User talk:Clyde Jimpson of the Arkansas String Beans/Archive 1

Archive 1

Archive 2

Welcome!

Welcome!

Hello, Gandalf the Groovy, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Your first article
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
• Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
• and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Miniapolis 15:13, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

YO

Testing testing 123Gandalf the Groovy (talk) 18:47, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

Gandalf the Groovy, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Gandalf the Groovy! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Jtmorgan (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:02, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
347		DCeased (talk)	Add sources
146		Racism in Germany (talk)	Add sources
76		Barua (Bangladesh) (talk)	Add sources
38		Providence Christian Academy (Murfreesboro, Tennessee) (talk)	Add sources
130		Anti-Jewish legislation in pre-war Nazi Germany (talk)	Add sources
22		Spanish Synagogue (Prague) (talk)	Add sources
34		Federal budget of Germany (talk)	Cleanup
2,855		Anupamaa (talk)	Cleanup
115		FIDIC (talk)	Cleanup
14		Liechtenstein Homeland Service (talk)	Expand
214		Görlitz (talk)	Expand
3		1935 Cuba hurricane (talk)	Expand
1,327		Sharpe (TV series) (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
21		Maghen Abraham Synagogue (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
77		Rosenstrasse protest (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
655		Criticism of democracy (talk)	Merge
2,219		Slaughterhouse-Five (talk)	Merge
100		World Disarmament Conference (talk)	Merge
19		Farmacina Ltd (talk)	Wikify
16		Leipzig Book Fair (talk)	Wikify
11		1810s Atlantic hurricane seasons (talk)	Wikify
8		Chemnitz-Kaßberg (talk)	Orphan
3		Elena Alexandrina Bednarik (talk)	Orphan
1		Angelo Paolanti (talk)	Orphan
173		Semantic Scholar (talk)	Stub
4		New Synagogue (Darmstadt) (talk)	Stub
16		Japanisches Palais (talk)	Stub
3		New Synagogue (Düsseldorf) (talk)	Stub
5		Hollandse Synagoge (talk)	Stub
64		Secession Building (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:31, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

Removing tags

Although Wretchskull mistook your edits of List of Cayman Islands hurricanes for vandalism, they were right about not removing tags unless they're inappropriate or you've addressed (or plan to address) the issue on the tag. I changed the {{More citations needed}} tag to {{unreferenced}}, since the article is completely unsourced. There are two "See also" sections, which I'll combine. Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/How to and Wikipedia:Basic copyediting are helpful links. Have fun and all the best, Miniapolis 15:22, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

Wow. Please don't do large reverts until you have more experience; the "good" version of the page was well-sourced, which I'm glad Fuhghettaboutit noticed. They also combined those two see-also sections. Stay well and all the best, Miniapolis 15:30, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

My apologys I copy and pasted my writing back into the page which resulted in removed citiations sorry. That was my mistake as I am still learning the ropes Gandalf the GroovyGandalf the Groovy (talk) 16:02, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

(e/c) Hey Gandalf the Groovy. Let me clarify a bit regarding the revert and other issues Miniapolis refers to above. After you completed your copyedit, you were reverted. You then attempted to revert the reversion, but if you look at the state of the page as of that revision by you (here), you did not properly revert at all but left the page at some version with no citations whatsoever. It doesn't really matter how you ended up doing the reversion wrong, so long as you understand how to do it properly in the future. Below I will describe a manual revert. Note that the undo button is useful but extremely limited, whereas a manual revert can be used to revert a page to any version in its entire history.

1. Go to a page's history;
2. click on the date of a revision you wish to revert to;
3. Click edit this page at the top; and
4. Save the page (yep, that's it).

Anyway, after you left it in that poor state, without any citations, you also left it with the {{copyedit}} tag placed back, which you had previously removed during your copyedit (as instructed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/Backlog elimination drives/January 2021#Totals). Removing that template places the article back in celanup categories for articles tagged as needing copyediting. That likely is the origin of your current Teahouse post asking how you remove the article from the "list" of articles needing copyediting.

However, this raises one more issue. In your copyedit, you not only removed the copyedit template from the article, but also {{More citations}}. That was not warranted at all as the article is about 70% unsourced (and I have returned it). Please be careful not to remove that important flag on an article, as sourcing is the lifeblood of proper content.

Indeed, I'd note that I was in the midst of composing a response to your question at the Teahouse, saying something to the effect that I was going to revert your entire copyedit, because you removed all the citations, and explaining that "an article that has had its grammar/spelling etc. fixed but that has citations, is far superior to that same content written better but without the citations" and so forth (but then figured out that you hadn't done so intentionally, but had just bungled the revert). Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 16:12, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

January 2021 GOCE Drive bling

		The Cleanup Barnstar
		This barnstar is awarded to Gandalf the Groovy for copy edits totaling over 12,000 words (including bonus and rollover words) during the GOCE January 2021 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Reidgreg (talk) 18:58, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Gandalf the Groovy! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Wikipedia article in another language, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Clyde Jimpson of the Arkansas String Beans/Archive 1. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by βӪᑸᙥӴ • Talk • Contribs 17:08, 7 March 2021 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).

Your thread has been archived

Hi Gandalf the Groovy! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Red Links, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Gandalf the Groovy! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Article draft, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

A cookie for you!

free cookie for the funny name and for joining wikiproject military history EpicPlayer12235 (talk) 17:18, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Gandalf the Groovy! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Article Draft Notability, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Gandalf the Groovy! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Date, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Gandalf the Groovy! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Answering questions, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:05, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Gandalf the Groovy! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Stubs, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Gandalf the Groovy! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, sources, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Gandalf the Groovy! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Journal Citations, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Gandalf the Groovy! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Edit Count, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alexander Hunter (novelist) (March 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Alexander Hunter (novelist) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Alexander Hunter (novelist), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 21:25, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

== Your submission at Articles for creation: Alexander Hunter (novelist) has been accepted ==

Alexander Hunter (novelist), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 20:14, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

You asked me on my talk p. for help in improving sources:

The basics are author, title, and publisher, and ISBN or OCLC number, all of which are easy to find in WP:Worldcat. For some of them you sees to have also cited them as references. In our citation style, you do not have to include these in a bibliography section at all if you've cited them correctly in the references. The Bibliography section is normally used for a list of more general or related books, and some of those listed seem quite appropriate. I see some of the references aalso are incomplete , For magazine articles, you should have the title of the article as well as the author. There's a more important problem. The list of confederate veterans on the internet is not really an adequate source for birth and death dates. It should be possible to find better, including an obituary in a local newspaper. For help in finding such sources, the best way at this time is to call your local library.

The most difficult part of writing articles in WP is to get the references done properly. The best place to start is at WP:REFBEGIN.Don't worry too much about formatting , which people and some semi-automatic programs (we call them bots) will fix for you, but try to get all the information. The key information if at all possible is the ISBN --it's the link to everything else.

And something else I noticed: the article on his book is not in good condition. What it needs is references to substantial reviews in third-party published independent reliable sources. It should be possible to find them. Again, ask a librarian--you can tell them its for a WP article you're writing. (I'm a retired librarian myself. Note the retired.) DGG ( talk ) 21:04, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive

Hey y'all, the April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive begins at 00:01 UTC on April 1, 2021 and runs through 23:59 UTC on April 31, 2021. Points can be earned through reviewing articles on the AutoCheck report, reviewing articles listed at WP:MILHIST/ASSESS, reviewing MILHIST-tagged articles at WP:GAN or WP:FAC, and reviewing articles submitted at WP:MILHIST/ACR. Service awards and barnstars are given for set points thresholds, and the top three finishers will receive further awards. To participate, sign up at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Military_History/April 2021 Reviewing Drive#Participants and create a worklist at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/April 2021 Reviewing Drive/Worklists (examples are given). Further details can be found at the drive page. Questions can be asked at the drive talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:24, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

March drive bling

		The Minor Barnstar
		This barnstar is awarded to Gandalf the Groovy for copy edits totaling between 1 and 3,999 words (including bonus and rollover words) during the GOCE March 2021 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Miniapolis 21:14, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

Skipping AfC

Be aware that by skipping AfC, new articles are scrutinized at Wikipedia:New pages patrol, which can result in accepting, kicked back to draft, BLPPROD, PROD, Speedy deletion or AfD. David notMD (talk) 19:41, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Samuel Anderson (surveyor) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Samuel Anderson (surveyor). Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 23:19, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Samuel Anderson (surveyor) has been accepted

Samuel Anderson (surveyor), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Paul W (talk) 13:48, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lewis Cass Hunt has been accepted

Lewis Cass Hunt, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 14:02, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: William Wright (Medal of Honor recipient) has been accepted

William Wright (Medal of Honor recipient), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

CommanderWaterford (talk) 10:20, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jacob F. Yeager has been accepted

Jacob F. Yeager, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 20:12, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Evan M. Woodward has been accepted

Evan M. Woodward, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

TheWikiholic (talk) 03:26, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: William J. Wray has been accepted

William J. Wray, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

TheWikiholic (talk) 03:40, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Albert D. Wright has been accepted

Albert D. Wright, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

TheWikiholic (talk) 03:42, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Robert Wright (Medal of Honor) has been accepted

Robert Wright (Medal of Honor), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

TheWikiholic (talk) 04:17, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Samuel Wright (Medal of Honor) has been accepted

Samuel Wright (Medal of Honor), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Cerebellum (talk) 10:59, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
4		Thomas Anderson (Medal of Honor) (talk)	Add sources
6		Johnny's Blues: A Tribute to Johnny Cash (talk)	Add sources
57		IEEE Medal of Honor (talk)	Add sources
98		NASA Distinguished Service Medal (talk)	Add sources
9		Dressed in Black: A Tribute to Johnny Cash (talk)	Add sources
6		48th Pennsylvania Infantry Regiment (talk)	Add sources
164		Bigg Boss Kannada (season 2) (talk)	Cleanup
269		Phenylpiracetam (talk)	Cleanup
215		Udaya TV (talk)	Cleanup
217		Phenmetrazine (talk)	Expand
3,372		Medal of Honor (talk)	Expand
45		National Library of Latvia (talk)	Expand
211		The Man Comes Around (song) (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
3		Shah Latif and his message (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
22		Narcotics in Bolivia (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
69		Α-PHiP (talk)	Merge
269		Optical rotation (talk)	Merge
19		Illegal drug trade in Bolivia (talk)	Merge
105		Val Lewton (talk)	Wikify
691		Chagos Archipelago (talk)	Wikify
37		News18 Kerala (talk)	Wikify
2		Jean Marguerite Bachelier (talk)	Orphan
3		AgroChem, Inc. (talk)	Orphan
2		Abdullah Mahmoud al-Khalidi (talk)	Orphan
9		All Aboard: A Tribute to Johnny Cash (talk)	Stub
9		Richard Enderlin (talk)	Stub
9		Thomas R. Hawkins (talk)	Stub
7		Coca Museum (talk)	Stub
12		Kindred Spirits: A Tribute to the Songs of Johnny Cash (talk)	Stub
7		Georgios Giakoumakis (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 16:01, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Antarctica in World War II has been accepted

Antarctica in World War II, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

(t · c) buidhe 08:23, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Moses Veale has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Moses Veale. Thanks! KylieTastic (talk) 15:13, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Moses Veale (May 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Moses Veale and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Moses Veale, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 15:17, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Moses Veale has been accepted

Moses Veale, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

KylieTastic (talk) 14:11, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

American Civil War Medal of Honor winners

Hey there, I noticed recently the new articles you've been creating in the WikiProject US redlink backlog and I just wanted say how nice it is to have someone else clearing it with me. I'm currently working on Q-S, and if you need anyone to look over something, feel free to message me on my talk page. Shotgunscoop (talk) 17:36, 27 May 2021 (UTC)

May drive bling

		The Modest Barnstar
		This barnstar is awarded to Gandalf the Groovy for copy edits totaling over 4,000 words (including bonus and rollover words) during the GOCE May 2021 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Miniapolis 00:26, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Contay British Commonwealth War Graves Commission Cemetery has been accepted

Contay British Commonwealth War Graves Commission Cemetery, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

AntanO 01:46, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:58, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nomination period closing soon

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are still open, but not for long. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! No further nominations will be accepted after that time. Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:42, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

WikiProject Military history coordinator election voting has commenced

Hey y'all, voting for the 2021 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2021. Voting will be conducted at the 2021 tranche page itself. Appropriate questions for the candidates can also be asked. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:39, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election voting period closing soon

Hey y'all, voting for the 2021 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche will be closing soon. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2021. Voting will be conducted at the 2021 tranche page itself. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:32, 26 September 2021 (UTC)