Talk:NewJeans
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the NewJeans article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 14 days |
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
Text has been copied to or from this article; see the list below. The source pages now serve to provide attribution for the content in the destination pages and must not be deleted as long as the copies exist. For attribution and to access older versions of the copied text, please see the history links below.
|
Content regarding the new Instagram for NewJeans
edit@Phibeatrice, I noticed you wanted to discuss the information I removed. While I understand the relevance of mentioning that the account was opened outside of Ador, I’m not sure how including details about what they post on SNS adds to the discussion. You may feel their page isn’t overly crowded, but considering the significant amount of information already here about the issue with Ador, adding more might make it overwhelming. I believe one concise sentence gets the point across effectively. Btspurplegalaxy 💬 🖊️ 09:40, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- I appreciate the openness to discussion. My original disagreement was with the extent of how much was removed originally. I can agree with not having to go into the details of what they posted or how many followers they gained, but I think we should at least keep two sentences: one about the account's opening, and one about ADOR threatening legal action against it. If you can make those two points in one sentence as well, then that's great.
- A sentence I am somewhat committed to is about their participation in the Yoon Suk Yeol impeachment rally. It was the very first decisive, planned, organized effort initiated by the NewJeans members and was reported in tandem with the account's opening. I agree with you that we shouldn't report on very single little thing that the account posts (they post a lot), but I would slightly advocate for the possibility of at least including that—even in a reduced form added to the first sentence.
- The line about how many followers they gained is obviously not as relevant and can go. Phibeatrice (talk) 15:56, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- I would suggest removing any mention of what they post, as it’s not relevant to the issue with Ador. The focus should remain on the key points: the account’s creation and Ador’s threat of legal action against it. I believe that’s sufficient and concise. While it’s unclear what else might be added to the article, including unnecessary details could risk making it feel disorganized. Btspurplegalaxy 💬 🖊️ 10:36, 13 January 2025 (UTC)