September 2024

edit

  Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Little Barford. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments belong on the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and may respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. Panian513 17:56, 7 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at Thomas de la Dale, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Panian513 18:02, 7 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Thomas de la Dale. Panian513 18:04, 7 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

I dont need to lol 94.192.32.22 (talk) 18:05, 7 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
Stop being such a squidward man, live life a bit 94.192.32.22 (talk) 18:06, 7 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Location of Little Barford

edit

I just want to inform you of a couple things regarding the edits that you are doing to the article Little Barford.
First, I will state that I am not an expert in British geography, so my edits may actually be incorrect. Given that, there has been a discussion at User talk:2A02:C7C:6D8A:6A00:CB4:C4C9:ECD6:51D4 that has established that Little Barford is located in Bedfordshire, where it was found that both Google Maps and OpenStreetMaps put this village there.
Second thing that I want to talk to you about is peacefully resolving issues you may have. Instead of commenting on the article itself or in an edit summary where it may get cluttered, my (along with every other user's) user talk page is available for these purposes and I would gladly discuss it there.
QUICKWITTEDHARE CONVERSE 18:09, 7 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

yeah i made one mistake but the mistake you made was little barford wasnt in st neots, it is. Thank you mate. 94.192.32.22 (talk) 18:12, 7 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
you can undo Cambridgeshire, but dont undo st neots plesse 2A02:C7C:6D8A:6A00:3DCD:69A3:8A98:FB02 (talk) 18:15, 7 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
👍 2A02:C7C:6D8A:6A00:3DCD:69A3:8A98:FB02 (talk) 18:18, 7 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

September 2024

edit
 
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Ad Orientem (talk) 20:58, 7 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
ok 94.192.32.22 (talk) 16:49, 17 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
I now shall sit in the darkness and cry, shall I 😂 94.192.32.22 (talk) 16:50, 17 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.
 
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for making personal attacks towards other editors.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Izno (talk) 16:39, 22 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
{{unblock | reason= ill bring back the og ip 94.192.32.22 (talk) 17:21, 22 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.