User talk:SiliconProphet/Archives/2021/June
This is an archive of past discussions with User:SiliconProphet. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hi — I came across this article, and noticed the large number of redlinks in the See also section and in the cats. Normally those aren't very useful, so I was going to delete them, but then it occurred to me that perhaps you're intending to fill them all, since you seem to be active in this subject area. Can you confirm either that this is your intention, or that you're happy for me to delete them? Thanks, --DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:32, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
- Yes I intend on filling them in the red linksSiliconProphet (talk) 07:36, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
- @DoubleGrazing: The rules on red-linked categories are different to red-linked articles. Per WP:REDNOT, you should never add a link to a category that does not exist. And just generally,you should have a read of Wikipedia:Categorization and have a look around the relevant part of the category hierarchy to understand how categories work - in particular you should never add categories in a language that is not English, and in general you should not capitalise every word. Le Deluge (talk) 13:39, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
- Hi @Le Deluge: thanks, but you're barking up the wrong tree — I didn't add those redlinks (cats or see alsos). Quite the opposite, I was going to delete them, precisely for the reasons you mention. Or if your point is that I should have said "must not use red cats" rather than "aren't very useful", then there you do have a point; I was trying to soften the message, probably unnecessarily. Thanks, --DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:47, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
- @DoubleGrazing: The rules on red-linked categories are different to red-linked articles. Per WP:REDNOT, you should never add a link to a category that does not exist. And just generally,you should have a read of Wikipedia:Categorization and have a look around the relevant part of the category hierarchy to understand how categories work - in particular you should never add categories in a language that is not English, and in general you should not capitalise every word. Le Deluge (talk) 13:39, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
Links to draft articles
Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to Sogdian-language Manichaean letter. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 11:29, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Kephalaia
Hello SiliconProphet,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Kephalaia for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Fragmented pages of Manichaen manuscripts moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Fragmented pages of Manichaen manuscripts, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Liz Read! Talk! 20:39, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 8
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
- Episodes from Mani's Missionary Work
- Birth of Mani
- added a link pointing to Dazaifu
- Leaf from a Manichaean book MIK III 4959
- added a link pointing to Belt
- Leaf from a Manichaean book MIK III 4979
- added a link pointing to Turkic
- Mani's Parents
- added a link pointing to English
- Mar Sisin
- added a link pointing to Enlightenment
- Master Ulug
- added a link pointing to Uyghur
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Shabuhragan into Seven Scriptures of Mani. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution
. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 10:07, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Cangan Stele
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Cangan Stele requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.sohu.com/a/165729040_361562. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. BEACHIDICAE🌊 14:00, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
June 2021
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 02:41, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
- Hello, SiliconProphet,
- It looks like in many of the articles you have published over the past few days, there are uncited claims that appear to be your own interpretation and description of art. Please know that this kind of material is more suitable for a blog or website while Wikipedia relies on reliable secondary sources to support claims, not our editor's points of view or interpretation. Unsourced material will often be removed.
- If you have questions about Wikipedia policies, I recommend visiting the Teahouse where you can find clarification from experienced editors. Liz Read! Talk! 02:44, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
Yishan, Cangnan County moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Yishan, Cangnan County, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Chief Minister (Talk) 04:00, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
Chixi moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Chixi, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Chief Minister (Talk) 04:01, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
Jinxiang, Zhejiang moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Jinxiang, Zhejiang, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Chief Minister (Talk) 04:07, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
Qiaodun moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Qiaodun, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Chief Minister (Talk) 04:08, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
Article Create
You do not want to create the same article as the main page. Draft first.Chief Minister (Talk) 04:11, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
Zaoxi moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Zaoxi, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Chief Minister (Talk) 04:25, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Yishan, Cangnan County has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
Bkissin (talk) 13:55, 9 June 2021 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: Jinxiang, Zhejiang has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
Bkissin (talk) 13:55, 9 June 2021 (UTC)Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Manichaean literature
A tag has been placed on Category:Manichaean literature indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 15:23, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Fanshan, Cangnan County has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
Bkissin (talk) 15:56, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
Hello SiliconProphet I have added projects China, Geography, to your article. You may wish to join them, check their to-do, and meet new people with interest in these topics. ( To reply click "edit" next to this section, and add your reply at the end. ) Cheers, --Gryllida (talk, e-mail) 03:29, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of The Great Song to Mani
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on The Great Song to Mani requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.manichaean.org/pdf/manichaean-psalms.pdf. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Mccapra (talk) 11:57, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Mihr (Manichaeism)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Mihr (Manichaeism) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.encyclopedia.com/environment/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/manichaeism-manichaeism-central-asia-and-china. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. S Philbrick(Talk) 01:24, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
- I've removed the WP:CSD#G12 notice based on what appears to be a substantial rewrite of this article. There may be additional copyright concerns raised in the future but this revision shows a clear attempt to summarize facts from sources. Thank you. You may also want to read about close paraphrasing if you're unfamiliar as there are possibly some remaining concerns in that regard. --N8 06:33, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Ways to improve Shad Ohrmazd
Hello, SiliconProphet,
Thank you for creating Shad Ohrmazd.
I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
This article says almost nothing about the topic. It is really about a religious schism, not a person. To support a biographical article we need multiple references with in depth coverage of the subject.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mccapra}}
. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Mccapra (talk) 07:34, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
This seems to be the case, I'm working on an article about the sect and might want to just redirect this person to the sect they founded in the future if we can't find better sources. SiliconProphet (talk) 07:50, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
See of Babylon (Manichaeism)
Can you please slow down and stop creating so many weird articles? You’ve been posting copyright violations, creating biography articles that aren’t about people, and now you’re creating multiple articles with the same content. We don’t want dozens of articles with near-identical content just so you can fill up your template. The article “See of Babylon” a. isn’t about the see of Babylon and b. contains the same content as Denawars. Please edit like you want to build an encyclopaedia, not like you want to win a bet. If you need help with anything please leave a message on my talk page. Mccapra (talk) 19:22, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
See of Babylon (Manichaeism) moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, See of Babylon (Manichaeism), is not suitable as written to remain published. You are re-using the same material in multiple articles, which is not acceptable. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 19:23, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 15
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- Leaf from a Manichaean book MIK III 4959
- added a link pointing to Belt
- Leaf from a Manichaean book MIK III 4979
- added a link pointing to Turkic
- Mar Sisin
- added a link pointing to Enlightenment
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:DT01 Cover.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:DT01 Cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:23, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: The Sun and Moon are Empty (June 22)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Sun and Moon are Empty and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:The Sun and Moon are Empty, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Hello, SiliconProphet!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 08:38, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
|
On Schlüsselfelder von Kirchensittenbach
Hello SiliconProphet, I've had a cursory look at the Schlüsselfelder von Kirchensittenbach article. I've noticed that the article does not use inline citations to provide references for its content. Per WP:V, all material published on Wikipedia must be traceable to its original source. This is frankly not the case in your article. Can I ask you to consider using inline citations in your future work on this project? Best, Modussiccandi (talk) 08:20, 29 June 2021 (UTC)