Talk:Dartmouth College fraternities and sororities

Latest comment: 4 months ago by AirshipJungleman29 in topic GA Reassessment
Former good articleDartmouth College fraternities and sororities was one of the Social sciences and society good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 13, 2007Good article nomineeListed
July 5, 2024Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article


NPOV

edit

The sections on every active house seem very much like they are written by members of said house, active or otherwise, with varying degrees of information provided about each house. I do not understand the relevance of including updates to the status of the bathroom renovations in Bones Gate, nor does it seem verifiable that the sisters of Kappa Delta have “one of the strongest sisterhoods on Dartmouth College campus.” 129.170.195.216 (talk) 21:58, 18 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 1 December 2023

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (non-admin closure) Kiwiz1338 (talk) 05:45, 8 December 2023 (UTC)Reply


Dartmouth College fraternities and sororitiesDartmouth College Greek organizations – This is technically a request for a reversion. I recognise that Rublamb gave this page its current name as (I'm assuming) part of the fraternities and sororities WikiProject, but this new name does sort of obscure the fact that Dartmouth houses three gender-inclusive Greek houses that do not refer to themselves as fraternities and sororities. The article itself uses "Greek organization" as an umbrella term quite liberally, anyway. CongealedBox (talk) 03:05, 1 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

  • oppose: The WikiProject Fraternities and Sororities have been working on standardizing article names within types. This article's name was changed as part of that process after a discussion of the preferred naming convention. (The other convention in use for this type of article is "XYZ College student organizations", used for articles that include organizations that do not fall under Greek life.) The short answer is that it is easier for Wikipedia users to find information if articles are named consistently. Because not all users are familiar with the term "Greek", that term sometimes causes confusion. As to your concerns, there is much variation in types of organizations across all campuses; this is not unique to Dartmouth College. For example, not all fraternities and sororities have Greek letter names and some women’s organizations call themselves fraternities. Gender-inclusive groups are becoming more common and are not unique to Dartmouth. You are correct that the article's content was not rewritten to reflect its new name, other than a change to its lede. This article addresses the issue through the use of sub-sections for fraternities, sororities, and gender-inclusive. This is clearly presented and should address any issues or confusion. Rublamb (talk) 12:28, 1 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
  • oppose - I think a high bar is set by the benefit of easy or consistent searchability for pages listing fraternity, sorority, and society chapters when these have consistent naming syntax. Searchability when looking for gender-inclusive groups isn't reduced by the current naming syntax (matching our standard), nor are these types of groups so common at Dartmouth that they make up more than a fraction among their GLO peers in comparison with otherwise single-gender groups. [Language updated since initial comment.] Jax MN (talk) 19:48, 1 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

GA Reassessment

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · WatchWatch article reassessment pageMost recent review
Result: Delisted. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 10:45, 5 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

This article, promoted to GA in 2007, seems to be a list. I think this should be delisted so that it can be reclassified as a list instead. The article also has a "updates needed" orange banner from December 2023. Z1720 (talk) 22:59, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.