User talk:RHaworth/2018 Nov 16

Post your questions at the bottom of the talk page, not the top, and sign them properly. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:49, 27 October 2018 (UTC)
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
Hi I was just wondering why you deleted this article, my biography is simple and please help me , my page is NISHA MANDANI. — Preceding unsigned comment added by user:Nisha Mandani (talk • contribs)

Emotional Speech Blocks Deletion Syndrome

[Title width guide. Delete above here if no further edits - already in archive. If further edits, move below here.]

Requesting de-activation of old account

Hi, I am the editor who had previously created those sockpuppet accounts without knowing the rules about sockpuppeting which was over a year ago. The account Retiredwrestler was an account that I had made for a former wrestler friend of mine named Verne Seibert, who after I had created it said he did not want it. After I had learned that socking was against the rules I was ashamed of what I did, and have not re-offended since. I was told by the Wikipedia administrator who had blocked that account that I could have it unblocked and changed to another name and give it to a person who wants to start a Wikipedia account. I tried to do this, but I found it very difficult and won't probably be able to do it unless I can find someone who knows how to do this. Since I have made countless contributions to Wikipedia and wasn't aware of the socking policy I think I should be able to de-activate the account as I want to be able to put this all behind me now. When I tried to de-activate the account I see that you wouldn't allow this. Can you please let me de-activate the account now. If you don't let me do that the only other option which I might have is to de-activate my current account and start all over again which I don't want to do, since I have come so far on Wikipedia. I promise you that if you let me de-activate this account that I will NEVER sock again as I truly have learned my lesson, and I deserve to make amends for what I have done wrong. — Davidgoodheart (talk) 17:59, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

• "De-activate" is an undefined term - what exactly did you do to "try to de-activate the account". What are you fussing about? The Davidgoodheart account is not blocked. Be prepared to admit to the follies of your youth. By all means add your story above to the user:Retiredwrestler page. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 19:10, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
• In fact I would say that blocking an account could be described as de-activation. So your request has already been actioned. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 09:17, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

Hello again, pertaining to the account Retiredwrestler, may I request for it to be it deleted, please, so it will come red and now longer show up as a sockpuppet when it is clicked on. I now realize the term "de-activation" was not the right phrasing. — Davidgoodheart (talk) 22:50, 27 October 2018 (UTC)

• You are still not using the right phrasing! accounts cannot be deleted. However it would be possible to delete the user page. I have no objection to doing so. Go ahead and ask DeltaQuad who applied the {{sock}} tag to delete the page. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 01:01, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

Deletion of Oval Office Tapes

Hi there, I recently created a draft of the Oval Office Tapes page and was given a week to receive the copyright to the image I used, however, I found this morning that the entire draft had been deleted. I completely understand, as there was no copyright provided for the image, but I'm requesting to have the text of draft:Oval Office Tapes restored, as I'm in the process of obtaining the rights. For the time being, I can remove the image, provided the draft is restored. Thank you so much! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jgelberg007 (talk • contribs) 20:38, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

• What is all this rubbish about the image? The page was deleted because the text, now emailed to you, was a copyvio. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 09:17, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

Thanks, what was the copyright violated in the text? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jgelberg007 (talk • contribs)

• I cannot remember. Oval Office Tapes seems OK. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 12:38, 26 October 2018 (UTC)

Environmental Health

Hi re: Draft:International Federation of Environmental Health - all text deleted? https://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Draft:International_Federation_of_Environmental_Health I got the standard message re Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:International Federation of Environmental Health, (here)

I understand your G11 section concerns but would challmeg them however but the message (sent less than 12 hours ago at 4am local time) says [redacted - use a link instead!]. It's been deleted before I read the message - so objecting or improving it seems particularly hard!

For the record I'm not at all associated with the organisation, nor do I even work in that field. I was researching some other matters (on World Environmental Health Day - listed at https://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/List_of_environmental_dates ) and wanted to know what/who had created it - IFEH is listed but unexplained. So I found that this organisation had no entry at all but appears to be the main international EHO organisation.

As I recall I listed not only the organistion's own website, and brief summary of its stated puspose (is that inappropriate?) but also supporting citations and references to other international organisations inclduing academic and government websites and conferences. Format and layout may have needed some improvement - but I thought that was the type of content needed. (I'd looked at https://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations - and I think it's a notable organisation.) I see you are an experienced Wikipedia editor so while I tried to follow the templates if you have an example of a better similar article or specific comments I'd be grateful to see them, or have your help.

If things are deleted so rapidly without a copy available or a chance to amend them - even if only in draft form - it hardly makes me keen to bother doing more for wikipedia. I've done enough writing to be happy at challenges over content, policy or other constructive cricitism, but being told that "you may contest the nomination" when it is already seems to be too late is really quite disheartening.

Can you help? Pauldavey (talk) 13:29, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

• FYI, I responded to the editor on my Talk page: #Response. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:24, 25 October 2018 (UTC)

• You really do not deserve it: you probably have a CoI; you are far too long-winded; you clutter this page with an ugly bit of unwanted <pre> text and you cannot do wikilinks. But I do feel that in draft space people should be allowed time to fix spamminess so I have restored draft:International Federation of Environmental Health and request K.e.coffman to let the review process run its course. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 12:38, 26 October 2018 (UTC)

Deleted Page Kuk Sool Won

Mr. Haworth, I'm a bit new to Wikipedia, so please forgive my ignorance of protocols. I'm researching the history of the Korean martial art Kuk Sool Won. The Wikipedia page on Kuk Sool Won has apparently been removed at least twice, the most recent version removed by you. May I have a copy of the removed content? I'd like to avoid the mistakes made by previous editors and eventually publish a new article that meets Wikipedia's standards. Thank you. -- Jeff Mitchell 17:00, 24 October 2018 (UTC) Visumancer (talk)

• Text emailed. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 12:38, 26 October 2018 (UTC)

Respicardia draft page

Hi - I'm somewhat new to Wikipedia, but I believe from the logs that you removed a draft of the Respicardia page that I had submitted. I was hoping to follow up with you on why the article was removed, and how it can be changed so that it is accepted. I realize there are some inherent risks in creating a page about a company, but I tried to do it in the style of other MedTech companies that have published Wikipedia pages. I intended to submit some additional questions/comments yesterday, but I am not sure they were received. Could we open up a dialog on how to adjust the article? Thank you for your consideration, SeamusSjackso3 (talk) 18:34, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

• Best place for a dialogue is DRV. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 12:38, 26 October 2018 (UTC)

Horror

Hi. You recently deleted the draft:List of American Horror Story: Apocalypse characters article on the grounds of WP:R3, saying Recently created, implausible redirect. So just to check there isn't any misunderstanding, List of American Horror Story: Apocalypse characters was in the draftspace until yesterday, having been created on September 20, 2018. Then the draft ended up being deleted and recreated as a redirect as part of a round-robin swap with Draft:Move/Draft:List of American Horror Story: Apocalypse characters. So there should be a redirect at Draft:List of American Horror Story: Apocalypse characters to List of American Horror Story: Apocalypse characters per WP:RDRAFT from my understanding (writing this though, I'm wondering if the article at Draft:List of American Horror Story: Apocalypse characters actually redirected to American Horror Story: Apocalypse before you deleted it). Anyway, could I check if there should be a redirect from the draftspace to the mainspace? Thank you TedEdwards 11:54, 25 October 2018 (UTC)

• In the case of a straightforward move of an approved draft to mainspace, the feeling is that the redirect in draft space should be left. But in a messy case like this if there is no redirect, it just does not matter. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 12:38, 26 October 2018 (UTC)

WorldEsportsDay

Why did you speedily delete article - World Esports Day 24th November? The article was wrote to educate others on the rise of esports, a subject you might be unfamiliar with as it is a relatively new format of sporting media in the last few years. Being competitive video games in it's simplest of forms, it is misunderstood and has a stigma attached to it, a prejudice! Either regarding it as not a true form of sport or a form of make believe sporting skill only millennials would conceive. But none the less it is a sporting vocation for many, and a spectating sport enjoyed by the masses celebrated on the 24th November.

You self proclaimed grumpy old man, please find attached links to sporting events hosted world wide and appreciated by many so you can educate yourself on up to date... League of Legends Esports "League of Legends Esports". LoL Esports. Retrieved 25 October 2018. Overwatch Esports "Overwatch Esports". Esports - Overwatch. Retrieved 25 October 2018. — EsportsNews (talk) 14:17, 25 October 2018 (UTC)

• Kindly have the decency to wait until someone with ne CoI thinks the event is notable and writes about it here. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 12:38, 26 October 2018 (UTC)

Secure Reliable Transport

Good day, I'm looking to get access to the following deleted page: Secure Reliable Transport Please let me know what I can do. Best, Jones wiv (talk) 14:29, 25 October 2018 (UTC)

(talk page watcher) @Jones wiv: Welcome. I see that page was deleted under speedy deletion criterion G12. This means that it was deemed an unambiguous copyright infringement. Wikipedia does not host copyrighted materials, I'm afraid, so the page cannot be restored. However, since the article copied wholly from this website, the easiest way of seeing what was in the article would be to go there. If, of course, you have access to independent, reliable sources that provide a in-depth and WP:PERSISTENT coverage of the company, then you are welcome—indeed, encouraged—to re-write the article in your own words. Hope this clarifies things! ——SerialNumber54129 14:38, 25 October 2018 (UTC)

• Text emailed. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 12:38, 26 October 2018 (UTC)

Grand Theft Auto V

Hi RHaworth, just wondering why you deleted File:Grand Theft Auto V combat.jpg and File:Grand Theft Auto V Los Santos.jpg? There is an ongoing discussion on the image talk page, and I strongly believe that both images had valid fair use rationales and thus did not violate WP:F7. – Rhain ☔ 10:36, 26 October 2018 (UTC)

• Restored. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 12:38, 26 October 2018 (UTC)

SLO City News (deleted)

Hi, I am new to editing wiki and noticed the page was to be deleted because of the copyrights. I am aware and thought I could use direct sources as long as the source was added but now that I know I understand. The page was only in draft mode and therefore, I wish the note was only left without the entire page being deleted. Can you undeleted it so I can properly update the sources please thank you! Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Iantheism (talk • contribs)

• Copyvios are deletable wherever they appear here. Text emailed. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 12:25, 27 October 2018 (UTC)

Operation Gold Fish

Hello Mr.R Haworth, This is the request for reason behind deleting the page Operation Gold Fish. This is a movie name in Telugu language in the country India. We added references of articles in national news papers. Please help in taking the Wikipedia page live. Thank you, Regards Manoj Valluri — Preceding unsigned comment added by Manojvalluri (talk • contribs)

• The page has never been deleted. Incidentally, why did you chose to come to me? Your answer may give a clue to what you actually want. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 12:25, 27 October 2018 (UTC)

• I guess the user Manojvalluri means to ask why was the page redirected, right? — Csgir (talk) 12:39, 27 October 2018 (UTC)

• Probably. But in that case Manojvalluri, why are you asking me rather than the user who did the redirection? — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 13:26, 27 October 2018 (UTC)

Flying up yer nose

About: deleted daftspace article Draft:Gasterophilus Nasalis. Yep, it's me again, your intermittent (in the metaphorical sense) Gadfly . In this case it's a botfly. "Gasterophilus Nasalis" - which should of course be Gasterophilus nasalis, with the specific epithet uncapitalised - is a real critter. I guess I could start the article myself, but to my mind that would not be the right thing to do. — Pete AU aka -- Shirt58 (talk) 09:57, 28 October 2018 (UTC)

• Has been restored to draft:Gasterophilus nasalis - go ahead: turn it into an article and submit it. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 01:01, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

Block for User:MisseagleZA

I have encountered again the same person who created Draft:Miss Eagle South Africa. They have recreated the draft in User:MisseagleZA/sandbox. Have created an SPI case for User:Thembih at WP:SPI/Thembih, as I suspect this will only continue. — Dreamy Jazz 🎷 ^{talk to me | my contributions} 11:17, 28 October 2018 (UTC)

• WP:SPI is a valid shortcut link but WP:SPI/Thembih don't work - need to spell it out as Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Thembih. I would have blocked them without an SPI. They are now blocked so things are OK. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 01:01, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

Deleted Page - Myers Jackson

I have been in work with this project for sometime (first wiki updating) and recent received a completed update file. I would like to submit this update to the page for submission. Please assist Source page: Texas Flip N Move deleted, and in work article: pointless link. Above action taken 18:51, 21 May 2018 RHaworth (talk | contribs) deleted page Draft:Myers Jackson (abandoned draft (TW)). — Ralph.pugh (talk) 16:06, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

• Learn to provide wiilinks. Restored. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 01:18, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

deleted page

Hi I was wondering why you deleted the most recent draft of The Hustle. If you could please provide detail regarding the issue I would appreciate it so that I can edit the draft to reflect Wikipedia's standards. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kyle Ellis SF (talk • contribs)

• Please read this. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 01:18, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Campbell Grant

Hi. You deleted this page just hours after I was warned this might happen. I'm not on Wikipedia all day monitoring my talk page. No reason to be so anxious to delete things. Thanks. Thmazing (talk) 22:46, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

Request

Are you able to resurrect the article Two-letter English words and put it in my draft space? — Barbara ✐✉ 18:57, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

• What would would you do with it if I restored it? What is wrong with ths list of English two-letter words? — RHaworth (talk · contribs)

Deleted Page - sgCarMart

I'm writing to ask about a business page that has been deleted. sgCarMart is under the SPH group and we would like to have it reinstated. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Razorzedge (talk • contribs) 01:23, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

• The best I can offer is that you follow this advice. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 01:18, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

Page un-create-protection

Hello. I'm a reviewer at AfC and I stumbled across this draft. While I think some language in it is potentially problematic I think it stands a good chance at AfD and I was about to move it to mainspace when I noticed that the article is create-protected. If you agree with my assessment then I'd like for the protection to be removed. Thanks a lot! ProgrammingGeek ^talktome 15:13, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

• Deleted five times! But you can have an AfD if you want one, — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 22:14, 3 November 2018 (UTC)

Deletion request

Hello! I was wondering if you could help with this one All-American Girl (TV series). The reasoning is explained in the speedy deletion proposal as the article for 2003 TV series no longer exists (was recently deleted), so All-American Girl (1994 TV series) remains the only TV series with that name. All-American Girl (TV series) being an undeleted article prevents a valid move. Thanks!Jovanmilic97 (talk) 21:55, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

• Actioned. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 22:14, 3 November 2018 (UTC)

Talkback

You seem to have missed my ping, or it's decided to stop working at SPI again. Either way, could I trouble you for a response at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kashmirwindow. Thanks in advance. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:07, 3 November 2018 (UTC)

• Sorry, yes, I was pinged and missed it. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 22:14, 3 November 2018 (UTC)

Undeletion

You deleted a page needed for copyright attribution - see here. If you see this before someone else restored it, please restore it. — 2001:A61:492:BC00:2507:E75C:1C33:57AA (talk) 22:46, 3 November 2018 (UTC)

This has been done(see here). — 2001:A61:443:7700:DC8E:BA33:3A3B:A29A (talk) 00:34, 6 November 2018 (UTC)

• Good. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 14:44, 6 November 2018 (UTC)

Another request

Hello again! So there is again a similar situation like with my All-American Girl thing. Seyed Mohammad Hosseini was a disambiguation which wrongly showed two people which had Mohammad Hosseini name shared and is covered by Mohammad Hosseini (disambiguation). So now there is only one person left Seyed Mohammad Hosseini (showman) but the redirect is blocking the move. Also there is Seyed Mohammad Hosseini (disambiguation) which is unneccesary and should be deleted and it just shows to Seyed Mohammad Hosseini. Thanks! Jovanmilic97 (talk) 17:18, 4 November 2018 (UTC)

• Seyed Mohammad Hosseini (disambiguation) deleted. Re Seyed Mohammad Hosseini: please discuss on the talk page instead of nominating for speedy deletion. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 14:44, 6 November 2018 (UTC)

salting request

Hi. I hope you are well. Would you please salt Priya Prakash Varrier (Actress)? Also, would you please U1 delete User:Usernamekiran/test, and User:Usernamekiran/test 2? Regards, —usernamekiran(talk) 20:48, 4 November 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for the deletion, and moving as well. See you around :) —usernamekiran(talk) 10:19, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

Ed Aulerich-Sugai

Hi Roger, Draft page deleted for Draft:Ed Aulerich-Sugai --> Followup on copyright permissions. You deleted the first version of an Ed Aulerich-Sugai on October 16, 2018. The deletion notice directed me to follow up with you before creating a new Wikipedia page for Aulerich-Sugai. The reason you deleted the page was copyright infringement of a text on another webpage (https://www.edaulerich-sugai.com/the-artist) that I also wrote, and which I adapted for the Wikipedia page. I'm now following the Wikipedia guidelines to release copyright on my text. My hope is to create a Wiki page for this artist that others can add to and adapt. Before I create a new draft page for Aulerich-Sugai, is there anything else you'd recommend I do to help guarantee the page passes the initial review?

Many thanks, allaefimova — Preceding unsigned comment added by Allaefimova (talk • contribs) 20:22, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

• 68 Google hits is not very promising. But feel free to try again via draft space. Learn to add {{reflist}} at the appropriate point and how to format external links. If anything, your draft had too many external links - cut down to ones that prove his notability. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 14:44, 6 November 2018 (UTC)

Template:Divstylesiaaa

Please delete this redirect as G8, thanksHhkohh (talk) 09:41, 6 November 2018 (UTC)

• Done. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 14:44, 6 November 2018 (UTC)

Deletion review for DevSecops

An editor has asked for a deletion review of DevSecops. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. — Kermit2 (talk) 15:46, 6 November 2018 (UTC)

• DevSecops has never existed. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 14:07, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

deleted 5st regime change?

Greetings, Roger, Please explain why my 5st regime change page was deleted from the B.G. Knocc Out discography? Minus the wiki formatting, this is what I put up. I feel like listing the songs on an album is good wiki information. I think perhaps one or more of the links were the source of your objection? Please share your wisdom and knowledge with me? — MsKathyFellows (talk) 16:20, 6 November 2018 (UTC)

• Learn to provide proper wikilinks when when you talk about a page. Do not clutter this page with non-talk stuff. Your page was deleted because it was not even an attempt at the start of an article: it was just a few working notes. 5st. Regime Change restored and moved to draft:5st. Regime Change. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 14:07, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

Deleted Page Ashlee.k

Hello Roger, First of all thanks that you keep Wikipedia clean and useful. I am a music producer based in Germany and I have actually created a page about one year ago and you have deleted it. That was my mistake. I thought I could first create a page and then improve my career, I didn't know it doesn't work that way. :)

So but now it's different, it's improved now, I released many songs I won a award in USA as the best electronic Song 2018, there are many articles about me and I've got verification from Google you can check it here: https://g.co/kgs/FtE9d1 I wanted to ask how can I have the page back? The name is : Ashlee.k. My Best Regards, Ashlee.k (talk) 11:14, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

• I will say one thing in your favour: you have not used that horrible, empty phrase "award winning". But kindly have the decency to go on waiting until someone with no CoI thinks you are notable and writes about you here. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 14:07, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

Sorry if you mind it

Hi admin, Sami Khan was moved to Sami Khan (disambiguation) by me, then i tagged Sami Khan for g6. Actually Sami Khan (general) is not that much famous and relevant to be dabbed with Sami Khan (actor). Just like Imran Khan and Imran Khan (disambiguation). In other words, I want to move Sami Khan (actor) to Sami Khan for a valid reason. Will you do something. — Ulfat Khann (talk) 13:31, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

• Something done. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 14:07, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

Thank You so much. — Ulfat Khann (talk) 14:12, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

Morris Ganis

Firstly, thank you for deleting Portal:Morris Ganis.
I moved another of their odd page moves - Wikipedia:Morris Ganis - to User talk:Morris Ganis. Unfortunately, it should have been moved to User talk:Morrisganis, but I failed to spot that the user had renamed it as well as moving it.
The software will not let me to move User talk:Morris Ganis to User talk:Morrisganis - so could I please ask you to do that - Thanks - Arjayay (talk) 12:47, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

• Actioned. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:31, 9 November 2018 (UTC)

you deleted my sandbox...

I don't remember why it was redirected somewhere or where it was redirected to, but I imagine it had a history, unless I'm misremembering. If it was just a redirect after page move, then meh; otherwise, this is not ideal. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 02:58, 9 November 2018 (UTC)

• User:Rhododendrites/sandbox and User:BrandonXLF/Whatlinkshere were both redirects to themselves. Dw122339 applied speedy tags to both with misleading edit summaries.

Dw122339, since they were in user space, these were totally harmless pages. Please find something more useful to do than touching such pages. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:31, 9 November 2018 (UTC)

Camille Louiseau Chadal

Please restore Camille Louiseau Chadal. "Misspelling" is not a valid CSD criterion. -- Tavix ^(talk) 14:50, 9 November 2018 (UTC)

• Noted. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:31, 9 November 2018 (UTC)

Ethics of animal research article deletion

The article I curated was deleted on the 24th of october in response to @Jytdog that I was a student editor and that the content I provided was out of dialogue with an existing sub topic of the article Animal Testing. I am asking that this page be undeleted on the premises that the conditions it was deleted were inaccurate. It was deleted under section A10 (for the criteria of a speedy deletion): "This applies to any recently created article with no relevant page history that duplicates an existing English Wikipedia topic, and that does not expand upon, detail or improve information within any existing article(s) on the subject, and where the title is not a plausible redirect." I believe that the article I submitted greatly expanded on the philosophical debates surrounding the ethics of animal testing. I went into sufficient detail only from the philosophical side with plenty of references to show that this is a stem of ethics within the philosophical community. When the article was deleted under A10 I was redirected to "Animal Testing #ethics" [no link - spurious capials and lack of capital] which only offers a few sentences on the viewpoints of a few philosophers (and only ones against animal testing) and the rest about different types of experimentation and animals that were used that sparked protest- a different angle to the one that i provided; which focused purely on going into depth on the philosophical moral arguments. I believe at minimum that the content I provided would have fit under content to be merged: "This does not include split pages or any article that expands or reorganizes an existing one or that contains referenced, merge able material. It also does not include disambiguation pages. Thank you --ExistentialMariachi (talk) 19:26, 09 November 2024 (UTC)

• Try not to be so long winded. All your edits to ethics of animal research have now been restored. Wikipedia is a collaborative project; not a place to publish essays. I suggest you proceed by improving the animal testing#Ethics section. Certainly that article is rather long so you could propose a split on its talk page. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 09:34, 11 November 2018 (UTC)

There is a miscommunication. The page is still a redirect. For the record the "philosophy layout guidelines" were followed for the structure of the page. The article was selected to write based on its red text status from wiki projects" (philosophy). Animal testing and pages surrounding the topic were researched on Wikipedia before commencement of the project. The draft was listed for a time before being published in the main space. Upon publishing into the main space reviewers were invited to engage and assist in editing the article but instead It was speedy deleted. I will requesta review as a precaution to ensure all avenues are explored for the sake of information sharing

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Ethics of animal research. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. ExistentialMariachi (talk) 19:26, 09 November 2024 (UTC)

• What is your objection to discussing the matter at talk:animal testing? Have you considered launching the article via AfC? Please reply to both questions. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 11:45, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

"No promote"

Hi i would like to use wikipedia for my company. it no promote or adsvestise. just information for people who what i'm i Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sarawutskuberg (talk • contribs) 15:59, 10 November 2018 (UTC)

• Wikipedia is not a trade directory. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 09:34, 11 November 2018 (UTC)

OK Sir, Can I write History of my Company no promote no adv no link to my website. just Encyclopedia to website thankyou. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sarawutskuberg (talk • contribs)

• No. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 11:45, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for reply, How i can use wikipedia the free encyclopedia with my knowledge THankyou — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sarawutskuberg (talk • contribs) 05:06, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

• If by "use" you mean use Wikipedia to promote your company, the answer is still: do not do it. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 10:49, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

• Four times you have a left a message at the top of this page. Three times I have moved the message down here. Since you have not got the message, I have blanked your latest but if you repeat it down here, I will reply. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 10:25, 15 November 2018 (UTC)

Curiosity

Hello, I just find out that you're the one who deleted the article I was writing and I want to know the reason why you did so. Because you do not have any knowledge about the article I was writing, why did you allow yourself to do so? If possible, am requesting the content of the page I have already wrote. Thsnks for your understanding. Brainrod (talk) 16:56, 11 November 2018 (UTC)

• Please read this and this. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 11:45, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

Theatrical Costume Construction

Hello Mr. Haworth. I am attempting to recover or get a copy of my recently deleted article Theatrical Costume Construction. I need it for two reasons, 1) to provide it to my instructor for a class and 2) to hopefully use as a reference to re-write the article for hopeful later submission after learning more about the Wikipedia process and requirements. As you can see, I am very new to this process. Thank you! Iris Harmon - Dolphin7861 Dolphin7861 (talk) 00:30, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

• I should really dismiss you by telling you to read this but I have taken pity and restored all your deleted edits apart from two redirects. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 11:45, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

You deleted the draft page for Nazrin Hassan

Hi Mr. Haworth. This is my first time "talking" on this site. I was writing my first article on Wiki and with all due respect, you marked the new article for Nazrin Hassan for speedy deletion. It was my first official Wikipedia article. Well, I'm not sure how Wiki works but I thought a DRAFT is a way for me to save an article BEFORE it gets published (cos I don't see any other way or button to save a page). Do note that the article was a work in progress, the text and sentences shall be changed later on once I got all the details (from sources) in it. I also read the five pillars on Wiki which state that and I quote "Be bold but not reckless in updating articles. And do not agonize over making mistakes: ". If so, am I being punished for conforming to the pillars? As I said, I assumed a draft is just a draft (a work in progress) and not a final document. So, could you please reinstate the article so that I could finish it and rectify whatever issues it has. Thank you Mwhc00 (talk) 02:23, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

• Please read this. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 11:45, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

About this page

This page National Management Programme supplements the official NMP page hosted by the Management Development Institute. It provides information on life in the NMP programme. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nigamniyati (talk • contribs)

• Noted. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 11:45, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

Spambox deleted

User:Magoo87bit/sandbox
Hi there, I am writing with reference to the above mentioned deleted page on BrikBit Digital Shares. I would like to create a page that describes the main features of my startup and does not want to promote anything in particular. How can I create a complete description of the company without it being deleted? I would really appreciate your suggestions. Thank you very much Best, Magoo87bit — Preceding unsigned comment added by Magoo87bit (talk • contribs) 14:33, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

• Suggestion: give up and go away. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 10:49, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

Reopen the page of ZW3D

Dear Roger, May I know why our product page ZW3D was deleted? Could you please send me the orignial text from our page? I am the new marketing head of ZW3D team and would like to if it's possible for us to create the page of ZW3D and make sure that all of the description comply with all the rules of Wikipedia. Thanks~ Best Regards, Michelle — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zw3dmkt (talk • contribs) 05:41, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

• Please read this. Text emailed but please do not attempt to re-post it here. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 10:49, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

Kount redirect

Can you make a redirect from "Kount" to Clazz? These are intentional misspellings in computer programming, to avoid conflict with a reserved word. -- Vladimir Alexiev (talk) 11:13, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

• I suppose there are some SQL users who have not learned about the ` key but if you want a redirect from kount, you may have it . You may also have klazz but we will do that indirectly. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 11:46, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

Responsibility

Hello
I apologise in advance for any errors I make - I am very new to editing wikipedia and am not fully au fait with the systems for eg contacting other users. If I mess up, please be kind enough to tell me what I ought to have done instead.
I work on a research project that looks at Responsible Research and Innovation. I see from wikipedia that there was a page but you removed it. I would very much like to understand why, and create a better page, as this is a reputable research discipline, and I wondered if you would be kind enough to let me have the text of the page? — Octaviapink (talk) 11:38, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

• Learn wikilinks. Restored. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 10:25, 15 November 2018 (UTC)

Much appreciated - I have posted my comments on the Talk page for the article and will give it a rewrite. My understanding is that wikilinks are bad for wikipedia, is that correct? — Octaviapink (talk) 09:53, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

• Wikilinks are bad!!! For goodness sake, learn a few wiki standards. This is a wikilink: Responsible Research and Innovation. Compare that with the link you used in the original state of your message. Which link do you think is "bad"? You also omitted to provide an heading to your message. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 11:06, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

Please clarify or return Markforged page

Good Day, You deleted my page Markforged under the auspices of "G11," which it was tagged with yesterday. As I wrote in my comment on the talk page for that article, this tag simply seems inapplicable—the content of the article, whatever you may say about it, does not fall under G11. To wit: "Any article that describes its subject from a neutral point of view does not qualify for this criterion." It is certainly hard to make hard-and-fast objective assertions about style and tone, etc., but I believe any reasonable observer, and certainly anyone who has any experience on Wikipedia, would not have considered the tone of the article inappropriate or promotional in any way. And it makes me wonder whether you or the individual who tagged it yesterday even read it? I also see that you have locked out the page under the dubious claim that it has been "repeatedly recreated." As far as I am aware this page was created years ago, once, by some unknown party possibly not connected to the company. I can't speak to this literal one previous version, but I am confident we created an article of reasonable and sufficient quality for inclusion here, and it is unfair to imply, as you seem to have done, that this is being repeatedly created in some abusive fashion. And it is certainly incorrect to say that there is "no indication of importance." It is true that the initial version of the page did not perhaps highlight the areas in which Markforged is a unique a newsworthy company (inventing continuous carbon fiber printing, certain metal printing processes, etc.), but these things would have been added, hopefully by the community, etc., once this sword of Damocles of capricious editorial deletion had been, ideally, cleared away, and at any rate the company's market position, investors, etc. would justify inclusion regardless of its technological distinctions.

To be frank, and with all due respect, it is my considered opinion you and the other editors involved in these decisions are abusing your positions with capricious and indefensible actions that fly in the face of both the spirit and the letter of Wikipedia editorial standards, and I would ask that you carefully review this page and reconsider your position as soon as possible. Thank you. Reverendgraham (talk) 19:59, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

• An inordinate amount of waffle but no link to the page in question. Restored. Kindly have the decency to wait until someone who has not been paid to write the article thinks the company is notable and approves the article for mainspace. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 10:25, 15 November 2018 (UTC)

CC

Hello RHaworth, Picture deleted has creative common license allowing reproduction in any medium. Many thanks for your incredible service to the Wiki community the past decade, incredible! I am new to this so writing for some guidance about two pictures that you deleted citing (F9: Media file copyright violation without credible claim of fair use or permission).

This is the page where I had added the pictures because they were much more relevant to the article (pictures taken at the IMF where this person has been appointed, and with the IMF MD who appointed her): Gita Gopinath. Here are the two new pictures that I had added that you deleted: File:Gita Gopinath with IMF Managing Director Christine Lagarde at 2017 IMF Annual Meeting in Washington DC.jpg and File:Gita Gopinath at the 2017 IMF Annual Meeting in Washington DC.jpg.

I had taken both pictures from the Flickr account of the IMF where both pictures are listed with a creative commons license that allows their use. The license says "You are free to: Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms." A copy of the license says NC-ND. And the two pictures (with links to this license) are from Flickr and can be found here and here.

I thought the above license clearly allows for this picture to be redistributed in any medium or format and had also noted these copyrights in the relevant section when I uploaded these pictures. If this license does allow for these pictures, then can you please restore. If not, then can you please let me know why they attract F9-Copyright violation from Wikipedia so I don't make that mistake again. Many thanks again for your service, sumfal Sumfal (talk) 22:35, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

• Please learn wikilinks for wiki articles, that naked URLs for other links are obscene, that re-instating an image description page as a message is little better than vandalism and that brevity is the soul of wit. You included the reason in your message: NC-ND. The Wikimedia sites require BY-SA or less restrictive and I cannot see any justification for uploading the images as fair use. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 10:25, 15 November 2018 (UTC)

Copyright problem fixed for draft

Hi, i fixed the copyright problems you marked for the page: https://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Draft:Valentina_Lombardo Can you check if now can be ok? thanks (G3n10z (talk) 10:57, 15 November 2018 (UTC))

Draft:List of programs broadcast by Rengoni

Thanks for cleaning up my mess. I wasn't quite sure how to proceed with the articles already having a draft in draftspace. Actually I'm not quite sure what to do with মৃগাংক they keep creating articles with no references. And any attempts notify them as to what they are doing wrong quickly gets deleted off their talk page. --Whispering^(t) 17:44, 15 November 2018 (UTC)

Held & Hines Draft Text Request

Hi RHaworth, You recently deleted my draft page: https://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Draft:Held_%26_Hines I was not too clear on how citing worked, and what counted as verifiable sources. This was also my first time editing a Wikipedia page, and I will continue to read the rules/guidelines so that I could provide acceptable content. May I have the original text so that I can continue to edit? Thank you! ( Evelyn.yz.mau (talk) 17:51, 15 November 2018 (UTC) )

Deleted Page-Lawren Brianna Ware

Hello!

You recently deleted the page I had been working on for Lawren Brianna Ware due to "unambiguous advertising or promotion." I feel that is incorrectly done as I did make sure to follow Wikipedia guidelines, and based the page off those of similar composers like Kate Soper (composer) and Jennifer Higdon. Wikipedia states to attempt to resolve with the deleting administrator before anything else. I hold no connection to the composer, it was purely for an assignment.

If you still feel it should stay deleted, could I please have access to the deleted page for Lawren Brianna Ware? Thank you. Jonlukemartin (talk) 18:13, 15 November 2018 (UTC)

B. J. Snowden

Did you bother to compare the article (B. J. Snowden) that was AfDed and the one I wrote? They bear little resemblance to each other. For one thing, I added a number of reliable sources from mainstream newspapers. For another thing, the deletion rationale at the AfD wasn't valid, as the subject clearly satisfied the GNG (significant coverage in multiple, reliable sources). I openly requested userfication of this at WP:REFUND. Your A7 is improper, as the article makes claims of notability (featured on the BBC, appearances on two major evening TV talk shows, a full chapter dedicated to her in Irwin Chusid's book: pretty much the basis for notability of outsider musicians in general). Please restore the article. EnPassant (talk) 18:22, 15 November 2018 (UTC)

Yangfeng Automotive

Hello, if I see well, 8 minutes after marking the article "YFAI" for deletion you deleted it. That was a pretty speedy deletion without chance to contest it. Now I see you hopefully could provide me with the deleted material so I will be able to think about a more compliant article in the future. The reference is https://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Special:Log?type=delete&page=YFAI Thank you in advance.

And one more question to you as an experienced and long-term editor: As I fully understand the general criteria about notability, I did not think that a company employing 30+ thousands people in many countries in three continents, delivering to all major automotive producers and giving pace in its branche should/could be not "notable." ? Do you think, the entry "YFAI" could be suitable for the Wiktionary? I wrote that article also having in mind that people could find what is behind these four leters, besides the above mentioned facts. Regards, ChJn (talk) 22:30, 15 November 2018 (UTC)

don't delete upcoming articles

plz don't delete the mope.io page it's getting created. mope.io — Preceding unsigned comment added by ShirleyLucks (talk • contribs) 00:39, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

Hello Dear, Can you please tell me my mistakes ? — KH Fajla Rabby (talk) 03:18, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

• Wikipedia is not a social networking site. Please stick to FaceBook, etc. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 11:06, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

A cupcake for you!

Hello dear, can you please tell me my mistakes? — KH Fajla Rabby (talk) 03:12, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

A cheeseburger for you!

Hello Dear can you please tell me my mistakes? — KH Fajla Rabby (talk) 03:14, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

Free Republic of Liberland

Excuse me please. May I be knowing precisely why eight days ago Free Republic of Liberland was deleted by you, and why it stands now? Why could the details I pasted onto the article not just be blanked and redirected? --Ishmailer (talk) 09:39, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

• See User talk:Thomas.W#Paucity. - Tom | Thomas.W ^talk 10:37, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

Greighwolfe

Hello. I saw that the draft I made for creating a biography article has been deleted. Saw the references that you've added, but I'm not sure of the steps that I took wrong. If you have a minute can you guide me more easily through the process of publishing my first article here? Draft:Greighwolfe Thank you in advance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Doychinborisov (talk • contribs) 11:09, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

Edit summaries

re. your edit summary here - probably not a good idea to use that as an abbreviation for "removing"... you may want to pop it in Wikipedia's Search bar and see what comes up (not if you're at work, though). Yunshui ^雲_水 10:49, 16 November 2018 (UTC)