Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Featured log/October 2014

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by SchroCat 08:42, 28 October 2014 [1].

---

List of awards and nominations received by Louie

Nominator(s): Wikipedical (talk) 21:58, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

Comprehensive, up to date, and meets all Featured List criteria. Last nomination was closed with one Support and no other reviewers. See Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of awards and nominations received by Louie/archive1. Thanks. -- Wikipedical (talk) 21:58, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

Good day, I will be reviewing this article, let me say, first off, how unfortunate about the previous FLC, I hope more reviewers will take the time this time around. Second, I must say, I'm not a big fan of these kinds of lists while the show is still running. Back in the day when I was still fully active I managed to get an awards list for Dexter to FL, yet it was demoted after a while because it was no longer up to date. So, I urge you to keep the page up to date (the Emmys, at this moment are something to remember). I'll post my comments below.

• In the table, could you replace the '1' nomination of the Peabody Award with a '-', as I believe a show can't be nominated for a Peabody, it just receives one, like the nobel prize.
• May I ask, when does an award get it's own section, the PGA's and DGA's for instance, why aren't they just in the 'other awards' section?
• I believe the SAGs are awarded by members of SAG-AFTRA as of 2012, not just the SAG.
• Why is the date in italics in the PGA source, that appears to be a mistake.
• Why do the tables have individual titles? They don't appear to be necessary.

That's all, good work :). If you resolve these (small) issues you will receive my support. Also, if you have the time, I have a similar list up for FLC at this moment (here), if you have the time it would be marvelous if you would help me out. Don't feel obligated of course, it is my pleasure to have reviewed this list without getting anything in return, Louie is one of my favorite TV shows (and how nice to see that David Lynch received a nomination for his guest performance, he was awesome in that three-parter).--Music26/11 00:19, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

• Hey Music2611. I have made the appropriate changes per your 1st, 3rd, and 4th bullet points. With regards to PGAs and DGAs having their own section- they are extremely notable and among the most prestigious awards in entertainment (the DGAs have been given out since the 1930s, before TV even existed). They are among the highest "craft" awards and I'd say deserve their own sections, as they do at List of awards and nominations received by Arrested Development and others. With regards to the tables having "individual titles," see MOS:DTT. Table captions increase Wikipedia's accessibility. Thanks for the review. I will be getting to a Boston Legal awards review shortly. Cheers. -- Wikipedical (talk) 04:14, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
  • I've struck remark 2 and 5, their both more a matter of personal preference than a violation of wikipedia guidelines. The table headers don't really appeal to me, they appear to give information that's already there, I mean they're right below the section header. But, again, it's a matter of personal preference, and it won't stop me from supporting, as you have done some good work here.--Music26/11 04:56, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

Support, my comments have been resolved, this list has the right quality in my opinion.--Music26/11 04:56, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

Reiterating my Support from the previous nomination. Cowlibob (talk) 13:55, 31 August 2014 (UTC)

• 'Comment from Crisco 1492

• The lead feels really light. A quote from the "positive reviews", a bit on the other cast members, or the co-writers... or something. Something to contextualize this is necessary. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:55, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

• Anything? This is about ready to be archived. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:22, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

• Hi Crisco, I have added a sentence summarizing other co-nominees. Is the lede long enough now? For reference, it's around 230 characters more than FL List of awards and nominations received by 30 Rock and 150 less than List of awards and nominations received by Arrested Development. -- Wikipedical (talk) 21:37, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

• Excellent. Support. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:17, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

• Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. – SchroCat (talk) 08:46, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Crisco 1492 07:39, 28 October 2014 [2].

---

Robert Downey, Jr. filmography

Nominator(s): LADY LOTUS • TALK 20:23, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

I am nominating this for featured list because I think it is a good representation of his extensive and still growing career LADY LOTUS • TALK 20:23, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

• Support very well-written and comprehensive, deserves to be FL. All my concerns were addressed during peer review. Downey himself would be quite proud :D! Snuggums (talk / edits) 05:28, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Aww thanks Snuggums!!! LADY LOTUS • TALK 11:53, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
    • My pleasure :) Snuggums (talk / edits) 12:43, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
• Support. Well-sourced and well-written list and it meets the criteria. --Carioca (talk) 20:39, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• Support Excellent prose in the lead section. A deserving candidate for FL status.--Skr15081997 (talk) 03:07, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

@Crisco 1492: Whatcha say about promoting this? :) LADY LOTUS • TALK 16:44, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

• Perhaps later today. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 22:39, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

• There's also Hahc21, SchroCat, Giants2008, and NapHit who could promote it as well. Snuggums (talk / edits) 22:43, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

• Comment from me, before promotion (well, after Cowlibob finishes reviewing): can we include a bit more variation? You use "appear" or a version of that word at least 8 times in the lead, and much of it reads as proseline (prosified lists). Better flow would be nice. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 09:24, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

• I did a bit of tweaking. Snuggums (talk / edits) 03:00, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

Should be better now LADY LOTUS • TALK 16:03, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

Resolved comments from Cowlibob (talk) 18:34, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

Good job overall. Slim pickings on this FLC. Add a citation for him being considered as part of the "Brat Pack". added Snuggums (talk / edits) 03:15, 26 October 2014 (UTC) Thanks Snuggums :) LADY LOTUS • TALK 16:03, 27 October 2014 (UTC) Why is "Good Night, and Good Luck" mentioned in the lead in terms of how many awards it won/ was nominated for, as none of them were for Downey's performance? Cowlibob (talk) 08:41, 25 October 2014 (UTC) I'll let Lady Lotus address this point, but will mention that Downey did not receive any nominations/awards for this one Snuggums (talk / edits) 03:15, 26 October 2014 (UTC) It sounded good at the time with how many awards the film had won but I see your point so I removed it :) LADY LOTUS • TALK 15:58, 27 October 2014 (UTC) This is also an awkward sentence. "The following year, he appeared in the animated science fiction thriller film A Scanner Darkly and Zodiac as Paul Avery in 2007." Could be misconstrued that he played Paul Avery in both of those films in 2007. The film bit after thriller is also not needed. I reworded it to be "The following year, he appeared in the animated science fiction film A Scanner Darkly and as Paul Avery in the 2007 film Zodiac", if that's still awkward let me know LADY LOTUS • TALK 15:58, 27 October 2014 (UTC) The Ally McBeal role and Family Guy role could also be moved so they are chronological as they seem out of place where they are now. Cowlibob (talk) 21:36, 26 October 2014 (UTC) Moved Ally McBeal and Family Guy so they are in order by year with the rest of the paragraph LADY LOTUS • TALK 15:58, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

• All sorted now. I now support this list. Another great job. Cowlibob (talk) 18:34, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

• Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:35, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Crisco 1492 05:29, 25 October 2014 [3].

---

List of Asia Cup centuries

Nominator(s): —Vensatry _(ping) 18:47, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

A list modeled based on List of Cricket World Cup centuries, an existing FL. Look forward to your comments and suggestions. —Vensatry _(ping) 18:47, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Resolved comments from — NickGibson3900 Talk 00:51, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

;Comments from NickGibson3900 Talk "Originally started as a biennial tournament in 1984, it has since been organised for 12 times as of the latest edition in 2014." - "..been organised 12 times..." (no for) "Players from affiliate teams such as Afghanistan, Hong Kong and the United Arab Emirates are yet to have a centurion." - Get rid of "Players from" "Pakistan leads the list with most number of centuries and centurions with 16 and 10 respectively, while Bangladesh trail the list with four centuries and as many centurions." "...leads the list with the most..." "Sanath Jayasuriya has scored more number of centuries than any other player in the tournament." (image caption) - "...has scored more centuries..." In the leads first paragraph Bangladesh, India, Pakistan and Sri Lanka should be linked "The first player to score a century in the tournament was Pakistan's Moin-ul-Atiq who made 105 against Bangladesh in the inaugural edition. In the same match, his team mate Ijaz Ahmed scored 124 not out. India's Navjot Singh Sidhu and Sachin Tendulkar were the lone centurions of the 1990 and 1995 tournaments respectively. The 2008 edition saw 13 centuries—the highest for a tournament—while no centuries were made in 1986 and 1988." - Should be in chronological order. 1986 and 1988 should be mentioned after 1984. - NickGibson3900 Talk 01:17, 29 September 2014 (UTC) All done except your last comment. I don't understand your point. Aren't the sentences chronological? —Vensatry (ping) 19:25, 29 September 2014 (UTC) Sorry I mis-read it. - NickGibson3900 Talk 05:45, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

• Support meets the criteria - NickGibson3900 ^Talk 05:45, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

Resolved comments from Cowlibob (talk) 20:39, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

====Comments by Cowlibob==== "Starting from 1984" -->"Since its inception" "Sri Lanka's Sanath Jayasuriya holds the record for most of number of centuries" remove the of "Pakistani captain Shahid Afridi" "His second century which came against Sri Lanka when he made 124 at the Rangiri Dambulla International Stadium is also the fastest in terms of balls faced in the tournament's history." "Sri Lankan Lahiru Thirimanne's" Cowlibob (talk) 19:19, 4 October 2014 (UTC) @Cowlibob: Fixed all. Thanks for the comments. —Vensatry (ping) 17:49, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

• Support Another good list. Cowlibob (talk) 20:39, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

Resolved comments from --Khadar Khani (talk) 13:55, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

=Comments— "...a total of 47 centuries..." you may add how many players scored these 47 centuries "The first player to score a century in the tournament was Pakistan's Moin-ul-Atiq who made 105 against Bangladesh in the inaugural edition." Moin-ul-Atiq scored his century in the 1988 edition not in the inaugural edition! Two consecutive sentences end in tournament history. The second need to be reworded No need to double ESPNcricinfo in the refs?! --Khadar Khani (talk) 04:42, 11 October 2014 (UTC) Fixed all except your last point which I don't get. Thanks for the comments. Will have a look at your list possibly by tomorrow. —Vensatry (ping) 18:19, 11 October 2014 (UTC) Why is ESPNcricinfo two times in some of the refs? I guess you're pointing out at the "ESPNcricinfo" in title and publisher parameters. The references were formatted using a script, which reproduces the page titles this way. I don't see any harm with that. —Vensatry (ping) 06:35, 14 October 2014 (UTC) Could you enlarge the lede image a little more? --Khadar Khani (talk) 05:11, 14 October 2014 (UTC) Done —Vensatry (ping) 06:35, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

• Support – meets the standards! Waiting for you at my nom...... --Khadar Khani (talk)
• Support. Meets the criteria and it is well-sourced. --Carioca (talk) 19:17, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

• Thanks all for your review and support. :) —Vensatry _(ping) 14:22, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Crisco 1492 09:27, 25 October 2014 [4].

---

List of Sega video game consoles

Nominator(s): PresN 23:27, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

Over the past year or so, I've been increasingly impressed by the way a group of users from WP:SEGA, especially User:Red Phoenix, have been getting all of the Sega console articles and lists up to good or featured status, and I decided to pitch in a bit. The result is this list, designed to tie together the consoles into a massive featured/good topic. I've gone through and hunted down, to the best of my ability, references for facts about the lifecycles, abilities, add-ons, and sales performances of every console Sega ever released, including the ones no one outside of Japan has really heard of. The consoles are illustrated, generally by User:Evan-Amos's delightful photos, and I think it's a solid little list that's a bit different from what I usually do. Thanks for reviewing! --PresN 23:27, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

Resolved comments from Red Phoenix ^{let's talk...}

Comments from Red Phoenix ^{let's talk...}:

PresN, let me start by saying thank you for your praise. With only Dreamcast to go, I wouldn't be surprised if this does become a featured topic sometime soon. In the meantime, I'd be glad to pitch in and do a review of this list, which FLC delegates should know for the record that I have not had any personal involvement in.

• Links to Advanced Pico Beena need to be corrected to go to Sega Pico#Advanced Pico Beena, as that article has recently been redirected as part of a rewrite I did on Sega Pico.

• Done. --PresN 22:13, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

• The 1UP reference link is down. Some of these have been appearing on the Wayback Machine as of late and also through text mirroring sites, so I'd try and see if you can get a hold of an archival link for that. It appears to be the only 404'd link on the page.

• Managed to double-bounce it: a webcitation archive of the archive.org archive. --PresN 22:13, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

• References all appear to be nice and solid, but on a side note I'd recommend archiving GameSpot links because they've been known by WP:VG to have some decay recently. That last part is not necessary for this FLC, but a friendly suggestion, just like all of my FLCs where you've suggested I do the same.

• Fixed my archiving script and archived all the online refs. --PresN 22:13, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

• It's worthy of note in the third-party variants that the Sega Pico was also re-released by Majesco Entertainment.

• Done. --PresN 22:13, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

• Per MOS:DTT, the wikitable should make use of row and column scopes. Row headers can be plain, however.

• Done. --PresN 22:13, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Everything else appears to check out to me with no other significant concerns. Fantastic work. Red Phoenix ^{let's talk...} 01:02, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

Oops, missed one: Quick fact-check! - "Handheld game console version of the Master System, though it could not play Master System games without a Master System Converter accessory[27]" This comment about the Sega Game Gear isn't quite true, and it's not backed up in the source used, either. It's certainly true that the Game Gear shared a lot of similarities with the Master System and even GamesRadar said "it was basically the Sega Master System in your hands", but the Game Gear was quite distinct in that it ran its own game library and cartridges, unlike the Sega Nomad, which just runs Genesis cartridges. The source, including other sources at Sega Game Gear, also draw parallels to the Master System but don't say that it was explicitly a handheld version of the Master System. Red Phoenix ^{let's talk...} 01:09, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

Split into two lines- first is that it was Sega's first handheld game console, second is that it's "Similar to the Master System, though it could not play Master System games without a Master System Converter accessory" - is that fine? --PresN 22:13, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Pinging Red Phoenix - thanks for reviewing! --PresN 23:23, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Support - Very nicely done! I've added Sega's logo to the lead just to give the article a little color and help illustrate the company which is the focus of this article. Sega's logo is PD because it doesn't meet the threshold of originality, so there are no image copyright concerns. Awesome work! Red Phoenix ^{let's talk...} 04:53, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

Comments from Tezero

In addition to Red Phoenix's comments:

• Intro could probably use some more citations for things not covered in the body... list, like the first sentence about Sega itself.

• Found a good "History of" article to source things to. --PresN 23:23, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

• I'd suggest splitting the opening paragraph after "the Dreamcast in 1998".

• Done, now that I've added a few sentences to both sides. --PresN 23:23, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

• Also might be worth listing Sega's formation date and saying a little about their early history - mainly arcade games and pachinko, I think - for context on what they were doing before consoles.

• Done. --PresN 23:23, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

• Why is every instance of the generations linked?

• When tables are sortable, instead of just linking the first instance you link them all, since you don't know what row is going to be first for a given reader. --PresN 23:23, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

• Not a requirement, but I'd like a little on why Sega's significant in the game industry (e.g. forming the first serious challenge to Nintendo, Virtua Fighter, Sonic the Hedgehog in the early '90s and again around the turn of the millennium, Altered Beast, maybe Jet Set Radio).

• I've added a bit about them being a primary competitor to Nintendo, but I don't want to turn the lead into a "history of Sega"- the Sega article should do that. --PresN 23:23, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Looks great otherwise, though, and I'll be happy to support in what should be short order. Oh, and PresN... you said to remind you at the end of the week about my FAC, so hey. Tezero (talk) 19:17, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for reviewing, Tezero! I'll review your article tomorrow over lunch. --PresN 23:24, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

• Support; good point about the sorting, something I'd never thought much about before and that's applicable to many, many other FLs. Not sure why you cited the same source twice in succession in the lead, but hey, sometimes that extra bit of justification is deemed necessary. Good work. Tezero (talk) 00:01, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

Don't mean to throw a wrench in this, but Jucchan claimed Pico's Japanese discontinuation date isn't in that source. « Ryūkotsusei » 18:32, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

Adjusted to just be "2005"; that was the year the Beena successor came out, and the last year any games were released for the Pico, but he's right that it may be a bit spurious to claim that the Pico was discontinued on that specific day just because that was when the successor was released. --PresN 22:13, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

Review from JimmyBlackwing

Resolved issues

Kind of odd that this nom has gone almost a month without any comments. I'll review it here in a few days. Reserving this space so the nom doesn't get archived. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 06:18, 21 October 2014 (UTC) Thanks very much! --PresN 16:10, 21 October 2014 (UTC) Prose comments "Sega is a Japanese multinational video game developer, publisher, and hardware development company headquartered in Tokyo, Japan, with multiple offices around the world." — There's a lot of redundancy here: "Sega is a ... multinational [company] ... with multiple offices around the world"; "Sega is a Japanese ... company headquartered in Tokyo, Japan". On top of that, I'm not sure "Japanese multinational" is a meaningful phrase. Aren't the two things mutually exclusive? "Sega has developed and manufactured numerous video game consoles" — We were just told that they were a hardware company. One of the mentions should be tweaked to prevent redundancy. "These consoles" — Fourth instance of "consoles" in two sentences. "during the third through sixth console generations" —> "from the third console generation to the sixth." "Sega was" — Three of the first four sentences begin with "Sega", which makes for a repetitive read. "and produced arcade games" —> "and it produced arcade games". "console development as well as video game development and publishing" —> "developing and publishing video games and consoles". "Japanese-only" — "Japanese" suggests a language, culture or ethnicity. Use "Japan" if you want the geographic meaning. "After releasing several variations of this console in Japan, in 1985 Sega rebranded their third version of the SG-1000, the Sega Mark III, as the Master System and released it worldwide." —> "Sega released several variations of this console in Japan, the third of which, the Sega Mark III, was rebranded as the Master System and released worldwide in 1985." A rewrite: "They went on to produce the Sega Genesis and its add-ons many variations and expansions beginning in 1988, the Sega Game Gear as their first handheld console in 1990, the Sega Saturn in 1994, and the Dreamcast in 1998." A rewrite: "Since then, As a result, Sega ceased to manufacture consoles and has focused on providing software as became a third-party video game developer, exiting mainstream console manufacturing completely." "In addition to the consoles produced by Sega, numerous third-party console variations have been produced by other companies." — I don't understand what this means. Variations of which consoles? Isn't this a list of Sega consoles? "for the over 20-year-old consoles" — A bit awkward. However, since any reader who pays attention will realize this fact for themselves, it shouldn't be rephrased—just cut. "Played ROM cartridges" — Past tense? As an extant artifact, I'd assume that present tense would be standard. Is there a prior consensus for this tense, or is it just a mistake? Same applies to all past-tense references to present aspects (e.g. capabilities, game libraries, etc.) of these systems. "successful, due to" — Grammatically, "due to" is interchangeable with "caused by"; not "because of". Applies to all instances of "due to" in the article. "but was successful in Europe" — Successful at what? "after the SG-1000 and Master System, released worldwide" — This wants to read "[to be] released worldwide", but that doesn't square with what's written above it. Problem could be fixed by replacing the comma with a semicolon. "Handheld version of the console named the Sega Nomad that played the same cartridges released in 1995" — Reads "the console named the Sega Nomad" and "the same cartridges released in 1995". All instances of "internet" should be "Internet". "but did not have its own screen" — What does that mean? Don't most home consoles rely on external screens? "a built-in NetLink component codenamed Sega Pluto" — Is the component codenamed Sega Pluto? "Still being produced" — Source? That's it for now. I'll cover the Third-party variants section when I come back. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 04:02, 23 October 2014 (UTC) Grammar issues addressed. I guess I was using past tense on any console no longer in production, but you're right, the consoles still exist and still play cartridges, etc. I think the screen thing was to contrast it with the Beena, which does include a screen (though it still plugs into the TV as well), but once the two consoles stopped being the in the same row it became an odd tangent As to the source... I can't prove a negative? Sega toys still has a support page up for it, ([5]) and there hasn't been an announcement that it was discontinued. --PresN 18:57, 23 October 2014 (UTC) Also, it's still for sale on Amazon.co.jp by Sega Toys- [6]. The "One left" message is because they're in contract negotiations with Amazon, thus the "we recommend you buy these other things" banner at the top of the page. (source- I may or may not have written code for that type of banner.) --PresN 19:19, 23 October 2014 (UTC) That's good enough for me. Final prose comments below. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 21:05, 23 October 2014 (UTC) "In addition to the consoles developed by Sega itself, there have been numerous variations produced by other companies both under license and not. The Master System is the earliest Sega console to have third-party versions." —> "Licensed and unlicensed variants of Sega consoles have been produced by third-party companies." The line about the Master System just confuses readers—I had to do a doubletake lower down, when it said that the Genesis was the first Sega console with third-party variants. A rewrite: "In Brazil, Tectoy created and released made a variation in Brazil known as the Master System 3 Compact, which was capable of functioning wirelessly with an RF transmitter,. An SKU of this console targeted at while they also sought to appeal to female gamers, in Brazil with the Master System Girl, which was molded in bright pink plastic." "under several brands including Coleco in 2006" — I don't understand. Is this another Brazilian system? If it was released under several brands, then who developed it? And why single out Coleco? "The Pioneer LaserActive, which could play LaserDiscs and compact discs, had an add-on named the Mega-LD pack, developed by Sega, in order to play Genesis and Sega CD games." — This doesn't seem relevant to a list of Sega video game consoles. "added the Mega Drive to personal computers" — Shouldn't it be called the Genesis? Ditto for all instances of "Mega Drive" in this section. "Majesco Entertainment released the Genesis 3 as a budget version of the console in 1998" — Where was it released? "Tec Toy" — Standardize the company's name as either "Tectoy" or "Tec Toy". "Another version of the console called 'Mega Drive Guitar Idol'" — Release date, region, publisher? "games, and a handheld console" —> "games; and a handheld console". "AtGames began producing" — Region? That should be it. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 21:05, 23 October 2014 (UTC) @JimmyBlackwing: Grammar issues fixed Yeah, that "earliest" line was confusing, and I can't think of a way to get the information across without it being a mess. Added release regions and dates to the variants that were missing them The LaserActive had an addon that let you play Genesis/Sega CD games, essentially turning it into a console, which makes it to me as relevant as the other "Genesis-in-a-combo-box" releases, like the TeraDrive knockoffs. --PresN 18:03, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

Support: Looks good to me. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 21:22, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

• Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 09:17, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by SchroCat 16:03, 22 October 2014 [7].

---

Timeline of Briarcliff Manor

Nominator(s): ɱ (talk) 20:37, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

Briarcliff Manor is a small village in the New York suburbs. It has plenty of interesting history and quite a few notable residents. The village also has a number of parks and historic buildings.

After working on the main municipality article, I decided to arrange village events into a clear timeline, which I just finished. I hope it meets all of your standards.ɱ (talk) 20:37, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

Comment from Jimknut

Resolved comments from Jimknut (talk) 19:15, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

This is a comment. "The following is a timeline of the history of the village of Briarcliff Manor, New York, United States" — fix the redirect of Briarcliff Manor done.--ɱ (talk) 16:56, 20 August 2014 (UTC) The year 1900 was the final year of the 19th Century, not the first year of the 20th, thus events that took place in 1900 are currently listed in the wrong century. Likewise, the year 2000 was the final year of the 20th Century and not the 21st. Hence the events of that year need to be placed in the current century. See WP:CENTURY. done.--ɱ (talk) 16:56, 20 August 2014 (UTC) Note here: "When using forms such as the 1700s ensure there is no ambiguity as to whether e.g. 1700–1709, or 1700–1799, is meant." I'm not sure the best way to fix this. In all of the instances in the article, it refers to the decade, not the century. Should I have it as "1900s (decade)"?--ɱ (talk) 16:56, 20 August 2014 (UTC) My suggestion would be to use "ca. 1901-10" or whatever date range fits OK, done.--ɱ (talk) 18:26, 20 August 2014 (UTC) The colored timeline bar on the right seems unnecessary as it covers the same events as depicted in the main list. Plus it seems very out of place since the events are placed newest to oldest while the main list goes from oldest to newest. At least one other municipality timeline used it, and it's a good way of summarizing the most significant events in the history, better than listing them in prose in the lead. I can easily reverse the order of the timeline. I wonder if you can find a precedent: I tried looking for municipality timelines that are good or were reviewed for FL or even GA/FA and didn't find any.--ɱ (talk) 16:56, 20 August 2014 (UTC) A suggestion: Place it and the "Historical population" side-by-side up top on the right were an infobox would normally go. Jimknut (talk) 18:18, 20 August 2014 (UTC) I'll try it.--ɱ (talk) 18:26, 20 August 2014 (UTC) I think it looks messier there. Perhaps it wouldn't as much if I found out how to make a box around the timeline, but I don't know how and haven't found anything useful so far. The previous placement of the timeline looked better, IMO.--ɱ (talk) 18:37, 20 August 2014 (UTC) The illustration "Illustration of James Stillman's farm ca. 1886" should be placed in the section of the 19th Century. done.--ɱ (talk) 16:56, 20 August 2014 (UTC) The illustrations "The First American International Road Race" and "Village Municipal Building decorated for the village semicentennial" should be dated. Jimknut (talk) 16:37, 20 August 2014 (UTC) done.--ɱ (talk) 16:56, 20 August 2014 (UTC) Thanks for the comments, they look good so far. I'll start implementing.--ɱ (talk) 16:47, 20 August 2014 (UTC) Additional comments Archaic period: Around this time, the area of Scarborough-on-Hudson is first inhabited. — Fix the redirect of S-on-H 1880 – The Whitson's Corners station is added to the New York City & Northern Railroad train schedule,[12] and the first train arrives on December 13. — Fix the redirect of New York City & Northern Railroad October 13, 1893 – The Scarborough Presbyterian Church is founded — Fix the redirect of Scarborough Presbyterian Church. 1907 – Law's Briarcliff Farms move to Pine Plains, New York, and Law begins developing Briarcliff Manor more as a municipal corporation. — Fix the redirect of Pine Plains, New York 1959 – Faith Lutheran Brethren Church is founded in Scarsdale — Fix the redirect to Scarsdale 1978 – The Scarborough School closes; it reopens in 1981 as The Clear View School. — Fix the redirect to Scarborough School Jimknut (talk) 18:18, 20 August 2014 (UTC) Per WP:NOTBROKEN, the redirect usually is preferred, especially in these cases.--ɱ (talk) 18:26, 20 August 2014 (UTC) Jimknut: Per that above guideline, it is best to have the redirects. It also makes sense to have them: it means that if the pages ever change, there won't be unnecessary piped links to fix later on. Please revert your edit.--ɱ (talk) 22:17, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

If you want a box around the timeline then go to the top and add "class="wikitable"" in front of "align="right"". Jimknut (talk) 19:15, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

• Comment – One thing that jumped out at me was the size of the lead, which is rather small for an FL these days. I'd expect to see a lead twice this size for a list of this length, and there are certainly enough interesting facts presented to be able to add to what's there now. Giants2008 (Talk) 00:12, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

Many leads serve a purpose of general information about the topic, although that's already heavily covered in Briarcliff Manor and History of Briarcliff Manor, so much that I thought writing any more in this lead would seem redundant, and just another re-hash of the same information. The lead size issue is just a guideline, and if there's not enough fresh information to fill it out, we shouldn't just throw in whatever to fill that gap.--ɱ (talk) 00:21, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

Comments by URDNEXT

Support as per comments below. I also provided feedback for the main article's FAC, if any administrators are wondering.

• Congregation Sons of Israel is formed by eleven men in Ossining - I think you should change men to people.

I normally agree, although the source said "men" specifically. It was a congregation of and for men, formed by men. Putting 'people' just makes it less specific and removes detail, and why?--ɱ (talk) 23:12, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

• Elliott Fitch Shepard's masnion Woodlea is completed. - Big typo here.

That's really not so big. Fixed.--ɱ (talk) 23:12, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

• The first twenty-nine street lights, all electric, are installed - Something off with this line. I'm not sure what.

You've got to be more specific on how you think it should be changed. I can't read your mind; the line seems perfectly fine to me...--ɱ (talk) 23:12, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

• After Hurricane Irene, a sinkhole about 20 feet in diameter forma on North State Road in front of a gas station and repair shop, and New York's department of transportation spends about $900,000 repairing the damage. - Needs copy editing.

How, where, and why? This seems fine to me too, what's off with this?--ɱ (talk) 23:12, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

Too big. URDNEXT (talk) 23:20, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

As in 'too much information', or 'not worded concisely enough'?--ɱ (talk) 23:50, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

@Ɱ Not worded concisely enough. URDNEXT (talk) 23:52, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

done, I don't know how much shorter it can be now.--ɱ (talk) 00:09, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

That's what I'm talking about, ɱ. I personally think the article is good enough to pass. URDNEXT (talk) 00:14, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

• During the week of October 14, the petition is filed with the town of Ossining and the village of Briarcliff Manor. - You should make it clear what the petition is for.

I talk about the petition in the sentence above. Not every bullet has to be independently understandable. With that logic, I would be linking every instance of Briarcliff Manor and Briarcliff Manor Fire Department throughout the whole article.--ɱ (talk) 23:12, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

• For some reason, peobaly the huge images on the side, makes the lead look to tiny and confined. I think you should put that big one somewhere else in the article.

I had it that way before; the above reviewer wanted it at the top. I can't please both of you...--ɱ (talk) 23:12, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

@Ɱ Hope this passes. URDNEXT (talk) 20:20, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

Thanks!--ɱ (talk) 23:12, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

@Ɱ I'm trying my best, but there aren't a lot of things wrong with the article. URDNEXT (talk) 23:16, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

Well that's good, thank you.--ɱ (talk) 00:09, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Comment from Epicgenius

Support – this seems like a pretty qualified list, though I will add more comments in the next 2 days. For now, it seems pretty well laid out.

One question, though; wouldn't the timeline in the lede look better if it were to the right of the census data? It may be a stylistic preference, however. – Epicgenius (talk) 00:53, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

I agree, although I'm not sure if it's technically possible. And the other two reviewers also had other ideas about its placement; I'm not sure what would be best, but it's such a minor issue that I think any or all of the options presented are fine. Thanks for the general compliments.--ɱ (talk) 01:18, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

No problem. Only one other issue — the statement "Rosemont, a Scarborough Historic District property, is demolished" is unsourced and there's no exact year. Otherwise, perfect. Looks like I don't have to wait until tomorrow to do the review at all. – Epicgenius (talk) 01:44, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for reminding me. I knew it had been demolished based on what the historical society had said, and since it's one of seven properties in the district, that it was important to note. I later asked one of the society members, who directed me to a more concrete answer and source. I'll fix that momentarily.--ɱ (talk) 01:51, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

All good to go. – Epicgenius (talk) 02:05, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

Support

• "The following is a timeline" is the cousin of "This is a list", and shouldn't be used. The reader knows it's a timeline- it's the first word in the title. I'd start the list off the same way the history of article starts- "The history of Briarcliff Manor, a village in the county of Westchester, New York, can be traced back to the founding of a settlement between the Hudson and Pocantico Rivers in the 19th century."

In its defense, that wording was taken from a very detailed and well-made municipality timeline. Regardless, I agree with you, I've changed it.--ɱ (talk) 17:39, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

• I'd prefer if the war points (e.g. "World War I") had dates like the other ones- so, "1914–1918 (World War I)"

Good idea, done.--ɱ (talk) 17:39, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

• Briarcliff Manor is redirecting, in the lead

I am familiar with three guidelines that support using redirects over piped links, so unless there's something I've missed, shouldn't the redirect be preferred?--ɱ (talk) 17:39, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

• "the house of Elliott Fitch Shepard is purchased" - you've linked him earlier, and you should probably mention that the house is Woodlea again.

Good catch, fixed.--ɱ (talk) 17:39, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

• Maybe add the annexation of Scarborough to the timeline bar, since you spend so much of the timeline on Scarborough pre-annexation. Maybe Mount Pleasant as well, since there's a gap there

I'll try it, but unfortunately that timeline template isn't so good, the 1906 annexation will likely be messily written over the text of the 1902 and 1908 info.--ɱ (talk) 17:39, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

• I feel like the lead could be a touch longer- maybe mention what size it is now, since you say it started at 1 sq mi, or what the population is/was.

Another good idea.--ɱ (talk) 17:39, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

• While certainly optional, if you felt this review was helpful, consider reviewing List of Sega video game consoles further up the FLC page.

Sure, I'll take a look at it, although it might not be for a few days.--ɱ (talk) 17:39, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

• --PresN 22:34, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

• Switched to support. --PresN 21:14, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

Thanks PresN. I'll make sure to write some comments on the Sega review.--ɱ (talk) 23:35, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

• Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. – SchroCat (talk) 15:55, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Crisco 1492 09:59, 19 October 2014 [8].

---

List of ICC Champions Trophy centuries

Nominator(s): —Vensatry _(ping) 17:48, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

A list modeled based on List of Cricket World Cup centuries, an existing FL. Look forward to your comments and suggestions. —Vensatry _(ping) 17:48, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

Comments –

• Add "the" before Cricket World Cup in the lead?
• List of centuries: This section heading can be shortened to just "Centuries", with the understanding that it is a list because of the article's title. Giants2008 (Talk) 01:13, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

• Fixed both. Thanks for the comments —Vensatry _(ping) 16:57, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

Resolved comments from --Khadar Khani (talk) 18:42, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

Comments – No need of "the sport of" since you've linked the cricket I disagree. There are people in some parts of the world who are not aware of cricket. —Vensatry (ping) 07:16, 7 September 2014 (UTC) Yes, you're right, but they can open the article by clicking on link! Khadar Khani (talk) 12:44, 7 September 2014 (UTC) True! In that case we need not append the word "almanac" while mentioning Wisden right? I see no harm in having a clear explanation of what we're talking about. —Vensatry (ping) 13:21, 7 September 2014 (UTC) Ok, your choice! Khadar Khani (talk) 14:56, 7 September 2014 (UTC) "the second most significant after the Cricket World Cup. I'm not sure about what you're trying to say here. —Vensatry (ping) 07:16, 7 September 2014 (UTC) You are claiming that this is the second after World Cup, so inline citation is required!? Khadar Khani (talk) 12:44, 7 September 2014 (UTC) Done —Vensatry (ping) 13:21, 7 September 2014 (UTC) "during the first edition of the tournament.[7]" → during the first edition of the tournament in 1998. No need to link this again since this is linked in the first para. Also, this is pipe-linked to the 2000's edition! My bad. Fixed —Vensatry (ping) 07:16, 7 September 2014 (UTC) "As of 2013, five centuries were made in the finals with only two of them resulting in victories." Also needs citation We don't have a direct source for this claim. However, this is implicitly verifiable through the table. —Vensatry (ping) 07:16, 7 September 2014 (UTC) Don't you need "of" between "...two them..."? Khadar Khani (talk) 12:44, 7 September 2014 (UTC) Good catch! Fixed —Vensatry (ping) 13:21, 7 September 2014 (UTC) The list should be secondarily sorted by "Balls" column! Done —Vensatry (ping) 07:16, 7 September 2014 (UTC) --Khadar Khani (talk) 06:12, 7 September 2014 (UTC) You may add Template:ICC Champions Trophy at the end of the list. Khadar Khani (talk) 14:56, 7 September 2014 (UTC) Done and thanks! —Vensatry (ping) 18:10, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

• Support – meets the standards! --Khadar Khani (talk) 18:42, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
• Support Made some copyedits and did some rephrasing of the lead. I think you should cut the picture description to just "was the first player to score three centuries in the tournament's history" as it's confusing to include the record bit but other than that another good list. Cowlibob (talk) 20:10, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
  • I've undone a few changes made by you in the lead. Agree with you on the picture's caption. Thanks for the support :) —Vensatry _(ping) 17:07, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

No worries, your edits were an improvement. If you've got some time, I have another accolades list up for review at FLC, Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of accolades received by Blue Jasmine/archive1. Cowlibob (talk) 20:33, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 16:56, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Comments Avoid easter egg links, i.e. don't link individual years to tournament articles unless it's clear you're talking about the tournament, i.e. instead of "in 1998," you should have "in the 1998 tournament" and tweak the accompanying text to prevent repetition. I've made a series of edits, mainly to avoid over linking or poor phrasing. Make strike rates have same decimal places. "Supersports park" is "SuperSport Park". The Rambling Man (talk) 19:59, 15 September 2014 (UTC) Done there I think. Thanks for the copy edits and comments! —Vensatry (ping) 16:52, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

• Support. It is well-sourced and meets the FLC criteria. --Carioca (talk) 19:19, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

• Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 09:51, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by SchroCat 12:30, 15 October 2014 [9].

---

List of Knights Grand Cross of the Royal Victorian Order appointed by Queen Victoria

Nominator(s): Noswall59 (talk) 21:24, 16 August 2014 (UTC)

The article lists those who have received the highest grade of one of the orders of knighthood in the UK at a time when Britain was a leading power in the world; the list includes foreign heads of state, notable British soldiers and courtiers and ambassadors, reflecting the diplomatic relations and social structures of the time. Due to the number of people awarded the honour since it was founded in 1896, it seems sensible to split it into appointments by reign, and this is the first, covering the appointments made by Victoria from 1896 to her death in 1901. Although not experienced in this process, I do believe the article is well-written, with a lead which introduces and summarises the topic well. It is complete and incorporates sorting on the name, country of origin and date of appointment of individuals. Similarly, all items in the list are reliably sourced, as is the lead. Many thanks, --Noswall59 (talk) 21:24, 16 August 2014 (UTC)

• Support

• What an overly-complicated way to say "the queen/king likes this person or something they did". Anyway.
• Letters patent doesn't seem to be capitalized like that at the linked article
• "Instituted with five grades, [dependent clause]." - missing a subject for this sentence, like "It was instituted"
• "The the two highest"
• "and the order remained in the personal gift of the sovereign" - you said that in the first sentence of the article already
• Any reason why you don't state the name of the "Prefect of the Alpes Maritimes" in the lead?
• You should explain the difference between a GCVO and an honorary GCVO. Also, you imply that some foreigners got regular GCVOs- any reason why? Any non-foreigners get honorary honors?
• "Where applicable, the occasion is that listed either with the notices, or in published material elsewhere, in which case, that material is cited." - whoa, commas. Try "Where applicable, the occasion is given that was listed either with the notices or in published material elsewhere, in which case that material is cited."
• Dash or office/occasion missing for "Field Marshal His Royal Highness Albert Edward, Prince of Wales"
• "(Caucasian Cossacks of the Line), in the staff of Nicholas II, Emperor of Russia." - why the parentheses?
• Also, why the period? You have this for several others as well.
• "Emperor of Russia's Coronation" - don't see why coronation is capitalized
• "Emperor of China's Mission" - same with mission
• "Emperor of Russia's Visit to Queen Victoria" - and visit.
• Consider linking who those emperors were
• Odd italics for "Membre du Conseil Supérieur de la Guerre, Inspecteur d'Armée"
• Parentheses again for "(King's Royal Rifle Corps)" - if you're doing it because the original title is non-English, list the non-English title first
• Why is the star before the honor for Gustavus Ernest, Count of Erbach-Schonberg* KCVO?
• Stars missing for His Highness Abbas Pasha, Khedive of Egypt GCB GCMG and His Serene Highness Henry XXX, Prince Reuss
• Stray periods for the occasions "The Duke of Connaught's attendance at the recent French Military Manoeuvres.", "On his return from active service in South Africa.", and "Duke of Connaught's visit to Berlin for the Bicentenary of the foundation of the Kingdom of Prussia."
• I'm really confused how the sorting by name is working for this. Some people you do first name (Prince Albert) while some you do last name (Count Benkendarf). Unless there's some strange rule that English princes don't get sorted by their last name, or that "William Thomson, 1st Baron Kelvin" should be sorted by Kelvin rather than Thomson and "Emich Edward Charles, the Hereditary Prince of Leiningen" by Leiningen rather than Charles, please be consistent in sorting.
• Ref 14 is linking to issue 26755, p. 3853, not the stated issue 26758, p. 4025
• All your non-book citations are formatted oddly; I think it's because you're missing a publisher for all of them, though that's probably because the publisher is the government of the country in question. That said, your book citations are also weird- you list all the bibliographic information in the bibliography, so the citations should just be like "McCreery, p. 29", rather than listing it all out again.
• Most of your redirecting links are capitalization changes or spelling changes, ones of note that you might fix are: Nicholas II of Russia, Russians (as Russia Empire, Austro-Hungarian (as Austro-Hungarian Empire), all your Generals are redirecting to General officer, you have KP as Order of Saint Patrick instead of Order of St. Patrick, ADC as Aide de Camp instead of Aide-de-camp, and PC as Privy Counsellor (UK) instead of Privy Council of the United Kingdom, and Carl of Denmark piped to Haakon VII instead of Haakon VII of Norway.

--PresN 22:22, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

@PresN: Hi, thanks for the comments. All those with strike-throughs have been addressed now. A few points:

• I believe I've clarified the situation with honorary knighthoods - let me know if I'm still not clear.
• I've also updated the book citations, but I'm not sure whether you wanted me to alter the non-book ones, so let me know if that's the case.
• As for the italicised part, it's like that because it's given in a foreign language, unlike most of the others (I don't know why it's like this, but that's how it was listed in the sources) - I can change it if you would like, but I don't see how that's odd.
• The parentheses include branch of service or regiment details, as opposed to offices; would you like me to remove them?
• As for the name sort: basically, those who held substantive titles (X, Duke of Y) are listed by their title; British princes are listed by their given names, even if they have titles (e.g. Charles, Wales, Prince of); those who were styled Dukes, Counts, etc. (Duke X of Y, Count X of Y) are listed by their surname if applicable (this is what has been done in the DefaultSort Count Illarion Ivanovich Vorontsov-Dashkov's article). I've corrected Leiningen's, but Kelvin does not need updating, nor does Prince Albert. See WP:PEERS.
• The redirects for Knight of St Patrick, Privy Councillor and Aide-de-Camp are all from the "post-nominals" template, so I can't alter them. The rest have been corrected.

Thank you again for your review, these corrections are certainly improving the article. --Noswall59 (talk) 08:15, 20 August 2014 (UTC).

Alright, made a few tweaks, but changing to support. --PresN 17:45, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

Thanks again, --Noswall59 (talk) 19:52, 20 August 2014 (UTC).

• Support. Excellent work. Well-written and well-sourced list. --Carioca (talk) 19:39, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for the support, --Noswall59 (talk) 20:53, 22 August 2014 (UTC).

• It remains in the personal gift of the monarch - Not sure what you mean here.

Basically, most honours in the UK are now awarded by the government; the king/queen are only nominally involved; however, this particular award is still handed out by the monarch without any involvement by the government. Hopefully my alterations make this clear.

• "It is granted personally by the monarch", perhaps? — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:10, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

•  Done.

• one Austro-Hungarian, Chinese, Dane, Egyptian, Montenegrin and Spanish citizens. - feels like you're missing something. Maybe "and one"... would help...

 Done.

• King of Spain, Emperor of Germany and Prince of Montenegro -Link them?

The positions or the office-holders?

• office holders, assuming there was only one during this period. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:10, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

•  Done

• This along with a * indicates that the appointment was Honorary. - Colour-blind people will have problems with "this". Perhaps state what "this" is? — Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:09, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

How do I do that? I thought the star would be enough... I notice a similar method has been used on the List of Victoria Cross recipient articles, for instance List of Victoria Cross recipients (A–F)

• I'd have raised the same issue if I'd reviewed that list. Then again, looking at the other articles in this category, it looks like that's already standardized. No worries then. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:10, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

Nominator response: Hi @Crisco 1492:, thanks for your feedback. I've commented above, and asked some questions. I am happy to make any changes once you've responded and clarified where I'm not so sure. Many thanks, --Noswall59 (talk) 20:00, 14 October 2014 (UTC).

Thanks again @Crisco 1492:, I've altered everything as requested. --Noswall59 (talk) 08:24, 15 October 2014 (UTC).

• Support - Good work. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 09:58, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

Many thanks, --Noswall59 (talk) 10:14, 15 October 2014 (UTC).

• Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. – SchroCat (talk) 12:34, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Giants2008 01:07, 13 October 2014 [10].

---

Tom Hanks on screen and stage

Nominator(s): Cowlibob (talk) 18:42, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

I am nominating this list because I think it gives a good summary of Hanks' extensive career as both an actor and as producer. As always look forward to all the helpful comments to improve it. Cowlibob (talk) 18:42, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

Support Looks excellent to me.♦ Dr. Blofeld 20:36, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

Comments from Skr15081997

• Put a comma after "Hanks made his debut as a director and screenwriter in the 1996 musical comedy, That Thing You Do!".
• Ref. 38 has an unnecessary space between the publisher and the closing ")".
• In Ref. 45 The New York Times is unlinked.
• Link Roger Ebert and Box Office Mojo.
• Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences is not linked in Refs. 12 & 14.

These are minor issues which I can fix but don't know whether this is allowed or not.--Skr15081997 (talk) 12:14, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

@Skr15081997: I've fixed point 2-5. Not sure what you mean by the first one as they're two separate sentences. Cowlibob (talk) 16:32, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Support Excellent work.--Skr15081997 (talk) 10:18, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

• Support. Excellent list, meets the FLC criteria and it is well-sourced. --Carioca (talk) 19:38, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

• Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Giants2008 (Talk) 01:44, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by User Giants2008 01:07, 13 October 2014 [11].

---

List of international cricket five-wicket hauls by Mitchell Johnson

Nominator(s): NG39 (talk) 07:42, 20 September 2014 (UTC), Macosal (talk) 07:42, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

This article was created by Macosal. Then their was one more edit from Macosal and then an edit from FrescoBot. And finally my one edit. You might ask how can a list with only four revisions be up to FL standard and how can a nom only have made one edit to it. Well Macosal's original article was very good and my edit took seven hours and had at least 100 "show previews". In that edit; I completely rewrote the lead, added 2 pictures and more references. Since this nom was filed I have done another four edits (2 DAB fixes, 1 ref fix and a key change). This is my first FLC so any comments positive or negative are welcome -- NickGibson3900 ^Talk 07:42, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

Comment – Did you have a word with Macosal prior to initiating this nomination? —Vensatry _(ping) 04:18, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

@Vensatry:, I mentioned it on his talk page but he hasn't replied. Considering I wrote all the prose and kept the actual list bit he did I don't see your point - NickGibson3900 ^Talk 04:48, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

Yes can confirm I was made aware of the nomination on my talk page. Macosal (talk) 06:39, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

NickGibson3900, I was just asking you. I see that you have added Macosal as a co-nom. —Vensatry _(ping) 18:09, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

@Vensatry: Ok cool, sorry for any misunderstanding. BTW would who like to do a full review of this. Your choice. NickGibson3900 ^Talk 05:25, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Done. Would you like to have a look at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of ICC Champions Trophy centuries/archive1 and Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Asia Cup centuries/archive1? —Vensatry _(ping) 18:06, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Resolved comments from --Khadar Khani (talk) 17:12, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

Comments— ...as of August 2014 only 41 bowlers have taken 15... → 42 bowlers have taken 15 or more fifers "Johnson ranks ninth in the number of international five-wicket hauls among Australian cricketers[a] and equal 39th among all players." → "He ranks thirty-ninth among all-time combined five-wicket haul takers, and ninth in the equivalent list for Australia." Shifting the existing note at the end of the sentence, also consider adding a not after the comma like He shares the position with Alec Bedser, Danish Kaneria and Craig McDermott. Also provide inline citations for them. The GABBA → the GABBA His best haul of wickets is 8 wickets for 61 runs... → "His best bowling figures for an innings are 8 wickets for 61 runs." In the Key table: "Result for the India team" → this should be Australia not India Wkts column should sort secondarily to the Runs column. Wkts column also needs rowscopes Link "Drawn" Date for the first ref is 16 August 2008 You are using both dmy and mdy, be consistent with the date format I'll revisit again once the above concerns resolve. --Khadar Khani (talk) 03:36, 22 September 2014 (UTC) @Sahara4u: Thanks for your comments. I think I've addressed them all. -- NickGibson3900 Talk 07:55, 26 September 2014 (UTC) It should be "as of September 2014" throughout the article Johnson is ranked equal thirty-ninth with Alec Bedser, Craig McDermott and Danish Kaneria. --Khadar Khani (talk) 11:40, 27 September 2014 (UTC) @Sahara4u: Done both points - NickGibson3900 Talk 05:40, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

• Support – I've made an edit there. Meets the standards! --Khadar Khani (talk) 17:12, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

Resolved comments from —Vensatry (ping) 18:33, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

Comments from —Vensatry (ping) 15 or more five-wicket hauls at international level in their cricketing careers -> 15 or more five-wicket hauls at the international level Hyphens in dates (refs.) should be replaced by dashes. I've done this for you. —Vensatry (ping) 19:18, 29 September 2014 (UTC) With 15 fifers, his position is joint with Craig McDermott and Danish Kaneria. This should be noted rather than a list of players who have taken more fifers than him. Ref #3 and #5 are from the same publisher and convey the same thing. Either one should be sufficient. "Johnson made his Test debut against Sri Lanka in 2007" is unsourced "His first five-wicket haul came against New Zealand during the first Test of the 2008–09 series at the Gabba" - The ref. doesn't mention anywhere that this was his first fifer in Test cricket. Refs #7 and #6 should be interchanged to make things better. Sorry but as the ref numbers have jumped around which ones do you mean. Please say the title not the number - NickGibson3900 Talk 06:29, 24 September 2014 (UTC) Shift ref #5 to the end of "Australians' victory by 149 runs." —Vensatry (ping) 19:18, 29 September 2014 (UTC) Pipe-linking against to South African cricket team in Australia in 2008–09 borders WP:EASTEREGG. Better to have the phrase "against South Africa" in pipe. 5 of his 15 in Test cricket -> 5 of his 12 in Test cricket Why is the key awkwardly aligned to the right? That was done by @The-Pope: I'll revert if The-Pope doesn't good a valid reason for the change. - NickGibson3900 Talk 06:11, 24 September 2014 (UTC) Having the key before the list looks awful. It is huge, ugly, irrelevant for a lot of people viewing the article and distracting from the actual information. When I complained about a similar issue with football stats, someone put it off to the right and I thought that that was a great idea. If you can align it better, then fine, but I hate every single one of these cookie cutter copies of feature lists that highlights HOW we are telling the reader the information over the actual information. The Key had it's own section heading, FFS. If you don't like it on the right, move it to the end, make it smaller, use inline notes or whatever, but it is a blight on the lists to have the Key in such a prominent position. I would have rejected all of them as feature lists with such an poor article design. The-Pope (talk) 06:52, 24 September 2014 (UTC) @The-Pope: I have mentioned it to WikiProject Cricket here and there is already strong opposition - NickGibson3900 Talk 07:50, 24 September 2014 (UTC) //Having the key before the list looks awful// Really? If so where should we place the key? end of the page?. NickGibson3900, User:The-Pope's argument is pretty much a case of WP:IDL. So it's better if we ignore it. —Vensatry (ping) 19:18, 29 September 2014 (UTC) Why wickets column is emboldened? Since both the tables have equal number of columns, I'd like to see uniformity in width. Wickets columns should sort secondarily by runs conceded. How would I do that? - NickGibson3900 Talk 06:45, 24 September 2014 (UTC) Done - 09:26, 24 September 2014 (UTC) Link Orient Blackswan in refs. Ref #7 needs date Once again which ref? - NickGibson3900 Talk 06:45, 24 September 2014 (UTC) Ref #6 at present —Vensatry (ping) 19:18, 29 September 2014 (UTC) Check the title for ref #11. It talks about an ODI game. This is not done. Check the title of the page —Vensatry (ping) 19:18, 29 September 2014 (UTC) His first ODI fifer came against India, not West Indies. The succeeding sentence also needs to be corrected. —Vensatry (ping) 19:18, 29 September 2014 (UTC) "His career best figures are 6 wickets for 31 against ...". Something is missing here. —Vensatry (ping) 17:57, 23 September 2014 (UTC) @Vensatry: All done, will comment of your FLCs soon - NickGibson3900 Talk 07:55, 26 September 2014 (UTC) Vensatry Done I think. - NickGibson3900 Talk 05:39, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

• Support - Nice list. Happy to support! —Vensatry _(ping) 18:33, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

Comments

• Image captions which are complete sentences should use a full stop.
• "during the 2009 Ashes" would prefer to see "series" at the end of that.
• When sorting by wickets, equal wickets with fewer runs is better so should sort in that order.
• Check ref titles for correct use of en-dash for date ranges.

The Rambling Man (talk) 08:58, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

@The Rambling Man: Thanks for the review! Done point 1, 2, 4. As stated above I'm not sure how to do point three. - NickGibson3900 ^Talk 09:08, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

Take a look at the sort key coding on an existing FL of this type. The Rambling Man (talk) 09:10, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

@The Rambling Man: thanks for the tip. I worked it out and it should be fine now. Any more comments or is this list okay now? - NickGibson3900 ^Talk 07:55, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

Resolved comments from Cowlibob (talk) 18:27, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

====Comments by Cowlibob==== How about "Johnson has taken 264 wickets in Test matches, 212 wickets in ODIs and 38 wickets in T20Is." Partly done, I changed the above but left: As of September, "His best bowling figures for an innings are 8 wickets for 61 runs against" Already done "His 5 wickets..." sentence. How about "His 5 wickets for 39 runs in the second innings raised his tally to 9 wickets for the match. Australia won the match by 149 runs and his performance earned him the man-of-the-match award." Done How about instead of "The majority of his fifers came against England—5 of his 12 in Test cricket --> In Test matches, Johnson has been most successful against England, taking 5 of his 12 five-wicket hauls against them. Done Instead of "Making his ODI debut against New Zealand in 2005, Johnson's first five-wicket haul came against India in 2007." These two fragments are not connected to each other. How about "In 2005, Johnson made his ODI debut against New Zealand. He took his first five-wicket haul against India in 2007." Done Alt text is not appropriate for the images. As per WP:ALT, the alt text should not comment on clothes unless it's a fashion article and should include the person's name. Fixed Cowlibob (talk) 18:47, 4 October 2014 (UTC) @Cowlibob: All done — NickGibson3900 Talk 05:48, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

• Support - Good job. Cowlibob (talk) 18:27, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
• Support. Meets the criteria, well-sourced and well-written. --Carioca (talk) 21:07, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

• Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Giants2008 (Talk) 01:49, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.