User talk:Tom Morris/Archive 107

Latest comment: 1 month ago by MediaWiki message delivery in topic Wikidata weekly summary #640
Archive 100 Archive 105 Archive 106 Archive 107

Please have a look at this article

Hi. This article was supposed to be deleted back in 2007. Could you do the deed? Otherwise, could you explain why should it stay up after the vote was to delete? I don't understand the way Wikipedia works very well yet and I'm wondering if it's simply eluded the admins or if there's more to the situation. Also, if what I did (contacting you) is the wrong way to go about notifying someone about an article that has been on the death row for too long, could you tell me what's the correct course of action? Harvastum (talk) 23:45, 23 May 2024 (UTC)

@Tom Morris may I have your attention? Harvastum (talk) 09:10, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The article was deleted in 2007 following the deletion discussion. An article being deleted in the past does not preclude someone from creating a new article on the topic (as someone did in 2012). There being an old article that was deleted doesn't mean a new article on the same topic must also be deleted, unless the new article has similar problems to the old one. (For an administrator to delete it as a recreation of a previously deleted article, it would be covered by the rule described at WP:G4—the fact it was recreated quite a number of years after the 2007 deletion, has been present on the site for twelve years, and has been edited a whole lot by lots of different editors would make it unsuitable for speedy deletion on that basis.)
If you think the current article should be deleted, it would need a new deletion discussion to take place. Other than the procedural matter of it having previously been deleted, is there anything in particular that concerns you about the article—in particular, related to sourcing or notability? WP:AFD and WP:BEFORE explain the rules and process on deletion. —Tom Morris (talk) 09:28, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
I don't have an opinion on the article, I just saw the banner saying that this article was voted on and deletion was chosen, so it looked like someone overlooked it. Is that banner supposed to be there if the article now has better justification being there?
That said, I looked through the edit history out of curiosity and it does seem like edits that added anything else than minor interpunction, or links fixes (apparently, largely automated) come from red usernames who only contributed to this and another article, that has also been deleted in 2007 as a part of the same group of articles.
I apologize for my Wikipedia illiteracy, I hope you are not too bothered by me. If you feel that another deletion discussion is warranted, I would encourage you to start it. Either way, imma skidaddle. Harvastum (talk) 02:14, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
Absolutely no worries at all, and no need to apologise. Generally, if an article is nominated for deletion a second time (or third, fourth etc...), the deletion discussion will often refer back to issues raised in the prior discussion. If there's still a deficit in sourcing, that may support deletion—or if points were raised in the previous deletion discussion and they've been adequately resolved, that may be an important point to make in support of retaining the article. The retention of the links to the previous deletion discussions on the talk page is there to support editors in improving the article or contributing to proper consideration of future deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 10:54, 28 May 2024 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day Quality Title Tagged with…
52   Dave Kleiman (talk) Add sources
262   Dallon Weekes (talk) Add sources
91   TheHunter (talk) Add sources
2,071   Deep learning (talk) Add sources
372   False imprisonment (talk) Add sources
225   Random sample consensus (talk) Add sources
68   Legality (talk) Cleanup
22   Harassment in the United Kingdom (talk) Cleanup
419   Elite theory (talk) Cleanup
70   Disability Discrimination Act 1995 (talk) Expand
7,664   Bitcoin (talk) Expand
3,292   Rape (talk) Expand
782   Unicorn (finance) (talk) Unencyclopaedic
108   Causation (law) (talk) Unencyclopaedic
17   Henderson v Merrett Syndicates Ltd (talk) Unencyclopaedic
132   Synthetic media (talk) Merge
661   Failure mode and effects analysis (talk) Merge
4   Improved-definition television (talk) Merge
45   Refusing to assist a police officer (talk) Wikify
83   Omission (law) (talk) Wikify
129   Economics of bitcoin (talk) Wikify
106   Aleph Alpha (talk) Orphan
7   Howard Marine and Dredging Co Ltd v A Ogden & Sons (Excavations) Ltd (talk) Orphan
3   Eunomics (talk) Orphan
4   Loss of right in English law (talk) Stub
121   Cemita (talk) Stub
8   Cyril Salmon, Baron Salmon (talk) Stub
4   Darren Hawco (talk) Stub
206   Deep Web (film) (talk) Stub
6,068   Ilya Sutskever (talk) Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:36, 30 May 2024 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #630

<languages/>

Wikidata weekly summary #631

Weekly Summary #632

Wikidata weekly summary #633

Wikidata weekly summary #635

Thanks!

 
Thanks for participating in the June 2024 backlog drive!

You scored 266 points while adding citations to articles during WikiProject Reliability's first {{citation needed}} backlog drive, earning you this citation barnstar. Thanks for helping out!

Pichpich (talk) 16:28, 9 July 2024 (UTC)

Thanks, Pichpich. It was good fun. I very much look forward to the next one! —Tom Morris (talk) 16:32, 9 July 2024 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day Quality Title Tagged with…
78   Magistrates' court (England and Wales) (talk) Add sources
23   Chesaning, Michigan (talk) Add sources
480   Lawsuit (talk) Add sources
247   Private company limited by shares (talk) Add sources
995   Mining (talk) Add sources
2,195   Plea bargain (talk) Add sources
48   Courts of Scotland (talk) Cleanup
275   Summary judgment (talk) Cleanup
248   Dungan people (talk) Cleanup
109   Small claims court (talk) Expand
355   Jury trial (talk) Expand
12   Summary jurisdiction (talk) Expand
1,395   Zombie (talk) Unencyclopaedic
49   Distraint (talk) Unencyclopaedic
579   Prosecutor (talk) Unencyclopaedic
124   Legal case (talk) Merge
168   Debt collection (talk) Merge
324   Foreclosure (talk) Merge
63   Juries in England and Wales (talk) Wikify
34   Criminal law of Canada (talk) Wikify
17   Funding Evil (talk) Wikify
2   Cannabis trafficking penalties for juveniles (talk) Orphan
2   McDonald v Horn (talk) Orphan
2   The Libel Tourist (talk) Orphan
464   Bury St Edmunds and Stowmarket (UK Parliament constituency) (talk) Stub
40   Marcus Antonius Primus (talk) Stub
346   Will Tanner (talk) Stub
51   Writ of execution (talk) Stub
33   Attachment (law) (talk) Stub
109   Jack Abbott (politician) (talk) Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:13, 10 July 2024 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #536

Books & Bytes – Issue 63

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 63, May – June 2024

  • One new partner
  • 1Lib1Ref
  • Spotlight: References check

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --12:16, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #637

Wikidata weekly summary #638

Wikidata weekly summary #639

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day Quality Title Tagged with…
266   M'Naghten rules (talk) Add sources
216   Damages (talk) Add sources
2   Yvonne Carter (talk) Add sources
42   Judiciary of Israel (talk) Add sources
24   Defence of property (talk) Add sources
17   Causation in English law (talk) Add sources
72   South African criminal law (talk) Cleanup
45   Confession (law) (talk) Cleanup
40   Outraging public decency (talk) Cleanup
104   2024 in politics (talk) Expand
136   Murder in English law (talk) Expand
877   Double jeopardy (talk) Expand
83   Automatism (law) (talk) Unencyclopaedic
41   Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee (talk) Unencyclopaedic
524   Burden of proof (law) (talk) Unencyclopaedic
241   Complex instruction set computer (talk) Merge
42   Transnational Corporation of Nigeria (talk) Merge
571   Stations of the Cross (talk) Merge
78   Law of Northern Ireland (talk) Wikify
64   Alex Hepburn (cricketer) (talk) Wikify
636   Trust (law) (talk) Wikify
3   Legal cost finance (talk) Orphan
40   Juvenile sex offenders in the United States (talk) Orphan
3   Bunny Industries v FSW Enterprises (talk) Orphan
65   Adam Thompson (politician) (talk) Stub
6   Implied assertion (talk) Stub
78   Freddie van Mierlo (talk) Stub
73   Samantha Niblett (talk) Stub
8   Trial of the facts (talk) Stub
164   Liam Conlon (talk) Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:47, 7 August 2024 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #640