Welcome...

edit

Hello, Sarah312x, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! Nick Moyes (talk) 11:15, 30 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

P.S.: Some pages you might like to check out are:

 
Finding stubs and making them grow

A stub is an article that provides at least a basic definition but does not go much beyond it. It may not be the perfect article yet, but each stub should have the potential to become one. See Wikipedia:Find or fix a stub for ways to locate stubs. For example, click what links here on that same page, or on Template:Stub (the stub notice).

Still not enough stubs? Then try Wikipedia:Requests for page expansion, or set the threshold for stub display in your user Preferences. That option sets a number of characters threshold value. Links to articles with fewer characters are shown in dark red. This makes it very easy to spot stubs. If the stub notice is a generic notice consider sorting the stub into a stub category.

To add this auto-updating template to your user page, use {{totd}}

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

edit

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day Quality Title Tagged with…
20   Steven Cole (talk) Add sources
38   Joan Tompkins (talk) Add sources
471   The New Scooby-Doo Movies (talk) Add sources
74   History of Australia (1901–45) (talk) Add sources
1,214   The Partridge Family (talk) Add sources
191   Brando Eaton (talk) Add sources
90   Kidd Video (talk) Cleanup
80   Dink, the Little Dinosaur (talk) Cleanup
7   Bernard C. Schoenfeld (talk) Cleanup
284   Melanie Papalia (talk) Expand
325   Dragnet (franchise) (talk) Expand
760   Cold Case (talk) Expand
216   The Raccoons (talk) Unencyclopaedic
1,580   Batman (TV series) (talk) Unencyclopaedic
61   Howard Sprague (talk) Unencyclopaedic
110   Drone strike (talk) Merge
10   The Nurses (ABC TV series) (talk) Merge
32   Dub localization (talk) Merge
216   Police Woman (TV series) (talk) Wikify
352   Rape in Pakistan (talk) Wikify
11   Mio Tomonaga (talk) Wikify
3   Consuelo Morales Elizondo (talk) Orphan
5   La Patrulla chiflada (talk) Orphan
3   Lola de la Torre (talk) Orphan
3   WNB Tower (talk) Stub
64   Sports Reference (talk) Stub
3   Toni Dunlop (talk) Stub
5   1998 in Sweden (talk) Stub
25   Hrach Titizian (talk) Stub
5   Kirsten Barnes (talk) Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 05:54, 30 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your first badge

edit

Hi Sarah312x, you mention on your user page that you don't have any badges yet, so here's one for you. This service award is for people who have been registered one day, and made one edit. As your edit count and length of time increase, so will the level of your service award, as shown at the page I linked for you. You can even update these yourself as you reach new levels. Cmr08 (talk) 07:37, 30 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

 
This user is a
Registered Editor
and is entitled to display this Service Badge.

A source of help

edit

Here's a place you can get started. Try the Wikipedia Adventure and maybe it'll help! Go ahead. Contact me here if you need any help, have a question, or would like to comment. —Preceding undated comment added 19:59, 30 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

edit
 
Hi Sarah312x! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 03:32, Thursday, February 1, 2018 (UTC)

You're welcome! :) GermanGamer77 19:50, 1 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

woops! Thank you! xo Sarah312x (talk) 04:11, 2 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

edit
 
Hi Sarah312x! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 03:26, Monday, February 5, 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Prestige Economics (February 5)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KJP1 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KJP1 (talk) 14:16, 5 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Prestige Economics for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Prestige Economics is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prestige Economics until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:27, 16 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Deletion discussion about Critical Instruction

edit

Hello, Sarah312x,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Critical Instruction should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Critical Instruction .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

TheLongTone (talk) 15:36, 28 February 2018 (UTC)Reply