Talk:Bud Light boycott
Latest comment: 1 month ago by 2001:8003:8409:8D00:392B:FD76:46FD:11B3 in topic This is opinion and needs to be removed
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bud Light boycott article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 2 months  |
 | The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
| This article should adhere to the gender identity guideline because it contains material about one or more trans women. Precedence should be given to self-designation as reported in the most up-to-date reliable sources, anywhere in article space, even when it doesn't match what's most common in reliable sources. Any person whose gender might be questioned should be referred to by the pronouns, possessive adjectives, and gendered nouns (for example "man/woman", "waiter/waitress", "chairman/chairwoman") that reflect that person's latest expressed gender self-identification. Some people go by singular they pronouns, which are acceptable for use in articles. This applies in references to any phase of that person's life, unless the subject has indicated a preference otherwise. Former, pre-transition names may only be included if the person was notable while using the name; outside of the main biographical article, such names should only appear once, in a footnote or parentheses.If material violating this guideline is repeatedly inserted, or if there are other related issues, please report the issue to the LGBTQ+ WikiProject, or, in the case of living people, to the BLP noticeboard. |
| The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
 | A fact from Bud Light boycott appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 14 June 2023 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | This article has previously been nominated to be moved. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination.
Discussions:
|
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Bruxton (talk) 02:20, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
( )
- ... that country singer Kid Rock filmed himself shooting several cases of Bud Light with an assault rifle after the brand did a partnership with Dylan Mulvaney? Source: https://variety.com/2023/music/news/bud-light-dylan-mulvaney-conservative-artists-1235575691/
- ALT1: ... that after Kid Rock filmed himself shooting cases of Bud Light in response to a collaboration the brand did with trans woman Dylan Mulvaney, a photo surfaced of him chugging a bottle of Bud Light with a drag queen? Source: https://www.newsweek.com/kid-rock-mocked-photo-drinking-bud-light-drag-queen-1793067
- ALT2: ... that in response to a collaboration Bud Light did with trans woman Dylan Mulvaney, people filmed themselves driving over Bud Light bottles? Source: https://www.businessinsider.com/right-wingers-destroying-budweiser-beer-dylan-mulvaney-lgbtq-marketing-2023-4
- ALT3: ... that after a boycott of beer-conglomerate Anheuser-Busch over a partnership done with their Bud Light brand and Dylan Mulvaney, beer salesmen complained of not being able to feed their families? Source: https://www.newsweek.com/fact-check-anheuser-busch-ceo-resign-bud-light-fallout-1793729
- ALT4: ... that after trans woman Dylan Mulvaney was sponsored by Bud Light, American conservatives boycotted the brand and its parent company of Anheuser-Busch? Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/danidiplacido/2023/04/11/why-does-the-bud-light-backlash-feel-so-desperate/?sh=447818994433
- Reviewed:
Created by Knightoftheswords281 (talk). Self-nominated at 16:15, 12 April 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/2023 Anheuser-Busch boycott; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
- Passerby comment (this is not a review, others should still feel free to grab this as a review). Given that there's plenty of sources on this topic and that it's pretty controversial, I'd suggest removing Newsweek as a reference from the article and from any proposed hooks without a truly powerful justification for why any specific Newsweek story is reliable. See WP:NEWSWEEK, that publication has gone downhill since 2013 or so and just makes stuff up these days, and is considered a suspicious-if-not-entirely-deprecated source. While here, I'd check the sources against WP:RSP in general - WP:FORBESCON suggests that using the hook referenced to a Forbes contributor is also not great and should be replaced if possible, unless there's an independent case to be made that the specific author is reliable. SnowFire (talk) 03:28, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
an active merge discussion and three maintenance tags are all disqualifying – it'll need to come off before a review. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 16:52, 15 April 2023 (UTC)- Any updates? Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 13:19, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
- Comment - all tags on article have been removed @theleekycauldron. - Knightoftheswords281 (Talk · Contribs) 20:26, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
ready for a re-review, then :) theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 22:39, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
- Note We need to avoid redirects from the Main Page as per WP:MPNOREDIRECT. [[Bud Light]] is a redirect and that needs fixing before this gets promoted (eventually). Schwede66 04:28, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
New enough, long enough. No neutrality problems found, no copyright problems found, no maintenance templates found. QPQ unnecessary. ALT0 is the only usable hook, as Newsweek, Forbes and BusinessInsider are all yellow on WP:RSP, ALT1 is additionally too long, and ALT1 and ALT3 are not in the article. Otherwise good to go.--Launchballer 08:02, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
- I feel like ALT0 gives attention to Kid Rock and also misidentifies the weapon he used. The press also often confuses assault weapons (which are aggressive looking military style semi-automatics) and machine guns. KR used an actual machine gun which has an auto sear. I confirmed that ALT4 is cited and in the article and I have removed the Bud Light redirect as @Schwede66: has suggested. The Newsweek reference about the boycott is not the only one in the article supporting the ALT4 hook - I checked. It seems the most accurate and sober choice. Bruxton (talk) 02:19, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
This is opinion and needs to be removed
editThe Bud Light boycott is an example of cancel culture and consumer backlash with real world consequences. It is a cautionary tale for publicists, at least. 2001:8003:8409:8D00:392B:FD76:46FD:11B3 (talk) 06:39, 13 October 2024 (UTC)