Isi96

Discretionary sanctions alerts

Invitation to participate in a research

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:28, 23 October 2024 (UTC)

Reminder to participate in Wikipedia research

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.

Take the survey here.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:40, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

Leading Report

I see you described it just as a website. I agree that's the best solution. I apologize for my harshness. --Sobol Sequence (talk) 10:22, 18 November 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

BLP, SPS and OR/inferences from a primary source

[1] the last part of this edit inappropriate and violates WP:BLP Traumnovelle (talk) 20:41, 9 December 2024 (UTC)

@Traumnovelle Like @Ponyo said, you misunderstand what OR means. It was a social media post from his own account. Isi96 (talk) 00:21, 10 December 2024 (UTC)

>All analyses and interpretive or synthetic claims about primary sources must be referenced to a secondary or tertiary source and must not be an original analysis of the primary-source material by Wikipedia editors.

Do praytell how your description of the film doesn't fall under that? Traumnovelle (talk) 06:05, 10 December 2024 (UTC)

@Traumnovelle The film's article describes it as such, with sources. Isi96 (talk) 07:03, 10 December 2024 (UTC)

Sources that weren't even included. Traumnovelle (talk) 07:16, 10 December 2024 (UTC)

@Traumnovelle There was a link to the article. Isi96 (talk) 07:31, 10 December 2024 (UTC)

Since when is that a citation? Traumnovelle (talk) 07:36, 10 December 2024 (UTC)

@Traumnovelle Never said it was, the linked article includes that descriptor and cited sources. Isi96 (talk) 07:44, 10 December 2024 (UTC)