Talk:WEPN-FM

Latest comment: 2 months ago by Daniel Case in topic New info wepn now tj

Untitled

edit

Like WWPR-FM, this article has POV and encyclopedicity problems. 18.26.0.18 00:54, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)

WXLO redirect

edit

The WXLO redirect needs to be removed because there is an station in Worcester, Mass. with that existing call sign. The redirect needs to be removed to reserve it for a future article with the existing call sign in that location. I think this reference and the existing location has no connection from what I know. Steven312 19:06, 5 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:WRKS-FM.png

edit
 

Image:WRKS-FM.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 04:54, 16 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

An image on this page may be deleted

edit

This is an automated message regarding an image used on this page. The image File:99x.jpg, found on WRKS, has been nominated for deletion because it does not meet Wikipedia image policy. Please see the image description page for more details. If this message was sent in error (that is, the image is not up for deletion, or was left on the wrong talk page), please contact this bot's operator. STBotI (talk) 00:26, 28 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Comment on the last paragraph: The target audience did not change in 2007. Black listeners 25-54 have been the target audience for over a decade. Secondly, why is the contributor typing in capital letters? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.255.173.36 (talk) 18:13, 17 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on WEPN-FM. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:35, 25 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

WEPN Rumored to be in talks to be taken over by Good Karma Brands via LMA

edit

https://radioink.com/2021/07/14/is-espn-radio-bailing-in-new-york-city/?

https://nypost.com/2021/07/13/espn-may-leave-local-radio-business-as-wfan-dominates/

There are talks out there that WEPN-FM could have an LMA with Good Karma Brands if its verified.2601:640:C681:C260:E615:8CC:C86B:3E6A (talk) 03:38, 17 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Request vandalism protection

edit

Can we get vandalism protection where only signed in users can edit Mikey551415 (talk) 03:40, 1 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

New info wepn now tj

edit

98.7 Is now TJ A pop up radio Station I live in state and read articles like crazy please see attached for more info. The station may be temporarily as they are trying to sell the station 98.7 now TJ 98.7 a pop up radio station Mikey551415 (talk) 05:20, 1 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Yes, I know. The history section of the article already mentions all that. The format section on the infobox also notes that the station is stunting, which means it’s a temporary format. DrPepperIsNotACola (talk) 05:25, 1 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
Ok Mikey551415 (talk) 05:26, 1 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
Also, even though WEPN-FM no longer broadcasts ESPN, that doesn’t change that the call sign still means ESPN. That’s why it has to stay there. You also can’t put the station slogan in the infobox under branding. The branding should only be listed as “TJ 98.7”. The logo is copyrighted and cannot be licensed under a Creative Commons license on Wikimedia Commons. DrPepperIsNotACola (talk) 05:30, 1 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
It isn’t but okay Mikey551415 (talk) 06:07, 1 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
You can get the images anywhere Mikey551415 (talk) 06:08, 1 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
Republishing the logos in a news story is an example of fair use. That doesn't change that the logo is copyrighted and can't be posted to Wikimedia Commons under the CC license. People using it in other things like YouTube videos or social media posts may be able to under fair use but otherwise have no permission to use it since the logo is copyrighted. It has to be uploaded to Wikipedia with a fair use rationale, just like the logo for Z100 is. DrPepperIsNotACola (talk) 06:44, 1 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
Okay Mikey551415 (talk) 04:16, 2 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
Ahem ... it's not quite that simple.
If a logo consists of just simple text and/or common shapes, no more than one sentence, in a commonly used typeface, it has not crossed the threshold of originality and thus cannot be copyrighted. Further, if it was published without a copyright notice prior to 1978 (as most logos then were; I assume this is about the WOR logo in the article?) it also, under the laws of that era, entered the public domain. Daniel Case (talk) 03:00, 3 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
Just like z100 or WPLG Mikey551415 (talk) 06:08, 1 September 2024 (UTC)Reply