User talk:Alexf/Archive 69
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Alexf. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 65 | ← | Archive 67 | Archive 68 | Archive 69 | Archive 70 |
May need to revoke TPA
A user you blocked (The Unusual Henytan) has continued to post promotional content on their talk page, so it may be necessary to revoke talk page access. It seems to be a clear promotion-only account. TornadoLGS (talk) 19:14, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Nice block
Thanks for blocking Ali hussan2006. He was becoming an annoyance. SniperReverter (Talk to me) 16:29, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted page under G11
Hey there, fairly new to wiki editing so was likely correctly moderated (apologies) but having read through the CSD had enough trepidation/uncertainty to raise the issue. Please find the Redlink to aformentioned page attached.
This page related to the Reality Engine, the video game engine powering Roblox - 58.8 million daily active users as of Q3 2022 so certainly meets notability requirement; on notability I'd also point to Unity and Unreal Engine which both hold pages on this site. Would really appreciate some extended feedback, does a page require extensive contents to be approved, was it correctly moderated under the wrong rule etc.
Thank you, JedDevs (talk) 00:35, 5 January 2023 (UTC)JedDevs
- That is an old page indeed! I am not saying the subject does not meet the requirements. The writing was totally devoid of sourcing, and was written like an ad for it, and for the game. It was deleted based on that writing. I do not know if the Reality Engine already has an article (could not find one with that name). Certainly Roblox is notable and already has an article, which does not mention this engine at all. If you have sufficient reliable sources to assert notability, then you can write an article for it. If are unfamiliar with article writing, you should read Your First Article. If you have questions about how Wikipedia works, please ask at the Teahouse. -- Alexf(talk) 01:06, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – January 2023
News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2022).
Administrator changes
Interface administrator changes
CheckUser changes
Oversighter changes
Guideline and policy news
- Speedy deletion criterion A5 (transwikied articles) has been repealed following an unopposed proposal.
Arbitration
- Following the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections, the following editors have been appointed to the Arbitration Committee: Barkeep49, CaptainEek, GeneralNotability, Guerillero, L235, Moneytrees, Primefac, SilkTork.
- The 2021-22 Discretionary Sanctions Review has concluded with many changes to the discretionary sanctions procedure including a change of the name to "contentious topics". The changes are being implemented over the coming month.
- The arbitration case Stephen has been closed.
Miscellaneous
- Voting for the Sound Logo has closed and the winner is expected to be announced February to April 2023.
- Tech tip: You can view information about IP addresses in a centralised location using bullseye which won the Newcomer award in the recent Coolest Tool Awards.
The Bugle: Issue 201, January 2023
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 19:44, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
Help with checking a translation
Hello Alexf, I am looking for a native Spanish speaker to help check a translation and your name was very early on in the WP:BABEL Spanish group. Warning, the topic I am asking you to check is on sexual assault and rape and is graphic. If you are not comfortable with this topic, please reject me. If you are willing and able to help, can you check if the text I have added here matches this source here? Thank you. starship.paint (exalt) 03:19, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
- Not really comfortable with these types of subjects, but took a quick look. The translation is ok, but my issue with the piece is that there are no recordings or corroborations, and it is her word of what transpired. Not sure if it is reliable enough to post, giving it is a BLP. Sure, the judge seems to have seen enough evidence to arrest him. This is a subject outside of what I do, so not sure how much detail has to be included in an article. -- Alexf(talk) 12:19, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you very much for your help, Alexf. Personally given WP:PUBLICFIGURE, I think allegations can be written about given coverage. I just discovered additional coverage in El Pais. [1] As for the case itself, it seems that the alleged victim immediately told friends/doorman, physical evidence (injuries/dress) have been submitted, there is a recording showing the two having gone inside the bathroom for about 15 minutes, and Alves apparently changed his story multiple times about the event, that’s that. Again, I thank you for your help despite your discomfort, and I apologise for having caused that. starship.paint (exalt) 15:09, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
AganaNsiire
Hi,
In 2018, you indefinitely blocked AganaNsiire (talk · contribs). You said that it's for "spam". I guess it's because of this edit, which you reverted. It's not spam, but a legitimate news website, to which there are links from many Wikipedia article. The target of that link is here now; I wouldn't add it to the article myself, because it's just an opinion article on a news website, and there are more valuable sources about that topic, but it's definitely not outright spam.
If you thought that it's spam because the article is written by the same user, then as far as I know, it's not against policy by itself, and not a reason to block indefinitely without warning.
Would you agree to unblock that account? I have reasons that he can make positive contributions to Wikipedia, and I can vouch for him.
Thanks! Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 15:41, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
- @Amire80: I researched further as I don' t remember that far back. It was for another edit, stopped by a filter where they spammed their own website. Check it out, and comment please. I am opposed at this time, unless further info from the user is forthcoming. -- Alexf(talk) 16:31, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
- Can you please tell me how? I don't see it in Special:Log/abusefilter, but maybe I'm searching something incorrectly. Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 16:35, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
- @Amire80: On the link on this section, click on it to see their contributions. You will see " User contributions for AganaNsiire" . On the right there should be a link for "filter log". -- Alexf(talk) 16:39, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
- OK, I see. I guess it's because the domain was the same as the username. That indeed shouldn't have been added as an external link, but I still have all reasons to believe that it's a good-faith editor that made a beginner's mistake, and for these two things he shouldn't have been indefinitely blocked. Again, I believe that even though he made these mistakes, and generally made few edits in Wikimedia wikis, he can make valuable contributions in English and other languages, and I can vouch for him. Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 16:56, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
- His main edit was to come in, and spam his website. He never came back to ask for guidance, explain, complain, nothing, even though clear instructions were left. If you want to engage him, or even unblock, go ahead but I am not for it. I believe editors should not spam their website, and if unclear, they should ask. The user talk page has been left open for years and yet, no complaints. Your call. I am not getting involved any more that I was at the time. -- Alexf(talk) 17:04, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks. I will unblock and take responsibility for this.
- I will nevertheless note that saying that his "main edit" was spam and reducing all his activity just to that is quite wrong. He created an article (without sources, but it was later improved) and made useful edits on Incubator and Meta. These aren't things that should be ignored. Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 17:43, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
- His main edit was to come in, and spam his website. He never came back to ask for guidance, explain, complain, nothing, even though clear instructions were left. If you want to engage him, or even unblock, go ahead but I am not for it. I believe editors should not spam their website, and if unclear, they should ask. The user talk page has been left open for years and yet, no complaints. Your call. I am not getting involved any more that I was at the time. -- Alexf(talk) 17:04, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
- OK, I see. I guess it's because the domain was the same as the username. That indeed shouldn't have been added as an external link, but I still have all reasons to believe that it's a good-faith editor that made a beginner's mistake, and for these two things he shouldn't have been indefinitely blocked. Again, I believe that even though he made these mistakes, and generally made few edits in Wikimedia wikis, he can make valuable contributions in English and other languages, and I can vouch for him. Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 16:56, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
- @Amire80: On the link on this section, click on it to see their contributions. You will see " User contributions for AganaNsiire" . On the right there should be a link for "filter log". -- Alexf(talk) 16:39, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
- Can you please tell me how? I don't see it in Special:Log/abusefilter, but maybe I'm searching something incorrectly. Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 16:35, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
Happy Adminship Anniversary!
| | Happy adminship anniversary! Hi Alexf! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of your successful request for adminship. Enjoy this special day! CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 18:47, 24 January 2023 (UTC) |  |
- Thanks! -- Alexf(talk) 19:06, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
What just happened
Well… Something just happened to my account in chinese wikipedia, I just got blocked, but i’m only making a article about 23002 Jillhirsch. When I was going to submit it, The system just said that I got blocked beacause of: Destroying articles. And sorry I’m kinda bad of english… but I’m not even doing that, I’m just making the article normally… SussybakaWeiji (talk) 19:32, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
- This is the English language Wikipedia. They are separate. Nothing we can do here. You have to contact someone there. -- Alexf(talk) 20:56, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – February 2023
News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2023).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- Following an RfC, the administrator policy now requires that prior written consent be gained from the Arbitration Committee to mark a block as only appealable to the committee.
- Following a community discussion, consensus has been found to impose the extended-confirmed restriction over the topic areas of Armenia and Azerbaijan and Kurds and Kurdistan.
Technical news
- The Vector 2022 skin has become the default for desktop users of the English Wikipedia.
Arbitration
- The arbitration case Armenia-Azerbaijan 3 has been opened and the proposed decision is expected 24 February 2023.
- In December, the contentious topics procedure was adopted which replaces the former discretionary sanctions system. The contentious topics procedure is now in effect following an initial implementation period. There is a detailed summary of the changes and administrator instructions for the new procedure. The arbitration clerk team are taking suggestions, concerns, and unresolved questions about this new system at their noticeboard.
Miscellaneous
- Voting in the 2023 Steward elections will begin on 05 February 2023, 21:00 (UTC) and end on 26 February 2023, 21:00 (UTC). The confirmation process of current stewards is being held in parallel. You can automatically check your eligibility to vote.
- Voting in the 2023 Community Wishlist Survey will begin on 10 February 2023 and end on 24 February 2023. You can submit, discuss and revise proposals until 6 February 2023.
- Tech tip: Syntax highlighting is available in both the 2011 and 2017 Wikitext editors. It can help make editing paragraphs with many references or complicated templates easier.
The Bugle: Issue 202, February 2023
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:25, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
Hi, I've noticed that you hid a revision on that page per RD2. It happens that the revision prior to it and the one after it (yes, my revision) also includes RD2-able content, as it seems like a different IP vandalized back in September - and it was not corrected until a third IP removed it. Best regards, LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 11:34, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
Monterey, California
Hi Alexf, I just stumbled upon [2] via AIV and wondered about the criterion used. I apply RD3 pretty liberally, but it seems to exclude spam links, so I somehow felt that exclusion might apply to the other RDs as well. Is there a past discussion or guidance about this somewhere? ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:34, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
- @ToBeFree: Many people come here to spam their business, blog, or news platform. I do not like enabling spammers and making this a platform for them. They should understand that spam is not acceptable. Making a reference to a legit site that is newsworthy is not spam. Pointing to their blog, or company site to drive business and traffic to them, should not be accepted. -- Alexf(talk) 23:57, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
Blocked user returns to vandalism
Hello. A user you blocked, User:108.49.199.118 , vandalized Sia today. -- Ssilvers (talk) 02:23, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – March 2023
News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2023).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- Following a request for comment, F10 (useless non-media files) has been deprecated.
- Following a request for comment, the Portal CSD criteria (P1 (portal subject to CSD as an article) and P2 (underpopulated portal)) have been deprecated.
- A request for comment is open to discuss making the closing instructions for the requested moves process a guideline.
Technical news
- The results of the 2023 Community Wishlist Survey have been posted.
Arbitration
- Remedy 11 ("Request for Comment") of the Conduct in deletion-related editing case has been rescinded.
- The proposed decision for the Armenia-Azerbaijan 3 case is expected 7 March 2023.
- A case related to the Holocaust in Poland is expected to be opened soon.
Miscellaneous
- The 2023 appointees for the Ombuds commission are AGK, Ameisenigel, Bennylin, Daniuu, Emufarmers, Faendalimas, JJMC89, MdsShakil, Minorax and Renvoy as regular members and Zabe as advisory members.
- Following the 2023 Steward Elections, the following editors have been appointed as stewards: Mykola7, Superpes15, and Xaosflux.
- The Terms of Use update cycle has started, which includes a
[p]roposal for better addressing undisclosed paid editing
. Feedback is being accepted until 24 April 2023.
The Bugle: Issue 203, March 2023
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 21:28, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
Speedy deletion contested: The Voice Generations Philippines
Hello Alexf. I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of The Voice Generations Philippines, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: A7 is not applicable for TV. Thank you. BangJan1999 21:30, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
Sock account
Hi there - you recently blocked TheOnlineMillionaire. They admitted (pre-block) to being the same person that operates the account Emillion79, and said they would only use the TheOnlineMillionaire account. Should the Emillion79 account be blocked outright, or only if they use it to evade the block of TheOnlineMillionaire? --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 04:38, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
- I'd wait and see, after your note to them. -- Alexf(talk) 10:25, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – April 2023
News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2023).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- A community RfC is open to discuss whether reports primarily involving gender-related disputes or controversies should be referred to the Arbitration enforcement noticeboard.
Technical news
- Some older web browsers will not be able to use JavaScript on Wikimedia wikis starting this week. This mainly affects users of Internet Explorer 11. (T178356)
- The rollback of Vector 2022 RfC has found no consensus to rollback to Vector legacy, but has found rough consensus to disable "limited width" mode by default.
- A link to the user's Special:CentralAuth page will now appear in the subtitle links shown on Special:Contributions. This was voted #17 in the Community Wishlist Survey 2023.
Arbitration
- The Armenia-Azerbaijan 3 case has been closed.
- A case about World War II and the history of Jews in Poland has been opened, with the first evidence phase closing 6 April 2023.
The Bugle: Issue 204, April 2023
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 21:29, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
Speedy deletion declined: User:Abdiasiis haji/sandbox
Hello Alexf. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of User:Abdiasiis haji/sandbox, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not unambiguously promotional. Thank you. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 12:24, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – May 2023
News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2023).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- A request for comment about removing administrative privileges in specified situations is open for feedback.
Technical news
- Progress has started on the Page Triage improvement project. This is to address the concerns raised by the community in their 2022 WMF letter that requested improvements be made to the tool.
Arbitration
- The proposed decision in the World War II and the history of Jews in Poland case is expected 11 May 2023.
Miscellaneous
- The Wikimedia Foundation annual plan 2023-2024 draft is open for comment and input through May 19. The final plan will be published in July 2023.
You may wish to revoke TPA. Cahk (talk) 07:53, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
- @Cahk:
Done -- Alexf(talk) 08:40, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue 205, May 2023
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:33, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
Delete User:FeesasTime0
Hello @Alexf.
Thanks for blocking the above user, can you please delete their user page too? - 🔥𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 21:30, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
- @Illusion Flame: I see it has already been done. -- Alexf(talk) 22:05, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
Salebot10
Suggest you revoke talk page access following your block of Salebot10 (talk · contribs). Thanks. 10mmsocket (talk) 12:14, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
- Was done already - RedvDel was now done too. Thanks. -- Alexf(talk) 12:58, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
VRT, lost password & block
ticket:2023051710014919 could do with your attention please. Cabayi (talk) 06:38, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
- @Cabayi: I never use it, so I tried. It does not let me in. I do have the proper password (I checked) and the Authenticator 2FA token, but still fails to allow entry. Asked for a reset, system said it sent email, Email never came (not even to spam folder), so something is wrong. Can't enter. Sorry. -- Alexf(talk) 10:24, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – June 2023
News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2023).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- Following an RfC, editors indefinitely site-banned by community consensus will now have all rights, including sysop, removed.
- As a part of the Wikimedia Foundation's IP Masking project, a new policy has been created that governs the access to temporary account IP addresses. An associated FAQ has been created and individual communities can increase the requirements to view temporary account IP addresses.
Technical news
- Bot operators and tool maintainers should schedule time in the coming months to test and update their tools for the effects of IP masking. IP masking will not be deployed to any content wiki until at least October 2023 and is unlikely to be deployed to the English Wikipedia until some time in 2024.
Arbitration
- The arbitration case World War II and the history of Jews in Poland has been closed. The topic area of Polish history during World War II (1933-1945) and the history of Jews in Poland is subject to a "reliable source consensus-required" contentious topic restriction.
Miscellaneous
- Following a community referendum, the arbitration policy has been modified to remove the ability for users to appeal remedies to Jimbo Wales.
User Talk IPs
I know you just left them a note instead of blocking them, and I assumed that was that for my AIV report so I removed it, but are you sure they're not the same person? (maybe I'm assuming you saw my report, and you didn't actually see it).
Summary:
I reported 203.180.194.249 for likely block evasion of 203.180.194.247 (who is currently blocked). The reason for that, other than that they are in the same /28 IP range, is that both of these IPs do this user talk page stuff, both include the same words somewhere and do number counting things (and frankly a lot of other similar behaviour). The .247 has also edited both the .249's talk page (diff:1153894914) and the talk page of the other IP I mentioned 39.110.203.250 (their first 3 edits).
1 to 2 hours ago the active IP doing this talk page stuff was 203.180.194.248.
For ease of investigation:
- 203.180.194.247 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) *the currently blocked IP.
- 203.180.194.249 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) *the IP that you removed the talk page spam from and left the note. (.247 edit: [1])
- 39.110.203.250 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) *an IP that has been blocked before and does the same thing. (.247 edits: [1], [2] & [3])
- 203.180.194.248 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) *most recently active IP, does the same talk page thing, has been blocked once.
– 2804:F14:80B6:3101:94AC:3D6C:795E:EF8A (talk) 01:45, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
- Well at any rate, the .249 has since also edited over your note with the same behaviour, completely ignoring it, regardless of if these IPs are all the same person and evading the .247's block or not.
- – 2804:F14:80B6:3101:94AC:3D6C:795E:EF8A (talk) 06:20, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
- Actually, I've noticed <this>, which seemingly includes the name of a real school that matches the 203 IPs. I don't know if this is, as some of the pages imply, something that a school is doing. Things like <this> with that summary could possibly indicate that though.
- At any rate, I've removed the 2 words I said was a pattern, as I suspect that might be a name.
- – 2804:F14:80B6:3101:94AC:3D6C:795E:EF8A (talk) 09:54, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
- Ok, thanks. I was out for three days so I did not get to see messages. -- Alexf(talk) 09:44, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
- Looks like they made an account Yusaya 4532. Was(is) reported at AIV because it was submitting drafts. Same general talk-page behaviour as the IPs. – 2804:F14:80B3:CB01:7580:2AB6:654D:D95B (talk) 14:38, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
- As the AIV reporter mentioned, this user also has an IPv6 (here's the </64>) - seemingly wasn't very active recently, except it was VERY active about a year ago, got a few blocks. Their behaviour has changed quite a bit, in that they were doing random stuff everywhere, not just their talk page, but still <some similarities> like that name, this time as the summary.
- I think it now seems safe to conclude that this is one person, not an entire school. – 2804:F14:80B3:CB01:7580:2AB6:654D:D95B (talk) 15:08, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
- Just an update, not that it made sense for me to keep bringing this to you, but for closure: This person is now globally locked, centred on Yusaya 4522, because at some point after making those initial accounts they made even more and did this in multiple wikis (or perhaps they already did this before in multiple wikis as IPs).
- Quite the escalation. – 2804:F14:80B3:CB01:BC7E:3A4B:5EFD:7ED5 (talk) 12:19, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
- Looks like they made an account Yusaya 4532. Was(is) reported at AIV because it was submitting drafts. Same general talk-page behaviour as the IPs. – 2804:F14:80B3:CB01:7580:2AB6:654D:D95B (talk) 14:38, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
- Ok, thanks. I was out for three days so I did not get to see messages. -- Alexf(talk) 09:44, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue 206, June 2023
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 18:29, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – July 2023
News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2023).
Administrator changes
Bureaucrat changes
Guideline and policy news
- Contributions to the English Wikipedia are now released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0) license instead of CC BY-SA 3.0. Contributions are still also released under the GFDL license.
Technical news
- Discussion is open regarding a proposed global policy regarding third-party resources. Third-party resources are computer resources that reside outside of Wikimedia production websites.
Arbitration
- Two arbitration cases are currently open. Proposed decisions are expected 5 July 2023 for the Scottywong case and 9 July 2023 for the AlisonW case.
The Bugle: Issue 207, July 2023
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 19:57, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
A cookie for you!
|
Thanks for welcoming me when I was new to the Wikipedia! :D ⌬ CH₃mificαtion! ⌬ 06:02, 20 July 2023 (UTC) |
The Bugle: Issue 208, August 2023
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:28, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – August 2023
News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2023).
Administrator changes
Interface administrator changes
Technical news
- The tag filter on Special:NewPages and revision history pages can now be inverted. This allows hiding edits made by automated tools. (T334338)
- Special:BlockedExternalDomains is a new tool that allows easier blocking of plain domains (and their subdomains). This is more easily searchable and is faster for the software to use than the existing MediaWiki:Spam-blacklist. It does not support regex (for complex cases), URL path-matching, or the MediaWiki:Spam-whitelist. (T337431)
Arbitration
- The arbitration cases named Scottywong and AlisonW closed 10 July and 16 July respectively.
- The SmallCat dispute arbitration case is in the workshop phase.
Junicode edit
Hi Alexf,
I do not understand the message you left me to the effect that you have removed an inappropriate link. First of all, you don't seem to have removed it.
If you do remove it, what will be the result? Will you restore the statement that the latest version of this font is 1.002, which has been inaccurate for nearly two years? The note on that statement linked to a place where one could download an obsolete version. Do you mean to restore that link?
It has been a frustration to me for (as I said) nearly two years that the Wikipedia entry for my font linked to an obsolete version. I was uncomfortable about correcting it myself, but I thought it less ethical to get someone to do it for me, or to do it anonymously, so after thinking about it for a long time I did it propria persona. When the message about conflicts of interest popped up, I read it. There was a great deal of talk there about trying to use Wikipedia to make a profit, which would obviously be unethical, but since Junicode is an Open Source project from which I have never made any money (well, someone many years ago left a $25 donation on the SourceForge site, but you know what I mean), and never expect to make any, I decided it was all right to update the entry.
I apologize if I was mistaken. But I would ask: what are you going to do? Restore the inaccurate information? Delete the whole entry (though Junicode is considered an important Open Source project)? Or simply remove the link so that your readers will be unable to find the resource the article is about?
I'll be interested to see what you decide.
Best wishes, Peter Psb1558 (talk) 23:09, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Psb1558: Peter. I understand your concern. First, the post has not been removed. The canned message said so in error, (used the wrong message). I cleared that. The point here is that you, with all good intentions of fixing an old entry, are posting to your own data, which is a sign of spamming your own work, and not viewed as acceptable in Wikipedia. -- Alexf(talk) 00:03, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
- I wasn't looking at it from that point of view, but I get it, and I will comply with your policy. Psb1558 (talk) 00:20, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
Assistance Request
Hello, I've been addressing fostered content issues on Wikipedia over the past month and there are now four remaining in usertalk space. One of these is on your User talk:Alexf/Archive 4. If you would be willing, would you replace the entire contents of the "Doczilla's RFA" section with the following code block to correct the syntax issues (one fostered content error, a table tag issue, two obsolete tags, three missing end tags, and three stripped tags)? While I'd normally make a smaller change X to Y in this sort of situation, this particular section had layered issues and it is just easier to fix the whole thing in one go.
Change to
|
|---|
{|
|<div class="NavFrame collapsed" style="border-style: none; padding: 0px;">
<div class="NavFrame collapsed" style="border-style: none; text-align: left; border: #dadada solid 2px; -moz-border-radius: 10px; background: #006400; padding: 5px;">
<div class="NavHead" style="-moz-border-radius-topright: 10px; -moz-border-radius-topleft: 10px; -moz-border-radius-bottomright: 10px; -moz-border-radius-bottomleft: 10px; background: #{{User:Doczilla/Color}}; text-align: center; padding: 2px; font-size: 160%;"><span style="font-family:trebuchet ms; color:#006400">.:[[Image:Nuvola apps cache.png|30px]] ''[[Spectres_%28album%29#Side_one|Oh, no! There goes To-ky-o! Admin Doczilla!]]'' [[Image:Nuvola apps cache.png|30px]]:.</span></div>
<div class="NavContent" style="background: none; text-align: center;">
{| class="wikitable"
|-
| align="left"|[[Image:Godzilla(01)reverse.jpg|275px|left]]
| align="center"|<span style="font-size:24px">'''Thanks for !voting!'''</span><br><br>
Thank you for !voting in [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Doczilla|my RfA]] which resulted in the collapse of civilization with '''92''' (94?) '''support''', '''1 oppose''', and '''1 neutral'''.<br> Blame [[User:jc37|jc37]] and [[User:Hiding|Hiding]] for nominating me, everyone who had questions or comments, everyone who !voted, everyone who tallied the numbers correctly, and [[User:WJBscribe|WJBScribe]] who closed<br> without shouting, "No mop for you!"
Seriously, your response has overwhelmed me.<br> I am deeply grateful.
| [[Image:Sts-67-patch.png|thumb|[[STS-67]] patch.
----
[[User:Alexf|Alexf]]<sup>[[User talk:Alexf|42]]<p> '''Thank you for casting the 67th vote in support'''</p></sup>|100px]]
|}
<div class="NavHead" style="-moz-border-radius-topright: 10px; -moz-border-radius-topleft: 10px; -moz-border-radius-bottomright: 10px; -moz-border-radius-bottomleft: 10px; background: #FFFFFF; text-align: left; padding: 2px; font-size: 100%;"><span style="color:#000000"> [[Image:Nuvola apps korganizer.png|30px]] ''"The bad news is time flies. The good news is you're the pilot."'' - Michael Althsuler </span></div>
{{#if: {{{1|}}}| {{User:1ne/Title{{!}}{{{1|}}}}}|}}
<span style="position:-40px;left:-180px;z-index:100"></span>
<div style="position:absolute; z-index:100; center:10px; :0px;" class="metadata" id="userGrmWnr">
{| style="background-color:#CFB53B;border: solid 2px #AA0000"
|-
|[[User:Doczilla|<span style="color:green;font-weight:bold;font-size:medium;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;">Doczilla</span>]] <sub>[[User talk:Doczilla|RAWR!]]</sub> 07:02, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
| <imagemap>Image:Nuvola filesystems folder home.png|30px|Home Page
default [[User:Doczilla|In lieu of applauding you, Doczilla stomps on a warehouse.]]
desc none</imagemap>
|<imagemap>Image:Nuvola_apps_chat.png|30px|Talk Page
default [[User_talk:Doczilla|What was that? I couldn't hear you over the crunch of that warehouse.]]
desc none</imagemap>
|<imagemap>Image:Laff alert.svg|30px|Joke Alert
default [http://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=User%3ADoczilla&diff=190347038&oldid=190345255 Oh, how quickly things change.]
desc none</imagemap>
|<imagemap>Image:Nuvola apps 3 cookie.png|30px|Presents
default [[User:Doczilla/RfAThanks|Hard to believe I really do have a great life with plenty of better things to do than excessively personalize these thank you notes.]]
desc none</imagemap>
|}</div></div></div></div>
|}
|
Thank you, and if you have any questions, let me know. Zinnober9 (talk) 15:58, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
- Done but there seems to be a missing image. -- Alexf(talk) 18:32, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
- The Godzilla reverse image? Yeah, that was removed from Wikipedia in 2011 for a possibly unfree file issue. Since red links/removed files aren't a WP:LINT issue and don't need to be fixed, I'm leaving that as it was.
- I didn't mean for "Change to" to be included within the change, but it isn't causing any issues.
- Thank you for your assistance! Zinnober9 (talk) 19:16, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
Moverspackersdirectories (talk · contribs)
Can you revert this user's page and revoke their talkpage access. I tried to post it to AIV, but the bot removed it because it thought that it was a comment underneath a different report. Thanks! 2601:1C0:4401:F60:6C1F:6C04:BDED:7E5B (talk) 17:57, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
Also, while I've got your attention, could you rev-del this as well. A very serious BLP violation. Thanks! 2601:1C0:4401:F60:6C1F:6C04:BDED:7E5B (talk) 18:07, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
Question
Hi, I've noticed on a few accounts where I've reverted spam and you've rev/del'ed some of them. Is this something I should be asking for when I revert? Or do you have a magic wand that conjures them up in a back room somewhere waiting to be banished into the ether? Just because I'm nosey. Thanks, Knitsey (talk) 11:05, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
- If it is blatant spam maybe you could ask, but we generally see them. A lot of people mistakenly try to spam their websites/blogs to increase traffic, or worse, they point to questionable sites. -- Alexf(talk) 11:10, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you. I've noticed most, but not all trip the edit filter. I've also managed to find a few adding 404 links which I presume some will pop up at some point as a spam link. Knitsey (talk) 11:14, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
Erroneous block
I believe you may have blocked Thambidhuraitd (talk) in error. The reason cited is username policy. "Thambidhurai" appears to be an actual Indian last name, you may have misread last three letters as "Ltd" and mistook it for a company name.
I have no connection to this user; only watching them due to two attempts at unsourced DoB change on a BLP − I reverted the first one. I also haven't seen any edits of a promotional nature from them, unless there's something that's been deleted and not visible to me.
Cheers, 2406:3003:2077:1E60:CEFF:5CDD:BBC4:2876 (talk) 04:39, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
- You are correct. That is what happened. Thanks.
Fixed -- Alexf(talk) 10:04, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Query
Hello, Alexf,
I noticed you blocked Nið ricsað and deleted several of their articles as hoaxes. To be honest, I wasn't sure, I don't know much about this subject area. Should their other article creations be deleted and their edits rolled back? Just wondering. Thanks, have a good week. Liz Read! Talk! 15:53, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
- Hi Liz. I looked into them and agreed with the poster, so I deleted. Should other contributions be reverted? I looked at some, and did not think so, so I did not remove/reverted them. Maybe someone else with more knowledge can comment. That is what I saw and understood. -- Alexf(talk) 16:43, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
- Okay, thank you for the assessment. I found a few of their edits were referring to the articles, now deleted, to legitimize them by writing them into the history of a location so I have reverted them. I'll look at a few more. Liz Read! Talk! 19:08, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – September 2023
News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2023).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- Following an RfC, TFAs will be automatically semi-protected the day before it is on the main page and through the day after.
- A discussion at WP:VPP about revision deletion and oversight for dead names found that
[s]ysops can choose to use revdel if, in their view, it's the right tool for this situation, and they need not default to oversight. But oversight could well be right where there's a particularly high risk to the person. Use your judgment
.
Technical news
- Special:Contributions now shows the user's local edit count and the account's creation date. (T324166)
Arbitration
- The SmallCat dispute case has closed. As part of the final decision, editors participating in XfD have been reminded to be careful about forming
local consensus which may or may not reflect the broader community consensus
. Regular closers of XfD forums were also encouraged tonote when broader community discussion, or changes to policies and guidelines, would be helpful
.
Miscellaneous
- Tech tip: The "Browse history interactively" banner shown at the top of Special:Diff can be used to easily look through a history, assemble composite diffs, or find out what archive something wound up in.
Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open
Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election have opened. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:04, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
User:Afsar80
Can you block this spambot? Thanks. 2601:601:51C:6A8:4D49:CA1F:3CB5:D334 (talk) 18:37, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
- Done - proper, and faster way is to report them to WP:AIV. -- Alexf(talk) 18:56, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue 209, September 2023
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 21:35, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
Previously blocked editor still not complying with site policies
In May, you blocked User:Lakearea270 after I reported them at WP:COIN for editing Lake Area Technical College. You unblocked them after they changed their name. They haven't edited again until today when they resumed editing the same article. They have already explicitly admitted that they have a paid editing relationship with the college but they haven't complied with any of the relevant policies and practices except the name change that was imposed by your block. I think they may need to be blocked again until they comply with WP:PAID. ElKevbo (talk) 23:49, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks for the heads up. User warned and watchlisted. -- Alexf(talk) 00:07, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
User:Univocracy
Hi!, I don't the block you just levied on the aforementioned user should be a soft block. Edit filters disallowed several very vulgar comments on my talk page after I U5'd their user page. Thanks Seawolf35 (talk) 00:33, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
- Had missed that. Changed the block. Unacceptable behavior. -- Alexf(talk) 00:54, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
Spam version-suppression
Hi, could you please justify your suppression from public view of a revision to List of breweries in California, Special:Diff/1175548828? On the one hand, I can see the justification for calling it spam and reverting the edit. But the sort of revision deletion that you performed goes well beyond that and typically only happens for copyvio or severe BLP violations. See WP:CRD for a list of valid revision deletion reasons. Which one of those do you think your spam-hiding revdel falls under? —David Eppstein (talk) 21:54, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
- Yes you have a point within the strict interpretation of the rules, but blatant spamming should not be allowed and their websites should not be open here for people to click, give them traffic or worse, get malicious code. -- Alexf(talk) 22:10, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
- That's what undo is for. It is not what revdel is for. —David Eppstein (talk) 22:22, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – September 2023
News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2023).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- An RfC is open regarding amending the paid-contribution disclosure policy to add the following text:
Any administrator soliciting clients for paid Wikipedia-related consulting or advising services not covered by other paid-contribution rules must disclose all clients on their userpage.
Technical news
- Administrators can now choose to add the user's user page to their watchlist when changing the usergroups for a user. This works both via Special:UserRights and via the API. (T272294)
Arbitration
Miscellaneous
- The 2023 CheckUser and Oversight appointments process has concluded with the appointment of one new CheckUser.
- Self-nominations for the electoral commission for the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections opens on 2 October and closes on 8 October.
The Bugle: Issue 210, October 2023
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 19:24, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
Softblock
Hi, Alexf. Was it your intention to merely softblock User:Paloma Sanchez The Art of Jewlery, with the Twinkle notification that tells them "Your username is the principal reason for the block" and explains how to immediately create a new account? They had posted an egregiously promotional userpage, as you know (you deleted it). I normally hardblock such accounts. (In this case it would be really easy for them to create a new account, too - all they'd have to do is correct the misspelling "Jewlery"!) Bishonen | tålk 08:13, 13 October 2023 (UTC).
- @Bishonen: Actually I debated on this one and maybe a soft heart won, so I did it like that on purpose. You do have a point. Changed. -- Alexf(talk) 10:56, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks, Alex. I thought all the classic phrasing ("beacon of innovation and creativity", "innate passion", "unparalleled craftsmanship", "wellspring of inspiration", "exquisite", etc etc) was itchingly painful. AI, maybe? Bishonen | tålk 11:17, 13 October 2023 (UTC).
Talk page access
Hi, I forgot to ask at AIV, Can you revoke talk page access as well please. I think we are supposed to ask, sorry about that. Knitsey (talk) 14:49, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
- Black Lives Matter and Transgenders are the real terrorists - Not Muslims. (talk · contribs) This might help lol. Knitsey (talk) 14:50, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Blocked user's new account
Hi, if there's a more proper channel to do this through, I apologize. A user you recently blocked (Special:Contributions/68.193.160.90) seems to be under a new account (Special:Contributions/Pultzser). They have a similar pattern of edits. If it is the same person, they are probably also Fourlaxers. - Hardkeyyy (talk) 19:02, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
- @Hardkeyyy: The place is at AIV or ANI if you want to get Admin attention. Writing to one person who may or may not be online for a while (esp if you read my notice above), might not get you fast results. -- Alexf(talk) 19:17, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks for pointing me in the right direction. - Hardkeyyy (talk) 19:34, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
You may wish to revoke TPA. Cahk (talk) 08:05, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
- @Cahk: Done -- Alexf(talk) 10:26, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
Second account from blocked user
Since you blocked User:09st0n3r45, can you please also block User:GCFG? Appears to be the same person who recreated an account (same vandalism style, same target page). ChaotıċEnby(talk) 18:55, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
Restoring Draft:SuperGears
Hello, I saw that you deleted the page Draft:SuperGears under CSD G11. Could you please restore it? I'm in the process of improving the article and rewriting it to avoid promotional sounding text. There are third party sources and I expect that the topic will gain even more news sources in the near future. -- Cosmic6811 🍁 (T · C) 18:28, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
- @Cosmic6811: Done, but you have to restart the article. It was declined as-is and had a conflict of interest. -- Alexf(talk) 18:37, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
- Got it -- Cosmic6811 🍁 (T · C) 18:38, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
Request for small translation
Hello, I noticed you have {{User es}} on your user page. Would you mind translating a few of the headers and contents of the table at Gran Premio del Sur? It was mindlessly copied from eswiki, but it shouldn't take that long to fix (for a native Spanish person at least). It should only take a few minutes at most. Thanks, — MATRIX! (a good person!)[citation unneeded] 19:19, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
- @Matrix: Done -- Alexf(talk) 20:50, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – November 2023
News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2023).
Administrator changes
Interface administrator changes
Guideline and policy news
Technical news
- The WMF is working on making it possible for administrators to edit MediaWiki configuration directly. This is similar to previous work on Special:EditGrowthConfig. A technical RfC is running until November 08, where you can provide feedback.
- There is a proposed plan for re-enabling the Graph Extension. Feedback on this proposal is requested.
Arbitration
- Eligible editors are invited to self-nominate themselves from 12 November 2023 until 21 November 2023 to stand in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections.
- Xaosflux, RoySmith and Cyberpower678 have been appointed to the Electoral Commission for the 2023 Arbitration Committee Elections. BusterD is the reserve commissioner.
- Following a motion, the contentious topic designation of Prem Rawat has been struck. Actions previously taken using this contentious topic designation are still in force.
- Following several motions, multiple topic areas are no longer designated as a contentious topic. These contentious topic designations were from the Editor conduct in e-cigs articles, Liancourt Rocks, Longevity, Medicine, September 11 conspiracy theories, and Shakespeare authorship question cases.
- Following a motion, remedies 3.1 (All related articles under 1RR whenever the dispute over naming is concerned), 6 (Stalemate resolution) and 30 (Administrative supervision) of the Macedonia 2 case have been rescinded.
- Following a motion, remedy 6 (One-revert rule) of the The Troubles case has been amended.
- An arbitration case named Industrial agriculture has been opened. Evidence submissions in this case close 8 November.
Miscellaneous
- The Articles for Creation backlog drive is happening in November 2023, with 700+ drafts pending reviews for in the last 4 months or so. In addition to the AfC participants, all administrators and New Page Patrollers can conduct reviews using the helper script, Yet Another AFC Helper Script, which can be enabled in the Gadgets settings. Sign up here to participate!
Unblock request
You have blocked the IP address 71.222.21.17 for "Repeatedly triggering the Edit filter". There is now an unblock request from this IP address at UTRS. I have checked the history, and it is clear that the editor was repeatedly trying to remove material which unambiguously contradicts what the cited source says. Also, as the IP editor correctly pointed out, the citation for the removed material says that the reference refers to Daviess County, Ohio whereas the article is about Daviess County, Indiana. In fact, the page linked by the reference does refer to Daviess County, Indiana, and "Ohio" was evidently either a mistake or vandalism. In any case, I see no reason to think that the IP editor was acting in good faith, and moreover as I have said the information does not agree with the cited source, so I can only see the block as a mistake. I am therefore very much inclined to accept the unblock request, but I am holding back in case you know of some relevant fact which I have missed, and which significantly changes the situation. I will be grateful if you will let me know. JBW (talk) 20:29, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
- @JBW: Ok. I see your point. It is a short-lived block but go ahead if you must. -- Alexf(talk) 20:44, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
- Yes, it is a short block, and for that reason I don't see it as mattering much either way, but I think there's a case for unblocking as a gesture to an editor who was acting in good faith, albeit making a mistake in one respect. Thanks for answering. JBW (talk) 21:09, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue 211, November 2023
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 18:17, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
About rename
Hi. The user who has been blocked by you Koliveira203 renamed. FYI, thanks. Vincent Vega mesaj? 00:16, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Precious anniversary
 | |
| Three years! |
|---|
Desert Hawk
May I ask why you reverted my citations? MrGreen1163 (talk) 01:41, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
- @MrGreen1163: Did not seem constructive, being from a Google archive. Fine, considering it is not clear, I restored it. -- Alexf(talk) 07:58, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
- My apologies if there was an issue accessing one of the citations, but thank you for restoring the internationally recognized result. Operation Desert Hawk was apart of the greater Rann of Kutch Conflict (Which I am planning to make an article on, and which I will include the ceasefire result), and the Rann of Kutch Conflict was apart of the greater Indo-Pakistani War of 1965. I greatly appreciate your cooperation in expanding this encyclopedia. MrGreen1163 (talk) 12:21, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Addition of okay(K) to tobi Lou’s Wikipedia page
okay(K) is featured with soundbwoy on the outro of delete my # baby on live on ice. Please add okay(K) back as a contributing artist to the project. The pitchfork article does not reference soundbwoy yet he is added as a contributing artist. I added additional references that shows okay(K) is featured on the project.
I added the SoundCloud link to tobi Lou’s official SoundCloud as a reference which shows that he is indeed on the album.
here is the link again for reference: https://on.soundcloud.com/vLjm3oRPYq5njCVG6 Okayksux (talk) 20:50, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
- Alexf: Normally I'd be reluctant to consider SoundCloud a reliable source, but in this case I think the WP:SELFSOURCE exception might apply. Thoughts? --Chris | Crazycomputers (talk) 20:58, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
- Well here are some other sources that shows okay(K) is featured on the album if ur still skeptical.
- Last.fm
- https://www.last.fm/music/tobi+lou/Live+on+Ice+%5BExplicit%5D
- Amazon
- https://www.amazon.com/Live-Ice-Tobi-Lou/dp/B07WNKVHTD
- Album of the year
- https://www.albumoftheyear.org/album/168380-tobi-lou-live-on-ice.php
- It’s also out on vinyl which sold out but is still available some places with okay(K) credited on the album and many people own that physical copy of the project. Okayksux (talk) 21:07, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
- Also while I’m here, can I get my own Wikipedia page for "okay(K)"? And if not, what do I need to do to get a hyperlink to my own Wikipedia page? Okayksux (talk) 21:21, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
- @Okayksux: What do you mean "your own page?" Are you a representative of okay(K)? --Chris | Crazycomputers (talk) 00:05, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
- Yes. I actually am the artist, okay(K). I just made a Wikipedia account Okayksux (talk) 00:06, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
- @Okayksux: What do you mean "your own page?" Are you a representative of okay(K)? --Chris | Crazycomputers (talk) 00:05, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
- Also while I’m here, can I get my own Wikipedia page for "okay(K)"? And if not, what do I need to do to get a hyperlink to my own Wikipedia page? Okayksux (talk) 21:21, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
- SoundCloud is not a reliable source. You should not write a page for yourself in an encyclopedia. Someone else might if you are notable and there are sufficient reliable sources. -- Alexf(talk) 17:01, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – December 2023
News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2023).
Administrator changes
Guideline and policy news
- Following a talk page discussion, the Administrators' accountability policy has been updated to note that while it is considered best practice for administrators to have notifications (pings) enabled, this is not mandatory. Administrators who do not use notifications are now strongly encouraged to indicate this on their user page.
Arbitration
- Following a motion, the Extended Confirmed Restriction has been amended, removing the allowance for non-extended-confirmed editors to post constructive comments on the "Talk:" namespace. Now, non-extended-confirmed editors may use the "Talk:" namespace solely to make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided that their actions are not disruptive.
- The Arbitration Committee has announced a call for Checkusers and Oversighters, stating that it will currently be accepting applications for CheckUser and/or Oversight permissions at any point in the year.
- Eligible users are invited to vote on candidates for the Arbitration Committee until 23:59 December 11, 2023 (UTC). Candidate statements can be seen here.
The Bugle: Issue 212, December 2023
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:59, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
Voting for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2023 is now open!
Voting is now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2023! The the top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki . Cast your votes vote here and here respectively. Voting closes at 23:59 on 30 December 2023. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. Hawkeye7 (talk · contribs) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:55, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
Your administrative actions on Power engineering software and User talk:XGSLab
Hi Alexf,
Just wanted to let you know I neglected to remove the link from the article when I was drive-by tagging, but that's been fixed now. However, there are also many other links to other companies which have also been removed. I noticed you struck the edit that added the link the first time, so you may want to strike my edit afterward as well. However, the cat might be out of the bag for all the other links. I'm not too sure what the rules and procedures are on your end.
Thanks, RetroCosmos (talk) 15:36, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
- @RetroCosmos: The one redacted was a spam-link. The others ones were reverted. That is enough. -- Alexf(talk) 18:51, 30 December 2023 (UTC)