talk) 19:18, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism from half a dozen IPs within the past month, including three within the past week, for an obviously contentious topic in an area under active arbitration remedies. There are six weeks left until the election, and it is reasonable to expect increasing vandalism from all ends of the political spectrum until that event, and that vandals will lose interest in this page thereafter, no matter the outcome. I propose s-protection for that six week span. BD2412 T 12:16, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 20:23, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – This page is being disrupted by multiple accounts. Protection should be for at least 3 days to sort out any issues. Plasticwonder (talk) 19:10, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 20:20, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Cysquatch (talk) 19:16, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Sdrqaz. Favonian (talk) 19:32, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism and POV editing. Kansas Bear (talk) 19:51, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 20:18, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Lordo'Web (talk) 12:41, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at WP:GS/CASTE. Daniel Case (talk) 20:36, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 12:49, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 148.252.144.0/20 (talk · contribs). Partially; this catches most of the recent IPs. Sdrqaz (talk) 19:18, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism from multiple accounts. KH-1 (talk) 13:09, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator comment) I’m involved with this one and it’s had a small sock or meat farm on it today, but only one other edit by anyone else in 2024. In fairness, it would have looked like it was going to keep going, when KH filed the RFPP, so fair play to KH, but the folks doing the promo edits seem to have got bored now, or taken the hint. If this were my call, I’d want to see another sockfarm try their luck, on a different day, before handing protection, but of course, not a mop. MM (Give me info.) (Victories) 15:31, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Declined, as it seems to have subsided. It was a valid request at the time, but given the lack of incidents in the time that has passed since, protection now would not be preventative. Will add to my watchlist, though. Sdrqaz (talk) 19:18, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Frequent high level of vandalism. Vandals are not using IPs. Great Mercian (talk) 13:36, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

26 September 2024

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Edit war over the actor's pronouns; IP editor changed them after a brand new editor who hit 3RR was warned about edit warring. Sariel Xilo (talk) 17:47, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 00:31, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Various IPs adding opinionated descriptions of subject to article's lead against WP:BLP. Stefen 𝕋owers among the rest! GabGruntwerk 23:44, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 00:25, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Leonidlednev (TCL) 00:38, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bishonen | tålk 00:46, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Under attack by socks. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 15:24, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:04, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and unsourced claims from IP accounts. KingSkyLord (talk | contribs) 17:35, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Should any transfer be officially confirmed and reliably sourced, any admin can unprotect without consulting me. Daniel Case (talk) 02:19, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – persistent disruptive editing; WP:CASTE. Ekdalian (talk) 18:12, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at WP:GS/CASTE. Daniel Case (talk) 02:21, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Arab-Israeli contentions topics regulation applies here (the article relates directly to the Blue Line (withdrawal line), and therefore Hezbollah-Israeli conflict). Sincerely, Guessitsavis (she/they) (Talk) 20:25, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 02:27, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. GSK (talkedits) 20:34, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. If it continues with more IPs in the same range, feel free to request a range block at WP:ANI. GoodnightmushTalk 00:29, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Has been going on since September 9 2603:8080:D03:89D4:D1DB:4B7E:ADD6:F835 (talk) 22:05, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Pending-changes is working fine here. Elli (talk | contribs) 00:27, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Will120 (talk) 00:03, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. GoodnightmushTalk 00:24, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing. - FlightTime (open channel) 01:15, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will log at CTOPS Daniel Case (talk) 02:39, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. 2603:8080:D03:89D4:C189:1E:DE1:BF6E (talk) 02:06, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:46, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Under attack by socks. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 15:24, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. All socks ... /64 for 31 hours; registered accounts indef. Daniel Case (talk) 02:07, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:CT/AI. Skitash (talk) 17:05, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Just today's flareup. As the article also concerns an incident 10 years ago, I don't consider it directly relevant to the current conflict (and it has not been put under CTOPS, either). Daniel Case (talk) 02:10, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Someone who's wrong on the internet (talk) 17:17, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please enforce WP:CT/AP. IanDBeacon (talk) 23:47, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Also, as this article states clearly, it is about electoral colleges in general, so it's somewhat removed from AP. Daniel Case (talk) 02:14, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Waxworker (talk) 23:10, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined The /64 that had been causing the bulk of the problems has been blocked; the registered user hasn't edited since they were last warned. Daniel Case (talk) 02:35, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Per WP:CT/A-I. Pachu Kannan (talk) 01:26, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 02:42, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent IP vandalism (not unlike the last 120+ edits). Rhain (he/him) 05:40, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Aoidh (talk) 05:44, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Let's try to keep the discussion on The talk page rather than an edit summaries. Second trying 24 hours. Moxy🍁 02:19, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Again high ip vandalism after previous protection expired. Page will need longer period of protection. RangersRus (talk) 03:03, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 13:04, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Steady levels of accidental edits by new editors. Suggest permanent semi protection. Piotrus at Hanyang| reply here 04:39, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. There have been three edits in the last year, going back 10 edits goes into 2022. Aoidh (talk) 05:42, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – LTA proxy IP address. †TyphoonAmpil† (💬 - 📝 - 🌀 - 🏮) 13:12, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator ScottishFinnishRadish. Favonian (talk) 15:09, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP hatespeech vandalism, no clue why this wasn't indef already. Orchastrattor (talk) 13:21, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 15:12, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – IP was blocked for vandalism and now there is another IP evading the block and making disruptive nationalist edits. Mellk (talk) 12:45, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for two weeks. Acalamari 17:43, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jedediah78. 10mmsocket (talk) 17:14, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator ScottishFinnishRadish. Favonian (talk) 19:27, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 19:05, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Firefangledfeathers. Favonian (talk) 19:28, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent edit warring by IPs. MrOllie (talk) 17:35, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 19:47, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 18:35, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 19:38, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A lot of sustained vandalism by IPs over the last month. In fact, going back years, this article is persistently vandalised by IPs. Aszx5000 (talk) 18:53, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bishonen | tålk 19:40, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Leonidlednev (TCL) 19:49, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 19:53, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Increase to extended-confirmed due to his recent indictment and allegations, also tying to Drake. ѕιη¢єяєℓу ƒяσм, ᗰOᗪ ᑕᖇEᗩTOᖇ 🏡 🗨 📝 03:46, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. GoodnightmushTalk 18:02, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason:: Persistent block evasion by Kelowantopdog. Please see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kelownatopdog. Thank you for your time. --A.S. Brown (talk) 08:52, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. GoodnightmushTalk 18:03, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism (also IP hopping), continued after the expiration of the previous protection (just like before the last protection, the page went ca. 3 days without vandalism before continuing today). Felida97 (talk) 20:36, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:31, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: High-risk template – Over 7600 instances [118]. - FlightTime (open channel) 20:15, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected Ymblanter (talk) 21:37, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism/IP hopping (previous protection expired today and vandalism started again right away). Felida97 (talk) 20:25, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:35, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism/IP hopping (previous protection expired today and vandalism started again right away). Felida97 (talk) 20:26, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:34, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. – Pbrks (t·c) 21:35, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:39, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

27 September 2024

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There have been about a dozen vandalism edits (presumably from the same person, but different IPs) since April, claiming "homosexual" and "unnatural acts" done by the founders of the newspaper - seemingly in retaliation for publishing an article about misconduct done by the anonymous user's pastor (cf https://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=The_Pillar&diff=prev&oldid=1221687233, https://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=The_Pillar&diff=prev&oldid=1222861676, https://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=The_Pillar&diff=prev&oldid=1221312142, et alia). ~Darth StabroTalk/Contribs 15:17, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2600:1008:0:0:0:0:0:0/32 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. from the article for six months. Daniel Case (talk) 06:10, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – ANI LTA back at it again, not sure if protection is the best way to deal with it but best to ask. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 00:32, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator The Wordsmith. Favonian (talk) 05:41, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Request per Talk:Hurricane Helene (1958)#Protection needed. ClaudineChionh (she/her · talk · contribs · email) 02:47, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Acroterion. Favonian (talk) 05:41, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism from LTA Yoshi24517 (Chat) (Very Busy) 20:04, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

+1 Reason: IP Vandalism Bluethricecreamman (talk) 22:33, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined; disruption seems to have stopped for the moment. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 06:27, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: More disruption from IPs again hamster717🐉(discuss anything!🐹✈️my contribs🌌🌠) 22:54, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined: disruption seems to have stopped for the moment. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 06:28, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – More of this proxy nonsense again. This is really getting out of hand. 🛧Midori No Sora♪🛪 ( ☁=☁=✈) 22:28, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Might need to preemptively extend the protection on this page (RFPP/D) too, since that's about to expire and is the other hotspot for this "charming individual". Zinnober9 (talk) 23:33, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This request ended up on the decrease page, so marking Not done; feel free to re-request at WP:RFPP/I, although further action doesn't seem warranted at the moment (and protecting pages like the help desk should only be done as a very last resort). Extraordinary Writ (talk) 06:25, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Addition of unsourced content by multiple IPs, violation of WP:FUTURE. M S Hassan 📬✍🏻 05:49, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 13:32, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated disruptions in the infobox for most of this month, possibly even before that, which are consistently reverted, plus consistent edit-warring from IPs over the last two days: [119], [120], [121], [122], [123], [124], [125], [126], [127]. The repeated appearance of new accounts, some only active for short periods to edit almost exclusively this article, also suggests possible sockpuppet activity. R Prazeres (talk) 05:57, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. R Prazeres, Cinderella157, it would help to have talk page consensus for how to handle "Egyptian" in the infobox. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 13:38, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – One of those pages subject to perennial obnoxious tinkering for the sake of some Wikipedia:Getting to Philosophy game or something. Remsense ‥  09:07, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 13:52, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism and given how she had recently passed away, it'll only get worse. TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 13:40, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism, related to Yasuke (semi-protected for a year). Thibaut (talk) 09:20, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 11:38, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 15:19, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 15:21, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP socking. Requesting temp protection. Babysharkboss2!! (Slap me with the fish. I dare you.) 14:12, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 hour, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 14:17, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your help! Babysharkboss2!! (Slap me with the fish. I dare you.) 14:18, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated deletion of players from the squad section, even though they are part of the club's UCL squad IronMaximus (talk) 06:47, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 13:45, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason:: Persistent block evasion by Kelowantopdog. Please see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kelownatopdog. This is about the fourth or fifth time that this article in the last year has been the subject of block evasion by Kelownatopdog. No sooner does the protection expire, then he goes back to his block evasion, so if possible can this article be protected for a lengthy period of time. Thank you for your help and time. --A.S. Brown (talk) 08:55, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. We'll see if the block evasion continues. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 13:50, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: As the movie started premiering, IPs are found to adding unsourced content. Thewikizoomer (talk) 16:44, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed MNWiki845 (talk) 19:02, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 15:49, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Previous protection expired today, and the article was hijacked twice today GoingBatty (talk) 15:10, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 16:00, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

'Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism 2603:8080:D03:89D4:B0F1:827:8FD3:78B5 (talk) 23:25, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism 2603:8080:D03:89D4:B0F1:827:8FD3:78B5 (talk) 23:27, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term campaign of vandalism. Amigao (talk) 08:20, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent vandalism – High vandalism. Susbush (talk) 13:32, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 13:39, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent mass deletion of content by IPs. Lard Almighty (talk) 09:56, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 14:16, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IP-hopping user persistently adding unsourced content under inane edit summaries - not responsive to warnings on their various talk pages. AntiDionysius (talk) 11:40, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Jake Wartenberg's recent rangeblock may have handled this. Re-request if not. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 14:25, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Addition of unsourced content and edit warring. M S Hassan 📬✍🏻 12:53, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined consider an edit warring report if it continues Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 14:32, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent but slow paced vandalism from an IP hopping individual. A few weeks of protection might deter them.  Velella  Velella Talk   12:57, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How about indefinite semi-protection 2600:100C:B03C:EDA6:61B1:AA3D:FE29:C58D (talk) 13:20, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 14:38, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Indefinite extended confirmed protection Arbitration Enforcement, WP:PIA, and maybe WP:ARBEE. Protoeus (talk) 13:17, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 14:43, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

- AVYSZ (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Reason: High level of IP vandalism and potential dispute due to brand sensitivity. Protection level: Semi-protection — Preceding unsigned comment added by AVYSZ (talkcontribs) 20:59, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. I believe the intended target here was User:AVYSZ. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 13:29, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
So do you mean you will wait till some body tries to hack it or make changes ? 2405:201:101B:4820:1D51:599D:C5EB:6DF8 (talk) 15:00, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent string of IP vandalism. Amigao (talk) 13:58, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 15:13, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations – Sporadic but persistent BLPVIOs. Woodroar (talk) 15:24, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 15:30, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – See history, IP is slow editwarring, please protect to encourage discussion. - FlightTime (open channel) 15:44, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Gave them a warning. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 15:34, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Frost 16:32, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 15:41, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – This topic relates partly or fully with antisemitism as it pertains to the Arab-Israeli conflict. Especially with regards to this Washington Post article. Should be treated as such. Also Working definition of antisemitism should be ECP'd. Awesome Aasim 17:56, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 15:56, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Indefinite ECP WP:RUSUKR and WP:ARBBLP. Protoeus (talk) 18:44, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 15:57, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and disruptive editing. Just look at the history!2603:8080:D03:89D4:B0F1:827:8FD3:78B5 (talk) 23:39, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Pending changes is fine. Bbb23 (talk) 16:00, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – User Gurvir singh 123 keeps removing content from the article based on their personal viewpoint. Requesting adequate page protection to prevent this disruption by a new user. MaplesyrupSushi (talk) 23:49, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Protection duration: indefinite 2603:8080:D03:89D4:50C3:305B:40E1:7545 (talk) 23:55, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 17:17, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Suggest indefinite autoconfirmed protection. Almost every edit to the page for the last four (if not fourteen) years has been vandalism by IPs or new/few-edit accounts, or reverts thereof. As long as the long-running IRL debate (among people who like or dislike warlocks) over what the word 'really means' continues, I see no reason to think on-wiki vandalism will ever stop. Few if any productive edits are made to this page by non-autoconfirmed editors; indeed, other than vandalism and reverts thereof, few edits are made to the page at all (cf. the few differences between 2021, 100 revisions ago, and now). -sche (talk) 01:20, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 17:18, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Hello administrator, I am sorry to bug you, but I just realized that it is likely a former disgruntled employee is a new editor who added a whole paragraph (last paragraph under research) that cited dubious sources to make his personal opinion known. This paragraph includes references to a linkedin post, a medium article, and some other company websites that are not related to the article at hand. The information in that paragraph simply cannot be found via these cited sources and is only known among the current and former employees of Polymathic AI. I hope there is a way to move the article back to its former form before August 2024? Thanks for helping! 173.72.38.219 (talk) 04:05, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 17:18, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – It seems like this talk page gets frequently edited with useless commentary by IPs and new accounts, and is unlikely to get good requests. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 06:57, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 17:19, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: one (or two) IP user(s) vandalise the page by adding random things repeatedly despite the random things were removed Request: semi-protection for 1 month or more (if can) Foxy Husky (talk) 11:21, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Bbb23 (talk) 17:20, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Anonymous user repeating information that's already there Dipper Dalmatian (talk) 11:30, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Bbb23 (talk) 17:22, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Reverting GAMERBOY102 (talk) 11:49, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi 2600:100C:B03C:EDA6:61B1:AA3D:FE29:C58D (talk) 13:23, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 17:23, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Indefinite ECP Arbitration Enforcement Falls over WP:RUSUKR. Protoeus (talk) 17:37, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 15:55, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Bbb23 Please, it’s not disruptive editing, It’s a WP:RUSUKR enforcement, if not, all contentious topics would just be semi-protected. Protoeus (talk) 18:37, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. FishLoveHam (talk) 14:11, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 17:25, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple IPs personally attacking the subject. These edits are worded simliarly to each other. Replicative Cloverleaf (talk) 21:21, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 72 hours (or 432 consecutive sin-binnings), after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —C.Fred (talk) 21:28, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

28 September 2024

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – An IP user keeps changing the URL in infobox when it is not even broken. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 [𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺] 16:56, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Not vandalism. Template:URL shoulnd't be used that way, 98Tigerius Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 15:55, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Alright I understood. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 [𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺] 19:24, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – She's just died, and the formatting of the page is suffering greatly from a bunch of (probably good faith) edits trying to add that fact. AntiDionysius (talk) 13:22, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already done by administrator Acalamari. Airplaneman (talk) 00:43, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Hopefully submitting the right request level this time around; IP range edit-warring to attempt to force their preferred plot summary; haven't engaged with Talk page discussion. DonIago (talk) 19:26, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – LTA proxy. †TyphoonAmpil† (💬 - 📝 - 🌀 - 🏮) 13:35, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already done by administrator 331dot. Airplaneman (talk) 00:44, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent new events causing increased vandalism, likely to continue and increase. Cerebral726 (talk) 18:10, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) 00:45, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I request the protection of the Mali war page, due to the additions of Bazinga2234 who is trying to relay conspiracy theories. Thank you. Tan Khaerr (talk) 20:20, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Airplaneman (talk) 00:49, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Airplaneman (talk) 01:41, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A spate of new accounts vandalising - presumably some kind of off-wiki coordination. AntiDionysius (talk) 23:47, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) 00:52, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP's and brand new users keep changing the lead to emphasize the Persianness of this Arabic-language work, often implying it is in fact written in Persian. It has been discussed to death on the talk page but the IP's keep doing it without paying any attention to discussion. This is a long-term issue as can be seen by scrolling the page history.--Ermenrich (talk) 18:11, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 01:54, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Skitash (talk) 18:33, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Protection expired today and it was immediately vandalised by several IPs/accouts. Will need longer-term protection I'm afraid. Aszx5000 (talk) 22:05, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will put CTOPS notice on talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 02:04, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – LTA spammer. Estopedist1 (talk) 06:37, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:12, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Per WP:GSCASTE. Ratnahastin (talk) 09:53, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. And logged at GS/CASTE. Daniel Case (talk) 02:17, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Last couple of days the article has been vandalized by a collection of brand new sock accounts. Article has been sent to AfD twice in the last 48 hours in an attempt to get rid of the article. Dr vulpes (Talk) 11:35, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Star Mississippi. for one month. An article being nominated for deletion is, by the way, never a reason to protect it. Daniel Case (talk) 02:22, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Continual unsourced additions from IP editors. Previously had a one year 'pending changes' protection lock for disruptive editing, however the disruptive editing has persistent since the protection ended Michaeldble (talk) 16:08, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:25, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistant disruptive edits by IPs since late August. Catfurball (talk) 16:19, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:31, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – WP:LTA/BMX target since 10:36, 19 June 2024‎. Normally I wouldn't request protection on a talk page, but there's been zero constructive discussion in months, just vandalism. Alith Anar 16:56, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:33, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Per WP:CT/A-I. Pachu Kannan (talk) 19:21, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. And logging at CTOPS under this title while it remains the title. Daniel Case (talk) 02:38, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Per WP:CT/A-I. Pachu Kannan (talk) 19:21, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Not logging now that it's a redirect. Daniel Case (talk) 02:46, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Started in again as soon as the protection lapsed. Remsense ‥  22:51, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:51, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This page has been protected for over a decade, and is only now getting more attention thanks to a user expanding it. Maybe it'd help if this page could be unprotected, because everyone could help the user expanding the page. I myself made an edit request to fix a typo, and, if necessary, this page could have pending changes instead. There also hasn't been much disruption to this page in a while. Only now is it higher traffic than it has been even before the protection. 12.74.154.15 (talk) 20:18, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected The protecting admin hasn't edited in nine years, so I have taken it upon myself to take this step. Daniel Case (talk) 02:57, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Indefinite semi-protection: persistent vandalism 2603:8080:D03:89D4:B0F1:827:8FD3:78B5 (talk) 23:42, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 02:07, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism 2603:8080:D03:89D4:B0F1:827:8FD3:78B5 (talk) 23:43, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Probably because it isn't edited much to begin with. Daniel Case (talk) 02:08, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Disruptive editing by COI editors. C F A 💬 01:59, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 02:10, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Cahk (talk) 07:52, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: Mao Zedong Still a better peson than bryan adams (talk · contribs) blocked by Zzuzz. Indef, and account globally locked. Daniel Case (talk) 02:14, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism, LTA Yoshi24517 (Chat) (Very Busy) 18:18, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, the irony Babysharkboss2!! (Slap me with the fish. I dare you.) 18:18, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. Airplaneman (talk) 00:59, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 04:01, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 05:13, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content, continued after protection expired. Waxworker (talk) 04:33, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 05:14, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

INDEFINITE semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and disruptive editing. IP vandalized Oregon and Washington articles 3 weeks earlier and then an administrator semi-protected Oregon indefinitely and Washington for one year. The IP vandalized this article FIVE times today. There have been at least 8 previous protections and nothing seems to be working. Time for indef semi 2603:8080:D03:89D4:877:EA69:42DE:1241 (talk) 22:00, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 116.12.3.104 (talk · contribs) blocked by Kusma. for 72 hours. Daniel Case (talk) 02:48, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Sporadic vandalism by IPs and registered/unregistered editors alike. 𝚈𝚘𝚟𝚝 (𝚝𝚊𝚕𝚔𝚟𝚝) 22:42, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. That's another way of saying "sporadic". Daniel Case (talk) 02:48, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Hurricane caused significant damage please protect. BryceM2001 (talk) 01:16, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Protection may be inappropriate for merely disruptive editing. Pages are not protected pre-emptively and the amount of vandalism has been manageable. However, I do believe it could become a target for sockpuppets in the near future, but that's irrelevant here. GeorgeMemulous (talk) 01:48, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Declined per above. Daniel Case (talk) 02:52, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations – SPORTSTRANS. Will120 (talk) 02:27, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 02:53, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism. ClaudineChionh (she/her · talk · contribs · email) 05:05, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 05:23, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Logged as enforcement for WP:CT/BLP. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 05:23, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. 176.222.3.98 (talk) 21:20, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This request would need to be made at the equivalent board on bg.wikipedia, not here. —C.Fred (talk) 21:23, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think there is a equivalent board. 176.222.3.98 (talk) 21:30, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That doesn't mean we can do anything about it here. Ask a steward. Daniel Case (talk) 23:09, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not done. See above. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 05:25, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Daniel Quinlan (talk) 05:24, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi protection IP hopper censoring information. --Dympies (talk) 06:20, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 09:37, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term IP block evasions and other disruptions. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 06:35, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 09:38, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Per WP:GSCASTE, non-stop caste based disruption by new editors and IPs. One such example. Ratnahastin (talk) 07:05, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Johnuniq (talk) 09:42, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent BLP violations by IPs. Lard Almighty (talk) 07:35, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 09:45, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Addition of long plot again and again by IPs, violation of WP:TVPLOT. M S Hassan 📬✍🏻 08:31, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 09:47, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing in the last days. Xexerss (talk) 08:40, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 09:48, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Two days semi-protect of talk page Extreme levels of IP disruption, much of it defamatory, following his likely assassination yesterday. Jeppiz (talk) 09:01, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of wo days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 09:31, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Its been 2 months and the edits are slowing down, 2 edit requests, plus most of the drama is on the assassination attempt not crooks himself 2D Is Better Than 3D (talk) 01:11, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@2D Is Better Than 3D: This page was protected under the auspices of a contentious topic (post-1992 politics of the United States) and cannot be unilaterally unprotected. Appeal the protection at WP:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement or WP:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 03:36, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not unprotected: the protection cannot be undone through this process, per above. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 03:16, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. 176.222.3.98 (talk) 21:17, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. OhNoitsJamie Talk 21:18, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Donnowin1 (talk) 08:55, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 09:49, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism, coming from new single purpose accounts and IP addresses. Twofortnights (talk) 11:39, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 11:48, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: permanent extended protection with pending changes log enabled I think the admins need to put a permanent extended protection tag in this page, given the severity of biographical violations that are happening in this page since its creation.

For the last 4 years since he came into limelight, there have been multiple instances where random IPs and newbies come and change his birth place nonstop

despite consensus reached at the talk page three years ago here

and here are last 10 instances when that has happened : 12345678910 which even caused one user to lose his editing privilige in the page. Multiple short protections here have all proved to be futile and this is the time for putting a permanent lock in this page.zoglophie•talk• 11:05, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. I don't think the page requires a protection level above that at this time, but if (and/or when) that changes, feel free to relist. Thank you for the comprehensive report. El_C 13:23, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism that's changing the party's ideology from the cited centre-left to an uncited conservatism/centre-right and other unrelated edit improvements to the page being reverted. DennisXD (talk) 11:38, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Untrue. There haven't been any IP edits or vandalism, and the editor has not engaged in any discussions relating to a content dispute. There are citations clearly visible proving the party is centre-right and conservative. I have invited the editor to join the discussion on the talk page, again. CROIXtalk 12:20, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. DennisXD, please observe WP:NOTVANDALISM. Failure to do so counts as personal attack, which is sanctionable. CROIX, not that it really matters, but I've glanced at one of your edits from 2021, and the ideology for the edits you saved remained the longstanding version, centre-left. Now, you are welcome to advance a different position with a centre-right contending version, but please observe WP:ONUS, which states: The responsibility for achieving consensus for inclusion is on those seeking to include disputed content. To you both: needless to say (but I'll still say it), edit warring in general is sanctionable. Thank you. El_C 13:38, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
DennisXD, to be clear, you are required to engage the discussion that CROIX initiated, or you'd be forfeiting your position. I'm not implying you don't intend to or anything, as it was only posted today, but just trying to clarify the basic, uh, mechanics here. El_C 13:48, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Disruptive edits by IPs again and again. M S Hassan 📬✍🏻 13:02, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:40, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Socking resumed immediately after previous protection expired 172.85.253.102 (talk) 19:06, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Discospinster. Favonian (talk) 20:37, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent socking for a month 172.85.253.102 (talk) 19:06, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Discospinster. Favonian (talk) 20:00, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Socking resumed within hours of protection expiring 134.6.152.218 (talk) 19:38, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Discospinster. Favonian (talk) 20:00, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism after page protection expires. 🔥YesI'mOnFire🔥(ContainThisEmber?) 15:57, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Bbb23 (talk) 17:50, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Waxworker (talk) 16:36, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:00, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. M S Hassan 📬✍🏻 18:24, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:03, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Previously protected for same reason, IPs edit warring over unsoruced content. CNMall41 (talk) 19:04, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:04, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Uptick in socking 134.6.152.218 (talk) 19:39, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment For the last 4 entries - socking has not been impeded due to the expiration of 1-month semiprotection. One year from here seems reasonable. See also the article's edit histories for previous reverted socks and where socking is likely to continue. GeorgeMemulous (talk) 19:43, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 20:58, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended protection: Arbitration Enforcement. Nythar (💬-🍀) 19:46, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected Ymblanter (talk) 20:52, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

29 September 2024

Reason: CTOPS ARBPIA. Borgenland (talk) 14:03, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please also enforce WP:CT/IRP. IanDBeacon (talk) 16:22, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Done. El_C 01:31, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:CT/AI. Skitash (talk) 15:39, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. El_C 01:29, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Per WP:CT/A-I. Pachu Kannan (talk) 16:12, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. El_C 01:31, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP-hopping vandal using too large a range for block. Paris1127 (talk) 22:23, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 01:38, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: ip vandalism / unexplained removal of cited material twice Pallikari ap' ta Sfakia 01:27, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 01:35, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Continued vandalism due to the Summer Olympics Women's Boxing controversy. 50.39.207.32 (talk) 21:34, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. SleepDeprivedGinger (talk) 21:58, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 02:43, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – silly vandals. ZimZalaBim talk 22:18, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:52, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Frequent disruptive edits within the past month. Schützenpanzer (Talk) 23:18, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:47, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: A dynamic IP editor, probably a sock of the blocked IP who was doing it before, keeps changing to title case where WP style is sentence case. I'm trying to elicit a response at a talk page, but don't really expect one. Dicklyon (talk) 23:21, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:48, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Protection log shows that the vandalism returns every time it expires. Request indef this time based on recent vandalism. Raladic (talk) 02:31, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 02:55, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended protection: Arbitration Enforcement. Nythar (💬-🍀) 22:38, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. El_C 01:36, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended protection: Arbitration Enforcement. Nythar (💬-🍀) 22:38, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. El_C 01:36, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Falls under WP:CT/A-I. IanDBeacon (talk) 00:53, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. El_C 01:32, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of unsourced edits and manipulation by IPs. Ab207 (talk) 03:06, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:32, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism from Pakistani IP. CurryTime7-24 (talk) 21:04, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2401:BA80:AC93:1952:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Pickersgill-Cunliffe. for 31 hours. Daniel Case (talk) 02:35, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Untamed1910 (talk) 02:17, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: Aufhebung1917 (talk · contribs) blocked by PhilKnight. Indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 02:50, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Multiple new accounts voting to keep (more than once). Not sure if AFD discussions are protected, so my bad if they aren't. APK hi :-) (talk) 06:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Daniel. Favonian (talk) 09:38, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Zac67 (talk) 06:55, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. @Zac67: Please try to make greater efforts to explain the reasons for these reverts, both in edit summaries and on user talk pages. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 07:30, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – publishing and performance rights organization that is currently blocking music on Youtube due to a rights dispute with Google. Getting either drive-by vandalism from IPs or additions to a list of affected artists not supported by a reliable source. Doc StrangeMailboxLogbook 14:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 15:12, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In the section Views on international politics, there is a subsection entitled Pre-2000 Israeli occupation of Lebanon. That subsection has a bulleted list of quotes where the first begins with "If we are to expel...". That quote has a typo in it where it currently reads in part:

nor on the United Nations ....t of one

It is unclear what t was meant to means. What's worse, this quote has no source, so the reader can not find the original and determine this for themselves. The lack of a source reference and the typo both need to be fixed. Marcus T. V. Stassinopolus (talk) 12:39, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done I have added a source for the quote and corrected the quote based on it. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 13:11, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The original Washington Post interview is in the article as a reference too (ref name="Wright") if any other errors turn up. Sean.hoyland (talk) 13:17, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 16:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing and vandalism since yesterday. Elserbio00 (talk) 12:28, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

+1 Reason: wholesale vandalism by IPs. Also request indefinite extended confirmed protection as a CTOPS ARBPIA article. Borgenland (talk) 12:50, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator ScottishFinnishRadish. Favonian (talk) 17:05, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of BLP vandalism. 38.141.208.35 (talk) 15:31, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New vandalism after automatic unprotecting. Requesting ongoing semi-protection for period of 1 year. 38.141.208.35 (talk) 15:36, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 16:48, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – WP:LTA/BMX. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 16:07, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 16:55, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

30 September 2024

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Might be a good idea to extend the current page protection. Bring it in line with the talk page which is also protected (indefinite) due to ongoing sockuppetry and disruption. Propose a ~3 month extension. KH-1 (talk) 05:11, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent unconstructive editing by multiple IPs. PadFoot (talk) 11:12, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@PadFoot2008: Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Special:Diff/1247818886 also seems consistent with the Manual of Style. Sdrqaz (talk) 20:07, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Idiosincrático (talk) 16:25, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. This is primarily 2.51.114.107 (talk · contribs · WHOIS)'s work. They've received a final warning and hasn't edited since; protection is not for single users. Sdrqaz (talk) 20:07, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Indefinite semi-protection. Persistent vandalism. New user, sockpuppets, and IPs keep adding “sigma” to the article. They also replace “Colorado” with sigma in the U.S. state infobox. This started on August 21-present. It’s clearly not going to stop. The most recent edit was from a Rio Rancho IP, which got reverted due to adding “sigma”2603:8080:D03:89D4:2900:AE0F:8D3A:CD05 (talk) 19:21, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator comment) There hasn't been much disruption since the article was placed on pending-changes protection on 8 September (only two reverted edits since then). PC changes might be fine for now. 73.67.145.30 (talk) 19:58, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
(edit conflict) Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Since pending-changes was imposed three weeks ago, it's been disrupted twice. Pending changes is more that capable of handling that level of disruption. Sdrqaz (talk) 20:07, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: page has had heavy edit warring and vandalism since atl east october 2023, should receive extended protection as soon as possible. Prakashs27 (talk) 19:45, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. You are the only person to have edited this article in the last three months. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 19:50, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Since the past few days, people have been changing images, names a lot. It is a hassle to change it back everytime. It has happened 4 times if I can recollect correctly.

It gets around 1500 views every day and people are very eager to make changes. Requesting protection for a few years, atleast till his chief ministerial term finishes in 2028.

Requesting protection till: 2028-12-01 Skratata69 (talk) 05:43, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:19, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Genre warrior IP address keeps removing sourced content and adding "screamo" over and over. He uses different IPs so a block itself probably would not do any good. Lil Sad Lil Happy (talk) 10:18, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:20, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – BLP that falls under the purview of WP:CT/A-I which has been the repeated target of a COI sockputtetry campaign. IPs are now restoring the banned user's addition. Bobby Cohn (talk) 12:44, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:26, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP vandalism and edit-warring after page got unprotected. M S Hassan 📬✍🏻 15:29, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:28, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Over the past month, 5 IPs and 2 new single-purpose accounts (Brad O'Reillys & Jim2032) have been adding in unsourced names and other information about the article subject's supposed relatives (e.g., [128]). This has been an issue in the past, going back to at least 2021, although never at the current pace of edits. – notwally (talk) 17:07, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:30, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing by IPs and new users. Johnj1995 (talk) 17:36, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:42, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations – Repeated addition of unsourced WP:DOB by IP editor. IP editor was banned 5 days ago for 24 hours, when a new account (WillMarch12) made same edits and was banned as well. IP editor is now back restoring DOB. – notwally (talk) 17:45, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I've also reblocked the IP. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:44, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – WP:LTA/BMX. IanDBeacon (talk) 18:19, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:46, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruption. Many IPs adding non-English content to the page. 73.67.145.30 (talk) 18:52, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:48, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent vandalism to this BLP by IP addresses since 21:52, 13 September 2024‎. Alith Anar 20:08, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:50, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP Vandalism. (https://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Special:Contributions/2804:1690:800:2DC0:85AA:7820:6255:661B) There's a talk page to discuss potential changes (with sources) that is being currently ignored by this IP. 2804:29B8:50B0:1E83:6088:9A8A:7F27:8F5D (talk) 20:33, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:53, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Serves no purpose and is unlikely to ever be created for a legitimate reason. GSK (talkedits) 20:57, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:54, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism. 73.67.145.30 (talk) 21:04, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:55, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry: LTA target. Leonidlednev (TCL) 22:16, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 33 hrs, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:01, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Possible college assignment gone out of hand. None of the suspected students are communicating. I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 22:30, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:03, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism and edit warring Flabshoe1 (talk) 23:22, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:08, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Vandalism edit by Anon IP Address. Gunther :  Talk  23:48, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:10, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by a LTA. Isla🏳️‍⚧ 00:18, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:12, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent addition of unsourced content. Noah, BSBATalk 02:20, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 24 hrs, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:25, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 02:26, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Daniel Quinlan It looks like we cross protected at close to the same moment. Feel free to restore your protection if you want. -Ad Orientem (talk) 02:27, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Ad Orientem: It's fine, thanks. It looks like the fatality numbers are the primary target of unsourced changes and perhaps that will settle down in a day, but I suspect it will take longer. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 02:33, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent vandalism. Charliehdb (talk) 11:53, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. I note this appears to be a new user who may be confused. Let's tread lightly here to the extent possible. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:22, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Several IP users keep adding random phone numbers, email addresses, and links throughout the page, mainly making random words link to the Bangladesh wiki page for no reason. TechnoKittyCat (talk) 02:34, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:57, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. TechnoKittyCat (talk) 02:59, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Disruptive editing. HorrorLover555 (talk) 02:56, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:59, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinate extended-confirmed protection: Arbitration Enforcement, and WP:CT/AI. Especially considering the death of Nasrallah, and the Israeli airstrikes on Beirut. 142.114.181.79 (talk) 15:53, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I don't see any current disruptive editing. And FYI, pages aren't preempitvely protected. IanDBeacon (talk) 17:07, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:29, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Edit warring over the status of Western Sahara. Twofortnights (talk) 17:34, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:33, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive edits by unregistered user. Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 17:36, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. I've issued a level II warning. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:40, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated addition of unsourced comments about a named individual, made from various IP addresses beginning 2a02:7c:b46d:8f00. No suggestion of sockpuppetry – I’m assuming it’s a dynamically allocated address from his/her internet provider. Suggest pending changes protection, given that the named individual is the subject of court proceedings. Northernhenge (talk) 21:32, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. 2A02:C7C:B46D:8F00:0:0:0:0/64 x 1 week. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:58, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
IP is now using an address outside the previous range. —Northernhenge (talk) 20:36, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Permanent extended-confirmed protection. Article fits well under WP:CT/HORN. Back and forth edit warring on the map file that shows significantly different revisions. Many of the users reverting have said that they are edit warring to make Somalia look "better". Ecrusized (talk) 22:44, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Just because you can do something, doesn't mean you should. Very little evidence of disruption. If that changes, comeback. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:05, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Permanent extended-confirmed protection. Article fits well under WP:CT/HORN. Back and forth edit warring on the map file that shows significantly different revisions. Many of the users reverting have said that they are edit warring to make Somalia look "better". Ecrusized (talk) 22:44, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Just because you can do something, doesn't mean you should. Very little evidence of disruption. If that changes, comeback. -Ad Orientem (talk) 02:06, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Ongoing edit war over "years active", continuing despite talk-page discussion. DuncanHill (talk) 23:19, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Things seem to have calmed down. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:07, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Long term disruption from an IP hopper. Article was previously protected x 1 month. Suggest something a bit longer. I am WP:INVOLVED. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've blocked their /34 from editing this page; I think that should be sufficient? Elli (talk | contribs) 01:18, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. With thanks to Elli. -Ad Orientem (talk) 02:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Please semiprotect indefinitely. Almost edits to this page are new accounts or IPs like me, just graffiti-ing the page, or they're established users undoing the graffiti. The only exceptions in the last couple of years are [129] and [130], by autoconfirmed users. I think this edit in 2021 was the last productive edit that would have been prevented by semiprotection. 123.51.107.94 (talk) 02:12, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. No edits in more than 2 months. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:15, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: 15-year salt. It is at least an acceptable redirect (see Maugerite Perrin, misspelling). Hyphenation Expert (talk) 04:58, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected. (Marguerite is actually the correct spelling; the article was mistaken.) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 05:35, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Edit warring. HorrorLover555 (talk) 03:19, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Checking to see if protection is necessary. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 07:58, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 08:05, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 08:05, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of bad editing without sources, wrong grammar due to him being in the news recently (elected as Deputy Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu Skratata69 (talk) 04:26, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Protected due to BLP violations. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 08:20, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A request was made yesterday, but presumably was denied. Disruptive editing from IP and new users continue to be a problem. CurryTime7-24 (talk) 06:02, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 08:16, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Not so long article, some content was removed. Warthunder20 (talk) 01:08, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. The content was removed for valid reasons, as you can see in the article's edit history. ~Anachronist (talk) 01:23, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The user has also been blocked indef. Daniel Case (talk) 03:18, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:PIA. Bunnypranav (talk) 06:45, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 08:21, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protection: Repeatedly recreated. M S Hassan 📬✍🏻 07:09, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @M S Hassan: I only protected this for 4 days because it seems likely that a sourced article will be created at some point. Please submit a new request if needed. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 08:28, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Frost 08:21, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 08:31, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 08:35, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 13:53, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Creation protected indefinitely. For the bot. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 14:18, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Someone keeps on deleting the Controversy subsection from this politician's page. It's happened twice so far from two different devices used from nonregistered accounts. I am requesting protection for the article to prevent this from happening. The source of the claims is a local newspaper that won national awards for its reporting. So there is no justification in removing it, especially since the nonregistered user is claiming it to be false reporting without a source.  Eric Schucht (talk) 10:08, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @Eric Schucht: Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution to resolve the dispute. Even if sourced, please make sure the article complies with WP:BLP. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 15:04, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Here again with this one. Mainly ip vandalism. Knitsey (talk) 12:30, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 15:07, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent block evasion. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 13:10, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@AlphaBetaGamma you may wish to request this for Sharon Green Middleton, too. The person who's been persistently editing my talk page has also been making racist edits to that page for the past few months, and has returned to doing so after the page came off its three-month protection recently. Y2hyaXM (talk) 13:12, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Logged as enforcement for WP:CT/BLP. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 15:14, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 15:10, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 13:16, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Logged as enforcement for WP:CT/BLP. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 15:14, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Self-requested. Leonidlednev (TCL) 13:46, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 13:49, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 14:24, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. One account was blocked for 24 hours for edit warring and a second account was warned. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 15:30, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 15:19, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Kurnahusa (talk) 16:21, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

+1 Reason: High level of IPs vandalism to delete context Mirzidad (talk) 16:21, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 16:45, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Move protected – Moving the article will require consensus at WP:RM. Favonian (talk) 17:22, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: content removal Magherbin (talk) 08:47, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 14:46, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP vandalism on a contentious redirect. Yes I am a nerd -XCBRO172 (How could you tell?) 17:17, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:PIA. Yes I am a nerd -XCBRO172 (How could you tell?) 17:19, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 17:56, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism due to recent controversy on Twitter. ViviGayming (talk) 18:11, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 18:40, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The article has been added to with charged language and poorly documented claims. 81.191.159.232 (talk) 18:36, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 18:40, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Something higher than Extended confirmed protection but not full protection: Vandalism from extended-confirmed user. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 16:06, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 16:14, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Various IPs keep trying to replace the easy to read list of notable people with difficult to read paragraphs of notable people. Skywatcher68 (talk) 17:46, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 20:10, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 20:10, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 18:18, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 20:06, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Autoconfirmed protection or pending changes would be appropriate as the same IP (see /64 range) keeps deleting the same content over and over again. 10mmsocket (talk) 18:58, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 20:03, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Leonidlednev (TCL) 20:09, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 20:12, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 20:05, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected Ymblanter (talk) 20:08, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – An IP user keeps vandalising this page. A rangeblock (on 2001:D08:DA:4000:0:0:0:0/51 (talk · contribs)) has not caught all of it, and the problem persists. It has leaked on to a couple of other pages too - should I bring this to AIV instead?. AntiDionysius (talk) 20:27, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 20:34, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

LAND ACKNOWLEDGMENT We at Fox Run occupy the ancestral home of the Anishnaabe people of The Three Fires Confederacy: Ojibwa, Odawa, and Potawatomi. We humbly honor these people with the understanding that we cannot change the past but must work to ensure

Please make sense out of this 2601:40D:8203:C860:81F7:B12A:72F3:C234 (talk) 17:57, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined I don't know what you're looking for here but it certainly isn't an edit request. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 18:02, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]