![]() | Administrators: Please do not delete this category as empty! This category may be empty occasionally or even most of the time. |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | B | C | Start | Stub | ![]() | List | Category | NA | ??? |
31 | 1 | 131 | 739 | 2,588 | 6,219 | 4,197 | 1 | 245 | 3,643 | 1,069 | 39 |
- Parent WikiProject: Wikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America,
This page categorizes pages using assessment grades, through built-in transclusion from {{NorthAmNative}}.
Information on Grading Scheme
Class | Criteria | Reader's experience | Editing suggestions | Example |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
The article has attained featured article status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured article candidates. More detailed criteria
The article meets the featured article criteria:
A featured article exemplifies Wikipedia's very best work and is distinguished by professional standards of writing, presentation, and sourcing. In addition to meeting the policies regarding content for all Wikipedia articles, it has the following attributes.
|
Professional, outstanding, and thorough; a definitive source for encyclopedic information. | No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible. | Cleopatra (as of June 2018) |
![]() |
The article has attained featured list status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured list candidates. More detailed criteria
The article meets the featured list criteria:
|
Professional standard; it comprehensively covers the defined scope, usually providing a complete set of items, and has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about those items. | No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible. | List of dates predicted for apocalyptic events (as of May 2018) |
![]() |
The article is well organized and essentially complete, having been examined by impartial reviewers from a WikiProject or elsewhere. Good article status is not a requirement for A-Class. More detailed criteria
The article meets the A-Class criteria:
Provides a well-written, clear and complete description of the topic, as described in Wikipedia:Article development. It should be of a length suitable for the subject, appropriately structured, and be well referenced by a broad array of reliable sources. It should be well illustrated, with no copyright problems. Only minor style issues and other details need to be addressed before submission as a featured article candidate. See the A-Class assessment departments of some of the larger WikiProjects (e.g. WikiProject Military history). |
Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject would typically find nothing wanting. | Expert knowledge may be needed to tweak the article, and style problems may need solving. WP:Peer review may help. | Battle of Nam River (as of June 2014) |
![]() |
The article meets all of the good article criteria, and has been examined by one or more impartial reviewers from WP:Good article nominations. More detailed criteria
A good article is:
|
Useful to nearly all readers, with no obvious problems; approaching (though not necessarily equalling) the quality of a professional publication. | Some editing by subject and style experts is helpful; comparison with an existing featured article on a similar topic may highlight areas where content is weak or missing. | Discovery of the neutron (as of April 2019) |
B | The article meets all of the B-Class criteria. It is mostly complete and does not have major problems, but requires some further work to reach good article standards. More detailed criteria
|
Readers are not left wanting, although the content may not be complete enough to satisfy a serious student or researcher. | A few aspects of content and style need to be addressed. Expert knowledge may be needed. The inclusion of supporting materials should be considered if practical, and the article checked for general compliance with the Manual of Style and related style guidelines. | Psychology (as of January 2024) |
C | The article is substantial but is still missing important content or contains irrelevant material. The article should have some references to reliable sources, but may still have significant problems or require substantial cleanup. More detailed criteria
The article cites more than one reliable source and is better developed in style, structure, and quality than Start-Class, but it fails one or more of the criteria for B-Class. It may have some gaps or missing elements, or need editing for clarity, balance, or flow.
|
Useful to a casual reader, but would not provide a complete picture for even a moderately detailed study. | Considerable editing is needed to close gaps in content and solve cleanup problems. | Wing (as of June 2018) |
Start | An article that is developing but still quite incomplete. It may or may not cite adequate reliable sources. More detailed criteria
The article has a meaningful amount of good content, but it is still weak in many areas. The article has one or more of the following:
|
Provides some meaningful content, but most readers will need more. | Providing references to reliable sources should come first; the article also needs substantial improvement in content and organisation. Also improve the grammar, spelling, writing style and improve the jargon use. | Ball (as of September 2014) |
Stub | A very basic description of the topic. Meets none of the Start-Class criteria. | Provides very little meaningful content; may be little more than a dictionary definition. Readers probably see insufficiently developed features of the topic and may not see how the features of the topic are significant. | Any editing or additional material can be helpful. The provision of meaningful content should be a priority. The best solution for a Stub-class Article to step up to a Start-class Article is to add in referenced reasons of why the topic is significant. | Lineage (anthropology) (as of December 2014) |
List | Meets the criteria of a stand-alone list or set index article, which is an article that contains primarily a list, usually consisting of links to articles in a particular subject area. | There is no set format for a list, but its organization should be logical and useful to the reader. | Lists should be lists of live links to Wikipedia articles, appropriately named and organized. | List of literary movements |
Note: We have non standard grades (as well as those listed above) for merge, delete, AfD etc., see Codes and meanings.
For a list of articles so classified, see: quality log and quality statistics.
Pages in category "B-Class Indigenous peoples of North America articles"
The following 200 pages are in this category, out of approximately 739 total. This list may not reflect recent changes.
(previous page) (next page)0–9
A
- Talk:A Snake Falls to Earth
- Talk:Jim Abeita
- Talk:Aboriginal title
- Talk:Aboriginal title in New York
- Talk:Aboriginal title in the United States
- Talk:Accokeek Creek Site
- Talk:Acoma Pueblo
- Talk:Acorus calamus
- Talk:William Penn Adair
- Talk:Hank Adams
- Talk:Willie Adams (politician)
- Talk:Agua Dulce people
- Talk:Jeri Ah-be-hill
- Talk:David Ahenakew
- Talk:Ahtahkakoop
- Talk:Z. Susanne Aikman
- Talk:Alabama Creole people
- Talk:Alabama people
- Talk:Alabama–Coushatta Tribe of Texas
- Talk:Alaska Native corporation
- Talk:Alaska Native religion
- Talk:William Alchesay
- Talk:Algonquin people
- Talk:Betsy Love Allen
- Talk:Alpine Elementary School (Alpine, Arizona)
- Talk:American Girl
- Talk:American Revolutionary War
- Talk:Ancestral Puebloans
- Talk:Anishinaabe
- Talk:Antelope Creek phase
- Talk:Antelope Hills expedition
- Talk:Apache
- Talk:Apache Christ
- Talk:Apalachee
- Talk:Apple: Skin to the Core
- Talk:Arnaq
- Talk:Asheville, North Carolina
- Talk:Atanarjuat: The Fast Runner
- Talk:Atlanta Braves tomahawk chop and name controversy
- Talk:Attack at Ament's Cabin
- Talk:Azayamankawin
- Talk:Aztalan State Park
B
- Talk:Badlands National Park
- Talk:Frederic Baraga
- Talk:Bob Barker
- Talk:Battle of Beecher Island
- Talk:Battle of Birch Coulee
- Talk:Battle of Blue Licks
- Talk:Battle of Echoee
- Talk:Battle of Fallen Timbers
- Talk:Battle of Frenchtown
- Talk:Battle of Galudoghson
- Talk:Battle of Julesburg
- Talk:Battle of Killdeer Mountain
- Talk:Battle of Little Robe Creek
- Talk:Battle of Plum Creek
- Talk:Battle of Sideling Hill
- Talk:Battle of Sorel
- Talk:Battle of Stony Lake
- Talk:Battle of the North Fork of the Red River
- Talk:Battle of the Washita River
- Talk:Battle of Whitestone Hill
- Talk:Bdóte
- Talk:Carl Beam
- Talk:Bear River Massacre
- Talk:Beaver Wars
- Talk:Beothuk
- Talk:Solomon Bibo
- Talk:Josie Billie
- Talk:Black Bear (chief)
- Talk:Black Hawk (Sauk leader)
- Talk:Black Seminoles
- Talk:Black-on-black ware
- Talk:Blackfeet Nation
- Talk:John Boncore
- Talk:George Bonga
- Talk:Braddock Expedition
- Talk:Braiding Sweetgrass
- Talk:Jean de Brébeuf
- Talk:Jack Brisco
- Talk:British Band
- Talk:British colonization of the Americas
- Talk:Ramy Brooks
- Talk:David M. Brugge
- Talk:Buchanan's Station
- Talk:Buckskin Brigades
- Talk:Buffalo Hump
- Talk:Buffalo Soldier
- Talk:Charles Henry Byce
C
- Talk:Cades Pond culture
- Talk:Caesars Southern Indiana
- Talk:Cahokia
- Talk:Cahokia Woodhenge
- Talk:Calusa
- Talk:Canada (AG) v Lavell
- Talk:Canadian Aboriginal syllabics
- Talk:Canadian Indian residential school gravesites
- Talk:Rock music of Canada
- Talk:Carlisle Indian Industrial School
- Talk:Lewis Cass
- Talk:Carlos Castaneda
- Talk:Caste War of Yucatán
- Talk:Catawba people
- Talk:Catholic Church and the Age of Discovery
- Talk:Cayuga Indian Nation of New York v. Pataki
- Talk:Ceramics of Indigenous peoples of the Americas
- Talk:Chacato
- Talk:Chaco Culture National Historical Park
- Talk:Chaloklowa Chickasaw
- Talk:Joba Chamberlain
- Talk:Martin Chartier
- Talk:Peter Chartier
- Talk:Hiram Chase
- Talk:Cherokee
- Talk:Cherokee Commission
- Talk:Cherokee freedmen controversy
- Talk:Cherokee funeral rites
- Talk:Cherokee history
- Talk:Cherokee Nation
- Talk:Cheyenne
- Talk:Cheyenne language
- Talk:Cherokee–American wars
- Talk:Chief Illiniwek
- Talk:Chief Seattle's speech
- Talk:Chief Wahoo
- Talk:Espíritu Chijulla
- Talk:Chilhowee (Cherokee town)
- Talk:Brian Ching
- Talk:Choctaw
- Talk:Chota (Cherokee town)
- Talk:Church Rock uranium mill spill
- Talk:Edward Eugene Claplanhoo
- Talk:Gerald Clarke (artist)
- Talk:Clarksville, Tennessee
- Talk:Clearing the Plains
- Talk:Cleveland Indigenous activism
- Talk:Clovis culture
- Talk:Chief Black Coal
- Talk:Coast Miwok
- Talk:Coast Salish
- Talk:Code talker
- Talk:Coeur d'Alene War
- Talk:John Collier (sociologist)
- Talk:Colonoware
- Talk:Colorado War
- Talk:Comanche
- Talk:Madam La Compt
- Talk:Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes
- Talk:Lyda Conley
- Talk:Constance Lake First Nation
- Talk:Sherman Coolidge
- Talk:Cornplanter
- Talk:Cornstalk
- Talk:Belva Cottier
- Talk:Council House Fight
- Talk:Crazy Horse
- Talk:Crazy Horse Memorial
- Talk:Cree
- Talk:Bula Croker
- Talk:Marcia Crosby
- Talk:Crow Flies High
- Talk:Crow people
- Talk:Cultural assimilation of Native Americans
- Talk:Edward S. Curtis
- Talk:Custaloga
- Talk:George Armstrong Custer
D
- Talk:Daisy Cave
- Talk:Dakota War of 1862
- Talk:Dartmouth College
- Talk:Dorothy Davids
- Talk:Dean R. Snow
- Talk:Nora Thompson Dean
- Talk:Angie Debo
- Talk:Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples
- Talk:Delaware languages
- Talk:Delgamuukw v British Columbia
- Talk:Ella Cara Deloria
- Talk:Jack Dempsey
- Talk:Denial of genocides of Indigenous peoples
- Talk:Jim Denomie
- Talk:Médard des Groseilliers
- Talk:Lena Frank Dick
- Talk:Diné Bahaneʼ
- Talk:Dohasan
- Talk:Sophia Durant
- Talk:Duro v. Reina