- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by BlueMoonset (talk) 05:11, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
Ferlo Desert
editCreated/expanded by Rosiestep (talk). Nominated by Nyttend (talk) at 00:22, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
Please remember to provide us with a QPQ. Thanks, Poeticbent talk 20:28, 15 November 2012 (UTC)- Not a full review, but two terms stick out as overly technical or obscure - "Relic valleys" and "sylvopastoral", a more common description should be used. The Interior (Talk) 23:51, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
- Reviewed: Ruthenian nobility. --Rosiestep (talk) 20:07, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
- Review New enough. Long enough. Plagiarism checker is clean. No close paraphrasing. I think the hook should read ". . . that part of central Senegal is Ferlo Desert?" I also think that the article should have a little more about the diagnosis, etiology and prognosis of the use of water, floral and faunal resources — the effect of the bore holes was genuinely interesting — which is discussed in some of the sources. But that is no reason to reject the DYK. QPQ was done, even though none was required, since it was not a self nomination. As to off line sources, given author's prior work I would WP:AGF. Sourcing clearly and amply supports hook. My other concern is that this hook is dryly (pun intended) informative, and not very hooky.
7&6=thirteen (☎) 21:47, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
- ALT1: ... that the Ferlo Desert occupies one-third of Senegal's total area? --Rosiestep (talk) 22:46, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
- I like ALT1. QPQ was taken care of. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 02:29, 26 November 2012 (UTC)