Talk:Isabelle Arvers
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
Question of Notability
editI removed the Prod notice which had been placed because the article is effectively an autobiography: while autobiography is discouraged for reasons of conflict of interest, it is not itself a reason for deletion. The article itself is probably just on the right side of notability, if the various interview External Links check out. AllyD (talk) 18:33, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
I try to be as close as I can to the wikipedia policy, knowing that english is not my mother language and that I also try to give all the reliable sources I can. I hope that this page can serve to art students and also to machinima makers.
I go on the corrections azll the advices are welcomed — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zabarvers (talk • contribs) 18:51, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
- @Salvidrim!, what's your take on the notability here, especially vis-à-vis the French sources? czar 19:25, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
- So many of the sources are currently dead and the article is more like a curriculum vitae -- that being said, I would think this subject is notable under Wikipedia's guidelines. Per WP:CREATIVE, she's renowned as a top expert in her field (machinima, amongst other things). Here are a few additional sources I could find quickly: [1] (if we could find the videos archived somehwere), [2], [3], [4] -- and there is surely more to be found but I have to head out for family dinner. If you need source translations let me know (although machine translations of French to English are generally competent and lengthier pieces might take me some chunk of time :p) ☺ · Salvidrim! · ✉ 19:42, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Isabelle Arvers. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090616183258/http://mitpress.mit.edu/main/home/default.asp to http://mitpress.mit.edu/main/home/default.asp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:49, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
contacted to remove tags on my page
editHi, I was contacted today on my email and instagram account to remove tags on the top of my wikipedia page : here is the message i recieved: I'm reaching out with regard to your Wikipedia page. Would the removal of the tags at the top of your article be of any interest? Moderators are currently doing maintenance, and the article risks being deleted soon, or having most of its content removed. It's something I can have resolved in no time, for a small fee. I can also make any necessary updates/edits to the page, as long as they're constructive and feasible.
What should i do? thanks for your reply;) Zabarvers (talk) 15:34, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
- Ignore. Nobody should be charging you to edit your Wikipedia article, and while there are some tags indicating that improvements should be made, I see no proposal to delete the page. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 23:50, 13 September 2023 (UTC)