Cyberdog958

User My user page.

Talk Questions? Comments? Advice? Talk to me.

Contributions If I have made a mistake, please tell me.

Dashboard Dashboard

Email Drop me a note, anytime.

Sandbox Please do not edit this page.

Edit Count All my edits.

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

whats your discord

Collapsing obvious sock pleas cyberdog958Talk 02:22, 12 September 2024 (UTC)

whats your discord username i need to educate you C3rej (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 10:12, 11 September 2024 (UTC) @C3rej: I don't respond anywhere except on here and you need to build a consensus before changing the sourced facts. You cannot just say sources are provided just find it in your edit summary while changing quotes of people on the page. The impetus is on you to provide your own sources for the information. cyberdog958Talk 10:19, 11 September 2024 (UTC) Hello, I know you have social medias young blood. I will happily discuss to you with my sources. Thank you, Noah C3rej (talk) 10:23, 11 September 2024 (UTC) Salutations my cyberdog, As it wishes to stand, I must happen to know that the user above, c3rej, may or may not be a member within the Sparta Battalion. I would trust him on any source he states, due to his experience within the Battalion. Although he could be bias, I still find the need to hear both sides of the story before dismissing others. Please consider discussing this with him further, and help make Wikipedia a safer and better place, free of unnecessary hate and misinformation. Thanks, HiandBye2565 HiandBye2565 (talk) 10:28, 11 September 2024 (UTC) Hello cyberdog, please do not say this was vandalism. We would like to discuss our sources C3rej (talk) 11:03, 11 September 2024 (UTC) I can attest. 216.30.155.14 (talk) 18:12, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SoFaygo

Hi, thanks for taking part in the discussion; but can you please sign your comment as it isn't showing at present, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 21:30, 13 September 2024 (UTC)

@Atlantic306: Yes that’s my bad I can’t believe I didn’t notice yet after all these days. I updated it. Thanks for letting me know. cyberdog958^Talk 01:33, 14 September 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Renewable assignments has been accepted

Renewable assignments, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

cyberdog958^Talk 11:27, 17 September 2024 (UTC)

New page reviewer granted

Hi Cyberdog958, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the new page reviewer user right to your account. This means you now have access to the page curation tools and can start patrolling pages from the new pages feed. If you asked for this at requests for permissions, please check back there to see if your access is time-limited or if there are other comments.

This is a good time to re-acquaint yourself with the guidance at Wikipedia:New pages patrol. Before you get started, please take the time to:

• Add Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers to your watchlist to follow NPP-related discussions
• If you use Twinkle, configure it to log your CSDs and PRODs
• If you can read any languages other than English, add yourself to the list of reviewers with language proficiencies

You can find a list of other useful links and tools for patrollers at Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Resources. If you are ever unsure what to do, ask your fellow patrollers or just leave the page for someone else to review – you're not alone! _signed, Rosguill ^talk 16:32, 24 September 2024 (UTC)

Page Curation edit to Hub City Movers

Any specific suggestion regarding what needs verification?

I don't know of any citations that make sense. All of the ones I found are either incorrect, including incorrect quotes from Jimmie, e.g., that we never practiced, or blocked by paywall.

The only one that came close was https://www.google.com/books/edition/Progressive_Country/204WBAAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22Hub+City+Movers%22+-wikipedia&pg=PT13&printsec=frontcover but that mis-attributes Bhagavan to George Vizard.

There's a collection of stuff at https://technologists.com/privatemp3s/HCM/Vulcan%20Gas%20Company%201970/, but I don't see how citing any of that helps. CharlieSauer (talk) 14:58, 25 September 2024 (UTC)

@CharlieSauer: I'm not sure where to find additional sources as I didn't see any obvious ones on first glance. But you reference Discogs a lot which is not a reliable source for info. So anything in the article that is sourced from there isn't verifiable. cyberdog958^Talk 22:58, 25 September 2024 (UTC)

I added cite to 6/28/70 Statesman article. It is accessible to anyone with a U.S. public library account, I think. CharlieSauer (talk) 00:32, 26 September 2024 (UTC)

Added citation to June 25, 1970 Daily Texas article about the record release. Enough? CharlieSauer (talk) 00:34, 26 September 2024 (UTC)

added August 2 Statesman reference. Enough? CharlieSauer (talk) 00:43, 26 September 2024 (UTC)

I think of Discogs as a great source of (verifiable) images of record covers, liner notes, media. However, if Wikipedia considers Discogs unreliable, there was no real need for two of the Discogs references, so I removed them. ok to remove the verifcation message? If not, what more is needed? CharlieSauer (talk) 01:54, 26 September 2024 (UTC)

@CharlieSauer: Yes the new sources you added look fine and the info they are providing looks good. Again, WP:DISCOGS is not considered a reliable source and using the YouTube link of the song is not adding any information. I would probably advise to remove the Discogs references and the YouTube references and you can add them in an external links section at the bottom of the page. But it looks a lot better with those additional references. cyberdog958^Talk 01:54, 26 September 2024 (UTC)

moved YouTubes & Carradine Discogs to Externals. ok now? CharlieSauer (talk) 02:05, 26 September 2024 (UTC)

@CharlieSauer: The body of the article looks good to me. I removed the tag. cyberdog958^Talk 02:09, 26 September 2024 (UTC)

thanks CharlieSauer (talk) 03:17, 26 September 2024 (UTC)

The Signpost: 26 September 2024

• In the media: Courts order Wikipedia to give up names of editors, legal strain anticipated from "online safety laws"

• Community view: Indian courts order Wikipedia to take down name of crime victim, editors strive towards consensus

• Serendipity: A Wikipedian at the 2024 Paralympics

• Opinion: asilvering's RfA debriefing

• News and notes: Are you ready for admin elections?

• Gallery: Are Luddaites defending the English Wikipedia?

• Recent research: Article-writing AI is less "prone to reasoning errors (or hallucinations)" than human Wikipedia editors

• Traffic report: Jump in the line, rock your body in time

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:08, 26 September 2024 (UTC)