data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5472c/5472c7af6ca87b93460930a960e66bd030cdf711" alt=""
Welcome to WikiProject Comics, a project formed by Wikipedians to increase, expand, improve, and better organize articles related to comics in Wikipedia, the largest encyclopedia in the world! We rely on comics enthusiasts worldwide to make this the best comics encyclopaedia on the web. If you are interested in participating, why not see how you can get involved?
If you would like to help, please inquire on the talk page and see the to-do list there.
For more information on WikiProjects, please see Wikipedia:WikiProjects and Wikipedia:WikiProject best practices.
Scope
The scope of WikiProject Comics is improve the vast expanse of knowledge that comics have become. This WikiProject will attempt to cover all comics-related information included on Wikipedia. We will do this through volunteer contributors and editors. If you are interested in joining the WikiProject, please feel free to add your name to the Participants list below, and find yourself an article to adopt.
WikiProject Comics |
---|
Information |
Comics Portal |
Alerts
Did you know
- 02 Feb 2025 – House of Slay (talk · edit · hist) was nominated for DYK by Cielquiparle (t · c); see discussion
- 28 Jan 2025 – Marvel Cinematic Universe: Phase Two (talk · edit · hist) was nominated for DYK by ZooBlazer (t · c); see discussion
- 23 Jan 2025 – Point the Finger (talk · edit · hist) was nominated for DYK by Viriditas (t · c); see discussion
Articles for deletion
- 18 Feb 2025 – Luna Snow (talk · edit · hist) was AfDed by Kung Fu Man (t · c); see discussion (6 participants)
- 17 Feb 2025 – Toby the Tram Engine (talk · edit · hist) was AfDed by Piotrus (t · c); see discussion (5 participants)
- 14 Feb 2025 – Harry Kloor (talk · edit · hist) was AfDed by PlotinusEnjoyer (t · c); see discussion (7 participants; relisted)
- 13 Feb 2025 – Ravencroft (talk · edit · hist) was AfDed by Piotrus (t · c); see discussion (7 participants; relisted)
- 12 Feb 2025 – Batcycle (talk · edit · hist) was AfDed by Piotrus (t · c); see discussion (4 participants; relisted)
- 12 Feb 2025 – Supermobile (talk · edit · hist) was AfDed by Piotrus (t · c); see discussion (5 participants; relisted)
- 12 Feb 2025 – Features of Spider-Man media (talk · edit · hist) was AfDed by Piotrus (t · c); see discussion (9 participants; relisted)
- 10 Feb 2025 – Buzz (DC Thomson) (talk · edit · hist) was AfDed by QuietHere (t · c); see discussion (3 participants; relisted)
- 01 Feb 2025 – List of boats in The Adventures of Tintin (talk · edit · hist) was AfDed by Piotrus (t · c); see discussion (9 participants; relisted)
- 31 Jan 2025 – George DiCaprio (talk · edit · hist) was AfDed by Jolielover (t · c); see discussion (7 participants; relisted)
- (7 more...)
Proposed deletions
- 10 Feb 2025 – Player Who Can't Level Up (talk · edit · hist) PRODed by Seefooddiet (t · c) was deleted
Categories for discussion
- 20 Feb 2025 – Category:The Adventures of Tintin location redirects (talk · edit · hist) was CfDed by Fram (t · c); see discussion
- 14 Feb 2025 – Category:Characters created by Tony Isabella (talk · edit · hist) was CfDed by Alxeedo (t · c); see discussion
Redirects for discussion
- 17 Feb 2025 – Belladonna (Narda Ravanna) (talk · edit · hist) →List of Marvel Comics characters: B was RfDed by Trade (t · c); see discussion
- 02 Feb 2025 – A: AOU (talk · edit · hist) →Avengers: Age of Ultron was RfDed by ZooBlazer (t · c); see discussion
- 21 Jan 2025 – Dormammu, I've come to bargain (talk · edit · hist) →Doctor Strange (2016 film) was RfDed by Utopes (t · c); see discussion
Files for discussion
- 13 Feb 2025 – File:Sinfest 2024-12-20.png (talk · edit · hist) (on Sinfest) was FfDed by Traumnovelle (t · c); see discussion
Miscellany for deletion
- 19 Feb 2025 – Draft:Spider-Man 4: Fan Film (talk · edit · hist) was MfDed by SilviaASH (t · c); see discussion
Featured article candidates
- 02 Feb 2025 – Black Widow (Natasha Romanova) (talk · edit · hist) was FA nominated by Thebiguglyalien (t · c); see discussion
Good article nominees
- 18 Feb 2025 – Invincible season 2 (talk · edit · hist) was GA nominated by Afrowriter (t · c); start discussion
- 05 Feb 2025 – The Batman (film) (talk · edit · hist) was GA nominated by Trailblazer101 (t · c); start discussion
- 03 Feb 2025 – Deadpool & Wolverine (talk · edit · hist) was GA nominated by Adamstom.97 (t · c); start discussion
- 01 Feb 2025 – The Whole World Is Watching (The Falcon and the Winter Soldier) (talk · edit · hist) was GA nominated by Dcdiehardfan (t · c); start discussion
- 19 Jan 2025 – Luke Cage (talk · edit · hist) was GA nominated by Thebiguglyalien (t · c); start discussion
- 17 Nov 2024 – Marvel Studios (talk · edit · hist) was GA nominated by Trailblazer101 (t · c); start discussion
- 19 Oct 2024 – Daredevil (Marvel Comics character) (talk · edit · hist) was GA nominated by Wrangler1981 (t · c); start discussion
- 12 Feb 2025 – Blue Beetle (film) (talk · edit · hist) GA nominated by Yovt (t · c) was closed
- 08 Feb 2025 – X-Men: God Loves, Man Kills (talk · edit · hist) GA nominated by Thebiguglyalien (t · c) was promoted by ImaginesTigers (t · c), see discussion
Good topic candidates
- 28 Jan 2025 – Marvel Cinematic Universe: Phase Two (talk · edit · hist) was GT nominated by ZooBlazer (t · c); see discussion
The topic includes: Iron Man 3, Thor: The Dark World, Captain America: The Winter Soldier, Avengers: Age of Ultron, Guardians of the Galaxy (film), Ant-Man (film)
Featured article reviews
- 21 Jan 2025 – Alien vs. Predator (film) (talk · edit · hist) was put up for FA review by Fathoms Below (t · c); see discussion
Good article reassessments
- 04 Feb 2025 – The Sandman (comic book) (talk · edit · hist) was nominated for GA reassessment by Z1720 (t · c); see discussion
- 01 Jan 2025 – Green Lantern (film) (talk · edit · hist) was nominated for GA reassessment by Sgubaldo (t · c); see discussion
Requests for comments
- 30 Jan 2025 – Sinfest (talk · edit · hist) has an RfC by Le Blue Dude (t · c); see discussion
Peer reviews
- 27 Jan 2025 – Wonder Woman (2017 film) (talk · edit · hist) has been put up for PR by Lililolol (t · c); see discussion
Requested moves
- 17 Feb 2025 – Captain Marvel (DC Comics) (talk · edit · hist) is requested to be moved to Shazam (DC Comics) by Toa Nidhiki05 (t · c); see discussion
- 06 Feb 2025 – Wolves at the Gate (talk · edit · hist) move request to Wolves at the Gate (comics) by Aoba47 (t · c) was closed by Sophisticatedevening (t · c) on 16 Feb 2025; see discussion
- 16 Jan 2025 – Rewriting Extinction (talk · edit · hist) move request to Rewriting Earth by PersonDoingSomeEditing (t · c) was moved by Extraordinary Writ (t · c) on 15 Feb 2025; see discussion
Articles to be merged
- 06 Feb 2025 – Sin (DC Comics) (talk · edit · hist) is proposed for merging to List of DC Comics characters: S by QuietHere (t · c); see discussion
- 17 Jan 2025 – List of DC Extended Universe cast members (talk · edit · hist) is proposed for merging to Characters of the DC Extended Universe by Lililolol (t · c); see discussion
- 18 Dec 2024 – Latveria (talk · edit · hist) is proposed for merging to Doctor Doom by Jontesta (t · c); see discussion
- 11 Oct 2024 – Publication history of Dick Grayson (talk · edit · hist) is proposed for merging to Nightwing by Lililolol (t · c); see discussion
- 05 Oct 2024 – Spider-Girl (comic book) (talk · edit · hist) is proposed for merging to Spider-Girl by Lililolol (t · c); see discussion
- 13 Sep 2024 – Kid Flash (talk · edit · hist) is proposed for merging to Flash (DC Comics character) by Lililolol (t · c); see discussion
Articles to be split
- 16 Feb 2025 – Thomas Ian Griffith (talk · edit · hist) is proposed for splitting by Bricks&Wood (t · c); see discussion
- 21 Jan 2025 – Champions (2016 team) (talk · edit · hist) is proposed for splitting by Googabbagabba (t · c); see discussion
- 25 Dec 2024 – Marten Toonder (talk · edit · hist) is proposed for splitting by Roastedbeanz1 (t · c); see discussion
- 21 Nov 2024 – The Superior Spider-Man (talk · edit · hist) is proposed for splitting by Toscahydra (t · c); see discussion
- 08 Sep 2024 – Krypto the Superdog (talk · edit · hist) is proposed for splitting by 2601:1C1:837F:EFE0:B163:28F6:351C:6E2F (t · c); see discussion
- 14 Aug 2024 – Kingsman (comic series) (talk · edit · hist) is proposed for splitting by Zaha Gropius (t · c); see discussion
- 12 Jun 2023 – List of Arrow characters (talk · edit · hist) is proposed for splitting by OlifanofmrTennant (t · c); see discussion
- 02 Nov 2022 – Johnny Thunder (talk · edit · hist) is proposed for splitting by Rtkat3 (t · c); see discussion
- 24 Aug 2022 – Giant-Man (talk · edit · hist) is proposed for splitting by Rtkat3 (t · c); see discussion
- 31 May 2022 – Batman Returns (video games) (talk · edit · hist) is proposed for splitting by Cat's Tuxedo (t · c); see discussion
Articles for creation
- 18 Feb 2025 – Draft:The Flash (1990 film) (talk · edit · hist) has been submitted for AfC by Chance997 (t · c)
- 13 Feb 2025 – Draft:Dogu Publishing (talk · edit · hist) has been submitted for AfC by JulesExplainsItAll (t · c)
- 06 Feb 2025 – Draft:Grant Sputore (second draft) (talk · edit · hist) has been submitted for AfC by KemalWorld (t · c)
- 22 Jan 2025 – Draft:Spider-Man: Octopus Girl (talk · edit · hist) has been submitted for AfC by Muhammad Akif Janjua (t · c)
- 09 Dec 2024 – Draft:Rachel Lindsay (cartoonist) (talk · edit · hist) has been submitted for AfC by Rel2111 (t · c)
- 12 Feb 2025 – Draft:Dan Mora (talk · edit · hist) submitted for AfC by Alexvillaloboscaravaca (t · c) was declined by Flat Out (t · c) on 20 Feb 2025
- 04 Feb 2025 – Draft:Global manga (talk · edit · hist) submitted for AfC by VelvetQuill (t · c) was moved to Global manga (talk · edit · hist) by Robert McClenon (t · c) on 18 Feb 2025
- 23 Sep 2024 – Draft:Swamp Thing (Levi Kamei) (talk · edit · hist) submitted for AfC by JayAaerow (t · c) was declined by Pokelego999 (t · c) on 16 Feb 2025
Deletion discussions
- To edit this section, see Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Comics and animation
- Miho (Sin City) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Minor comic character. The usual issues with WP:GNG - article is a plot summary + list of appearances; reception is very short (just two listicles). My BEFORE is of no help. WP:ATD-R gives us a plausible target: List of Sin City characters. (If anyone is interested in this series, note I've justed PRODed a bunch of characters/organizations; others will be nominated for AfD - right now I am not seeing any GNG for anything fictional from Template:Sin City. Feel free to deprod and redirect stuff to the list of characters, of course (or we can discuss them here). I am bringing Miho to AfD to notify folks interested in this (and also because she has the most references out of all of the Sin City articles, so it seems she is the 'best' out of this sorry bunch of, let's face it, WP:FANCRUFT). Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 11:31, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements, Science fiction and fantasy, and Comics and animation. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 11:31, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:32, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
- Roxxon Energy Corporation (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fictional company from the Marvel Universe. Fails WP:GNG (just the usual plot summary and list of appearances; no reception). My BEFORE failed to find anything substantial. Per WP:ATD-R, could redirect (merge?) to Features of the Marvel Universe. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 11:20, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements, Science fiction and fantasy, and Comics and animation. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 11:20, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NOT without significant coverage in reliable independent sources. Could be redirected to Marvel Universe, per WP:ATD. Shooterwalker (talk) 19:32, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
- Keep if more sources are found, otherwise merge to Features of the Marvel Universe. BOZ (talk) 01:42, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
- Cross Technological Enterprises (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fictional company most prominently related to Ant-Man. Fails WP:GNG (just the usual plot summary and list of appearances; no reception). My BEFORE failed to find anything substantial. Per WP:ATD-R, could redirect (merge?) to Features of the Marvel Universe or Darren Cross (fictional founder, has its own article)? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 11:18, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements, Science fiction and fantasy, and Comics and animation. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 11:18, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
- Delete or redirect to Ant-Man. Without reception from reliable independent sources, it fails WP:GNG and WP:NOT. Shooterwalker (talk) 19:30, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
- Alchemax (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fictional company from Spider Man universe. Fails WP:GNG (just the usual plot summary and list of appearances; no reception). My BEFORE failed to find anything substantial. Per WP:ATD-R, could redirect (merge?) to Features of Spider-Man media if that article is kept (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Features of Spider-Man media); otherwise perhaps to (recently kept) Features of the Marvel Universe? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 11:16, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements, Science fiction and fantasy, and Comics and animation. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 11:16, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Without reception from reliable independent sources, this fails WP:GNG and other fundamental policies like WP:NOT. A redirect and mention might be an WP:ATD, and I am neutral on the target. Shooterwalker (talk) 19:29, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
- Parker Industries (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fictional company from Spider Man universe. Fails WP:GNG (just the usual plot summary and list of appearances; reception limited to two listicles). My BEFORE failed to find anything substantial. Per WP:ATD-R, could redirect (merge?) to Features of Spider-Man media if that article is kept (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Features of Spider-Man media); otherwise perhaps to (recently kept) Features of the Marvel Universe? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 11:15, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements, Science fiction and fantasy, and Comics and animation. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 11:15, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
- Luna Snow (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
So after discovering this article, I wanted to do a hard dive into sources on it. However, upon digging...there's really next to nothing. Several articles are addressing the fact people thought she was a new character in Marvel Rivals, but they are carbon copies of one another: explaining the character's origin and usage, with no reception or discussion about her as a character itself. This article from Polygon felt like the strongest source, and what got my interest piqued to check for more, but even it barely discusses her, and is more about Iron Fist's redesign and Rivals.
Scholar also turned up nothing. She's a character in a vacuum, and while I'd rather be proven wrong I just can't find anything through a thorough WP:BEFORE to indicate she's notable. Kung Fu Man (talk) 15:49, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements, Video games, and Comics and animation. Kung Fu Man (talk) 15:49, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
- I have no immediate comment on deletion yet, but I am opening the possibility of a list of Marvel Rivals characters (comparable to the Overwatch one) given that they have spoken about including less well-known characters from the Marvel cannon, where notability outside of the game is unlikely. Most of the heroes in Rivals are notable before the game (even Jeff) but I am sure we'll see more. — Masem (t) 16:02, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
- I don't know if a list is really necessary compared to a table in the game's article for now, but once the cast grows I could see it as a good idea to do such a list.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 16:06, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
- I think that there is enough coverage of heroes as in the game to do a list with two paragraphs for each, one briefly summarizing the Canon of the character, and a second to cover their skill kit, as is done for the Overwatch ones. Judging by how the new heroes have been covered. This would also recent excessive game details on the individual char articles. But still thinking this through. — Masem (t) 20:19, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- I don't know if a list is really necessary compared to a table in the game's article for now, but once the cast grows I could see it as a good idea to do such a list.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 16:06, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
- Weak keep [1] [2] [3] [4] (game guides can still qualify as SIGCOV as long as the article itself is not) as well as the other sources shown in the article, make me feel like this character is probably notable on her own. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 16:31, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
- Keep - There is sufficient coverage such as MSN, DEXERTO, Kotaku, Polygon, TechRadar etc. Drushrush (talk) 16:38, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
- The first source is useless, it's a short note about fans of a niche game being upset about a price of a cosmetic item featuring her. It has nothing to do with her outside her being part of the said cosmetic. Second source is a bit longer but again, it focuses on mechanics of her character in a game, it's mostly useless for us. Third is more reliable and longer but it is still about her video game character in that particular game. Fourth is again about the game, but it is reliable and it goes beyond mechanics to discuss some cultural stuff. Fifth is a review of the cosmetic. Sigh. I am sorry, but those sources are not about Luna Snow, they are about Luna Snow (Marvel Rivals character). If this is all we have, then sadly, we cannot warrant keeping an article on her, but we could write up an article on the video game version of her character. Weird, I know... --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:33, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
- Keep: as per 4 sources above. AgerJoy talk 18:32, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
- Comment @Drushrush: @Zxcvbnm: @AgerJoy: While gameguide material can be used to establish character notability, it still needs to assert some importance outside of the game itself i.e. players being attacked for using Symmetra in Overwatch for how poor hers was or outright using her a troll pick to frustrate players. None of that is indicated here. There is also next to no discussion of the character as a fictional character outside of the Polygon article above, which is what we should be aiming for first and foremost. One needs to consider what the sources are saying for WP:SIGCOV, not that they simply exist.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 00:50, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- Merge. I do my best to look for any angle to justify an article's creation, but here, I find it uncompelling that all the sources are a combination of game guide discussion and/or offer limited commentary. I don't think it's a weak article situation, I've seen worse, but I would be more comfortable if there were stronger articles to cite. - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 01:05, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- Redirect (and/or merge) per my analysis of sources above. What we have is mostly about video game character, not about the comic book character... --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:33, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
- Toby the Tram Engine (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Dubious stand-alone WP:GNG (my BEFORE also failed to find anything except a passing mention here and there). No reception or analysis, the only non-plot content is found the the "Prototype and backstory" but it seems to be cobbled from WP:SIGCOV-failing mentions, mostly by the show's creator; and it is padded by general history of the real world J70 tram engine (aka GER Class C53). Per ATD I recommend redirecting this to List of characters in The Railway Series; perhaps with a merge of few relevant sentences from the non-plot section. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 00:44, 17 February 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements, Science fiction and fantasy, Television, Transportation, and United Kingdom. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 00:44, 17 February 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Literature and Comics and animation. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:47, 17 February 2025 (UTC)
- Keep: notability and popularity of this article is attested by the large number of pages linking to it (see 'What links here'). Redirecting to List of characters in The Railway Series would necessarily obliterate virtually all of the content.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Mean as custard (talk • contribs) 06:52, February 19, 2025 (UTC)
- I am afraid this argument, a variation of WP:GOOGLEHITS (but on Wikipedia) is not going to get much traction - our standards are much higher than 10-15 years ago where such arguments were considered valid. See WP:ITSPOPULAR. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 05:25, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- Keep: notability and popularity of this article is attested by the large number of pages linking to it (see 'What links here'). Redirecting to List of characters in The Railway Series would necessarily obliterate virtually all of the content.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Mean as custard (talk • contribs) 06:52, February 19, 2025 (UTC)
- Keep per above. This character is perhaps the most recognizable in the series after Thomas. Use of primary references, while raising eyebrows, doesn't necessitate deletion. I do agree with you that this page could use a cleanup though to remove some of the fluff. Kylemahar902 (talk) 22:40, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
- Redirect per nom. Wikipedia links aren't an indicator of notability, and neither are subjective assessments like "recognizability". Astaire (talk) 03:55, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
- Delete or redirect Without secondary references, this there is no way to meet the WP:GNG (let alone basic rules like WP:RS, WP:V, WP:OR, and WP:NPOV). There is a character list, as an WP:ATD. Shooterwalker (talk) 20:07, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
- Harry Kloor (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Reads a lot like a resume, tangentially mentioned in a few RS. Article may have been made for payment. PlotinusEnjoyer (talk) 19:18, 14 February 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. PlotinusEnjoyer (talk) 19:18, 14 February 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Authors, Businesspeople, Science fiction and fantasy, Television, Comics and animation, Science, Indiana, and Oregon. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 21:15, 14 February 2025 (UTC)
- Keep. Making an accusation that the creator of the article, MichaelQSchmidt, a Wikipedia Administrator with over 61,000 non-automated edits, is an undisclosed paid editor is a pretty bold statement. Aside from that, the subject of the article meets WP:CREATIVE #3 for his role as producer, co-director, and writer of Quantum Quest: A Cassini Space Odyssey and possibly for Earth: Final Conflict but I haven't been able to independently verify his involvement in that series (but I haven't tried very hard). RecycledPixels (talk) 22:52, 14 February 2025 (UTC)
- Comment: The tone is promotional, but if one is going to claim paid advertising, then one needs to prove it. The issue is whether the tone can be fixed by ordinary editing. That's all. Bearian (talk) 05:19, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
- Comment as nominator- the article has had the banner claiming it was made for payment since 2022. I had assumed that there was some official process that determines that; I am a new editor. I don't claim to have evidence that the article was paid for: I mean no harm to MichaelQSchmidt. PlotinusEnjoyer (talk) 04:16, 16 February 2025 (UTC)
- Comment - Live and learn. Here's what happened, and a good learning curve on this one. The article was created in 2008. It wasn't until 2022 that it was tagged for possible paid editing. With a gap of 14 years, how would anyone know it was paid editing? You see, when articles get tagged for anything, and without any backup proof, a tag is just a tag unless there is some proof. — Maile (talk) 03:03, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
- Allow me, please, to disagree with your observation about the importance of the length of time, i.e. "With a gap of 14 years, how would anyone know it was paid editing?" Well, information does not necessarily appear quickly. We might learn an article was made by a paid editor, or some other pertinent information, a considerable length of time after the article's creation, something for which I believe no examples need be given. Take care. -The Gnome (talk) 16:38, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
- I might also add that anyone can slap a tag on an article. They don't have to prove the tag is correct, or that they even know why they are tagging. Just tag it. — Maile (talk) 03:18, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:17, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
- Keep Creative career clearly pushes subject above WP:N easily, and the claim the article was created and paid for by the subject is based on...one drive-by IP post in 2022, with @MrOllie: needing to explain why they tagged it in August of the same year. It's an accusation so poor nobody commented on it because they presented no evidence for it at all. After your poor Chanel and Travel Portland noms and this removed vote!, Plotinus, I strongly suggest doing more in article space right now because your nominations and rationales are baffling. Nathannah•(chatter) 01:22, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
- The template says 'created or edited' and that is the case here - there's been a promotional SPA active on it for years - as is common in these cases, it is photo rights on their uploads that tell the tale. It's not based on an IP post, and I did not have MichaelQSchmidt in mind. - MrOllie (talk) 01:27, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
- I worked out which account's edits you were responding to. ☺ Uncle G (talk) 01:53, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
- It was commented on. Uncle G (talk) 01:53, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
- The template says 'created or edited' and that is the case here - there's been a promotional SPA active on it for years - as is common in these cases, it is photo rights on their uploads that tell the tale. It's not based on an IP post, and I did not have MichaelQSchmidt in mind. - MrOllie (talk) 01:27, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
- Delete since subject despite the avalanche of citations, the supporting material does not stand up to close scrutiny. Scalpel, please.
- Forensics: We can all agree that our subject is the first to obtain a double doctorate, per All the News That's Fit to Print, and by some obscure Russian website, for good measure - though, we must discard the dead links about that double doctorate stuff, such as this Arizona roadkill.
- What else do we have? We have listings on a general theme, in which our subject is mentioned, such as this list of alumni, or routine listings of events, e.g. of speaking appearances, such as this; plus, news items that are similarly about something else and not of our subject, e.g. this report about an upcoming movie, whose screenplay is written by Kloor (mentioned once), or this one about a NASA project where our subject is listed as "workshop attendee", or a Captain's Log entry on a "Star Trek interactive science exhibit" where our subject is name dropped once, and so on. Anything else trawled up belongs to the aforepresented categories.
- The strong aroma of vanity, whether intentional or not, is not a problem. After all, anyone can see there is no need for two photo-portraits or that we do not get year of birth. Nor is the fact that a major curator of the text is a kamikaze account. The problem is that we do not have enough sources. And arguments to the tune "Oh, he's obviously notable" do not wash. -The Gnome (talk) 16:38, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
- Ravencroft (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fictional prison from Marvel/Spiderman verse. Pure plot summary and list of appearances. No reception, analysis, etc. The topic also has a section in Features of Spider-Man media (a problematic article that is currently discussed in its own AfD). I doubt we need even a single mention of this on Wikipedia outside a plot summary in some Spider-Man arc or comic; we certainly don't need two. This could be ATD-R to the mentioned article, but IMHO that one should be deleted as well, so... shrug. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:16, 13 February 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements, Science fiction and fantasy, and Comics and animation. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:16, 13 February 2025 (UTC)
- Redirect to Features of Spider-Man media. Though that article is up for AfD right now, the content will likely be merged to another article if merged, or kept around if kept, so I'm comfortable leaving a redirect here. Features of the Marvel Universe is also a decent merge target should that article be kept, but it's a bit up in the air right now given all these AfDs are active at the same time. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 02:59, 13 February 2025 (UTC)
- Merge/Redirect I think we this we should wait with this discussion on the results of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Features of Spider-Man media and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Features of the Marvel Universe, both potential merge targets. Both are covering this topic. But they could benefit from some references here. This ScreenRant article, while not establishing notability, has relevant commentary to show that this topic can be covered beyond just plot-summary and real-world appearances. Daranios (talk) 11:15, 13 February 2025 (UTC)
- Comment - If you want this discussion to wait until the previously mentioned AFD debates have concluded, why do you have merge/redirect verdict instead of a suggestion the Delay the AFD verdict or something like that? --Rtkat3 (talk) 02:09, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
- I don't presume to speak for Daranios who I am sure will correct me if I am wrong, but I am assuming they agree the nominating topic is not notable and should be merged/redirect somewhere, with the best target being in the air for now, depending on whether the other mentioned article or articles survives the AfD or not. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:19, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
- @Rtkat3: I would prefer to wait with the decision until we know the result of the other AfDs. I just thought I cannot be sure if a closer will follow my request, so a selective merge as described would be my opinion if I am forced to decide now. Does that make sense? Or is there a different suggested procedure for such a case? Daranios (talk) 17:32, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
- The AFD for Features of the Marvel Universe has already closed due to an amount of keeps it received. --Rtkat3 (talk) 17:38, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
- It's weird: The AfD has been reinstated, but with no trace of the intervening closure. Well, let's see what happens there. Daranios (talk) 16:08, 17 February 2025 (UTC)
- The AFD for Features of the Marvel Universe has already closed due to an amount of keeps it received. --Rtkat3 (talk) 17:38, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
- @Rtkat3: I would prefer to wait with the decision until we know the result of the other AfDs. I just thought I cannot be sure if a closer will follow my request, so a selective merge as described would be my opinion if I am forced to decide now. Does that make sense? Or is there a different suggested procedure for such a case? Daranios (talk) 17:32, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
- Comment - If you want this discussion to wait until the previously mentioned AFD debates have concluded, why do you have merge/redirect verdict instead of a suggestion the Delay the AFD verdict or something like that? --Rtkat3 (talk) 02:09, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
- Keep if more worthy sources can be found by other contributors or merge with Features of the Marvel Universe in the spirit of WP:PRESERVE. As mentioned above, the AFD for Features of the Marvel Universe has closed as keep. --Rtkat3 (talk) 16:06, 17 February 2025 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting as we have two different proposed target articles right now. And the correct link to the Marvel AFD is Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Features of the Marvel Universe (3rd nomination).
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 04:07, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
- Merge relevant material to Features of the Marvel Universe, because this is primarily cited to first-party comic refs. Merge to Features of Spider-Man media should that list be retained at AfD. Trailblazer101 (talk) 03:57, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
- Merge to Features of Spider-Man media, for which this article has citations more than substantial enough to be included as a listed item. BD2412 T 18:16, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
- Redirect or merge. Neutral on the target. "Features of Spider-Man media" is up for deletion, and may itself be removed, or merged. This redirect can be changed based on that outcome. Shooterwalker (talk) 20:01, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
- Batcycle (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Pure plot summary and list of apperances; the bit on development is unreferenced and there is no reception, not even any listicles. Fails WP:GNG and my BEFORE failed to find anything that's not a plot summary. Since it's just plot, not seeing what we can do here except merge a few sentences (lead?) to Batman#Technology. (If anyone cares, Batsub was just blodly blanked and redirected looong time ago without any AfD... there was also a Batboat, I think). The concepts are mentioned briefly in the suggested redirect target - that's probably enough for now... Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:20, 12 February 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements, Science fiction and fantasy, and Comics and animation. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:20, 12 February 2025 (UTC)
Mergeto Batman#Technology. There is at least some commentary in secondary sources on individual incarnations: [5], [6], [7], p. 70, [8], [9]. Daranios (talk) 15:39, 12 February 2025 (UTC)
- Merge per Daranios. Some decent hits, but nowhere near enough for a viable article, though viable merge targets exist. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 02:56, 13 February 2025 (UTC)
- Weak keep Per WP:NEXIST. Got SIGCOV in Batman's Arsenal, Batman: The Ultimate Guide as well as an Article on the Batpod. I wouldn't be surprised if there's more out there, given this is Batman. A lack of willingness to perform improvements to an independently notable topic is not an excuse for deletion or merger, which should be done when something is non-notable or massively overlapping. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 16:52, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
- No offense, but these sources are almost entirely plot summary, with the exception of the Batpod, which is dev info that feels more fitting at the respective film's article. Guidebooks really can't help with Wikipedia:SIGCOV, as they're basically wholly plot summary, failing Wikipedia:NOTPLOT, as there's no content in there that shows how the subject has had a real-world impact. You can't even argue that the fact it was included in the guidebook was noteworthy, because the guidebooks include quite literally everything Batman-related, including several subjects deemed non-notable in past AfDs, such as the Batboat mentioned above.
- I will also note that this exact argument (including these exact sources, bar the Batpod one) was used in the Batboat AfD, where it was determined to redirect the article despite the presented coverage. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 17:21, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 02:21, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- Weak keep The appearance history from Batman's Arsenal is really quite impressive. The presented sources have a lot of plot summary, but I believe all sources taken together provide enough material but also enough commentary to have a full article which also fullfills WP:NOTPLOT. Daranios (talk) 16:08, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- Redirect or merge per Pokelego999. We need WP:SIGCOV about this object's reception to form a separate article. I see some mentions, but recapping the plot / appearances is something more appropriate for a fan wiki than Wikipedia, which covers fictional topics in relation to the real world. A merge is a fine WP:ATD if someone wants to pick a target. Shooterwalker (talk) 21:22, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
- Redirect or merge. Zero WP:SIGCOV. 🍕BP!🍕 (🔔) 12:10, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
- Supermobile (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Very minor element of the Superman universe; short article, pure plot summary and list of appearances. Fails WP:GNG. No idea where this could redirect, but always open to consider redirection a viable alternative to hard deletion (closer, please note: if anyone suggests a target, consider me to support it). Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:01, 12 February 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements, Science fiction and fantasy, and Comics and animation. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:01, 12 February 2025 (UTC)
- Reluctant delete unless a merge target can be found. There's not really a good merge target for this. Perhaps to Superman#Merchandising given the one source mentioned here mentions it was used exclusively for that purpose? But even so it'd be a brief sentence. This is an extremely minor universe element, so there's not much to be retained here. If a good merge target is found I'll change my vote to merge, so ping me if something changes. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 02:56, 13 February 2025 (UTC)
- Keep or merge with Superman in the spirit of WP:PRESERVE. We need an equipment or technology section to that page if the Supermobile going to be redirected there as we already know that Batman has a similar section on his page. --Rtkat3 (talk) 02:07, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
- I don't really feel another section is necessary unless Superman has a ton of technology that has discussion. Batman is discussed for a lot of his tech, and much of his tech has coverage. Superman has comparatively less. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 05:22, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
- The only other technology I recall him having is the Phantom Zone Projector, but it didn't have an article and was covered in the Phantom Zone page. --Rtkat3 (talk) 17:40, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
- As an alternative, a section could be added to Fortress of Solitude for things located/stored there. There are more items than one might think.
- That said, I think the best solution might be to Listify Category:DC Comics vehicles (and Category:Marvel Comics vehicles). If you look at AfD right now, several vehicles are up for discussion, and creation of List of DC Comics vehicles and List of Marvel Comics vehicles would resolve most of them, I think. - jc37 22:28, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
- The thing is that most of these have valid redirect targets, and the topics themselves are just non-notable. Supermobile is more of an exception in terms of places we can cover it than the norm. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 19:53, 17 February 2025 (UTC)
- I don't really feel another section is necessary unless Superman has a ton of technology that has discussion. Batman is discussed for a lot of his tech, and much of his tech has coverage. Superman has comparatively less. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 05:22, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 09:01, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- Weak Delete - The Supermobile itself does not pass the WP:GNG, and it is such a minor piece of trivia in the Superman mythos that I feel that actually merging this to an article like the main Superman page would be giving undue coverage to it. Rorshacma (talk) 17:11, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
- Delete per Rorshacma. Does not meet the WP:GNG and the WP:TRIVIALMENTION isn't worth preserving. Shooterwalker (talk) 20:03, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
- Features of Spider-Man media (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Following from Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Features of the Marvel Universe (3rd nomination) and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Features of the Marvel Cinematic Universe, this is the last of those three fictional universe descriptions in a list form. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NLIST; Wikipedia articles are not places for pure plot summaries, and as a list, this is too broad (list of all fictional in-universe concepts related to Spider-Man). PS. Also, on the off chance this is kept, this would need renaming to the list of something format. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 01:50, 12 February 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements, Science fiction and fantasy, Comics and animation, and Lists. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 01:50, 12 February 2025 (UTC) PS. Looking closely, this article is not even an attempt at a comprehensive list; it is just a short but in-depth description of just three entities that would unlikely have survived on their own and were cobbled tougher in attempt to hide from GNG: "Empire State University", "Midtown High School" and "Ravencroft" (prison). The latter currently has a poor stand-alone article, which is not even linked from this fancrufty mess here.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:13, 13 February 2025 (UTC)
- Keep or Merge and consolidate into Spider-Man: While this can definitely be improved upon, I am not leaning as strongly on retaining this one as the others because it could be consolidated into the Spider-Man article with considerable details removed (namely the exhaustive list of school students and faculty). Trailblazer101 (talk) 02:28, 12 February 2025 (UTC)
- @Trailblazer101 I am curious what difference do you see here? I struggle to find any myself. (And on a side note, splitting Marvel and Marvel Cinematic stuff is still puzzling to me, as so much of it is redundant - how about at least merging the two other articles into one?) Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 05:49, 12 February 2025 (UTC)
- The Marvel Comics and MCU are two separate franchises, so a merge is not a viable option there. I'm not sure how the content from this list could be implemented into the Spidey article or to what extent, though I would imagine a trimmed section for related attributes of the character's features from the schools to his web-shooters, costumes, etc. could suffice. Trailblazer101 (talk) 05:51, 12 February 2025 (UTC)
- @Trailblazer101 I am curious what difference do you see here? I struggle to find any myself. (And on a side note, splitting Marvel and Marvel Cinematic stuff is still puzzling to me, as so much of it is redundant - how about at least merging the two other articles into one?) Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 05:49, 12 February 2025 (UTC)
- Keep. This article was created in the first place so we would not need to have separate articles on each school and business associated with Spider-Man (all of which could survive as freestanding articles, given their representation across multiple media over decades). This should have the same outcome as Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Features of the Marvel Cinematic Universe and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Features of the Marvel Universe (3rd nomination), both of which are on track to be kept resoundingly. BD2412 T 01:08, 13 February 2025 (UTC)
- Similar articles regularly get deleted; they have no stand-alone notability (if they had, they'd have their own articles). Adding them to a list is just listcruft. 0+0+0 still equals 0. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:11, 13 February 2025 (UTC)
- There are items listed in this article that already have stand-alone notability, beginning with the Daily Bugle. BD2412 T 02:17, 13 February 2025 (UTC)
- While it may appear that way to you, there are several editors of these comic-related articles who would disagree with that assertion (based on the two other AfDs). Each of these entries could stand as individual articles but were agreed to be merged into this singular list via prior discussions and consensus in those that a singular list would better highlight all of these features related to the character as opposed to being separate articles. There is nothing which precludes such compiled lists from existing, and there are decent sources, with potential for more to be added rather than a complete deletion which would break countless links and leave out much information from this encyclopedia that our readers would be searching for. Trailblazer101 (talk) 02:19, 13 February 2025 (UTC)
- Similar articles regularly get deleted; they have no stand-alone notability (if they had, they'd have their own articles). Adding them to a list is just listcruft. 0+0+0 still equals 0. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:11, 13 February 2025 (UTC)
- Merge and consolidate into Spider-Man per Trailblazer. I was worried this would be some massive pile of information to sift through, but the info in the article is relatively concise. Barring the three locations with pre-existing articles, there are two schools and one prison. These locations contain a lot of unneeded information (Do we really need lists of minor characters without articles?) and can be trimmed quite easily to slot somewhere into the Spider-Man article. All locations, including those with articles, can be mentioned in brief there, with a summary explaining what each location is and why it is important to the Spider-Man mythos. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 02:53, 13 February 2025 (UTC)
- Keep Meets WP:CSC point 2. Jclemens (talk) 08:12, 13 February 2025 (UTC)
- CSC only applies if none meet notability, which is blatantly false when three of the article's entries have their own articles. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 14:01, 14 February 2025 (UTC)
- An all-or-nothing rule seems ill-considered here, given that Wikipedia has tons of lists of instances for which some are notable and have articles while others are not (e.g., List of mayors of Florence). BD2412 T 17:23, 14 February 2025 (UTC)
- Notability of a list is often based on the notability of the subject group. Largely unfamiliar with your hyperlinked article, but an important governmental position is likely to be more covered in sources than a list of fictional locations with no sourcing showcasing real world relevance. Many of the subjects in the list are entirely non-notable, and the subject itself isn't notable, either. Notability should not be inherited from the few locations that are notable, either.
- Also note that CSC 2 says that "Before creating a stand-alone list, consider carefully whether such lists would be better placed within a "parent" article." CSC 2 isn't exactly a blanket keep statement, even if all the subjects fail notability. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 17:49, 14 February 2025 (UTC)
- My reasoning here is that Spider-Man is an article on a specific fictional character, not the entire universe this character occupies, which is separately notable. Although this universe is a subset of the Marvel Comics universe it has locations and characters (many of these separately notable) that arise from it and that are specific to Spider-Man media. This is reflected in fact that there are three separate film franchises, including the 1970s one, around this character and their environs completely unconnected to the MCU or anything else Marvel. Of course, there is also the MCU-adjacent film series, which also reflects the locations and character specific to the Spider-Man universe. Perhaps the title of this article needs to be adjusted to reflect that or the criteria for inclusion of content needs to be clarified, but it will not be at all difficult to demonstrate GNG worthy coverage at this fictional world I've tried with the character itself. BD2412 T 18:46, 14 February 2025 (UTC)
- There is no indication the Universe of Spider-Man is a notable topic either, though. That's my main concern. Regardless of title, this is just a non-notable topic unless sourcing can be shown. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 05:19, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
- Which is why there should be allowed time to find sources to prove whether it is or not, rather than forcing an AfD with inconclusive information. This is something to hash out at the list talk, not here. AfD should be a last resort, not a garbage dumb to prove a point. Trailblazer101 (talk) 05:22, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
- I'm personally of the mind that if it's at AfD, we may as well stick with the discussion while it's here, but I see your point. Decided to do a quick source run to double check details. There's a fair few hits in News for Sony's shared movie universe, but that's already covered at Sony's Spider-Man Universe, and when Sony is removed, there's not much outside of trivial Wikipedia:VALNET hits, which don't count toward notability. There's a brief hit here [10], but that's very short and more discussing characters than locations. Outside of that, Books has little bar trivial mentions using it as a buzzword for Spider-Man media. I can't view every scholar hit, but there seems to be a lot of hits on the multiverse in Spider-Man, but again that's an entirely different subject. There may be some hits I missed but I did take a look through everything I could and found little. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 05:45, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
- Whoa, I'm late to the party but WP:VALNET is the findings of WikiProject Video Games. At WP:RSPLIST, the only Valnet source listed is Screen Rant, which warns iirc that it should not be used for controversial BLP material. Collider, MovieWeb, CBR, there's nothing barring use of those to prove notability of a subject, akin to Behind the Voice Actors. BarntToust 13:41, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
- @BarntToust despite being used by Wikipedia:VG, their consensus is traditionally followed in regards to their assertion of Valnet's usability. Nearly every AfD I've been in has considered WP:VG's consensus as the gold standard for handling Valnet, and I've even seen it applied outside of AfDs too. Note also that RSPLIST is not a 100% inclusive list, as there are many sources not discussed there that are frequently used (or not used) sitewide, and in these cases project consensus is often used instead. If you want to discuss the usability of these sources, bring it up at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard, as this is outside the scope of an AfD if you wish to challenge pre-existing consensus on source assessments. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 19:23, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
- Whoa, I'm late to the party but WP:VALNET is the findings of WikiProject Video Games. At WP:RSPLIST, the only Valnet source listed is Screen Rant, which warns iirc that it should not be used for controversial BLP material. Collider, MovieWeb, CBR, there's nothing barring use of those to prove notability of a subject, akin to Behind the Voice Actors. BarntToust 13:41, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
- I'm personally of the mind that if it's at AfD, we may as well stick with the discussion while it's here, but I see your point. Decided to do a quick source run to double check details. There's a fair few hits in News for Sony's shared movie universe, but that's already covered at Sony's Spider-Man Universe, and when Sony is removed, there's not much outside of trivial Wikipedia:VALNET hits, which don't count toward notability. There's a brief hit here [10], but that's very short and more discussing characters than locations. Outside of that, Books has little bar trivial mentions using it as a buzzword for Spider-Man media. I can't view every scholar hit, but there seems to be a lot of hits on the multiverse in Spider-Man, but again that's an entirely different subject. There may be some hits I missed but I did take a look through everything I could and found little. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 05:45, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
- Which is why there should be allowed time to find sources to prove whether it is or not, rather than forcing an AfD with inconclusive information. This is something to hash out at the list talk, not here. AfD should be a last resort, not a garbage dumb to prove a point. Trailblazer101 (talk) 05:22, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
- There is no indication the Universe of Spider-Man is a notable topic either, though. That's my main concern. Regardless of title, this is just a non-notable topic unless sourcing can be shown. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 05:19, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
- My reasoning here is that Spider-Man is an article on a specific fictional character, not the entire universe this character occupies, which is separately notable. Although this universe is a subset of the Marvel Comics universe it has locations and characters (many of these separately notable) that arise from it and that are specific to Spider-Man media. This is reflected in fact that there are three separate film franchises, including the 1970s one, around this character and their environs completely unconnected to the MCU or anything else Marvel. Of course, there is also the MCU-adjacent film series, which also reflects the locations and character specific to the Spider-Man universe. Perhaps the title of this article needs to be adjusted to reflect that or the criteria for inclusion of content needs to be clarified, but it will not be at all difficult to demonstrate GNG worthy coverage at this fictional world I've tried with the character itself. BD2412 T 18:46, 14 February 2025 (UTC)
- An all-or-nothing rule seems ill-considered here, given that Wikipedia has tons of lists of instances for which some are notable and have articles while others are not (e.g., List of mayors of Florence). BD2412 T 17:23, 14 February 2025 (UTC)
- CSC only applies if none meet notability, which is blatantly false when three of the article's entries have their own articles. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 14:01, 14 February 2025 (UTC)
- Keep much as it is. Hyperbolick (talk) 23:33, 13 February 2025 (UTC)
- Keep I mean seriously, this better be the last of these AFD abuses I find or you're going to ANI, dude. BarntToust 02:00, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
- @BarntToust Drop that tone and WP:REFACTOR yourself, or ANI it will be - for your violations of WP:CIV and WP:NPA. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:21, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
@Piotrus, you calling the work of the contributors "crap" is something that tells me you need to REFACTOR yourself, as no editor should be as brazen as you have been at these afds. Before you dig yourself into a bigger hole by gettingpissyagitated with me, I strongly suggest you do as @Jclemens advised you on the MU afd; to quote them describing your conduct:deceptive, inappropriate, and your attitude is unbecomingly disrespectful to the people who build Wikipedia. Do better, and stop kicking sandcastles over just because you're an academic
. BarntToust 03:36, 15 February 2025 (UTC)@BD2412, as you were saying on the MU AfD, what are your thoughts on this? BarntToust 03:47, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
- Jesus, Piotrus, you should know better than being confrontational to other editors. Please, WP:Assume good faith and don't pick fights. That is not what this discussion is for. I would happily report either one for derailing this discussion and being uncivil towards each other, so I hope it doesn't have to come to that. Trailblazer101 (talk) 03:50, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
- Alright, I'm finna tap out and just fine-tune a page I've been working on. Sayonara. BarntToust 03:57, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
- @BarntToust Drop that tone and WP:REFACTOR yourself, or ANI it will be - for your violations of WP:CIV and WP:NPA. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:21, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
- I'm striking out some confrontational garbage I wrote. I got better things to write for better reasons. BarntToust 04:49, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
- For those who care, I have mended fences with BarnToust on my talk page - we are good. And I will also apologize for using the term 'crap'. While I consider the content in question to be low quality and IMHO mostly non-encyclopedic, I was too colloquial in my assessment :> Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:23, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. This is inherently unsalvageable and redundant fancruft. * Pppery * it has begun... 17:13, 17 February 2025 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Little support for outright deletion, but there is no apparent consensus on whether this should be standalone page. Keep or merge?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dclemens1971 (talk) 06:09, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- I would have no objection to moving this to List of features of Spider-Man media, if that is all that it would take to resolve the question. BD2412 T 01:05, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
- @BD2412 But is it a list of media of a list of in-universe concepts? I mean, what are "features of media"? This name is just weird, compared to (closed as keep) Features of the Marvel Universe, which at least is clearly about the latter (in-universe stuff). Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 01:54, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
- PS. I'll ping @Trailblazer101, @Jclemens, @Hyperbolick, @BarntToust. If you want this kept, fine, but can you at least tell us what you think about the current name and scope of the article, and suggest a better name? Spider-Man universe? Features of Spider-Man universe? List of Spider-Man concepts? What is this supposed to be? Because at the very least, this is not about media. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 01:58, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
- If the title is an issue, I would be comfortable with either List of Spider-Man features, Features from the Spider-Man universe, or List of features in Spider-Man media. "Spider-Man universe" would be too ambiguous as it could also refer to the Spider-Verse or Sony's Spider-Man Universe, and I feel if we titled it with "concepts", then the scope would have to change to encompass the Spider-Verse, Symbiotes, cloning, etc. Trailblazer101 (talk) 02:04, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
- @Piotrus: You are misunderstanding "media" here, which I grant may be due to my use of the word in a jargony way. It just means the media in which the work is produced. This is a list of features originating in the comic books (as things relating to Spider-Man generally do) and then used in other Spider-Man media, such as TV series, video games, and films. BD2412 T 02:08, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
- Usually, Wikipedia terms "lists" as lists, while only excluding the term once the page becomes the host of built-out encyclopedic content. e.x. Characters of The Last of Us (TV series)—versus—List of Phineas and Ferb characters.
- In this case, however, I believe that adding verbiage to the title in order to differentiate a "list" from a "built out bastion of encyclopedic information"—that would just be, well, verbiage.
- I may wager that this specific page would require sources of literature on the subject, not just the WP:GOOGLETEST. Doesn't mean it's not notable, just means a different medium would need to be researched. BarntToust 13:13, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
- List of features in Spider-Man media alternatively would be a fantastic title. BarntToust 13:14, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
- PS. I'll ping @Trailblazer101, @Jclemens, @Hyperbolick, @BarntToust. If you want this kept, fine, but can you at least tell us what you think about the current name and scope of the article, and suggest a better name? Spider-Man universe? Features of Spider-Man universe? List of Spider-Man concepts? What is this supposed to be? Because at the very least, this is not about media. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 01:58, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
- I mean either way the subject just isn't notable. Just because it's renamed doesn't change the fact there's no coverage on the topic of features, locations, or the universe of Spider-Man specifically, especially as a group, which is required for a list to meet standalone notability. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 04:37, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
- @Pokelego999: I think we are approaching this from very different mindsets, because to me this is like saying that the entirety of the world constructed around Spider-Man, apart from the character itself, is not notable, even though the same set of fictional locations and environs are re-used throughout many different adaptations of the original property into many different media. BD2412 T 17:56, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
- @BD2412 just because they are re-used does not mean they are instantly notable. We need sources to back up notability, none of which are demonstrated here. As I said before, there may be sources on individual concepts (Stuff like Daily Bugle and Oscorp, though I admittedly haven't checked for those) or on related concepts (Like the multiverse in Spider-Man) but if there's no sourcing on a topic, in this case the Spider-Man universe, than it's just non-notable, regardless of any assumed assertions of notability. If you can provide sources to back up your claims I'd be willing to potentially reconsider, but right now you're basically saying Wikipedia:ITSNOTABLE and nothing more. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 18:01, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
- There is literally a New York Times article cited on this page just about Aunt May's house. Most of the locations detailed in this article are included in Sanderson, Peter (2007). The Marvel Comics Guide to New York City. New York City: Pocket Books. pp. 30–33, 221–22. ISBN 978-1-4165-3141-8. Retrieved 18 July 2015.. This is sourced. BD2412 T 19:16, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
- Notability of the concept is not INHERITED from the notability of individual locations. Regardless of whether its a standalone article or a list, coverage must be shown of that article's primary topic specifically. If it's a list, coverage must be shown of the subject as a group for it to meet notability. Using today's FA as an example, Tesla and unions is notable because there's coverage of Tesla's relationship with labor unions specifically. If all the coverage was about one specific union and nothing else, we'd have an article on that union, and not an article on an overall topic that doesn't have coverage. For an example from something I've been working on recently, we have articles on individual games in the Pokémon Stadium series, but not an overall series article. This is because there is no coverage on the series as a whole, but there is enough coverage on the individual games that each can sustain an article. If Aunt May's house has the coverage for an article, so be it, but that does not mean the Spider-Man universe, or the features of said universe, are notable because Aunt May's house is.
- As for your book, I can't gauge much of the exact content of that book you're citing because it's paywalled, so there may be some SIGCOV on the entire concept of a Spider-Man universe or locations independently of the Marvel Universe in there, but that can't really be gauged unless you have access to the book and can provide exact quotations within it. If it's just the concept of individual locations being discussed (Obviously don't know if this is in the book or not, but if the coverage is just on Oscorp or the Daily Bugle specifically and nothing else, for example) and not the overall concept, that still falls into the pitfalls I've mentioned above regardless of what kind of source it's coming from. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 22:21, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
- @Pokelego999: It is not paywalled for me. There are four full pages on Empire State University, and two lines in that section discussing Midtown High School. Later in the book there are two full pages on Ravencroft Asylum. BD2412 T 03:19, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
- While that doesn't really help the case of showing subject notability, I'd bring up the Ravencroft pages at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ravencroft. I don't know how helpful they'll be, given it's the only source of any substance so far, but it may be worth mentioning in case it can help there. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 03:42, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
- @Pokelego999: It is not paywalled for me. There are four full pages on Empire State University, and two lines in that section discussing Midtown High School. Later in the book there are two full pages on Ravencroft Asylum. BD2412 T 03:19, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
- There is literally a New York Times article cited on this page just about Aunt May's house. Most of the locations detailed in this article are included in Sanderson, Peter (2007). The Marvel Comics Guide to New York City. New York City: Pocket Books. pp. 30–33, 221–22. ISBN 978-1-4165-3141-8. Retrieved 18 July 2015.. This is sourced. BD2412 T 19:16, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
- @BD2412 just because they are re-used does not mean they are instantly notable. We need sources to back up notability, none of which are demonstrated here. As I said before, there may be sources on individual concepts (Stuff like Daily Bugle and Oscorp, though I admittedly haven't checked for those) or on related concepts (Like the multiverse in Spider-Man) but if there's no sourcing on a topic, in this case the Spider-Man universe, than it's just non-notable, regardless of any assumed assertions of notability. If you can provide sources to back up your claims I'd be willing to potentially reconsider, but right now you're basically saying Wikipedia:ITSNOTABLE and nothing more. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 18:01, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
- @Pokelego999: I think we are approaching this from very different mindsets, because to me this is like saying that the entirety of the world constructed around Spider-Man, apart from the character itself, is not notable, even though the same set of fictional locations and environs are re-used throughout many different adaptations of the original property into many different media. BD2412 T 17:56, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
- @BD2412 But is it a list of media of a list of in-universe concepts? I mean, what are "features of media"? This name is just weird, compared to (closed as keep) Features of the Marvel Universe, which at least is clearly about the latter (in-universe stuff). Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 01:54, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
- Delete or merge per WP:ATD. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NLIST due to a lack of independent reliable sources. At best, "Features of X" is a WP:REDUNDANTFORK of "X", if you recycle most of the same independent reliable sourced to dig into the WP:TRIVIA.
- In the interest of finding a compromise, I note that there is a Spider-man article that mashes together the character and the fiction itself. I'd normally consider it to be a WP:REDUNDANTFORK to split the titular character from the franchise, but it is not without precedent in exceptional cases, like James Bond and James Bond (literary character). If there's a way to re-organize this information (while removing the unsourced information), this may be a way to achieve that. Shooterwalker (talk) 19:59, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
- @Shooterwalker: I would note that Features of Spider-Man media is itself a subset of Features of the Marvel Universe (just SNOW-kept at AfD), but that article is already coming up on 140K, so a subset would logically be split off from it anyway. I would have no objection to having an article on the character separate from the setting(s), but that would ultimately amount to a renaming and perhaps restructuring of this article. I would also note that Marvel tends to reuse entities established in Spider-Man media, so that other characters and storylines develop in connection with those entities with increasingly tertiary ties to Spider-Man, though Spider-Man remains the primary character of significance to those entities. BD2412 T 21:48, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
- The content is still intrinsically tied to the Marvel universe. Additionally, every location on the Spider-Man article is already listed at the main Features article, barring Aunt May's house and Midtown High. Simply merge both of those entries over, cut out the unneeded fluff from Midtown (Like the student lists, which are unnecessary for a number of reasons) and the content as present slots in just fine. It shouldn't drastically increase the amount of bytes in the article, and if the article is at size capacity, it may be worth trying to see how information should be reorganized first before additional splits are made (For instance, does that parent article really need lists of objects used by prominent superheroes? Those can just be redirected to the parent superhero). Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 01:36, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
- Indeed. Marvel Universe is big enough to warrant one article about its setting, but we have three (Cinamatic and this one). I hope one day we can reduce it to one, without too much information loss (that said, given it's pretty much all plot summary, shrug, Fandom does WP:FANCRUFT better anyway). Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:25, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
- The content is still intrinsically tied to the Marvel universe. Additionally, every location on the Spider-Man article is already listed at the main Features article, barring Aunt May's house and Midtown High. Simply merge both of those entries over, cut out the unneeded fluff from Midtown (Like the student lists, which are unnecessary for a number of reasons) and the content as present slots in just fine. It shouldn't drastically increase the amount of bytes in the article, and if the article is at size capacity, it may be worth trying to see how information should be reorganized first before additional splits are made (For instance, does that parent article really need lists of objects used by prominent superheroes? Those can just be redirected to the parent superhero). Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 01:36, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
- @Shooterwalker: I would note that Features of Spider-Man media is itself a subset of Features of the Marvel Universe (just SNOW-kept at AfD), but that article is already coming up on 140K, so a subset would logically be split off from it anyway. I would have no objection to having an article on the character separate from the setting(s), but that would ultimately amount to a renaming and perhaps restructuring of this article. I would also note that Marvel tends to reuse entities established in Spider-Man media, so that other characters and storylines develop in connection with those entities with increasingly tertiary ties to Spider-Man, though Spider-Man remains the primary character of significance to those entities. BD2412 T 21:48, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
- Merge or delete. Fails WP:GNG, and the article is almost filled entirely with WP:Fancruft. 🍕BP!🍕 (🔔) 06:14, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
- Buzz (DC Thomson) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I redirected based on there being only a database source. This was undone, and a new source (this book) was added. That book comes from an author and publisher who do not seem to be notable as I can barely find any info on either, and the book itself appears to be full of reprinted comics and no valuable prose. There's also little to suggest notability of this subject, nor the few bluelinked strips listed here. This appears to be a subject of very niche interest, and probably not something that would've gotten a ton of coverage. I would stick with the redirect to The Topper (comics). QuietHere (talk | contributions) 14:29, 10 February 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Comics and animation and United Kingdom. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 14:29, 10 February 2025 (UTC)
- Keep - This is a short running comic (not even 2 years starting in 1973) but it was being reprinted (and advertised on the front cover) as part of Classic of the Comics up until 2010. That's near 40 (not continuous) years as part of national publications. I know the source I added isnt the best but its more than just reprinted comics, its a complete index of the Topper comic that Buzz merged into. I'm going to have a look for more sources. Eopsid (talk) 16:21, 10 February 2025 (UTC)
- I've added some more sources, I think there are more out there in other books. Eopsid (talk) 18:20, 10 February 2025 (UTC)
- Keep Kibble-White's Ultimate Book of British Comics has something like 4 pages on it, Gifford's Character Encyclopedia probably covers half-a-dozen plus strips (with his two catalogues possibly good for the odd cite), it might be covered in Cadogan's DCT book (been a while since I read that one) and all of this is without bothering to look at any specialist magazines - Crikey! almost certainly ran at least one article on it. BoomboxTestarossa (talk) 21:34, 14 February 2025 (UTC)
- Also, if it absolutely has to be redirected somewhere because people don't like comics, the list of DC Thomson publications makes a lot more sense than to The Topper, which is just confusing. BoomboxTestarossa (talk) 21:36, 14 February 2025 (UTC)
- The Topper seems like a fine target to me since Buzz was merged into it, and that merger is mentioned in The Topper's lead. List of D. C. Thomson & Co. Ltd publications only mentions the name and years of publication, so it's less valuable in terms of how much information is supplied. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 21:59, 14 February 2025 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× ☎ 12:31, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
- List of boats in The Adventures of Tintin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
So, there's some interesting stuff here in the form of well written and referenced text on "The maritime world in The Adventures of Tintin", but this is wrapped in fancrufty and poorly referenced list that fails WP:NLIST (and while the list appears to have plenty of footnotes, many are just unreferenced notes or commentary). As a list, I think his has no reason to exist, but the content could probably be merged somewhere, or maybe split (or perhaps we could just delete the list part of this article and rename it?). It's a weird case, I've very rarely seen some good content bundled with bad one in such a way... If this is somehow kept, obviously, this is not a list of boats, but ships (or ships and boats?). Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 12:40, 1 February 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements, Comics and animation, Lists, and France. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 12:40, 1 February 2025 (UTC)
- Keep: For what it's worth, the corresponding article in French is a GA. The topic is covered in a dedicated book! Horeau, Y. (1999). Tintin, Haddock et les bateaux. (Among other existing sources) Meets WP:NL. Topic addressed as a set.The rest of the issues are normal issues that can be handled through normal editing. Most of the ships in Tintin are notable, btw. Even see GNews -Mushy Yank. 19:12, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Belgium-related deletion discussions. -Mushy Yank. 22:46, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and WP:NLIST. Azuredivay (talk) 09:38, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
- Keep per Mushy Yank. BilletsMauves€500 10:50, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and WP:NLIST. I'm only seeing trivial mentions and plot details. The relevant plot stuff is already mentioned at the main series article, which would be an acceptable redirect target, per WP:ATD. Shooterwalker (talk) 20:54, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
- Comment In case it's not clear from my comment, the official book from Moulinsart (Tintin, Haddock et les bateaux) is made by the owner and IP holder of Tintin, and does not address WP:GNG or WP:NLIST. I see comments that keep referring to this source, and want to make it clear to them. Without independent reliable sources, we can't write an article that meets Wikipedia's basic policies. Detailed descriptions of official Tintin materials belong on fan wikis. Shooterwalker (talk) 19:25, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks, that's important as GNG requires independent sources. It's like sourcing our typical comic book character to a "comic book encyclopedia" published by the same publisher... (which we generally do not accept as a proof of notability) Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:29, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
- Comment In case it's not clear from my comment, the official book from Moulinsart (Tintin, Haddock et les bateaux) is made by the owner and IP holder of Tintin, and does not address WP:GNG or WP:NLIST. I see comments that keep referring to this source, and want to make it clear to them. Without independent reliable sources, we can't write an article that meets Wikipedia's basic policies. Detailed descriptions of official Tintin materials belong on fan wikis. Shooterwalker (talk) 19:25, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
- Keep and rename to List of ships in The Adventures of Tintin as more appropriate title (I assume this might come from French "bateaux" as in the title of Horeu's book meaning both ships and boats). As already pointed out by Mushy Yank there are secondary sources with enough coverage as to fullfill WP:LISTN. Everything else are problems which can be solved through normal editing and are therefore no grounds for deletion. If someone wants to transform this into a fully prose article, or even expand the scope to The sea in The Adventures of Tintin, I have no objections. But these again would be editorial decisions which are no grounds for deleting what we have now. Daranios (talk) 16:35, 5 February 2025 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting in the hopes of finding a more definitive consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BD2412 T 02:06, 9 February 2025 (UTC)- Keep The book citation provided by Mushy Yank, as well as other secondary sources that are already in the article, indicate that the ships have been discussed as a group, therefore alleviating the main concern of the nominator and the other delete voters. Simply citing the policy without explaining why it violates NLIST like some have done here is a very poor deletion rationale. Obviously, the article needs to be renamed to List of ships in The Adventures of Tintin, but all of the issues in the article can be resolved through editing and are not indicative of a fundamental flaw that warrants full deletion. Billclinton1996 (talk) 07:31, 11 February 2025 (UTC)
- Merge some of the content on Secret of the Unicorn and Red Sea Sharks to their respective articles. I was somewhat hesitant, but a deeper look at the sources reveals that there is quite literally only one piece of SIGCOV, that being the book Yank mentioned above. Much of the dev info is about individual ships COATRACKED together, and not as the discussion of boats as a whole. Some of this info is worthwhile for preservation at individual subjects, but one SIGCOV piece and a lot of COATRACKING just isn't enough to base an entire article on. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 03:12, 13 February 2025 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, All Tomorrows No Yesterdays (Ughhh.... What did I do wrong this time?) 15:50, 16 February 2025 (UTC) - Keep per Billclinton1996. Christian75 (talk) 20:39, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
- George DiCaprio (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
WP:NOTINHERITED, George here is only known in connection with his famous son Leonardo DiCaprio. His "acting debut" is a very small few second cameo, his work as a writer/artist (not really clear) fails WP:ARTIST and his work as a filmmaker fails WP:FILMMAKER, getting a small stint editing on local newspapers does not make you notable. Source 5 in the article shows he's worked on... three comics? Don't know if it's even reliable as a source but clearly not noteworthy in itself. jolielover♥talk 14:54, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Artists, and Authors. jolielover♥talk 14:54, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Comics and animation and New York. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:20, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
- Keep — Note expanded bibliography, which establishes DiCaprio as an active editor and writer in the underground movement in the 1970s (extending into the early 1980s). -- User:Mikeross22 (talk) 19:00, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
- He stills fails WP:AUTHOR, as none of his work in the bibliography is notable. jolielover♥talk 03:30, 5 February 2025 (UTC)
- I beg to differ. The entire underground comix movement was designed to change people's perceptions of what stories were "worth" telling in the comics format, so many products of that era fail a mainstream definition of "notablity". Nonetheless, the material produced during that era changed the comics industry forever, heralding the alternative comics movement and the rise of the graphic novel. That history has been well established. DiCaprio's role during that time as a writer, publisher, editor, and distributor is also well-established. Not to mention that he collaborated with such "notable" artists as Justin Green and Jay Kinney, and contributed to anthologies such as Arcade and Slow Death. -- User:Mikeross22 (talk) 16:32, 5 February 2025 (UTC)
- Yours is an admirably expressive and nuanced opinion. However, our own take matters very little as far as a person's notability is concerned. Sources rule-The Gnome (talk) 20:07, 5 February 2025 (UTC)
- I beg to differ. The entire underground comix movement was designed to change people's perceptions of what stories were "worth" telling in the comics format, so many products of that era fail a mainstream definition of "notablity". Nonetheless, the material produced during that era changed the comics industry forever, heralding the alternative comics movement and the rise of the graphic novel. That history has been well established. DiCaprio's role during that time as a writer, publisher, editor, and distributor is also well-established. Not to mention that he collaborated with such "notable" artists as Justin Green and Jay Kinney, and contributed to anthologies such as Arcade and Slow Death. -- User:Mikeross22 (talk) 16:32, 5 February 2025 (UTC)
- He stills fails WP:AUTHOR, as none of his work in the bibliography is notable. jolielover♥talk 03:30, 5 February 2025 (UTC)
- Delete since subject fails WP:GNG and is not saved by WP:ARTIST. Wikipedia is not a collection of random articles nor a directory of artists. And the fact that the text has been created by a kamikaze account does not exactly help. -The Gnome (talk) 20:07, 5 February 2025 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 17:38, 7 February 2025 (UTC)
- Keep because there are at least three good sources. However, there are several sources that need to be removed and the article tagged as needing better sources, if it is kept. Bearian (talk) 19:30, 10 February 2025 (UTC)
- It isn't about the sources, obviously Leonardo DiCaprio's dad is going to have a plethora of articles about him no matter what he did. The issue is that he has no notability outside of being Leo's father. jolielover♥talk 05:15, 11 February 2025 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 04:38, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
- Soft Keep I agree with the above needs better sources and some expanding. I say keep for now and maybe re-nominate in the future if its not expanded on much better sources found. ContentEditman (talk) 16:29, 16 February 2025 (UTC)
- The article's had 15 years to work on jolielover♥talk 10:30, 17 February 2025 (UTC)
- Delete, you need to have notability on your own, not from your son. Fails on the not inheritied grounds. Iljhgtn (talk) 16:37, 17 February 2025 (UTC)
- KEEP: His work in underground comix is notable, not his relationship to his son. I added some more verified sources on that part of his life, from the likes of The Comics Journal and published books on the movement -- User:Mikeross22 (talk) 17:59, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
Comics and animation proposed deletions
Categories for discussion
Redirects for discussion
Templates for discussion
Requested moves, merges, and splits
- To edit these sections, see moves, merges, and splits
Requested moves
Proposed merges
- Alternate versions of Doctor Doom and Doctor Doom in other media to Doctor Doom (Discuss)
- Batgirl (comic book) to Batgirl (As a result of AFD)
- Batman (set index) to Batman (Discuss)
- Batman Forever (video game) to Batman Forever: The Arcade Game (Discuss)
- Bibliography of Titans titles to List of Teen Titans comics (Discuss)
- Black Hood to Black Hood Comics (Discuss)
- Book of the Vishanti, Doctor Strange in other media, Eye of Agamotto, Cloak of Levitation and Orb of Agamotto to Doctor Strange (Talk:Doctor Strange#Merge)
- Characters of Watchmen to Watchmen (Discuss)
- Earth-616 to Marvel Universe (Discuss)
- El Campeon to The Amazing Joy Buzzards (Discuss)
- Flux (comics), Galaxy Master, Puffball Collective, Speedfreek, Tyrannus (comics) to List of Hulk supporting characters (Discuss)
- Hook, Line and Sinker (Transformers) to Heralds of Unicron (As a result of AFD)
- Iron Lad to Kang the Conqueror (Discuss)
- Iron Man's armor to Iron Man (Discuss)
- List of James Bond comics to James Bond (comics)
- List of Pearls Before Swine characters to Pearls Before Swine (comic strip)
- Manticore (City of Heroes) to Universe of City of Heroes
- Mtigwaki to For Better or For Worse (As a result of AFD)
- Neo (Marvel Comics species) to Neo (comics)
- Nightglider and Positron (City of Heroes) to List of Beast Wars characters
- OMAC (comics) with One-Man Army Corps
- Power Surge (comics) to Power Company
- Ralph Snart with Ralph Snart Adventures
- Runaway (Amalgam Comics) to List of Amalgam Comics publications
- Zach Weiner to Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal
- Princess Adora to She-Ra
- Stephane Roux with Stéphane Roux
- Thunderer (DC Comics) to Metamorpho
- Trioccula to List of Marvel Comics characters: T (As a result of AFD)
- Ultimate Comics: Spider-Man to Ultimate Spider-Man
Proposed splits
Recent creations
Bot generated
This list was generated from these rules. Questions and feedback are always welcome! The search is being run daily with the most recent ~14 days of results. Note: Some articles may not be relevant to this project.
Rules | Match log | Results page (for watching) | Last updated: 2025-02-22 20:32 (UTC)
Note: The list display can now be customized by each user. See List display personalization for details.
- Scott Liggett (music producer) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by GoldasCold (talk · contribs · new pages (1)) started on 2025-02-22, score: 30
- Scarygirl (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by Zxcvbnm (talk · contribs · new pages (9)) started on 2025-02-21, score: 30
- Draft:Tamanna Murdeshwar (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) by Strangefrostmax (talk · contribs · new pages (1)) started on 2025-02-22, score: 30
- De Spiegeleer (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by Qaswa (talk · contribs · new pages (99)) started on 2025-02-20, score: 38
- Draft:Just Shapes And Comics (indie show) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) by Superboy565 (talk · contribs · new pages (1)) started on 2025-02-21, score: 30
- Draft:Taiguara Torro (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) by Jesicareuter (talk · contribs · new pages (1)) started on 2025-02-21, score: 30
- Draft:Strange Academy (TV series) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) by KingArti (talk · contribs · new pages (12)) started on 2025-02-20, score: 38
- Category:Television shows based on Nigerian comics (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) by Savagexx (talk · contribs · new pages (2)) started on 2025-02-20, score: 108
- Tv4 (Turkish TV channel) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by KuмaN (talk · contribs · new pages (1)) started on 2025-02-20, score: 38
- Chantal De Spiegeleer (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by Jmanlucas (talk · contribs · new pages (43)) started on 2025-02-19, score: 121
- Kane (wrestler) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by Donaldo Silvério (talk · contribs · new pages (2)) started on 2025-02-18, score: 34
- Draft:Terror Inc. (TV series) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) by KingArti (talk · contribs · new pages (12)) started on 2025-02-20, score: 38
- Draft:Dianne Dengel (artist) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) by Susanplank (talk · contribs · new pages (1)) started on 2025-02-20, score: 30
- Season Four Finale (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by Marco camino 10 (talk · contribs · new pages (1)) started on 2025-02-19, score: 27
- List of animated features films Pre-1940s-1960s (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by Wikisurfer1234 (talk · contribs · new pages (1)) started on 2025-02-19, score: 56
- Sinthea Shmidt (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by 69.121.183.150 (talk · contribs · new pages (2)) started on 2025-02-19, score: 186
- Superman Reborn (unmade film/script reading performance) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by Misterkocher (talk · contribs · new pages (2)) started on 2025-02-15, score: 65
- Draft:Nakladatelství Paseka (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) by Muteminds (talk · contribs · new pages (1)) started on 2025-02-19, score: 60
- Draft:Atom Eve (character) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) by Afrowriter (talk · contribs · new pages (5)) started on 2025-02-19, score: 76
- Draft:Alice Rattled By Rats (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) by Cyberspere (talk · contribs · new pages (1)) started on 2025-02-19, score: 30
- Draft:Spider-Man 4: Fan Film (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) by Chance997 (talk · contribs · new pages (4)) started on 2025-02-18, score: 38
- Category:2025 comics endings (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) by Shellwood (talk · contribs · new pages (91)) started on 2025-02-19, score: 78
- Category:Films based on works by Gérard Lauzier (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) by Uriahheep228 (talk · contribs · new pages (196)) started on 2025-02-18, score: 38
- Iyanu: Child of Wonder (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by Historyday01 (talk · contribs · new pages (2)) started on 2025-02-18, score: 57
- List of dramatic television series with LGBTQ characters: 2010–2015 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by Pastelitodepapa (talk · contribs · new pages (250)) started on 2025-02-18, score: 23
- Requiem for a Beast (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by TheDragonFire (talk · contribs · new pages (3)) started on 2025-02-17, score: 30
- Draft:This Missive, This Machination! (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) by Afrowriter (talk · contribs · new pages (5)) started on 2025-02-18, score: 72
- Nemesis: Rogues' Gallery (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by 217.75.5.21 (talk · contribs · new pages (2)) started on 2025-02-17, score: 100
- Cultural depictions of Mahathir Mohamad (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by Thegreatrebellion (talk · contribs · new pages (6)) started on 2025-02-17, score: 38
- Phil Bard (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by Nvss132 (talk · contribs · new pages (3)) started on 2025-02-17, score: 70
- Jaik Puppyteeth (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by Eric Carpenter (talk · contribs · new pages (25)) started on 2025-02-16, score: 68
- The Immortal Thor (comic book) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by GeekU27 (talk · contribs · new pages (1)) started on 2025-02-16, score: 148
- Draft:Spider-Man (Sam Raimi 2002 film series) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) by Chance997 (talk · contribs · new pages (4)) started on 2025-02-16, score: 38
- Category:Derek Flint (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) by Dimadick (talk · contribs · new pages (120)) started on 2025-02-17, score: 48
- Category:Fictional detectives in comics (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) by Clarityfiend (talk · contribs · new pages (19)) started on 2025-02-17, score: 70
- Characters of the Street Fighter III series (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by Kung Fu Man (talk · contribs · new pages (14)) started on 2025-02-16, score: 34
- Zsazsa Zaturnnah (film) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by GeniusTaker (talk · contribs · new pages (5)) started on 2025-02-16, score: 38
- Greg McLean (filmmaker) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by DisneyMetalhead (talk · contribs · new pages (2)) started on 2025-02-16, score: 68
- Sullivant (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by Hebrides (talk · contribs · new pages (31)) started on 2025-02-15, score: 30
- I Thought You Were Stronger (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by Afrowriter (talk · contribs · new pages (5)) started on 2025-02-15, score: 76
- Invincible season 2 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by Pppery (talk · contribs · new pages (40)) started on 2025-02-15, score: 50
- Draft:Impulse Gamer (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) by Ausjourno (talk · contribs · new pages (1)) started on 2025-02-16, score: 68
- Lanterns (TV series) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by Trailblazer101 (talk · contribs · new pages (13)) started on 2025-02-15, score: 76
- Killer robot (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by Zxcvbnm (talk · contribs · new pages (9)) started on 2025-02-15, score: 30
- Dreaming Celestial (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by BOZ (talk · contribs · new pages (24)) started on 2025-02-15, score: 96
- Camouflaj (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by OceanHok (talk · contribs · new pages (7)) started on 2025-02-15, score: 23
- Sindel (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by MoonJet (talk · contribs · new pages (1)) started on 2025-02-15, score: 34
- Draft:I Thought You Were Stronger (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) by Afrowriter (talk · contribs · new pages (5)) started on 2025-02-15, score: 76
- Draft:The Flash (1990 film) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) by Chance29 (talk · contribs · new pages (1)) started on 2025-02-15, score: 38
- Draft:Basketful of Heads (film) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) by Hildreth gazzard (talk · contribs · new pages (179)) started on 2025-02-14, score: 23
- The New Mutants (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by Silbad (talk · contribs · new pages (2)) started on 2025-02-13, score: 106
- Nemesis: Reloaded (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by 217.75.5.21 (talk · contribs · new pages (2)) started on 2025-02-13, score: 130
- Justine Hammer (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by 69.121.183.150 (talk · contribs · new pages (2)) started on 2025-02-13, score: 142
- The Honey-Mousers (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by OswaldLR (talk · contribs · new pages (1)) started on 2025-02-13, score: 30
- Joaquin Torres (comics) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by BOZ (talk · contribs · new pages (24)) started on 2025-02-12, score: 122
- Theatrical Feature film (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by PepGuardi (talk · contribs · new pages (0)) started on 2025-02-12, score: 38
- One World Under Doom (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by Cambalachero (talk · contribs · new pages (7)) started on 2025-02-12, score: 198
- 5S Online (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by Muhammad Ortega (talk · contribs · new pages (1)) started on 2025-02-12, score: 30
- X-Men: Gambit (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by Enyalya (talk · contribs · new pages (7)) started on 2025-02-03, score: 198
- Draft:Courier (comics) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) by Graeme Bartlett (talk · contribs · new pages (13)) started on 2025-02-13, score: 138
- Draft:Dogu Publishing (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) by JulesExplainsItAll (talk · contribs · new pages (1)) started on 2025-02-13, score: 68
- Onli (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by Qaswa (talk · contribs · new pages (99)) started on 2025-02-12, score: 38
- The Phantom Zone (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by Silbad (talk · contribs · new pages (2)) started on 2025-02-12, score: 38
- Draft:5S Online (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) by Miminity (talk · contribs · new pages (48)) started on 2025-02-12, score: 30
- Draft:The Encyclopedia of Early Earth (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) by TipsyElephant (talk · contribs · new pages (1)) started on 2025-02-11, score: 30
- Category:My Friend Irma (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) by Dimadick (talk · contribs · new pages (120)) started on 2025-02-12, score: 70
- List of Sydney Taylor Book Award recipients (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by Significa liberdade (talk · contribs · new pages (70)) started on 2025-02-11, score: 23
- Gerald Swan (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by Eopsid (talk · contribs · new pages (1)) started on 2025-02-10, score: 84
- Gene Pelc (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by Speerat (talk · contribs · new pages (2)) started on 2025-02-10, score: 99
- Draft:ThePenKiller (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) by Petaglair (talk · contribs · new pages (1)) started on 2025-02-11, score: 30
- Draft:Lightfall (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) by TheSweatyGuy (talk · contribs · new pages (1)) started on 2025-02-10, score: 30
- List of Calvin and Hobbes characters (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by Specialsam110 (talk · contribs · new pages (1)) started on 2025-02-10, score: 69
- Owl (Winnie-the-Pooh) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by Robert McClenon (talk · contribs · new pages (10)) started on 2025-02-10, score: 34
- Kangilaski (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by Altenmann (talk · contribs · new pages (182)) started on 2025-02-09, score: 30
- Jenny Wilson (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by Clarityfiend (talk · contribs · new pages (19)) started on 2025-02-09, score: 30
- Cartoon Network (Turkish TV channel) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by CycloneYoris (talk · contribs · new pages (80)) started on 2025-02-09, score: 36
- Draft:What Happens Next (webcomic) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) by Hey man im josh (talk · contribs · new pages (1128)) started on 2025-02-10, score: 38
- Tim Buckley (comics) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by Thisisarealusername (talk · contribs · new pages (1)) started on 2025-02-09, score: 93
- Chico Bento e a Goiabeira Maraviósa (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by A.WagnerC (talk · contribs · new pages (1)) started on 2025-02-09, score: 38
- New Friday (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by JoeCoffee37 (talk · contribs · new pages (1)) started on 2025-02-08, score: 106
- Leelh (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by Beatriz Pinhata (talk · contribs · new pages (2)) started on 2025-01-31, score: 25
- Draft:Sue Storm (Marvel Cinematic Universe) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) by ZooBlazer (talk · contribs · new pages (1)) started on 2025-02-09, score: 49
- Draft:Porky's Poppa (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) by SDudley (talk · contribs · new pages (1)) started on 2025-02-08, score: 30
- I Never Liked You (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by Robertsky (talk · contribs · new pages (60)) started on 2025-02-08, score: 90
- Draft:Household (TTRPG) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) by Crelb (talk · contribs · new pages (1)) started on 2025-02-08, score: 30
- Michael Alexander Kahn (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by Lauranorcal (talk · contribs · new pages (0)) started on 2025-02-04, score: 30
Human generated
- To edit this section, go to this page
April 2011
- Cerebus (Cerebus storyline) created April 27 by Acidtoyman (talk · contribs)
- High Society (Cerebus storyline) created April 27 by Acidtoyman (talk · contribs)
- Chester Brown's Gospel adaptations created April 26 by Acidtoyman (talk · contribs)
- The Book of Genesis (comics) created April 21 by Acidtoyman (talk · contribs)
- The Complete Crumb Comics created April 19 by Acidtoyman (talk · contribs)
- Underwater (comics) created April 19 by Acidtoyman (talk · contribs)
- Paying For It created April 11 by Acidtoyman (talk · contribs)
- The Little Man (comics) created April 8 by Acidtoyman (talk · contribs)
- The Book of Jim created April 5 by Acidtoyman (talk · contribs)
- Weathercraft created April 4 by Acidtoyman (talk · contribs)
August 2010
- Marcello Toninelli created August 3 by Boris Živ (talk · contribs)
- Piccolo Ranger created August 3 by Boris Živ (talk · contribs)
- The Bellybuttons created August 1 by Gui.rater (talk · contribs)
- Cédric (comics) created August 1 by Gui.rater (talk · contribs)
- IR$ (comics) created August 1 by Gui.rater (talk · contribs)
- Spike (IDW Publishing) created August 1 by Zythe (talk · contribs)
- Le Scorpion created August 1 by Gui.rater (talk · contribs)
- X-Men (vol. 3) created August 1 by Richardm9 (talk · contribs)
July 2010
- Vicatan created July 31 by Artistpro (talk · contribs)
- Kim Seong-hwan created July 31 by Tenmei (talk · contribs)
- The God Machine (comics) created July 31 by Djdavi (talk · contribs)
- Wolf of Kabul created July 39 by Yngvadottir (talk · contribs)
- Scarlet (Icon Comics) created July 30 by CyberGhostface (talk · contribs)
- Oh, Brother! (comic strip) created July 29 by Pepso2 (talk · contribs)
- Marvel Zombies 5 created July 29 by Gman124 (talk · contribs)
- Janu the Jungle Boy created July 29 by PrinceXag (talk · contribs)
- Hotspur (comics) created July 28 by Yngvadottir (talk · contribs)
- Joe the Barbarian created July 27 by Emperor (talk · contribs)
- Ade Capone created July 26 by Boris Živ (talk · contribs)
- World Wildlife Federation of Justice created July 24 by Thickets (talk · contribs)
- Rebo created July 23 by Casmiki (talk · contribs)
- Manticore (DC Comics) created July 21 by Jeremyclarke (talk · contribs)
- Javad Alizadeh created July 21 by Bluesaeed (talk · contribs)
- Digger (Marvel Comics) created July 20 by JoeLoeb (talk · contribs)
- List of Beano comic strips by annual created July 17 by Colonel-Commissar Quiche (talk · contribs)
- The Thanos Imperative created (from redirect) July 16 by Time Burglar (talk · contribs)
- Schoolgirls' Own created July 15 by Malleus Fatuorum (talk · contribs)
- List of Nagraj's comics created July 15 by Siddhartha Shah (talk · contribs)
- Robin Hood (DC Comics) created July 14 by Xero (talk · contribs)
- The Venger: Dead Man Rising created July 14 by Matts128 (talk · contribs)
- Hawkeye & Mockingbird created July 13 by TriiipleThreat (talk · contribs)
- Drive: the scifi comic created July 12 by El guanaquito (talk · contribs)
- Drighangchoo created July 11 by Fafnirdreams (talk · contribs)
- Grim Hunt created July 11 by May Cause Dizziness (talk · contribs)
- List of Eagle comic strips created July 11 by Parrot of Doom (talk · contribs)
- Zorba (comics) created July 10 by JoeLoeb (talk · contribs)
- The Stuff of Legend created July 10 by Webjjss (talk · contribs)
- Harry Haenigsen created July 9 by Pepso2 (talk · contribs)
- Wayne Reynolds created (from redirect) July 8 by 24.148.0.83 (talk · contribs)
- Anti-Matter Man created July 8 by E.A.Kowalewski (talk · contribs)
- My Brain Hurts (comics) created July 7 by Hjaggs (talk · contribs)
- Chase Craig created July 7 by Pepso2 (talk · contribs)
- Tyrone Cash created July 6 by JoeLoeb (talk · contribs)
- Gilberton (publisher) created July 6 by Stoshmaster (talk · contribs)
- The Schoolgirl created July 6 by Malleus Fatuorum (talk · contribs)
- Graphic.ly created July 6 by X1589 (talk · contribs)
- Nigar Nazar created July 5 by Nosheenabbas (talk · contribs)
- The Wizard (DC Thomson) created July 5 by Malleus Fatuorum (talk · contribs)
- List of The Adventures of Tintin locations created July 2 by Goustien (talk · contribs)
- Khemed created July 2 by Goustien (talk · contribs)
- Batwoman: Elegy created July 1 by Ganthet2814 (talk · contribs)
- After Dark (comics) created July 1 by Xbriskox (talk · contribs)
- Sjors en Sjimmie created July 1 by Tomboxz (talk · contribs)
June 2010
- ComiXology created June 30 by May Cause Dizziness (talk · contribs)
- DC Special created June 30 by Stoshmaster (talk · contribs)
- Meebo and Zuky created June 29 by Fanofdisneyvillains (talk · contribs)
- Serge Huo-Chao-Si created June 28 by Danielwork (talk · contribs)
- Steeljack created June 27 by Comicbook1 (talk · contribs)
- Cheapjack Shakespeare created June 27 by Thekerne (talk · contribs)
- Aquarius (DC Comics) created June 27 by E.A.Kowalewski (talk · contribs)
- Daniel Drumm created June 27 by The Editor 155 (talk · contribs)
- Shaun McLaughlin created June 27 by Thekerne (talk · contribs)
- Six By Nine College created June 26 by Morganthegreat (talk · contribs)
- Alan Martin (writer) created June 26 by Ewen (talk · contribs)
- Prayer For Ruin created June 25 by Morganthegreat (talk · contribs)
- Comic Book Collecting Association created June 24 by Theagenes (talk · contribs)
- Parnell Jacobs created June 24 by Stormshadows00 (talk · contribs)
- Superman: Grounded created June 24 by Ganthet2814 (talk · contribs)
- Edgar bercasio created June 23 by Edbercasio (talk · contribs)
- The Oatmeal created June 23 by Gary King (talk · contribs)
- Joe Pruett created June 22 by Drvanthorp (talk · contribs)
- Diego Jourdan created June 22 by Lordmagnusen (talk · contribs)
- Meta 4 created June 22 by Jujutacular (talk · contribs)
- King Arthur (DC Comics) created June 21 by Xero (talk · contribs)
- Ivan Velez, Jr. created June 21 by DragonflySixtyseven (talk · contribs)
- Moon Girl created June 21 by Alhasagianttongue (talk · contribs)
- Garin's uncanny file created June 20 by KungDekZa (talk · contribs)
- Legostar Galactica created June 19 by Wikidude10000 (talk · contribs)
- Francine Langstrom created June 19 by JLouP (talk · contribs)
- Kulak (DC Comics) created June 19 by E.A.Kowalewski (talk · contribs)
- Ménage à 3 created June 18 by Humphdert (talk · contribs)
- Harry J. Tuthill created June 18 by Pepso2 (talk · contribs)
- Methal pertiwi created June 18 by Yance22 (talk · contribs)
- Beast Wars Sourcebook created June 17 by Convoy2004 (talk · contribs)
- Les Femmes en Blanc created June 16 by Auric (talk · contribs)
- Fluorescent Black (comics) created June 15 by TutenCom (talk · contribs)
- Steel Wind (comics) created June 12 by Jrfoldes (talk · contribs)
- Kill Shakespeare created June 11 by Deathstrok (talk · contribs)
- Gus Mager created June 11 by UnicornTapestry (talk · contribs)
- Stacy Dolan created June 10 by Jrfoldes (talk · contribs)
- Roy of the Rovers (comic) created June 9 by Malleus Fatuorum (talk · contribs)
- The Deacon created June 9 by Jrfoldes (talk · contribs)
- Zadkiel (comics) created June 9 by Jrfoldes (talk · contribs)
- Nib-Lit created June 8 by Mickeycomix (talk · contribs)
- Puppet Master (Eternity Comics) created June 8 by Siamesehare (talk · contribs)
- Gay Bride of Frankenstein created June 2 by Butlerbilly (talk · contribs)
- Weekly comic book review created June 2 by Bestbeast (talk · contribs)
- Shriker created June 7 by Jrfoldes (talk · contribs)
- Leland Drummond created June 6 by May Cause Dizziness (talk · contribs)
- Shadowland (comics) created June 5 by May Cause Dizziness (talk · contribs)
- Jonah Hex: No Way Back created June 3 by May Cause Dizziness (talk · contribs)
- Demonic Toys (comics) created June 2 by Siamesehare (talk · contribs)
- Ifor Owen created June 1 by FruitMonkey (talk · contribs)
Cleanup
Quality
Featured articles
The project has 17 featured articles. 7 of them, or 41.2%, are flagged for cleanup.
Article | Maintenance categories |
---|---|
300 (film) «FA» | Articles with dead external links (Jan 2009) |
Captain Marvel (DC Comics) «FA, High» | Articles with dead external links (Oct 2008) |
Megatokyo «FA» | Articles with unsourced statements (Mar 2009) |
Roy of the Rovers «FA» | Articles needing additional references (Aug 2009), Articles with dead external links (Aug 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (Aug 2009) |
Superman (film series) «FA» | Articles with unsourced statements (Jan 2009) |
The Adventures of Tintin «FA, Top» | Articles with unsourced statements (Oct 2008) |
Watchmen «FA, High» | Articles to be merged (Aug 2009) |
Featured lists
The project has 1 featured lists. None of them is flagged for cleanup.
A-Class articles
The project has 2 A-Class articles. None of them is flagged for cleanup.
Good articles
The project has 71 good articles. 7 of them, or 9.9%, are flagged for cleanup.
Article | Maintenance categories |
---|---|
Barbara Gordon «GA» | Vague or ambiguous time |
Clara Elsene Peck «GA» | Articles with dead external links (Aug 2009) |
Hergé «GA, High» | Articles with unsourced statements (Sep 2007) |
Jyllands-Posten Muhammad cartoons controversy «GA» | Cleanup (Jun 2009) |
Michigan State University libraries «GA» | Articles with unsourced statements (Apr 2007) |
The Transformers (IDW Publishing) «GA» | Articles that may contain original research (Aug 2009) |
Wanted (2008 film) «GA» | Articles with unsourced statements (Mar 2009) |
Importance
Top-importance articles
The project has 57 top-importance articles. 35 of them, or 61.4%, are flagged for cleanup.
Article | Maintenance categories |
---|---|
Alan Moore «Top» | Articles with minor POV problems (Mar 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (Jan 2009) |
Alternative comics «Top» | Articles lacking sources (Oct 2008) |
American comic book «Top» | Articles needing additional references (Oct 2007), Articles that may contain original research (Jul 2009), Articles with specifically-marked weasel-worded phrases (Aug 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (Feb 2007, Apr 2007, Oct 2007, Nov 2007, May 2008, Jun 2009) |
Archie Andrews (comics) «Top» | Articles needing additional references (Feb 2009), Articles with trivia sections (Jan 2008), Wikipedia articles needing style editing (Dec 2007) |
Archie Comics «Top» | Articles to be split (Sep 2008), Articles with unsourced statements (Feb 2007, Oct 2008) |
Carl Barks «Top» | Articles with unsourced statements (Feb 2007) |
Cartoonist «Top» | Articles lacking sources (May 2009) |
Cerebus the Aardvark «Top» | Articles with unsourced statements (Sep 2007, Feb 2008, Jul 2008, Feb 2009, Mar 2009, May 2009) |
Comics «Top» | Articles with unsourced statements (Nov 2008) |
Comics Code Authority «Top» | Articles containing potentially dated statements from 2007 |
Comic book «Top» | Articles lacking reliable references (Nov 2007), Articles with specifically-marked weasel-worded phrases (Mar 2009, Jun 2009, Aug 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (Mar 2009, Jun 2009, Aug 2009), Cleanup (Oct 2007) |
Comic strip «Top» | Articles lacking in-text citations (May 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (Sep 2007, Apr 2008, May 2009) |
DC Comics «Top» | Articles with specifically-marked weasel-worded phrases (Mar 2009, Aug 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (Feb 2007, Nov 2007, Dec 2008, Aug 2009) |
Dilbert «Top» | Articles with unsourced statements (Jul 2008) |
Doonesbury «Top» | Articles needing additional references (Jan 2007), Articles with unsourced statements (Aug 2008) |
Fantastic Four «Top» | Articles with unsourced statements (Sep 2007, Jan 2009, Feb 2009) |
Graphic novel «Top» | Articles lacking reliable references (Jun 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (May 2008), Cleanup (Jun 2009), Wikipedia articles needing copy edit (Jun 2009), Wikipedia introduction cleanup |
Jack Kirby «Top» | Articles with unsourced statements (Aug 2008, Nov 2008, May 2009) |
Jean Giraud «Top» | Articles with unsourced statements (Sep 2008) |
Justice League «Top» | Articles needing additional references (Aug 2009), Articles that may contain original research (Aug 2009), Wikipedia articles with plot summary needing attention (May 2009) |
Little Nemo «Top» | Articles lacking sources (May 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (Oct 2008, Mar 2009) |
Mad (magazine) «Top» | Articles with unsourced statements (May 2009) |
Manga «Top» | Articles containing potentially dated statements from 2007 |
Marvel Comics «Top» | Articles with specifically-marked weasel-worded phrases (Jun 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (Mar 2007, Apr 2008, Feb 2009, May 2009, Jun 2009), Current events (Sep 2009) |
Osamu Tezuka «Top» | Articles needing additional references (Oct 2007), Articles with unsourced statements (Feb 2007, Mar 2008) |
Peanuts «Top» | Articles needing additional references (Oct 2008), Articles with dead external links (May 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (Jun 2007, Mar 2008) |
Penciller «Top» | Articles needing additional references (May 2009) |
Popeye «Top» | Articles with specifically-marked weasel-worded phrases (Jan 2009, Jul 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (Apr 2007, Apr 2008, Oct 2008, Jan 2009, May 2009, Jun 2009, Jul 2009) |
Robert Crumb «Top» | Articles lacking in-text citations (Apr 2009) |
Stan Lee «Top» | Articles lacking in-text citations (Jan 2009), Articles that may contain original research (Dec 2008), Articles with unsourced statements (Feb 2007, Aug 2008, Dec 2008, Jan 2009, Feb 2009, Apr 2009, Aug 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations |
The Adventures of Tintin «FA, Top» | Articles with unsourced statements (Oct 2008) |
The Family Circus «Top» | Articles needing additional references (Apr 2008) |
Will Eisner «Top» | Articles needing additional references (Mar 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (Nov 2008, Jul 2009) |
Wonder Woman «Top» | Articles with dead external links (Oct 2008, Nov 2008), Articles with unsourced statements (Mar 2009) |
X-Men «Top» | Articles needing additional references (Feb 2007) |
High-importance articles
The project has 378 high-importance articles. 214 of them, or 56.6%, are flagged for cleanup. A detailed listing is suppressed due to size restrictions.
Listing by number of categories assigned
Articles with 13 cleanup categories assigned
Article | Maintenance categories |
---|---|
Mister Fantastic «High» | Articles lacking reliable references (May 2009), Articles that need to differentiate between fact and fiction, Articles to be expanded (Dec 2008), Articles with peacock terms, Articles with unsourced statements (Aug 2008, Oct 2008, Nov 2008, Apr 2009, Aug 2009), Cleanup (May 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations, Wikipedia articles needing copy edit (May 2009), Wikipedia articles needing style editing (May 2009) |
Articles with 12 cleanup categories assigned
Article | Maintenance categories |
---|---|
Sabretooth (comics) | Articles needing additional references (Sep 2008, Feb 2009), Articles to be expanded (Sep 2008), Articles with dead external links (Jan 2009, Feb 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (Oct 2008, Jan 2009, Apr 2009, May 2009, Jul 2009), Cleanup (Aug 2007), Comics articles needing issue citations |
Articles with 11 cleanup categories assigned
Article | Maintenance categories |
---|---|
Green Goblin «High» | Articles that need to differentiate between fact and fiction, Articles with unsourced statements (Jan 2009, Feb 2009, Apr 2009, Jun 2009, Jul 2009), Cleanup (Jan 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations, Wikipedia articles needing copy edit (Jan 2009), Wikipedia articles needing style editing (May 2009), Wikipedia articles with plot summary needing attention (May 2009) |
Articles with 10 cleanup categories assigned
Article | Maintenance categories |
---|---|
Fictional history of Wolverine | Articles lacking reliable references (Apr 2008), Articles needing additional references (Jul 2009), Articles to be expanded (Mar 2009), Articles to be split (Feb 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (Apr 2009, Jul 2009, Aug 2009), Cleanup (Feb 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations, Comics articles that need to differentiate between fact and fiction |
Juggernaut (comics) | Articles needing additional references (Sep 2008), Articles to be expanded (Sep 2008), Articles to be split (Aug 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (Sep 2008, Nov 2008, Apr 2009, Jun 2009, Jul 2009, Aug 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations |
Kryptonite «High» | Articles that may contain original research (Sep 2007, Feb 2008, Mar 2008, Apr 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (Jan 2008, Feb 2008, Nov 2008, Apr 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations, Wikipedia articles needing copy edit (Mar 2008) |
Mystique (comics) | Articles that need to differentiate between fact and fiction, Articles with unsourced statements (Apr 2009, May 2009, Jul 2009, Aug 2009), Cleanup (Mar 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations, Wikipedia articles needing clarification (Apr 2009), Wikipedia articles needing copy edit (Mar 2009), Wikipedia articles needing style editing (Mar 2009) |
Stan Lee «Top» | Articles lacking in-text citations (Jan 2009), Articles that may contain original research (Dec 2008), Articles with unsourced statements (Feb 2007, Aug 2008, Dec 2008, Jan 2009, Feb 2009, Apr 2009, Aug 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations |
Super Friends | Articles lacking sources (Oct 2008), Articles with specifically-marked weasel-worded phrases (Mar 2009), Articles with trivia sections (Oct 2008), Articles with unsourced statements (Jan 2008, Oct 2008, Jan 2009, Mar 2009, Apr 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations, Wikipedia articles needing clarification (Mar 2009) |
X-Force | Articles that may contain original research (Sep 2008), Articles to be expanded (Feb 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (Feb 2007, May 2007, Sep 2008), Cleanup (Sep 2008), Comics articles needing issue citations, Wikipedia articles needing copy edit (Oct 2008), Wikipedia articles needing style editing (Sep 2008), Wikipedia laundry list cleanup |
Articles with 9 cleanup categories assigned
Article | Maintenance categories |
---|---|
American comic book «Top» | Articles needing additional references (Oct 2007), Articles that may contain original research (Jul 2009), Articles with specifically-marked weasel-worded phrases (Aug 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (Feb 2007, Apr 2007, Oct 2007, Nov 2007, May 2008, Jun 2009) |
Beast Wars Neo | Articles lacking sources (Aug 2007), Articles that may contain original research (Aug 2007, Sep 2007), Articles that need to differentiate between fact and fiction, Articles with unsourced statements (Aug 2007), Cleanup (Aug 2007), Transformers articles that need to differentiate between fact and fiction, Wikipedia articles needing copy edit (Aug 2007), Wikipedia laundry list cleanup |
Beavis and Butt-head | Articles lacking reliable references (Jan 2009), Articles needing additional references (Jan 2009), Articles with sections that need to be turned into prose, Articles with unsourced statements (Feb 2007, Jan 2008, Jan 2009, Jun 2009), Cleanup (Jan 2007, Jun 2009) |
Brainiac (comics) | Articles that need to differentiate between fact and fiction, Articles with unsourced statements (Jul 2008, Oct 2008, Feb 2009, Apr 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations, Vague or ambiguous time, Wikipedia articles needing style editing (Jul 2008, Oct 2008) |
Dazzler | Articles with unsourced statements (Oct 2007, Mar 2008, Apr 2008, Jun 2008, Oct 2008, Apr 2009, May 2009, Aug 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations |
Jean Grey «High» | Articles that need to differentiate between fact and fiction, Articles to be expanded (Sep 2008), Articles with unsourced statements (Feb 2007, Jan 2008, Apr 2009, Aug 2009), Cleanup (Jun 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations, Wikipedia articles needing style editing (Jun 2009) |
Krypton (comics) | Articles lacking reliable references (Apr 2009), Articles that may contain original research (Jul 2008), Articles that need to differentiate between fact and fiction, Articles with specifically-marked weasel-worded phrases (Mar 2009), Articles with too many examples, Articles with unsourced statements (Dec 2006, Feb 2007, Feb 2008, Nov 2008) |
Luke Cage | Articles needing additional references (Dec 2008), Articles that need to differentiate between fact and fiction, Articles with unsourced statements (Apr 2008, Oct 2008, Mar 2009, Apr 2009, Jun 2009, Aug 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations |
Magneto (comics) «High» | Articles lacking reliable references (Aug 2009), Articles needing additional references (Dec 2008, Jan 2009), Articles to be expanded (Sep 2008), Articles with unsourced statements (Jun 2009, Jul 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations, Comics articles that need to differentiate between fact and fiction, Wikipedia articles with incorrect tenses |
Nick Fury «High» | Articles with trivia sections (Sep 2008), Articles with unsourced statements (Apr 2007, Oct 2007, Aug 2008, Oct 2008, Nov 2008, Apr 2009, Aug 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations |
Popeye «Top» | Articles with specifically-marked weasel-worded phrases (Jan 2009, Jul 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (Apr 2007, Apr 2008, Oct 2008, Jan 2009, May 2009, Jun 2009, Jul 2009) |
Professor X «High» | Articles that may contain original research (Nov 2008), Articles that need to differentiate between fact and fiction, Articles to be expanded (Sep 2008), Articles with unsourced statements (Oct 2008, Nov 2008, Apr 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations, Wikipedia articles with plot summary needing attention (Jan 2008, Aug 2009) |
She-Hulk | Articles needing additional references (Jul 2008), Articles needing more detailed references, Articles with unsourced statements (Jul 2008, Oct 2008, Dec 2008, Apr 2009, Jun 2009, Jul 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations |
Sovereign Seven | Articles lacking sources (Oct 2008), Articles that need to differentiate between fact and fiction, Articles with specifically-marked weasel-worded phrases (Oct 2008), Articles with unsourced statements (Apr 2008, Oct 2008), Cleanup (Oct 2008), Wikipedia articles needing copy edit (Oct 2008), Wikipedia articles needing style editing (Oct 2008), Wikipedia introduction cleanup |
Uatu | Articles lacking reliable references (May 2009), Articles that may contain original research (May 2009), Articles that need to differentiate between fact and fiction, Articles with peacock terms, Articles with unsourced statements (May 2009, Aug 2009), Cleanup (May 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations, Wikipedia articles needing copy edit (May 2009) |
WildStorm Productions «High» | Articles needing additional references (Jun 2007, Aug 2008), Articles with specifically-marked weasel-worded phrases (May 2009, Aug 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (Feb 2007, Jun 2007, Feb 2009, Jun 2009, Aug 2009) |
Articles with 8 cleanup categories assigned
Article | Maintenance categories |
---|---|
Beast (comics) | Articles lacking reliable references (Jan 2008), Articles to be expanded (Sep 2008), Articles with unsourced statements (Aug 2008, Apr 2009, Aug 2009, Sep 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations, Wikipedia articles with plot summary needing attention (Nov 2008) |
Bullseye (comics) | Articles to be expanded (Mar 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (Dec 2008, Apr 2009, May 2009, Jun 2009, Jul 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations, Wikipedia articles with incorrect tenses |
Comic book «Top» | Articles lacking reliable references (Nov 2007), Articles with specifically-marked weasel-worded phrases (Mar 2009, Jun 2009, Aug 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (Mar 2009, Jun 2009, Aug 2009), Cleanup (Oct 2007) |
Frank Miller (comics) «High» | Articles lacking reliable references (Oct 2007, Dec 2008), Articles that may contain original research (Oct 2007), Articles to be expanded (Aug 2007), Articles with unsourced statements (Sep 2008, Dec 2008, Jan 2009), BLP articles lacking sources |
Kingpin (comics) «High» | Articles with dead external links (Oct 2008), Articles with unsourced statements (Oct 2008, Nov 2008, Apr 2009, May 2009, Jul 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations, Wikipedia articles needing style editing (Apr 2009) |
Magik (comics) | Articles lacking sources (Apr 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (Aug 2008, Sep 2008, Apr 2009, Aug 2009), Cleanup (Mar 2009, Apr 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations |
Nightcrawler (comics) | Articles needing additional references (Sep 2008), Articles with unsourced statements (Mar 2007, Oct 2008, Nov 2008, Apr 2009, May 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations, Comics articles that need to differentiate between fact and fiction |
S.H.I.E.L.D. | Articles lacking reliable references (Jan 2009), Articles needing additional references (Jan 2009), Articles with trivia sections (Jul 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (Feb 2007, Oct 2008, Nov 2008, Jan 2009, Jul 2009) |
Silver Surfer «High» | Articles that need to differentiate between fact and fiction, Articles with dead external links (Aug 2009), Articles with improper non-free content, Articles with unsourced statements (Mar 2008, Nov 2008, Apr 2009, Aug 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations |
Superhero «High» | Articles that may contain original research (Sep 2007), Articles with unsourced statements (Feb 2007, Mar 2007, Oct 2007, Nov 2007, Jan 2008, Jul 2008, Jan 2009) |
Surge (comics) | Articles needing additional references (Oct 2008), Articles with unsourced statements (Nov 2007, Apr 2009, May 2009, Jul 2009), Cleanup (Sep 2007), Comics articles needing cleanup, Comics articles needing issue citations |
The Cisco Kid | Articles to be expanded (Aug 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (Aug 2009), Cleanup (Aug 2009), Wikify (Aug 2009), Wikipedia articles needing clarification (Aug 2009), Wikipedia articles needing reorganization, Wikipedia articles needing rewrite (Aug 2009), Wikipedia articles needing style editing (Aug 2009) |
Thing (comics) «High» | Articles needing additional references (Oct 2006), Articles with unsourced statements (Nov 2007, Jun 2008, Apr 2009, May 2009, Jul 2009, Aug 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations |
Tokyopop | Articles lacking reliable references (Dec 2007), Articles needing expert attention (Feb 2009), Cleanup (Mar 2007, Dec 2007), Miscellaneous articles needing expert attention, Wikipedia articles in need of updating, Wikipedia articles needing reorganization, Wikipedia articles needing style editing (Dec 2007) |
Articles with 7 cleanup categories assigned
Article | Maintenance categories |
---|---|
A Modest Destiny | Articles containing potentially dated statements from 2006, Articles lacking reliable references (Sep 2007), Articles that may contain original research (Sep 2007), Articles to be expanded (Sep 2007), Articles with sections that need to be turned into prose, Articles with unsourced statements (Feb 2007), Cleanup (Sep 2007) |
Black Widow (Marvel Comics) | Articles with dead external links (Oct 2008), Articles with unsourced statements (Oct 2008, Apr 2009, May 2009, Jul 2009, Aug 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations |
Cannonball (comics) | Articles lacking reliable references (Jan 2008), Articles needing additional references (Mar 2009), Articles that need to differentiate between fact and fiction, Articles with unsourced statements (Apr 2009, Jul 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations, Wikipedia articles with plot summary needing attention (Nov 2008) |
Electro (Marvel Comics) | Articles to be expanded (Sep 2008), Articles with unsourced statements (Nov 2008, Jan 2009, Apr 2009, Aug 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations, Comics articles that need to differentiate between fact and fiction |
Forge (comics) | Articles with unsourced statements (Jan 2008, Nov 2008, Apr 2009, May 2009, Jun 2009, Jul 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations |
Hal Jordan «High» | Articles lacking reliable references (Aug 2009), Articles that may contain original research (Mar 2009), Articles with dead external links (May 2008), Articles with unsourced statements (Feb 2007, Mar 2007, Mar 2009), Wikipedia articles needing clarification (Mar 2009) |
Jesse Blaze Snider | Articles lacking reliable references (Mar 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (Mar 2009, May 2009), Cleanup (Mar 2009), NPOV disputes (Mar 2009), Wikify (Mar 2009), Wikipedia articles needing style editing (Mar 2009) |
List of characters in Megatokyo | Articles lacking reliable references (Jul 2008), Articles that may contain original research (Sep 2008, Dec 2008), Articles that need to differentiate between fact and fiction, Articles with trivia sections (Feb 2008), Articles with unsourced statements (Sep 2008), Cleanup (Jul 2008) |
List of DC Multiverse worlds «High» | Articles with dead external links (Dec 2008), Articles with unsourced statements (May 2008, Sep 2008, Nov 2008, Aug 2009), Wikipedia articles needing clarification (Jul 2009), Wikipedia articles needing style editing (Nov 2008) |
List of female comics creators | Articles needing additional references (Jan 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (Mar 2008, Jun 2008, Jul 2008, Aug 2008, Sep 2008), Cleanup (Jan 2009) |
List of Green Lanterns | Articles lacking sources (Aug 2009), Articles that may contain original research (Feb 2009), Articles that need to differentiate between fact and fiction, Articles to be merged (Apr 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (Feb 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations, Wikipedia articles needing style editing (Feb 2009) |
Manga outside Japan «High» | Articles that may contain original research (Jun 2009), Articles with specifically-marked weasel-worded phrases (Jun 2009, Aug 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (Mar 2009, Jun 2009, Aug 2009), Vague or ambiguous time |
Marvel Comics «Top» | Articles with specifically-marked weasel-worded phrases (Jun 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (Mar 2007, Apr 2008, Feb 2009, May 2009, Jun 2009), Current events (Sep 2009) |
Marvel Nemesis: Rise of the Imperfects (comics) | Articles lacking reliable references (Oct 2008), Articles that need to differentiate between fact and fiction, Cleanup (Oct 2008), Wikipedia articles needing copy edit (Oct 2008), Wikipedia articles needing style editing (Oct 2008), Wikipedia articles with plot summary needing attention (Oct 2008), Wikipedia introduction cleanup |
Mary Jane Watson «High» | Articles lacking in-text citations (Oct 2008), Articles needing additional references (Mar 2008, Jul 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (Apr 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations, Wikipedia articles needing style editing (Apr 2008), Wikipedia articles with plot summary needing attention (Apr 2009) |
Meggan | Articles needing additional references (Sep 2008), Articles that may contain original research (Sep 2009), Articles to be expanded (Sep 2008), Articles with unsourced statements (Feb 2009, Apr 2009, Sep 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations |
One Year Later | Articles lacking reliable references (Aug 2009), Articles that need to differentiate between fact and fiction, Articles with unsourced statements (Feb 2007, Apr 2009, May 2009, Aug 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations |
Rachel Summers | Articles needing additional references (Apr 2009, May 2009), Articles that need to differentiate between fact and fiction, Articles with unsourced statements (Nov 2008, Jul 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations, Wikipedia articles needing copy edit (Jun 2009) |
Reboot (fiction) | Accuracy disputes (Apr 2009), Articles needing additional references (Oct 2007, Dec 2007, May 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (Apr 2009, May 2009, Jun 2009) |
Richard Branson | Articles with dead external links (Mar 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (Feb 2007, Apr 2007, Jun 2007, Jul 2007, Oct 2008, Aug 2009) |
Rogue (comics) | Articles to be expanded (Sep 2008), Articles with unsourced statements (Oct 2008, Apr 2009, May 2009, Jul 2009, Aug 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations |
X-Men: The Manga | Articles lacking sources (Oct 2008), Articles to be expanded (Jul 2008, Oct 2008), Articles with sections that need to be turned into prose, Cleanup (Apr 2007, Oct 2008), Wikify (Jun 2008) |