Welcome!

Hello, Wykx, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Mjroots (talk) 15:26, 14 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

April 2010

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edits to General Mariano Escobedo International Airport and Aerounion – Aerotransporte de Carga Union removed content from Wikipedia. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Mjroots (talk) 15:26, 14 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Re your recent edits to the articles mentioned above, per WP:CITE, where did you get that info from? Mjroots (talk) 17:56, 14 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Earth Quack Data is Official

edit

official link of Earthquack. Why you removed. http://www.emsc-csem.org/Earthquake/earthquake.php?id=466583. Dont you think it harassment??

if earth quack is recorded why you not allow me to increase numbers??

The page data are based on USGS data, not on EMSC, you can ass EMSC data on the quake page 2015_Afghanistan_earthquake. Thanks

That is okay. but Why you removed total number of earthquak.

14 is already including the 2015_Afghanistan_earthquake so that's why we don't increase to 15.

Okay Thanks. And I added USGC Ref Data. Now you okay?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arpin22 (talkcontribs) 12:09, 26 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Now i have added USGS.Gov Link for Reference. why do you removed?? is there any problem? you added "Not necessary to duplicate a reference already existing)". This is not reason to removed Reference link which is valid. Right. Now Stop this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arpin22 (talkcontribs) 07:09, 28 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

@Arpin22: Hello, first you can discuss issue on a particular page on the Talk page of the specific page so that anybody can see it: Talk:List of earthquakes in 2015. Secondly the link you have added is already on the page tight after "A magnitude 7.5 earthquake struck Afghanistan 45 km (28 mi) north of `Alaqahdari-ye Kiran wa Munjan village, Kuran wa Munjan district, Badakhshan province on October 26 at a depth of 212.5 km (132.0 mi)." which is the standard for this page. If you introduce new references elsewhere on the page this should be discussed and agreed on the specific Talk page, keeping in mind we should add it for all the earthquakes and not specifically for one earthquake and that we'll have to maintain duplicate sources updated all across the page. I hope this helps. Wykx (talk) 09:02, 28 October 2015 (UTC)Reply
@Wykx: Its like acceptable now. for valid reason. Thanks.

Tibet is not the same place as China

edit

Tibet is not the same place as China. Tibet was stolen by China in 1950. Re this edit, you are misrepresenting the source which clearly says "Tibet". 86.150.91.187 (talk) 16:14, 25 April 2015 (UTC)Reply


A barnstar for you!

edit
  The Editor's Barnstar
I show my respect for your work on List of ongoing conflicts. Bolter21 22:03, 15 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

List of ongoing armed conflicts

edit

Hi! Can I ask you how you obtained the 5,798 figure for the 2014 death toll in Ukraine? In the new report you cited I can only find the total for 2014-2015 (7,883), and the 2014 box still cites the December 2014 report saying 4,771 people had been killed so far. There's also a problem in your update of the 2013-14 chart: the number of countries compared must be the same for both years, whereas it seems you included 20 countries in the 2014 bar instead of 17 as in the 2013 bar, and just 15 countries in the area chart on the right. Anyway, thanks for your frequent updates! Nykterinos (talk) 20:15, 10 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

@Nykterinos: Actually I admit this edit could be reverted. For 2015, I took the August 2015 figure of 2058 then I added the 27 casualties of September obtaining then 2085. The rest I put it on 2014 but I don't really know how much of the revised figure is for 2014 knowing that 2014 represented 5/7 of the total. So for the time being I haven't found a source to breakdown the new total by year.
Concerning the graph, if your source file is easier to update than mine, could you update it once the Ukraine figure is agreed? In the meantime, I see no objection that you revert mine.Wykx (talk) 22:28, 10 October 2015 (UTC)Reply
I see. In my opinion, if the breakdown by year isn't provided by secondary sources, we should stick to the 2014 source for 2014 and put the rest in 2015, until a clearer breakdown is available. I can easily update the chart then. Nykterinos (talk) 23:06, 10 October 2015 (UTC)Reply
@Nykterinos:I have found this article which shows quite clearly that initial 2014 UN figures were underestimated. [1] Please take a look until the end of the article and tell me what do you think? Wykx (talk) 23:42, 10 October 2015 (UTC)Reply
You're probably right that the total provided now by the UN includes a death toll revised upwards for 2014, as you can read here: "The increases in the numbers of casualties between the different reporting dates do not necessarily mean that these casualties happened between these dates: they could have happened earlier, but were recorded by a certain reporting date." Unfortunately, however, the latest UN report doesn't distinguish between 2014 and 2015, so we can't determine how much its December 2014 figure has been revised upwards. Therefore, I would suggest not changing it unless UN sources themselves provide the breakdown by year. Using different sources from the UN is not a solution, since they are not so reliable and they can't be combined with UN sources. Nykterinos (talk) 00:14, 11 October 2015 (UTC)Reply
@Nykterinos: Thank you for the link to the full report. So I update 2014 back to previous figures and include all new reported casualties into 2015.Wykx (talk) 00:37, 11 October 2015 (UTC)Reply
Thanks. Hopefully, one of the next UN reports will clarify the revision of the 2014 death toll. Nykterinos (talk) 10:07, 11 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Explain yourself

edit

In our now long discussion over the starting point of the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict, you stated "I will not revert the date" as you are "open to more insights", it seems you did exactly what you said you would not do. Can you explain your doings? Not only your actions come in contrast with your statement, it is also rude as it ignores the fact we are having a discussion precisely on this matter. Moreover, this change doesn't make any sense as im detailing you for days now why 1949 is not the starting point of the conflict. Either you just don't read anything been said in the conversation (which makes you ineligible to edit) or you have some serious explanations to do. Until than i hope you will stick to your own words and withdrew from re-editing that section of the article. Mateo (talk) 05:21, 11 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

You're true. You were not answering anymore, but I should have been waiting for more time. Wykx 05:26, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

Maps

edit

Hi Wykx,

I noticed that you regularly update the maps for many of the presidential trips articles, like List of presidential trips made by François Hollande and List of presidential trips made by Barack Obama. I was wondering if you could also update the map for List of presidential trips made by Benigno Aquino III according to the number of trips President Aquino has already made which is below the map because it has always been outdated and I do not have full knowledge of how to work these maps.

Thanks! PatTag2659, a hopeful aviator (talk) 15:31, 1 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Dear PatTag2659, actually it quite easy to do it :
1/ download the software https://inkscape.org/en/
2/ save the .svg or .png file of the map from https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Narendra_Modi_foreign_trips.svg for example
3/ with Inkscape, open the .svg or .png file of the map
4/ select the country with your mouse
a/ change the color code in the infobox
or
b/ press F7 and select another country with the desired color, it will paste the color on the selected country
5/ save and then upload the new file by clicking on "Upload a new version of this file" on the file page (for example https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Narendra_Modi_foreign_trips.svg)
Don't hesitate if you have more questions or if something is not clear enough...
“Tell me and I forget, teach me and I may remember, involve me and I learn.” ― Benjamin Franklin Wykx 16:20, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
Hi Wykx, thank you so much for the instructions. However, I stumbled with step 4. How do you select a country and change its color code? Thanks! - PatTag2659, a hopeful aviator (talk) 12:52, 5 December 2015 (UTC)Reply
PatTag2659 On step 4, you click on the country. The country will be selected. Maybe you have to go to the menu Edition/XML Editor to display on the right the box were you can see the detail of the code. On the right you have a line called "style". Click on it, change the color code and click on 'Define'.
Alternatively, if you have already another country with the desired color, select the country you want to update, press F7, select the country which has already the desired color, it will paste the desired color on the country you want to update. Wykx 13:03, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
It's still not clear though how you click the country. After I uploaded the map, all I've been clicking was the map's image itself. PatTag2659, a hopeful aviator (talk) 14:16, 5 December 2015 (UTC)Reply
In order to save the image on a modifiable format that you can change, be sure to click 1/ on the pic on https://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/List_of_presidential_trips_made_by_Benigno_Aquino_III then on 2/ 'More details' on the bottom right then 3/ on the pic then 4/ Save as... Be sure that the image is in format .svg Wykx 16:43, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
edit
 
File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Ongoing conflicts around the world in 2014.svg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Steel1943 (talk) 23:39, 30 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Yemeni Civil War (2015)

edit

You moved the page to Yemeni Civil War (2015–present), but it isn't 2016 in Yemen. It is only 2016 in the eastern-most parts of the world. I won't argue over this, but perhaps look into this for similar moves in the future. Dustin (talk) 17:50, 31 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

True. And let's hope the conflict will finish in less than three hours ;) I was just preparing 2016 as I was quite sure the conflict would continue and the name 2015-present isn't false anyway. Wykx 17:54, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Wykx!

edit
Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Happy New Year 2016}} to send this message

Oh, lovely, thank you very much. I wish you a peaceful and enjoyable year too. Thanks for your contributions too. Wykx 19:13, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

The discussion is not over

edit

Please leave the tag until it is. Thanks, Dawnseeker2000 22:15, 3 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hi, no news since ten days. How long shall we wait? Regards.Wykx 22:17, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
My last message stated that I would bring it up again in the new year and I meant it. Today's the third day of the new year (on the west coast of the United States). What's your rush? There's no deadline. Dawnseeker2000 22:19, 3 January 2016 (UTC)Reply
No problem, I will wait in January. Wykx 22:24, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
Don't attempt to put a time limit on this. Please understand that I do have a life outside Wikipedia. There is no deadline on making WP better. Happy new year, Dawnseeker2000 22:41, 3 January 2016 (UTC)Reply
Exactly, but I thought my answer was in line with Wikipedia:There_is_no_deadline#View_three:_Don.27t_postpone_dispute_resolution. Kind regards. Wykx 22:50, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
Please kindly wait while I gather my thoughts. Changes need to be made with how these lists are done and, as you can imagine, changing direction in WP is a lot like herding cats. No one is intentionally holding up the resolution to the problems. Cheers, Dawnseeker2000 23:03, 3 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Good morning Wykx!

edit

Hi, first of all, let me apologize for placing a template message on your talk page. The reason that happened is because I reacted in frustration with some of the decisions and statements that you've made through our limited interactions. I want to to work with you to make WP better, but I'm having difficulty doing it. I don't want to sound rude, but I know that this is not going to sound good at all, but I just don't trust your decision making. Some of the ideas you've had are not good. Now keep in mind that there really hasn't been much communication between us, and I know that there's at least some effects with the language barrier.

So, you went to sleep instead of answering on the talk page. OK, fine, but like my edit summary said, I firmly believe that "you're not going to have a good reason for removing intensity information". There's just not going to be a valid reason at all. So I take this to mean that you're uncomfortable with the change. Why don't we let this ride for some time and see how it goes. I firmly believe that it's the way forward, and that it's the start of some other changes as well. I haven't written out all of my proposed changes because I don't have everything planned out yet, and because I'm procrastinating. Don't want to spend all the time typing it out :)

So, I hope you have a good day tomorrow. After two weeks off of work, I have a snow day tomorrow! Take care, Dawnseeker2000 04:53, 4 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your wishes. I appreciate your wish to improve and to better take into consideration into the list the effects of earthquakes. We'll work on that and I'm ready for compromise because I think your point is valid for a reader's perspective. Let's discuss it on Talk:List of earthquakes in 2016‎. Wykx 10:28, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

I think that I'm done trying to work with you. Your actions and statements lead me to believe that you lack credibility. Take it easy, Dawnseeker2000 19:42, 12 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

OK. Even if I don't know why. Wykx 19:46, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Yeah, that's the problem. You don't understand. Your work here is not good and your English is lacking to the point that it would probably help the English Wikipedia if you'd just stay away. Dawnseeker2000 03:38, 13 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your edit has been reverted as it was not constructive

edit

Please do not do that again, Dawnseeker2000 16:18, 18 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

:3

edit
  :3333333333333333333333333333333 Planecrashexpert (talk) 01:20, 20 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Thank you! Appreciated and... eaten :) Wykx 08:20, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Do you mind helping a fella' save his sanity?

edit

Well, I don't know if some of the editors noticed, but with the least arrogance, I updated most of the list of terrorist incidents since Setpbember 2015 and you may imagine what is it to be constipated with terror attacks and giving the fact editors including me have documented more then 50 terror attacks in 22 days (that's more then two per day), I kinda start to get sick of it. So I thought to my self, since you seem to have added some incidents, I should give you some of the tools I use to find terror attacks.

  • This website, is an indicator. It is not a source, but you can use it to find attacks and then search them in mainstream media.
  • This is kind of a dubious website, but it is also a good indicator, never use it a source, extremly biased.
  • This website is good for India, Pakistan and Afghanistan, it has information about Naxalite-Maoist insurgency in India and Taliban conflict in Pakistan and Afghanistan, as well as Blochistan.
  • I also find Yahoo News a very good source since it collects reports from several news agencies altogather.
  • For Israel news, well, if you want, from time to time, to see if I am doing a terrible job, you can use this website as an incidcator or a source (I never used it as a source anyways) for Israel.

I really hope to see more editors working on the list since I am starting to loose it really.. Thanks anyway.--Bolter21 (talk to me) 20:49, 22 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the links. I can't promise myself but I admit that there's an increase of terror attacks across the world that is difficult to follow... Wykx 23:35, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

What is your strange, uncommon syntax of Username

edit

Hi, why there is no hyperlink from the username to the userside? Every other user practise this good tradition. What is the sense? --82.192.229.198 (talk) 17:36, 28 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hi, thanks for this information. That was my mistake when creating the signature. I think it's corrected now. Wykx (talk) 18:26, 28 January 2016 (UTC)Reply
How was that happend? Do you have a special key? ^.^ --82.192.229.198 (talk) 00:24, 29 January 2016 (UTC)Reply
...When personnalizing the signature... Wykx (talk) 06:48, 29 January 2016 (UTC)Reply
Ah yeap! Thats a well known scriptfalse of wp-software. ;) Do you realy still belive in the santa claus? --82.192.229.198 (talk) 13:40, 30 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

List of current state leaders by assumption of office

edit

Howdy Wykx. Seeing as that article dispute is the first time we've encountered each other? I just wanted ya to know, I respect you position there. Therefore, I won't be trying to (for lack of better wording) twist your arm, to agree to my proposals, as that isn't my nature. We'll just have to agree to disagree :) GoodDay (talk) 00:04, 8 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Talk:List of state leaders in 2016#RfC: Inclusion of Palestine as a sub state of Israel

edit

 You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:List of state leaders in 2016#RfC: Inclusion of Palestine as a sub state of Israel. Could you please give your opinion on whether or not Palestine should be considered a separate sovereign entity from Israel? Many thanks Spirit Ethanol (talk) 15:47, 11 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

RfC closure at Jeremy Corbyn

edit

Thank you for taking the time and trouble to close the RfC at Jeremy Corbyn. The procedure for closure allows RfCs to be closed “by any uninvolved editor.” Clearly, you were not uninvolved. Please revert to the position prior to your closure. Thanks. Daicaregos (talk) 14:46, 15 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Actually if I have well understood the procedure for closure, Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Requests_for_closure is (point 1) "if the consensus is clear, any editor—even one involved in the discussion—may close the discussion". With no opposition on the compromise during 12 days, and one month after the RfC was opened, it seemed to me that is was a consensus. What do you think? Wykx (talk) 16:12, 15 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
Your compromise position was not one of the options given in the RfC. Consequently,it would be impossible to say the consensus for that option was clear, so 'point 1' could not apply. Also, several editors noted their opposition to the England, UK suggestion, this is just one example. I can't see any other possible close but 'no consensus', but that should be for an uninvolved editor to decide. Daicaregos (talk) 18:03, 15 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
Compromise: make a deal between different parties where each party gives up part of their demand. Wykx (talk) 20:02, 15 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Seeing as nobody opposed your compromise proposal (which I support), I see no problem with your closing the Rfc & your reading of its results. GoodDay (talk) 18:37, 15 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

  This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Daicaregos (talk) 10:16, 16 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

List of international presidential trips

edit

Hello Wykx, I am pretty sure you are aware of the changes made to List of international presidential trips made by Barack Obama regarding the change in title and its format. I think you are also aware that I renamed "List of presidential trips made by François Hollande" to List of international presidential trips made by François Hollande, the format of which was modelled after Barack Obama's list of trips. I renamed Hollande's list because I agreed that it should be clear that the list would only include international trips and not trips made locally within their country. I think that the format currently seen in Obama's trip list looks decent enough and should also be applied to Hollande's trip list. But before I would do such changes, I want to hear your opinion first as a major contributor to the page. Thanks! PatTag2659, a hopeful aviator (talk) 03:00, 21 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hi, yes it's ok to change! Thanks Wykx (talk) 07:26, 21 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Please comment on List of ongoing armed conflicts

edit

New updates on the Laos insurgency talk section, can you please add your opinion? Skycycle (talk) 19:44, 3 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

France edits

edit

Wykx, I undid the edits because French Guiana, Guadeloupe, Reunion and Mayotte are non sovereign territories. If not please explain why. thanks, tom991

They are departments and then they have almost the same law as metropolitan territory, like Corsica and contrary to other overseas territories. But I'm not opposed to display them on the list. Wykx (talk) 15:55, 20 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Nominated for deletion

edit

The recently created Israel Palestine conflict page is nominated for deletion in connection to the preceding community discussion. You are welcome to express your opinion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Israel Palestine conflict.GreyShark (dibra) 14:51, 11 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hello. I wanted to let you know that one of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive.--Namnguyenvn (talk) 12:13, 6 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

If you'd just say what you're doing and why...

edit

These situations could be avoided. Dawnseeker2000 21:06, 7 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Sorry I was updating the article at the same time and was going to update... You were too fast to react... Wykx (talk) 21:09, 7 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Ongoing conflicts map

edit

I saw you added Mozambique to orange, thank you! Could you also add Senegal as yellow again, since the Casamance conflict had a flare-up in April and I included it once more. I think there might be 1 or 2 more changes needed, but I can take a look later tonight and let you know. Skycycle (talk) 12:16, 2 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

  Done Wykx (talk) 12:25, 2 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Oneworld and MOS:DATEFORMAT

edit

The Oneworld article uses month day, year format throughout the article. As per Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers, it is to remain that way unless the subject is strongly tied to a national subject that uses a different format. Oneworld is not tied to such a culture. NYCRuss 22:51, 11 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I just opened a talk section Talk:Oneworld#Date_format. Please answer there as it is more appropriate place to discuss. Wykx (talk) 22:57, 11 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

edit

Hello, Wykx. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Aviation accident templates

edit

If a crash has an article, an editor can add it to the templates. Redlinks are always removed as are redirects. Bombings like LaGuardia Airport bombing or terrorist attacks like Lod Airport massacre aren't to be put in the templates either. If you think 2016 Tio Táxi Aéreo crash isn't notable, I happen to agree with you but it does have an article at this moment. I proded it. Should that fail, a AFD is likely to end in deletion....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 01:20, 9 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Civil conflict in the Philippines

edit

Mr. Wykx. The conflict between the Communists and the government of the Philippines has been completed and the final signing of a peace agreement in August. Both sides have made a pact to combat drug cartels in these islands. Today the current conflict in the Philippines is Philippine Drug War. It is similar to the Mexican drug war.--Baba Mica (talk) 13:17, 12 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hello, can I copy your comment on Talk:List of ongoing armed conflicts or can you put it by yourself because this is the place where it should be discussed? Please also see previous discussions Talk:List_of_ongoing_armed_conflicts/Archive_9#Philippine_drug_war and Talk:List_of_ongoing_armed_conflicts/Archive_9#Philippine_Drug_War_2. And the peace deal with Maoist is not fully signed.Wykx (talk) 14:43, 12 December 2016 (UTC)Reply
There is no such thing as "Civil conflict in the Philippines" - it is a fringe article, trying to make it look that 2 poorly related insurgencies in the country are somehow interlinked.GreyShark (dibra) 07:27, 13 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

License tagging for File:Ongoing conflicts around the world in 2015.svg

edit

Thanks for uploading File:Ongoing conflicts around the world in 2015.svg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 16:35, 26 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Redirection of list of state leaders in 2016 and list of state leaders in 2017 to list of state leaders in the 21st century

edit

On 4 January Tahc redirected List of state leaders in 2016 and List of state leaders in 2017 to List of state leaders in the 21st century without any reason. Neither I, nor you, nor other contributors of these articles expressed the accord to these action which I consider abusive. Please sustain me in the action for annulment of this action,express your protest to TAHC and ask the reversion of redirections. Thank you

Bogdan Uleia (talk)

Pending changes reviewer granted

edit
 

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

RfC on 5% threshold

edit

You may want to participate in this RfC regarding to the inclusion of candidates in election infoboxes. MB298 (talk) 01:49, 3 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

English spelling corrections

edit

Hello Wykx! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I have noticed two spelling mistakes you make in your edits:

  • fightings -> fighting
  • militians -> militants or militiamen

Fighting is always singular in English, if one wants to say it in plural form, it would be "fights". "Militian" is a word in Romanian, but not in English. Hope this fixes a few things, good luck on your future edits! CentreLeftRight 00:35, 13 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

@CentreLeftRight: Thanks, appreciated! And thanks for the corrections in the article. Wykx (talk) 08:43, 13 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Overlinking and decorative flags

edit

If you want to link every country-name in sight, please justify why the general country article is useful—rather than a more specific offspring or section link that might be relevant to the reader.

Why is a flag icon relevant to readers when the country-name is given in the same table cell?

Tony (talk) 11:51, 18 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hi, could you open the discussion on the Talk:List of international presidential trips made by Barack Obama? I'm not the only one deciding. Wykx (talk) 12:39, 18 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Kasaï-Central clashes (2016–present)

edit

Thanks for creating Kasaï-Central clashes (2016–present). I don't see which reference mentions his son. Could you please cite that?Zigzig20s (talk) 09:11, 20 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

I've removed it. Feel free to add it back if there is a reference. Thank you.Zigzig20s (talk) 09:31, 20 February 2017 (UTC)Reply
@Zigzig20s: This is a one link for example, explaining it in French: RDC: affrontements meurtriers à Tshimbulu, dans le Kasaï-Central I will add it once I have time even if I think this link is already present on the page. Wykx (talk) 09:36, 20 February 2017 (UTC)Reply
I think they're saying Kamwina Nsapu had a father who was the local chief, but they don't talk about Kamwina Nsapu's son.Zigzig20s (talk) 09:43, 20 February 2017 (UTC)Reply
Ok yes in the doubt you're right to remove it. Wykx (talk) 10:21, 20 February 2017 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of earthquakes in 2017, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cerro Punta. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:00, 3 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Articles for deletion

edit

Please do not close discussions of articles listed for deletion if you have expressed an opinion in the discussion, such as Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2017 Singapore Changi Airport Taxiway Collision. Doing so may breach WP:INVOLVED, so its best to either participate, or close. A possible exception is when the nominator withdraws the nomination, in which case the discussion may be closed by any editor. Mjroots (talk) 10:53, 7 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Batwa-Luba clashes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Katanga. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:00, 11 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hello: request for feedback on proposal for "Palestine-Israel conflict" article

edit

I noticed you are a relatively frequent editor of that article and so..... since I am very new here to "serious" contributing on WP and so rather than just try to go and create what I propose and then submit it; I instead wish for feedback on how substantive and possibly useful what I suggest might be, here is what I am thinking: https://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Talk:Israeli%E2%80%93Palestinian_conflict#Hello.2C_new_here.2C_and_I_perceive_a_GRAVE_.28.26_not_even_mentioned_offhand.29_total-omission_of_the_possible_actual_ancient_root_of_this_conflict

Yes I now realize the word "grave" is too much. Tell me what you think. Thank you for time and attention. Sinsearach (talk) 15:37, 20 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for replacing the Wikipedia citation

edit

Hello, I was going to tell you about when you replaced a Wikipedia citation on List of presidential trips made by Donald Trump. I was hoping that someone in the future would replace it with something in the news. Thanks --Cass

Re: Your reversion on List of rail accidents (2010–present)

edit

On 17 June 2017, I entered an accident on this list regarding an Australian collision between a passenger train and vehicle which resulted in one fatality. Hours later, you removed this entry claiming that the entry was "not even notable for a list". There are, however, several other incidents such as derailments which, although caused major disruption, did not result in fatalities and yet they did not get removed. I would like you to give me a logical explanation as to why this entry was "not notable", yet other entries such as the 14 February 2017 non-fatal Australian incident at Kangaroo Flat, Victoria are notable. --Tomcollett (talk) 03:16, 24 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

There was a discussion on Talk:List_of_rail_accidents_(2010–present)#Why_list_non-notable_accidents.3F. If another accident is not notable too, you can remove it too. Wykx (talk) 06:49, 24 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Please comment on Talk:Monarchy of Canada

edit

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Monarchy of Canada. Legobot (talk) 04:31, 1 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

File:List of international presidential trips made by Donald Trump

edit

Hi Wykx, I noticed File:List of international presidential trips made by Donald Trump.svg doesn't have Vatican City highlighted. As he (Trump) visited it on May 24, could you update it to reflect this. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Calbow (talkcontribs) 07:26, 9 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Oh yes indeed well spotted I forgot when switching to map with South Sudan.   Done Wykx (talk) 09:00, 9 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

List of presidential trips made by Donald Trump- Updating the Map

edit

I noticed that you make lots of edits to this page. I have figured out how to edit the map within the template, but not how to transfer the edits to the actual page itself. Are you able to do this? And if so, how? Thanks! Avilan01 (talk) 16:45, 14 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

In [2] click on "Upload a new version of this file" Wykx (talk) 19:02, 14 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

edit

Hello, Wykx. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Please comment on Talk:List of Prime Ministers of the United Kingdom

edit

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of Prime Ministers of the United Kingdom. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 4 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of presidential trips made by Emmanuel Macron, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Chambord and Beauval (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:37, 18 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Please comment on Talk:Abkhazia

edit

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Abkhazia. Legobot (talk) 04:32, 4 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Please comment on Talk:Holocaust denial

edit

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Holocaust denial. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 7 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Please comment on Talk:Poisoning of Sergei and Yulia Skripal

edit

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Poisoning of Sergei and Yulia Skripal. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 11 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Australia's head of state, again

edit

Howdy, an rfc has opened at Monarchy of Australia concerning head of state. GoodDay (talk) 20:15, 30 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

edit

Hello, Wykx. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Armed conflicts by year

edit

 Template:Armed conflicts by year has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. -- Trialpears (Talk) 12:20, 15 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Zoran Tegeltija

edit
 

The article Zoran Tegeltija has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Cahk (talk) 15:03, 21 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of richest people in the world, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Amazon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:35, 21 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Consistency over Haitian prime minister.

edit

Howdy. Would you please check over the articles Haiti, Jean-Michel Lapin & Fritz-William Michel. At the moment, they support my edits at List of current heads of state and government article. GoodDay (talk) 22:21, 23 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Fixed. Wykx (talk) 22:52, 23 February 2020 (UTC)Reply
Made further correction on other related articles. It's likely, when Michel was nominated for pm on 22 July 2019, some editor jumped the gun & edited him as 'acting pm'. GoodDay (talk) 23:23, 23 February 2020 (UTC)Reply
edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of earthquakes in 2020, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Saray (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:31, 24 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Edit war

edit

Stop edit warring. Per WP:ONUS, you need consensus to add controversial material – it doesn't matter how long that material has been on the article. I've started the discussion here. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Don't forget to share a Thanks ) 21:26, 24 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

@Nice4What: OK I do agree with change but I thought the section was introduced a long time ago and thus was necessiting consensus to be removed since the section was added and subsequently edited by several editors. In that case I followed the scheme here: Wikipedia:BOLD,_revert,_discuss_cycle. Apparently we didn't agree on whether a new consensus was previously established or not. Wykx (talk) 22:06, 24 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Greenland and the EU

edit

Hi. Your recent edit in the Identity and Democracy article added a map that shows Greenland as having MEPs. This is not true, since Greenland left the EU in 1985. --Ritchie92 (talk) 08:23, 15 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Updated thanks. Wykx (talk) 08:56, 15 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:25, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia Wars and the Israel-Palestine conflict...please fill out my survey?

edit

Hello :) I am writing my MA dissertation on Wikipedia Wars and the Israel-Palestine conflict, and I noticed that you have contributed to those pages. My dissertation will look at the process of collaborative knowledge production on the Israel-Palestine conflict, and the effect it has on bias in the articles. This will involve understanding the profiles and motivations of editors, contention/controversy and dispute resolution in the talk pages, and bias in the final article.

For more information, you can check out my meta-wiki research page or my user page, where I will be posting my findings when I am done.

I would greatly appreciate if you could take 5 minutes to fill out this quick survey before 8 August 2021.

Participation in this survey is entirely voluntary and anonymous. There are no foreseeable risks nor benefits to you associated with this project.

Thanks so much,

Sarah Sanbar

Sarabnas I'm researching Wikipedia Questions? 17:12, 21 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply