Wikipedia:Featured list removal candidates/log/April 2006
No longer a Featured list.
Promoted June 2005.
Where to start?
- This list has way too many redlinks. There are 66 items in this list, and 38 redlinks. Doing the math reveals that this is actually a majority of the links on this page.
- The References in the References section are actually explanatory footnotes.
- It uses depreciated inline links as references.
- How can a list that mentions in its lead that it is "an incomplete list" possibly be comprehensive?
Remove for all of these reasons. Miss Madeline | Talk to Madeline 19:04, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
- Remove. Additionally, it could use some more explanatory text. -- Rune Welsh | ταλκ 19:29, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
- Remove. I've done a lot of work on this and related lists and I still agree that this article does not meet the standards for a featured list. I wish it did, and frankly I really wish this list could get improved. But until it does, it's not feature-worthy. —Markles 22:12, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
- Remove. I think enough's been said on the rationale for removal from the featured lists page, but …
Sorry for interrupting! I moved the following discussion to Talk:List of United States House committees, so it can be handled better there. —Markles 18:09, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
|