Jim Hardie

Hello. I am pleased to receive your message and will try to let you have an answer on this page as soon as possible. Please put my talk page on your watchlist so that the whole conversation takes place here. Best wishes. --Jim Hardie (talk) 12:53, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

Hadlow Cricket Club

Thanks for sorting the referencing out, looks much better now! Mjroots (talk) 09:59, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

March 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Slindon, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Slindon was changed by Jim Hardie (u) (t) deleting 14616 characters on 2008-03-09T12:11:36+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 12:11, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

History of English cricket to 1696

Thanks for all your good work on this and other cricket history articles. JH (talk page) 09:39, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Slindon Cricket Club

Hi. I've nominated Slindon Cricket Club, an article you worked on, for consideration to appear on the Main Page as part of Wikipedia:Did you know. You can see the hook for the article at Template talk:Did you know#Articles created/expanded on March 9, where you can improve it if you see fit. Mjroots (talk) 12:37, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Can you sort out the inline citations issue on this article? Currently failed DYK but will pass if this can be done. Mjroots (talk) 09:16, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

Yes, that looks fine. Should get on the main page sometime soon now. Michael. Mjroots (talk) 20:29, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

DYK

On 16 March, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Slindon Cricket Club, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Congrats! --Espresso Addict (talk) 03:44, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

Userboxes

Have a userbox too! You can move this to your user page if you wish. Mjroots (talk) 17:00, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

A fact from the article Slindon Cricket Club, which this user created or significantly contributed to, has been featured in the Did you know... section on the Main Page.

You can find plenty of user boxes at WP:UBX. I've got so many I've had to create a sub-page for them! Mjroots (talk) 20:31, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hi, and welcome to the Military history WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.

A few features that you might find helpful:

• Our navigation box points to most of the useful pages within the project.
• The announcement and open task box is updated very frequently. You can watchlist it if you're interested; or, you can add it directly to your user page by including {{WPMILHIST Announcements}} there.
• Most important discussions take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you watchlist it.
• The project has several departments, which handle article quality assessment, detailed article and content review, writing contests, article logistics, and other tasks.
• We have a number of task forces that focus on specific topics, nations, periods, and conflicts.
• We've developed a style guide that covers article structure and content, template use, categorization, and many other issues of interest.
• If you're looking for something to work on, there are many articles that need attention.
• The project has a stress hotline available for your use.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask one of the project coordinators, or any experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! Kirill 19:05, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXV (March 2008)

The March 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 01:34, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

List of early English cricketers to 1786

I see that you've been working on this list. The Earl of Sussex article doesn't list one by the name of Thomas Dacre, so it looks as though HS Altham (given as the source) may have made a mistake with the name. Going by the date, it looks as though it possibly should be Thomas Lennard, 1st Earl of Sussex, but I'm not sufficiently confident to alter it to that. JH (talk page) 19:41, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

To reply to myself, further digging turned up the article Baron Dacre, which shows that Thomas Lennard, the 15th Baron Dacre, was created the Earl of Sussex in 1674, three years before the entry in the list of cricketers. Based on that, I'll change his entry to Thomas Lennard, 1st Earl of Sussex. JH (talk page) 19:47, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the update. JH (talk page) 08:27, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

Good work, this, as I've said on John's page. --BlackJack | ^{talk page} 20:39, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

John deserves the credit, not me. --Jim Hardie (talk) 08:07, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

Alresford Cricket Club

BlackJack added the first 5 of the 6 References, as part of what seemed to be his standard set of references for all 18th century cricket articles. From their titles, it's not clear to me whether all of them would have anything to say about Alresford (1742-51 seems rather early, for instance). The only book that I actually referred to when creating the article was Arlott's. So I wonder if BlackJack's added references should be deleted, or at least moved to a Further Reading section? JH (talk page) 19:09, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

They should probably be deleted, though I haven't checked them. --BlackJack | ^{talk page} 20:38, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

Agreed. --Jim Hardie (talk) 08:07, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

Service award

I've given you your first service badge, keep up the good work! Mjroots (talk) 16:25, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

Keep at it, then you can have one like mine :-) Mjroots (talk) 20:43, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

18th century cricket

Hi. I'd like to point out that every single article about cricket up to 1787 was based on From Lads to Lord's; The History of Cricket: 1300 – 1787. Equally relevant to most of those articles is CricketArchive.

I've effectively granted permission to Wikipedia to use my site as a source on condition that the source is clearly acknowledged. But you've removed "From Lads to Lord's" as a source from several articles including Duke of Richmond that I've just been studying. Would you please put it back as an external source and not merely in one of your footnotes? The same applies to CricketArchive where that has a relevant page.

By the way, I don't see the point of footnotes unless they provide useful optional information or are used to qualify a direct quotation. Inline citations, as you call them, don't help the reader. I saw one article where you've literally got an A-Q for Ashley-Cooper in the references section. That's completely over the top.

If you want to reply, do so here. There's no point in jumping about from page to page. You're on my watchlist – so beware ;-)

Thanks. --BlackJack | ^{talk page} 20:25, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

I admit I have been wrong in removing external sources and further reading lists in many articles. If you check my contributions, you will see that I reinstated them for all the season articles but I suppose I have not been quite so diligent with some biographies. You are quite right and I will make amends. My apologies.

Nevertheless, I must defend my decision to use inline citations which are, in any case, a site standard per WP:CITE. I admit that it looks clumsy to have an A-Q for Ashley-Cooper but at least it is confined to one line. I have seen other articles where the same source, differentiated only by a page number, is repeated ad nauseum over umpteen or more lines.

Do please reconsider your decision to leave the site. I have studied all the cricket articles up to 1772 so far and they are marvellous. I would never have expected to find any coverage of early cricket on here but it is positively comprehensive!

I do hope you will rejoin the project. Very best regards. --Jim Hardie (talk) 20:56, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

I have gone through all the early cricket articles this morning and I think they all now link to FLTL and, where possible, to CA. Not all of the early cricketers have an entry in CA, of course. I daresay one or two have slipped past me but if you let me know of those when you spot them, I will correct them too. Best wishes. --Jim Hardie (talk) 08:07, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

Margaret of Anjou

Yes Margaret was an interesting lady, especially when you consider she commanded knights and soldiers on the battlefield. Alas, I have no biographies of Margaret so I wasn't aware of her association with Pierre de Bréze. The article needs major work, I hope I did a good job on the paragraph about the beginnings of the Wars of The Roses. I also previously had altered her birth year from 1429 to 1430. Seeing as her sister Yolande had been born 2 November 1428, Margaret could not have been born March 1429. Anyway, The Encyclopedia Britannica clearly states that Margaret of Anjou was born 23 March 1430. I also mentioned her founding of Queens College. By the way, I had a friend from Fermanagh. I have never visited that county though.Cheers.jeanne (talk) 06:17, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

Thank you, Jeanne. The article is looking much more complete now. I will try to do some more research during the next few days. Very best wishes. --Jim Hardie (talk) 08:07, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

You will have noticed I added a citation for the rumour that either the Duke of Somerset or Earl of Wiltshire fathered Prince Edward.I also read in "The Royal Consorts" by Anne Powers that Somerset had fathered Edward and Elizabeth Woodville as her lady-in-waiting had assisted the pair.No queen could commit adultery without the aid of a lady-in-waiting,hence, Anne Boleyn's obvious innocence.Cheersjeanne (talk) 11:42, 30 April 2008 (UTC).

Cricket barnstar

Cricket barnstar Jim Hardie is awarded this barnstar for his excellent work in improving our coverage of cricket history. He deserves particular recognition for his meticulous attention to detail. Well done. --BlackJack

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXVI (April 2008)

The April 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 01:11, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Cricket season reviews

Jim, I'm working through all the season reviews to add a list of "first mentions", which will become "debutants", in each (i.e., those players mentioned for the first time in a major cricket context during that season).

Anyway, I've been comparing your work on articles up to 1772 with those from 1773 that you haven't updated yet. I readily acknowledge that the articles you have worked on are much better, especially your version of the match summary table. I've decided to adopt your template going forward. Well done. --BlackJack | ^{talk page} 07:26, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Notability criteria

Jim, would a cricket club founded in 1796 be notable enough for an article, or is that too late? Mjroots (talk) 06:52, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXVII (May 2008)

The May 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:59, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXVIII (June 2008)

The June 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:07, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

Proposal for standard infobox for History of [country] templates

Hi there! You're a member of WikiProject History, so I'm just informing you about a proposal I've made about standardizing History of [country] templates (like Template:History of France). The discussion is located at the talk page for WikiProject History—your comments and criticism are welcome. Thank you. Mr. Absurd (talk) 05:08, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXIX (July 2008)

The July 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 01:39, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

Nominations for the Military history WikiProject coordinator election

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process is starting. We are aiming to elect nine coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on September 14!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:32, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXX (August 2008)

The August 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:22, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

Military history WikiProject coordinator election

The September 2008 Military history WikiProject coordinator election has begun. We will be selecting nine coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of fourteen candidates. Please vote here by September 30!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:24, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXI (September 2008)

The September 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:54, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

Cricket - most runs scored off a ball

Thought you might like this. I don't know if it's a reliable enough source to add to an article on early cricket though. Mjroots (talk) 05:39, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LVI, October 2010

Your Military history Newsletter Project News: Editors for the newsletter, GAN backlog reduction drive Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial: EyeSerene sums up our "Five years of military history"

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 23:03, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LVII, November 2010

Your Military History Newsletter Project News: From the editors, "Military Historian of the Year", New Incubator, Black Project Report Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial: bahamut guides us through "Nominating military biographies for deletion"

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 22:40, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject Dacia

Hi! From your edits, it looks like you might be interested in ancient Dacia. Would you like to join the WikiProject Dacia? It is a project aimed to better organize and improve the quality and accuracy of the articles related to these topics. We need help expanding and reviewing many articles, and we also need more images. Your input is welcomed! Thanks and best regards!

--Codrin.B (talk) 05:34, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LVIII, December 2010

Your military history newsletter – Volume LVIII, December 2010 From the editors • "Military Historian of the Year" • Discussions • The month's new featured and A-class content • Review awards Contest results • A-class medal recipients • bahamut teaches us proper usage of "Jargon and acronyms" To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here. BrownBot (talk) 21:04, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Volume LVIX, January 2011

Your Military history Newsletter Project News: From the editors Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial: EyeSerene discusses "Writing neutrally for Wikipedia"

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 16:00, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LX, February 2011

Your Military History Newsletter Project News: From the editors Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial: Ed talks about real-world collaborations and how you can help

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 22:00, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXI, March 2011

Your Military History Newsletter Project News: From the editors Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial: Dank helps you see what article writers want from reviewers

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 03:52, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXII, April 2011

Your Military History Newsletter Project News: From the editors Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial: Buggie111 discusses neutral point of view

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 22:47, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXIII, May 2011

Your Military History Newsletter Project News: From the editors – Contest results, A-class medal recipients Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Editorial: Hawkeye's thoughts on the article writing process

To begin or stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 22:51, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXIV, June 2011

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; medal recipients; contest results Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at Finland and Spitfires Op-ed: Fifelfoo and hunting for plagiarism

To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. BrownBot (talk) 23:15, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXV, July 2011

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; medal recipients; contest results Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at Zeebrugee and Afghanistan Op-ed: WereSpielChequers examines RfA

To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. BrownBot (talk) 22:20, 14 August 2011 (UTC)

Military Historian of the Year

Nominations for the "Military Historian of the Year" for 2011 are now open. If you would like to nominate an editor for this award, please do so here. Voting will open on 22 January and run for seven days. Thanks! On behalf of the coordinators, Nick-D (talk) and Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 23:26, 15 January 2012 (UTC) You were sent this message because you are a listed as a member of the Military history WikiProject.

History of cricket to 1725

I have Blackjack's talk page on my watchlist, so I noticed your message to him about this article. I believe that he's not visiting Wikipedia very often at present, so you may have to wait some time for a reply from him. As cricket history is an interest of mine, though I'm not an expert, I thought that I would put in my own two penn'orth. If the sources which the article references say that cricket probably originated in the Weald, then we clearly have to go with that. However I've always wondered what cricket historians have based this assertion on. We know that cricket was being played by boys in Guildford circa 1550, whereas the earliest definite reference to cricket in the area of the Weald (going by the article) seems to relate to "Weald and Upland" versus "Chalkhill" at Chevening sometime around 1610. It's notable that two other early references come from Wanborough and West Horsley, both places within five miles or so of Guildford. So it seems to me that one could make a reasonable case that the game might have originated in west Surrey rather than considerably further east. However living in Cranleigh, just 9 miles from Guildford, and having been born in Guildford, I could be a little biassed! JH (talk page) 20:54, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

I have found my copy of Start of Play written by David Underdown who allied his enthusiasm for cricket with his professional skills as a historian. His book is essentially about Hambledon but he goes back to basics and starts with the "prehistory". He is emphatic that we know nothing until Guildford circa 1550. But, in his view, cricket originated "among the peasantry" in "the forest counties of Surrey, Sussex and Kent". He only mentions the Weald in geographic terms which I will repeat: that it lay at the heart of these southeastern counties as "an ancient forest stretching across Kent and Sussex" while on either side of it were the chalk hills of the North and South Downs. All very accurately described (I am originally from the Tonbridge area, incidentally) and he goes on to present a historical overview of the region, albeit with no commitment beyond his view that the origin was somewhere in those three counties. As you say, the Guildford area is definitely a possible. Now, I agree with you that this site must reflect its sources because of the verification rules and it is therefore a case of which sources are used for verification. I have, after all, a copy of Underdown and so I should, if I chose to edit the article, cite that as my source. I will give this further thought. Kind regards. --Jim Hardie (talk) 21:07, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

Wikibreak

I've added the wikibreak template to my pages as I am going on holiday tomorrow for the rest of the Easter period and then a new study project will commence. I doubt if that will leave me much time for the internet other than any pure research so it looks as if this is goodbye for now. The project is scheduled for completion in October so maybe I'll be around again then. --Jim Hardie (talk) 09:41, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

My departure having been delayed by unwise interaction with an utterly stupid individual who has finally been banished from our midst, I shall now leave but with the intention of occasionally looking in. --Jim Hardie (talk) 19:45, 18 April 2012 (UTC)

Userspace protection

I've semiprotected your userpage indefinitely and this page for a week. Should you wish for either protection to be modified, leave a note on my talk page and I'll do my best to help you. Nyttend (talk) 12:49, 14 April 2012 (UTC)

History of cricket to 1725

Sorry I've taken so long to reply but I rarely use the site now. It looks like you've done the change anyway so fine. As for working with the idiot I've tried numerous times to accommodate him and even proposed to be his mentor last year but he immediately blew it with an unprovoked attack on TRM so what can I do? He is a waste of time and I see he has now earned a life ban so there we are. Don't worry about him. ----Jack | ^{talk page} 21:52, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

Military history coordinator election

The Military history WikiProject has started its 2012 project coordinator election process, where we will select a team of coordinators to organize the project over the coming year. If you would like to be considered as a candidate, please submit your nomination by 14 September. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact one of the current coordinators on their talk page. This message was delivered here because you are a member of the Military history WikiProject. – Military history coordinators (about the project • what coordinators do) 09:16, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject Military history coordinator election

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 22:15, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

WikiProject Military history coordinator election

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 29 September. Yours, Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 05:22, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:51, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Europe 10,000 Challenge invite

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 09:13, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

User group for Military Historians

Greetings,

"Military history" is one of the most important subjects when speak of sum of all human knowledge. To support contributors interested in the area over various language Wikipedias, we intend to form a user group. It also provides a platform to share the best practices between military historians, and various military related projects on Wikipedias. An initial discussion was has been done between the coordinators and members of WikiProject Military History on English Wikipedia. Now this discussion has been taken to Meta-Wiki. Contributors intrested in the area of military history are requested to share their feedback and give suggestions at Talk:Discussion to incubate a user group for Wikipedia Military Historians.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:30, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive

Hey y'all, the April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive begins at 00:01 UTC on April 1, 2021 and runs through 23:59 UTC on April 31, 2021. Points can be earned through reviewing articles on the AutoCheck report, reviewing articles listed at WP:MILHIST/ASSESS, reviewing MILHIST-tagged articles at WP:GAN or WP:FAC, and reviewing articles submitted at WP:MILHIST/ACR. Service awards and barnstars are given for set points thresholds, and the top three finishers will receive further awards. To participate, sign up at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Military_History/April 2021 Reviewing Drive#Participants and create a worklist at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/April 2021 Reviewing Drive/Worklists (examples are given). Further details can be found at the drive page. Questions can be asked at the drive talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:21, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Reynell Cotton for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Reynell Cotton is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reynell Cotton until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Blue Square Thing (talk) 20:32, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

You have been pruned from a list

Hi Jim Hardie! You're receiving this notification because you were previously listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject History/Outreach/Participants, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over 6 months.

Because of your inactivity, you have been removed from the list. If you would like to resubscribe, you can do so at any time by visiting Wikipedia:WikiProject History/Outreach/Participants.

Thank you! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:06, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of W. Epps

The article W. Epps has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTCRIT #5 - sourced only to a 19th century book that is part of a series consisting primarily of match statistics - see 9th Edition for an example

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 26 May 2022 (UTC)