Talk:Panama Papers

Latest comment: 8 months ago by 2604:3D09:D78:1000:EBD5:90F0:22E0:3387 in topic Cash

Various nations have been removed

edit

Anybody know why? for instance, Ecuador is no longer in the article. Among many others.

Why do you think? There's also no mention that a whistleblower was assassinated. Caruana Galizia, in a car bomb. And if you try to add them back, the changes will be reverted... --George.cc (talk) 10:36, 3 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

In particular, Zelensky and his partners 2601:600:9080:7EA0:49F9:FE9A:670C:6CA4 (talk) 19:39, 8 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Vessel flags pertaining Crude oil tankers.

edit

The leaks may have to do with Oil industry through Panama business or trade. Some tied to Iran and Russia, Election fraud IRGC. You cannot blame and point fingers. Iran Oil and trade at questionable due to use of Weapons of war biochemicals. 174.29.93.157 (talk) 08:27, 26 February 2022 (UTC)Reply


Cash

edit

There is potential to mislead here, as the definition of "cash" is not made clear. Cash can be physical note and coin as in "Other tapes caught their associates stuffing pockets, bags and even their socks with cash",[1] but in real estate transactions "a cash buyer" is unlikely to be bringing a suitcase, or duffel bag of notes, but instead is paying with a cheque or bank transfer. The distinction is about the ability to pay without having to arrange a mortgage or other loan. (In fact they may have raised the "cash" though a loan, or indeed any means, but the "cash" is ready to go.) How can we avoid this risk of misleading?

All the best: Rich Farmbrough 15:43, 3 February 2024 (UTC).Reply

Could a phrase like "paid upfront" or "paid in full" be used instead. How, exactly, was it facilitated? Bearer bonds? Email transfer? Specifying that could help too, if possible. 2604:3D09:D78:1000:EBD5:90F0:22E0:3387 (talk) 04:24, 10 March 2024 (UTC)Reply