Talk:Spoon class theory
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | This article was the subject of an educational assignment in Spring 2015. Further details were available on the "Education Program:Hanyang University/Sociology of Globalization (2016) (Fall)" page, which is now unavailable on the wiki. |
 | A member of the Guild of Copy Editors, Miniapolis, reviewed a version of this article for copy editing on 31 May 2017. However, a major copy edit was inappropriate at that time because of the issues specified below, or the other tags now found on this article. Once these issues have been addressed, and any related tags have been cleared, please tag the article once again for {{copyedit}}. The Guild welcomes all editors with a good grasp of English. Visit our project page if you are interested in joining! Please address the following issues as well as any other cleanup tags before re-tagging this article with copyedit: Notability concerns |
 | It is requested that an image or photograph of Spoon class theory be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible. Wikipedians in South Korea may be able to help! The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
This article needs a lot of work
editThe English Wikipedia is not Korea. Sentences like
- He suggested that gold spoon is included in a simulacrum that doesn’t have an original. Issues of gold spoon celebrities and commercials which made those people idealize changed nonexistence as existence .
appear to be bad translations (presumably from Korean) by someone whose knowledge of English was non-native and not very grammatical. Also, expressions like "our society", meaning South Korean society, are out of place in an encyclopedia with worldwide readership, and much of the language is distorted almost beyond comprehension. -- Thnidu (talk) 15:56, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
Hyperreal shock
editI don't edit wikipedia and don't know how to do it properly, but the first sentence of the section sociological analysis has a bit flagged as jargon. what is being talked about I found out with a bit of digging is this book I will link to an amazon listing of because I don't know what record of published books is actually apropriate.
https://www.amazon.com/Hyperreal-shock-Korean-Choi-Hyo-chan/dp/8960864994
it is not jargon but saying this person published the above book, but I don't know how to properly clarify and edit that into the article so I am adding that information here for someone more experienced to properly fix it. this article piqued my interest and I might be doing more research to add to this talk page to help fix it, wish me luck! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:2C3:57F:4730:10F5:6A8A:1EC7:C6F7 (talk) 16:17, 5 May 2022 (UTC)