User talk:Trillfendi/Archive 2
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Trillfendi. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
Rosamund Pike's birthday
Hi Trillfendi, while I do consider it likely that Pike was born in January, Aquarius actually stretches well into February, doesn't it? --Niels Wrschowitz (talk) 09:06, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
- @Niels Wrschowitz: Aquarians can be born in February too but according to this business registry she was born in January regardless (though the date is redacted for everyone in this system). Trillfendi (talk) 12:37, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Proposed Women in Green Editathon
Hello Trillfendi -- With the goal of helping to progress the WikiProject Women in Green (WiG) women’s rights-themed GA nomination goal for 2021, I’m proposing that WiG hold a special editathon event in the fall (maybe October/November?). I can assist with logistics, but I need to know how much interest/support there might be from WiG participants first. Please let me know what you think in the talk page conversation! All the best, Alanna the Brave (talk) 02:31, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
August Editathons with Women in Red
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:27, 23 July 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Your draft article, Draft:Abby Champion
Hello, Trillfendi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Abby Champion".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 19:06, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Alice Metza
Hello, Trillfendi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Alice Metza".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 19:11, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Josie Canseco for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Josie Canseco (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Rollback usage
Please see WP:ROLLBACKUSE. You should not use the rollback tool to revert good faith editors, even if you disagree with them. The rollback tool is primarily for obvious vandalism. If you have any questions, feel free to ask me or another user. Cheers ‡ El cid, el campeador talk 15:27, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
- @El cid, el campeador: If something is disruptive it’s equivalent to vandalism as far as I’m concerned. Trillfendi (talk) 15:35, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
- Well, respectfully, your opinion does not override the actual WP policy on the issue. ‡ El cid, el campeador talk 15:39, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
September 2021 at Women in Red
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 22:31, 26 August 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
October 2021 at Women in Red
Special event:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 01:37, 29 September 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Welcome to the Months of African Cinema Global Contest!
Greetings!
The AfroCine Project core team is happy to inform you that the Months of African Cinema Contest is happening again this year in October and November. We invite Wikipedians all over the world to join in improving content related to African cinema on Wikipedia!
Please list your username under the participants’ section of the contest page to indicate your interest in participating in this contest. The term "African" in the context of this contest, includes people of African descent from all over the world, which includes the diaspora and the Caribbean.
The following prizes would be recognized at the end of the contest:
- Overall winner
- 1st - $500
- 2nd - $200
- 3rd - $100
- Diversity winner - $100
- Gender-gap fillers - $100
- Language Winners - up to $100*
Also look out for local prizes from affiliates in your countries or communities! For further information about the contest, the prizes and how to participate, please visit the contest page here. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. We look forward to your participation.--Jamie Tubers (talk) 23:20, 30th September 2021 (UTC)
Ýou can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list
Behavior
Hello there! I know you are the creator of the Hoyeon page but I think your attitude needs to be toned down. There will be other editors coming and going when editing her edit page, but if it is changed, either fix it or add a note informing future editors what changes you do not want changed. You are your own editor here, so please make sure to stay professional. Btspurplegalaxy (talk) 16:09, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Btspurplegalaxy: What I will not do is sit by and watch a legacy be erased. Trillfendi (talk) 17:42, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
- It doesn't have to be erased but just watch your tone. You don't have to cuss up a storm just because something was changed. Btspurplegalaxy (talk) 17:45, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Btspurplegalaxy: I'm sorry you feel that way. When you create a page that has random people ransacking it and calling the subject "hot" maybe you'll understand the missionary zeal and righteous indignation. I'm not saying it's right, I'm not saying it's wrong, Trillfendi (talk) 17:59, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
- You do not own the articles you create, so there's no need to heavily monitor it. It doesn't matter that you created it as any article here is open to be edited by all users. Of course there will be edits that are not constructive but they can simply be reverted. She has skyrocketed in popularity so it's normal that her page will get a lot of traffic and that there will be pesky IP users from time to time but it's not something that can't be regulated. Btspurplegalaxy (talk) 18:14, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Btspurplegalaxy: The thing is you've never seen me say I "own" the article. I said there is a certain stake one feels when they create a page and have tracked the subject's career for years. Meanwhile, skyrocketing in popularity doesn't mean that important details get thrown out with the bathwater for the sake of a fad. Twice already I've had to have this page protected (and guess what... anyone else can ask for the same thing). Trillfendi (talk) 18:32, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
- Anyways my main point to you is just watch your tone. I'll leave you with that. Btspurplegalaxy (talk) 18:41, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Btspurplegalaxy: The thing is you've never seen me say I "own" the article. I said there is a certain stake one feels when they create a page and have tracked the subject's career for years. Meanwhile, skyrocketing in popularity doesn't mean that important details get thrown out with the bathwater for the sake of a fad. Twice already I've had to have this page protected (and guess what... anyone else can ask for the same thing). Trillfendi (talk) 18:32, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
- You do not own the articles you create, so there's no need to heavily monitor it. It doesn't matter that you created it as any article here is open to be edited by all users. Of course there will be edits that are not constructive but they can simply be reverted. She has skyrocketed in popularity so it's normal that her page will get a lot of traffic and that there will be pesky IP users from time to time but it's not something that can't be regulated. Btspurplegalaxy (talk) 18:14, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Btspurplegalaxy: I'm sorry you feel that way. When you create a page that has random people ransacking it and calling the subject "hot" maybe you'll understand the missionary zeal and righteous indignation. I'm not saying it's right, I'm not saying it's wrong, Trillfendi (talk) 17:59, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
- It doesn't have to be erased but just watch your tone. You don't have to cuss up a storm just because something was changed. Btspurplegalaxy (talk) 17:45, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Agency information for Hoyeon
Hi - Hope all is well. We know that Hoyeon's page is getting hit by a ton of updates. We are guilty of this as we had tried to update the link to our agency in her profile a few days ago [1]. We have noticed that the agencies listed have changed and no longer reflect the correct full list agencies that manage her and are listed in models.com [2] This includes the removal of Nomad Management from her page. Just wanted to point it out to you rather than clog the updates and do it incorrectly. Thank you for creating her page.
Nomad Creative (talk) 23:47, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Nomad Creative: Somebody unwisely removed it despite it being sourced right there in the infobox. I have now reinstated it, because she is still, of course, on the board. And I appreciate your recognition, I knew she was a star all the way back then. Now she's a supernova. Trillfendi (talk) 15:11, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Rachel Weisz's age.
Hi, I was the one who changed Rachel Weisz's birth year to "1970 or 1971". I read the talk page discussion pertaining Weisz's age and the "confirmation" of her 1970 birth year revolved around a primary source (a Birth Registry/Index) with mentions that it can be accessed through genealogy websites like Ancestry.com. WP:BLPPRIMARY and WP:ANCESTRY.COM state against using primary sources. WP:BLPPRIMARY states: "Do not use ... other court records, or other public documents, to support assertions about a living person. Do not use public records that include personal details, such as date of birth ...", as I also noticed that you had added a citation to primary sources (Birth registry) through a genealogy website (Findmypast) similar to Ancestry.com. As it stands, it looks like non-primary, reliable sources have given conflicting birth years, either 1970 or 1971. Clear Looking Glass (talk) 22:49, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
November 2021 at Women in Red
|
--Innisfree987 (talk) 21:33, 24 October 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Please review and publish a draft of the article entitled (J. Mario Belougi). Thank you.
Please review and publish a draft of the article entitled (J. Mario Belougi). Thank you. Christiani E. Landjaro (talk) 12:48, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Christiani E. Landjaro: I don't have page reviewer rights. Trillfendi (talk) 15:45, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Elizabeth Sulcer
Hello. I come here because I believe you to be very knowledgeable about the fashion industry and what merits inclusion on Wikipedia. The article Elizabeth Sulcer is about a stylist. For context, this article came to light at the COI noticeboard in this discussion. It appears a user started a number of articles about friends and family. The conflict of interest aside, my main question for you, is this stylist notable? (Please note, as a result of the COI discussion the article has seen some trimming in the last 24 hours.) Cheers, --SVTCobra 22:31, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
- @SVTCobra: I would say she is a notable stylist in that she has styled notable people (for example, Bella Hadid) at notable events (e.g. Cannes Film Festival) where the red carpet is as important as the movie or award. Trillfendi (talk) 22:42, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
- OK, thanks. I find it fascinating that you cited an example that's not even in the article. Thanks again, --SVTCobra 22:57, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
Ways to improve Chaikra Shanti Maximus
Hello, Trillfendi,
Thank you for creating Chaikra Shanti Maximus.
I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
Hi Trillfendi! I just reviewed your article Chaikra Shanti Maximus as part of WP:NPP's November Backlog drive. I tagged it with the notability tag for WP:BIO - That's mostly because a lot of the sourcing seems to be trivial coverage. You might think about trying to find more coverage specific to her, rather than the passing mentions she has in a lot of them. That said, I think the two awards may be enough to meet notability.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|ThadeusOfNazereth}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
ThadeusOfNazerethTalk to Me! 21:10, 3 November 2021 (UTC) @ThadeusOfNazereth: Thanks for reviewing. I understood notability would be a concern (not that much info can be found for now, but then again she’s still a teenager) but in my opinion the Financial Times interview and Vogue choosing her as one of the top new models of the season satisfied the smallest part of notability beyond the campaigns and what not. Trillfendi (talk) 21:29, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
- Hello again! Coming back to that interview with fresh eyes this morning, I agree w/you - I think it's in-depth enough to supplement the others, and with the awards we're probably fine. As an aside, when I leave talk page comments with the page curation workflow, I almost never look at the user beforehand - Had I seen the paragraph you had on discussing notability/NMODEL, I would've left it alone :). ThadeusOfNazerethTalk to Me! 09:19, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
Saldana
"Support I've been waiting for this day (as a fan) since about 2005. Trillfendi (talk) 18:29, 1 November 2021 (UTC)"
- You're quite right, but still a shame about Ivanovic. In ictu oculi (talk) 21:24, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
Reverted your edit
Hi, I am Appu, I just reverted your this edit on Joe Biden, I have reasoned for it in here. Thank you. Appu (talk) 03:11, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 7
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Madison Stubbington, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Advertising Standards Authority.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Hyun Ji Shin
Hello! Your submission of Hyun Ji Shin at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! feminist (+) 14:22, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
The Months of African Cinema Contest Continues in November!
Greetings,
It is already past the middle of the contest and we are really excited about the Months of African Contest 2021 achievements so far! We want to extend our sincere gratitude for the time and energy you have invested. If you have not yet participated in the contest, it is not too late to do it. Please list your username as a participant on the contest’s main page.
Please remember to list the articles you have improved or created on the article achievements' section of the contest page so they can be tracked. In order to win prizes, be sure to also list your article in the users by articles. Please note that your articles must be present in both the article achievement section on the main contest page, as well as on the Users By Articles page for you to qualify for a prize.
We would be awarding prizes to different categories of winners:
- Overall winner
- 1st - $500
- 2nd - $200
- 3rd - $100
- Diversity winner - $100
- Gender-gap filler - $100
- Language Winners - up to $100*
Thank you once again for your valued participation! --Jamie Tubers (talk) 18:50, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
You can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list
Incomplete DYK nomination
Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Hyun Ji Shin at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 01:09, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Hi Trillfendi, I just accepted this article about a model from the Warhol era. It needs some sprucing and thought you might be interested, although you likely have enough on your plate. S0091 (talk) 01:08, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
Adut Akech image
Greetings, my expert of modern fashion models! I added a few Coperni video images to model articles, but I would like you to check the one I put on Adut Akech. It's a great image in itself, and it is from https://vimeo.com/523710704 which says it contains Adut Akech, and from comparing it to other images of her it should be an image of Adut Akech, but considering the incident in her article documented at https://www.cnn.com/style/article/adut-akech-who-magazine-error-intl-scli/index.html I really, really, really don't want to put up a picture of a different model and get it wrong. Could you please double check and confirm that yes, this is her? Thank you! --GRuban (talk) 15:20, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
- @GRuban: Yes, that’s Adut Akech. Trillfendi (talk) 15:48, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
Thank you --GRuban (talk) 16:01, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
McDormand
Thank you for this edit. I would have done that myself if I had the know-how, which is why I suggested it in my edit summary. I really appreciate your efforts. Unschool 04:03, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 18
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mika Schneider (model), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Valentino.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
DYK for Rebecca Leigh Longendyke
On 21 November 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Rebecca Leigh Longendyke, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that fashion model Rebecca Leigh Longendyke was inspired by Grey's Anatomy to get a degree in biomedical engineering? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Rebecca Leigh Longendyke. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Rebecca Leigh Longendyke), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
 | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
December 2021 at Women in Red
|
--Innisfree987 (talk) 00:13, 27 November 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Disambiguation link notification for November 29
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bree Warren, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cosmopolitan.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Daisy (perfume)
Hello! Your submission of Daisy (perfume) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 05:28, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
DYK for Hyun Ji Shin
On 20 December 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Hyun Ji Shin, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Hyun Ji Shin was photographed by Karl Lagerfeld in his Chanel campaign before his death? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Hyun Ji Shin. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Hyun Ji Shin), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
|
|
Hook update | |
| Your hook reached 6,233 views (519.4 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of December 2021 – nice work! |
theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/she) 01:22, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
January 2022 Women in Red
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:03, 28 December 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Big Four
Hi, you previously participated in the Big Four international beauty pageants Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Big Four international beauty pageants (2nd nomination) and I'm notifying all the previous participants since the article is currently nominated for deletion for the third time in this link: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Big Four international beauty pageants (3rd nomination) in case you want to chime in.---Richie Campbell (talk) 06:58, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Kendra Sunderland for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kendra Sunderland until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Discretionary sanctions alerts
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Firefangledfeathers 21:51, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
- @Firefangledfeathers: I fix a birth place in accordance with the actual guideline, none of this is controversial, and I'm supposed to then be scared of some "sanctions"? Trillfendi (talk) 22:01, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
- I hope you're not scared! Big emphasis on the "does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions". Firefangledfeathers 22:03, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
DYK for Daisy (perfume)
On 3 January 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Daisy (perfume), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Marc Jacobs's fragrance Daisy is cottagecore? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Daisy (perfume). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Daisy (perfume)), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Your GA nomination of Timothée Chalamet
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Timothée Chalamet you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of FormalDude -- FormalDude (talk) 08:00, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Nicole Hernandez Hammer
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Nicole Hernandez Hammer you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Edwininlondon -- Edwininlondon (talk) 12:01, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
DYK for Alisha Kramer
On 14 January 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Alisha Kramer, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Alisha Kramer worked to fight HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis, and inequity in women's health in Africa and Europe as a program coordinator for the Center for Strategic and International Studies? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Alisha Kramer. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Alisha Kramer), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
DYK for Vivienne Rohner
On 27 January 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Vivienne Rohner, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that fashion model Vivienne Rohner, named after fashion designer Vivienne Westwood, opened one of Westwood's shows during her first season as a model? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Vivienne Rohner. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Vivienne Rohner), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Linking on Nicholas Hoult
When you said we literally cannot put [[ ]] on a nonexistent article
,[1] did you mean to say that we should include Holly's most complete (and sourceable) name because she doesn't have her own article and that it would be appropriate to simply link Bryana Holly once she does have her own article? KyleJoantalk 17:37, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
- @KyleJoan: Pretty much. Trillfendi (talk) 17:47, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Well, WP:BLPPRIVACY applies in all BLP articles, so that name's inclusion in an article about Holly would also be a violation of that policy. The overarching point about whether to include the name is not that it would be in Holly's article, therefore, it should be in Hoult's article; it is that it wouldn't be in Holly's article, therefore, it shouldn't be in Hoult's article. KyleJoantalk 03:05, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Model images advice
I found a Creative Commons Attribution licensed video from Paco Rabanne and was able to extract images for 10 models that we had articles for but no images. Most were written by you. So, first: hope you like! Second, I'd like your advice. I made a headshot and a full length image from each for each article; some images are better than others, some articles are longer than others so have more room, then there is the Noordhoff case, which are great images, but really not the best for showing what she looks like - in short, I put these all in, but do some of these need to be removed? There may be a few other similar videos, and I'd appreciate your learned guidance for next time.
--GRuban (talk) 17:21, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
- @GRuban: I think the one of Felice Noordhoff can stand to be removed because her face is too obscured. I can tell it's her, but the average person wouldn't have any idea. Trillfendi (talk) 17:58, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you
Done--GRuban (talk) 21:19, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
February with Women in Red
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:11, 31 January 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
ITN recognition for Cheslie Kryst
On 1 February 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Cheslie Kryst, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. SpencerT•C 00:56, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
Incomplete DYK nomination
Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Alisha Kramer at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 03:21, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
Shia LaBeouf
Your edit summary for adding in that they are expecting made me chuckle lol LADY LOTUS • TALK 14:47, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
WP:AFC Helper News
Hello! I wanted to drop a quick note for all of our AFC participants; nothing huge and fancy like a newsletter, but a few points of interest.
- AFCH will now show live previews of the comment to be left on a decline.
- The template {{db-afc-move}} has been created - this template is similar to {{db-move}} when there is a redirect in the way of an acceptance, but specifically tells the patrolling admin to let you (the draft reviewer) take care of the actual move.
Short and sweet, but there's always more to discuss at WT:AFC. Stop on by, maybe review a draft on the way? Whether you're one of our top reviewers, or haven't reviewed in a while, I want to thank you for helping out in the past and in the future. Cheers, Primefac, via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:00, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
COI change on Chanel
Greetings! I have seen you have made a recent change on Chanel. Are you able to help make a few more factual changes as I have a COI. Details in the request page https://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Talk:Chanel#requestedit Occasionalpedestrian (talk) 14:13, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
First sentence on Angelina Jolie
Pardon me for once again asking you about your edit summary. When you wrote the whole world knows her as Angelina Jolie
, were you suggesting that only one's common name is suitable for the lead sentence? Or do you deem this article a special case since "Jolie" is present in every name listed? It doesn't seem helpful or appropriate to give readers the impression that "Angelina Jolie" is the sole name that matters since she's always been "Angelina Jolie something". Not only have I never seen a BLP format a birth name or different legal names that way, but that's not compatible with MOS:MULTINAMES. KyleJoantalk 04:18, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
March editathons
|
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:38, 27 February 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Malika Louback main space
I have taken the liberty of expanding your draft and moving it to main space. Hope that's all right. You may recall it was one of your articles that I added model images to - except unlike all the others it was just a draft. That just itched! 
I'm also hoping to nominate it for DYK. --GRuban (talk) 16:42, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks, I see you tweaked some things, so I'm guessing you're happy. Nominated. One minor question, though, this source https://www.stylist.fr/malika-louback-la-mannequin-que-les-maisons-de-mode-s-arrachent,313968.asp is "MALIKA LOUBACK, REINE DES PODIUMS", which literally means "Malika Louback, queen of the podiums". I am highly tempted to translate "podium" in this case as "runway" or "catwalk" or something, on the theory that this is what they mean. In English, at least, a podium is somewhere where you stand, not really where you walk; I don't suppose you know whether in French modeling runways or catwalks are called podiums? --GRuban (talk) 19:59, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
- Never mind, figured it out, by following the Francais link from catwalk: "nom anglais du podium ou de la piste sur laquelle marchent les modèles lors de présentations de mode". Yes, that's what's meant.--GRuban (talk) 20:02, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
- @GRuban: I was gonna say in French, podium can also mean runway in that context, though they could’ve said défilé. Trillfendi (talk) 20:08, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you, runways it is! --GRuban (talk) 20:12, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
Just saw your comment: [2] Yeah. I had nominated another that might have been fitting, but didn't make it either, for more complex reasons: Wikipedia_talk:Did_you_know#Yulia_Tolopa_hook Ah well. Plenty of deserving articles. --GRuban (talk) 19:41, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
Precious anniversary
 | |
| Two years! |
|---|
- Prayer for Ukraine --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:02, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
April Editathons from Women in Red
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:46, 22 March 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Concern regarding Draft:Daniel Jackson (fashion photographer)
Hello, Trillfendi. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Daniel Jackson (fashion photographer), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:01, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Timothée Chalamet
The article Timothée Chalamet you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold 
. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Timothée Chalamet for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of FormalDude -- FormalDude (talk) 03:40, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Timothée Chalamet
The article Timothée Chalamet you nominated as a good article has passed 
; see Talk:Timothée Chalamet for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of FormalDude -- FormalDude (talk) 22:21, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Nicole Hernandez Hammer
The article Nicole Hernandez Hammer you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Nicole Hernandez Hammer for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Edwininlondon -- Edwininlondon (talk) 08:00, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Nicole Hernandez Hammer
The article Nicole Hernandez Hammer you nominated as a good article has failed 
; see Talk:Nicole Hernandez Hammer for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Edwininlondon -- Edwininlondon (talk) 22:01, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
DYK for Malika Louback
On 30 March 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Malika Louback, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Malika Louback believes her three engineering degrees make her a better fashion model? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Malika Louback. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Malika Louback), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Concern regarding Draft:Amanda Wellsh
Hello, Trillfendi. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Amanda Wellsh, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:02, 8 April 2022 (UTC)