Talk:Rachel Weisz

Latest comment: 1 month ago by Cagliost in topic Date of birth
Good articleRachel Weisz has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
February 10, 2011Good article nomineeListed
March 8, 2011Featured article candidateNot promoted
Current status: Good article

Date of birth

edit

Per WP:DOB: If multiple independent reliable sources state differing years or dates of birth in conflict, include all birth dates/years for which a reliable source exists, clearly noting discrepancies. In this situation, editors must not include only one date/year which they consider "most likely", or include merely a single date from one of two or more reliable sources. Original research must not be used to extrapolate the date of birth.

The article currently fails to meet this standard quite badly, given it picks one date to display on the page and relegates the rest to an efn. Further, the efn includes a sentence of original research. I will remove the OR in a moment, but I not in a position at the moment to fully un-pick and fix this part of the page. I'm therefore leaving this message on the talk page in case anyone else is able to fix it in the meantime. JustAnotherCompanion (talk) 21:23, 11 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Do not do this. Please review the discussion at Talk:Rachel Weisz/Archive 2. cagliost (talk) 10:10, 24 October 2024 (UTC)Reply