Favonian
| This is Favonian's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58Auto-archiving period: 7 days  |
 | This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
Automotive Vietnam IP
editThe Vietnam IP editors you've blocked as block evasions in the last few days/weeks who have been interested in unsourced (or vandalistic) edits to automotive articles, I'm wondering if IP 113.160.226.94 and IP 14.241.121.44 are of the same person(s) such as
- 2402:800:63B8:0:0:0:0:0/48
- (Special:Contributions/116.111.185.151 aka user:113.165.167.192, user:117.3.69.213, user:Tsing Yi Epidemic, user:Yishun NCS, user:Galileo Kep1er)
etc. Would you have a look? Thanks, Zinnober9 (talk) 05:08, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
- @Zinnober9: Yes, same person. Both IPs blocked. Favonian (talk) 10:52, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you! Zinnober9 (talk) 14:22, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
Protection of Women in the United States House of Representatives
editThe unregistered user who disrupted the article Women in the United States House of Representatives has been blocked, and I have added hidden text to discourage further disruption. Perhaps you'd like to try to remove the protection from the page to see if that was sufficient to do the trick? --The Mountain of Eden (talk) 18:58, 4 February 2025 (UTC)
- @The Mountain of Eden: Your optimism does you credit, but the recent history of the article contradicts you. In addition to the above mentioned IP, there are 204.137.250.120, 141.222.126.188, 2601:189:8301:5a80:58c2:f7aa:b0d1:ce83 and 2601:189:8301:5a80:9d9c:95c:6ffc:f199, all "focused" on the same person. Hidden texts may work for good-faith editors, but that's not what we are dealing with here, so I'll have to decline your suggestion. Favonian (talk) 19:12, 4 February 2025 (UTC)
- If that's the case, a single month will not suffice, but we'll see what happens when the protection expires. --The Mountain of Eden (talk) 19:22, 4 February 2025 (UTC)
- I suspect that you're right, and if so, WP:CTOPS (two of them) may be brought to bear. Favonian (talk) 19:25, 4 February 2025 (UTC)
- If that's the case, a single month will not suffice, but we'll see what happens when the protection expires. --The Mountain of Eden (talk) 19:22, 4 February 2025 (UTC)
CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 February 5 § Category:Eponymous categories
edit
A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 February 5 § Category:Eponymous categories on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 08:16, 5 February 2025 (UTC)