![]() | Oghul Qaimish is currently a Royalty, nobility and heraldry good article nominee. Nominated by ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) at 23:30, 30 June 2024 (UTC) An editor has indicated a willingness to review the article in accordance with the good article criteria. Further reviews are welcome from any editor who has not contributed significantly to this article (or nominated it), and can be added to the review page, but the decision whether or not to list the article as a good article should be left to the first reviewer.
|
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Name
editOghul Qaimish or Oghul-Qaimish seems to be the usual transliteration in contemporary English language scholarship: see Peter Jackson, Mongols and the West, pp. 99, 115; David Morgan, The Mongols, p. 182; Igor de Rachewiltz, Papal Envoys to the Great Khans, pp. 122-3, 128, 139; James D. Ryan, "Mongol Khatuns" in Trade, Travel, and Exploration in the Middle Ages: an Encyclopedia. JSTOR has three hits for Oghul Qaimish, none for Oghul Ghaimish. I shall move the page. Aramgar (talk) 23:54, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
another botched article on the Mongols
editNot even a mention of her conviction for using "black magic." Pitiful. Needs a lot of work.50.111.46.18 (talk) 12:41, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Oghul Qaimish/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: AirshipJungleman29 (talk · contribs) 23:30, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Thebiguglyalien (talk · contribs) 06:34, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
I'll have a review written for this some time within the next week. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 06:34, 21 July 2024 (UTC)