Krishnpremi

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vijaya Lakshm (July 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CFA was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vijaya Lakshm and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

C F A 💬 23:16, 24 July 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Krishnpremi! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! C F A 💬 23:16, 24 July 2024 (UTC)

Unexplained Edit Warring

Kindly, open a discussion on talk page rather than reverting my edits. I have rearranged the lead as by the guidelines of WP:MOS, if u are not familiar with Wikipedia policies it doesn't mean that you revert constructive edits. Seyamar_(245CMR)^💬📜 15:20, 19 September 2024 (UTC)

September 2024

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war at Lakshmi; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Someguywhosbored (talk) 09:36, 20 September 2024 (UTC))

A belated welcome!

The welcome may be belated, but the cookies are still warm!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Krishnpremi! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

• Introductory tutorial
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The Teahouse

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Asteramellus (talk) 20:32, 20 September 2024 (UTC)

@Krishnpremi I see you have been trying to add content on Lakshmi and other related pages, but your edits are getting reverted. I think getting familiarized with wiki editing will help you become successful editor. e.g. I think, from what I understand, your point on Lakshmi page to add other vahanas (because they are already mentioned in the article with sources). If you can see on the talk page (and in revert comments), others are discussing and have valid reasons why not to include those other vahanas. Infobox has limited important details, and you can see that it can get crowded and difficult to read. Hope you continue contributing and add content to pages with good sources and can discuss your thoughts in talk discussions, instead of spamming the page with reverts. Asteramellus (talk) 20:43, 20 September 2024 (UTC)