Talk:Malawi

Latest comment: 1 year ago by AirshipJungleman29 in topic GA Reassessment
Former good articleMalawi was one of the Geography and places good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
On this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 11, 2008Good article nomineeListed
November 17, 2008Peer reviewReviewed
November 24, 2008Featured article candidateNot promoted
October 25, 2023Good article reassessmentDelisted
On this day... Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on July 6, 2005, July 6, 2006, July 6, 2007, July 6, 2008, July 6, 2009, July 6, 2010, July 6, 2011, July 6, 2012, July 6, 2013, July 6, 2014, July 6, 2015, July 6, 2016, July 6, 2017, July 6, 2018, July 6, 2019, July 6, 2020, July 6, 2021, July 6, 2022, and July 6, 2023.
Current status: Delisted good article

"Women in Malawi" section needs major revisions

edit

The placement and content of the "Women in Malawi" section of the article is fairly odd. Based on what the other major sections of the article are, it should probably be a subsection under one of them rather than its own standalone section. It would probably fit well under either the existing "Demographics" or "Human Rights" sections of the article. Additionally, the tone and grammar of the section are noticeably odd. It reads like something that came directly from a government task force or committee, instead of how informative sections are usually phrased for articles about nations here on Wikipedia. I don't want to just singlehandedly decide which parts of that section need rewriting or rephrasing, so I was hoping we could get some consensus here on what should remain in the section as is, what should be removed, and what should be rewritten or rephrased. MojaveSummit (talk) 21:59, 7 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

It is odd here, but could probably be its own article. CMD (talk) 23:23, 7 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Consensus for language section of infobox

edit

The language section of the infobox is being reverted back and forth by myself and user RC88. They keep blanking the language section of the infobox claiming there are no sources for the information. I have tried pointing out how the source listed clearly states the information there. User RC88 insists that it does not use the exact wording of national and regional languages so it is not a correct source. I insist that those parameters are not required to have that.

What is the consensus for this so the edit warring stops? Wkpdsrnm2023 (talk) 00:46, 14 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Update: an agreement was reached and the languages were re-labeled as "spoken languages". Wkpdsrnm2023 (talk) 13:52, 14 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Child who is looking for her father

edit

Hello everyone my name is Talawa Qomisa I am looking for a my father called Innocent Patrick Fundi he is from Malawi in Lilongwe in Blantyre can anyone help me find him because I really would appreciate your help 41.114.175.75 (talk) 11:50, 17 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

GA Reassessment

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · WatchWatch article reassessment pageMost recent review
Result: Delisted. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 23:55, 25 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Multiple cases of missing citations/unsourced content and need for greater comprehensiveness on topic (particularly in certain sections). May also need some updating (neither the History nor Health sections talk about the COVID-19 pandemic, which I think should be mentioned and definitely has RS on). General cleanup and miscellaneous work is also needed in many sections. Dan the Animator 07:34, 11 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Also forgot to mention this above but this is my first GA re-review proposal so if I made any mistakes please let me know. Personally would've preferred just fixing the mistakes myself but the article unfortunately is in need of many major edits. Dan the Animator 07:39, 11 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
Agree a bit of work could be done. The article has odd bits of extreme detail (I've removed some trivia about Liberland), Science and technology seems oddly undue and "Women in Malawi" feels like it was written for a different article. At the same time, some other sections/subsections are oddly short, eg. Administrative divisions. CMD (talk) 12:24, 11 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.