Regarding Mila

edit

I still think that the sentences regarding Bastide's opinion of Mila in the Biography section are Wikipedia:UNDUE or a very POV heavy bit of translation of the source. I think there's a conversation to be had about how relevant the information is to the article, but regardless I think this bit needs a definite rewrite. I'd like to hear others opinions! Philipnelson99 (talk) 21:30, 9 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

@Strambotik, thought I'd ping you since you were the one who made the initial edit! Philipnelson99 (talk) 21:31, 9 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

@@Fiorala: I think it's best you remove the info about Mila, until we can build a consensus on whether this information is relevant. This content has already been removed twice before. Philipnelson99 (talk) 01:41, 11 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hello, The previous text was obviously not neutrally worded. Mine is. Bastide is literally an activist on gender and "intersectional" issues. Her opinions on these issues is literally her business (this is not pejorative) and there are whole articles in the press about her opinion on the Mila affair. This is obviously relevant. --Fiorala (talk) 08:39, 11 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
I agree that two neutrally-worded referenced sentences is not undue and the text added is far superior to the prior text. However little this has affected the Anglosphere, it has apparently been a big deal in the Francosphere and merits some mention. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 16:32, 11 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:53, 12 August 2021 (UTC)Reply