Talk:List of Sailor Moon video games

Moon Cup

Was that in the original text or just part of the Fan translation (I'm puttting it back in for now)--Lego3400: The Sage of Time 04:01, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

Someone would have to have the untranslated Japanese version to know. I sure don't. --Masamage 04:13, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

The fan translation has a lot of errors, even if it's not so bad overall. The Grail was not called the Moon Cup, for example, though they may have changed it for space concerns. Many of the monsters have mangled names. A reference was inserted to "Inner Senshi" when the original line didn't include it. There's also a few dub names from time to time in the script. Sadly, nobody's ever fixed the script and the group dissolved within weeks of the patch's release. Rebochan 17:07, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

Stages in Japanese

What do the stages, Latin Quarter, Amusement Park, Secret Machine, Silver Millennium, and Dark Kingdom mean in Japanese Katakana? --PJ Pete

I don't understand the question. Do you mean "how are they spelled"? --Masamage 00:07, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

Latin Quarter in Japanese would be: Raten Korutaa. --PJ Pete

Errors in the French release of Sailor Moon

If Sailor Venus was renamed to "Sailor Mathilde", that would mean that her name was supposed to be "Sailor Venus", not "Sailor Matilda", "Sailor Mathilda", or "Sailor Mathilde". --PJ Pete

I don't follow your logic. I translated the french wikipedia's articles to get this page. I must admit, I wasn't sure whether to leave that section in or not, as it would have limited use for most people...- Malkinann 08:31, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

In template

In the template of the first Sailor Moon video game, you will need to upload the box cover of the Super Famicom edition of that game and put it in the template of the first Sailor Moon video game. --PJ Pete

Umm.. We have bigger conerns then this page.. And things like that are hard to find... Instead of Telling us what to do, do a bit of looking for yourself. Lego3400: The Sage of Time 16:46, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

Developing, Publishing, and Licensing

The first Sailor Moon video game was both developed and published by Angel. Nintendo, Sega, and Sony only licenced those games, they didn't publish them. --PJ Pete

Yeah we know thatLego3400: The Sage of Time 16:46, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

Wii

It's officially rumor status now. Yesasia pulled down the page without explanation. And the official site never mentioned it. *sighs* so sad.--Hitsuji Kinno (talk) 04:32, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

Alas. We should probably pull the mention of it, then. --Masamage ♫ 04:36, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

Image

I added an image of the Oppsito Senshi but it's nothing but game sprites (Headshot and Feild Sprite) It's ment to serve as a place holder while I get a better one ready. However we have choices we could Either: A stick with spritework and use their battle sprites (Which are larger and a single image) or we could avoid sprites altogether. I found some really nice artwork of them from what looks like the manual. I'm just afraid it's too large to crop into a single image. The artwork is here: http://www.fantasyanime.com/animerpgs/pssm_pics.htm I got the sprites there too. --Lego3400: The Sage of Time (talk) 02:15, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

Alas. This is really the sort of thing you should bring up in discussion before spending a lot of time on it. According to the copyright and fair use policy, cobbling together many different copyrighted images doesn't actually turn them into a single unit. This counts for the same as if you had added 15 new copyrighted images to the article. Anyway, I'm not sure why we need an illustration of the Oppositio Senshi? It doesn't really add to the reader's understanding of the subject.

I mean, I'm with you that I wish we could have an image like this. They're cool-looking, and it's fun to actually know what they look like and see the patterns and things. But we don't own the image, and the only time we can use images we don't own is when we need them. For us to need this image, we would have to have a considerable amount of discussion of the character design, visual appearance, and significance of the Oppositio Senshi as fictional entities. In order to have that kind of discussion, they would have to be notable in the real world, and to have received coverage in a third-party publication. But they don't, and they haven't.

It sucks, but it's the rules. I'm sorry, but I don't think we can justify something like this. :/ --Masamage ♫ 05:44, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

I'm hopeing to try and make this section large enough from the others (As it has a storyline comparable to each of the Arcs to cover while the others don't. There are also a few fan sites devoted entirely to this game (such as the one linked) we can use for resources and such) to break it off onto a separate page. Also I threw this together in 5, 10 Mins. Tops. I intended it as a place holder while I gauged people's reactions to haveing an image of them. Also While we're covering images, there's no way we'd be able to get box art for every game listed unless we did some breaking them off.-Lego3400: The Sage of Time (talk) 00:13, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

We can't use fansites for references anymore. Only third-party reviews, which we'll never find in English because it hasn't been officially released here. If we had someone fluent in Japanese there might be a chance of sourcing it that way, but we definitely can't do it with fansites.

And no, we can't have box art for everything, either. Nor do we really need it. ^_^;;; --Masamage ♫ 04:19, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

... But aren't Fan sites 3rd parties and often include reviews?... Unless you mean so called Creditable 3rd parties. (Which more often then not get more wrong info the fan sites, as fans make an attempt to be accurate and have intricate knowledge a professional reviewer lacks. In this cast the game requires the player to be familiar with bits of both the anime and manga of the first 3 arcs. We'd be luck if a professional is familiar with one arc in either media) --Lego3400: The Sage of Time (talk) 20:38, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

I mean reliable sources, yes. We've gotta follow the rules, or we'll get smacked around when it comes time to try and get our stuff featured. --Masamage ♫ 20:57, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

I took the time and replaced the image with one out of the manual. I cleaned it up and removed the text and labled it. However As of writeing this I'm replaceing it with an unlabled version as upon doing some research I found Kishar is the proper spelling of Anshar's pet and don't feel like going back and relabeling it.

Another Story: Need help with citations and Kanna

Dies Guadii has a page of info on the Charcters from Another Story, including their names in Japanese their name origins, attack names and the Japanese versions of those. I need two bits of help with the info. 1st. I am unfamiliar with how to cite the same source multiple times so I need someone to go in and add them for me where appropriate (I've already added a bit of the info, Also We can also cite the original game were we can, the info is the same) Secondly, I need someone to type in the Japanese versions of their name. His site has the characters but he displays them as images so people without proper text support for Japanese characters can read them, or I'd just copy and paste them where appropriate. The page for all the info is Here ---Lego3400: The Sage of Time (talk) 21:15, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

The 3D Adventures of Sailor Moon

Would it be alright to make a section about the first North American Sailor Moon game? This page: http://moonsisters.org/moonsisters/3D/3D.htm has made available screen shots and an over view of the game. Since no other websites exist with this outside of sailorvgame.org, could it be cited as a reference? FF3TerraAndLocke (talk) 12:23, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

Natsume: Moonwing Warrior (Metrostar-Bizzare/Studio Vector) 2001/Codename: Nightstar 2002

There is no proof that this game nor its developer existed at any point in time and no reasonable source given, only a post on what looks to be a fan-made forum. -Einstein95 (talk) 09:18, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

REJECTED: The source link is confirmed by Materialscientist. Natsume96 (talk) 09:20, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Confirmed where? Materialscientist (talk) 10:19, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

I've contacted User:Materialscientist for their input on this subject, as I'm not clear on what their having "confirmed" it means. At present, it appears to be self-published and not backed up by any other sources. Vague | Rant 10:18, 23 November 2015 (UTC)