Talk:Dragon Ball Z: Ultimate Tenkaichi

The article's status

No, you're not using reliable sources. You're not really using anything at all. First off, the developer's interview you mentioned was conducted by the fansite Saiyan Island, and by proxy, fansites are unreliable sources. Any site that regurgitates such information and citing such a fansite is also unreliable. Secondly, you can't really verify anything from the game appearing at a convention or conference beyond that they were there. What was seen from the demonstration to be completed must be reported by a reliable news organization like IGN. Thirdly, sites like Namco Bandai can be used, but they tend to degrade over time. Plus there is an issue with primary sources. It would be beneficial if this were written by a reliable news site or journal from something that was going to stand the test of time. Mind you, that primary sources are not entirely off limits. If you need to know what reliable, then see here. Sarujo (talk) 11:03, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

even though the interview was from saiyan island, there is a video, in 4 parts, showing the interview taking place. I also checked on google what the developers looked like to see if it was fake and the developers in the video looked the same as the ones that i found online. Also i will admit that ign and gamespot are more reliable sources, they barely have any information on this game. So most of the information came from the answers that the developers during the 4 videos of the interview86.145.76.128 (talk) 14:03, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

I'm going to go on a limb and say that this comment was from Munem939. I'd advise you to try and stay logged in when editing and making comments. As editors will become suspicious of your actions. The article was just vandalized by another IP, and I had to double check to make sure if this wasn't yours. So please stay logged in.

All you done in that statement is given reasons why the interview is not reliable. Okay, the interview-es are the developers, but that doesn't excuse the fact that the interview was conducted by somebody with questionable journalistic integrity or the fact that this was hosted by a fansite. The only way this interview would be considered reliable, is if it were conducted and hosted by some news organization like IGN or Gamespot. Otherwise is just another fan interview. I mean come'on, if this truly were reliable, don't you think I'd be using it?

Yes, dependable outlets have been rather light with the coverage for this game. But hey, if they haven't been talking about these details, then it's not worth mentioning here. Sarujo (talk) 20:06, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

Boxart

Hey, let hold off until the other official boxart images have been revealed. As far as I know, the only one revealed is the European one. Sarujo (talk) 22:53, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

Sure I can wait. To be frankly honest, even though this is the 2nd preview of the cover art design by Namco Bandai, Im not convinced that the picture is not the final cover art (even though it looks more official and has the x-box 360 Logo)Munem939 (talk) 02:36, 11 August 2011 (UTC)

Just so you know, it would be best if a boxart image didn't feature a particular console when dealing with a multi-console game like this one. Sarujo (talk) 02:41, 11 August 2011 (UTC)

Gameplay

When i was looking through this Wikipedia Page, i noticed that there isn't anything about the actual gameplay or the experience and therefore I have added a little about the gameplay! If there is anything wrong about this or you find that anything should be added/deleted please let me know below! Thank you for your cooperation! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Patellier (talk • contribs) 14:50, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

I added the tags essay-like and game guide to the Gameplay section. I think the section needs to be rewritten so that it doesn't fall under What Wikipedia is not. We should try and rewrite it to be more inline with the Gameplay sections of other video game articles (the other DBZ games in particular). I'll try to find some time to gather sources.

50.125.66.180 (talk) 10:20, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Dragon Ball Z: Ultimate Tenkaichi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.funimation.com/rojas/blog/namco-bandai-games-launches-dragon-ball-z-ultimate-tenkaichi-this-october/221661
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111030022020/http://www.gamespot.com/ps3/action/dragon-ball-game-project-age-2011/review.html to http://www.gamespot.com/ps3/action/dragon-ball-game-project-age-2011/review.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:12, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

"Budokai Tenkaichi"

This game is not part of the Budokai Tenkaichi, and the only thing that seems to put it in with that series is its English title. The Japanese title and gameplay is completely different from the actual BT trilogy. If this is part of the BT series, then the BT series itself must be part of the original Budokai series. It isn't, and likewise, this isn't either. So I'm removing all references of it being part of the series. 2600:1700:4AC1:2B0:7574:7411:60C5:A4AA (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 23:01, 9 August 2020 (UTC)