Wikipedia:Featured list removal candidates/log/January 2016
Contents
Keep
edit- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was removed by SchroCat via FACBot (talk) 23:36, 30 January 2016 (UTC) [1].[reply]
- Notified: Drewcifer3000, WikiProject Music
I am nominating this for featured list removal because it's another 2008 list that doesn't meet current standards. Major issues with sourcing as many of the awards and nominations lack references. Main image needs ALT text. 4 dead links. Ref 2 and the Rolling Stone references are redirects. Cowlibob (talk) 21:27, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist too many unsourced entries, and none of the descriptions even are cited Snuggums (talk / edits) 21:11, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist Awards tally in infobox and lead contradict each other. There are many dead links and most of the awards sections are united. There is also some usage of non-RS websites such as Rock on the Net. Johanna(talk to me!) 17:43, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been removed, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. – SchroCat (talk) 16:05, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was removed by SchroCat via FACBot (talk) 23:35, 30 January 2016 (UTC) [2].[reply]
I am nominating this for featured list removal because it is substantially different from the December 2008 edition that was promoted and hasn't been well-maintained since. It overall has deteriorated in quality and fails to meet current FL standards. The lead is outdated, only going up to 2008. Some of the awards are missing descriptions. There are also many dead links, incorrect uses (as well as absence of) italics within citations, and dubious references such as Gigwise, "Anti Music", and "BlackCelebrityGiving". Snuggums (talk / edits) 20:58, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist. Incomplete and outdated list with number of dead links and some more questionable sources like "live-PR.com", "dirittodautore", "tf1.fr" and "boxxet.com". Yashthepunisher (talk) 18:12, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been removed, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. – SchroCat (talk) 16:05, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was removed by SchroCat via FACBot (talk) 23:35, 30 January 2016 (UTC) [3].[reply]
- Notified: Wikien2009
I don't think I need to specify reasons. It's pretty clear that List of awards and nominations received by 50 Cent does not meet FL criteria anymore. The list was promoted back in 2007. It has a large number of dead links and unsourced content. The lead needs work and expansion to satisfy the FL criterion#1. The number of awards are miscounted in infobox. The tables also do not meet MOS:DTAB. -- Frankie talk 21:28, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist dead links galore, and lead is outdated Snuggums (talk / edits) 20:39, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist Use of non-RS like "Rock on the net", "Billboard Events" and "Chiff.com". Lead is too short and doesn't summarizes the list, every single link is dead except for one. The overall list is not comprehensive enough and needs update. Yashthepunisher (talk) 07:52, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist - Due to severe concerns with references and lead. Spiderone 11:41, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist per above. With a little love, this list could maintain its status, but not in its current form. ---Another Believer (Talk) 22:06, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist for many reasons. The infobox is incomplete and directly contradicts the awards count in the lead, while many awards organizations do not have descriptions or references. The lead is too short and outdated; there are many dead links. I agree with Another Believer that someone could clean this article up if they wanted to, but this is far from FL by this point. Johanna(talk to me!) 17:38, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been removed, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. – SchroCat (talk) 16:05, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was removed by PresN via FACBot (talk) 23:30, 23 January 2016 (UTC) [4].[reply]
- Notified: Gary, WikiProject Business
I am nominating this for featured list removal because of a number of concerns. I feel it's another list promoted in 2008 that doesn't meet current standards. The lead is far too short and does not give a sufficient engaging summary of the list. It also begins with "This is a list of ...", a format we no longer use. The list does not seem to be up to date in terms of figures and there could potentially be organisations that aren't present on the list due to the lack of updates which are both mentioned on the talkpage. The table lacks rowscopes and colscopes so it is not accessible. References show 4 dead links and 1 redirect to main page of the site. Cowlibob (talk) 13:55, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Yeah I can see many of these issues. I cleaned up the table a bit, adding proper wikilinks etc. It seems weird that only american cities are also given states, but no other nation. This is inconsistent as well. Headquarters column really should just include the city. Mattximus (talk) 16:34, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist as outdated, and lead is indeed quite poor Snuggums (talk / edits) 21:14, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delisting- while this nomination hasn't gotten a ton of attention, it hasn't had any work done on it and I agree that it's far from the FL standard. --PresN 02:24, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been removed, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was removed by PresN via FACBot (talk) 23:29, 23 January 2016 (UTC) [5].[reply]
- Notified: Gary, WikiProject Music
I am nominating this for featured list removal because it is another list from 2008 which doesn't meet current standards. The lead is not comprehensive and seems to stop in 2008. Using "Recently..." is not encyclopaedic. Much of the awards are sourced to Rock on the Net which is an unreliable source per WikiProject Music. The MTV Video Music Awards Japan, World Music Awards, and Grammy Awards are all unsourced. The World Music Awards are still pending despite being in 2014. Reference 9 is dead. Ref 6 and 8 are redirects. Cowlibob (talk) 18:51, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- There are far too many passive sentences in the lead as well, making it a difficult read. These would have to be fixed. Mattximus (talk) 16:35, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist very underreferenced and outdated Snuggums (talk / edits) 21:13, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delisting- while this nomination hasn't gotten a ton of attention, it hasn't had any work done on it and I agree that it's far from the FL standard. --PresN 02:24, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been removed, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.