Talk:Institution
This level-4 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 365 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
Untitled
editThe economics discussion about institutions looks inaccurate (or at least, old-fashioned) to me. FWICT, institutions are mostly viewed as (Nash) equilibria in games, rather than the structure of the game itself. That is, game theory analyses of institutions often attempt to demonstrate why a particular social structure is stable or self-enforcing. Am I being biased here? Is there anything I should read to get a more balanced view of modern economic thinking relating to institutions?
Obviously, if you want to understand the effects of an institution, rather than understand the institution itself, then you could take the institution as exogenous, and construct games in which the only possible actions are ones that follow the rules of the institution.
Any objections to a rewrite of the economics section along these lines?
--Clausen 05:54, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Economics section rewrite
editI have done the rewrite of the economics section I proposed earlier. --Clausen 11:01, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Poorly written lead section
editThe first few sentences excessively use phrases like “further” and “moreover” —which would normally seperate longer sentences or clauses— and are poorly written/hard to read overall. The lead section doesn’t provide a concise overview of what institutions are, but delves into the specifics of how certain scholars approach the topic. While such quotations might be useful, in this case, they veer off into an argument over whether or not institutions constitute forms of behaviour. This is an issue better left to the rest of the article. Yaguzi (talk) 03:08, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
Government titles vS vehicle vin codeing
editWhat sticks.. 2600:1700:5B23:6240:B5D1:51F6:2694:D779 (talk) 20:54, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
"History of institutions" listed at Redirects for discussion
editAn editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect History of institutions and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 May 3#History of institutions until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 17:30, 3 May 2022 (UTC)