User talk:Bgwhite/Archive 5

Archive 1

←

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

Archive 6

Archive 7

→

Archive 10

Improper reverting of a disambiguation

You have reverted the following hatnote in the page Daniel Lazard:

Not to be confused with Michel Lazard, another French mathematician after whom are named Lazard rings.

Your summary for that edit was: Remove hatnote. Goes against MOS guidlines in this case. Which MOS guideline is against this hatnote? WP:HN does not mention such a case, where a people is ambiguously cited in an article title. In any case, such a disambiguation is strongly needed to avoid that a user who want to know more about the introducer of Lazard rings to read the wrong page. This confusion between the two mathematician called Lazard is very frequent. I have even encounter it several times by former students on one of them. What else do you propose for this disambiguation? D.Lazard (talk) 12:45, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

First off, you are editing your own page. I suggest you do no edit your page anymore. I don't think you have done anything wrong. In fact, I think you have done everything right by being up front about it and asking a question here when there is a "dispute". I have nothing but high praises for what you have done. It is just that it is best to stay away from the "appearance of evil".

Michel Lazard doesn't have an article. It appears he should have one. Could you write one up?

I'm objecting to the use of Lazard rings. in the hatnote... There isn't enough to mix things up. However, you are right, there does appear to be confusion about you and Michel. There should be something said about that at the top. Bgwhite (talk) 21:27, 2 January 2012 (UTC)l

A one year old Archdeacon!

At my age (51) the policeman really do start to look younger, but I'm afraid my error with Malcolm Leslie Lesiter was just incompetence. Looking at the date I could plead over indulgence the night before; but as usual Dad's Taxi was open for business http://www.halfmoonbay.co.uk/assets/product/340/340/1/MGTA2.jpg and I never had a drop! All the best for 2012- here's to error free editing
Bashereyre (talk) 20:52, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

If you didn't have a drop, what did you smoke? :). I also caught another Archdeacon of yours in which you called him Lesiter. You must have been smoking some good stuff. Atleast you had a good time. I was with my wife, therefore I was miserable... another loooong year with her. Bgwhite (talk) 21:01, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Ha, ha. My last smoke was on Remembrance Sunday 2006. But do you know, if I could be sure the world really was going to end on 21 December 2012 I would be back on my two packs of Marlboro Reds a day quicker than the wife could say “They’re really not very good for you, darling”.

Bashereyre (talk) 22:52, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Irum-upnen-byungsa

It seems iffy to me too. It would of been better if there was a better source to find more about that person. A real name would make it easier to find. Jae ₩on (Deposit) 15:16, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

ZDoggMD

Hi, you removed several references in the "History" section, leaving a note that the article did not mention what was written, however this is not true. The History section comes entirely from the online interview at TechCrunch, as was referenced. Please can you restore them. Also you messed up some of the ref tags in the intro paragraph.Richard ruffian (talk) 03:40, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

First off, new talk sections go at the bottom of most people's talk pages.

I removed the techcrunch reference because none of the things that were being referenced in the WikiPedia article by techcruch were to be found in the techcrunch article. If you are referring to the techcrunch interview, interviews are deemed unreliable for most things. For example, the interview saying he got his start because of his best friend, the CEO of Zappos, cannot be used as this is a claim about third party. This has to be documented by a reliable source. Please see WP:SOURCES.

I'm not sure what you mean by "you messed up some of the ref tags in the intro paragraph". I never changed formatting of any reference as they were and still are messed up. I only removed unreliable references. Bgwhite (talk) 06:23, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

Well WP:SOURCES backs up the use of my interview completely: "Base articles on reliable, third-party, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. Source material must have been published (made available to the public in some form);" [TechCruch is all of these things and the interview is published]

"Electronic media may also be used, subject to the same criteria."

(TechCruch interview is "Electronic media") - WP:Sources says nothing about not using interviews.

Also you removed a reference to med blogs, one of the most respected online medical communities where authors are by invitation only, this counts (also from WP:Sources) as a reliable source: "Several newspapers host columns they call blogs. These are acceptable as sources if the writers are professionals and the blog is subject to the newspaper's full editorial control."

Please revert.

Richard ruffian (talk) 16:15, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

Not all electronic media are the same. A newspaper article on the web and a blog are both "electronic media", but are different creatures.

A straight up interview by a subject talking about themselves is self-published regardless of the medium. For example, 60 Minutes does an interview with a subject at the beginning. 60 Minutes follows up the interview showing all the lies. Is the interview a reliable source? No. You cannot use a self published source that involves claims about a third party. The interview was used to reference that CEO of Zappos is a best friend and prodded him to do the videos. This is claims about a third party.

The med blog says it got information from another source. I also removed the med blog because it was only being used as a reference for his name. You do not need a reference to verify somebody's name unless the name maybe of doubt. A movie star who legal changed their name, but says they never did comes to mind. Bgwhite (talk) 21:01, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

DEFAULTSORT

Thanks for picking me up on that, I was in a hurry. :) In ictu oculi (talk) 13:28, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

Greg Kats

Thanks for your comments. I have removed the contents of the usepage and I will work on adding citations in the work section.

I believe that the congressional testimony is notable as it relates directly to controversial political issues including the Solyndra loan controversy and an ongoing, high level US Federal investigation that has become an issue for candidates in the 2012 United States Presidental Election.

I look forward to working with you to improve this article Aseal (talk) 12:44, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

Your neutral point of view comments are welcome. Aseal (talk) 14:00, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

Thanks

For fixing Charles W. Henderson's template.--Mike - Μολὼν λαβέ 06:39, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

Great find!

That is really useful. I immediately looked for DRC, and then Sudan, and did not find either. But no problem. Kenya gives Bantu and Nilotic rules and Algeria gives Arabic rules. So this is a breakthrough. Too bad it is not in more accessible format, but still, it is way better than nothing. It should be referenced in the WP guideline on name sequence. I can see no reason why WP would adopt any other standard. Maybe WP could give a simplified version for each language group... Aymatth2 (talk) 14:50, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

I would say the subject deserves a WP:something guideline page of its own, and am sure you would get no objections from anyone and a lot of support if you just went ahead and created one. Maybe sort of announce your intention on Wikipedia talk:Categorization of people. My guess is that a) the rules are mostly language-specific, not country-specific, and b) there is a relatively small number of rule sets, with a given rule set applying to several languages. No need to repeat it for each language or country, but maybe a cross-reference would be useful.

For example, for Bantu-group languages (many languages, several countries), the general rule is something like:

• European first names are not included in the sort
• If the name contains a hyphenated pair "wa-xxx" that starts with "wa-", the main sort key is WA-XXX, followed by any words after wa-xxx, followed by the words before wa-xxx
• If the name contains an unhyphenated "wa", the main sort key is XXX, where xxx is the word that follows "wa", followed by any words after xxx, followed by the words before wa
• Otherwise, the main sort key is the last word, followed by the other words in the sequence given.

It would take a fair amount of work to spell out all the rules, but would be extremely useful. I don't know what the protocols are for this sort of thing, an admin should advise, but wonder if it would be worth approaching IFLA and asking them whether they would waive copyright? Aymatth2 (talk) 20:48, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

G.K. Sanghar has been re-edited following your Advice to Prevent Deletion

Hi Bgwhite,

Firstly, thank you for your considerate feedback. Yes, there was quite a bit to work on and I have made the changes and there are a couple of things I need to clarify too.

After reading your comments and going through the article, I realized how commercial and biased the article had seemed. As a result, I have tried remove whatever advertising or promotional language use.

Secondly, thanks for the re-direct for the matter of the fact that she is at times referred to as GK or Gurpreet Kaur, which make up the initials G.K. Having regarded that, the article on the India Se website cites her name as Gurpreet Sanghar. Please do bear in mind that her articles are featured in publications that are not showcased online as per normal unlike the scanned versions found on fan websites, which are totally inappropriate. Given how exclusive India Se is, readers have to subscribe to the magazine in order to read the full story. That is why, you can only see the the few paragraphs of the story on the website. Most of the time books and films are easily attributed as compared to articles. However, I do have her original articles in pdf. format for verification but I suppose I cannot upload them? Also all of her TV shows are accredited and credible, including 'Pure Allure' and can be found on her website directly under the heading 'Media Gallery.' But how do I reference the individual TV show clips online for verification?

Next, for the music album, 'Illamai Jolly Jolly', I have added more information about the production and the cause of the album, which is essential. This time, I have referenced that bit with the same article once removed as it is now very relevant to the production of the album. GK had hosted the press launch too, which is available on her website, so these are verified pieces of work. However, her shows are only shown on television or cable, and are not available online, except for the 'My First Million' trailer, which is accessible online. Zee TV and MediaCorp are reputable channels and their works are bound to exclusivity and copyright. You will realize this when you Google up Singaporean TV personalities online and their shows are hard to find online....in Singapore, please bear that we only have one media broadcast centre, MediaCorp unlike other countries which have several stations, hence the limited viewing.

I have removed the IWG Fashion Calendar that GK was a part of as there are no pictures available online, except for a fan-created facebook page. The reason being that the calender is currently being sold for 2012. Please do regard that the calendar was launched by India Se's editor and GK was featured in magazine that she wrote for. Then again, I excluded that portion as it may lead to partiality when that it not the case. India Se is proud NRI magazine that caters to reporting on the significant issues concerning South Asian Diasporas around the world and GK was essentially featured.

As far as the 'Living Persons' portion is concerned, how do I authenticate her existence when all credible information is on her website. Her website is not simply a resume portfolio but contains her repertoire of work so far and helps maintain a connection with her fans.

Please do not delete G.K. Sanghar's page as it bears a lot of relevance. GK Sanghar is only one of the few Punjabi TV personalities in Singapore, to have excelled in the media industry and serves as an inspiration to the youth. Just because her work is solely up on her website does not mean that her work is not legitimate and authentic given that station logos and show titles are made obvious. She has only been around 2 years and has covered appropriate publishing to broadcasting at a young age, and she is a familiar face.

Also, I have made amendments to the External Links with better referencing and removed all dead links.

Hope this clears it all up and do propose some advice.

Thanks, Preet 18:27, 12 January 2012 (UTC)Preet Sanghar — Preceding unsigned comment added by Preet Sanghar (talk • contribs)

Thank you sir

Dear Sir, It was my first effort to creat article for Wikipedia. I am glad to recieve your comments for the improvements. Sir. I made this article 'Vineet Soni' as he is voluntarily working to conserve the threatened plant species and running 'Save Gugul Movement'. His work got wide appriciation because he is working at grassroot level for conservation. Soni serves as an inspiration to the youth because evenafter completing the doctorate and post doctorate, he is working at the surface level to protect the plant species. UNESCO france published a special interview in different language in A World of Scinece. I did my best to remove the unreferenced contents from the article. I kindly request you to edit the article and prevent it from the deletion. If you still think that its not good, then remove it sir. With warm regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by NehaIndia (talk • contribs) 08:22, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Ghulam Nabi (footballer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ghulam Nabi (footballer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ghulam Nabi (footballer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. GiantSnowman 09:35, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

Theodore Abrahamson

Hi there. With this edit, you removed WP Norway from Talk:Theodore Abrahamson with the edit summary "Add living using AWB (7910)". Are there any specific for the removal, or is it just a moment of "inattention" using AWB? Cheers. Mentoz86 (talk) 16:03, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

Because he was member of the Wisconsin State Assembly, not Norway's. He was born in Norway, but moved to Wisconsin as a kid. He received his "fame" in Wisconsin. You generally only assign geographic banners where the person received their fame.

From WikiProject Norway, "This project covers the creation and editing of articles related to the nation of Norway, its cities, counties, geography, transport, culture, history and so on. It aims to expand Wikipedia's resources on Norway in a fair and accurate manner." This doesn't apply to Assemblyman in Wisconsin. Bgwhite (talk) 18:40, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

Ok, great. Your edit summary made me uncertain if it was intended to remove it. Have a pleasant weekend. Mentoz86 (talk) 19:12, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

Vineet Soni

Dear sir, As per your suggestion, I have included the significant coverage on Vineet soni arreared in Down to Earth. Now the article contains reliabe reserences, I jindly request you to remove the tag AfD. with regards --NehaIndia (talk) 20:15, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

Unfortunately, I cannot remove it. The Article for Deletion (AfD) process has to run its course. It takes a minimum of a week. Other people will also add their comments. In the end, an administrator will decide what to do based upon the comments. My Keep vote is just one opinion. Bgwhite (talk) 21:39, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Bgwhite. You have new messages at Mattlore's talk page.
Message added 20:41, 13 January 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Cheers. Mattlore (talk) 20:41, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

Greg Kats

Thanks for your edits, this looks much better. Do you have any thoughts for how to resolve your NPOV tag? Thanks. Aseal (talk) 15:36, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

Lacking AWB edit summary

In this edit you remove the WikiProject Norway banner and other changes yet your edit summary states something less. I assume these changes were intentional so I will simply remind you also to edit the edit summary when required. __meco (talk) 13:52, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

Edit warring

Please stop causing damage to the LGBT articles on RuPaul's drag race. I am planning on filing a dispute resolution and seek other administrator's guidance. PLEASE DO NOT EDIT ARTICLES until a concise resolution is determined. Please discuss on subject talk page ONLY. Thank you.--XLR8TION (talk) 01:53, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

I've already told you about WP:FACEBOOK and WP:NOTFACEBOOK. You are wanting to go against policy. You are the one who has already reverted 3 times. Bgwhite (talk) 01:56, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

Sarah Barlondo

I give up trying to get reliable sourcing at the Sarah Barlondo article. I've taken it to WP:BLPN. The Mark of the Beast (talk) 03:49, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

Korean actor

• Lee Sang-woo by --Sunuraju (talk) 13:09, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

Barnstar!

		The Categorisation Barnstar
		This is in recognition of the work you've begun in extrapolating the culture of name sorting at Wikipedia:Categorization of people. It is a very esoteric and confusing field, but your contributions thus far have been immensely helpful. I believe our own prior heated discussion was more based upon a lack of shared knowledge than any real animosity. Perhaps with shared ideas we can avoid future misunderstandings and be at our most happy and productive! Great work! SFB 13:46, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

Thank you. However, it is more stupidity on my part that I got involved in it. I had to go back thru talk pages to remember what our discussion was about. So, I have no hard feelings whatsoever. Your comments at the Categorization page were very helpful. Bgwhite (talk) 06:27, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Armand Mercier, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lowell (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:29, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

trout!

Feel trouted! You're bad gnome removed the AFC banner here. Regards, mabdul 23:39, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Ouch, that hurt, but was deserved. I swear I looked at the history and didn't see anything that would make the AFC relevant. I need to stop swearing and look at things more closely. Bgwhite (talk) 23:43, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

A defaultsorted kitten for you!

I'm thinking he goes under "Kitten, A", following feline naming conventions, but I defer to your expertise. This is just to say thanks for always picking up after me (and many others, I imagine) in small ways on my new biography articles. I've learned a lot about name sorting and proper use of the Metadata from watching your edits. Thanks for all you do!

Khazar (talk) 06:44, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

Dustin Lynch

For some reason, Billboard's search function is horribly incomplete and broken. The full Billboard country chart for this week is here. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 07:25, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

Odd edit summaries

On [1] the edit summary seems odd, since there is no books banner. The change is good though. Stuartyeates (talk) 23:21, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

Crap. Last 20 or so edits have had this for an edit summary. The "book banner" summary and the one without mentioning books looks the same to me on the little window of AWB. Sorry for not noticing. Bgwhite (talk) 23:32, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

re August Davidov

Thanks for adding the persondata to this article and the other fixes. Appreciated. Herostratus (talk) 17:47, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

Aly Saleh

Hi. You PRODded this, and I deleted it. Undeletion has been requested on my talk page, so I have restored it and now notify you in case you wish to consider taking it to AfD. Note that, though I can't confirm it, a talk page stalker says that the Arabic language reference to the ESEA does not actually mention Saleh. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 17:24, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

Ding Shijia

Dear Bgwhite; you suggested on this page (in edit comments) that his first and last name are interchanged. His actual name is Ding Shijia and not the other way around. Please check Forbes list and also ANTA sports official website Directors and Senior Management where he is listed by this name. Thanks for your efforts. Regards AKS (talk) 04:34, 18 January 2012 (UTC)

• I think you misunderstood. His name is Ding Shijia and I'm not disputing that. It is Chinese custom to write their surname first. So, his surname or family name is Ding, just like yours is Singh. In the article and the DEFAULTSORT, it was written as if Shijia was the surname. He goes by Mr. Ding and not Mr. Shijia. Sometimes, when somebody from China moves west, they change their name to western order. But, in the references, they addressed him as Mr. Ding, so he did not change it. Bgwhite (talk) 05:51, 19 January 2012 (UTC)

• Well, I did not know this. Thanks for sharing. Do you think I should change the article name OR put best is put a redirect on Shijia Ding to Ding Shijia. Comments please. Cheers AKS (talk) 05:59, 19 January 2012 (UTC)

• Generally, the title is what the person is goes by. He is known by Ding Shijia in China and in the western press, so no need to change. Korean, Vietnamese, Cambodian, Japanese and Hungarian names also follow the same pattern as Chinese names, but Hungarians and Japanese reverse the order of their name outside of their countries. Now, if we want some fun with names, lets start with those wacky Tamil and Kannada names. :) Bgwhite (talk) 06:15, 19 January 2012 (UTC)

• LOL. You forgot about Sri Lankan names; did you? They are insanely long & complicated. :-) You must check them out.AKS (talk) 05:30, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

Lee Sung-Jae (born 1976)

Hi, I understand what you mean and you're right. But This is my style. I'll replace wrong information with right information soon. If you check out my contributions, I'm very good wikepedia user regarding football. Don't worry about that and believe me. But please give me a time. I don't earn money from wikepdia. This is my just hobby. Anyway,,, I created about 20 footballers and these footballer is very important of korean football. So I'll fill out the accurate inoformation soon. I think it will take 5 days. So please wait.15:14, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

I already saw your past contributions and how good they were, which is why I asked you about the articles instead of taking it up to a higher authority. But, creating 10 or so articles in which very little information is correct is the wrong way to do things. You need to change you "style". Only create one article at a time, make sure the information is correct and add references to the article. Next time, another editor may see another one of your new articles and put a speedy delete on them. The article will be speedy deleted because of the multiple names, multiple birth dates, and other contradictory information. Bgwhite (talk) 06:40, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

This is special case. I'll be very busy soon. After finishing this article, I'll do not create footballer like this. Thanks for your advice.Footwiks (talk) 11:44, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

Thomas Eisfeld

Yes you certainly may. The new editors' edits have certainly become more like an edit war after I declined the original request, so I've now protected the article for 24 hours. Deryck C. 21:32, 31 January 2012 (UTC)

Thank you. Oi, what a mess. Bgwhite (talk) 21:49, 31 January 2012 (UTC)

Michael Milhoan

Hello Bgwhite; you had put an edit comment on Michael Milhoan. I just wanted to let you know that I have removed all IMDb ref as advised by you. I also created some more articles about Actors and you will find similar observations there as well. I will amend those articles as well. Thanks a lot for your time & support. Cheers AKS (talk) 05:25, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

Thank you AKS. A good general guideline about IMDB and some other sites is at Wikipedia:FACEBOOK. Shudder, you are right about Sri Lankan names. I find it funny that in China, they have short one syllable names. Go across the mountains and there are these names that take a couple of pages to write down and include everything from their hometown to their favorite colour. Of course I exaggerate just a little bit.  :) Bgwhite (talk) 05:40, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Bgwhite. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gabriel Akon.
Message added 19:35, 1 February 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Rahul Mothiya ^{(Talk2Me|Contribs)} 19:35, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Ralph Dewey

Hello! Your submission of Ralph Dewey at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Mgrē@sŏn 15:09, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

Greg Jones (basketball)

I saw that you took the tag for Wikiproject:Basketball off the talk page for Greg Jones (basketball) - why? His professional career in the Continental Basketball Association falls under this project. Thanks. Rikster2 (talk) 23:13, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject Basketball is for players outside the U.S. From their focus section, "WikiProject will focus on basketball outside the United States." I've been rudely informed on a couple of articles to keep Americans out of the WikiProject unless they have played overseas. Good question... If he doesn't fall under WP:Basketball, where does he go? I don't know, do what you thinks is best. Bgwhite (talk) 23:29, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

That's fair enough. Sorry anyone was rude to you over this as I've been also working under the assumption that the project was everything except US college and NBA basketball (as these have their own projects). I'll work with some of the other editors and sort out the scope. Rikster2 (talk) 23:41, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

Re: blpprods

Hi. I went on the basis that they had no reliable sources. Is the rule for blpprod that it has no citations but cites notability? --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 07:44, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

The footballers had reliable sources. Haven't a clue on the Korean one. In any event, the rule for BLPprod is:

"...the process requires that the article contain no sources in any form (as references, external links, etc.), which support any statements made about the person in the biography."

So, if there is there is a source, reliable or not, then the tag shouldn't be applied. Over the past summer, the rules did include reliable, but was removed in September. That is probably what is messing you up. It messed me up too.

There are cases where an unreliable source should be removed... A Facebook reference making claims about a 3rd party. I remove the source, but do I put a BLPprod or an unreferenced tag? If it is new, I put the BLPprod. But, I don't know of any rule about this. Bgwhite (talk) 07:55, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

Alright, I'll strive to keep that in mind. =D --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 14:49, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

Your hallucinations

I occasionally see Wikithings that I find mildly amusing, but it's rare that I literally LOL. This did it for me. MANdARAX • XAЯAbИAM 08:55, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

I'm glad I could be here for your amusement. It's usually my screw-ups that have people laughing at me. Did you see this about the DYK nomination I did. Balloonman did a great tag that will go on April 1st DYK... that Ralph Dewey blows up animals for Jesus? Bgwhite (talk) 09:05, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

Giovanni Dondi dell'Orologio

Hi, there!. It's no big deal, but I was a little surprised to see that you removed WikiProject History of Science from the article on Giovanni Dondi dell'Orologio - or was it vice versa? I had an idea that this rather remarkable mediaeval scientist might be of interest to that project. Was there any specific reason? Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 17:50, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

My mistake. I saw clockmaker and assumed incorrectly. I've restored the banner. Bgwhite (talk) 09:24, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Quite understandable. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 12:16, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Remove WP Sports with AWB

Hi. I notice you are removing the WP Sports tag from lots of articles with AWB. Please read the Rules of Use, which states "2.Don't edit too quickly; consider opening a bot account if you are regularly making more than a few edits a minute." You are making several edits every minute to do this. Please go to WP:BOTREQ if this needs removing from article talk pages. Thanks. Lugnuts (talk) 10:41, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

Um, WikiProject Sports does not include people. I'm only removing the banner from people. From WP:WikiProject Sports, "Also out of scope are individual athletes. These should be under the person's relevant sports Wikiproject". I'm averaging two edits a minutes, which is well withing the rules. I believe you are well aware of WikiProject Sports not belonging to people as most of the articles are about fencers that were created by you and you no longer add the banner to new fencing articles. I'm just cleaning up your well intentioned and understandable mistake. btw... I'm not going to be regularly doing this as this is somewhat of a distraction from my normal tasks. Bgwhite (talk) 18:19, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

The issue isn't around the removal of the tag, but the mis-use of AWB. I see you chose to ignore this, so I have no choice but to raise this at ANI to get you blocked. Thanks. Lugnuts (talk) 11:31, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

Egads, I'm not misusing AWB. The rules say "consider opening a bot account". It doesn't say I have to and I have done bots before. Rules say "few edits a minute". What is "few"?... 2, 3, 4. Removing a Banner goes by alot faster than a normal AWB edit. I'm fixing the mistakes that you caused and in which you haven't cleaned up. As I'm not causing any problems, what is your real problem with what I'm doing?

My opinion: AWB is not misused here. 2 edits per minute is fine. Checking BgWhite's edits is obvious they manually save them after checking. BgWhite is one of the editors that have very few (if any) self-reverts. Now on the removal of WPSPORTS thing: Since it's easy to determine which page is about a person and compare this against WPSPORTS banner, I would say that a bot could do the job faster and with less effort. -- Magioladitis (talk) 21:02, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

I see this as appropriate editing; appropriate use of AWB; and appropriate usage speed of AWB. Stuartyeates (talk) 21:27, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

Prophet (company) article

Dear Bgwhite,

I posted this article in the mainspace last month. So far, no new page patrollers have reviewed it. If you could possibly review it when you have a chance, I would be very grateful. Thank you!Braedon Farr (talk) 12:12, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

• (talk page stalker) Braedon, it looks good, but it reads a bit too much like the company brochure--esp. the lead. And why begin with accolades for employees of the company? Drmies (talk) 00:49, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

Ray Siderius article

Hi Bgwhite. It's probably best if you put the article on your watchlist, I may well forget to tell you about the AfD, although I will try and remember. You are, of course, more than welcome to take it there yourself should you see fit, or to tag it for speedy. You're wrong about the removal of WP:CSD tags - any editor apart from the creator can remove them. I didn't decline it (I'm not an admin) - I was the editor who originally tagged it for speedy; the creator objected on its talkpage. Technically, they should have added the hangon template or clicked 'contest', but either way has the same result. Cheers. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 23:42, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

C.S.Rao(actor)

Hi, This is regarding the change of title for the page :http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/C._S._Rao_(actor). Adding 'actor' is not appropriate as he is known as famous "writer". Pls change this to http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/C._S._Rao_(writer), which is appropriate. thanks & regards Raman Ramananugauta (talk) 03:39, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

 Done Bgwhite (talk) 22:38, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Richard Daneault, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brandon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:30, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Elizabeth Olin

Hi there, I was wondering why you deleted all of the articles associated with Elizabeth Olin's page? I understand that WP doesn't think IMDB is a reliable source, but there are plenty of news articles that were listed that were deleted. I'm a newb, so help is appreciated. :) Coutrystrong (talk) 18:13, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

The Wikipedia refs cannot be used because Wikipedia is not a reliable reference. Anybody can edit Wikipedia.

Facebook and twitter are not to be used as refs for the same reason, anybody can edit them and make up what they want. They are also not to be used in the external links section.

See WP:SOURCES for a better explanation. Bgwhite (talk) 18:31, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Kelapstick's talk page

Bg, I'm sorry, but that notification on User talk:Kelapstick is really going too far. I may start an ANI thread to ask for redress. Drmies (talk) 01:56, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

Högna Sigurðardóttir

Hello Bgwhite. I'm sure your bot usually does a good job helping you out with sorting but Icelandic names are a special case. They are sorted by the first name. See Icelandic names or, for example, Category:Prime Ministers of Iceland. But keep up the good work. I'm sure you're right in 99.9% of similar cases. - Ipigott (talk) 10:55, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

It's not a bot, but me doing it manually. FYI... If you see AWB in the summary, then it is manually done.

Per WP:SUR, which gets it from Wikipedia Talk:WikiProject Iceland#Sort keys for Icelandic names, Icelandic name do not follow normal convention. They are sorted last name first and any Icelandic category is sorted first name first. Bgwhite (talk) 18:06, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

Greg Smith

I know, but he has been on their roster. In any case, I think he's above the PROD threshold. Take the article to AFD, if you want. Zagalejo^^^ 00:38, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

He never was on the regular season roster. Nobility guidelines say, "Have appeared in one game..." It means regular season game. It never says has been on a preseason roster. If you are going to contest a prod, don't state invalid reasons. Yea, I know how basketball articles work at AFD... A foreign player has to play professional basketball, an American having played high school basketball qualifies. A sophomore high-school basketball player was kept because he was receiving mid-level recruiting interest and local papers had done a few stories on him. My favorite was a walk-on (Indiana, Illinois... was a Big-10 school) that played 8 total minutes in his career was kept because he did play in a game. The US bias is infuriating. To be fair, the European bias in football is just as bad. Bgwhite (talk) 00:56, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

Greg Smith is currently on assignment for the Houston Rockets. He hasn't played a game for them yet because he is in the D-League. DaHuzyBru (talk) 01:05, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

Yet assignment does not confer nobility. You "have won an award, or led the league in a major statistical category of the Continental Basketball Association or NBA Development League." He never has played an NBA game and never won an award or lead in the stats of the D-league. He does not merit automatic nobility. If this was a European player, he would not be getting an article. But, he played U.S. High School basketball, so he gets an article. Bgwhite (talk) 01:16, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

For the record, Smith was, briefly, on the the Rockets' active, regular season roster. (He was sent back to the Vipers, like, a day afterwards, but the NBA lists him as a D-League Call-Up.) I know that he didn't make an in-game appearance, but my edit summary was accurate. Anyway, Smith did earn a spot on the D-League All-Star team, which could be considered an award: [2] Zagalejo^^^ 02:12, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

Egbert Baque

Hallo Bgwhite, I am new to editing Wikipedia pages and wanted to ask if I added an appropriate amount of links to the page "Egbert Baque"? Beyond adding links to words/phrases, I could not find other information on specifically linking pages. Many thanks for your help. --Rcrainey (talk) 13:50, 18 February 2012 (UTC)rcrainey

I did some more cleaning up. I added a reference to the prize he was nominated for. I combined all the worldcat references into one link in the external links section. Removed the reference to Wikipedia as it is not allowed as an unreliable source... anybody can edit Wikipedia. I also cleaned up the over wikilinks. Generally it is best to have only one wikilink per subject... example is you had Cologne wikilinked multiple times.

I'm not exactly sure what you mean about "added an appropriate amount of links". But, if you are referring the the orphan tag at the top, that gets added when Egbert Baque is not wikilinked on another article somewhere on WikiPedia. Here is all the articles linked to Egbert Baque.

If you have any questions, do not hesitate to ask me. Bgwhite (talk) 20:53, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

Male Tennis Player Notability Help

New tennis article. He appears not to be notable. However, I'm not sure on the Men's side. Could you take a look? If he is notable, could you tell me why, so I can learn. Bgwhite (talk) 09:29, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

I sure can help. The players should always have an ITF and ATP link on the bottom of the page, as does Thomas Kromann. Look at the ATP link and you'll notice a career won-loss record in singles and doubles. If you look at the ITF link you'll see the same thing under "main draw" tour level only. Sometimes the win-loss doesn't match the atp and itf... I don't know why. Now according to Tennis Project Guidelines a player is notable if he has EVER played in the main draw of a tour level event... whether they win or lose or whether it's doubles or singles. So those win-loss records are dead giveaways of notability. If you look at the ATP playing activity it goes year by year and if you see a win or a loss at the top you can scroll down and find the actual tournament he played in. Instead of F1 or F2 (Futures) or Ch (Challenger)...you'll see blah blah 250, blah blah 500... those are tour events. In Thomas's case you see something different. In 2012 activity you see SLO vs. DEN EAGI 1st Rd... that's a Davis Cup event and simply playing in that also make a player instantly notable. To confirm you can go to www.daviscup.com and do a player search under Denmark and his name will appear. This guy is notable per tennis guidelines.

It's not in our guidelines but I'm gonna talk to editors about it. Any new player article should really have a ref to that notability source to help out wikipedia in sorting good articles from bad. I have been trying to do that myself in the last bunch of new players I've added. I'll put this on you talk page too so you'll always be able to find it in your archives if needed. I hope this helps you out and happy editing. Fyunck(click) (talk) 10:06, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

Myoma Myint Kywe‎

I saw your latest revert and had to laugh. Then I moved sideways to his dad, Myoma U Than Kywe and looked at the history ...

I came across this AfD and preferred to give it the benefit of the doubt given lack of English-language sources and lack of translation tools for the Burmese sources. I started expanding coverage on the awards, authors and government ministers who dish out awards to get a better feel for the area. There are huge gaps. Given the political situation, it is hard to find objective sources. But I have to agree that dumping in unsourced puff is not the way to fix the problem. Karate instructor, eh? :~) Aymatth2 (talk) 16:50, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

I'm sure statements that he is a professional golfer, cured cancer and will bring world peace will be added shortly. Hmmm, I wonder if Myoma U Than Kywe is Kim Jong-il's alter ego? I completely understand your position and commend you for it. Burmese articles do need a champion to help them out. I've been thinking of changing my vote to neutral because of your statements. Bgwhite (talk) 18:49, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

I do not feel strongly about this one myself. I started Sarpay Beikman Manuscript Awards with some lists of winners, which I assumed would be mostly notable authors, sort of like winning the Booker Prize. But when I try to find enough for an article, many of the authors do not have much coverage. That may not be entirely a language problem. To win an award, at least until recently, an author had to be government-approved. Maybe these are not the best authors. Most of the Burmese authors that do have articles did not win prizes, and vice-versa. I may keep adding content in this area. Some notable authors did win prizes. And I suppose just getting your picture in the paper with the Secretary-1 is something of a notable achievement. Aymatth2 (talk) 19:27, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

Christopher L. Bennett

Hi! I saw you removed the blog link from the article I created. Could you explain why? I don't object, I'm just relatively new to Wikipedia and would like to understand the rules. Eike Hein (talk) 16:57, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

No problem. The relevant guide is at WP:ELNO. Generally, social networking sites, blogs, fanzines and YouTube type sites shouldn't be in external links. Personally, if the person doesn't have a website given in the article, I don't mind one blog or social networking site. I also don't mind certain types of YouTube links, such as for a musician linking to a song of theirs.

The article you created is just fine except that it needs a couple of sources. Memory Alpha isn't a reliable source (it is a great site). A reliable source about some of his books is needed. Bgwhite (talk) 18:39, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

Hm well, I link to his official website, which has his bibliography. Isn't that a reliable source? Eike Hein (talk) 01:04, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

No. He can make up anything he wants. Reliable third-party sources are best. See WP:SOURCES for a better explanation than I ever could give. Bgwhite (talk) 09:57, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

Dance Moms

Look at the top row--is that better? Drmies (talk) 00:47, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

Looks better. It has been awhile since I took a list to FLC, but at that time, you couldn't use color backgrounds that had text. There were exceptions based on color and use, but the cell had to have a mark, like an asterisk. Bgwhite (talk) 00:59, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

 Done Thanks for pointing this out (you and the Lady) in the first place. I mean, I knew it was ugly, but I didn't know it violated more than just standards of decency. I left an explanation on the talk page; let's hope it doesn't get changed back. It's your favorite show too, right? Drmies (talk) 01:18, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

I don't have cable. After seeing the description of the show, it just reinforced my stance that cable is a waste of money and Netflix is wonderful. I do miss Alton... Bgwhite (talk) 06:47, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

Well, I guess you can use your Netflix to catch up on the best of cable. For me, that means Breaking Bad. (Of course, within the last day, I've said that I didn't like The Social Network or The Matrix, two exceedingly popular films, so my taste may be somewhat eccentric.) MANdARAX • XAЯAbИAM 08:57, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

I have seen the 1st season of Breaking Bad on Netflix and the 2nd season is on my todo. I refuse to watch The social network because of our mutual hatred of Facebook. I just got done watching the 1st season Downton Abbey. Currently on the 2nd season of BBC's Being Human and 3rd season of Sons of Anarchy is next. Edwardian drama, Vampire/Ghost/Werewolf and Motorcycle gang shows. I think that is eclectic. Has someone watched The Princess Bride yet? Bgwhite (talk) 09:08, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

Sorry, I meant to answer this, then I got involved in writing a coupla articles, and it slipped my mind. I'm glad to see that you've watched some of Breaking Bad and liked it enough to want more. I've never heard of Downton Abbey or the BBC's Being Human. I was aware of the SyFy channel's Being Human (which I've now discovered is based on the BBC series), but I've never seen it and know nothing about it. As for Sons of Anarchy, I saw the first episode, didn't like it, and haven't watched it since. Yes, I've finally seen The Princess Bride, and answered that question more thoroughly on my talk page.

Oh, BTW, did you realize that your recent edits are not marked as minor? Once, the "Minor edit" box on my AWB somehow got unchecked accidentally, and I didn't realize it for a while. MANdARAX • XAЯAbИAM 23:27, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

Hi. I was hoping that we can reach a compromise for the colors in the Dance Moms article. I tried lightening some of the colors to make them more compliant with Wikipedia guidelines. Since you were the one who added the Color tag, I'd like you to take a look at the new colors. If you say they look good then I'll add them to the article. For An Angel (talk) 18:45, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

FYI - AfD for Ray Siderius

As you requested, here is the link to the AfD for Ray Siderius. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 22:09, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

Stian Sortevik

Hi there. I PROD'ed Stian Sortevik last night, and to be honest, I didn't believe that the PROD would go through. But that was because I believed some unexperienced editors, not familiar with the notability guidelines would just remove the tag. But I didn't see this coming, one of the most experienced editors (you) removing a PROD on an not-notable footballer. Yes he is in the squad of Stabæk, but WP:NFOOTY clearly states that you have to play a match, not only be in the squad, to be notable. And for the futsal-part: futsal is like any other sport: "have participated in a major international amateur or professional competition at the highest level such as the Olympics." Qualification matches for the World Cup is not enough. I'm not going to do anything else about this article, since he will probably play when Tippeligaen starts this spring (it's WP:CRYSTAL, but I can't be arsed to take all these footballers to AfD when they will be notable in two months), but the next time you might want to know the notability guidelines before removing a PROD. Sincerely, Mentoz86 (talk) 11:23, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

But not a karate teacher

I thought I would add the sumo wrestling and octuplets later, after getting past the initial scrutiny for a new article... Seriously, Daw Win Win Myint illustrates the difficulty with Burmese writers. At least six books, many poems and stories published in magazines, two major national awards, and this article gives the sum total of what can be found on the web in English. The defaultsort with Burmese names is just the name as written? I will try to remember to put that in. Thanks for the hint. Aymatth2 (talk) 13:24, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

Antal Andrássy

Thank you for offering to help, but the problem has been solved. --Norden1990 (talk) 19:27, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

Bot run for Wikiproject sport

Thanks for the compliment on the water polo work. :) I'd really like to see some one create an article about the Great Britain women's team. There should be a few articles to illustrate it for the current squad if some one wants to visually identify who they are. :) Commented on the Wikiproject sport thing. --LauraHale (talk) 09:17, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

American so I can understand the pain of issues with sport. Australia has freedom of panorama. I can take sport pictures here that I can't in the USA. (And then, after seeing a Commons photographer with his $1,300 camera, I went out and got one because I see enough live sports and upload enough crap pictures using my iPhone to make it worth while.) Water polo live is fun. The level of play is truly outstanding. :) I'm hoping having successfully done one team that I can get permission from others. (My goal is the Australia women's national basketball team, who have a training camp in Canberra in May.) Supervisor is giving me feedback on the Ides of March. Working through existing feedback. I need to get my abstract written and a few other things. My dissertation should pass on examination with major/minor revisions at this point. Thus, not as stressed as I could be. But yes, no real strenuous objections from me. :) --LauraHale (talk) 09:58, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

BAGBot: Your bot request BG19bot 2

Someone has marked Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/BG19bot 2 as needing your input. Please visit that page to reply to the requests. Thanks! AnomieBOT⚡ 21:51, 25 February 2012 (UTC) To opt out of these notifications, place {{bots|optout=operatorassistanceneeded}} anywhere on this page.

Giacinto Berloco

Dear Bgwhite, I noted your contribution to Talk:Giacinto Berloco. You have rated the article as stub class. I have checked the quality scale and it describes stub class as "...little more than a dictionary definition". Feeling some pride for the articles I write, and having spend some time on this article, I tend to feel this is a low nomination which does not do the article justice. In my (as writer probably biased) opinion the article is more a start class, described in the quality scale as "Provides some meaningful content, but the majority of readers will need more.". I would like to ask you reconsider the rating of this article. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Taketa (talk) 22:17, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Rating an article is somewhat subjective. Rating can also be done by anyone. If you feel it is a start, then do it... I have no objections. Bgwhite (talk) 23:26, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Thank you

Thanks very much for your helpful edits to the new article I created, Olly Blackburn. ;) Much appreciated! — Cirt (talk) 06:46, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

He was a journalist. And he does fit the criteria of Media, having worked in multiple different forms of media: television, film, commercials, and music videos, as well as journalism. There's no need to remove the archival info and talk page header, they are only helpful. :) — Cirt (talk) 06:57, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

He wasn't notable for a journalist. Shouldn't add banners for things they weren't notable for. Example, you wouldn't add the Golf banner to every politician. The Criminal Biography banner for politicians is a different story...

Per MOS guidelines, the archive banner only goes on a talk page that contains alot of archives. Also, you had it auto archiving every 30 days, so your talk messages would be deleted. The Talk Header template only goes on pages that have alot of debate, that are controversial subject or high profile people. Blackburn doesn't meet this guideline. Bgwhite (talk) 07:09, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

Yeah, but for a page like this, simply can only benefit to have the talk header and archiving already setup, doesn't hurt it at all. :) — Cirt (talk) 07:13, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

He is not notable for journalism and television... banners should be removed. Getting an award for a commercial does not make one notable for TV. The archives DO hurt. Any talk message is deleted and most people don't look at the archives. Having a talk message visible or not... I'd vote visible. This person is probably not going to get alot of messages. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bgwhite (talk • contribs)

Well, I've taken your advice to heart, and changed the archival to 5 threads min left on the page, and only every 90 days of inactivity, so the archives can't hurt now. :) — Cirt (talk) 17:26, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

Vitaly Savelyev

Hi Bgwhite. Please look at the infobox after your edit. Templates {{Birth-date and age}} and {{Birth date and age}} shouldn't be mixed. "Persondata" template have been also broken by you, cause you missed a bracket. Regards, Sealle (talk) 11:33, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

Just for info

Re: Pat thingy - my comments on the talk page:

"The Latin isn't Latin, it's Lorem ipsum - mock or modified Latin used as a filler or placeholder. This indicates that the site is probably under construction. Peridon (talk) 13:15, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

Yep - the address is that of 93VISIONS, a supplier of free templates. That is unlikely to be the address of the charity. Peridon (talk) 13:18, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

Virtually the whole thing is in Lorem ipsum. I know I wouldn't put a site up in such an early state of construction. Peridon (talk) 13:20, 28 February 2012 (UTC)" Peridon (talk) 13:22, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

Re: Proposed deletion of James Hahn (naval officer)

Hi Bgwhite - fine by me - the only reason i created the page was to split the information out from the article on Hahn Island, where it was overloading and unbalancing the article. BTW, the fact that a landmass (even if only a small island) is named after a person is usually enough for that person's article to survive a prod, so I have removed that... you may want to take this to a full AfD. Grutness...wha? 00:22, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

Amanda Mair charting

The link you see is a few days late in reporting the charts that are published every Friday morning. Here is the link for Amanda Mair charting date 24 February 2012 in week 8 of the Swedish Albums Chart. http://www.sverigetopplistan.se/ The albums chart indicates her as a new entry to the Top 60 Albums chart straight at #16 in the first week of the release of her self-titled album Amanda Mair. The reference I gave in the swedishcharts.com will show it automatically in only 2-3 days, as they need time to duplicate the information they receive from the official sverigetopplistan.se chart. The reason I put the swedishcharts.com is that it is permanent whereas the page sverigetopplistan.se gets updated and the front page gets replaced with newer charts every week. For example swedishcharts.com shows the 17 February chart with Ansiktet #1 with "Äckligt" whereas we already know the #1 was replaced and now Michel Teló is the #1 with "Ai se eu te pego!" with chart dated 24 February... So there also the http://www.swedishcharts.com is lagging a few days as well.... werldwayd (talk) 03:27, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

Now http://www.swedishcharts.com has updated its information and the link which is reference #4 clearly indicated the #16 charting position of Amanda Mair here with the Amanda Mair album: http://www.swedishcharts.com/showitem.asp?interpret=Amanda+Mair&titel=Amanda+Mair&cat=a Also thanks for your kind comments. werldwayd (talk) 23:47, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

Some baklava for you!

weldone Edirin247 (talk) 15:37, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

Persondata bot

Greetings BG, its the IP formerly known as Kumioko. I was also working on a task for the Persondata short description and the only way I could get it to work reasonably well was to start with the more important stuff and work down. So basically I did several groups for several things. I had a group that dealt with politicians and started with President and went down from there (I had about 200 different politician categories captured), then it would go into another group that added military stuff like General, Medal of Honor, a couple other medals like Navy Cross, and down (that had about 500 categories, then I went into A few other things like people who won a Nobel prize or about 20 other things. I was still working on it but I was up over 1500 lines of code and still working on it. I don't think its going to be an easy thing to do with the edit perfectionists out there. I got pissed at the whole situation and deleted the code (as well as the 9500 plus lines for adding infoboxes) but I thought I would tell you the thought process I had anyway in case it would help. Good luck. BTW, I forgot to mention I was only working on US stuff so including non US stuff will be a lot more complicated. 71.163.243.232 (talk) 04:09, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

I also noticed your comments here. I'm sad to hear that me and the work I tried to do has been reduced to the butt of a joke and sorry that they made that comment in general. Comments like that and seeing how people thought of me are making me feel better about my decision to stop editing. Cheers. 71.163.243.232 (talk) 04:33, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

Yup, your work is the gift that keeps on giving :). It made me mad. I wrote several drafts of responses that were none to nice. I slept on it, calmed down and then told the person to ($_%#? Off.

I do a few things different when I need a change of pace for a few hours. Most are winding down. So, going thru category by category will be becoming my new change of pace routine. Thank you for all the help you have given me. If you ever need something done around here, give me a yell Bgwhite (talk) 06:48, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

Balktack

Hello. You have a new message at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Sports's talk page.. I hope that was just a typo... — SMcCandlish   Talk⇒ ɖ∘¿¤þ   Contrib. 09:30, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

A couple questions about editing

Greetings Bgwhite, per the discussion on my talk page I was hoping I could ask a couple questions so I don't have to keep beating up ACdixon with all my stupid questions. I have had quite a few so I figure if I spread them out a little I won't burn out one editor. :-) I am finding editing to be quite difficult frankly and am gathering quite a few notes/questions on my user page so I figure I better ask around and get some out of the way. It seems like the more experienced users do things intuitively that aren't necessarily written in "Da rules" (sorry for the Fairly odd parents reference, couldn't resist) anywhere for us new folks.

1. How do I add the ability of seeing persondata and why are the instructions so difficult? Why not just add a checkbox under my preferences or gadgets or something? I think I have followed the directions but still don't see it.
2. What are more important and what takes precedence, Policies, Guidelines, Essays, other stuff?
3. Can anyone add the WikiProject banner for a project? Do you need to be a member of the project? I added a couple and thought I should ask before I incur the wrath of some unhappy editor. No offense intended but that seems to happen quite a bit around here.
4. Is there anything special I need to do about duplicative ones (Biography and Military work group; Military history and Biography task force for example seems sorta duplicative to me).
5. Why do some project banners add red links like Category:Wikipedia requested photographs of the American Civil War? I found several but this is just an example. My guess is that Kumioko editor meant to do them but didn't have a chance to before they Retired based on this page: User:Kumioko/WikiProject category tracking.
6. Is there a standard naming policy for parameter names of things like WikiProject templates. For example, some say (needs-image, needs photo, photo-needed, with and without the - or with spaces, etc.)? I assume the answer is no and I think thats very confusing for new users.

Sorry so many, these are just the Persondata, WikiProject banner related ones and I noticed you deal with those quite a bit. ShmuckatellieJoe (talk) 21:05, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

No problem in asking me questions. Ask as many as you want. I've got my little niche in Wikipedia land. I know or stumbled onto things in my niche. But, go out into something else in Wikia and I can become lost. Yes, there is a learning curve around here. The best things you can do is don't do to many things, don't go to quickly and pick an area you want to explore. Ohh... and ask questions.

1. I don't have anything to "see" persondata. I use a tool to enter vales into persondata and fix other errors. A very easy tool is, Wikipedia:Persondata-o-matic. The idiot wonderful computer people updated yesterday the version of MediaWiki that Wikipedia uses. The update has broken user scripts, so for right now, you can't see persondata the way you are trying. It's broken alot of things I use too.
2. Usually it is Policy and then Guidelines. Essays usually don't contain any rules. Some essays are just a person's thoughts and others contain useful information. Each WikiProject may have their own set of rules.
3. The Biography and Military Projects are separate. Each Project is in their own separate universe. Setting the military work group in Biography will put the article in a special spot in Biography land. The only things that overlap are "listas" and "need-infobox". If it is a Biography article, listas should only go into the Biography banner. I usually put need-infobox outside of all the the banners using the {{Infobox requested}} template.
4. There shouldn't be any red links from banners. As you said, either Kumioko was planning to do it or he made a mistake.
5. There is no standard naming policy. However....

1. Wikipedia:Talk page layout is the policy on how the talk page is laid out.
2. WikiProject Biography is the first Project Banner to go on the page of living people. After that, I usually put them in alphabetical order.
3. I usually put the parameters in a banner the way they are ordered in the template. Template:Wikiproject Biography has living first and class second, so that is the way I order them. I use a tool that puts listas last, but otherwise I try and follow the order.
4. I don't put spaces in between things. For example, class=start and not class = start. Listas requires no spaces, so I do it for everything else. Kumioko and I did it because we are computer people and spaces makes the files bigger. Old habits die hard.
5. needs-photo= is the standard way, so I put it that way. However, for biographies, I put it outside the banners in the {{Image requested}} template. I know if the Biography has the musician work group, the image requested template looks like: {{Image requested|musicians}}. Image requested allows you to make multiple photo requests.
6. I use a tool called AutoHotkey to fill in things. If I press the windows key + "s", it prints out "|sports-work-group=yes|sports-priority=low". My script is at User:Bgwhite/AutoHotkey. I also have a notepad open so I can copy paste somethings I can't remember.... all the different parameters for Image requested for example.

I didn't learn things overnight and I still learn things. Don't worry about making mistakes, because you will. Just try the best you can. Bgwhite (talk) 23:50, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

Thank you so much for the help. I have a lot going on this weekend so I didn't know if I was gonna be able to login till next week. Just wanted to say thanks for taking the time. ShmuckatellieJoe (talk) 01:47, 3 March 2012 (UTC)