Orphaned non-free image File:Jeon Somi - Fast Forward.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Jeon Somi - Fast Forward.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:23, 19 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Invitation

edit
 
Hello!
I noticed you've made edits to The Weeknd related articles. I thought you may be interested in joining
WikiProject The Weeknd

We are a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to The Weeknd and his discography. If you would be interested in joining feel free to visit the Participants Page!
Thank You. User:Dxneo (talk) 13:23, 1 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

dxneo (talk) 21:40, 25 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

AFK

edit

Hey, I will be traveling next week so I will be away from Wikipedia. I will try to address the ref sections in the GAN review tonight; should we split the section 50/50? Also is GDA really more notable in Korea? I never felt that way as it was perhaps more prestigious 15 years ago than it is now, but I digress. Thanks, ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 01:37, 1 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

As far as I’m aware, the GDA is a very old awards ceremony since the 80s with a long prestigious history, though it may have fallen recently as you say (similar to VMAs), but I do think it is more prestigious than MAMA. And sure, I’m back now so we can split the refs. How exactly should we split it? Flabshoe1 (talk) 13:18, 1 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
Actually I noticed in GAN page that you've handled some of the refs already, much appreciated. I'll finish the rest now. Flabshoe1 (talk) 13:36, 1 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi @Flabshoe1. I called Leehsiao and Andrew318 for explanation at the WikiProject talk page, but no response so far. And suggest that change "Label" to "Distributor" at the "Release history" table. If you’re able to could you leave your opinion on the matter, if possible. 2001:D08:2921:7C9B:17DD:FB77:242D:F840 (talk) 04:20, 1 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

List of South Korean girl groups has an RfC

edit
 

List of South Korean girl groups has an RfC for possible consensus. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂[𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺] 10:30, 11 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi Flabshoe

edit

Hello there, recently the list of best-selling girl groups have been vandalized by an user named "Escmix", the user seemed to have removed your edits as well, they also deleted one of my updates, apparently they're provocating edit warring, i would like to know if there's a way we can stop these users from removing what has already been estabilished by the talk page? They're not respecting the discussions and they are editing as they please to, should we take action? Lightlylove (talk) 22:17, 12 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

If there's a user starting edit wars even after talk page discussions, it should be reported, yes. I don't want to get involved myself but you can look into dispute resolution options. As for your recent change to Twice's total sales, the source says "The tallied figure includes sales of Nayeon’s solo EP, “Im Nayeon,” and Jihyo’s solo full-length album, “Zone.”" and "This includes the sales of the group's all-Japanese sub-unit Misamo's debut album "Masterpiece" (2023)." Solo and subunit sales don't count for a group's sales, so I restored the previous count. Flabshoe1 (talk) 04:44, 14 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
Hello There, the report indicates that Nayeon, Jihyo's and Misamo's sales are counted sure however neither of them 5 sold more than one million copies with their releases, together they don't even add up to 2 million, Twice's source of the 15 million albums sold is from 2022 which means all group releases from 2023 to now haven't been counted even though two of their releases racked up to 1.7 million copies and another million more from their lastest EP, also without counting the physical sales of the single album "Hare Hare" so its still innacurate leaving them at 42M when it has increased, anyway that report may say that it counts all of Twice's solo projects however their information can be wrong and there may be another clearer source out there. Lightlylove (talk) 05:33, 14 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kate Lethbridge-Stewart, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Inverse.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 20:53, 30 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

RE: Kate-Lethbridge Stewart

edit

Thank you for creating Kate Lethbridge-Stewart! I'm honestly surprised we didn't have an article for her yet given... well, everything she's appeared in within the last decade or so. Still, I did want to let you know there are a lot of book sources covering her under both of her names (Both Kate Stewart and Kate Lethbridge Stewart) which may be helpful for expanding the article's overall scope. I'd definitely suggest digging through there and using them to improve the article. I don't have as much time as I'd like to dig through them myself, but I did a partial look through a while ago where you can find a few sources (User:Pokelego999/sandbox/Kate Lethbridge-Stewart). There are many more I didn't get to since that was like, a five-ten minute search a while ago, but I'd highly suggest going through them and using what you can. I'd also suggest a look through Scholar, though I haven't looked through there myself. This isn't me forcing you or anything, but I did want to suggest it since I feel it'd be beneficial in the long term.

Kind regards and happy editing,

Pokelego999 Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 18:35, 2 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

I know right, it's insane that the article didn't exist yet! Especially now with the spin-off announcement, I decided I might as well finally make the article. Thank you so much for the provided sources, I'll take a look at them. It's definitely a good idea to search for books to improve the article's scope. Flabshoe1 (talk) 19:00, 2 August 2024 (UTC)Reply