Talk:Dinner by Heston Blumenthal
Latest comment: 1 month ago by AirshipJungleman29 in topic GA Reassessment
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Dinner by Heston Blumenthal article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
Dinner by Heston Blumenthal has been listed as one of the Agriculture, food and drink good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on March 14, 2012. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the restaurant Dinner by Heston Blumenthal serves fruit made of meat (pictured)? | |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA concerns
editI am concerned that this article does not meet the good article criteria anymore. Some of my concerns are listed below:
- The article has been minimally updated with post-2014 information. Has the restaurant retained its Michelin stars, or have there been changes? How has the menu changed? What are recent reception sources saying?
- There is some uncited text in the article.
Is anyone willing to update this article, or should it go to WP:GAR? Z1720 (talk) 17:03, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
GA Reassessment
editThe following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • • Most recent review
- Result: Kept. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 11:10, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
This article is missing post-2014 information. The article also has some uncited text. Z1720 (talk) 21:34, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
- Several citation needed tags, and shouldn't there be a History section? Hmm, doesn't seem up to par, unfortunately. ---Another Believer (Talk) 18:00, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- I think when the article was first promoted, the restaurant was so new that a History section would be too short. Now that the restaurant is over 10 years old, a History section should probably be there. Z1720 (talk) 19:02, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- Let me see what I can do. (CC) Tbhotch™ 00:51, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Z1720: I added more information and cited most of the unsourced text, which was formerly attributed to deprecated sources. (CC) Tbhotch™ 08:26, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- If Z1720's concerns are addressed, I'd support keeping GA status. Tbhotch has made improvements to the article and I think any remaining issues can be addressed over time and via the talk page. Delisting does not seem necessary. ---Another Believer (Talk) 14:00, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Z1720: I added more information and cited most of the unsourced text, which was formerly attributed to deprecated sources. (CC) Tbhotch™ 08:26, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Let me see what I can do. (CC) Tbhotch™ 00:51, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- Article looks good to me. I assume the restructuring banner is because of the edits made in response to this GAR, so hopefully it will be removed when this GAR is complete. Z1720 (talk) 19:11, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Z1720 Removed ---Another Believer (Talk) 22:05, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Article looks good to me. I assume the restructuring banner is because of the edits made in response to this GAR, so hopefully it will be removed when this GAR is complete. Z1720 (talk) 19:11, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- I think when the article was first promoted, the restaurant was so new that a History section would be too short. Now that the restaurant is over 10 years old, a History section should probably be there. Z1720 (talk) 19:02, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.