Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Featured log/May 2020

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 00:26, 1 June 2020 (UTC) [1].

---

List of procyonids

Nominator(s): PresN 01:06, 29 February 2020 (UTC)

Fourth in my ongoing series of "animals in a family" (felids, canids, mustelids), we continue through Carnivora with Procyonidea, aka "raccoons". It's the smallest family so far, at 14 species, and doesn't have named subfamilies or tribes, partially because modern research has shown that all prior divisions based on appearance were wrong. The animals are less diverse than other families, generally being 1-2 foot-long forest-dwelling psuedo-omnivores with really long tails, but as the lead image shows they can be pretty cute. The list format is based on the prior lists and reflects FLC comments. As always, thanks for reviewing! --PresN 01:06, 29 February 2020 (UTC)

(I'm getting faster at these (mainly because my script now pulls information directly from Mammal Species of the World, Wikidata, the IUCN, and Animal Diversity Web to generate the tables in the first place), so mustelids isn't promoted yet, but has supports already.)

• By and large would be happy to support this (seems just as high a standard as the previous iterations) but I do have a query about the paragraph of text just before the tables ("The following classification …"). It seems uncited and contains a few assertions which indicate that information may be contested; could this be cited? For example, if there are proposals to reclassify "some island populations of raccoons to full subspecies", perhaps we should be specifying where this proposal has come from. But aside from that I see nothing else to query. Images are all used appropriately, sourcing seems consistent. I haven't spot-checked sources for accuracy but can do so if required. Gʀᴀᴘᴘʟᴇ ^ˣ 11:46, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

• @Grapple X: Easy enough to cite the studies that broke out those species (can also add the IUCN pages as sources too if you think I should); not sure about the last sentence about things not being included- they're instances where there's no strong sources that support the change and MSW3/the IUCN don't support it. I put it in the first list mostly as a reader guide to indicate why some taxonomic change they may have read about somewhere else wasn't included; it is pretty weak, though, and I'm not sure how to cite it as a negative assertion. I'm willing to remove it if you think I should. --PresN 15:06, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

• I wouldn't say you need to cite a negative assertion; there's no need to cite why you have organised the tables or information as you have, but I would at least specify one or more of the proposed classifications that the list specifies that it doesn't abide by--so either "There are several additional proposals which are disputed, such as promoting some island populations of raccoons to full subspecies,[cite one or two of these here] which are not included here", or even "There are several additional proposals which are disputed, such as XYZ's proposal to promote some island populations of raccoons to full subspecies,[cite the specified proposal here] which are not included here" would be sufficient. Gʀᴀᴘᴘʟᴇ ^ˣ 15:13, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

• @Grapple X: Okay, fixed- now lists a specific, cited example of a proposal that is not included. --PresN 16:50, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

• Happy with that. It just avoids the case of saying "these things exist, but I offer no proof of it". I'm happy to support this. Gʀᴀᴘᴘʟᴇ ^ˣ 10:15, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

Drive-by comment

I think there's a copy-paste issue in the last sentence of the Prehistoric procyonids section....... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 12:41, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

Fixed. --PresN 13:43, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

Drive-by comments

In British English we don't use "preys on" with "fruit". But maybe that is normal in US English? If not maybe change to "eats". And "hunting" to "diet".

Consider changing "In addition to the extant genera, Procyonidae comprises 19 extinct genera, though due to ongoing research and discoveries the exact number and categorization is not fixed. Extinct species have also been placed into some extant genera; around 40 extinct Procyonidae species have been found, though due to ongoing research and discoveries the exact number and categorization is not fixed." to something like "As of 2020 around 40 extinct species and 19 extinct genera have been discovered: although some extinct species have been placed in extant genera research is ongoing, so the extinct Procyonidae may be recategorized in future."

P.S. If you have time to do a bit more which might help a smidgen to save the animals from climate change could you point out my mistakes in Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of active coal fired power stations in Turkey/archive1 Chidgk1 (talk) 19:26, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

@Chidgk1: This is the second time someone's commented about the "preys on" (though I think the other time was also you); I've gone ahead and changed it to "eats" and changed the template to say "Diet" instead of "Hunting", to better accommodate non-carnivorous species. I've also changed that sentence to "In addition to the extant species, as of 2020 Procyonidae comprises 40 extinct species placed in both extant and 19 extinct genera, though due to ongoing research and discoveries the exact number and categorization is not fixed." --PresN 16:59, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

Comments

• I would break the sentence beginning "Procyonid habitats are generally forests" into two after "as well"
• I think that's genuinely all I have...... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:24, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

• @ChrisTheDude: Done! --PresN 13:52, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 14:37, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
• Support It's a very good article. I couldn't find anything to pick at. ~ HAL333 20:20, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

Thoughts and source review

• The use of the green Open Access symbol is inconsistent
• I find NGO sources to be questionable at times, but the Centre for Agriculture and Bioscience International looks reasonable to me
• The alt texts need work
• Everything else passes my review.

--Guerillero | Parlez Moi 01:29, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

• @Guerillero: sorry for the delay! Not sure which refs you're referring to to not be consistent with the OA symbol; the cite iucn template adds it by default to iucn refs, and a bot did the others, so I'm not clear on what I need to do- is it just that ref 4 needs a not-OA symbol? Other than that, added alt text to the two images that were missing it; the maps don't have it because they have a caption directly above them instead describing the map. --PresN 02:54, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

• Support passes my review --Guerillero | Parlez Moi 17:31, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

• Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Giants2008 (Talk) 23:07, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 1 June 2020 (UTC) [2].

---

Javier Bardem filmography

Nominator(s): ~ HAL333 18:33, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

I am nominating this for featured list because I believe it provides a comprehensive review of Bardem's impressive work in film. I've worked on the introduction, which also mentions major awards he has won for his work. The article also includes a sortable list and is well cited. ~ HAL333 18:33, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

Resolved comments from ChrisTheDude (talk) 18:20, 13 May 2020 (UTC)

;Comments "garnered him a nomination for the Goya Award for Best Actor." - can't see a source for this "the John Malkovich-directed The Dancer Upstairs and Mondays in the Sun." - ambiguous as to whether Malkovich directed both "He was the first Spanish actor to ever win an Oscar" - the word "ever" is redundant and can be removed "In 2017, He played" - unnecessary capital H "opposite his wife Penélope Cruz" - no need wikilink her again. Also, her name has sprouted a diacritic which it didn't have before. Any film title that starts with The (or El) should sort on the next word Think that's it from me, great work! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 18:56, 11 May 2020 (UTC) Thanks! All of those have been fixed, but I have one question. Should I list the film titles in their original Spanish, or translate it to English, or include both? ~ HAL333 20:44, 11 May 2020 (UTC) I would say that a film should always be shown with the title under which it was released, unless it is universally known under a title in a different language (can't think of any examples of the latter but I am sure they exist.....) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 11:21, 12 May 2020 (UTC) Done. ~ HAL333 16:42, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 18:20, 13 May 2020 (UTC)

Resolved comments from MPJ-DK (talk) 18:20, 13 May 2020 (UTC)

;Review by MPJ-DK As promised, since you did a review of my featured list candidate I will return the favor. His IMDB page lists several TV shows among his credits, but they are not listed here? Is there an exclusion criteria that's keeping them off the list? The titles that are in Spanish only - have they not been released anywhere with an English title? Is that why some have a translation and some don't? More to come, these were just my quick glance observations of the tables. MPJ-DK (talk) 17:23, 12 May 2020 (UTC) MPJ-DK Thanks for pointing out the TV shows bit. I've included all that I could find reliable sources for. Strangely Tv Guide doesn't list any of them; I think some of them are very obscure and he wasn't even credited. I'm currently rewriting the lede to reflect his early TV career. On the Spanish titles, if they received a wide release in English-speaking countries, I gave them the translated English title. But many of his films, particularly his early ones, were only released in Spain.~ HAL333 18:37, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

HAL333 Support, the tables are now as complete as they can get for notable entries, I cannot find a problem with the prose. Great work. MPJ-DK (talk) 19:31, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

Resolved comments from Bloom6132 (talk) 04:31, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

Comments – Need a space between "Cruz" and "In 1993". "The following year he appeared in Días contados (1994) and El detective y la muerte (1994)." and "The following year he starred in the Ridley Scott-directed The Counselor (2013)." Is the year in brackets really necessary for the reader to follow along? If you feel it is needed for consistency (as I observe you only omit the year when it is mentioned earlier, i.e. "That year he also portrayed Pablo Escobar in Loving Pablo"), then feel free to leave it in. Rest of the prose reads well Images utilized are licensed and tagged, with appropriate alt text. When the newspaper already includes the city in its name (e.g. The New York Times, The Washington Post, Los Angeles Times, etc.), it seems redundant to use the location parameter (specifically refs 8, 13, 16, 21, 25, 26, 32, 36–40, 44, 45, 54, and 55) On the other hand, when the location is not mentioned in the paper's title, you could include the city (but it's not strictly necessary). I'm looking at refs 2, 3 and 20. Ref 2 – capitalize the "T" in "The Guardian" —Bloom6132 (talk) 23:51, 16 May 2020 (UTC) Bloom6132 All done. Thanks for pointing out the city parameter - it's something I was hesitant about myself. On the 2nd point, I think I'm going to keep the brackets in. I think there may be a slight precedent to do so (ex. the Featured List Tom Cruise filmography). Thanks again! ~ HAL333 02:30, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

• Support – all comments addressed and explanation for formatting precedent is reasonable. Looks to me like it meets all 6 FL criteria. Great work! —Bloom6132 (talk) 04:31, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

• Note: I am participating in the WikiCup, and intend to claim points from the above review. —Bloom6132 (talk) 01:51, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

Comment - posting this here as I've haven't received a response from the same question I posed at the Naomi Watts filmography FLC. Sorry to throw a spanner in the works, but is there a reason why filmographies have shifted from the film being the first column to the year? Going by the guidelines on MOS:DTT, would it not be more beneficial for visually impaired users to have the film in the row scopes rather than the year? Seeing as that is the more important info, in my eyes anyway, shouldn't they be structured the same way as discographies and accolades list? The guideline I have linked to all has an example table of a filmography that is in the style I mentioned. This seems to have been common practice judging by older nominations, is there a reason why this has changed? NapHit (talk) 19:09, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

NapHit I'll try to answer that. I structured it this way as it is what I saw as the precedent. Note the featured lists Robert Downey Jr. filmography (promoted 2014), Tom Cruise filmography (promoted 2015), List of Amy Adams performances (promoted 2015), Morgan Freeman on screen and stage (promoted 2015), Jennifer Aniston filmography (promoted 2020), Lauren Bacall on screen and stage (promoted 2014), Michael Fassbender filmography (promoted 2016), List of Emma Stone performances (promoted 2017), List of Tom Hanks performances (promoted 2014), etc. Although about half or so featured articles do it the other way, I think it has become an issue of preference. No more than what type of table is used. To me, placing the year before the date just seems intuitive as that is how the list is ultimately organized: chronologically. If titles were the first column, alphabetical organization would seem more appropriate. ~ HAL333 19:53, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for the answer, HAL333. Of those lists you mentioned, Tom Cruise and Amy Adams had the layout I was referring to when they were promoted. I recall the discussion around this when the shift came at FLC, as I was a coordinator back then. From what I recall and what I understand regarding MOS:DTT and WP:ACCESS the reason the film came first was that it was used as the rowscope and this helped readers who were using screen readers. With the year as the rowscope, the row heading is defined as a year rather than the film and this is relayed to the screen reader. Seeing as this is a list about films, in which the films are the primary information and the year is the secondary, it stands to reason that the film should go first, as is the case with discography lists, which are essentially the same thing but for musicians. I've tried to find the discussion where this shift came about but I'm unable to find it. I'm not going to oppose over this because it's a wider issue but I'll leave my comment in case others wish to add their thoughts. I'm also going to leave a note on the talkpage at MOS:DTT to see what users there have to say, if they say it's fine then I'll happily acquiesce. NapHit (talk) 20:36, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

Hi NapHit, Most of the editors follow WP:FILMOGRAPHY. Which shows the year on the left. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 12:46, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

Source review –

• The reliability of the referencing looks fine, and the link-checker tool shows no issues.
• All caps in the titles of refs 4, 5, 8, and 25 should be removed.
• In ref 54, the first word of the publisher (the New York Times) should be capitalized for consistency with the other NYT cites. Giants2008 (Talk) 22:15, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

Giants2008  Done ~ HAL333 05:44, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

• Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Giants2008 (Talk) 23:12, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:26, 30 May 2020 (UTC) [3].

---

Michael Jackson Video Vanguard Award

Nominator(s): Bluesatellite (talk) 04:47, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

I am nominating this for featured list because I believe it meets WP:FL requirements. Bluesatellite (talk) 04:47, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

Resolved comments from ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:55, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

;Comments "Michael Jackson Video Vanguard Award (also known as Video Vanguard Award and Lifetime Achievement Award)" => "The Michael Jackson Video Vanguard Award (also known as the Video Vanguard Award and the Lifetime Achievement Award)" Articles added. "profound impact to" => "profound impact on" (this goes for the infobox too) Preposition changed. "The Beatles and director Richard Lester were the first recipients of Video Vanguard Award at the inaugural VMA for "essentially inventing the music video."[5] At the same night, David Bowie was also the first solo performer to receive the award...." - all of this needs re-writing. Firstly, the Beatles and Lester were not the first recipients of the award, the Beatles, Lester and Bowie were all the first recipients, as they all won the same award at the first awards ceremony. Even if the Beatles and Lester were given their award slightly earlier in the night, it's highly tenuous to list them as the first winners and Bowie as the second given that it happened on literally the same night. It's also pointless to note that Bowie was the first soloist to win, given that he won at the very first ceremony. Sentences rewritten. "who previously had won the 1988 throphy" - trophy is spelt wrong. Also, it would be better worded as "who had previously won" Done " in the MTV's 10th anniversary short film" => " in MTV's 10th anniversary short film" (the channel is not called "the MTV") Done "Guns N' Roses, the 1992 honoree" => "Guns N' Roses, the 1992 honorees" (there is more than one person in Guns N' Roses) Done "Michael Jackson Video Vanguard Award had been presented in eight VMA shows" => "The Michael Jackson Video Vanguard Award had been presented at eight VMA shows" Done "before it was renamed to the Lifetime Achievement Award (2003) for Duran Duran and the Video Vanguard Award (2006) for director Hype Williams." Done "the award was restored with his name in 2011." => "his name was restored to the award in 2011" Done "a documentary about the alleged child sexual abuse by Jackson" => "a documentary about alleged child sexual abuse by Jackson" Done "Since its inception, Video Vanguard Award has been awarded " => "Since its inception, the Video Vanguard Award has been awarded " Done "with most of them being American and British origins" => "with most of them being of American or British origin" Done "nine acts has also won" => "nine acts have also won" Oh God, lol. Done! Any note that just says "Presented by [person]" should not have a full stop, as it isn't a complete sentence. Obviously if there are other sentences after it, you need the full stop. Done Refs against Lester/Beatles are not in correct numerical order Rearranged "Bowie was the first solo performer to receive the honor." - again, pointless to state this, as it was the very first ceremony. Removed "Mulcahy is the director" => "Mulcahy was the director" Done "He was later honored with Video Vanguard Artist of the Decade Award in 1990" => "He was later honored with the Video Vanguard Artist of the Decade Award in 1990" Done "The honor began to be renamed Michael Jackson Video Vanguard Award" => "The honor was renamed Michael Jackson Video Vanguard Award" ("began to be" suggests it was renamed gradually over a long period of time, which isn't true) Done In 2006, you should note the different title, to be consistent with the row above Added "The award was renamed again as Michael Jackson Video Vanguard Award" => "The award was renamed again to the Michael Jackson Video Vanguard Award" Done Refs: For ref 3, the publisher should be Grammy Awards (plural) Ref 7 - do not show title in all caps Same for ref 32 And ref 33 All refs corrected Think that's it from me -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 16:24, 25 April 2020 (UTC) @ChrisTheDude: All issues have been addressed. I really appreciate your input, thank you. Bluesatellite (talk) 01:26, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

Resolved comment from Apoxyomenus (talk) 23:13, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

*Comment: Maybe you can add Taraborrelli' comments about a "background" for the name of this award that reached attention of "reliable sources" like USA Today and this can be a question of WP:NPOV. --Apoxyomenus (talk) 02:51, 11 May 2020 (UTC) @Apoxyomenus: I'm aware that biographer J. Randy Taraborrelli reported that this award naming had something to do with MJ's "jealousy" of Madonna receiving MTV Artist of the Decade award. However, since Taraborrelli is the only source who told this, I'm not really sure whether it warrants inclusion on this article. I'm also afraid of a tiring fan battle between those singers. If you believe it must be included, do you have any suggestion of a neutral prose? Bluesatellite (talk) 10:23, 14 May 2020 (UTC) I pretty understand your concern about a possible "fan battle" (it's a "possibility"), and this is just one of the reasons why we need to avoid sensationalism in writing this part. And as far as I know, Taraborrelli can be used as a source in Wikipedia. Despite beging apparently "the only one" with that claim, certainly, his suggestion received coverage of several contemporary references, e.g USA Today, Washington Post and even, outside English-speaking sources, like this reference from ABC (newspaper) to mention few examples. Also, be advised many of current "commentaries" are just one-point of view. This is other one and possibly, received more support of sources that many of the others. So, i don't know why hide this fact. My 2¢ is something like this: "In his book Michael Jackson: The Magic and the Madness, Taraborrelli suggests the name of this award came of Jackson's idea presented to MTV after Madonna receiving MTV Artist of the Decade award in 1989...[...] (and in case if is necessary): 'His comment received coverage of several references: 1, 2, 3 etc." --Apoxyomenus (talk) 18:36, 14 May 2020 (UTC) Comment. There is consensus that J. Randy Taraborrelli is not a "good" source for the Michael Jackson articles. Editors question some of the controversial claims in Taraborrelli's writings, and conclude that these claims should not be used unless corroborated by other reliable sources.— Akhiljaxxn (talk) 03:38, 15 May 2020 (UTC) ping @Apoxyomenus:... I'm really neutral here. I have no problem with or without that Tarraborelli report. Bluesatellite (talk) 04:46, 15 May 2020 (UTC) @Akhiljaxxn: I see it, seems like in regards to Taraborrelli's biography on Jackson, mostly is a issue about his health disinformation and his public image. I'm ok with that consensus, not problem. However, we can see other authors like Chas Newkey-Burden and his book bringing information about this award without having using Taraborrelli's reference. So he isn't the "only one" with that claim. @Bluesatellite: I understand your "neutral POV" on this and personally, I don't pretend anything except have even more completeness and inclusion in this list with all sides of information. I'm not a judge of the information in this part and I can only make a suggestion since we have references beyond Taraborrelli source, even (for Akhiljaxxn's concern on this). Apoxyomenus (talk) 05:54, 15 May 2020 (UTC) @Apoxyomenus: I've already added one sentence to accommodate your input. What do you think, is it OK now? Bluesatellite (talk) 06:15, 16 May 2020 (UTC) @Bluesatellite: I don't see any problem, hasn't a sensationalist writing style. So it's OK. Apoxyomenus (talk) 23:13, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

• I made a few fixes and am now happy to support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:55, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
• Support- great work!..Akhiljaxxn (talk) 08:22, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
• Support Very well done overall, but it's a shame that we couldn't get a picture of the actual award. I assume they were all copyrighted. ~ HAL333 23:01, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
• Support: Good job, I could not find anything more that requires improvement. --Apoxyomenus (talk) 23:13, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

Resolved comments from User:SNUGGUMS

"outstanding" from "outstanding contributions and profound impact" sounds like puffery Added quotation mark, per source. I'm not convinced nationality of recipients is really relevant here. Either way, let's get rid of the flag icons per WP:Manual_of_Style/Icons#Inappropriate use. Flags removed then. No concerns with File:The Fabs.JPG, File:David Byrne 2006.jpg, File:Michaeljackson (cropped).jpg, File:Bon Jovi 2010.png, File:The Rolling Stones Summerfest in Milwaukee - 2015.jpg, File:Padova REM concert July 22 2003 blue.jpg, File:LL.COOL J. 1999.jpg, File:2005-11-21 U2 @ MSG by ZG.JPG, File:EXIT 2012 Duran Duran (1).jpg, File:Britney HIAM Cleveland.jpg, or File:Missy Elliott 2006.jpg. Good. Perhaps you could swap out File:Richard Lester.jpg for something with a more forward-facing view like File:Richard Lester Bologna 2014.jpg, which also has a known author, plus I somehow can't seem to access the file source right now for what's currently in place (maybe that's just a connection/security issue) Changed to the cropped version of File:Richard Lester Bologna 2014.jpg. While the licensing for File:David-Bowie Chicago 2002-08-08 photoby Adam-Bielawski-cropped.jpg is valid, I'd also aim for a something that gives a clearer view of Bowie's face. Changed to File:David Bowie (1987).jpg. Both file sources for File:Godley & Creme.jpg say "All rights reserved". Unless there's something I've misunderstood, I'm pretty sure that means they're copyrighted and we should opt for other images. Oh wow, the photographer changed the copyright status on Flickr. It was tagged as "cc-by-sa-2.0" in 2014. And according to this: "The CC licenses are irrevocable. This means that once you receive material under a CC license, you will always have the right to use it under those license terms, even if the licensor changes his or her mind and stops distributing under the CC license terms." I will assume good faith that the "own work" claims for File:Madonna's Confessions in Paris 3.jpg, File:Zbigniew Rybczyński.jpg, File:Peter Gabriel-Conspiracy of Hope-by Steven Toole.jpg, File:Wayne Isham nagroda-Award Outstanding Achieverements in the Field of Music Videos. Camerimage 2017 (cropped).jpg, File:Guns n Roses Nottingham 2012.JPG, File:Tom Petty 2016 - Jun 20.jpg. File:Mark Romanek Tokyo Intl Filmfest 2010.jpg, and File:Kanye West at the 2009 Tribeca Film Festival-2.jpg are valid when no evidence suggests otherwise Good Try to find something free for Julien Temple that doesn't have a side-facing view like File:Julien Temple.jpg Sadly, that's the only picture available for free. File:George Michael Symphonica (1).jpg has subpar lighting, and I recommend using another pic Changed to File:George Michael (2011).jpg ?? File:Janet Jackson 10 cropped.jpg seems a bit blurry, or is that just an issue with zooming in? Maybe the cropping could be altered when this doesn't have such visual problems. Changed to File:JanetJacksonUnbreakableTourSanFran2015 (cropped).jpg The file source for File:Beastieboys-sonar07.jpg is giving me a 403 error, and I'd prefer something that doesn't require a login to be accessed Changed to File:Beastie Boys 2009 (6184423405).jpg Either find a replacement URL for File:Rhcp-live-pinkpop05.jpg (I'm getting "page not found"), or use another image in its place I can't think of any better image. Any suggestion?? File:Rhcp-live-pinkpop05.jpg has been reviewed when it was originally uploaded to Wikimedia Commons. And again, the CC licenses are irrevocable, once it's put out for free, it could be used forever. File:Justin Timberlake 2007-2.jpg was clearly edited to remove its background, and I see no good reason not to just replace it with File:Justintimberlake.jpg, which is more faithful to its origin by not getting altered at all aside from cropping to focus on Timberlake's face How about File:JustinTimberlakeJune07 crop.jpg? I got a 404 error when assessing File:Beyonce - Montreal 2013 (3) crop.jpg, so fix the link or get another Beyoncé photo How about this? Another "All rights reserved" issue for File:Rihanna 5, 2012.jpg, plus its file source is plastered repeatedly with the author's name on it. Thankfully there are many free substitutes from commons for Rihanna. Changed to File:Rihanna, 2010, Paris.jpg Sadly, another 404 error for File:P!nk_Live_2013.jpg Changed to this. I don't see File:The opening ceremony of the FIFA World Cup 2014 13 (cropped).jpg in its file source Changed to this. Are no free images available for Russell Mulcahy or Hype Williams? I've tried to search, but sadly nothing's available. There's some work to be done with the media use, which hopefully can get resolved soon. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 16:19, 24 May 2020 (UTC) Thanks for giving time reviewing the article, SNUGGUMS. Let me know if anything else needed to be fixed. Bluesatellite (talk) 02:37, 26 May 2020 (UTC) Definitely looking better. The problem with your Timberlake replacement idea is that its file source links to a 2013 picture of him. As for the Red Hot Chili Peppers, you could use File:Red Hot Slane.jpg. Since your suggestion for Beyoncé sadly is marked as "All rights reserved", let's try something else like perhaps File:Beyonce - The Formation World Tour, at Wembley Stadium in London, England.jpg. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 02:54, 26 May 2020 (UTC) @SNUGGUMS: RHC, Justin, Beyonce changed. Bluesatellite (talk) 03:16, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

This has my support following sufficient improvements. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 03:35, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

• Source review and query – The formatting and reliability of the sources both look okay, and the link-checker tool shows no problems, so the source review is a pass. While I'm here, did they keep Jackson's name in the award title? I remember seeing an ad for the last MTV Music Video Awards that said Missy Elliott was receiving the Video Vanguard Award, which didn't mention Jackson's name, and thought it was possible that they took his name out after the controversies surrounding him gained publicity. Have you seen anything in sources to that effect or am I off base here? Giants2008 (Talk) 23:17, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  • @Giants2008: MTV played it safe, they never made any official confirmation regarding the award naming.[4][5][6] The VMAs website lists it as video vanguard award, but Missy Elliot herself called it "Michael Jackson Video Vanguard Award" in her acceptance speech. Whichever is official, I personally think "Video Vanguard Award" is more common. Bluesatellite (talk) 00:29, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
    • If there's nothing in reliable sources confirming a name change, then I don't think any renaming is necessary for FL status, although I do suggest keeping an eye on sources in the future to see how the title is handled. Giants2008 (Talk) 20:11, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
      • Agreed. Bluesatellite (talk) 22:51, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

Promoting. --PresN 03:12, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

• Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 30 May 2020 (UTC) [7].

---

Community areas in Chicago

Nominator(s): – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 01:01, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

This is a list of, in a way, the "neighborhoods" of Chicago; there were originally 75 of them back in the 1920s but now there are 77. I think this is a nice list that explains its contents well enough and with good enough citations (there used to be more stuff about the "sides", but I couldn't find any non-citogenic sources on the matter). This is my first time at FLC, so please go easy. I understand if this is more appropriate at FAC. Thanks! – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 01:01, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

Resolved comments from ChrisTheDude (talk) 20:12, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

;Comments This is definitely a list so FLC is the right place for it Thanks! "Nevertheless, the areas don't always" => "Nevertheless, the areas do not always" (contractions should always be avoided) "The areas don't necessarily correspond" - same again Both removed, as well as one in the end. "For example, the "Pilsen" and "Back of the Yards" neighborhoods" - don't see any reason for the quote marks round the names Removed "carried a stigma after the publication of The Jungle" - needs expansion, firstly to make clear that The Jungle is a 1906 novel by Upton Sinclair, and secondly to say why it would cause a stigma Added Is "demographics" the correct word to use in the table caption? To me, that would refer to breaking down the population by gender, ethnicity, etc, which isn't detailed here...... Changed to "population and area" Think that's it from me, great work overall! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 11:10, 10 May 2020 (UTC) Thanks! – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 19:46, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 20:12, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
• Support ~ HAL333 22:51, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

Extended content

Comments No need to just embolden "community areas" in the lead. Removed Given that the lead is only summarising five paragraphs of text, the three paragraphs there seems far too much. Trimmed the lead somewhat, merge the last two paragraphs together into one. We also tend to see things like "biggest"/"smallest", "most"/"least populous" in the lead as that's the equivalent of "summarising the table" in the lead. Added a sentence for that near the end of the new first paragraph. University of Chicago Press could be linked. Done " 1920 and 1930 Censuses" Censuses inside the pipe. I've put it as part of the link " changes[1] due" just move that awkward ref to the end of the sentence. Done "Below is a list of the 77 community areas, along with their population, area, and population density." not necessary with the section heading and the table caption. Removed "Chicago Community areas " no need for capital C in community. "2017 Population" no need to capitalise P. Same for the density column. All three done Total row should fix at bottom and not move when sorted. Use class="sortbottom" on the last row delineator (|-). Done It's a bit messy having all those numbers left-aligned. They would be better split into metric/imperial columns and right aligned. Right aligned the population density column. I don't think it's particularly necessary to split the different measurements into different columns. My apprehensions in that respect were because I didn't know |disp=table was a thing in {{Convert}}. I have since separated the columns. – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 23:56, 11 May 2020 (UTC) "(The[11]) Loop" very awkward ref placement. Better off adding a footnote after Loop. Done Refs which are PDFs should have format=pdf in their coding. Done The Rambling Man (Stay indoors, stay safe!!!!) 13:58, 11 May 2020 (UTC) Thanks for your comments! – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 20:11, 11 May 2020 (UTC) @TRM: I've addressed your concerns, just let me know if you have any more. Thanks! – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 06:34, 15 May 2020 (UTC) Hi John, sorry for the delay. The only thing that grates now is that you have different sq mi being converted to the same sq km (e.g. 0.99 and 1.00 sq mi both convert to 2.6 sq km) so I'd consider one more significant figure in those. Also, use the same level of precision throughout for the density so the right alignment is effective. Right now the right hand digit could be hundredths, tenths or units, and that makes the right-alignment nonsensical. The Rambling Man (Stay indoors, stay safe!!!!) 06:38, 15 May 2020 (UTC) Done. (EDIT: Except for the sq mi. population density, which I'll try to see how to do. There we go.) – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 06:45, 15 May 2020 (UTC) Sorry to be a grind, but now it's obvious I should have said the overall population per community column should be right-aligned as well... The Rambling Man (Stay indoors, stay safe!!!!) 06:56, 15 May 2020 (UTC) There's probably a much better way to do it, but done. – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 07:12, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

• Support good work, I added row scopes to the table for fuller compliance with ACCESS, but thanks for all your work and edits above. Cheers. The Rambling Man (Stay indoors, stay safe!!!!) 07:30, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

Source review

• Encyclopedia of Chicago links need access dates
• Everything else checks out

--Guerillero | Parlez Moi 15:21, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Added. – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 16:02, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

• Support --Guerillero | Parlez Moi 01:15, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

Promoting. --PresN 03:12, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

• Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:27, 26 May 2020 (UTC) [8].

---

List of Washington College alumni

Nominator(s): Guerillero | Parlez Moi 06:38, 11 January 2020 (UTC)

I am nominating this for featured list because after much research I think I have listed all of the notable Alumni of Washington College. I modeled the formatting and organization after several existing FLs and I think this lives up to the MOS --Guerillero | Parlez Moi 06:38, 11 January 2020 (UTC)

Resolved comments from ChrisTheDude (talk) 20:06, 30 January 2020 (UTC)

*Comments Some of this may well be down to my (lack of) understanding of the US university system (I am UK-based), in which case I apologise..... ;-) "The college was founded in 1782 by William Smith, but is the successor institution to the earlier Kent County Free School which was founded in 1732" - source?  Done --In actu (Guerillero) Parlez Moi 22:12, 28 January 2020 (UTC) "The college continued to admit subfreshman" => "The college continued to admit subfreshmen"  Done --In actu (Guerillero) Parlez Moi 15:22, 29 January 2020 (UTC) What is a preparatory department? From my understand, it was the faculty that taught students that needed to take remedial classes to be freshmen (subfreshmen). I'm used to colleges having prep schools. I wasn't used to the prep school being treated as another college department before I wrote this article. --In actu (Guerillero) Parlez Moi 15:22, 29 January 2020 (UTC) "Several alumni who were successful writers including" => "Several alumni were successful writers including""  Done --In actu (Guerillero) Parlez Moi 15:22, 29 January 2020 (UTC) "A "†" indicates final year attended" - not sure what this means - does this mean that the person did not graduate? Yes. Should it be something like "A "†" indicates the final year that a non-graduating alumnus attended the college." ? --In actu (Guerillero) Parlez Moi 15:22, 29 January 2020 (UTC) Yes, that would clarify it I think -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:29, 30 January 2020 (UTC)  Done --In actu (Guerillero) Parlez Moi 17:09, 30 January 2020 (UTC) "A "M" indicates a Master's alumni." - "alumni" is plural, so this should be "alumnus"  Done --In actu (Guerillero) Parlez Moi 15:22, 29 January 2020 (UTC) Three of the notes re: symbols have a full stop but the last does not - as they are all complete sentences they should all have one Since it was only for one alumnus, I moved the symbol to a note to clarify an inconstancy in the sourcing --In actu (Guerillero) Parlez Moi 15:22, 29 January 2020 (UTC) What is a class year? The year that someone graduated or left the college. --In actu (Guerillero) Parlez Moi 15:22, 29 January 2020 (UTC) Any chance of a footnote to explain that? Or wikilink the column header to somewhere appropriate? -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:29, 30 January 2020 (UTC)  Done I added a note --In actu (Guerillero) Parlez Moi 17:09, 30 January 2020 (UTC) Any reason that you specify a role which Linda Hamilton played but don't do it for Laura San Giacomo?  Done that was an oversight. --In actu (Guerillero) Parlez Moi 15:22, 29 January 2020 (UTC) "Biochemist that discovered discovered sodium-glucose cotransport" => "Biochemist who discovered sodium-glucose cotransport"  Done --In actu (Guerillero) Parlez Moi 15:22, 29 January 2020 (UTC) Bibliography should go before individual refs Notes, footnotes, then bibliography looks like the standard way of doing this (Gropecunt Lane, Gunpowder Plot, and List of National Defence Academy alumni). Is there a MOS Page that outlines the order? --In actu (Guerillero) Parlez Moi 22:44, 28 January 2020 (UTC) I don't know, but to me it looks odd that you have refs like "Dumschott 1980, pp. 9-10" and then you have to scroll much further down to find out what "Dumschott" actually is...... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:26, 29 January 2020 (UTC) Its the format that I have used for most of the articles that I have worked on (Good Old Mountain Dew, The Bourgeois Blues, Pittsburgh Town, Richard Withers, and Margaret McKenna). --In actu (Guerillero) Parlez Moi 15:22, 29 January 2020 (UTC) Think that's it from me......... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 13:31, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

Resolved comments from ChrisTheDude (talk) 14:33, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

*Comments I forgot to look at the refs earlier...... Inconsistent use of date formats - some are in US format but others in UK format. Ref 10 has both in the same citation. There's also some that look like 2020-1-30. Some refs (eg all the Biographical Directory of the United States Congress ones) have no access date at all. Newspapers (eg Baltimore Sun, Wall St Journal) should be in italics. Ref 71 has a publication date which hasn't been included. Check for consistent formatting and all appropriate fields being completed..... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 20:12, 30 January 2020 (UTC) I did a scrub of the citations, and I think I hit everything. I added an additional non-Washington College citation for Benjamin H. Vandervoort, so now there is a third party citation for everything --Guerillero | Parlez Moi 02:47, 31 January 2020 (UTC) @ChrisTheDude: I took another look at the citations, and I think I fixed the problems --Guerillero | Parlez Moi 04:52, 3 February 2020 (UTC) Ref 26 should have publisher=US Lacrosse rather than website=Hall of Fame Inductees Ref 46 has no publication date or access date Think that's it -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:36, 3 February 2020 (UTC) @ChrisTheDude:  Done --Guerillero | Parlez Moi 01:26, 4 February 2020 (UTC)

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:27, 4 February 2020 (UTC)

Resolved comments from Giants2008 (Talk) 23:12, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

Comments – The hyphens before and after the list of modern college classes in the first paragraph should be en dashes per the MoS. Done --Guerillero | Parlez Moi 02:19, 1 March 2020 (UTC) Does the first word of "State Senators" really need to be capitalized? It doesn't sound like a proper noun in this context. Done --Guerillero | Parlez Moi 02:19, 1 March 2020 (UTC) In the tables, I'd suggest changing the Reference headings to Reference(s) to cover the cases where more than one cite is needed. Done --Guerillero | Parlez Moi 02:19, 1 March 2020 (UTC) Athletics: In the John Howard description, the second word of "Head Coach" probably shouldn't be capitalized. Done --Guerillero | Parlez Moi 02:19, 1 March 2020 (UTC) Law and government: All of the year ranges here need en dashes for style. Done --Guerillero | Parlez Moi 02:19, 1 March 2020 (UTC) Other: The William O. Baker description also needs an en dash for its date range. Done --Guerillero | Parlez Moi 02:19, 1 March 2020 (UTC) For the James A. Adkins description, we do have an Adjutant General of Maryland article if you want to link to it. Done --Guerillero | Parlez Moi 02:19, 1 March 2020 (UTC) Notes b, d, e, f, and g: In this context, the correct phrasing is "first season in MLB", not "in the MLB". Done --Guerillero | Parlez Moi 02:19, 1 March 2020 (UTC) @Giants2008: Do you have a preference between MLB and Major League Baseball for the footnote? --Guerillero | Parlez Moi 02:22, 1 March 2020 (UTC) Upon seeing both of them, I actually prefer the spelled-out version. Giants2008 (Talk) 23:18, 3 March 2020 (UTC) Done --In actu (Guerillero) Parlez Moi 22:07, 4 March 2020 (UTC) You're going to despise me for this one, as changing these is a giant pain in the butt, but given that this is an article about a U.S. college, it should likely be using MDY date formatting in the references, not the international style DMY that is currently being used. Giants2008 (Talk) 00:30, 1 March 2020 (UTC) I prefer to use international dates. I find them to be clearer than the US style. Would you like me to change them. Its going to be painful --Guerillero | Parlez Moi 02:19, 1 March 2020 (UTC) If you really don't want to, I won't be a stickler about it. Please note that I saw the other responses above but haven't reviewed them in detail yet, as I'm feeling a bit under the weather today. Giants2008 (Talk) 23:18, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

• Support – My comments have been satisfactorily addressed. Giants2008 (Talk) 23:12, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

Comments from Medusa

• Add a better short description. Rather than "Wikimedia list article".
  • "Alumni of private liberal arts college in Chestertown, Maryland" --Guerillero | Parlez Moi 14:47, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
• There are two alt for images. One empty and one used, any reason for this?
  • I am using Example text on all of the images. There should only be one alt text. I think the tool is showing the captions --Guerillero | Parlez Moi 14:47, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
• title=Kenneth M. Merz Jr. Named New Editor Of The Journal Of Chemical Information & Modeling → title=Kenneth M. Merz Jr. Named New Editor of the Journal of Chemical Information & Modeling
  • Done --Guerillero | Parlez Moi 14:47, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
• nine [[State senator|state Senators]] → nine [[State senator]]s
  • Done --Guerillero | Parlez Moi 14:47, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
• |website=Washington College |publisher=Washington College → just use the publisher
  • Done --Guerillero | Parlez Moi 14:47, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
• journal=Paris Review|date=1978 → journal=The Paris Review|year=1978
  • year vs date is a personal style issue, not done --Guerillero | Parlez Moi 14:47, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
• subfreshman → sub-freshmen
  • Done --Guerillero | Parlez Moi 14:47, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
• A "M" indicates a Master's alumnus. → An
  • Done --Guerillero | Parlez Moi 14:47, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
• Maryland state Senator → Maryland State Senator
  • Done --Guerillero | Parlez Moi 14:47, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
• New York state Senator → New York State Senator
  • Done --Guerillero | Parlez Moi 14:47, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
• Psychology at University of Bristol → Psychology at the University of Bristol
  • Done --Guerillero | Parlez Moi 14:47, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
• In the ref, there are eg. date=1978 they should be changed to year=
  • I disagree. This is a personal style issue. --Guerillero | Parlez Moi 14:47, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
• In the table there are eg. Writer, and Poet in the Notability section. Can you expand them?
  • None of their books are notable, but they are notable for being a writer
• Consider archiving sources.
  • Is there a script that does that? --Guerillero | Parlez Moi 14:47, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
    • @Guerillero: Yea, use this Tool. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 17:26, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
      • @CAPTAIN MEDUSA: Done --Guerillero | Parlez Moi 17:35, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
• Category:Lists of people by educational affiliation in Maryland|Washington College should be the first category. Than Category:Lists of people by university or college in Maryland .....
  • Done --Guerillero | Parlez Moi 14:47, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

That's it from me. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 13:04, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

I have replied, CAPTAIN MEDUSA --Guerillero | Parlez Moi 14:47, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

• I support this for promotion. I would appreciate your thoughts on Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Ayushmann Khurrana performances/archive1. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 18:24, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

Source review passed, promoting. --PresN 02:39, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

• Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:26, 26 May 2020 (UTC) [9].

---

List of international cricket centuries at Eden Gardens

Nominator(s): Dey subrata (talk) 11:24, 19 March 2020 (UTC)

After working with many other lists and helped some list to become Featured Lists, I improved the article with all required information, citations and structure. I am nominating this for featured list because I believe it meets all of the FL criteria per WP:WIAFL and has a scope of getting FL status. I welcome to all comments and suggestions regarding this nomination. Dey subrata (talk) 11:24, 19 March 2020 (UTC)

Resolved comments from ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 11:25, 27 March 2020 (UTC)

;Comments the main international cricket venue of India → venues of India as well as being a Test, One Day International → as well as Test Till date, 77 Test centuries → To date, 77 scored scored five Test centuries → scored five Test centuries Till date, 13 ODI centuries have been scored → to date No player have scored more than one → No player has scored more Till date, no Twenty20 centuries were scored → to date denotes number of balls faced by → denotes the number Archive sources. fix dashes. That is it from me. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 19:47, 26 March 2020 (UTC) CAPTAIN MEDUSA, fixed all, did not find any dashes issue, if you still find any let me know. Dey subrata (talk) 11:22, 27 March 2020 (UTC)

• Support ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 11:25, 27 March 2020 (UTC)

Resolved comments from ChrisTheDude (talk) 17:07, 28 March 2020 (UTC)

;Comments on the lead "often called as" => "often called the" "as well as Test, One Day International (ODI) and Twenty20 International (T20I) venue" => "as well as a Test, One Day International (ODI) and Twenty20 International (T20I) venue" "the first of these was in January 1934" = "the first of which was in January 1934" "As of 13 November 2014" - that was six years ago, why is the date so old? It was last time an ODI century was scored, changed to 22 Nov.2017, its the last time an ODI was played.Dey subrata (talk) 15:23, 27 March 2020 (UTC) It should say "As of 2020, 30 ODIs have been played at the ground, the most recent on 21 September 2017" because it's not guaranteed that no ODI will ever be played there again -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 15:44, 27 March 2020 (UTC) ChrisTheDude, sounds better to me, fixed. Recent date should be there because "as of 2020" will let the readers perceive as if a test match occured in 2020. In reality Test match is a rare occurence in a venue, occurs after years sometimes 1.5 to 2 years. Similarly ODIs too. Home season comes after 1 year, so expected occurence of a ODI in the same venue is 1 year atleast. Above that, test venues are very rarely used for T20Is. Above that, hardly venues are repeated in a single year as there are more than 20 international venues in India. The recent date actually gives the reader a specific info. Dey subrata (talk) 20:28, 27 March 2020 (UTC) ""as of 2020" will let the readers perceive as if a test match occured in 2020" - not true at all. It simply means that the information is correct as of 2020 -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 21:04, 27 March 2020 (UTC) ChrisTheDude, but just by keeping as of 2020, does not tell you that the last odi was played almost 2.5 years back. I think no harm in giving complete information. And seeing the most recent odi cancelled for the lockdown one can now wait another one year to witness an odi at Eden. I think some dates are important, atleast for this case and this stadium. Dey subrata (talk) 05:23, 28 March 2020 (UTC) On the contrary, when the article says "As of 22 November 2019, the Eden Gardens has hosted 42 Test matches", people will look at that and think "well it's now 2020, so the article is out of date". By all means state separately when the most recent Test was played, but the "as of" date should be the current date -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 14:14, 28 March 2020 (UTC) ChrisTheDude, added this line, The most recent Test match, the first ever day/night Test match in India, was hosted between 22 and 24 November 2019, when India played the visiting Bangladesh team. Is it ok now. Dey subrata (talk) 16:58, 28 March 2020 (UTC) "by Everton Weekes of West Indies" => "by Everton Weekes of the West Indies" " thus became the first Indian" => " thus becoming the first Indian" "to have scored a century at the Eden Gardens" - is *the* Eden Gardens or just Eden Gardens? It should be "the" EG, I think only missed once, corrected. "As of 22 November 2019, the Eden Gardens .." Dey subrata (talk) 15:23, 27 March 2020 (UTC) OK, in that case why is the article title not List of international cricket centuries at the Eden Gardens......? -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 15:40, 27 March 2020 (UTC) ChrisTheDude Undoubtedly... Facepalm what an error ! Moved and fixed. Dey subrata (talk) 20:28, 27 March 2020 (UTC) "The highest individual Test score by any foreign player" => "The highest individual Test score by a player playing against India" (every player is foreign player to someone) correct, not foreign players, teams are not necessarily to play against India only, so should be "overseas player", thats cricketing term used for player who is not native to the country. fixed.Dey subrata (talk) 15:23, 27 March 2020 (UTC) "scored by Rohan Kanhai of West Indies" => "scored by Rohan Kanhai of the West Indies" "five Test centuries each, highest number of Test centuries scored by an individual player at the ground" => "five Test centuries each, the highest number of Test centuries scored by an individual player at the ground" "a total of 7 centuries" => "a total of seven centuries" "The first ODI centuries scored at the ground" => "The first ODI century scored at the ground" "was by the Kris Srikkanth of India " => "was by Kris Srikkanth of India " " The first century scored by a foreign player" - as before "Desmond Haynes of West Indies" - *the* West Indies again "the highest individual ODI score achieved at the ground. This score is also the highest individual score in the ODIs" => "the highest individual ODI score achieved at the ground as well as the highest individual score of all time in ODIs" "The highest individual ODI score by any foreign player" - same again "Two centuries were scored during ICC World Cup in 2011" => "Two centuries were scored during the ICC World Cup in 2011" "7 T20I matches were also played at the ground" => "seven T20I matches have been played at the ground" You also may as well update the "as of" date, as it's still true I think you missed, as already "As of 4 November 2018" is there in the sentence.Dey subrata (talk) 15:23, 27 March 2020 (UTC) I did not miss it, but you have misunderstood what I meant. It should say "As of 2020, seven T20I matches have been played at the ground", because seven have been played there to date. If you really want to clarify that the most recent was in 2018 (although I don't see why you would need to), explain it after the bit about the first -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 15:47, 27 March 2020 (UTC) Fixed accordingly. Dey subrata (talk) 20:28, 27 March 2020 (UTC) "To date, no Twenty20 centuries were scored at the ground" - should be "have been scored". Also, is there a reason you have changed from T20I to Twenty20? Should be T20I.Dey subrata (talk) 15:23, 27 March 2020 (UTC) "Karu Jain of India scored the only Women's One Day Internationals (WODIs) century achieved at the Eden Gardens" "To date, no century was scored" => "To date, no centuries have been scored" I have only looked at the lead so far, I will look at the rest later -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 13:05, 27 March 2020 (UTC) ChrisTheDude, fixed all above. Please check. Dey subrata (talk) 15:23, 27 March 2020 (UTC)

Resolved comments from ChrisTheDude (talk) 18:04, 28 March 2020 (UTC)

;Further comment "(a Test match have a maximum of 4 innings & an ODI match have 2 innings)" => "(a Test match has a maximum of four innings and an ODI match has two innings)" First photo caption: "Sir Everton Weekes was the first batsman who scored a test century at the Eden Gardens, scored 162 runs on 31 December 1948" => "Sir Everton Weekes was the first batsman to score a test century at the Eden Gardens, scoring 162 runs on 31 December 1948" Second photo caption: "Syed Mushtaq Ali was the first Indian to have scored a test century at Eden Gardens, scored 106 in the same test match in which Sir Weekes scored his century." => "Syed Mushtaq Ali was the first Indian to have scored a test century at Eden Gardens, scoring 106 in the same match in which Weekes scored his century." (FYI, "Sir + surname" is never used) Third photo caption: "India's former captain Mohammad Azharuddin scored 5 test centuries at this ground and the first batsman to have achieved this feat." => "India's former captain Mohammad Azharuddin scored four test centuries at this ground and was the first batsman to have achieved this feat." Fourth photo caption: "VVS Laxman of India has the highest individual Test score by any batsman at this ground, with a score of 281, also the second batsman to have scored 5 test century at the ground after Azharuddin." => "VVS Laxman of India has the highest individual Test score by any batsman at this ground, with a score of 281. He was also the second batsman to have scored 5 test century at the ground after Azharuddin." Also, no need to wikilink Azharuddin again in this caption. The "as of date" at the top of each table should be 2020 Why are the "as of" bits half in italic and half not In all of the "as of" bits, "were scored" should be "have been scored" Fifth photo caption: "Kris Srikkanth is the first ever player to have scored an ODI century at the Eden Gardens." => "Kris Srikkanth was the first ever player to score an ODI century at the Eden Gardens." WODI header: "As of 19 March 2020, only one century was scored in the Women's One Day Internationals (WODIs), played at the ground" => "As of 2020, one Women's One Day International (WODI) has been scored at the ground" Ref 4 has no work/publisher listed All the best -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 17:16, 28 March 2020 (UTC) ChrisTheDude, fixed all above.Dey subrata (talk) 17:45, 28 March 2020 (UTC)

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 18:04, 28 March 2020 (UTC)

Comments from Harrias

• "..as well as a Test.." To prevent this seeming like a run on from the previous statement clarify: "..as well as being a Test.."
• Consider being more vague in some of the statistics that aren't too important, to prevent it continually having to be updated: "has hosted 42 Test matches" could be "has hosted more than 40 Test matches", remove the detail about the most recent matches altogether.

Removed the most recent from all formats, but for Test, made a little tweak seeing the the most recent match is the first ever day/night Test match of India, so kept accordingly. Dey subrata (talk) 13:29, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

• "The first century scored by an overseas player was on 1 November 1981.." It was in 1989.
• "Ryan ten Doeschate of Netherlands scored.." "of the Netherlands".
• "the 1st and 2nd innings" Is this necessary? If it is, at least change it to "first and second".
• "denotes the number of balls faced by the player to score the particular score" This is a bit clunky, just trim it to "denotes the number of balls faced by the player"
• "refers to the date the test match started." Capitalise "Test match". No full-stop needed.
• "refers to whether the player's team won lost or if the match was drawn." No full-stop needed.
• As, per MOS:ACCESS, "By default, most screen readers do not indicate presentational text attributes (bold, italic, underline)", do not use these as the primary indicator of something: ideally replace them with an accessible symbol, such as {{dagger}} or {{double-dagger}}.
• Consider using {{NA}} in replace of "NR".
• File:Everton Weekes.jpg needs a US PD tag.
• File:Mushtaq Ali 1936.jpg needs a US PD tag.
• Remove the 110% font size from the ODI table.
• Per MOS:ACCESS, do not use colour as the primary indicator of something: ideally replace them with an accessible symbol, such as {{dagger}} or {{double-dagger}}.

That's all from me at the moment. I will claim points for this review in the WikiCup. Harrias ^talk 11:02, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

Harrias, fixed all above. Please comment if anything else. Dey subrata (talk) 13:29, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

Hello Harrias, waiting for your further comments. Dey subrata (talk) 05:20, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

Hello Harrias, kindly put your comment, so that the process can be moved further, I've other lists to nominate. It will be helpful if you make your comment as soon as possible. Thank you. Dey subrata (talk) 17:10, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

• Support apologies: all my concerns have been dealt with, and I'm happy to support this. Harrias ^talk 21:02, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

Resolved comments from Giants2008 (Talk) 20:37, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

Comments – "These include the first ever day/night Test match in India, was hosted between 22 and 24 November 2019". For this to work grammatically, it needs "which" before "was". Keys, In the Result description, a comma would be helpful after won (before the connected refs). VVS Laxman photo caption: "He was also the second batsman to have scored five Test century at the ground...". "century" should be "centuries" here. Giants2008 (Talk) 20:47, 6 May 2020 (UTC) Giants2008, fixed all above. Dey subrata (talk) 21:12, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

• Support – My concerns have been addressed. Giants2008 (Talk) 20:37, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

• Source review – The reliability and formatting of the references both look okay, and the link-checker tool shows no issues. I'd call the source review a pass. Giants2008 (Talk) 22:26, 9 May 2020 (UTC)

• Support Passes my review --Guerillero | Parlez Moi 16:20, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

Giants2008, it has been 12 days since the source review done, meanwhile another reviewer too reviewed. Can it be promoted now. Drat8sub (talk) 17:14, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

Promoting. --PresN 02:39, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

• Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:26, 26 May 2020 (UTC) [10].

---

List of Hot Country Singles number ones of 1969

Nominator(s): ChrisTheDude (talk) 18:07, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

With 43 of these lists now promoted to FL status and one having multiple supports which will complete the 1970s, it's time to start on the 1960s, a far superior decade for country music in my humble opinion...... ;-) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 18:07, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

These aren't so much errors, but my personal preference

• Hot Country Singles, in 52 issues of the magazine - I would insert weekly after 52, it makes a little more clear
• In the issue of Billboard dated January 4 - I would reword it as "the January 4 issue", it's a little awkward
• which spent five weeks at number one, and his total of eleven weeks atop the chart in 1969 was the highest by any artist - I would split that sentence in two separate sentences
• his total of eleven weeks atop the chart in 1969 was the highest by any artist - You should clarify that. Was it the highest in 1969 or in the history of the chart? I would also say "cumulative" rather than total
• All three of James's chart-toppers - just James' per [11]
• If you wanted to expand the lede you could mention Tammy Wynette and Conway Twitty, as they both had two #1's that year.
• I hope those were helpful. It's a good article overall. ~ HAL333 00:35, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Thanks for your comments, I have acted upon them. I haven't changed the bit about "issue dated January 4", as it almost certainly didn't actually physically come out on that date, and I think saying "issue dated January 4" is less ambiguous. Hope that's OK....... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:29, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
    • Yeah, the January 4 thing makes sense now.
• Support Well done. ~ HAL333 15:28, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
• Support ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 11:08, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
• Support --Guerillero | Parlez Moi 13:13, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

Source review passed, promoting. --PresN 02:39, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

• Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 26 May 2020 (UTC) [12].

---

List of Bandai Namco video game franchises

Nominator(s): Namcokid47 ^(Contribs) 21:29, 25 December 2019 (UTC)

This is the third time I have decided to nominate this for FLC. This is a comprehensive list of all video game franchises created by Bandai Namco Holdings and its subsidiaries, including Banpresto and B.B. Studio, alongside those from both Namco and Bandai created prior to the merge. All entries contain references from reliable sources that prove it is a series, all of which meet WP:V. This list has been a personal project of mine that I have worked hard on improving and fixing, and I hope to see this finally become a Featured List. Namcokid47 ^(Contribs) 21:29, 25 December 2019 (UTC)

Comments from Spy-cicle

Third time's the charm, let's take a look:

• The first reference is to Bandai Namco Entertainment's coporate history yet the first sentence is about Bandai Namco Holdings. This is quite confusing.
  • Replaced source. Namcokid47 ^(Contribs) 00:47, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
    • Confirmed.  Spy-cicle💥  ^Talk? 16:13, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
• In references the website parameter should be filled as well as the publisher parameter. E.g. for website=Eurogamer the publisher=Gamer Network. A useful list is on WP:VG/RS.
  • Done.  Spy-cicle💥  ^Talk? 16:13, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
• "As of 2017, Bandai Namco was the largest toy company by revenue in the world" Statista source states 2018.
  • Corrected. Namcokid47 ^(Contribs) 00:47, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
    • The Newzoo source here needs to have a more recently archived version. This is becuase the ranking used in the archived source from 2017 differs from the 2019 ranking.  Spy-cicle💥  ^Talk? 16:13, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
      • • Fixed. Namcokid47 ^(Contribs) 16:49, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
    • Confirmed.  Spy-cicle💥  ^Talk? 13:05, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
• "as well as the third-largest video game company..." I think the "as well as" is redundant here since you are using a list.
  • Corrected. Namcokid47^(Contribs) 00:47, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
    • Confirmed.  Spy-cicle💥  ^Talk? 16:13, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
• "Bandai Namco owns former developer Banpresto, which operates as a toy company in Japan and was purchased in 2008," ,In the source it states Namco Bandai Holdings made Banpresto a wholly owned subsidiary in June 2006 hence it was purchased in 2006 not 2008.
  • Bandai Namco purchased Banpresto in 2006, and merged their video game operations with theirs in 2008. Fixed. Namcokid47 ^(Contribs) 00:47, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
    • Confirmed.  Spy-cicle💥  ^Talk? 16:13, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
• "The company retains the rights to defunct developer BEC" Could you be more specific here? Do you mean BEC's video game intellectual property? If so it may be worth stating for clarity.
  • Clarified, they own the video game assets of BEC. Namcokid47 ^(Contribs) 00:47, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
    • Confirmed.  Spy-cicle💥  ^Talk? 16:13, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
• " Licensed IP" I do not see why the acronym is since Intellectual property (IP) was not introduced in the lede.
  • Not sure what you mean here...? Namcokid47 ^(Contribs) 00:47, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
    • I was confused as to why "IP" was used over "Intellectual property" in the key for the table. Although this has already been addressed by Dissident93 when he changed "Licensed IP" to "Note: Fields highlighted in yellow are licensed intellectual properties"  Spy-cicle💥  ^Talk? 19:42, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
      • Yeah, we shouldn't be using abbreviations unless we've used the full word at least once prior. ~ Dissident93 ^(talk) 20:41, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

I have not managed to look at the table yet.  Spy-cicle💥  ^Talk? 23:53, 25 December 2019 (UTC)

• Spy-cicle I've corrected all errors you have brought up so far. Namcokid47 ^(Contribs) 02:04, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
  • @Namcokid47: Just to remind you there are still some outstanding issues below.  Spy-cicle💥  ^Talk? 19:47, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
    • @Spy-cicle: Not sure what you mean here. The Statista source does show the revenue of the company. Namcokid47 ^(Contribs) 01:07, 12 February 2020 (UTC)

      @Namcokid47: My concern was that the archived Statista source not display the infomation regarding the revenue of the company instead showing a pop-up for a subscription. However, I did not see that there was a paragraph of prose which was not covered by a pop-up. Although, there is still a small issue with this archived source as it is not the most up to date infomation on the revenue of the company as it is displaying 2017 infomation as opposed to the 2018 infomation currently being linked. This needs to be fixed as is states "As of 2019".  Spy-cicle💥  ^Talk? 18:51, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

  • Okay it seems you have fixed all the issues addressed so far in the lede however I have found something else. Currently the archived Statista source does not display the infomation regarding the revenue of the company.  Spy-cicle💥  ^Talk? 18:29, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
  • Additionally the references in Japanese need to have the following parameters filled out: trans-title, trans-website (if applicable), language.  Spy-cicle💥  ^Talk? 17:58, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
  • @Namcokid47: Are you going to the above two issues?  Spy-cicle💥  ^Talk? 22:53, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
    • I already did. Namcokid47 ^(Contribs) 23:37, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
      • The language parameter and Statista archived source still need to be addressed.  Spy-cicle💥  ^Talk? 20:13, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
        • @Spy-cicle: - The Statista source actually does display the revenue of the company: "In 2018, Namco Bandai had the highest annual revenue of the selected toy companies, generating revenues of 6.6 billion U.S. dollars." I have also added the trans-title parameter to all Japanese refs. Namcokid47 ^(Contribs) 17:37, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
        • @Spy-cicle: - Hate to ping you again, but are you planning on commenting? I've covered the two issues you brought up. Namcokid47 ^(Contribs) 21:09, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

          Sorry this slipped my mind. Support Regards  Spy-cicle💥  ^Talk? 16:22, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

Resolved comments from ChrisTheDude (talk) 20:03, 6 February 2020 (UTC)

;Comments from ChrisTheDude Drive-by comment - Cells highlighted in yellow also need a symbol, as colour alone cannot be used per MOS:ACCESS -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 21:39, 8 January 2020 (UTC) Further comments "The core video game branch of the company is Bandai Namco Entertainment [...] and continues to develop games for home console" - doesn't make grammatical sense. The "and" should probably be "which" "defunct developer BEC, who merged" => which merged .hack is initially listed under H, but when that column is re-sorted it jumps to the top - need to use a sort template to ensure it stays under H (same applies to the first/last release columns) Think that's it from me -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 20:06, 10 January 2020 (UTC) Resolved these issues. Namcokid47 (Contribs) 16:43, 15 January 2020 (UTC) .hack still sorts at the top in the first/last release columns. Also I just noticed that in the refs Statista is spelt incorrectly -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:37, 16 January 2020 (UTC) @Namcokid47: - any plans to fix the above? -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:31, 5 February 2020 (UTC) Sorry, I've been busy with other stuff. I'll get to fixing these right away. Namcokid47 (Contribs) 15:21, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 20:03, 6 February 2020 (UTC)

Comments –

• "while Tekken is its best selling franchise, selling over 40 million copies across multiple platforms." Having "selling" twice in three words isn't the best writing possible; how about "with sales of over 40 million copies" instead?
• "and is also the third-largest video game company in Japan...". The "also" is redundant here and can be removed to make the sentence tighter without affecting its meaning.
• I've never been a fan of "List of" section headings, as it's obvious from the title that this is a list. "Franchises" would work just as well as a title.
• I haven't checked the references in detail, but ref 47 has all caps ("GOD EATER") that should be removed. Giants2008 (Talk) 01:27, 16 February 2020 (UTC)

• The article passes my source review. I do wonder if the lead needs to be a bit longer, but I don't really know what it is missing. It is probably alright --Guerillero | Parlez Moi 04:22, 6 March 2020 (UTC
• The company owns the video game assets - I would insert "also" before owns. Otherwise everything looks great, the lede svg is very aesthetically appealing. ~ HAL333 00:52, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
  • @HAL333: - Done. Namcokid47 ^(Contribs) 01:19, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
• Support ~ HAL333 01:21, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

Promoting. --PresN 02:39, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

• Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 00:27, 25 May 2020 (UTC) [13].

---

List of Under-19 Cricket World Cup centuries

Nominator(s): Bharatiya29 12:15, 11 February 2020 (UTC)

I am nominating this for featured list because I think that it has the quality expected from an FL. Bharatiya29 12:15, 11 February 2020 (UTC)

Resolved comments from ChrisTheDude (talk) 12:37, 16 March 2020 (UTC)

;Comments Photo caption: "India's Shikhar Dhawan has scored" => "India's Shikhar Dhawan scored" "have scored the most number of centuries" => "have scored the highest number of centuries" "most number of centurions" => "highest number of centurions" "18 teams have had at least one century scored for them" => "players from 18 teams have acored at least one century" "26 of the participating teams" - don't start a sentence with a number, so need to find a way to reword this "The highest number of centuries were scored" => "The highest number of centuries was scored" (the subject is "number", which is singular) " the lowest number of centuries were scored" - as above "in 1988, 2000, and 2008 editions" => "in the 1988, 2000, and 2008 editions" "The highest number of centuries at a single ground have been scored" => "The highest number of centuries at a single ground has been scored" "Williams' 108 runs against Pakistan at the 1988 edition final" => "Williams' 108 runs against Pakistan in the 1988 final" Why is there quite a bit of missing data on 4s, 6s, etc? Is this info simply not recorded? Cricinfo does not have complete data for some matches. Don't know about CricketArchive. Will appreciate if someone with the subscription can check. Bharatiya29 17:51, 13 February 2020 (UTC) @Bharatiya29: Did you manage to find anything.........? -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:37, 27 February 2020 (UTC) It looks like even CricketArchive does not have the complete data for these matches. Bharatiya29 12:47, 27 February 2020 (UTC) I guess if the info isn't available there's not much you can do....... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:25, 3 March 2020 (UTC) "The 13 teams that have not got a century scored for them" => "The 13 teams for which no player has scored a century scored" HTH -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 14:58, 13 February 2020 (UTC) Done. Thanks for your detailed review. Bharatiya29 17:51, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:25, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

Comments from Harrias

• "..and is held once in every two years.." Remove "in".

  Fixed. The Rambling Man (Stay indoors, stay safe!!!!) 12:55, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

• "As of the 2020 edition, a total of 130 centuries have been scored by 115 players from 18 different teams." and then "Out of the 31 teams that have participated in the championship, players from 18 teams have scored at least one century." We don't need this fact repeated twice.

  Fixed. The Rambling Man (Stay indoors, stay safe!!!!) 12:55, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

• Use {{asterisk}} instead of *.

  Done. The Rambling Man (Stay indoors, stay safe!!!!) 12:55, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

• Ref #2 needs an endash, rather than a hyphen in the title. Also, replace "news18.com" with CNN-News18.

  Fixed. The Rambling Man (Stay indoors, stay safe!!!!) 12:55, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

• That aside, the references are all to reliable sources, and are formatted in an appropriate, consistent style.
• That's a pretty rubbish picture of Dhawan, isn't there a higher quality image we could use instead?

  Doesn't appear to be. The Rambling Man (Stay indoors, stay safe!!!!) 12:55, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

Overall, not much wrong with this one, nice work. Harrias ^talk 12:35, 25 March 2020 (UTC)

• Harrias I've addressed your concerns here. The Rambling Man (Stay indoors, stay safe!!!!) 12:55, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

• @FLC director and delegates: The nominator has been ArbcomBlocked. Can this be archived? The objections aren't going to get fixed --Guerillero | Parlez Moi 18:37, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

  This could easily be a list that someone like Harrias could adopt and take to its conclusion. I wouldn't object to that, especially given the decent quality of the list at this point. The Rambling Man (Stay indoors, stay safe!!!!) 18:42, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

  I'll take a look tomorrow, but given my review, I concur that it should be relatively straightforward. Harrias ^talk 19:18, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

  Well I'm also happy to help and take over as co-nom with you Harrias. The Rambling Man (Stay indoors, stay safe!!!!) 20:02, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

Harrias are your concerns here resolved? The Rambling Man (Stay indoors, stay safe!!!!) 07:36, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

• Support Yeah, I'm happy with this now. (Will claim point in WikiCup etc. etc.) Harrias ^talk 08:43, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

Thoughts

• Cricket For Dummies needs a location

  Why, it's a book? The Rambling Man (Stay indoors, stay safe!!!!) 14:00, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

• ESPNcricinfo is inconstantly linked

  Fixed. The Rambling Man (Stay indoors, stay safe!!!!) 14:00, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

• Everything else checks out

--Guerillero | Parlez Moi 13:54, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

Guerillero cheers. The Rambling Man (Stay indoors, stay safe!!!!) 14:00, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

• Support --Guerillero | Parlez Moi 14:05, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

• Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Giants2008 (Talk) 22:08, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 00:27, 25 May 2020 (UTC) [14].

---

List of Roman Catholic archbishops of Vancouver

Nominator(s): Bloom6132 (talk) 20:20, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

I am nominating this for featured list because I feel its structure and formatting mirrors the other lists I have successfully nominated to FL (particularly List of Roman Catholic bishops of Hong Kong, which is close to promotion), and it now meets all 6 FL criteria. This is the second time this list has been nominated for FL, but first one under this particular article title. —Bloom6132 (talk) 20:20, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

• Support - I genuinely couldn't find anything to pick up on -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 11:53, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
• Support The only thing I thought I might bring up is the inconsistency in the notes section: Is there a reason the death dates aren't listed for everyone? - Aza24 (talk) 00:41, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

• @Aza24: The first rows of Durieu and Dontenwill in the tables omit their death date (along with the info pertaining to their later roles of Bishop and Archbishop, respectively) because that is already covered in the later rows. I don't want to repeat the same info twice. And Exner is still living. —Bloom6132 (talk) 01:30, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

Source review

• Relisting RCAV.org seems unnecessary

• Agreed – removed all. —Bloom6132 (talk) 02:26, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

• Individual parish websites tend to be suspect. (Holy Rosary Cathedral and St Anne's) Can you find a better source?

• I've removed the St. Ann's source (leaving it still referenced with McNally's book published by the University of Alberta Press). Going to look for one to replace the Cathedral source. —Bloom6132 (talk) 02:26, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
• Replaced the Cathedral source with one from the Catholic Encyclopedia on New Advent. —Bloom6132 (talk) 10:38, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

• I'm not a fan of using press releases from the archdiocese. Is there a better source?

• Replaced with press release from the Canadian Conference of Catholic Bishops. Hope that works. If not, there's also a Vancouver Sun article (but it cites the archdiocese's press release). —Bloom6132 (talk) 02:26, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

--Guerillero | Parlez Moi 01:44, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

@Guerillero: thanks very much for the review! I hope I've addressed your comments satisfactory manner. —Bloom6132 (talk) 10:38, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

@Bloom6132: I would rather the Vancouver Sun. Someone else's hands touched it and maybe did some fact checking. Everything else looks good to me --Guerillero | Parlez Moi 15:35, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

@Guerillero: I've added the Vancouver Sun article in addition to the CCCB source. I had trouble getting the article to display on Firefox, but still managed to get it archived. And one extra ref won't hurt. —Bloom6132 (talk) 18:34, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

• Support --Guerillero | Parlez Moi 18:47, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

• Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Giants2008 (Talk) 22:12, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 00:26, 25 May 2020 (UTC) [15].

---

List of Presidents of Washington College

Nominator(s): Guerillero | Parlez Moi 01:51, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

After reviewing a number of FLCs, I feel that it is close to fulfilling the criteria. As a heads up, the article will be on the front page as a DYK in the next week, looking at the queue. --Guerillero | Parlez Moi 01:51, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

Resolved comments from ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 19:38, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

; Comments from Medusa Why are the Principal and President in bold I bolded them because of the standard of bolding the title in the first usage in the leade. I removed them for now. --Guerillero | Parlez Moi 19:01, 5 May 2020 (UTC) Sort categories alphabetically Which categories? --Guerillero | Parlez Moi 19:01, 5 May 2020 (UTC) Add alt text for images Done --Guerillero | Parlez Moi 19:34, 5 May 2020 (UTC) External Link → External links Done --Guerillero | Parlez Moi 19:01, 5 May 2020 (UTC) Citation number 3. Change the website=Washington College to publisher=Washington College Done --Guerillero | Parlez Moi 19:01, 5 May 2020 (UTC) Consider archiving sources. Add a short description The title of the page should be List of presidents of Washington College. Some examples List of presidents of the United States, List of presidents of Brigham Young University–Idaho, List of presidents of Louisiana Tech University etc. Done Principals and Presidents of Washington College → Principals and presidents of Washington College Done --Guerillero | Parlez Moi 19:07, 5 May 2020 (UTC) the Principal of the college; subsequently, the executive officer is the President. → principal and president Done --Guerillero | Parlez Moi 19:07, 5 May 2020 (UTC) President of Washington College → lowercase "p" Done --Guerillero | Parlez Moi 19:07, 5 May 2020 (UTC) Current Officeholder → Current officeholder Done --Guerillero | Parlez Moi 19:07, 5 May 2020 (UTC) In the table why are there two breaks tags. <br>. Just use one. Done --Guerillero | Parlez Moi 19:07, 5 May 2020 (UTC) {{Abbr|Ref.(s)|Reference(s)}} → {{Abbr|Ref(s)|Reference(s)}} Done --Guerillero | Parlez Moi 19:01, 5 May 2020 (UTC) Previous Experience →Previous experience Done --Guerillero | Parlez Moi 19:01, 5 May 2020 (UTC) Former CEO of DuPont → no need to link CEO Done --Guerillero | Parlez Moi 19:01, 5 May 2020 (UTC) In the infobox the President should be Presidents The post is the "president of Washington College" not the "presidents of Washington College" --Guerillero | Parlez Moi 19:01, 5 May 2020 (UTC) date=6 December 2008|website=Washington College|pages=12-13|url-status=live → pages=12–13 I added the dash, but I don't want to remove the website name or the date --Guerillero | Parlez Moi 19:01, 5 May 2020 (UTC) wikitable sortable → wikitable plainrowheaders sortable. I think plainrowheaders looks better. I can't tell the difference --Guerillero | Parlez Moi 19:01, 5 May 2020 (UTC) That's it from me. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 18:39, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

• I support this for promotion. I would appreciate your thoughts on Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of awards and nominations received by Scarlett Johansson/archive1. Thanks. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 19:38, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

Resolved comments from ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:56, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

;Comments "negotiates a contract independent with the board" - this doesn't seem to make grammatical sense. Do you mean "independently"? Yes, fixed --Guerillero | Parlez Moi 01:44, 10 May 2020 (UTC) "Four of them have been interim presidents." - extremely short sentence. I would merge it onto the previous one as "four of whom......" Done --Guerillero | Parlez Moi 01:44, 10 May 2020 (UTC) "A singular president was working in the private sector before their term" - as this refers to one specific woman, I don't see the need for gender neutral language, so I would just say "her term" (I presume this refers to Bair) Also "single" would be more apt than "singular" fixed --Guerillero | Parlez Moi 01:44, 10 May 2020 (UTC) "Most of the rest of the presidents" => "Most of the remaining presidents" done --Guerillero | Parlez Moi 01:44, 10 May 2020 (UTC) Once the table is sorted on any other column, it's impossible to re-sort it into number order. I suggest using hidden sorting templates to make the dashes sort as, say , 2.5, etc. done --Guerillero | Parlez Moi 01:44, 10 May 2020 (UTC) Is nothing known about Stack and Clark's previous experience? done --Guerillero | Parlez Moi 01:44, 10 May 2020 (UTC) On Cater's row, "vice" is spelt wrong done --Guerillero | Parlez Moi 01:44, 10 May 2020 (UTC) "But, Dumschott (1980) and primary documents from the era refer to him as the first principal." => "Dumschott (1980) and primary documents from the era, however, refer to him as the first principal." done --Guerillero | Parlez Moi 01:44, 10 May 2020 (UTC) Note c is a complete sentence so needs a full stop. done --Guerillero | Parlez Moi 01:44, 10 May 2020 (UTC) "Gerard E. Stack is referred to as an Interim President by Watts (1894), Dumschott (1980), and Thompson (2000); however, the college's website" => "Gerard E. Stack is referred to as an Interim President by Watts (1894), Dumschott (1980), and Thompson (2000), however the college's website...." done --Guerillero | Parlez Moi 01:44, 10 May 2020 (UTC) Think that's it from me..... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:18, 9 May 2020 (UTC) Can you take another look ChrisTheDude --Guerillero | Parlez Moi 01:44, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:56, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
• I feel like the first image should be cropped. It's strange when all of them except that one have the same width. ~ HAL333 00:19, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Done --Guerillero | Parlez Moi 15:10, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
• Support ~ HAL333 15:33, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
• Source review – The reliability and formatting of the sources look okay, and the link-checker tool shows no problems. The sourcing checks out overall. Giants2008 (Talk) 22:19, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

• Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Giants2008 (Talk) 22:28, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 00:26, 25 May 2020 (UTC) [16].

---

List of Hot Country Singles number ones of 1979

Nominator(s): ChrisTheDude (talk) 12:00, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

Continuing my little number-one country songs project, which has thus far produced 43 FLs. So here's the potential #44, covering a year in which the Bellamy Brothers topped the chart with one of the worst-titled songs ever (IMO) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 12:00, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

• Support – didn't spot any outstanding issues. Read the prose in detail – looks all good. Images utilized are licensed and tagged, with appropriate alt text. And all the URLs are working. Looks to me like it meets all 6 FL criteria. Great work! —Bloom6132 (talk) 13:44, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
• Comments Support from Hog Farm.
  • Worldcat suggests that the Kingsbury book with that ISBN was published in 1998, not 2004. Might want to check the edition.
    • It's based on this Google Books listing (I don't physically own the book) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 20:11, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Can we get publisher locations for the two books?
    • One was published by Oxford University Press - is it really necessary to say they are based in Oxford? Other one added..... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 20:11, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
  • That's all I have on this one. Hog Farm (talk) 19:41, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
• @Hog Farm: - responses above -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 20:11, 2 May 2020 (UTC)

COmments by MPJ

• I am surprised to see a whole paragraph in an FLC being unsourced?
• More to come. MPJ-DK (talk) 05:03, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Para 2 doesn't need specific sourcing because it only summarises content from the table. This has never been an issue before...... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:29, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
    • I have never personally seen that before, but if it hasn't stopped FLs from passing in the past then I'm good with the precident set.MPJ-DK (talk) 13:00, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
      • See List of Hot Country Singles & Tracks number ones of 1991, where similar content is not explicitly sourced in the lead -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 13:10, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
• Text wise all I see is that it does not have the "oxford comma" for sentences such a Waylon Jennings, Anne Murray, Kenny Rogers and Conway Twitty is missing the comma after Rogers. Otherwise I'm not seeing anything wrong in the lead. MPJ-DK (talk) 17:11, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

Table

• Sorts correctly on all three sortable columns, have appropriate "scope=" parameters defined etc. cannot find a fault in it. MPJ-DK (talk) 17:13, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

I added the missing comma -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 18:22, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

• Support - that is an excellent piece of work. MPJ-DK (talk) 22:45, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
• Support passes my sourcing review. --Guerillero | Parlez Moi 01:33, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

• Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Giants2008 (Talk) 22:23, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 25 May 2020 (UTC) [17].

---

List of Ayushmann Khurrana performances

Nominator(s): ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 20:19, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

Ayushmann Khurrana is an Indian actor. Most of his films have been widely praised by critics. All criticism about the article is welcomed. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 20:19, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

Resolved comments from ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:59, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

;Comments on the lead "Khurrana, first appeared" - no reason for that comma "in a 2004 teen drama reality show" => "in 2004 teen drama reality show" "MTV Roadies, where he won the second season of the show" => "MTV Roadies, winning the second season of the show" "After winning the Roadies" => "After winning Roadies" "The film deals with sperm donation and infertility,[6] film received critical acclaim" => "The film, which deals with sperm donation and infertility,[6] received critical acclaim" "Khurrana's performance went on to win Filmfare Award" => "Khurrana's performance went on to win the Filmfare Award" "he went to star in series" => "he went on to star in a series" "and a drama Hawaizaada" => "and drama Hawaizaada" "In 2015, he starred in Sharat Katariya directed-romantic" => "In 2015, he starred in the Sharat Katariya-directed romantic" "His performance was widely praised by critics and audience,[18][19][20] the film emerged" => "His performance was widely praised by critics and audiences,[18][19][20] and the film emerged" "In 2018, he was cast in black comedy" => "In 2018, he was cast in the black comedy" "Then, Khurrana appeared in Badhaai Ho" - you already mentioned this film, so this reads very oddly "In 2019, Khurrana starred in series" => "In 2019, Khurrana starred in a series" "For his performance in the film, Khurrana won Filmfare Critics Award" => "For his performance in the film, Khurrana won the Filmfare Critics Award" "Then, he appeared in social-comedy Bala, where Khurrana portrayed Balmukund "Bala" Shukla who suffers from premature balding" => "In the social-comedy Bala, Khurrana portrayed Balmukund "Bala" Shukla, who suffers from premature balding" Start a new sentence at this point Think that's it for the lead. I will look at the tables later -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 12:26, 13 April 2020 (UTC) @ChrisTheDude: All done. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 12:46, 13 April 2020 (UTC) Comments on the tables Director column should sort on surname, not forename Refs would look better centred, in my opinion Ek Thi Rajkumari seems to be the only TV entry with no role listed - any reason? Don't use small text in "Guest appearance (to promote IPL 3)" Co-Composed should not have a capital on "composed" The note for many of the discography rows is just a person's name - what does this mean? Single is sometimes in italics and sometimes not (not in italics is correct) "Dum Laga Ke Haisha", on the other hand, should be in italics :-) Think that's it -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 20:34, 14 April 2020 (UTC) @ChrisTheDude: All done. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 10:34, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

• In the discography table, Orrey Mon should be in quote marks. Also, the note against that one - "Upal Sengupta, features Ritabhari Chakraborty" - what does this actually mean? What was the involvement/relevance of Sengupta? -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 12:33, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

• @ChrisTheDude: He is the composer. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 12:44, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 18:48, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

Comments by Dudley

• I think it would be helpful to give his date of birth at the start.
• "winning the second season of the show.[1] After winning Roadies," Repetition. I would delete second mention.
• Why not a column for the composer in the discography?
• Looks fine. Just a few quibbles. Dudley Miles (talk) 14:10, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

• @Dudley Miles: All done. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 14:58, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

• Support. Dudley Miles (talk) 15:23, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

Comment

• There's a bit of a problem with sourcing. Please check WP:ICTFSOURCES for the sources that are considered WP:RS for Indian film-related articles. Some of the sources in the article belong to Pinkvilla and Bollywood Life, which are gossip sites, and are this discouraged. Same for Buzzg, Tellychakkar, Indya.
• The lead is way too long, and contains quite a bit of extraneous information that is better suited in his biography. Please trim. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 09:47, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

• Thanks for your comments. I have fixed the issues raised above. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 12:09, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

• Ping @Krimuk2.0: ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 12:10, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

I've given the lead a major tweak, so the prose looks good now. Good luck! :) Krimuk2.0 (talk) 08:34, 2 May 2020 (UTC)

@Krimuk2.0: Thanks! ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 18:35, 2 May 2020 (UTC)

• Support this nom. Yashthepunisher (talk) 05:59, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

Source review – After the changes made in response to Krimuk's comment above, the source reliability and formatting now look okay. The link-checker shows no problems, so I think we can call this source review a pass. Giants2008 (Talk) 01:19, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

Thoughts as a drink my morning Diet Coke

• Box Office India looks a lot like IMDB. Can you replace the uses to a better source?
• everything else checks out for me

--Guerillero | Parlez Moi 13:08, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

@Guerillero:: I have replaced the source. Also, I prefer Dr Pepper rather than Coke. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 11:25, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

• Support --Guerillero | Parlez Moi 15:06, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

• Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Giants2008 (Talk) 22:18, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 00:26, 18 May 2020 (UTC) [18].

---

List of winners of the New York City Marathon

Nominator(s): Harrias ^talk 09:39, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

This list is loosely modelled off the existing FLs, List of winners of the London Marathon and List of winners of the Chicago Marathon, but with numerous MOS and accessibility fixes to bring it up to date. As always, all feedback will be greatly received. Harrias ^talk 09:39, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

Resolved comments from ChrisTheDude (talk) 17:29, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

;Drive-by comment Colour should not be used in isolation to highlight information - you need to use it in conjunction with a symbol such as † -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 13:00, 29 April 2020 (UTC) @ChrisTheDude: It isn't being used in isolation; the "Notes" column provides a written indicator of the same thing. Harrias talk 15:02, 29 April 2020 (UTC) That's a very good point :-) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 16:41, 29 April 2020 (UTC) Comments "35 men and 30 women have won the open division of the New York City Marathon, while 9 men and 7 women have won the wheelchair division, representing 22 different countries in all" - I think this could do with a re-write, as it kinda reads like the 16 wheelchair winners somehow represented 22 countries Ha, good point. I've rephrased this, and moved the bit from the end of the third paragraph up to the end of the first as they went together anyway. Harrias talk 14:00, 3 May 2020 (UTC) "There were 127 entrants, of whom 55 finished – the only female starter, Nina Kuscsik, withdrew partway due to illness." - source for all of this? This is all covered by ref #7 "2019 Media Guide, p. 122." Harrias talk 14:00, 3 May 2020 (UTC) "found the course was short" => "found that the course was short" Changed as suggested. Harrias talk 14:00, 3 May 2020 (UTC) "A wheelchair race has been held since 2000, when 72 people finished" - source for the number of finishers? Added. Harrias talk 14:00, 3 May 2020 (UTC) "Paula Radcliffe, winner of the 2004, 2007 & 2008 New York City Marathons." => "Paula Radcliffe, winner of the 2004, 2007 and 2008 New York City Marathons." Fixed. Harrias talk 14:00, 3 May 2020 (UTC) Think that's it from me -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 16:50, 29 April 2020 (UTC) @ChrisTheDude: Thanks as always. Responses above. Harrias talk 14:00, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 17:29, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (Stay indoors, stay safe		) 18:35, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
Comments WikiCup submission etc etc. Maybe I'm missing it but I'm not clearly seeing " since 2013, every race except one has had over 50,000 finishers" sourced in ref [1]. No mention of 2013 in there at all.. Yeah, looks like I lost a reference there. Added. Harrias talk 21:30, 3 May 2020 (UTC) "it has started in Staten Island and raced " something a bit odd about this, shouldn't it be "it has started in Staten Island and has been raced" Changed to "the course has started in Staten Island and goes through each of the city's five boroughs", how is that? Harrias talk 21:30, 3 May 2020 (UTC) "cancelled" should be "canceled" per ENGVAR. Eugh, American. Harrias talk 21:30, 3 May 2020 (UTC) " in 2012, due to" not sure the comma is needed. Sure, removed. Harrias talk 21:30, 3 May 2020 (UTC) "won the Marathon the most" no need to capitalise it unless you're going to call it "won the New York Marathon the most" Removed capitalisation. Harrias talk 21:30, 3 May 2020 (UTC) " race, in a" again not seeing a major need for a comma. Yup, removed. Harrias talk 21:30, 3 May 2020 (UTC) Could link Marathon world record progression? Linked. Harrias talk 21:30, 3 May 2020 (UTC) I'm just thinking on the first use of a time, i.e. 2:31:38, you could spell it out "two hours, 31 minutes, 38 second (2:31:38)" just for absolute clarity. The MOS is perfectly happy with this format, I'm not convinced we need to spell it out, but if you insist, I'm not that bothered. Harrias talk 21:30, 3 May 2020 (UTC) Use the same links for the same people, e.g. Rodgers is piped to both "athlete" and "runner". Hopefully sorted now. Hopefully. Harrias talk 21:30, 3 May 2020 (UTC) "Gary Muhrcke, winner of..." fragment, no full stop. Check the others. I've taken all the full stops away. This is probably also wrong. I hate image captions, and half of there weren't even mine! Harrias talk 21:30, 3 May 2020 (UTC) I would just write them all as sentences and then you know a full stop is always needed. The Rambling Man (Stay indoors, stay safe!!!!) 07:08, 4 May 2020 (UTC) "Adriana Fernandez" is missing a diacritic. Added. Harrias talk 21:30, 3 May 2020 (UTC) No wheelchair times were world records? It seems to be complicated because of all the different categories. I haven't found anything definitive. Harrias talk 21:30, 3 May 2020 (UTC) "Manuela Schar " umlaut. Added. Harrias talk 21:30, 3 May 2020 (UTC) Runners World is Runner's World. Sorted. Harrias talk 21:30, 3 May 2020 (UTC) "won the wheelchair division" this wasn't inaugurated in 1970... Back to "while 9 men and 7 women have won the wheelchair division" I think this should be moved to the final para in the lead where you introduce the wheelchair event. Moved these two to the bottom, as they go together, and I need to mull on them a bit further. Harrias talk 21:30, 3 May 2020 (UTC) Okay, I've left these where they are, but rephrased it slightly. I think it works best together as a summary, rather than split up, which would also get the article back to the situation that Chris raised above, where the nationalities sentence is awkward to find a home for. How do you think it works like this? Harrias talk 07:27, 5 May 2020 (UTC) That's all I have. The Rambling Man (Stay indoors, stay safe!!!!) 18:42, 3 May 2020 (UTC) @The Rambling Man: Cheers, I have tried something for the last couple now. Harrias talk 07:27, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

• Support I made a couple of adjustments for MOS and ordering, feel free to debate them if you disagree, but the rest looks tip-top, so I'm happy to support. Cheers. The Rambling Man (Stay indoors, stay safe!!!!) 18:35, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

Comments from Epicgenius

I'll take a look, given that the article mentions my home city. :D

Resolved comments from epicgenius (talk) 15:04, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

* Should we mention how long the Central Park course was? Do you mean how it was laid out? (One small loop, and four big laps.) This might be too much detail for this list. If you mean the actual distance, being a marathon it was the same length. Harrias talk 07:24, 5 May 2020 (UTC) In that case, never mind. I recall that Central Park has less than 26 miles of running trails, so any marathon would have to traverse it multiple times. You are right, it is too much detail. epicgenius (talk) 13:57, 5 May 2020 (UTC) Also, should we link five boroughs to Boroughs of New York City? Done. Harrias talk 07:24, 5 May 2020 (UTC) I think it would be appropriate to clarify that Sandy occurred less than a week before the marathon was supposed to take place. But this is not required. Added, how's that? Harrias talk 07:24, 5 May 2020 (UTC) Americans have won the marathon the most, doing so on 32 occasions; Kenyans have won 26 times, and Norwegians 10 times - a semicolon should be placed after "26 times" since this is a serial list with the semicolon as the separator. Yup, done. Harrias talk 07:24, 5 May 2020 (UTC) sub-3 hour marathon - would this be "sub-3-hour"? Indeed, done. Harrias talk 07:24, 5 May 2020 (UTC) between 1978 and 1980.[10] In 1981, - sounds weird to have years in two separate sentences being situated back-to-back. Rephrased slightly. Harrias talk 07:24, 5 May 2020 (UTC) Anh Nguyen Thi Xuan - any diacritics? Not that I can find in any of the sources. Harrias talk 07:24, 5 May 2020 (UTC) Weird. Vietnamese names have tones usually, but they are very complex. Not a big deal. epicgenius (talk) 13:57, 5 May 2020 (UTC) Yeah; I think it's probably mostly down to how people used the internet in 2000. I've looked about in Vietnamese sources, but that's a rabbit hole. "Nguyễn Thị Xuân Ánh" looks common, but in all honesty I couldn't say with certainty that it's definitely the same person. Harrias talk 14:27, 5 May 2020 (UTC) More later. epicgenius (talk) 00:50, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

@Epicgenius: Thanks so far. Harrias ^talk 07:24, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

No problem. I was wondering about the use of alt text in the images. That is my only other concern. epicgenius (talk) 13:57, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

@Epicgenius: Cheers, I have added some alt text. Harrias ^talk 14:59, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

Great! I support this list for promotion. epicgenius (talk) 15:04, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

• Source review – The reliability and formatting of the references look okay, and the link-checker shows no problems. Overall, I found no issues to report with the sourcing. Giants2008 (Talk) 21:15, 13 May 2020 (UTC)

• Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Giants2008 (Talk) 21:23, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 00:26, 18 May 2020 (UTC) [19].

---

List of Roman Catholic Bishops of Hong Kong

Nominator(s): Bloom6132 (talk) 02:35, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

I am nominating this for featured list because I feel its structure and formatting mirrors the other lists I have successfully nominated to FL and it now meets all 6 FL criteria. —Bloom6132 (talk) 02:35, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

Resolved comments from ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:20, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

;Comments First two sentences are extremely short and could easily be combined Combined. Would I need a comma between "Kong" and "who" (in the middle of the sentence)? —Bloom6132 (talk) 22:07, 28 February 2020 (UTC) Yes, I think a comma would be needed Added. —Bloom6132 (talk) 19:43, 1 March 2020 (UTC) "Became the first vicar apostolic" - should the last two words be capitalised (to match the heading)? Corrected. And I've also capitalised Valtorta's entry as "first Bishop of Hong Kong" for consistency. —Bloom6132 (talk) 00:13, 29 February 2020 (UTC) How did Bianchi resign in 1976 if he only served until 1968? My bad – I messed that one up by listing the date he retired from his titular see. Just a slight wrinkle – the diocesan source (ref 27) says he retired on 19 December 1968 (turns out this was the day his resignation was accepted). However, the Catholic-Hierarchy.org bio (not used here since it's debatable whether it's a reliable source) says he resigned on 30 November 1968 (and this bio is used as the source for a Macau newspaper article that would be considered reliable). I am unsure of whether this fell under nunc pro tunc as is usually the case when a bishop resigns. Which date should I use? —Bloom6132 (talk) 22:07, 28 February 2020 (UTC) I'm not sure - I don't know enough about how these things work. Maybe say "late 1968" if it's unclear.....? I'll use the earlier date, since I'm of the understanding that his resignation was backdated to that day. —Bloom6132 (talk) 19:43, 1 March 2020 (UTC) Why is Bianchi's death date mentioned? Elsewhere you only seem to list death dates for those who died in office. I was planning on listing every bishop's death date (not just those who died in office). It's just that the two retired bishops (Zen and Tong) are still alive. —Bloom6132 (talk) 22:07, 28 February 2020 (UTC) That makes sense - do you plan to add the other missing death dates in that case? Where are the other missing death dates? The first rows of Raimondi and Valtorta in the tables omit this info (along with the info pertaining to their later roles of Vicar Apostolic and Bishop, respectively) because that is already covered in the later rows. I don't want to repeat the same info twice. —Bloom6132 (talk) 19:43, 1 March 2020 (UTC) Sorry, that's just me being a dumb-ass ;-P -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 20:54, 1 March 2020 (UTC) Not sure the exact same picture of Tong Hon needs to be in the article twice Fixed – removed the infobox image (especially since a new bishop is going to be announced anytime now). —Bloom6132 (talk) 22:07, 28 February 2020 (UTC) Think that's it from me - great work! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 12:56, 28 February 2020 (UTC) Just wondering – should there be a comma between name and post-nominals? Or should there be just a space (as in Cardinal electors for the 2013 papal conclave)? —Bloom6132 (talk) 00:16, 29 February 2020 (UTC) I'm not sure. I am British so I am used to seeing information on people having OBEs and MBEs, and in those cases a comma is not used, but I don't know if the styling for these Catholic post-nominals is different.......? -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 19:12, 1 March 2020 (UTC) MOS:POSTNOM says either format is fine. I'll use commas here since there's only one post-nominal for each individual. —Bloom6132 (talk) 19:43, 1 March 2020 (UTC)

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 20:54, 1 March 2020 (UTC)

Resolved comments from - Dank (push to talk) 19:44, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

Comments from Dank: Hi Bloom. Standard disclaimer: I don't know what I'm doing. All this excludes Chris's comments above. I may or may not get 5 points in the Wikicup for this review. In the WP:FLC for List of felids, one FLC delegate recommended, and the other implemented, a suggestion to add alt text to the daggers: {{dagger|alt=Extinct}}. I'm not sure what that means, but perhaps you should add alt text in the same way to your double-daggers. Added. —Bloom6132 (talk) 00:59, 29 February 2020 (UTC) "Hong Kong": duplicate link in the next-to-last entry in the last table Fixed. —Bloom6132 (talk) 00:56, 29 February 2020 (UTC) "Antonio Feliciani": His Wikipedia article calls him Anthony. All other names in the tables check out. Someone must have anglicized his name here, because that's how it appears on the Diocesan website (under general ref), the diocese's archive (ref 14), and this source from the Holy Spirit Study Centre (unofficially affiliated to the Holy See). —Bloom6132 (talk) 00:56, 29 February 2020 (UTC) "from 1949–51", etc.: from 1949 to 1951. It's a WP:MOS thing. I think MOS:DATERANGE permits two-digit ending years for "infoboxes and tables where space is limited (using a single format consistently in any given table column)". —Bloom6132 (talk) 00:56, 29 February 2020 (UTC) It's at MOS:RANGE: "Do not mix en dashes with between or from. ... from 1961 to 1962, not from 1961–62". - Dank (push to talk) 02:24, 29 February 2020 (UTC) My bad – I overlooked that. Fixed. —Bloom6132 (talk) 07:30, 29 February 2020 (UTC) FLC criteria: You make excellent use of images, but this isn't an image review, per se. 2. The lead meets WP:LEAD and defines the inclusion criteria. 3a. The list has comprehensive items and annotations. 3b. The article is well-sourced to reliable sources (but this isn't a source review). All retrieval dates are present. 3c. The list meets requirements as a stand-alone list, it is not a content fork, it doesn't largely duplicate another article (that I can find), and it wouldn't fit easily inside another article. 4. It is navigable. 5. It meets style requirements. 6. It is stable. Support, since this is close enough to the finish line. Well done. - Dank (push to talk) 00:32, 29 February 2020 (UTC) Thank you very much for your review! —Bloom6132 (talk) 00:56, 29 February 2020 (UTC) Sure thing. Added a reply above. Also, I've heard we're supposed to announce it if we're claiming points in the Wikicup ... this will go towards your Wikicup total, right? - Dank (push to talk) 02:24, 29 February 2020 (UTC) Yes, I will be counting this towards my WikiCup total (if this gets promoted before I get eliminated). But a WikiCup competitor only has to mention their intention to claim points when they are reviewing a FA or FL candidate, not when they are nominating one. —Bloom6132 (talk) 07:30, 29 February 2020 (UTC) Ah, my mistake. - Dank (push to talk) 13:08, 29 February 2020 (UTC) I'd appreciate any thoughts or concerns you might have over at WP:Featured list candidates/Stearn's botanical names (U–Z)/archive1. - Dank (push to talk) 04:26, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

• Support. - Dank (push to talk) 19:44, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

Source review –

• Xlibris Corporation releases self-published books, so the reliability of ref 7 is in some question. For this to be reliable enough, Barrett would probably have to be a published author on the topic, or an expert in the field.

• According to his obituary in the NY Times, William Edmund Barrett was the "author of more than 20 books and countless short stories" on "religious faith and social justice". —Bloom6132 (talk) 22:33, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

• The all caps in a bunch of the references should be removed.

• Fixed for the names. I've retained the caps for post-nominal letters – hope that's alright. —Bloom6132 (talk) 22:33, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

• Other than those issues, the reliability and formatting look okay, and the link-checker tool shows no issues. Giants2008 (Talk) 19:23, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
  • I'm satisfied with the explanations above, and consider the source review passed. Giants2008 (Talk) 21:07, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

• This may be a stupid question, but since John Tong Hon became a bishop again, shouldn't he have another row after Yeung? ~ HAL333 02:17, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

• @HAL333: Not a stupid question at all! It is quite a complicated and unusual situation indeed. Tong is not "Bishop of Hong Kong" again (as in he never re-acquired that title). He is merely a caretaker right now until a permanent successor to Yeung is appointed. The only reason why Tong and Francis Hsu have that caretaker title (i.e. apostolic administrator) listed in their notes is because they either were previously Bishop of HK (Tong's case) or eventually assumed that post (Hsu). If any hypothetical caretaker in the future doesn't either become Bishop of the Diocese or was previously Bishop there, then they will be merely mentioned in a footnote (just like Fr. Gabriel Lam is in footnote G). —Bloom6132 (talk) 03:19, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

Okay, that makes sense. It's just an acting position.

• Support Nice job. ~ HAL333 04:57, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

• Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Giants2008 (Talk) 21:10, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 18 May 2020 (UTC) [20].

---

List of Formula One polesitters

Nominator(s): NapHit (talk) 16:46, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

This is my third attempt at getting this list to featured standard. I've gone through it recently to bring it up to scratch and hopefully it meets the standard. Been a while since I've been here, so apologies if I'm not up to date with the latest procedures. As always, thanks for the comments and the time taken to review, much appreciated. NapHit (talk) 16:46, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

Resolved comments from Bloom6132 (talk) 04:44, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

Comments – "Sebastian Vettel is the youngest polesitter, he was 21 years …" – either use a semicolon or an en dash instead of the comma. Rest of the prose reads well All images should include alt text For Jim Clark's image caption, should use en dash instead of hyphen between "1967-1989" Otherwise, all images utilized are licensed and tagged. The one general ref could be sandwiched in between {{refbegin}} and {{refend}} (to make it the same font size as the specific refs) For accessibility per MOS:DTT, left column of the key should include scope rows (see List of Major League Baseball single-inning home run leaders on how to format this) Again for accessibility, replace all the asterisks with the {{asterisk}} template If I'm not mistaken, bold or italics should not be used alone (i.e. should come with accompanying symbol for accessibility). For F1 champs, perhaps supplement with another accessible symbol like {{double-dagger}}, {{&}}, {{Number sign}}, etc. —Bloom6132 (talk) 23:40, 13 April 2020 (UTC) Thanks for the comments Bloom6132 (talk · contribs), I've addressed them all. NapHit (talk) 16:34, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

• Support – all comments addressed. I've made one minor edit to superscript the symbols – only a personal preference, so please feel free to revert. Looks to me like it meets all 6 FL criteria. Great work! —Bloom6132 (talk) 04:44, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

Note: I am participating in the WikiCup, and intend to claim points from the above review. —Bloom6132 (talk) 23:40, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

Comments from Harrias

• Ref #2 appears to be trying to cite all of this: "The "formula" in the name refers to a set of rules to which all participants and cars must conform. The F1 World Championship season consists of a series of races, known as Grands Prix, held usually on purpose-built circuits, and in a few cases on closed city streets. The polesitter is the driver that has qualified for a Grand Prix in pole position, at the front of the starting grid. Drivers are awarded points based on their position at the end of each race, and the driver who accumulates the most points over each calendar year is crowned that year's World Champion. Out of the 1,018 completed Grands Prix (as of the 2019 Abu Dhabi Grand Prix), the driver that has qualified on pole position has gone on to win the race 425 times." But... it clearly doesn't! Everything other than the final sentence of that quote needs to be referenced.
• Be consistent about whether to use "pole position" or "pole-position".
• Link Nico Rosberg.
• What makes Forix a reliable source? It appears to be "supported by" Autosport, not "published by" Autosport, so I am not sure it is appropriate to list Autosport as the publisher. In fact, looking, shouldn't "6th Gear" be the work, and Forix the publisher?

Forix is a part of Motorsport Network which is a reputable publisher of motorsport info and news. Think you're right about the publisher, so I've changed that. NapHit (talk) 17:22, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

• Ref #2 has a typo in the title. What makes "StatsF1" a reliable source?

Well, I was hoping you might be able to give me some help on that front. I noticed it's being used as a source in the Prost list you nominated here, and that it's also used in the Vettel list which has just been nominated. It's the most comprehensive site for F1 stats on the web, but I don't know how reliable it is. This scuppered the nom last time and I'm not sure I ever got a definitive response on the site's reliability as a source. NapHit (talk) 17:22, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

Nice way to turn it back on me! Having a look around, The Guardian have quoted StatsF1 as a source a few times, which is good enough for me. It is only being used as a light reference in this article, for a fact that could be removed from the article altogether if necessary, so it isn't a deal-breaker either way for me. Harrias ^talk 13:18, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

• Ref #3 needs publisher details.
• Refs #7 and #9, be consistent about whether to include "Ask Steven" in the title.

That's all. A nice list, not much wrong with it beyond the missing references in the first paragraph. I am participating in the WikiCup, and intend to claim points from the above review. Harrias ^talk 08:38, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for the comments Harrias, I've addressed your concerns and left a few comments above. NapHit (talk) 17:22, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

• Support thanks for your work on this. Harrias ^talk 13:18, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

Resolved comments from MWright96 (talk) 18:39, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

Comments from MWright96 "and in a few cases on closed city streets." - wikilink closed city streets to Street circuit "Drivers are awarded points based on their position at the end of each race," - points can be wikilinked to List of Formula One World Championship points scoring systems "at the front of the starting grid." - grid can be linked to Glossary of motorsport terms#G Reference 7 is dead and will need archiving or replacing with another reliable source Reference 8 is missing the author Reference 13 should have the work as the publisher for consistency "Senna holds the record for the most consecutive poles;" - pole positions "Sebastian Vettel is the youngest polesitter; he was 21 years, 72 days old when he qualified in first place for the 2008 Italian Grand Prix." - BBC Sport does not mention the 72 days fact; please use another source to verify all of this sentence "From 2014, the driver with the most pole positions in a season is awarded the Pole Trophy." - I think this sentence could do with a reference attached to it for verification reasons That's all from me. A nice list overall. MWright96 (talk) 07:00, 18 April 2020 (UTC) Thanks for the comments MWright96, much appreciated. I should have addressed all of your concerns. Let me know if you have any further suggestions. NapHit (talk) 17:53, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

Support Good work! Note I have made a minor change for consistency and have replaced the ESPN regs source from the early 2010s since it is outdated for this list and stated Q3 currently last 10 minutes. MWright96 (talk) 18:39, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

Comments

• The only thing I can pick you up on are the image captions - in some cases the driver's name is wikilinked and in others not, and some captions which are complete sentences need a full stop adding. Think that's it from me -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 19:18, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for the comment ChrisTheDude, I've gone through and made those changes. NapHit (talk) 21:44, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:26, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

• Source review – My main issue with the sourcing is that the table itself doesn't have any inline referencing at all. For a 2020 FL, I'd at least expect the table headings to have inline sourcing when necessary, which is a form of inline citation I've seen used often in tables. I just don't think a couple of general references and nothing else is strong enough for a modern FL, and urge that this be improved upon. Otherwise, I don't have any reliability questions that weren't discussed adequately above. While I'd like to see the general references alphabetized, that isn't a major problem, and the formatting otherwise looks fine. The link-checker tool shows no issues. Giants2008 (Talk) 21:26, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for the review Giants2008, I knew there would be something that had changed since I was last here! I've moved the general ref to the headings in both tables and moved the book ref into a bibliography section. Let me know if that's ok! NapHit (talk) 11:16, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

I'd almost forgotten that I made a comment here (sorry about that), but I see that a reference has been provided for the table, so that resolves my concern. The source review has been passed. Giants2008 (Talk) 21:16, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

• Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Giants2008 (Talk) 21:16, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 18 May 2020 (UTC) [21].

---

Daft Punk discography

Nominator(s): Philroc (c) 17:42, 26 November 2019 (UTC)

I am nominating this for featured list because it exhaustively covers Daft Punk's releases since the start of their career in 1994, including remixes, production credits and music videos. It is also accessible and reliably sourced wherever possible. I believe that all concerns from the past two failed nominations have been properly addressed. Philroc (c) 17:42, 26 November 2019 (UTC)

Comments

• "French electronic music duo Daft Punk has" / "Daft Punk released their second studio album" - so is Daft Punk singular or plural? Pick one and be consistent
• "They subsequently recorded several demo tracks with each other" => "They subsequently recorded several demo tracks together" would be better
• "Indo Silver Club" needs a reference as it didn't chart anywhere
• That's all I've got. Great work! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 19:18, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

@ChrisTheDude: All addressed, thanks for your comments! Philroc (c) 20:12, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:31, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
• Incorrect standard for tables (for example separate columns for "Released" or "Label"). Eurohunter (talk) 18:44, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
  • Hi Eurohunter - These differences are to comply with MOS:ACCESS as per the article's peer review. If I recall correctly there isn't a specific standard stating that the details all have to be in one column. Philroc (c) 21:45, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
    • @Philroc: It need to follow standard from previous nominations. Eurohunter (talk) 22:46, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
      • @Eurohunter: I still don't understand how a slightly different table format that WP:DISCOGSTYLE doesn't explictly prohibit is a significant issue, though I'm glad to be corrected since this is my first FLC. Requesting a second opinion. Philroc (c) 23:32, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
        • @Philroc: There are only 10 charts in tables due to space limitation. If add additional columns it takes that space. US Dance chart should be replaced with another national chart as there is already main US chart in the table. ""—" denotes a recording that did not chart or was not released in that territory." should be included in tables where it's neeeded. I'm not sure if "Production and remix credits" should be included in the discography. Eurohunter (talk) 00:23, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
          • @Eurohunter: "There are only 10 charts in tables due to space limitation. If add additional columns it takes that space."
            The extra columns may take up more space, but they help simplify the tables and make them easier to understand for those using screen readers to access Wikipedia.
            • Don't gues so otherwise it would be a standard but it isn't. Eurohunter (talk) 13:01, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
          • "US Dance chart should be replaced with another national chart as there is already main US chart in the table."
            The US Dance/Electronic Albums chart is a component chart of the main Billboard 200 listing which DISCOGSTYLE does allow to be included. Daft Punk was significantly more popular in this chart than the latter chart; for example, Human After All only reached number 63 on the Billboard 200 but topped the Dance/Electronic Albums chart.
            • Dance/Electronic Albums is very little chart in comparision to Billboard 200 that's why they had better positions and that's not argument. You could also pull out UK Dance etc. Eurohunter (talk) 13:01, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
          • "'"—" denotes a recording that did not chart or was not released in that territory.' should be included in tables where it's neeeded."
            This notice is already included at the top of each table in the article.
            • Shouldn't be there. Should be in the table at the end. Look at other featured discographies. Eurohunter (talk) 13:01, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
          • "I'm not sure if 'Production and remix credits' should be included in the discography."
            As far as I know anything that contains a credit to an artist is OK for inclusion in their discography article. Philroc (c) 13:24, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
            • Someone mentioned in my FLC that it shouldn't be there. Eurohunter (talk) 13:01, 12 January 2020 (UTC)

Source review

Doing a random sampling of sources here to check for accuracy. Refs 87 and 89 appear to be broken and should be fixed. The majority of refs are simply citing numbers and having checked about ten of these they've all been accurate.

• Ref 1--Going by Google Translate here but this seems to have been used accurately. Not usually keen to see several consecutive invocations of the same reference when it can just be appended once at the end, but that's really just personal preference.
• Ref 6--Mentions nothing of being a "landmark album in the genre", but is a valid source for the claim that it "brought worldwide attention to progressive house music". Needs rewritten or further sourced
• Ref 7--Accurate
• Ref 15--Used accurately
• Ref 16--Fine

Seems fine to me as regards sourcing; just one issue with ref 6 listed above there. Gʀᴀᴘᴘʟᴇ ^ˣ 20:53, 14 March 2020 (UTC)

@Grapple X: All fixed. Philroc (c) 23:51, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

• I don't like the citations to Amazon. Is there another source with the info?
• The link to the image of the back cover of "Harder Better Faster Stronger" is a copyvio --Guerillero | Parlez Moi 14:06, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

• @Guerillero: Are you referring to the original track or the Alive 2007 version? Philroc (c) 15:33, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
  • @Philroc: my statement is true for all images of the packaging. The fact that they are on Discogs doesn't change the fact that hosting the images has copyright problems and it violates the WP:NFCC --Guerillero | Parlez Moi 20:22, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
    • @Guerillero: Thanks for informing me, all Discogs links have been removed. Philroc (c) 22:43, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

Comments by Mymis

• I believe that "Production and remix credits" lists all songs that Daft Punk produced/remixed, which is different from writing the songs. For instance, "Heartbreaker" was solely produced by Daft Punk but you added another 4 persons as co-producers in the table but there is no source for that, and I think they were only wongwriters and not producers.
• For "Stronger", Daft Punk did not produce that song and the ref you are using does not say it either, Daft Punk only co-wrote it.
• "Gust of Wind", again, Daft Punk did not produce it and only wrote it. And the article you are using as ref does not say that either, it only says they are featured on the song which is not clear enough; you need to find another source.
• "I Gotta Try You Girl" (Daft Punk edit) is the only song on the table that has Daft Punk listed as co-producers, which I don't understand why.  Fixed
• I find "...denotes a recording that did not chart or was not released in that territory" a bit distracting, maybe it could be incorporated in the tables, the same way as, for instance, Lady Gaga discography. Just a suggestion though.

• @Mymis: I was told during the article's peer review that embedding the notices inside the tables violates WP:ACCESS, though I'm open to the possibility that the reviewer (3family6) may have been misguided. Philroc (c) 23:02, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

That is my understanding, yes.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 23:37, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

Table headers are apparently problematic for screen readers, so I would assume that putting the notice about charting in as a footer is equally a problem.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 23:40, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

Well, 3family6, that policy only mentions cases when tables have headers in the middle of a table instead of splitting them into two which probably does influence accessability, which is not the case in this article at all. However, it probably does not make much difference. Mymis (talk) 13:02, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

All I know is that an editor who is deeply familiar with WP:ACCESS edited Lecrae discography to comply, and they moved the notice out of the table into the text.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 14:41, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

@3family6: Well, because someone did something in some other article is probably not a valid rationale.. But I guess it is fine either way so not an issue. Mymis (talk) 21:49, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

• One last note. In the intro, you added "In the United States, the album debuted at number one on the Billboard 200 with first-week sales of 339,000 copies." Unclear why you chose to single this fact out about how it charted in the U.S. when Daft Punk are not American. I would replace that sentence saying it became their first album to reach no 1 in France (which is their native country) and stayed there for three consecutive weeks, which is a more notable fact to mention about that album. Mymis (talk) 13:02, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

• @Mymis:  Done Philroc (c) 14:07, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

Good work on the article, you have my support. Mymis (talk) 21:49, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

Comments by 3family6

The use of rowspan for things like albums and release dates is difficult for some screenreaders, and thus this page, like many, many other discography pages is probably not in compliance with MOS:ACCESS. It looks prettier to have the rowspan, but it's not as accessible. Izno has provided guidance for me on this issue.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 23:59, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

• Support Found nothing to pick at. ~ HAL333 00:44, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

• Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Giants2008 (Talk) 21:05, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 00:26, 11 May 2020 (UTC) [22].

---

Scarlett Johansson on screen and stage

Nominator(s): Cowlibob (talk) 20:19, 18 March 2020 (UTC)

Scarlett Johansson is an American actress who has starred in films such as Lost in Translation, and more recently in Marriage Story and Jojo Rabbit. Her most prominent role to date is as Black Widow in the highly successful MCU film franchise. This is a list which covers all of her screen and stage roles to date. As always I welcome all constructive comments on how to improve it. Cowlibob (talk) 20:19, 18 March 2020 (UTC)

Resolved comments from ChrisTheDude (talk) 19:30, 23 March 2020 (UTC)

;Comments Suggest merging sentences 3 and 4 together and the same with sentences 5 and 6, as they are very short "in Sofia Coppola-directed Lost in Translation" => "in the Sofia Coppola-directed Lost in Translation" In that sentence, do you really need (2003) in brackets after both film titles, given that you started the sentence with "two years later", which makes the year clear? Same with the sentence about 2008 "in Joss Whedon-directed The Avengers" => "in the Joss Whedon-directed The Avengers" "....in 2012. The following year, she starred in the 2013 Broadway revival" - 2013 is redundant here "In 2019, she starred as Romanoff / Black Widow" - maybe say "In 2019, she played the character again", to avoid repetition "in Noah Baumbach-directed comedy-drama Marriage Story" - guess ;-) Music videos - ""When the Deals Goes Down" - is that actually the title of the song? It looks incorrect Think that's it from me -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 17:24, 21 March 2020 (UTC) @ChrisTheDude: Thanks for the review. I think I've sorted the above comments. Cowlibob (talk) 11:00, 23 March 2020 (UTC)

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 19:30, 23 March 2020 (UTC)

Comments from Aoba47

• For this part (and in 2001 she appeared with Thora Birch and Steve Buscemi in the black comedy Ghost World.), I believe there should be a comma between "2001" and "she".
• In the first paragraph, there are two sentences in a row start with (Two years later) so I would revise one to avoid repetition.
• I am somewhat uncertain about this part (In the same year, Johansson played a woman going through a divorce in the Noah) since the previous sentence mentions films released in three different years. It may be obvious from context, but I'd be uncertain if someone who is not too familiar with Johansson's work would understand which year is being referenced here.
• I have a comment for this part (for both performances in the Best Actress and Best Supporting Actress categories respectively). I have always been told that there should be a comma before "respectively".
• Do you think the lead should mention Black Widow?
• Is there a particular reason why Cat on a Hot Tin Roof is included in the lead, but her earlier stage work in A View from the Bridge is not?
• Is there a reason why Ghost in the Shell is not mentioned in the lead? Johansson's role in the film received a lot of media attention at the time of its release, mostly negative though.

I hope my comments are helpful. Once they are addressed, I will support this for promotion. Aoba47 (talk) 01:36, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

@Aoba47: Thanks for your comments. I have edited the lead and rephrased the relevant sentences. I don't know how I forgot to mention her Tony Award-winning Broadway debut. Black Widow hasn't been released yet so I haven't mentioned it. I've not mentioned her role in Ghost in the Shell as the media attention was more about the casting (which is really the purview of the director/producer) rather than her performance. Much like Emma Stone's filmography wouldn't mention Aloha. It's also a pretty minor entry in her filmography that won't be talked about in a decade. Cowlibob (talk) 08:53, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

Apologies for the delay in my response. Thank you for the explanations. I would make sure to add Black Widow when it does get released. The media attention around Ghost in the Shell was certainly about casting, but Johansson's "I Should Be Able to Play Any Person, Tree, or Animal" comments did not help matters. I disagree with this, "a pretty minor entry in her filmography that won't be talked about in a decade", but only time will tell. Since Stone's filmography does not mention the Aloha casting controversy, I understand your rationale better. Thank you for bringing that up. I was just concerned that the lead may read as too positive, because while Johansson is undoubtably a talented actor with tremendous success, she has hit some rough patches. However, upon further reflection, I agree with you and I support this for promotion. Aoba47 (talk) 00:46, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

• Support – zmbro _(talk) 21:37, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

Resolved comments from User:SNUGGUMS

The file source for File:Scarlett Johansson 4, 2012.jpg doesn't work, so I recommend using a different image in place, preferably at a film-related event when this covers her filmography "Woody Allen-directed" from "starred in Woody Allen-directed psychological thriller" doesn't read very well; I'd replace it with "Woody Allen's" "in the Noah Baumbach-directed comedy-drama"..... same issue as before Using both "Natasha Romanoff" and "Black Widow" at the same time is rather much for the prose. I'd use one or the other here, and save the slash for tables. No mention of Avengers: Age of Ultron or Avengers: Infinity War in the lead? That seems like a glaring omission given her prominence in both! Italicize TV Guide Don't use MobyGames per WP:WikiProject Video games/Sources It should be good to go once the above is all resolved. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 21:39, 26 April 2020 (UTC) @SNUGGUMS: Thanks for your review. I think I've sorted the above. Cowlibob (talk) 14:59, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Looking better now, so I support and will assume good faith that File:Scarlett Johansson Césars 2014.jpg is in fact the uploader's own work when there's no evidence to suggest otherwise. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 18:59, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Comments from Guerillero

• Rotten Tomatoes as a non-aggregator looks doesn't look like a RS to me
• Newspapers/sources are inconstantly linked. I would either always link or never link. Trying to find the first instance is a recipe for failure due to how an article shifts over time

Those are the only sourcing issues that I see --Guerillero | Parlez Moi 06:54, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

@Guerillero: I think I've sorted the above, replaced Rotten Tomatoes and linked the publishers in the refs. Cowlibob (talk) 14:59, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

• Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Giants2008 (Talk) 21:07, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 11 May 2020 (UTC) [23].

---

List of Puella Magi Madoka Magica episodes

Nominator(s): I'm Aya Syameimaru! I 文々。新聞 20:12, 23 March 2020 (UTC)

Participation Guide
Support
ChrisTheDude, DarkFallenAngel, TompaDompa, MPJ-DK
Comments/No vote yet
ChrisTheDude (later support), TompaDompa (later support), MPJ-DK (later support)
Oppose

In Summer 2018, Deidaramonroe nominated List of Puella Magi Madoka Magica episodes for FLC status. It failed. However, I, self-named I'm Aya Syameimaru!, was influenced by Deidaramonroe's actions to take this back here. I responded to TompaDompa's comments in the 2018 review and fulfilled it well. Now I nominated this FLC status, so this should succeed. I'm Aya Syameimaru! I 文々。新聞 20:12, 23 March 2020 (UTC)

Resolved comments from ChrisTheDude (talk) 12:05, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

;Comments "It follows the story of Japanese 14-year-old middle school student" - "It follows the story of 14-year-old Japanese middle school student" reads better, I think Done. I'm Aya Syameimaru! I 文々。新聞 10:08, 29 March 2020 (UTC) Source for the whole of that first paragraph? Done, I completed it. I'm Aya Syameimaru! I 文々。新聞 11:06, 29 March 2020 (UTC) "Since then, more commercials have been shown in the same slot revealing the characters and cast" => "Subsequently, more commercials were shown in the same slot revealing the characters and cast" I fulfilled it. I'm Aya Syameimaru! I 文々。新聞 10:10, 29 March 2020 (UTC) "the broadcast of episodes 11 and 12 were delayed" => "the broadcasts of episodes 11 and 12 were delayed" Got it. I'm Aya Syameimaru! I 文々。新聞 10:10, 29 March 2020 (UTC) Ep 4 - "Out in the city Madoka notices several people, including her classmate Hitomi Shizuki, infected by the witch's kiss" - "Out in the city Madoka notices several people infected by the witch's kiss, including her classmate Hitomi Shizuki, " reads better I think Done, did as you suggested. I'm Aya Syameimaru! I 文々。新聞 10:31, 29 March 2020 (UTC) Same ep - Elsewhere, Kyubey greets a recently arrived" => "Elsewhere, Kyubey greets a recently-arrived" Done, did as you suggested. I'm Aya Syameimaru! I 文々。新聞 10:31, 29 March 2020 (UTC) Ep 6 - "insists that she gives up on Sayaka" => "insists that she give up on Sayaka" Done, did as you suggested. I'm Aya Syameimaru! I 文々。新聞 10:31, 29 March 2020 (UTC) Same ep - "Homura whom she blames for Mami's death" - add a comma after Homura Done, did as you suggested. I'm Aya Syameimaru! I 文々。新聞 10:31, 29 March 2020 (UTC) Ep 8 - "is an appropriate term to "witch"" - I would say "equivalent term" Finished the suggestion. I'm Aya Syameimaru! I 文々。新聞 10:33, 29 March 2020 (UTC) Ep 11 - "Homura's constant trips through time to try and save Madoka has" => "Homura's constant trips through time to try and save Madoka have" Finished the suggestion. I'm Aya Syameimaru! I 文々。新聞 10:33, 29 March 2020 (UTC) Refs 8 and 20-25 have no work/publisher listed and I don't think "archived copy" is actually the title of the source Just simply done. I'm Aya Syameimaru! I 文々。新聞 10:56, 29 March 2020 (UTC) Think that's it from me -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:47, 29 March 2020 (UTC) I finished it all quickly. I'm Aya Syameimaru! I 文々。新聞 11:07, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 12:05, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

• Support: Nicely sourced, good intro and summaries. Great work! DarkFallenAngel (talk) 13:18, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

I'm very pleased with how well this is going so far. «“I'm Aya Syameimaru!”I„文々。新聞“I„userbako”» 01:00, 3 April 2020 (UTC)

• I'd just declare this because no one so far has found problems. «“I'm Aya Syameimaru!”I„文々。新聞“I„userbako”» 09:35, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
  • There is no need to support your own nomination. It is taken for granted that you support it by nominating it in the first place....... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 16:44, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
    • Okay. «“I'm Aya Syameimaru!”I„文々。新聞“I„userbako”» 22:50, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

• I guess I should review this since I did so last time. I'll try to do that in the next few days if I have time. Leaving a comment here for now so I don't forget. TompaDompa (talk) 22:47, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Good, we're on the right track. «I'm Aya Syameimaru!I文々。新聞Iuserbako» 00:40, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

Resolved comments from TompaDompa (talk) 23:25, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

Comments: The table should not be sortable. Done, turned template into non-sortable one. «I'm Aya Syameimaru!I文々。新聞Iuserbako» 16:35, 25 April 2020 (UTC) In the first table, all the air dates have a reference except the first one. Solved, copied <ref name="mbs-official-site"/> to the first episode part. «I'm Aya Syameimaru!I文々。新聞Iuserbako» 16:38, 25 April 2020 (UTC) help each of them decide if there was a wish they would risk their lives for – this phrasing is a bit awkward. Replaced "help each of them decide" with "determine". «I'm Aya Syameimaru!I文々。新聞Iuserbako» 16:47, 25 April 2020 (UTC) I'd rephrase a bit more, though I'm not quite sure how. Perhaps by replacing "if there was a wish" with "whether there is a wish". Or perhaps "any wish". Or maybe even "if they would risk their lives for a wish". TompaDompa (talk) 19:24, 28 April 2020 (UTC) I sticked with "whether there is a wish". «I'm Aya Syameimaru!I文々。新聞Iuserbako» 19:48, 28 April 2020 (UTC) while Madoka finds Mami – "goes to find" is better than "finds" in this context (assuming I've understood the events correctly). I used "goes to find". «I'm Aya Syameimaru!I文々。新聞Iuserbako» 16:49, 25 April 2020 (UTC) As they continue Madoka mentions her wish is to simply be a magical girl and help others. – two things: Firstly, I'd add a comma after "continue". Secondly, I'd either add "that" after "mentions" or replace "is" with a colon, and I think the former would be better. Finished, added comma after "continue", and added "that" after "mentions". «I'm Aya Syameimaru!I文々。新聞Iuserbako» 18:12, 25 April 2020 (UTC) Mami laments that her job as a magical girl has left her lonely and afraid but feels happy that Madoka wishes to fight alongside her. – the sentence switches from the negative to the positive aspects very abruptly. I'd either add something along the lines of "on the other hand" or "also" after "but", or simply add a comma before "but". Resolved, added "on the other hand" after "but". «I'm Aya Syameimaru!I文々。新聞Iuserbako» 18:12, 25 April 2020 (UTC) notices several people [...] prepare to kill themselves – "prepare" should be "preparing". Resolved, edited "prepare" into "preparing". «I'm Aya Syameimaru!I文々。新聞Iuserbako» 18:12, 25 April 2020 (UTC) infected by the witch's kiss – this the same witch as in the previous episode (Charlotte)? If it is, then that should be made explicit. If not, the definite article should be replaced with the indefinite one. Resolved, I mentioned Charlotte. «I'm Aya Syameimaru!I文々。新聞Iuserbako» 18:12, 25 April 2020 (UTC) Later that day Madoka joins Sayaka on patrol, where they find a witch's familiar, but it escapes when Sayaka's attacks are blocked by Kyōko, who only cares about collecting Grief Seeds from mature witches. – This sentence has three commas. Either rephrase it to reduce the number of commas or split the sentence into multiple shorter ones. Rephrased to have two commas instead of three. «I'm Aya Syameimaru!I文々。新聞Iuserbako» 18:12, 25 April 2020 (UTC) Kyubey mentions to Sayaka about the potential Madoka has to become a magical girl – either change "mentions" to "talks", or remove "about" and move "to Sayaka" to the end. Used "talks". «I'm Aya Syameimaru!I文々。新聞Iuserbako» 18:12, 25 April 2020 (UTC) mentioning that something known as Walpurgisnacht is approaching in two weeks to which Kyōko agrees to form an alliance with her to fight against it – I'd replace "to which" with a semicolon. Semicolon used. «I'm Aya Syameimaru!I文々。新聞Iuserbako» 18:12, 25 April 2020 (UTC) Sayaka gets angry at Kyubey for keeping the truth from her – this should be clarified. Reworded. «I'm Aya Syameimaru!I文々。新聞Iuserbako» 18:12, 25 April 2020 (UTC) he keeps her in check by making her feel the pain she would have felt otherwise while fighting Kyōko – this should be rephrased for clarity. Rephrased for clarity. «I'm Aya Syameimaru!I文々。新聞Iuserbako» 18:12, 25 April 2020 (UTC) I still think it's a bit unclear. TompaDompa (talk) 19:24, 28 April 2020 (UTC) Rephrased again, it seems to be clearer now. «I'm Aya Syameimaru!I文々。新聞Iuserbako» 19:48, 28 April 2020 (UTC) Madoka asks Homura about the meaning behind Kyubey's actions and why she never told them – this should be clarified. I solved the comment. So many comments I was striking out in this edit. «I'm Aya Syameimaru!I文々。新聞Iuserbako» 18:12, 25 April 2020 (UTC) Elsewhere, Kyubey muses that as a "woman" who has yet to mature is called a "girl", it follows that "magical girl" (魔法少女) is an equalivalent term to "witch" (魔女). – putting aside the typo, I don't think equivalence is the right way to describe this. Perhaps "magical girl" (魔法少女) is the corresponding term for a "witch" (魔女) who has yet to mature. would be better. Filled in your suggestion; I agree, it would be better. «I'm Aya Syameimaru!I文々。新聞Iuserbako» 18:56, 25 April 2020 (UTC) I'd retain the parallel with "girl"/"woman". TompaDompa (talk) 19:24, 28 April 2020 (UTC) I think I retained the parallel with "girl"/"woman". «I'm Aya Syameimaru!I文々。新聞Iuserbako» 19:44, 28 April 2020 (UTC) Incubators are coldly logical, with emotion considered an illness, so Madoka can understand the process. – huh? Reworded it, period. «I'm Aya Syameimaru!I文々。新聞Iuserbako» 18:56, 25 April 2020 (UTC) The episode looks at an alternate timeline – I'd say "This episode [...]". Used "this". «I'm Aya Syameimaru!I文々。新聞Iuserbako» 18:56, 25 April 2020 (UTC) In the second table, "No." should be No. (i.e. {{abbr|No.|Number}}). Used the abbv template in the way you suggested. «I'm Aya Syameimaru!I文々。新聞Iuserbako» 18:56, 25 April 2020 (UTC) I'd add a short paragraph above the home video release tables. Checked. «I'm Aya Syameimaru!I文々。新聞Iuserbako» 18:56, 25 April 2020 (UTC) The references in the home video release tables are poorly placed. Either make a new column solely for the references (and name it Ref(s) – i.e. {{abbr|Ref(s)|Reference(s)}}) or try WP:BUNDLING the citations and add them in the table captions. Relocated refs to new column. «I'm Aya Syameimaru!I文々。新聞Iuserbako» 19:17, 25 April 2020 (UTC) The home video release tables have some abbreviations that should either be spelled out or use the {{abbr}} template. All comments resolved. «I'm Aya Syameimaru!I文々。新聞Iuserbako» 19:17, 25 April 2020 (UTC) TompaDompa (talk) 12:44, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

I made a few copyedits myself, and all my comments have now been resolved. TompaDompa (talk) 23:25, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

It's cool being with you. We both get nice jobs. «I'm Aya Syameimaru!I文々。新聞Iuserbako» 01:33, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

I think 3 support is a minimum requirement for this FLC to pass, I would keep this alive and wait for another person to support it anyways. «ias!I,,.I^userbako⬜» 03:24, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Source review

Since this is listed as needing a source review I am going to perform that over the next day or so, part of my promise at My FLC nomination. Note, while I am part of the WikiCup I am not looking to claim points for the source review I'm going to do. MPJ-DK (talk) 21:38, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

Quick feedback:

• What makes the following sources a Reliable source??

• madoka-magic.com
  • It's the official website for Puella Magi Madoka Magica, so it's a reliable source. «ias!|_,,.|^usbk» 02:51, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
• Anime Newtype Channel
  • It's an official website for the magazine Newtype, so it's a reliable source. «ias!|_,,.|^usbk» 06:51, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

• I see three different date formats in the sources - October 30, 2010 / 2011-07-26 / 27 August 2016 - pick the one that is appropriate for articles on Japanese subjects and make it consistent.
  • I picked "October 30, 2010" and used it for the whole article. «ias!|_,,.|^usbk» 06:51, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
• Anime News Network is not always linked in the citations
  • Resolved. «ias!|_,,.|^usbk» 02:51, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
• There is a "." after Anime Newtype Channel. - unless that's part of the official name it should be removed
  • Well, I changed "Anime Newtype Channel." to "Anime Newtype Channel (anime.webnt.jp)", so now this comment is resolved. «ias!|_,,.|^usbk» 06:51, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
• All sources should have the date it was published listed as well as the author whenever known
  • Resolved. «ias!|_,,.|^usbk» 06:41, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
  1. 9 does not have any accessdate or much else filled in.
  • Resolved. «ias!|_,,.|^usbk» 06:41, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
• All sources with Japanese titles should have "trans-title" defined
  • Resolved. «ias!|_,,.|^usbk» 06:41, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
  1. 20 does not have "script-title=ja:" set, instead it just uses "title=" for the Japanese title.
  • Resolved. «ias!|_,,.|^usbk» 06:41, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

First paragraph

• It is really through inference that it's this Anime that they are talking about as there is no title, no identifiable info that makes it clear they're talking about this series, not a different one.
  • Added a ref that says such a thing. «ias!|_,,.|^usbk» 02:54, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
• Sources 1 and 2 does not support most of what is stated in this sentence It follows the story of 14-year-old Japanese middle school student Madoka Kaname, who is offered the chance to have any wish granted on the condition that she become a magical girl and fight against evil witches. except her name I guess.
  • Added a ref that says such a thing, same solution as the last and next comment. «ias!|_,,.|^usbk» 02:54, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
• Atsuhiro Iwakami - is not mentioned in the sources
  • I archived the sources so that he's mentioned. «ias!|_,,.|^usbk» 02:54, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

Second paragraph

• The main source is printed, so WP:AGF on content for this one
  • I think it's good to go. «ias!|_,,.|^usbk» 03:55, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

Third paragraph

• I cannot find this information in the source The first ten episodes aired on Japanese television channels MBS, TBS and CBC between January 7, 2011 and March 11, 2011??
  • Resolved. «ias!|_,,.|^usbk» 03:00, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
• Episodes were then made available for streaming on Nico Nico Douga and BIGLOBE's Anime One service one week after broadcast. - Not sourced?
  • I removed the sentence. «ias!|_,,.|^usbk» 03:49, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
• Sources [7][5][8] are in the wrong order, should be 5-7-8
  • Resolved. «ias!|_,,.|^usbk» 02:54, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
• June 12, 2012 is not listed in the source, only the other date.
  • Resolved. «ias!|_,,.|^usbk» 03:00, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
• Article says "October 29" but the source lists the date as "October 22"
  • Resolved. «ias!|_,,.|^usbk» 03:49, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

Fourth paragraph

• both were released on February 16, 2011 on DVD and Blu-ray not supported by the source
  • Resolved. «ias!|_,,.|^usbk» 03:24, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
• On the DVD/Blu-ray release, the ending theme for episodes one and two is "See you Tomorrow" (また あした, Mata Ashita) by Aoi Yūki, and the ending theme for episode nine is "And I'm Home" by Eri Kitamura and Ai Nonaka. Drama CDs are included with the first, third and fifth DVD/Blu-ray volumes and the original soundtrack by Kajiura Yuki was included in three parts with the second, fourth and sixth volumes. The soundtrack is also included with the limited-edition North American releases. is not covered by the source, that just states the date is "unconfirmed".
  • Resolved, I believe. «ias!|_,,.|^usbk» 03:39, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

Fifth paragraph

• an original story set after the series was released in October 2013 - not supported by the source, it simply states "an all-new story".
  • Resolved, changed "original" to a quote saying "all-new". «ias!|_,,.|^usbk» 02:58, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

Table

• I know the plot does not need a source, but all the other information does, right?
  • I think I resolved it. «ias!|_,,.|^usbk» 03:41, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

Drama CDs

• source [18] does not state there are 4 CDs.
  • Resolved. «ias!|_,,.|^usbk» 03:41, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
• There are no sources to even confirm the existence of the first three CDs
  • Resolved. «ias!|_,,.|^usbk» 03:54, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

Home Video release

• No issues

That is the end of my source review for now, if changes and improvements are made I'll be happy to review, revisit and revise my comments. MPJ-DK (talk) 23:45, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

• I'm Aya Syameimaru! I am satisfied with the changes above, from a source standpoint I will Support this nomination. MPJ-DK (talk) 16:45, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

• Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Giants2008 (Talk) 21:12, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 4 May 2020 (UTC) [24].

---

List of Hot Country Singles number ones of 1978

Nominator(s): ChrisTheDude (talk) 19:24, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

So far my country number one songs project has produced 42 Featured Lists, so here is the potential #43, covering a year in which Kenny Rogers (RIP) advised us all that you got to know when to hold 'em and, indeed, know when to fold 'em...... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 19:24, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

Resolved comments from ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 11:39, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
; Comments from CAPTAIN MEDUSA Use {{Abbr|Ref.|Reference(s)}} Sleeping Single In a Double Bed → Sleeping Single in a Double Bed 1944-2005 → 1944–2005 Stardust &ndash Willie Nelson → Stardust – Willie Nelson That's it from me. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 20:08, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

• Support - I would appreciate your thoughts on Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Ayushmann Khurrana performances/archive1. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 11:39, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

Resolved comments from Bloom6132 (talk) 08:31, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

Comments – Refs 5 and 6 (both from AXS TV) redirect me to the homepage. Not sure if it's because I'm outside the UK. If it's the same for you, you might want to find a replacement on Wayback Machine or WebCite. Ref 10 is now a dead link (Margo Smith Chart History). Same recommendation as above. You might want to give the footnote its own section (same format as List of Hot Country Singles number ones of 1977) Read the prose in detail – looks all good. Images utilized are licensed and tagged, with appropriate alt text. —Bloom6132 (talk) 23:36, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

• Support – all comments addressed. Looks to me like it meets all 6 FL criteria. Great work! —Bloom6132 (talk) 08:31, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

• Note: I am participating in the WikiCup, and intend to claim points from the above review. —Bloom6132 (talk) 23:36, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

@CAPTAIN MEDUSA:, @Bloom6132: - all done, I think -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:52, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

• Support you have this down to a science --Guerillero | Parlez Moi 04:06, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
• Support Looks good overall. The only concern I have is the use of the phrase "In the summer", which is discouraged per MOS:SEASON MWright96 (talk) 10:27, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Changed -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 10:58, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

• Source review – The reliability and formatting of the sources both look good. The link-checker showed orange warning messages for some of the Billboard chart links, but I checked one of them and it came up without a problem, so I'm not concerned about it. I'd say the source review is a pass. Giants2008 (Talk) 21:45, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

• Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Giants2008 (Talk) 20:10, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.