User talk:Kukini/Archive20

Pls reblock sharedipedu

User_talk:216.162.22.136 is at it again, now in MurderLeadSongDog 17:10, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

Questions

I don't understand the fair use rationale for uploading screenshots. I think I'm getting into trouble because a lot of my images are being dumped because of my inadequate fair use rationales. Can you help? Also, may I create new Categories? "Board games based on television programs" and "Board games based on films"? Thank you! TimmyTruck 21:58, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

PLS BAN TIPTOPE HE SPAM MY PAGE AND SAY I TELL UNTRUTHS WHEN IN FACT I TELL TRUTSH —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.51.53.66 (talk) 00:07, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

I accidentally added a duplicate page. I need to remove http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Sarasota_memorial_hospital and leave http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Sarasota_Memorial_Hospital. Do you know how to do that? Kallesti 15:22, 30 October 2007 (UTC)Kallesti

Thanks

Thank you for your help with the vandal. He is giving me a hard time because I nominated his article for AfD. Regards, WWGB 07:12, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

Thanks!

Someone vandalized my Userspace! But a little angel came along and fixed it! Thank you! You can thank others by using {{subst:Vangel}}! Gscshoyru 11:34, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for reverting my talk page for me. I've been busy reverting vandalism, and that person's been harassing me for some time. The Chronic 05:46, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

THe CES Conspiracy

Hi Kukini. I find "THe CES Conspiracy" to be very offensive. Please take down that page as it has no relevance to the school (Sherman Oaks Center for Enriched Studies) whatsoever and is completely fabricated as a joke. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.87.134.7 (talk) 06:31, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

HELP PLEASE

http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/The_CES_Conspiracy

This link has nothing to do with SOCES.

http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Sherman_Oaks_Center_for_Enriched_Studies

Please take the CES Conspiracy down.

For what it is worth, I just tagged the first site as a speedy (as vandalism...watch those time bandits) --TeaDrinker 06:40, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

The WikiProject Universities Newsletter: Issue II (October 2007)

The October 2007 issue of the WikiProject Universities newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you for your continued support of WikiProject Universities! —Noetic Sage 19:56, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

Washington Univ. alumni

Hello. Regarding your recent "requests for verification" on the List of Washington University alumni article: are you asking that it be verified that the marked individuals attended the school, or are you asking for some other form of verification about these individuals? Ropcat 01:32, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

Umm...

I have an account, I just don't bother to log on anymore. User:NATO.Caliber 81.230.100.129 19:54, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

I have been editing the X's episode summary because is messed and I need to see if what I'm doing is good because sometimes it doesn't work. Thanks for the warning I will try to write something about what I'm doing —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.79.119.117 (talk) 05:17, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

>>>>

Just as well I found you.. I was Recent Change patrolling (steadily becoming a hobby of mine lol) and I spotted an article [ http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Junior_Reserve_Officers%27_Training_Corps ]. It had been vandalised, however, someone who I presume intented to undo the vandalism actually reverted it to a previous vandalised state. As you may have been able to see, the article is distraught (perhaps you could fix it? On it's history, the good edit is currently "01:30, 3 November 2007 Iridescent"). Now, another thing you may be able to help with would be to...well, assist me. I want to know how to revert edits not just the one before me. I mean, if you select the page's history and 'undo', how would you change the second-last edit, or multiple edits at once? Dlae ^{Hit meh!} 19:51, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks, I think I got it...Yeah, I got it.Dlae ^{Hit meh!} 11:53, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

Not vandalism but clarification and cleanup

Hi, I was doing some cleanup in pages related to various castes (groups). The section was irrelevant and was a remnant of an old vandalism by User:Mudaliar related to an arbitration case [1]. Can you please undo the reverts?

Lathead 16:22, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

• OK...thanks. --Kukini ^{hablame aqui} 16:23, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

Re: empty EL section

In the last month or so, Template:Geolinks-US-cityscale has been modified for some reason to remove all the links. I don't know why, and there are a lot of other geography editors who are unhappy as well; apparently, another "realm" of Wikipedia did this without consulting us. For a long time, there were four external links on the Geolinks template (or the Mapit-US-cityscale, which redirects to it); not too long ago it was reduced to two, and then they were cut out altogether. I'm hoping that something can be decided that can be put back as an EL for the Mapit; as someone else said, it makes it look like the EL sections for many thousands of articles were vandalised. That's why, by the way, it looks as if there have never been ELs; you'd have to view it with a previous version of the Mapit to understand. Go read Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Geographical_coordinates#Geolinks-coord_Issues for more information; it's both enlightening and depressing. Nyttend 12:50, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Latin Kings

If you are going to discuss the Latin Kings then get the facts . I am a 4 generation Latin Kings and do not appreciate bias or lies of NY and Chicago Kings. We do not have a rivalry and New York Latin Kings have always acknowledged Chicago as Motherland.

David Torruella—Preceding unsigned comment added by Dermensch74 (talk • contribs)

Block

i suggest you block that last ip address even to read it because ive read about that shool and they do bad things iv seen there stuff i know a kid josh who is always editing he says and he is mad that the school gets block from editing i suggest you block to read stuff from wikipedia for about a week —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ripper man5 (talk • contribs) 15:20, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the welcome

Thanks for the welcome - I appreciate it - but I've been editing for a few years, reading for a lot longer ;) --lk 17:37, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

User:MaryPoppins878

You recently made a comment to them about their edit summaries. If you wouldn't mind looking at my talk page, there is an ongoing discussion about this user and the administrator helping has been unable to continue due to personal time constraints. Any help you can offer would be greatly appreciated. In short, we believe this user to be a sockpuppet of a banned user. IrishLass0128 18:49, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

ACID Atom

The article Atom, which you voted for the Article Collaboration and Improvement Drive on September 4, and was removed on September 11, because on one got around to choosing it as the winner, has been renominated and needs votes. Zginder 16:10, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

Thank you

Click there to open your card! → → →

Dearest Kukni,
Thank you for your participation in my RFA, which closed successfully with 137 supports, 22 opposes, and 5 neutrals. Your support is very much appreciated and I look forward to proving you right. I would like to give special thanks to The_undertow and Phoenix-wiki for their co-nominations. Thank you again and best regards.

Lara❤Love 19:40, 10 November 2007 (UTC) Credits: This RFA thanks was inspired by The Random Editor's RFA thanks which was inspired by Phaedriel's RFA thanks.

Someone new for you to welcome

Heya!

I've found someone for you to welcome. User Ricree101 has been contributing for almost a year, but hasn't been welcomed yet. I would do it, but you have such a nice template. ;-) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lawrencekhoo (talk • contribs) 23:49, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

LGBT WikiProject Newsletter

Delivered on 12:00, 1 November 2007 (UTC).

Thanks...

for the gift. It provides a rather interesting overview of my preferences. 194.112.32.101 20:00, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

You helped choose Atom as this week's WP:ACID winner

Zginder 00:34, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

Introduction to Wikipedia

Hey, thanks for the intro to Wikipedia on my talk page, however, I don't see myself being too involved with the website apart from making minor edits every now and then to keep things in shape when something looks out of place. Because of this, don't be offended if I removed your intro from my talk page. Once again, thanks, but I would rather keep my talk page free for actual discussions should any problems arise as opposed to meaningless clutter. Americanadian 11:34, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

Smallville

sorry about that i was going to move him to former cast.but then i saw that he was under original cast.my mistakeBleek25 17:54, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thanks for catching that vandalism on my userpage for me! нмŵוτнτ 17:51, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

This is a couple of days late but thank you for reverting the vandalism on my talk page also it is much appreciated. MarnetteD | Talk 15:26, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

Your reverts

Hi, is there a reason why you keep reverting the redirect on the flammability article? I was trying to redirect the article to the proper term: inflammability. Please clarify why you are reverting? 172.129.15.175 (talk) 22:49, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

Actually, only one user on the discussion page felt that the term flammability was proper. For an encyclopedia, I think we should use the grammatically correct term for the title of the article and then clarify in the body of the article the linguistic ambiguity. 172.129.15.175 (talk) 22:53, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

how did u find me [70.108.104.96]?

In this big wiki world, however dd u find/come across me?
Watch thisinteresting vid..
{ 70.108.104.96 (talk) 07:43, 22 November 2007 (UTC) }

Thanks

Thank you for protecting my user page while I slept. I appreciate it. KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 12:47, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

Change to User:202.45.119.133 block warning

I noticed that you changed my warning from 'permanent' to 'longer', saying that permanent blocks are rare in your edit summary. I understand that even static IP address will change hands eventually, but it seems to me that Wikipedia is far too forgiving of vandalism, which probably constitutes more than half of each day's edits. If it's clear that someone is only vandalising the site, why not just get rid of the problem? – SJL 03:48, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

Reblock User_talk:205.124.35.4

Please reblock User_talk:205.124.35.4. Vandalizing again. --Ori.livneh (talk) 19:48, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

You helped choose Poverty as this week's WP:ACID winner

Zginder (talk) (Contrib) 22:38, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

The WikiProject Universities Newsletter: Issue III (November 2007)

The November 2007 issue of the WikiProject Universities newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you for your continued support of WikiProject Universities! Noetic Sage 19:52, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

LGBT WikiProject Newsletter

Delivered on 20:05, 3 December 2007 (UTC). SatyrBot 21:16, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

adding an external link

hi, I don't mean to spam. Can you please tell me what you consider an inappropriate link. I was linking to content--scholarly bibliographies that I thought were worthwhile. If I shouldn't just tell me.sorry. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Teeveegal (talk • contribs) 18:20, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

I've notice this too. Teeveegal, Your contributions to wikipedia consist entirely of adding external links to carmun.com and is considered WP:Spam. Looking through your contributions as a whole, all are carmun.com related only. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a link farm. You're here to improve Wikipedia -- not just to funnel readers off Wikipedia and onto carmun.com, right? Hu12 18:27, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

Texas State Bank Building

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Texas State Bank Building, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Texas State Bank Building. B. Wolterding (talk) 19:25, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

! my page was deleted!

I made an article on the Ghosts of Screetown and it got deleted and I don't know why. Can you help me please?

--Lollipop-3 (talk) 04:50, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

Revision

He did not earn the Arabian Barnstar....I put that on his page as a joke a few days ago and he keeps reverting it. It should not be awarded to him.

Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.254.251.152 (talk) 01:01, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

part 2: !my page was deleted!

thank you, however, i just don't have enough time to read all that stuff. I guess wikipedia will just have to go on without an article on the Ghosts of Screetown if I have to read all of that first....:{ Lollipop-3 (talk) 07:05, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

UD Alcohol

It's not vandalism per your suggestion. I dispute the addition of "alcohol abuse" as a section to the University of Delaware article. The editor only cites how many alcohol-related arrests there were on the UD campus without providing evidence that UD's numbers of underage alcohol consumption are so significantly out of proportion that it deserves mention in wikipedia. Only schools deemed "party schools" by either Playboy and/or the Princeton Review have such sections. Lacking any evidence to support why UD is a unique situation, I moved the section for deletion.--128.175.224.210 (talk) 07:10, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

:)

X××x××pink×jellocreature××x××X (talk) has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

D

X××x××pink×jellocreature××x××X (talk) 04:37, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

Nice work

Nice work on that ip vandal. By the time I'd realised they were still at their games, you had them blocked, and my userpage cleaned up as well. Cheers. -- Longhair\^talk 15:48, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

It appears the editor's signature directly above my post is causing this green text to appear. I can't seem to locate anything on your talk page causing the eyesore, so I suspect some fiddling has occured within their preferences. Ugly indeed :) -- Longhair\^talk 15:50, 18 December 2007 (UTC)