User talk:ESkog/Archive21

Index of Talk Page archives 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 A B C D E F 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 1A 1B 1C 1D 1E 1F May 19-December 22, 2010 - December 23, 2010 - November 10, 2011 - December 8, 2011 - October 8, 2012 - October 18, 2012 - May 27, 2013 - May 30, 2013 - March 26, 2014 - January 29, 2015 - March 15, 2017

Honestly?

I pity you sir. Hopefully some day you will find yourself a life.

- A concerned friend. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.231.130.24 (talk) 02:42, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

Agreed, entirely. I hope someday you are able to escape your sad, empty existence. Suicide?

- Another concerned friend--134.71.214.15 (talk) 21:55, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

Karenani17

FYI: I have reported the user to AIV as they re-revered the AFD notice off the article (Deposits in Armenian banks) after the L4 warning. Hasteur (talk) 18:07, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

pissed off

But Wikipedia will be pissed off at me and block me forever. --''Polobob'' (talk) 22:55, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

re: links on isuzu related pages

Fine, remove links to isuzone.net and stormowners.com.

If these other car clubs do not belong on wikipedia, then neither do isuzone.net and stormowners.com. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.154.35.7 (talk) 18:09, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

Huggle2

Why don't you try Huggle2? WAYNESLAM 23:30, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

Banning for writing Original Research?

Hello, ESkog. A fast question: Do administrators ban people for only one instance of publishing Original Research in Wikipedia? In other word, if I ever become one, should I do so? Thanks, Fleet Command (talk) 19:55, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

Thanks. Now, in that regard, what do you think of this edit? Is it addition of Original Research or just vandalism? Fleet Command (talk) 08:56, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

Oh, that I'm completely certain of; I was merely asking whether this type of disruptive editing is Original Research. But I believe I got my answer. (You stated that it is subtle WP:SPAM.) Thank you. See you around. Fleet Command (talk) 20:25, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

image permissions

Permissions for image copyrights have been granted by the holders and are now pending

Fer1984 (talk) 15:43, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

Problem with "What links here"

Hello, ESkog. Looks like no one knows why, so I though I'd ask you. Special:WhatLinksHere/Offline reader is supposed to give me a list of articles that link to Offline reader but most of them don't link there, as far I can tell. Any idea what's wrong? Fleet Command (talk) 12:58, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

Well, as far as I can tell, right now, it is working properly!

But when I wrote to you, it was showing items like Galeon and Internet Explorer 9 which all failed the following test: I pressed Edit button in the article, pressed CTRL+F on my keyboard and searched [[Offline re, [[Offline mai or [[Offline br. These searches never yielded anything.

But it is resolved now, though I'm curious: When you received my call, did you run any certain script or administrative tool to see what's wrong? Maybe that has fixed it...

Thanks anyway. Fleet Command (talk) 21:48, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for the reverts on my talk page. :) Wikipelli ^Talk 22:38, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

WTF?

Why'd you remove my edit to the FPE page? Federal Pacific breakers are notorious for burning houses down. 70.104.203.168 (talk) 20:17, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

Source validation: U.S. High Schools

Hello, ESkog. I have this unreferenced assertion that say U.S. high schools are leaning towards segregation of genders, i.e. being a male-only or female-only school. I will not have such a thing without source in Wikipedia, but given the reputation of the contributor, I thought checking with you wouldn't hurt. Do you think this assertion is genuine? Fleet Command (talk) 20:01, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

"I have no doubt that your source is credible", you said! Man, I said "I have this unreferenced assertion...". I'm deleting the assertion. Peace. Fleet Command (talk) 21:36, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

A penny for your thoughts

Hello! I dropped by because I would like to ask a favor of you to give me a bit of help on something. I am currently in the process of doing a Good Article Nomination Review for White Horse (song), and this is my first time reviewing an article with a non-fair use image with the rationale for those. I looked up the criteria for these rationales but am still a little fuzzy. Noticing you examples page for appropriate non-fair use rationales I was wondering if you could look at this images rationale:

File:Taylor Swift in White Horse music video.jpg

and help me identify whether or not this is an appropriate rationale for a image on a Good Article? It seems to answer what is needed but surely is not as detailed as it could be. Is this a problem? Any help you can provide is appreciated. •Felix• ^T 20:02, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

Thanks!! Your comments were most helpful. •Felix• ^T 21:32, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

Interesting

It will be interesting to see you prove that the customer of the Ministry of Sound is still alive. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.30.71.244 (talk) 14:47, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

A Barnstar for you!

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		I am slow today you have beat me to about 10 reverts. Keep up the good work! Golgofrinchian (talk) 14:57, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

Good Timing on that Block

I skipped right to a final warning on vandalism for the user S****er 23 due to the nature of his vandalism and his name at the same time as you decided to block him :) Ryan Vesey (talk) 20:57, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

You cancel the reference...

Ciao ESkog, I'm italian new user of wikipedia and because I'm really passionate of opera I decide to add link in the page But yiu removed (http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/David_Guido_Pietroni). No problem I'll study better guideline. I added reference for remove this wikipedia banner:

This article uses bare URLs or very simple external links in its references. Such references are threatened by link rot. Please use proper citations containing each referenced work's title, author, publisher, date, and source, so that the article remains verifiable in the future. Several templates are available for formatting. A tool may be available to help. (February 2011)

Can you help me please to understand how fix it?

Thanks and forgive my english.

Marzia Verona —Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.54.254.131 (talk) 21:45, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

Spelling

Hi, can you explain this edit please? Guoguo12--Talk--  20:59, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

Hello. You have a new message at User_talk:Guoguo12#Re:_spelling's talk page.

Okay, you're right. However, I do have to point out that Huggle is for vandalism only. Spelling errors should be undone manually. Cheers! Guoguo12--Talk--  21:08, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

Apologies

Dear Sir, i apologise for the comments that have appeared on wikipedia this evening... i am a student who lives in residence with 3 other males, i left my laptop unlocked and they took advantage of my lapse. I use this site regularly and would hate to think that i could be blocked from using it. Apologies for the inconvience caused, please sir, have a good day —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.29.169.184 (talk) 21:22, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

If I came back...

Dear ESkog, it's been a long time. What's new for your life?

If I came back, would you do anything differently? Sincerely, --The Former Shultz (talk) 10:13, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

No response in nearly a month. Yep, you probably hate me to death now. A year from now at this rate, you might hate me at much as Hitler hated the Semites. Oh well. --The Former Shultz (talk) 02:29, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

You're a moron

Yes, it's an ad hominem attack. I edited a perfectly correct sentence and it's immediately edited??? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.175.229.227 (talk) 20:45, 10 May 2011 (UTC)

Deleted Cover Photo

Hi, I uploaded a rental market report picture for the "Rental Market Report" page; however, you deleted it. I am just wondering what is wrong with the picture to be taken off the site. Please reply. Thank you.

Dlee.tregny (talk) 17:49, 12 May 2011 (UTC)Dlee.tregny

Vandalism

Looks like you're too darn quick tonight, about 3 times I've reverted and you've beat me to it ;) Happy editing! Zarcadia (talk) 17:21, 13 May 2011 (UTC)

Trolli Page

Dear ESkog,

I'm having trouble with this whole copyright infringment policy surrounding Trolli's page.

Is there anywhere we could talk (e.g. e-mail) more comfortably than here for I have a few questions.

The various images of mine that you have deleted all belong to the company I am working for: Some were taken by people in the company, some were made by my colleagues and some we're taken over 40 years ago.

Could you please explain the process I need to undergo in order to keep the page up with all of it's content.

Furthermore, the person who uploaded this page nearly a year ago no longer works here and did not exaclty understand how Wikipedia works, very much like me.

Any help would be very welcome.

Also, the work day is over so until 09.00 (GMT +1) tomorrow, I cannot make any changes, so please leave the content up.

Best regards, Greg

17.05.2011

Gregorymed (talk) 15:09, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

List of nutrition guides

Hello, I appreciate your good-faith edits to List of nutrition guides in the interest of following the rules on non-free images. But I believe Wikipedia provides guidance for using non-free images in lists, rather than an outright ban on them, and I've started a discussion on the article's talk page on how to follow those guidelines. Care to take a look? 76.105.176.44 (talk) 04:52, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

Rollback

Isn't this edit worth an edit summary? Marcus Qwertyus 20:58, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

Book covers in bibliographies

Hi. I have accepted your revert at Terence Reese bibliography for the time being but please see my response there. Newwhist (talk) 20:56, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

Re: deleted image

Hello, I'm Michelle. It is first time that I am writing to you. You deleted my picture of Mayan king Yich'aak B'alam yesterday. This is a photo of computer screen. With the fair use, what license should I took for the picture?--Mychele (talk) 08:02, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

I am sorry, it was my mistake. When I was uploading this picture of captive king, I didn't know that there is another picture of him on Wikimedia - Image. So, you can remove my picture - the one that I upload. I am sorry if I took too much of your time.--Michelle

New to Wiki

Thank you for your comments regarding the photos I uploaded. I understand the guidelines, but am still new to properly tagging items, particularly these promotional photos. I have made the edits you recommended, can you look at them and perhaps offer more advice? Thank you!Megan Canary (talk) 18:06, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

"Edit War"

There is no edit war. Someone wasnt reading an article i mentioned in an edit clear enough that was already in the section as a source. I posted on his talk page and quoted the line on the page that i got the information from. If they still deny the truthfullness, then thats their problem not mine. U might want to look at what i posted on the talk page of the article before you threaten me with a ban.--Rockchalk717 (talk) 00:03, 14 August 2011 (UTC)

User:Maxi1992

Despite your warning, the user is still uploading images from the internet that don't belong to him to player articles. Please do something about it because it will take a lot of work to correct his work. Thanks.TonyStarks (talk) 17:55, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

On the possibly unfree file: Submersible_1.jpg

Wikipedia:Possibly_unfree_files/2011_September_15#File:Submersible_1.jpg

Please read my follow-up comment there. It contains proof that that picture was taken by the US Navy. Basically the photo is a still from a film taken by the US Navy, and you can download the film from the link in my comment there (it is an 84.5 mb avi file showing the whole film), and you can see the picture in its footage. If you want to investigate and re-evaluate your statement there, I will be glad to provide any further assistance. Eddo36 (talk) 01:12, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

Shabnur

Could you please check this article. I reverted the user's contributions because they apparently violated copyright, but I'm not sure if this is a copy>paste or not (on top of that, Huggle hicupped on me while I was working, obviously). Calabe1992 (talk) 14:56, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

Non-free image issues

Greetings. As per the tags added to this image and this image which I recently uploaded, I tried checking Commons and Flickr for freely licenced versions without any luck. They're pretty obscure people in the grand scheme of things, so I don't think it's particularly easy to come across any freebies. Granted, there's the option of contacting various authors on Flickr in an attempt to get them to allow me to use one or more of their images on Wikipedia, but I don't really have the patience to go around contacting a bunch of people. I could either end up waiting a long time, or not get any responses nor permission. Plus, I wouldn't be familiar with how to subsequently credit them and ensure the correct licencing tag.

If you could suggest to me what I could do to make my screenshots passable rather than them being summarily deleted, I would appreciate it. The two articles in question have been without proper infobox images for years and, since I'm actively involved in maintaining their bio pages, I figured I'd just try to be proactive. Also, I've noticed a few screenshots elsewhere which are obviously taken from TV broadcasts, but have somehow managed to circumvent the non-free licence by means of false information. Here is an image, for example, which looks very much like a crude photograph of a TV broadcast, but the author seems to have got away with it by stating that it is his own work. If he can get away with it, in all fairness, what are my chances? Mac Dreamstate (talk) 16:20, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

In which case, I guess I don't have a leg to stand on.. No worries. It's a shame they'll get deleted, but that's at the articles' expense, not mine. If my only option is to go around pleading for permission from Flickr users, I'll leave it be. Maybe in some years' time Wikipedia will evolve into something less draconian when it comes to the encyclopaedic use of images. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 17:17, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

Hello, ESkog. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. DBaK (talk) 14:03, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

Pics

Hi - yes, thank you, that is very much what I had in mind - it's the extra bit of outreach and the offer of help that I think is absolutely crucial. Sure, we can't make the editor read it and comply, but it's great that you've offered the help. And if it did then all go a bit pear-shaped in the kind of way that I was worrying about, then having done this I think makes it much more likely that we can still come up smelling of roses! Thanks again and best wishes DBaK (talk) 22:30, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

Created a new Wiki and need your help and advice

Hi,

Thanks a ton for your feedback. Much appreciated. Link: http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/User:Varunr/Level10_Comics Varunr (talk) 04:02, 14 October 2011 (UTC)

Anish Kapoor page images

Hi, I am new to all this so fingers crossed I am writing to you were I should be. I have recently uploaded a number of images of Anish Kapoor portraits and works which were then deleted. I have permission to upload low res files of these from his studio. Should I in future just state this in the image description box? Thanks AkalethiaAkalethia (talk) 13:55, 16 October 2011 (UTC)

Why the change?

I own this picture he is my relative I took it with my fujifilm camera at my parents - I dont get it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stefan197 (talk • contribs) 19:17, 10 November 2011‎

Ownwrship?

I own the picture Stefan197 (talk) 19:27, 10 November 2011 (UTC)