Talk:Ni Putes Ni Soumises

Translation issues

My French translations are very rough-and-ready. Anyone care to polish them?

I was particularly stuck on quartiers, in the end I translated that as housing projects which is really closer to cités, but I thought it should have a more specific meaning than "neighbourhood".

Also, I found references to a male "response" called Ni machos ni proxos - what does proxos mean?

Cheers, fabiform | talk 07:27, 11 Feb 2004 (UTC)

Proxos stands for proxénète which is in france the man who looks after a prostitute, the one who protects her and who takes money from her. I'm french, don't know if my explanation is good, hope you'll understand. Tipiac from french wikipedia

Ah, thank you Tipiac, you're explanation was perfectly clear.  :) The English word for that is pimp. I'll add that into the article later. Cheers, fabiform | talk 13:12, 11 Feb 2004 (UTC)

Ni ... ni ...

How should we translate Ni Putes Ni Soumises? There are several options depending on what we want to emphasise.

• Neither/Nor is good for the most accurate translation of the construction of the French. It loses some of the, how can I put this, linguistic power of the French however. The repetiton of Ni makes the French catchy, but Neither/Nor replaces this with a two/one syllable construction which is actually quite formal for a slogan or catchphrase.
• Not/Not focuses on replicating the snappy aspect of the French, and suffers from a grammatical point of view since it's a less precise translation.
• Not/Or replaces some of the Neither/Nor meaning (it is used in informal English to replace neither/nor), retains the one/one pattern, but loses the N__/N__ pattern of all the other translations.

Also, the rest of the phrase. Pute could be Bitch or Whore. Bitch doesn't really carry the same meaning of a woman as a sexual object which I assume the French is trying to get across. Soumises - is this being used as an adjective or a noun (does it exist as a noun in French?). It seems a bit strange to me to have a slogan which reads Neither [noun] Nor [adjective].

Here are the translations we've had so far, and some I've found online:

• Neither Bitch nor Submissive
• Neither Bitches nor Submissives
• Not Whores Not Submissives
• Neither Whores Nor Submissives
• Not Whores Or Submissives
• Neither Whores Nor Submissive

• Not Whores Not Servants
• Neither Whores Nor Doormats
• Neither Whore Nor Submissive
• Neither Whores Nor Downtrodden
• Neither a whore, nor a submissive housewife
• Neither Slags Nor Submissives
• Neither whores nor controlled
• Neither Whores Nor Slaves
• Not Whores and Not Subordinated
• Neither prostitutes nor submissive
• No whores, nor submissive
• Neither whores, nor downtrodden women
• Neither sluts nor submissive
• Neither whore nor housewife
• Neither whores, nor submitted (ha ha)

- :) fabiform | talk 05:51, 12 Feb 2004 (UTC)

Aut Caesar, aut nihil... the Latin languages certainly have an easier way with constructions of this kind. My vote is for "neither... nor...", only because it's the closest reflection of the French grammar. The force of the repetition of the original is lost ("snappiness" – exactly!), but I think if you're translating an organization's name, then it best not to get too creative, too far from the original. So my vote is for "Neither Whores Nor Submissive". Although I'm tempted by "Neither Slags Nor Slaves", I'd hesitate to use such a loose translation without getting an OK from the organization itself. Anyone else? –Hajor 14:05, 13 Feb 2004 (UTC)

I have a stupid question. Why do you absolutely want to translate organisation names, or people names ? The article about Médecins Sans Frontières is in french, right ? Why would you translate this name, to such a point no one would recognise the original translation ?

It's not about translating the organization's name. It's about providing an into-English gloss for the name on its first occurrence: to give a sense of what the name means to those who've forgotten their schoolboy French, certainly not to re-baptise it in a foreign language. That explains my insistence, above, on not getting too far from either the grammar or meaning of the French. As you'll have seen, the rest of the article then uses the French name, or the French abbreviation, on subsequent mentions. Ultimately, not that dissimilar to the MSF article. Best, –Hajor 01:59, 16 Feb 2004 (UTC)

ah, okay, I thought you wanted to change the title of the article. I think Neither Whores Nor Submissives is best. It is certainly not "no...no...", and I think Whores is nearer the french meaning in that context. ant

Elisabeth Badinter

I'm not sure if this following link is really representative of and thus sutable for an overview of french feminism as Badinters views are biased and disputed and don't represent a "mainstream" or generally accepted view on the state of thing. *A discussion on French feminism. Maybe this should be discussed in a separate article. --84.131.35.1 22:22, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)

All faiths?

The group claims to be curbing domestic violence in all faiths, not just Islam. Hence, the see also link should be to Domestic violence, not just "Islam and Domestic violence", which is a subcategory of the former.VR _talk 18:09, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

Cite? Judging from the article domestic violence isn't one of their primary focuses. They are however clearly very focused on Islam, which is why it makes sense for that link to be there.Prezbo (talk) 18:59, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

Actually Women in Islam would probably be a better article to link to.Prezbo (talk) 19:15, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

The history of the movement shows that it was started by Muslim women to address violence to their Muslim sisters at first, only subsequently generating sympathy and support in society at large. So, the "Women and Islam" and "Islam and Domestic violence" categories fit. In addition, the focus of the movement is on violence against women, not domestic violence in general. So, Violence against women is a better fit. Finally, there is no link between the leaders of NPNS and the people behind Manifesto: Together Facing the New Totalitarianism, which is being merged away anyway. I have edited the categories accordingly.82.92.238.234 (talk) 18:35, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

File:Ni Putes Ni Soumises cover.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Ni Putes Ni Soumises cover.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 23 August 2011 What should I do? Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 05:37, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Ni Putes Ni Soumises. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080117081319/http://www.lautrecampagne.org/article.php?id=132 to http://www.lautrecampagne.org/article.php?id=132
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051123230346/http://www.mariebrenner.com/articles/daughters/daughters.html to http://www.mariebrenner.com/articles/daughters/daughters.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:28, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ni Putes Ni Soumises. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20040808183422/http://www.laic.info/Members/webmestre/Parution.2003-11-07.0442/view to http://www.laic.info/Members/webmestre/Parution.2003-11-07.0442/view

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:48, 18 February 2018 (UTC)