User talk:Векочел/Archive 2

Archive 1

Archive 2

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:39, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

Milhist coordinator election voting has commenced

G'day everyone, voting for the 2019 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 03:37, 15 September 2019 (UTC)

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election half-way mark

G'day everyone, the voting for the XIX Coordinator Tranche is at the halfway mark. The candidates have answered various questions, and you can check them out to see why they are running and decide whether you support them. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 07:37, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

Talk:Mauricio Macri/GA2

Векочел, you opened your review over five weeks ago with the words Векочел, and haven't been back since. It seems likely that you forgot about it, hence this reminder.

Do you intend to begin reviewing this soon? If not, please let me know; I can arrange for the unused review page to be deleted and the nomination put back into the pool of unreviewed GANs with no loss in seniority. Thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 18:00, 18 August 2019 (UTC)

• BlueMoonset, I will review this within the next week. Векочел (talk) 18:17, 18 August 2019 (UTC)

• Great! Thanks for the quick response. BlueMoonset (talk) 20:21, 18 August 2019 (UTC)

• It looks like the nominator has stopped editing Wikipedia. Векочел (talk) 02:30, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

• Векочел, you still need to complete the review somehow. You could make a request at the Argentina WikiProject to see whether anyone would be willing to address the issues you'd inevitably raise during the course of a review, since this is an article on the president of that country, and if no one volunteers, close it then. Or you could preemptively close it now since your one request has not yet been answered and the nominator retired over six weeks ago. Thank you. BlueMoonset (talk) 17:09, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

Akane Yamaguchi

Hello. I know you're busy, sorry to bother. Can you take the time to copy editing for this article? I really need your help. Thanks you very much. Xecvws (talk) 09:42, 28 September 2019 (UTC)

barnstar

		El Jefe
		On behalf of myself, I extend congratulations on your selection to the ruling junta of Milhist and affirm my loyalty to it. Chetsford (talk) 01:04, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

Thank you Chetsford. Векочел (talk) 02:35, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

Congratulations!

		The Coordinator stars
		On behalf of the members of WikiProject Military history, in recognition of your election to the position of Coordinator, I take great pleasure in presenting you with the Coordinator's stars, and wish you the best luck in the coming year! Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 03:45, 29 September 2019 (UTC)

Welcome to the team! I'm glad to see you decided to run, and I'm looking forward to working with this coming year. TomStar81 (Talk) 07:20, 29 September 2019 (UTC)

• Yes TomStar81, I’m also looking forward to this year. I did not expect to be elected! Векочел (talk) 18:07, 29 September 2019 (UTC)

• Looking forward to work with you in the comming year. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 17:05, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

• I'm sure it will be an interesting year CPA-5. Векочел (talk) 17:53, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 29

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Henry I of England, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Louis VI (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:36, 29 October 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Please preview, consolidate, and summarize

Hello, Векочел- It looks like you are here to do good work and improve the encyclopedia, which I'm sure everyone appreciates. But this project is a collaboration, and when editors leave no edit summaries, it makes watching pages more tedious for the rest of the community. Below are a few editing suggestions to make it easier for you and others to collaborate on the encyclopedia. Please preview, consolidate, and summarize your edits:

• Try to consolidate your edits, at least at the section level, to avoid cluttering the page's edit history; this makes it easier for your fellow editors to understand your intentions, and makes it easier for those monitoring activity on the article.
  • The show preview button (beside the "publish changes" button) is helpful for this; use it to view your changes incrementally before finally saving the page once you're satisfied with your edits.
• Please remember to explain each edit with an edit summary (box above the "publish changes" button).

Thanks in advance for considering these suggestions. Eric ^talk 16:13, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
• Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.
  

Chetsford (talk) 03:57, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

December 2019

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

- MrX 🖋 13:14, 20 December 2019 (UTC)

Editing Donald Trump

Please observe the page restrictions on Donald Trump. Ignoring the big yellow box can result in you being blocked from editing or being topic banned. The restrictions say:

The following discretionary sanctions apply to all people who edit this article:

• You must not make more than one revert per 24 hours to this article.
• If an edit you make is reverted you must discuss on the talk page and wait 24 hours before reinstating your edit.

You violated both restrictions when you combined two different paragraphs into one.[1][2] Please don't do this again or you will be reported. - MrX 🖋 13:29, 20 December 2019 (UTC)

• • @MrX: My bad, but it’s Wikipedia policy to have no more than four paragraphs in the lede Векочел (talk) 05:14, 21 December 2019 (UTC)

Four paragraphs in the lead is a style guideline. It is not meant to be strictly adhered to. In fact, WP:LEAD calls it a rule of thumb. Combining unrelated topics in a single paragraph is not very good writing, but if it were, combining the first two paragraphs of the lead would make more sense. - MrX 🖋 13:04, 21 December 2019 (UTC)

Feliz Navidad!

Merry Christmas! Hope yours is joyful. TomStar81 (Talk) 00:02, 26 December 2019 (UTC)

Thank you very much TomStar81. I hope you’re also having a nice Christmas. Векочел (talk) 02:12, 26 December 2019 (UTC)

Annexation of the Leeward Islands

Happy holidays. Thank you for the help with reviewing Teriitaria II. I especially appreciate your help with summarizing the article since I struggle with summaries a lot of times. My next project is Annexation of the Leeward Islands. Would you mind taking a look at it and helping me with the summary as well? Thanks. KAVEBEAR (talk) 06:52, 26 December 2019 (UTC)

• Sure, I’ll look at it shortly Векочел (talk) 23:27, 26 December 2019 (UTC)

Congratulations from the Military History Project

		Military history reviewers' award
		On behalf of the Military History Project, I am proud to present the The Milhist reviewing award (1 stripe) for participating in 3 reviews between October and December 2019. Peacemaker67 (talk) via MilHistBot (talk) 00:31, 11 January 2020 (UTC) Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste {{WPMILHIST Review alerts}} to your user space

• Thank you Peacemaker67! Векочел (talk) 03:20, 11 January 2020 (UTC)

Congratulations from the Military History Project

		Military history reviewers' award
		On behalf of the Military History Project, I am proud to present the The Milhist reviewing award (1 stripe) for participating in 3 reviews between October and December 2019. Peacemaker67 (talk) via MilHistBot (talk) 00:31, 12 January 2020 (UTC) Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste {{WPMILHIST Review alerts}} to your user space

February 2020

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Edward III of England. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. This encyclopedia is a collaboration. Please discuss differences with other editors. And, once again, please use edit summaries to explain your edits. Eric ^talk 16:03, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

March Madness 2020

G'day all, March Madness 2020 is about to get underway, and there is bling aplenty for those who want to get stuck into the backlog by way of tagging, assessing, updating, adding or improving resources and creating articles. If you haven't already signed up to participate, why not? The more the merrier! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:19, 29 February 2020 (UTC) for the coord team

Disambiguation link notification for March 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Eduard, Prince of Anhalt, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ascania (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:48, 26 March 2020 (UTC)

DYK courtesy notice

Hello! Your submission of Tariq bin Taimur at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! I think the fact is very strong and definitely belongs at DYK, I just raise a specific WP:V concern with the lack of in-line citations that I don't think will take much effort to clear up. - Astrophobe (talk) 04:51, 28 March 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Akihito, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shōwa (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:55, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mother Teresa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mother Superior (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:07, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

Diana, Princess of Wales

Hi Векочел, you are invited to join a discussion regarding the lede sentence of the article Diana, Princess of Wales, on the talk page (here). Thank you, cookie monster (2020) 755 03:11, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

Diana, Princess of Wales again

Hi Векочел, there was clear consensus on the talk page of Diana, Princess of Wales, regarding what the lede sentence should read. Please do not change it again without consensus on the talk page. Sincerely, cookie monster (2020) 755 01:23, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 29

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Erasmus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Christian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:18, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:07, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for nominating again, Векочел! Could you add answers to the two questions as well please? Thanks, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:22, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

Milhist coordinator election voting has commenced

G'day everyone, voting for the 2020 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2020. Thanks from the outgoing coord team, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 05:18, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

Discussion at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2020 September 15 § Template:Use shortened footnotes

 You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2020 September 15 § Template:Use shortened footnotes. Peaceray (talk) 05:32, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

Congratulations from the Military History Project

		Military history reviewers' award
		On behalf of the Military History Project, I am proud to present the The Milhist reviewing award (1 stripe) for participating in 2 reviews between July and September 2020. Harrias (talk) via MilHistBot (talk) 05:26, 7 October 2020 (UTC) Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste {{WPMILHIST Review alerts}} to your user space

Disambiguation link notification for October 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nawwaf bin Abdulaziz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page King Abdullah.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:16, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:50, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Otto von Bismarck

We know that the picture is of Bismarck, since the article is called Otto von Bismarck, the lede sentence of the article says "Otto Eduard Leopold, Prince of Bismarck, Duke of Lauenburg (born von Bismarck-Schönhausen; German: Otto Eduard Leopold Fürst von Bismarck, Herzog zu Lauenburg; 1 April 1815 – 30 July 1898), known as Otto von Bismarck (German: [ˈɔto fɔn ˈbɪsmaʁk] )...", and the infobox itself says Otto von Bismarck. There is no need to further identify him in the caption to the image. Please stop.

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Otto von Bismarck; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Beyond My Ken (talk) 19:44, 26 November 2020 (UTC)

Discussion

• You continue to change the title of the infobox without a WP:CONSENSUS to do so. I have restored the 16-year WP:STATUSQUO title, and started a consensus discussion on the talk page. Do not change the title agaiin without a consensus to do so. The discussion is at Talk:Otto von Bismarck#Infobox title. Beyond My Ken (talk) 23:46, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

December 2020

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Kingdom of France does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

• User contributions
• Recent changes
• Watchlists
• Revision diffs
• IRC channels
• Related changes
• New pages list
• Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. ...once again... Eric ^talk 02:23, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

Nominations for the 2020 Military history WikiProject Newcomer and Historian of the Year awards now open

G'day all, the nominations for the 2020 Military history WikiProject newcomer and Historian of the Year are open, all editors are encouraged to nominate candidates for the awards before until 23:59 (GMT) on 15 December 2020, after which voting will occur for 14 days. There is not much time left to nominate worthy recipients, so get to it! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 06:46, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

Moves

How do you make decisions like "not needed" when moving the articles about the members of the Al Saud family? You put notice in some talk pages to call for moves arguing that most of these articles are without their surnames, Al Saud. But when I reviewed the past edits on these articles I have seen that you moved them in June 2020 deleting their surnames, Al Saud.

Please do not move these articles deleting the Al Saud part. If you read news or scientific articles or books on these people, their surnames are used there. In short, your moves will be reverted. In addition, instead of wasting your time to do what you want, you may consider to expand articles using reliable sources. --Egeymi (talk) 15:06, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

• Egeymi, from what I can find actually, much of the time the surname is omitted. For instance, a quick search on Prince Muhammad bin Nayef turned up the following:

Mohammed bin Nayef threatened by social media campaign, say Saudi prince's lawyers

In the bitter struggle for Saudi rule, Prince Mohammed bin Salman has struck first

The dazzling rise and tragic fall of Saudi Arabia’s Mohammed bin Nayef

This reflects the general practice of leaving out royal surnames. We generally hear in the news descriptions of Queen Elizabeth II and not Elizabeth Windsor, Mohammed bin Salman (or MBS) and not Mohammed Al Saud, Sultan Qaboos of Oman and not Qaboos Al Said, etc. Also WP:Naming conventions (royalty and nobility)#Other royals states Do not use surnames in article titles for such persons. If royals have surnames, then this information should be mentioned in the first line of the article (but care should be taken, as many do not have surnames, and personal surnames may differ from the name of their Royal House). Векочел (talk) 20:30, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

Are you trying to have edit wars?

You argued that capitals should be used giving MOS:JOBTITLE, then read it carefully. Hope you will consider to expand the articles instead of doing such things.

Positions, offices, and occupational titles

Offices, titles, and positions such as president, king, emperor, grand duke, lord mayor, pope, bishop, abbot, prime minister, chief financial officer, and executive director are common nouns and therefore should be in lower case when used generically: Mitterrand was the French president or There were many presidents at the meeting. They are capitalized only in the following cases:

When followed by a person's name to form a title, i.e., when they can be considered to have become part of the name: President Nixon, not president Nixon When a title is used to refer to a specific person as a substitute for their name during their time in office, e.g., the Queen, not the queen (referring to Elizabeth II)

Therefore,

Muḥammad bin Nāyif bin ‘Abd al-‘Azīz Āl Su‘ūd; born 30 August 1959) was Crown Prince of Saudi Arabia and first deputy prime minister from 2015 to 2017 and minister of interior from 2012 to 2017.

should be used given that no title follows the name like in the example, Mitterrand was the French president.

Hope you can get it. --Egeymi (talk) 12:09, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

• There is one additional case where the title is capitalized that you left off:

When a formal title for a specific entity (or conventional translation thereof) is addressed as a title or position in and of itself, is not plural, is not preceded by a modifier (including a definite or indefinite article), and is not a reworded description:

Crown prince is certainly a title, it is not plural, it is not preceded by a modifier (he is not called “a crown prince of Saudi Arabia”, and not a reworded description (we use the exact title) Векочел (talk) 18:26, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

I think you do not want to read carefully or to understand. Your edits will be corrected. Egeymi (talk) 07:56, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

Voting for "Military Historian of the Year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" closing

G'day all, voting for the WikiProject Military history "Military Historian of the Year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" is about to close, so if you haven't already, click on the links and have your say before 23:59 (GMT) on 30 December! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 23:35, 28 December 2020 (UTC) for the coord team

Carabus azrael moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Carabus azrael, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hitro talk 07:24, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

Carabus aurocinctus moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Carabus aurocinctus, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hitro talk 07:25, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

Carabus aumonti moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Carabus aumonti, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hitro talk 07:25, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Векочел

Thank you for creating Carabus abbreviatus.

User:Hughesdarren, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hi Nice work on the article but you must include a citation for what you have written, I have added one to this article but you should be doing the same for any other articles you add.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Hughesdarren}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Hughesdarren (talk) 09:20, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Векочел

Thank you for creating Carabus adamsi.

User:Hughesdarren, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Again nice work but must include references

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Hughesdarren}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Hughesdarren (talk) 09:26, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Векочел

Thank you for creating Carabus acutithorax.

User:Hughesdarren, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Please include references in future articles

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Hughesdarren}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Hughesdarren (talk) 09:36, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Векочел

Thank you for creating Carabus acorep.

User:Hughesdarren, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Please include references in future articles

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Hughesdarren}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Hughesdarren (talk) 09:41, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Векочел

Thank you for creating Carabus achilleanus.

User:Hughesdarren, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Please include references in future articles

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Hughesdarren}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Hughesdarren (talk) 09:54, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Векочел

Thank you for creating Carabus absonus.

User:Hughesdarren, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Please include references in future articles

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Hughesdarren}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Hughesdarren (talk) 10:03, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Векочел

Thank you for creating Carabus adangensis.

User:Hughesdarren, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Please include references in future articles

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Hughesdarren}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Hughesdarren (talk) 10:10, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

Carabus biroi moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Carabus biroi, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:45, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

Carabus aulacocnemus moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Carabus aulacocnemus, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:46, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

Referencing

Please stop creating new articles without proper sourcing. I've moved a bunch of yours to draft so you can work on them there. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:48, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

Don’t change please

Don’t change king of Saudi Arabia Salman. Al-Ghadouri (talk) 01:58, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 5

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Basic Law of Saudi Arabia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sunna.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:25, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

Edit summaries, please

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. Eric ^talk 04:10, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Juana Enríquez, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Castile.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:28, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Your page moves of Sultan bin Abdulaziz and Nayef bin Abdulaziz

I have reverted your page moves of Sultan bin Abdulaziz and Nayef bin Abdulaziz per a request made to WP:RMTR (Old revision of WP:RMTR), as well as the most recent WP:RM at Talk:Nayef bin Abdulaziz, Crown Prince of Saudi Arabia#Requested_move_18_November_2020. Looking at the page history, I can see that you've reverted it once before already. Please do not move it back without a discussion through the WP:RM process. If you continue to edit war through page moving, you're likely to be blocked. OhKayeSierra (talk) 16:24, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Saud bin Faisal bin Abdulaziz Al Saud, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Iranians.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:15, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive

Hey y'all, the April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive begins at 00:01 UTC on April 1, 2021 and runs through 23:59 UTC on April 31, 2021. Points can be earned through reviewing articles on the AutoCheck report, reviewing articles listed at WP:MILHIST/ASSESS, reviewing MILHIST-tagged articles at WP:GAN or WP:FAC, and reviewing articles submitted at WP:MILHIST/ACR. Service awards and barnstars are given for set points thresholds, and the top three finishers will receive further awards. To participate, sign up at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Military_History/April 2021 Reviewing Drive#Participants and create a worklist at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/April 2021 Reviewing Drive/Worklists (examples are given). Further details can be found at the drive page. Questions can be asked at the drive talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:27, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Haifa bint Faisal Al Saud, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Saud bin Faisal.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

Names

Hi, the links you put refer to others, but the parameter reads names, hope I can tell my point --Egeymi (talk) 20:23, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

• Egeymi, I thought it might be helpful to the reader to have links to their ancestors, at least for the grandfathers and for the lessser known royals the great grandfathers. Векочел (talk) 21:15, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

Question

Hii, everyday you are inserting wls or others to the infoboxes. Honestly I wonder if you are planning to add content to the articles using reliable sources.

And are you considering to look at the past actions made on the articles before inserting such wls or parameters. --Egeymi (talk) 10:30, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

• If I see anything good in the sources I have access to, I will add it. Now to answer your second question, the religion parameter has been kept with royalty. In the description under the infobox royalty template, there is a message that says while the religion parameter has been eliminated in other templates, it is kept in the royalty template because religion is often important to their rule. And it is in use in some articles. Векочел (talk) 14:40, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

Edit summaries ...

Please use them. You've been here long enough and been asked often enough. Ealdgyth (talk) 12:06, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

Edit summaries, again...

Hi Векочел, please start using edit summaries as a part of your work here. I just spent time providing a link to the talk-page of the editor who added the "Pharaoh" title to the infobox at Augustus, to justify your change. That should not have been necessary. Cheers, Haploidavey (talk) 07:52, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

• Thank you, Haploidavey. As you say, I do need to use them and will start doing so. Thanks. Векочел (talk) 08:00, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
  • I do hope so! You evidently know what you're doing, but the flaws in that Pharoah business won't be obvious to most. Regards Haploidavey (talk) 08:06, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Empire of Japan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Unitary.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Caregory:Sons of kings of Saudi Arabia

Hello Векочел,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Joseywales1961, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged an article that you started, Caregory:Sons of kings of Saudi Arabia, for deletion, because there's already a page about that topic at Category:Sons of kings of Saudi Arabia. Please don't be discouraged; we appreciate your effort in creating new articles. To avoid this in the future, consider using the search function to find pages that already cover what you want to write about.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Joseywales1961}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

(Presumably a typo in creating a category)

JW 1961 ^Talk 16:55, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Carabus aurocinctus

Hello, Векочел. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Carabus aurocinctus, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:02, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Carabus aumonti

Hello, Векочел. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Carabus aumonti, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:02, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Carabus aulacocnemus

Hello, Векочел. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Carabus aulacocnemus, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:02, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Carabus adolescens

Hello, Векочел. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Carabus adolescens, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:02, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Carabus aeneocupreus

Hello, Векочел. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Carabus aeneocupreus, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:02, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Carabus aeneolus

Hello, Векочел. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Carabus aeneolus, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:02, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Carabus aeruginosus

Hello, Векочел. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Carabus aeruginosus, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:02, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Carabus alagoensoides

Hello, Векочел. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Carabus alagoensoides, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:02, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Carabus alanstivelli

Hello, Векочел. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Carabus alanstivelli, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:03, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Carabus aliai

Hello, Векочел. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Carabus aliai, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:03, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Carabus alexpuchneri

Hello, Векочел. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Carabus alexpuchneri, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:03, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Carabus alpestris

Hello, Векочел. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Carabus alpestris, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:03, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Carabus amauryi

Hello, Векочел. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Carabus amauryi, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:03, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Carabus anami

Hello, Векочел. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Carabus anami, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:03, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Carabus anchocephalus

Hello, Векочел. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Carabus anchocephalus, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:04, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Carabus andreiianus

Hello, Векочел. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Carabus andreiianus, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:04, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Carabus andronnensis

Hello, Векочел. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Carabus andronnensis, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:04, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Carabus angermaieri

Hello, Векочел. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Carabus angermaieri, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:04, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Carabus angulihabitus

Hello, Векочел. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Carabus angulihabitus, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:04, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Carabus anhuinus

Hello, Векочел. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Carabus anhuinus, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:04, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Carabus angustus

Hello, Векочел. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Carabus angustus, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:05, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Carabus anlongensis

Hello, Векочел. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Carabus anlongensis, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:05, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Carabus annae

Hello, Векочел. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Carabus annae, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:05, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Carabus antoniettae

Hello, Векочел. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Carabus antoniettae, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:05, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Carabus anxiensis

Hello, Векочел. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Carabus anxiensis, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:05, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Carabus apschuanus

Hello, Векочел. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Carabus apschuanus, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:05, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Carabus arboreus

Hello, Векочел. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Carabus arboreus, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:06, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Carabus apollo

Hello, Векочел. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Carabus apollo, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:06, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Carabus arcadicus

Hello, Векочел. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Carabus arcadicus, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:06, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Carabus arcanus

Hello, Векочел. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Carabus arcanus, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:06, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Carabus armiger

Hello, Векочел. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Carabus armiger, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:06, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Carabus aristochroides

Hello, Векочел. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Carabus aristochroides, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:06, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Carabus argonautarum

Hello, Векочел. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Carabus argonautarum, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:07, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Carabus armeniacus

Hello, Векочел. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Carabus armeniacus, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:07, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Carabus arrowi

Hello, Векочел. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Carabus arrowi, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:07, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Carabus arraizensis

Hello, Векочел. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Carabus arraizensis, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:07, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Carabus auritus

Hello, Векочел. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Carabus auritus, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:07, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Carabus arshanicus

Hello, Векочел. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Carabus arshanicus, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:08, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Carabus arrowianus

Hello, Векочел. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Carabus arrowianus, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:08, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Carabus artemis

Hello, Векочел. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Carabus artemis, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:08, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Carabus arunensis

Hello, Векочел. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Carabus arunensis, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:08, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Carabus ascendens

Hello, Векочел. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Carabus ascendens, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:08, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Carabus asperatus

Hello, Векочел. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Carabus asperatus, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:09, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Carabus augustus

Hello, Векочел. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Carabus augustus, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:09, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 6

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Abraham Lincoln, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Democratic Party.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

Madawi al-Rasheed revert

Hi Векочел, my apologies for the revert on the edit you made to the Madawi al-Rasheed page. I was distracted and didn't look at the changes you made carefully enough. Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 13:56, 10 June 2021 (UTC)

Revirvlkodlaku, its ok, don't worry about it Векочел (talk) 20:14, 10 June 2021 (UTC)

June 2021

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

• User contributions
• Recent changes
• Watchlists
• Revision diffs
• IRC channels
• Related changes
• New pages list
• Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks!--Renat 23:27, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

Hellenistic royal epithets

Hope all is going well; I saw that you took all the royal epithets out of Ptolemy II. I admit that it's a very minor matter, but I thought I would say that I think it is better to keep them in. It's pretty standard in modern works to refer to the Hellenistic monarchs by them and useful because many works either refer to monarchs by epithets without ordinal numbers or (in the case of the Ptolemies) use different ordinals. Ancient works, of course, never use the ordinals. Furius (talk) 18:08, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

• Furius, a lot of later Hellenistic monarchs, Egyptian and Seleucid are referenced without using the ordinals, of course including the famous Cleopatra. And also there is not always consistency in the names. For instance, Ptolemy VIII Physcon is also known as Ptolemy Euergetes, and that is also the name of his ancestor Ptolemy III! I am of the opinion that the numbering is the most reliable way to go about this. Векочел (talk) 03:04, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

• Yes, but that's why it is good to use both. Either one on its own is less helpful. In the articles for English royals, lists of monarchs' issue usually includes titles, e.g Charles I of England#Issue. Furius (talk) 20:02, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
  • The example you give uses princes and princesses, which is not exactly the same as kings and queens. And the title may be used on the article name but very little in the article itself. I would not expect to see "Prince Andrew, Duke of York", just Andrew. And to give another example Catherine the Great is not called by her title throughout the article, but rather simply Catherine. Векочел (talk) 03:31, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ptolemy III Euergetes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cyrene.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

Moving articles against talk page consensus

Please do not move a page to a title that is harder to follow, or move it unilaterally against naming conventions or consensus. This includes making page moves while a discussion remains underway. We have some guidelines to help with deciding what title is best for a subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Thank you. Celia Homeford (talk) 12:25, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

July 2021

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Wilhelm II, German Emperor does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

• User contributions
• Recent changes
• Watchlists
• Revision diffs
• IRC channels
• Related changes
• New pages list
• Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! --Renat 21:25, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 11

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Abdul Muhsin bin Abdulaziz Al Saud, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Medina Province.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 11 August 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Faisal of Saudi Arabia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Palestine.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	hi Lim1345 (talk) 01:27, 19 August 2021 (UTC)

• Thank you so much Lim1345 for your thoughtful barnstar. Векочел (talk) 04:46, 28 August 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Philippe II, Duke of Orléans, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Madame.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 30 August 2021 (UTC)

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:59, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nomination period closing soon

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are still open, but not for long. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! No further nominations will be accepted after that time. Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:43, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

WikiProject Military history coordinator election voting has commenced

Hey y'all, voting for the 2021 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2021. Voting will be conducted at the 2021 tranche page itself. Appropriate questions for the candidates can also be asked. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:41, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election voting period closing soon

Hey y'all, voting for the 2021 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche will be closing soon. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2021. Voting will be conducted at the 2021 tranche page itself. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:34, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

Sorry for reverting your Mohammad edit, in error

Force of habit. Dushan Jugum (talk) 20:18, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

It is ok...thanks! Векочел (talk) 00:55, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

Invitation to the Roman and Byzantine emperors WikiProject

Hey Векочел,

Based on your work on pages like Pertinax and Julia Domna, I thought you might be interested in the Roman and Byzantine emperors WikiProject in the works. Thank you for your effort, regardless of if you'd like to join! Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 16:32, 1 October 2021 (UTC)

Elizabeth II

Hi there,

Unfortunately I had to revert your recent edit to this article. I have listed the reason in my edit summary. Additionally it was not explained why you removed a language template and reference to NI.

Let me know if you want to discuss, Cheers

AussieWikiDan ^(talk) 04:52, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

Salman of Saudi Arabia

As a reigning king by nature is a statesman and political leader I had to revert your edit. Thanks for you understanding.-- Dewritech (talk) 14:45, 15 October 2021 (UTC)

Nero and Agrippina

Thanks for catching that! It's not the first dreadful goof... your care is much appreciated. Haploidavey (talk) 04:32, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

• Your welcome...I saw that it said Nero was son of the Elder, so I felt I had to fix that. Векочел (talk) 04:54, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

The Honourable

Can you explain what you are doing with your edits to Australian politicians three days ago? You seem to have started removing the honorific "The Honourable" for a number of former prime ministers (which was incorrect), and others like Bob Cotton with the comment "Use of Honourable is similar to that of American politicians" (also incorrect). You did raise it on Talk:Alfred Deakin and the situation was explained, then you started adding "The Honourable" to a number of politicians who were never ministers. The correct usage is explained at The Honourable#Australia, but the short version is that ministers (including the prime minister) serving on the Executive Council are granted the honorific "The Honourable". For federal ministers and ministers in the state of Victoria, the honorific is retained for life, and unlike US politicians it is widely used thereafter in even semi-formal cases. Other Australian states have different arrangements and can grant use of the title for life but generally it is lost when they are no longer a minister. I'm going to revert these edits, which will unfortunately remove the other fixes you did such as removing blank infobox fields and overlinking, but please be more careful about this—the WP:AUSPOL community knows a lot about this sort of stuff and knows what they're doing with title styles and the like. Thanks. --Canley (talk) 10:40, 2 November 2021 (UTC)

Sorry, my mistake, I realised these were in the first federal parliament, my apologies. --Canley (talk) 10:47, 2 November 2021 (UTC)

However, please put a suitable edit summary when you make edits like this, such as "Entitled to Honourable honorific as member of the first parliament", rather than "ce to lede" or no summary/explanation at all. --Canley (talk) 10:49, 2 November 2021 (UTC)

Thanks, I will be sure to provide a better explanation. Векочел (talk) 16:33, 2 November 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mary II of England, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Queen of England.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

Rollback granted

Hi Векочел. After reviewing your request, I have temporarily enabled rollback on your account until {{{expiry}}}. Keep in mind these things when using rollback:

• Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
• Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
• Rollback should never be used to edit war.
• If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
• Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! The Wordsmith^{Talk to me} 17:29, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited William Hartnoll, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Frederick Piesse.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Title

May I ask. Why did you remove all my edits? Orson12345 (talk) 21:09, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

• We don't usually use the title Majesty in infoboxes. To insert the title across hundreds of articles would require a WP:RFC. Personally I see no need for the title, why state the obvious and say a king has the title almost universally used by kings or an emperor has the title used by emperors? In the rare case a royal uses a unique title, that title could be added but that should be decided on a case-by-case basis. Векочел (talk) 00:31, 25 November 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Élisabeth of France, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Madame.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

December 2021

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Jalaun, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 18:35, 12 December 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Umri, Jalaun, you may be blocked from editing. - Arjayay (talk) 18:37, 12 December 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Rampura, Jalaun. - Arjayay (talk) 18:38, 12 December 2021 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Orai, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - Arjayay (talk) 18:39, 12 December 2021 (UTC)

• Arjayay, the edits on the Indian cities were removing unused parameters from the template. If they are not being used to give info about their articles, then they are really just clutter. The article on Osman II describes him as a caliph, whereas it is redundant to say so because Ottoman sultans are caliphs anyways. I have been editing on this wiki for 4 years, this is the first time someone accuses me of vandalism. Векочел (talk) 22:55, 12 December 2021 (UTC)

NO, unused parameters are not "clutter", as they do not appear in the article itself. They are just currently unused parameters that provide reminders of, and a template for, additional information which can/should be added.
Deleting them means that an editor may not add useful information, or that they have to go to the template page to retrieve the deleted parameters, or, very frequently, that they guess the missing parameters, and fill the template up with unsupported infobox parameters. As a general rule, please do not make edits that do not alter the appearance of the rendered page; although there are exceptions, such as hidden text. - Arjayay (talk) 10:23, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

Please act responsible

One year ago you invented something with no basis and applied it without fully following the rules and moved articles for Al Saud family members. And today beacuse of your unnecessary moves all articles are again moved without the Al Saud. So please think before you do something. --Egeymi (talk) 11:53, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

Al Saud

Hi Векочел

I'm curious why you have proposed the opposite move to the one you made last year, at Talk:Nayef bin Abdulaziz? The correct form of this name according to Wikipedia policies is to omit "Al Saud" from the end, as the WP:COMMONNAME in reliable sources more often omits it than includes it, and the shorter form is also more WP:CONCISE. The RM last year concluded that "Al Saud" should be removed, and all similar articles should also have it removed for consistency with that decision. Thanks  — Amakuru (talk) 10:36, 19 December 2021 (UTC)

See this ngram for evidence of common name. The version without "Al Saud" on the end has around 8 times as many occurrences in book sources as the version which includes it.  — Amakuru (talk) 10:38, 19 December 2021 (UTC)

• I believe my initial judgement was wrong, there are a lot of Saudi royals and almost all have their surname in their article title. Векочел (talk) 00:09, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

  That doesn't matter though. What matters is Wikipedia policy and what is commonly reported in reliable sources. After the successful move last year, we should have moved other articles to follow suit. Consistency is good, and we can achieve it if we move all the other articles, but as I say it should be consistency that reflects the real world usage, as determined by sources, not just inserting extra words for the sake of it.  — Amakuru (talk) 10:56, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

  See also your own comment here: [3] - this specifically addresses why the shorter names are correct according to policy, now you're saying your "initial judgement was wrong"? No, that was entirely the correct judgement, and I'm unclear why you'd now argue against policy. Thanks  — Amakuru (talk) 10:59, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

  My judgement was wrong because a convention has developed to use "Al Saud" for the Saudi royals, to not use the surname for Omani royals, to use it again in Kuwait, etc. Векочел (talk) 14:30, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 21

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Edward VI, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Communion.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ælfthryth (wife of Edgar), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Crowned.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

Isabella of Portugal

You should open an RM for Isabella of Portugal (disambiguation) to Isabella of Portugal. We generally don't disambiguate titles just for the sake of it. Srnec (talk) 01:51, 3 February 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John V of Portugal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Benedict XIII.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 18 February 2022 (UTC)

Succession to the Italian throne moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Succession to the Italian throne, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 22:02, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 28

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Anne Lennard, Countess of Sussex

added a link pointing to Charles II

James Scott, Duke of Monmouth

added a link pointing to Beheaded

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Philippe II, Duke of Orléans, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Madame.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Mahathir Mohamad timeline

Template:Mahathir Mohamad timeline has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:58, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Louise Françoise, Princess of Condé, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Godmother.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

May 2022

Hello, I'm Sumanuil. An edit that you recently made to Ptolemy XII Auletes seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Sumanuil. 01:48, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 21

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Princess Victoria Adelaide of Schleswig-Holstein, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Duchess of Albany.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

June 2022 Good Article Nominations backlog drive

Good article nominations | June 2022 Backlog Drive

On 1 June, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number and age of articles reviewed. Interested in taking part? Sign up here!

You're receiving this message because you have conducted 5+ good article reviews or participated in previous backlog drives. Click here to opt out of any future messages. (t · c) buidhe 04:27, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

Ptolemies' epithets

I see that you've been working on the articles on the Ptolemies lately. In almost every way, I think what you are doing is excellent, so of course I'm writing to raise the one small thing that I'm less keen on, which is the removal of epithets. At times, I think removing the epithets makes it more difficult to read the text, since one is confronted with a mess of VIs, VIIIs, IXs, etc. which all look visually quite similar. So, I'd ask you to reconsider removing them as a default. As I say, it's just a small point and I'm genuinely just raising it as a point of view, not insisting that you agree. Thanks! Furius (talk) 21:29, 10 June 2022 (UTC)

• It's confusing regardless of what system you use. If it's better to use epithets for the Ptolemies, then we will run into Ptolemy I Soter and Ptolemy IX Soter. It's confusing to give so many French kings the name Louis or in Britain to have two contemporary monarchs called Queen Elizabeth. I don't think that this issue is something unique to the Ptolemies. Векочел (talk) 15:15, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Succession to the Italian throne

Hello, Векочел. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Succession to the Italian throne, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:03, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Succession to the Italian throne

Hello, Векочел. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Succession to the Italian throne".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:01, 19 August 2022 (UTC)

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations opening soon

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are opening in a few hours (00:01 UTC on 1 September). A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:52, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

September 2022

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Elizabeth II, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. General Ization ^Talk 02:43, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election voting opening soon!

Voting for the upcoming project coordinator election opens in a few hours (00:01 UTC on 15 September) and will last through 23:59 on 28 September. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. Voting is conducted using simple approval voting and questions for the candidates are welcome. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:27, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

Correction to previous election announcement

Just a quick correction to the prior message about the 2022 MILHIST coordinator election! I (Hog Farm) didn't proofread the message well enough and left out a link to the election page itself in this message. The voting will occur here; sorry about the need for a second message and the inadvertent omission from the prior one. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:42, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election voting closing soon

Voting for the upcoming project coordinator election closes soon, at 23:59 on 28 September. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. Voting is conducted using simple approval voting and questions for the candidates are welcome. The voting itself is occurring here If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:14, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Family tree of Faisal of Saudi Arabia

Template:Family tree of Faisal of Saudi Arabia has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:18, 23 October 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Abu Dhiba, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Medina Province.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 21

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Philip V of France, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Louis X.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 31

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sophia of Prussia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Greek Church.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 31 December 2022 (UTC)

Japanese Emperors

I'm not sure why you are removing the link to the table of spouses in the articles. These early Japanese Emperors had only one spouse and the rest were concubines, by definition here is the difference:

Concubinage is an interpersonal and sexual relationship between a man and a woman in which the couple does not want, or cannot enter into a full marriage.

A spouse is a significant other in a marriage.

The other think I took issue was with your removal of "Shinto" as a practicing religion. This is documented in the "Kiki" that the Early Emperors adhered to the Shinto religion. Legendary or not, if we were to go with the context I feel we should add the religion. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 22:20, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

We can keep the religion if they are so strongly associated with Shinto, but the emperors strictly had only the empresses as their spouses and the infobox can get cluttered by listing all the concubines. Векочел (talk) 22:30, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

(ec) My apologies, most of the edits you did were helpful and it was confusion on my part (I undid a bunch of my reverts having to do with spouses). I still think "Shinto" should be included in religion though per the traditional narrative. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 22:32, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

January 2023

Hello, I'm Sumanuil. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Princess Alice of Battenberg have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. - Sumanuil. _{(talk to me)} 03:11, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Princess Alice of Battenberg. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. - Sumanuil. _{(talk to me)} 22:34, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Catherine the Great, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Paul I.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 26 January 2023 (UTC)

Post-nominals

While I don't necessarily disagree with removing post-nominals from the ledes of bios and leaving them in the infoboxes, I don't see any rationale for such deletions at WP:POSTNOM and I believe deleting the post-nominals would be something that affects a lot of biographies across Wikipedia; you should thefore seek a strong consensus at a central location before proceeding further, if, indeed, you had plans to. ₪ MIESIANIACAL 17:58, 11 February 2023 (UTC)

Sorry, it's MOS:POSTNOM, and I'm referring to the fourth paragraph. When an individual holds a large number of post-nominal letters or seldom uses them (common among heads of state and members of royal families), they should be omitted from the lead, and the titles only described in the main body of the article. Векочел (talk) 18:24, 11 February 2023 (UTC)

Charles III ALTs

Why are you removing the information from those? It's useful info. Tim O'Doherty (talk) 22:47, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

Using alt captions will cause the screen reader to read both the visible and alt text. Using unnecessary alt descriptions will be irritating to visually impaired readers. Векочел (talk) 22:50, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

Yes, but if you just have the images turned off, and you're reading them, the alts don't make sense. Tim O'Doherty (talk) 22:52, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

Fair enough. Векочел (talk) 22:54, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nauru, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Unitary.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:47, 13 May 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 20

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Grand Duke Alexander Alexandrovich of Russia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dagmar of Denmark.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:19, 20 May 2023 (UTC)

"Reign of Marcus" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Reign of Marcus has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 June 6 § Reign of Marcus until a consensus is reached. ★Trekker (talk) 10:30, 6 June 2023 (UTC)

Henrietta Maria

Stop fucking about. DrKay (talk) 19:04, 17 July 2023 (UTC)

(talk page watcher) That's not on, DrKay. Be more careful with your words; you're a sysop. Tim O'Doherty (talk) 21:19, 17 July 2023 (UTC)

Other British monarch requested move discussions currently taking place

Since you recently participated in the Charles III requested move discussion, I thought you might like to know that there are two other discussions currently going on about other British monarch article titles here and here. Cheers. Rreagan007 (talk) 22:20, 30 July 2023 (UTC)

"King of the United Kingdom" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect King of the United Kingdom has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 July 30 § King of the United Kingdom until a consensus is reached. . This listing also covers Queen of the United Kingdom. You are being notified because you have contributed to one or both of these pages in the past by changing or setting the redirect target. Thank you! Dylnuge ^{(Talk • Edits)} 23:27, 30 July 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Napoleon III, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Baccalaureate.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:15, 18 August 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 30

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

List of shortest-reigning monarchs

added links pointing to Byzantines, Sergius III, John XII, Gregory VI and Heraclius II

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:23, 30 August 2023 (UTC)

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election have opened. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:05, 2 September 2023 (UTC)

September 2023

Jello! Please stop adding surnames to the full names of living reigning monarchs who do not use them. SergeWoodzing (talk) 12:40, 2 September 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Joanna of Castile, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Trastámara.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
1,156		Agrippina the Younger (talk)	Add sources
290		Tiberius Gemellus (talk)	Add sources
380		Livilla (talk)	Add sources
39		Louise Bénédicte de Bourbon (talk)	Add sources
75		Louis Jean Marie de Bourbon, Duke of Penthièvre (talk)	Add sources
2,598		Brighton (talk)	Add sources
6		Helius (freedman) (talk)	Cleanup
206		Nicholas Alexandrovich, Tsesarevich of Russia (talk)	Cleanup
1,815		AT&T Stadium (talk)	Cleanup
2		2006 in Monaco (talk)	Expand
416		Hamad bin Jassim bin Jaber Al Thani (talk)	Expand
41,064		Rishi Sunak (talk)	Expand
290		The Twelve Caesars (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
282		Four in a Bed (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
14		Aulus Caecina Severus (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
3,086		Albert II, Prince of Monaco (talk)	Merge
22		Seventh Ward, New Orleans (talk)	Merge
3		Long Pine Creek (Niobrara River tributary) (talk)	Merge
199		Hackney Empire (talk)	Wikify
142		Louis Philippe I, Duke of Orléans (talk)	Wikify
65		Consultative Assembly of Qatar (talk)	Wikify
7		Rosemary Daniell (talk)	Orphan
2		Joël Garault (talk)	Orphan
8		Bruno Crastes (talk)	Orphan
4		Lucius Fundanius Lamia Aelianus (talk)	Stub
100		Arimathea (talk)	Stub
6		1992 Tulsa Golden Hurricane football team (talk)	Stub
25		Kabane (talk)	Stub
46		Princess Lalla Malika of Morocco (talk)	Stub
18		1981 Cleveland Browns season (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:21, 15 September 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Vale of Glamorgan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rheinfelden.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 25 September 2023 (UTC)

October 2023

Hello, I'm Sumanuil. I noticed that you recently made an edit to Princess Alice of Battenberg in which your edit summary did not appear to explain the change you made. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. - Sumanuil. _{(talk to me)} 05:56, 4 October 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Peter III of Aragon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Constance II.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 7 November 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 20

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mary of Modena, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Maria Anna of Bavaria.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 20 November 2023 (UTC)

“Pre-Reformation”?

You’ve removed certain articles who’s religion is linked to Roman Catholicism with little explanation, can you elucidate please. Raulois (talk) 16:53, 20 November 2023 (UTC)

• Protestant groups like the Anglicans and Lutherans didn't break from Rome until the 16th century, and the vast majority of people in Western Europe were Catholics up to that time. Векочел (talk) 16:56, 20 November 2023 (UTC)

Autopatrolled granted

Hi Векочел, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the autopatrolled user right to your account for three months, after which you can apply to have it permanently extended. This means that pages you create will automatically be marked as 'reviewed', and no longer appear in the new pages feed. Autopatrolled is assigned to prolific creators of articles, where those articles do not require further review, and may have been requested on your behalf by someone else. It doesn't affect how you edit; it is used only to manage the workload of new page patrollers.

Since the articles you create will no longer be systematically reviewed by other editors, it is important that you maintain the high standard you have achieved so far in all your future creations. Please also try to remember to add relevant WikiProject templates, stub tags, categories, and incoming links to them, if you aren't already in the habit; user scripts such as Rater and StubSorter can help with this. As you have already shown that you have a strong grasp of Wikipedia's core content policies, you might also consider volunteering to become a new page patroller yourself, helping to uphold the project's standards and encourage other good faith article writers.

Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! Chetsford (talk) 05:04, 22 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Abdullah of Saudi Arabia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Falconer.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

"then President"

Hello! I've been told that you object to this context in image captions on the grounds that the figures are well know? That would make sense if it just said "President" so what was being communicated was the position, but "then President" is communicating context about a specific time period. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 16:19, 19 December 2023 (UTC)

Personally I think it's redundant to say "then president" because I expect the reader to assume the caption would read "former president" for a picture of a president taken after they left office. But I have no problem at all with wording the caption as then president. Векочел (talk) 16:42, 19 December 2023 (UTC)

Wouldn't we normally have no title just a linked name in that case? Horse Eye's Back (talk) 01:54, 20 December 2023 (UTC)

I don't think the specification is necessary in this case. I would rather have the caption read "Barack Obama" then specify his title. I think he is prominent enough to be widely known, and in case someone has never heard of him there is no trouble with providing a link to the article on Barack Obama. My preference would be the same for other US and UK leaders like Biden and Johnson. However, if you guys want to specify their title, I won't fuss. Векочел (talk) 13:58, 20 December 2023 (UTC)

Voting for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2023 is now open!

Voting is now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2023! The the top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki . Cast your votes vote here and here respectively. Voting closes at 23:59 on 30 December 2023. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. Hawkeye7 (talk · contribs) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:56, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

Taskforce proposal

Hello Векочел given your recent contributions and the fact that you are a member of Wikipedia:WikiProject British Royalty I found it only appropriate to inquire whether you had be interested in joining a William, Prince of Wales taskforce upon its creation dedicated to improving articles related to the future King and above all taking his article to FA status. Just wanted to know your thoughts on this. Merry christmas and looking forward to your reply.

Regards MSincccc (talk) 06:42, 25 December 2023 (UTC)

MSincccc, Mele Kalikimaka! I would be more than happy to join a taskforce dedicated to Prince William. Векочел (talk) 01:16, 26 December 2023 (UTC)

Great to see your enthusiasm. By the way, you can join now that the Taskforce went live yesterday by putting your name here: Wikipedia:WikiProject British Royalty/William, Prince of Wales task force under the Participants section. Regards MSincccc (talk) 02:27, 26 December 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Margrethe II, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Frederick IX.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 26 December 2023 (UTC)

December greetings

December: story · music · places

Thank you for your kind message to me. I wish you merry festive days and a peaceful New Year. -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:22, 26 December 2023 (UTC)

Page moves of monarchs

I mentioned you in this discussion. I tried to ping you, but wasn't able to find all the letters in your name. GoodDay (talk) 17:23, 12 January 2024 (UTC)

Next time, copy and paste for simplicity. There is much argument to be had over the page names, that is what the move discussions are for, but I will try to summarize my stance here. There is no need for of country when there is no ambiguity over the page name. (In fact, I personally believe the article on the current British king should have the country name added because there are multiple Charles III's of considerable stature.) Anyway, I have noticed editors opposed to these moves saying the page moves are "sad" rather than appealing to Wikipedia policy. The editors supporting these moves, however, do generally appear to base their support votes based on Wikipedia policy. Векочел (talk) 21:47, 12 January 2024 (UTC)

Stop!

Simple direct links are preferred. Do not remove pipes to them. - UtherSRG (talk) 13:37, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

@UtherSRG I was puzzled why you reverted Векочел's changes. What about WP:NOPIPE and MOS:NOPIPE? Rosbif73 (talk) 14:11, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

These need to be handled individually, and not in bulk. There are times to use pipes, and there are times not to. This user doesn't appear to be making that distinction. - UtherSRG (talk) 14:16, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

UtherSRG, I have found it is generally preferable to use a redirect than piping to the main article. Is there any test you use to decide when a pipe is needed and when it's not? I am going with what MOS:NOPIPE says, as Rosbif pointed out. Векочел (talk) 19:12, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

WP:NOPIPE is a how-to guide, not a definitive policy. You were unpiping without any seeming rationale for picking and choosing. If piping were something that shouldn't ever be, someone would write a bot, remove all pipes, and disable pipes being something that can be used. Sometimes redirects should be used; sometimes pipes should be used. Wikipedia:Piped link#Use shows there are valid uses for pipes. Can you say you were checking each pipe usage to see that they were appropriate to be unpiped and were not one of the valid uses? That seems unlikely given how fast you were doing the unpipings. - UtherSRG (talk) 23:02, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

WP:NOPIPE is a guide, but it doesn't say anything that resembles "Simple direct links are preferred. Do not remove pipes to them." It actually makes it clear that redirects are generally preferable to unnecessary piped links.

The script that Векочел is using converts links of the form [[A|B]] into links of the form [[B]] if [[B]] is a valid redirect to [[A]], or if [[A]] and [[B]] both redirect to some other page [[C]]. The result is a link that has the same target and displays the same text as the original. I do agree that caution is advisable, and there are cases where exceptions may reasonably be made.

@UtherSRG: you reverted about a hundred of Векочел's edits in about ten minutes. Did you check each example to see that they were actually at fault? Jean-de-Nivelle (talk) 15:55, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

Category:Monarchs diagnosed with cancer

Hello, Векочел,

If a category has been tagged for speedy deletion as an empty category (CSD C1), there is really no good reason to take it to CFD for a week-long discussion. It will be deleted more quickly as a CSD C1, while CFD nominations can sometimes last weeks and what are editors going to debate about an empty category? It's unnecessary and I hope you will stop this practice. Only start CFD discussion about categories where a discussion would be fruitful. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:09, 17 February 2024 (UTC)

February 2024

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:02, 20 February 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Векочел,

Please leave an edit summary with every edit you make. This is especially important with the dozens of page moves you are doing recently where it's not clear why you are moving the articles to different page titles. If you leave a brief explanation, particularly one based in policy, it's less likely that your edit will be reverted because your fellow editors will understand why you made the edit you did. It really takes just a few extra sentences so please take an extra minute and leave an explanatory edit summary. It's good practice on the platform. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:04, 20 February 2024 (UTC)

Invitation to join New pages patrol

Hello Векочел!

• The New Pages Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles needing review. We could use a few extra hands to help.
• We think that someone with your activity and experience is very likely to meet the guidelines for granting.
• Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time, but it requires a strong understanding of Wikipedia’s CSD policy and notability guidelines.
• Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision, and feel free to post on the project talk page with questions.
• If patrolling new pages is something you'd be willing to help out with, please consider applying here.

Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around!

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:21, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

Sorry

I was trying to to revert the whole DOB, per WP:DOB, but reverted your cn template instead. Now fixed. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 05:10, 3 March 2024 (UTC)

March 2024

Hello! Did you really think this was a good idea, removing the linked reference to her place of birth? You could at least have linked it in the info box. I am asking you now to do that. Please be more careful, and please (as requested above) leave edit summaries! SergeWoodzing (talk) 13:21, 11 March 2024 (UTC)

• I will try to be more consisteny with my edit summaries. However, per MOS:BIRTHPLACE, Birth and death places, if known, should be mentioned in the body of the article, and can appear in the lead if relevant to notability, but not in the opening brackets alongside the birth and death dates. Векочел (talk) 13:53, 11 March 2024 (UTC)

Thank you! It would have beemn nice if you would have linked her place of birth in the info box when you removed it elsewhere. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 13:46, 12 March 2024 (UTC)

You changed the link to a location in Norway and in Västergötland. Fixed now. Are you going to be more careful? --SergeWoodzing (talk) 09:57, 13 March 2024 (UTC)

March 2024 (2)

Please do not change any info-box names so that they do not correspond to (1) article names and (2) names as given in article text. If you want such name changes you need to request article moves (renaming). No other way. SergeWoodzing (talk) 09:55, 13 March 2024 (UTC)

• See WP:NOPIPE. The page on Anund Jacob was presumably moved to remove the country name, and the article on Cnut the Great was also moved. Векочел (talk) 10:33, 13 March 2024 (UTC)

  What is this supposed to mean? Please start using edit summaries. TylerBurden (talk) 19:52, 14 March 2024 (UTC)

  It means illegitimate. His son was born out of wedlock. Векочел (talk) 20:03, 14 March 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Richeza of Poland, Queen of Hungary, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Helen of Hungary.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 15 March 2024 (UTC)

Infoboxes

Hello, Векочел,

Why are you making massive, undiscussed changes, removing religion from Infoboxes where previous editors had added it in? Is there policy regarding this? I was going to revert all of your changes until I saw you were an experienced editor, not a new account, but it seems like you are making changes on a grand scale without discussion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:50, 15 March 2024 (UTC)

• In most cases the religion of these royals is simply not notable. We don't list the religion for Queen Elizabeth II's three younger children or for Charles III's sons, for instance. Векочел (talk) 19:52, 15 March 2024 (UTC)

In cases like Catherine Jagellon, her religion is a vital detail, yet you removed it twice there also. I've now fixed that twice. Please slow down, at least read articles you wish to change, and be more careful! --SergeWoodzing (talk) 15:44, 16 March 2024 (UTC)

Haile Selassie

@Векочел Would you mind helping User:CtasACT by going through all the references on the above mentioned article and also ensuring whether they meet Wikipedia's policy or not. The GA review is taking place at-Talk:Haile Selassie/GA2. I would greatly appreciate it if you could help. Regards MSincccc (talk) 13:54, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

• I will look at it shortly. Векочел (talk) 23:02, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

April 2024

Please stop doing this! Nobility and royalty are not the same thing. I would think you knew that before going about all those faulty changes?! SergeWoodzing (talk) 19:20, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

Royalty is a subset of nobility. Indeed Category:Royalty on Wikipedia is a subset of Category:Nobility. Векочел (talk) 19:22, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

That is not correct. Read the articles, be enlightened and stop doing this! --SergeWoodzing (talk) 19:36, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

April 2024 (2)

You are doing a lot of damage with changes like this. Unless you go back and fix those articles, we are heading for serious trouble. It is far more relevant that these people are the children of monarchs than any other less relevant titles. SergeWoodzing (talk) 19:36, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

A prince regnant is a type of monarch. Векочел (talk) 19:40, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

Yes, I do know that. That's not what I wrote to you about. Read it again and fix your errors! --SergeWoodzing (talk) 19:53, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

The page Elizabeth II is already under Category:Daughters of kings. (I did not categorize it.) What is the point of removing a category when it helps to disambiguate? As for the pages which I placed in Swedish nobility, I will have a second look. Векочел (talk) 20:04, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

You are changing categories from helpful ones to much less relevant ones when you make changes like the one I linked to at the top of this talk section. Understand? It is far more relevant that these people are the children of monarchs than any other less relevant titles. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 18:14, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Categorization states “Each categorized page should be placed in all of the most specific categories to which it logically belongs. This means that if a page belongs to a subcategory of C (or a subcategory of a subcategory of C, and so on) then it is not normally placed directly into C.” So it would appear that User:Векочел is correct in moving to the more specific subcategory, since Category:Sons of princes regnant is a subcategory of Category:Sons of monarchs. It’s the same reason why Princess Astrid of Belgium is categorized under Category:Daughters of kings, not Category:Daughters of monarchs. 170.76.231.175 (talk) 19:59, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

Mothers of monarchs

For the most part, I think the categories are, at least in theory, supposed to be limited to women who lived to see their children become monarchs. At the very least, that's the philosophy I was using when considering adding them to the category. 98.228.137.44 (talk) 21:47, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

In history, whoever was the mother of a monarch is counted as such whether or not she lived to see the monarch's reign. It's the monarch's relationship to her that's most relevant. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 11:08, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

Category:Children of princesses regnant has been nominated for merging

Category:Children of princesses regnant has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. NLeeuw (talk) 01:13, 12 April 2024 (UTC)

Thinker78 CfDs

Your nominations are spurious. Being found disruptive months after creating categories is not a valid reason for deleting them. Please close your nominations immediately. I have commented on the first one, but frankly, a wholesale listing like that is also bordering on the disruptive. ——Serial Number 54129 17:20, 13 April 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for that Векочел, I respect that. As a compromise, let's leave that one open (I will adjust my comment) and see if it gains traction; I could always be wong... Thanks again. ——Serial Number 54129 17:26, 13 April 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Sons of princesses regnant

A tag has been placed on Category:Sons of princesses regnant indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 14:34, 22 April 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Daughters of princesses regnant

A tag has been placed on Category:Daughters of princesses regnant indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 14:34, 22 April 2024 (UTC)

Hadrian's marriage

Well caught! That was a truly egregious error... Amazing how long these things can go undetected. Haploidavey (talk) 12:00, 24 April 2024 (UTC)

Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C

You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to other languages.

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:10, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

Disruptive editing

Please do not remove any more images of the Japanese Emperors without establishing a consensus to do so. In many cases there are no contemporary depictions in existance which is akin to Christopher Columbus where a visual is helpful to the reader when it's referenced by historians. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 16:28, 11 May 2024 (UTC)

• Columbus's portrait, at least, was painted relatively shortly after his death. The pictures of Japanese emperors which I removed were drawn hundreds of years after the subjects lived. Векочел (talk) 19:44, 11 May 2024 (UTC)

• You still need to gain a consensus on the talkpage of the articles involved since your edits are contested. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 21:37, 11 May 2024 (UTC)

May 2024

Your recent editing history at Tony Blair shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 14:16, 12 May 2024 (UTC)

Hello! I'm EmilySarah99. Your recent edit(s) to the page Mary II appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been reverted for now. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Mary was heir apparent during her joint reign. If her husband were to die, she would continue reigning as sole monarch. This is stated on the category page. EmilySarah99 (talk) 11:09, 19 May 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 27

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ingrid of Sweden, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Crown Prince Frederik of Denmark.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

June 2024

Before adding a category to an article, as you did to Category:19th-century kings of Italy, please make sure that the subject of the article really belongs in the category that you specified according to Wikipedia's categorization guidelines. The category being added must already exist, and must be supported by the article's verifiable content. Categories may be removed if they are deemed incorrect for the subject matter. Please dont massively add categories like this Mason (talk) 04:22, 22 June 2024 (UTC)

Please review how categories work before you massively add religions. This is a case of overcategorization. You should add these categories to the individual pages, not the the category. Mason (talk) 04:36, 22 June 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Fabiola of Belgium, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Albert II.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:30, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Louis VII of France, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Louis VI.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:59, 8 July 2024 (UTC)