Talk:Paulias Matane

Fair use rationale for Image:MyChildhoodinNewGuinea.jpg

Image:MyChildhoodinNewGuinea.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 05:56, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

"Takes a firm line on expatriates"

For those readers not familiar with PNG politics, what exactly is his line on them? EikwaR (talk) 04:58, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

"Firm line" is colloquial as well as mysterious. I presume the writer means to say that Matane is a racist 203.184.55.172 (talk) 06:11, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

"Racist" is inflammatory and unfair language. "Firm line" means he is strongly against the establishment of businesses in PNG by citizens of other countries. Whether one agrees with him or not, it is reasonable for any country to wish to keep control of its economy. MarcusCole12 (talk) 23:15, 13 January 2010 (UTC)

The paragraph was unsourced. As it was unclear, and potentially libellous and inflammatory, I've removed it altogether, per BLP. In addition, it was similar to content added repeatedly to the article on Michael Somare by an anonymous editor, who also used that article's talk page to rant about "expatriates" (particularly Australian-born) in Papua New Guinea. Consensus among established editors has been to revert such edits. (The anonymous editor has an IP based in Brisbane, and has consistently made unsourced edits designed to make Somare, PNG's Prime Minister, look foolish. Apparently he's doing the same to Matane.) Finally, Matane is Governor-General; his function is to be above politics, as representative of the Queen. He is unlikely, and constitutionally unable, to take a "firm line" on any political issue. Which stronly suggests that the unsourced claim was nonsense. Aridd (talk) 13:13, 10 August 2010 (UTC)