Talk:Wirehaired Vizsla

Latest comment: 9 months ago by Justlettersandnumbers in topic Copyright problem removed

Initial Article Creation from Vizsla Article

edit

Since the Wire-haired Vizsla is universally recognized as a different breed than the Vizsla, I have created this article and moved the appropriate information and images from the Vizsla article. Briantresp (talk) 18:22, 18 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image

edit

The problem is that the dogs in the picture are not wire-haired, but regular vizslas.

Warrington (talk) 19:27, 6 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Remove wrong pictures and add a wire haired Vizsla instead.

Warrington (talk) 20:00, 6 March 2009 (UTC)Reply


Actually, all three of the images that you removed pretty clearly show did HWV, rather than Vizsla puppies, all with the beginnings of guard hairs present, although the last was pretty fuzzy, clarity wise. The majority of HWV pups do not start life with a noticable wire coat, and some are entirely smooth coated as puppies, but they are still HWV's nonetheless.

Joviankid (talk) 23:09, 9 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

edit

  Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://web.archive.org/web/20080416214020/https://www.ukcdogs.com/WebSite.nsf/Breeds/HungarianWire-HairedVizsla. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, provided it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 10:41, 27 February 2024 (UTC)Reply