Wikipedia:Good article mentorship
| Main | Criteria | Instructions | Nominations | Backlog drives | Mentorship | Review circles | Discussion | Reassessment | Report |
Good article mentors provide assistance and feedback to editors who are new to reviewing. If you are interested in reviewing but are not sure where to start, requesting a mentor can make the process easier. To request a mentor, press the button below and follow the instructions.
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Mentors can:
- Help find an article suitable for a new reviewer to review
- Explain any of the good article criteria and how to assess them
- Check a review to make sure it was done correctly
- Answer any other questions about how to review a good article nomination
Mentors are not expected to complete any part of the review. Mentorship is optional, and you do not have to request a mentor to begin reviewing.
Mentors ()
|
|---|
|
This is a list of users who have volunteered to be good article mentors. If you wish to choose a specific mentor, you can leave a message on one of their talk pages. Remember that not all of them might be active or be able to help at any given time. If you're an experienced reviewer, you can add your name! You do not need to be on this list to answer a request for mentorship. Mentors are encouraged to add the mentorship page to their watchlist.
|
Current requests
editSangsangaplaz (Talk to me! I'm willing to help) 03:29, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
I wish to request a reviewer who has experience in reviewing World History articles. Specifically for the page Mizo Chieftainship.