Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Liverpool F.C.–Manchester United F.C. rivalry Honours Count sources

Liverpool F.C.–Manchester United F.C. rivalry Honours Count sources

The filing party (the editor who opened this request) will add the basic details for this dispute below.

Editors involved in this dispute

1. Chrisuae (talk · contribs) – filing party
2. Autonova (talk · contribs)
3. PeeJay2K3 (talk · contribs)

Articles affected by this dispute

1. Liverpool F.C.–Manchester United F.C. rivalry#Football rivalry (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Other attempts at resolving this dispute that you have attempted

• WP:DRN#Talk:Liverpool F.C.–Manchester United F.C. rivalry#Honours Count?

Issues to be mediated

What is this dispute about? What sections, sentences, or issues in the article(s) can you not agree on? If you are the editor who opened this request, list these issues to be mediated under "Primary issues". If you did not open this request, you can add additional issues to be mediated under "Additional issues". The issues to be mediated would be properly agreed upon later, if this request for mediation is accepted.

Primary issues (added by the filing party)

1. Should the list of honours won by the two clubs involved be sourced from FIFA, UEFA, the two clubs' official websites and some media sources or from the BBC as in the current article?
2. Should the second draft table suggested at WP:DRN#Talk:Liverpool F.C.–Manchester United F.C. rivalry#Honours Count? sourced from FIFA and the two clubs' official websites be used to replace the current table?
3. Should the explanatory paragraph below the table in this edit [1] discussing differences of opinion on the sources via in-text attribution be included under the draft table if this in accordance with WP:Reliable?

Additional issues (added by other parties)

• Additional issue 1
• Additional issue 2

Parties' agreement to mediation

If you are a named party, please sign below and indicate whether you agree or refuse to participate in mediation. Remember that all editors are obliged to resolve disputes about content through discussion, mediation, or other similar means. If you do not wish to participate in mediation, you must arrange another form of dispute resolution. Comments and questions should be made underneath the numbered list below, to avoid confusion.

1. Agree. Chrisuae (talk) 21:46, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
2. Agree. Autonova (talk) 19:57, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

Decision of the Mediation Committee

This section should only be edited by a mediator. The Mediation Committee's representative will indicate in due course whether the request is accepted (meaning a mediator will be assigned) or rejected (meaning you will have to try a different type of dispute resolution). If the mediator asks you a question in this section, you may edit here.

• Reject. In light of the failure of PeeJay2K3 to agree to mediation, fails to satisfy prerequisite to mediation #6, "Among the parties who have consented to mediation, every major viewpoint concerning the dispute is represented". For the Mediation Committee, TransporterMan (TALK) 01:01, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
  • @TransporterMan: Apologies for not agreeing to this earlier. I got the original notification while I was busy at work and then I never received another reminder. Is it too late now? – PeeJay 19:00, 16 August 2015 (UTC)