SamCordes
This is SamCordes's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
SamCordes, you are invited to the Teahouse!
editHi SamCordes! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:04, 26 May 2018 (UTC) |
Ways to improve 2007–2008 Israel Football League season
editHi, I'm Willsome429. SamCordes, thanks for creating 2007–2008 Israel Football League season!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add more reliable sources to the page, especially for the results tables and awards.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.
Willsome429 (say hey or see my edits!) 13:23, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
A page you started (Robert B. Sinclair) has been reviewed!
editThanks for creating Robert B. Sinclair, SamCordes!
Wikipedia editor Cwmhiraeth just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
In general, a well-written article, but be careful about close paraphrasing.
To reply, leave a comment on Cwmhiraeth's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
editHello, SamCordes. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:01, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:00, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Israel Football League Logo Updated 2018.jpg
editThanks for uploading File:Israel Football League Logo Updated 2018.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:28, 1 December 2018 (UTC)
Rollback granted
editHi SamCordes. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:
- Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
- Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
- Rollback should never be used to edit war.
- If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
- Use common sense.
If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Nakon 05:58, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
Long Beach Unified School District
editSamcordes, thank you so much for helping me to edit the LBUSD article. Keep in mind that I always try to make the Wikipedia project better! I never try to hurt it! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.65.90.61 (talk) 02:15, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
- No problem 69.65.90.61, and happy editing! SamCordes (talk) 04:16, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
Hello, SamCordes, and welcome to STiki! Thank you for your recent contributions using our tool. We at STiki hope you like using the tool and decide to continue using it in the future. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Here are some pages which are a little more fun:
We hope you enjoy maintaining Wikipedia with STiki! If you have any questions, problems, or suggestions don't hesitate to drop a note over at the STiki talk page and we'll be more than happy to help. Again, welcome, and thanks! West.andrew.g (talk) 05:54, 21 December 2018 (UTC) |
Note: Having a username change after you start using STiki will reset your classification count. Please let us know about such changes on the talk page page to avoid confusion in issuing milestone awards. You can also request for your previous STiki contributions to be reassigned to your new account name.
December 2018 blitz bling
editThe Working Wikipedian's Barnstar | ||
This barnstar is awarded to SamCordes for copy edits totaling over 4,000 words (including rollover words) during the GOCE December 2018 Copy Editing Blitz. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Reidgreg (talk) 18:06, 24 December 2018 (UTC) |
Thanks for all of your contributions and happy editing in the new year! – Reidgreg (talk) 18:06, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
- Thank you Reidgreg, and happy new year! SamCordes (talk) 22:30, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
Seasonal Greetings
editMerry Christmas and a Prosperous 2019! | |
Hello SamCordes, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2019. Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages. |
- Thank you Everedux! All the best to you as well! SamCordes (talk) 16:22, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
Monde Selection Revert
editThank you SamCordes for the kind note after revert my editing, it's very warm to know the revert reason, rather than deleting without any notice. You even provide me the guideline! I am the fresh man who are crazy at clean label trend and would like to focus the traditional cooking gourmet. Hopefully back to you soon once I finished all the reading :)
- No problem S1091300205, feel free to reach out anytime, and happy editing! SamCordes (talk) 17:39, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
DYK for Howard J. Green
editOn 4 January 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Howard J. Green, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Howard J. Green's screenplay for I Am a Fugitive from a Chain Gang led to the elimination of the chain gang system in the U.S. state of Georgia in 1937? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Howard J. Green. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Howard J. Green), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
DYK nomination of Seattle Totem Pole
editHello! Your submission of Seattle Totem Pole at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Cúchullain t/c 15:54, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
- Thank you for the review @Cuchullain:, I've addressed the first three issues and I'll try and refactor all the citations using WP:SRF to address the final concern. I'll let you know in the nomination entry when I've finished — hopefully today! Thank you again, SamCordes (talk) 18:08, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
A page you started (Freedom Football League) has been reviewed!
editThanks for creating Freedom Football League.
I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
The article as written has several citations in reliable sources, but their actual content is almost exclusively reprinting statements made by the league's founder. Thus, more citations are needed for verification.
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Rosguill}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
signed, Rosguill talk 22:54, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
- Thank you, I'll look into that when I get the chance. SamCordesTalk 23:10, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
January 2019 GOCE drive bling
editThe Minor Barnstar | ||
This barnstar is awarded to SamCordes for copy edits totaling between 1 and 3,999 words (including bonus and rollover words) during the GOCE January 2019 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Reidgreg (talk) 03:13, 4 February 2019 (UTC) |
- Thank you! SamCordesTalk 23:10, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
DYK for Pioneer Square totem pole
editOn 19 February 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Pioneer Square totem pole, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that members of the Seattle Chamber of Commerce stole the Pioneer Square totem pole from a Tlingit village in 1899 and gifted it to the City of Seattle? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Pioneer Square totem pole), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Your GA nomination of Pioneer Square totem pole
editHi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Pioneer Square totem pole you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Caeciliusinhorto -- Caeciliusinhorto (talk) 17:01, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Pioneer Square totem pole
editThe article Pioneer Square totem pole you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Pioneer Square totem pole for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Caeciliusinhorto -- Caeciliusinhorto (talk) 17:01, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
Women in Red
editHi there, SamCordes, and welcome to Women in Red. I see you have made a good start with your interesting article on Elizabeth Whitney Williams. I hope there will be many more. I see you have also written several articles on football. Perhaps you could contribute to WiR's focus on sports over the next two months. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 09:10, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
- @Ipigott: Thank you! I'll definitely look into sports for my next WiR article. Cheers! SamCordesTalk 01:42, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
your recent rollback on my edits
edit--Samiam5129 (talk) 20:34, 18 July 2019 (UTC)samiam
Hi this actually was my first edit and this is my first message so please correct/direct me if I am doing something the wrong way.
Please explain how you feel the article (sukkah) was better before my changes if most of what I corrected are well known (to most orthodox Jews) factual mistakes (see the Hebrew version) Would you like I show my sources? Thank you
- Hi @Samiam5129:, thanks for reaching out! Sorry for not providing a more detailed revert message, I'm happy to expand. Yes, you should be citing reliable sources when you add or change content and, upon reviewing your changes again, I may have been a bit harsh in reverting them as I was thinking it was perhaps too much detail and read better before. However, I can't claim to be an expert on Sukkahs and I'm not fluent in Hebrew in order to read the Hebrew article, but I'm assuming good faith on your part and I'm happy to review your changes again with cited sources and get the article to a state we're both happy with. Let me know if I can help in any way and welcome to Wikipedia! (also, be sure to add
~~~~
to the end of your message in order to sign your name, but other than that you did everything correct! :) -- SamCordesTalk 04:04, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
Hey there
editLol hey, I'm not really active anymore but received a notification that someone mentioned me. Enjoyed reading your self-intro. Glad you came back for more. :) · Andonic contact 21:30, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
@Andonic: Hey, thanks for reaching out! I'm glad to be back. It was fun digging through some old edits to try and put that little intro together. Thanks again! (and sorry for the joke edits way back then) SamCordesTalk 16:51, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
August 2019 at Women in Red
edit August 2019, Volume 5, Issue 7, Numbers 107, 108, 126, 129, 130, 131
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 06:46, 29 July 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
DYK for Charity Lamb
editOn 24 August 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Charity Lamb, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Charity Lamb was the first woman convicted of murder in the Oregon Territory? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Charity Lamb. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Charity Lamb), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
September 2019 at Women in Red
edit September 2019, Volume 5, Issue 9, Numbers 107, 108, 132, 133, 134, 135
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 16:25, 27 August 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Golden earring moontan
editHi,
you removed my change.
It's about this:
It contains the radio hit "Radar Love", and was voted best Dutch pop album ever by readers of music magazine Oor in 2008.
It's not true, it was voted as number 9: see -> https://oor.nl/news/oor_presenteert_50_jaar_nederpop_inclusief_de_50_beste_nederlandse_popalbums_aller_tijden/
The link you use gives an error so that's a bad reference.
So your statement is not true. Please accepts my changes. Or should I do it my self?
Thanks,
René — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rene.titulaer (talk • contribs) 05:19, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
- @Rene.titulaer: Thanks for reaching out. The source you provided is a good source so feel free to make your proposed change. Looking back at the edit in question, looks like I originally reverted the edit because you also included the text "guns" at the start of the article which I interpreted as a test/vandalism edit, but the rest of your edit looked fine. Thanks, -- SamCordestalk 19:03, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Gavrilo Princip
editHi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Gavrilo Princip you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Harrias -- Harrias (talk) 10:01, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Gavrilo Princip
editThe article Gavrilo Princip you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Gavrilo Princip for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Harrias -- Harrias (talk) 12:20, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Gavrilo Princip
editThe article Gavrilo Princip you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Gavrilo Princip for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Harrias -- Harrias (talk) 09:21, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
October Events from Women in Red
edit October 2019, Volume 5, Issue 10, Numbers 107, 108, 137, 138, 139, 140
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:36, 23 September 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Israeli american football 19-20
editCould you create the article IsraeliIdan (talk) 19:25, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
- @Zvikorn: Sorry for the delay in getting back to you, I just created the article: 2019–2020 Israel Football League season. Thanks, -- SamCordestalk 05:33, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
November 2019 at Women in Red
edit November 2019, Volume 5, Issue 11, Numbers 107, 108, 140, 141, 142, 143
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 22:59, 29 October 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Disambiguation link notification for November 11
editHi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Soapy Smith, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Confidence man (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:23, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
editDecember events with WIR
edit December 2019, Volume 5, Issue 12, Numbers 107, 108, 144, 145, 146, 147
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:44, 25 November 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Mineral Wells "Controversies" edits
editSam, Not sure how one is supposed to protest you guys supporting fabricated "information" but consider this a formal complaint having tried twice to correct the Controversy section and reduce the unnecessary damages already done. As in this case, it's pretty much impossible to find published articles to cite which are disputing the articles a nefarious newspaper editor published on hear-say of events which never happened. And most people wouldn't morph matters of personal preference into becoming "controversial community-wide issues" like sanctuary city thing trending, unless of course they wished to turn it into something to slander and injure someone's image over. But if a person happens to run a local newspaper and wishes to hurt someone, cranking out fake news articles with the right catch-phrases inserted, long enough or calling in a marker might get some other paper to print something to cite ... after all, since the anti-propaganda act of 1945 was repealed, much easier to sell lies than the truth. However a small town editor may get something to cite, it's good enough to spread fake news to Wikipedia and inflate the perception of credibility even more, no matter how much damage it causes individuals or entire communities, as it is doing in this case.
As I noticed the deception in progress and attempted to correct it, first by deleting, then by adding the facts which were omitted ... in reality. Articles to cite over events which never happened ... yeah right. There was never verifiable investigations initiated by either our county Sheriff nor by the Texas Rangers, nearly a year after the fact. The complaint/accusation was quickly rejected by the local Sheriff, who suggested the complainer's only recourse was to take it to the Texas Rangers instead. The local paper repeated the same type of garbage three times a week for months until it was obvious there was nothing to it, the same garbage Wikipedia now retains, Wikipedia is being used. The Controversial sections should be deleted, this is not the understood usage of the service Wikipedia stands for. You are letting this guy make a mockery out of it. We do have controversy here, but the local newspaper isn't publishing anything about that because it's chief editor along with his cronies are being served their defense summons as multiple federal suits are beginning next week. We have been prohibited by the federal court from providing sources. Sincerely, Joe Swirczynski POB 733 Mineral Wells, Tx 76068 westexjoe@nxlink.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by Keepingthetruth (talk • contribs) 00:02, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
- Hi @Keepingthetruth:, thank you for reaching out and providing additional context. All contributions to Wikipedia need to be verifiable and maintain a neutral point of view with no original research.
- I felt that your additions of
- "merely attempts being made by Mavid Day the editor of the Mineral Well Index to continue his vendetta against the Mayor with no regard towards the damage to the city's image Mavid Day repeatedly incurs. This is false news reporting at best."
- and
- "The dissenting votes can be attributed to the on-going attempts to remove the Mayor which have spawned a number of new civil lawsuits which are expected to result in criminal charges filed on the certain individuals for past participitation in violating statutes in both the US and Texas Constitutions"
- violated those principles. Feel free to add additional, cited information to the article in order to provide further context if you like, but all additions have to be cited and maintain a neutral point of view. Let me know if I can provide additional information, and I'm happy to help get the article to a state we're both happy with.
The Anti-Vandalism + STiki Barnstar
|
||
Congratulations, SamCordes! You're receiving this barnstar because you recently crossed the 1,000 classification threshold using STiki. We thank you both for your contributions to Wikipedia at-large and your use of the tool. We hope you continue your ascent up the leaderboard and stay in touch at the talk page. Thank you and keep up the good work! West.andrew.g (talk) 14:00, 2 December 2019 (UTC) |
- Thank you! -- SamCordestalk 16:47, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
Mineral Wells "Controversies" edits
editI am confused about what to do to get the edits expunged from the "Controversies" section. Perhaps just not including it. With the litigation currently in process I don't believe I have the liberty of citing any references at this time. Thank you.Keepingthetruth (talk) 19:31, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
- @Keepingthetruth: I'm not sure the content should be removed, and please look here for more info. I don't know all the particulars of the allegations, but if there is indeed open allegations against the mayor with litigation in process, then that seems suitable to include in a government controversies section. Prematurely dismissing the allegations and calling them "fake news" seems like speculation.
- However, if you'd like to get the input of additional editors, the Mineral Wells article has a talk page as well and I encourage you to post your reasoning there where perhaps a consensus can be formed.
January 2020 at Women in Red
edit January 2020, Volume 6, Issue 1, Numbers 146, 148, 149, 150, 151, 153
|
February with Women in Red
edit February 2020, Volume 6, Issue 2, Numbers 150, 151, 152, 154, 155
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 19:31, 28 January 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
March 2020 at Women in Red
edit March 2020, Volume 6, Issue 3, Numbers 150, 151, 156, 157, 158, 159
Online events:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 19:33, 23 February 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
April 2020 at Women in Red
edit April 2020, Volume 6, Issue 4, Numbers 150, 151, 159, 160, 161, 162
Online events:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 15:00, 23 March 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
May 2020 at Women in Red
edit May 2020, Volume 6, Issue 5, Numbers 150, 151, 163, 164, 165, 166
Online events:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 20:59, 29 April 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
June 2020 at Women in Red
editWomen in Red June 2020, Volume 6, Issue 6, Numbers 150, 151, 167, 168, 169
Online events:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 17:11, 25 May 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
DYK for City of Seattle (steamship)
editOn 31 May 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article City of Seattle (steamship), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the City of Seattle was built in Philadelphia? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/City of Seattle (steamship). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, City of Seattle (steamship)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
July 2020 at Women in Red
editWomen in Red / July 2020, Volume 6, Issue 7, Numbers 150, 151, 170, 171, 172, 173
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 16:12, 28 June 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
August 2020 at Women in Red
editWomen in Red | August 2020, Volume 6, Issue 8, Numbers 150, 151, 173, 174, 175
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 18:51, 26 July 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
September Women in Red edithons
editWomen in Red | September 2020, Volume 6, Issue 9, Numbers 150, 151, 176, 177
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:53, 29 August 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
October editathons from Women in Red
editWomen in Red | October 2020, Volume 6, Issue 10, Numbers 150, 173, 178, 179
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:11, 21 September 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
November edith-a-thons from Women in Red
editWomen in Red | November 2020, Volume 6, Issue 11, Numbers 150, 173, 178, 180, 181
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:50, 28 October 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
editDecember with Women in Red
editWomen in Red | December 2020, Volume 6, Issue 12, Numbers 150, 173, 178, 182, 183
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:41, 26 November 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
A New Year With Women in Red!
editWomen in Red | January 2021, Volume 7, Issue 1, Numbers 182, 184, 185, 186, 187, 188
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 03:02, 29 December 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
February 2021 at Women in Red
editWomen in Red | February 2021, Volume 7, Issue 2, Numbers 184, 186, 188, 189, 190, 191
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 15:00, 27 January 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
March 2021 at Women in Red
editWomen in Red | March 2021, Volume 7, Issue 3, Numbers 184, 186, 188, 192, 193
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 18:49, 26 February 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
April editathons from Women in Red
editWomen in Red | April 2021, Volume 7, Issue 4, Numbers 184, 188, 194, 195, 196
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 20:17, 22 March 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
May 2021 at Women in Red
editWomen in Red | May 2021, Volume 7, Issue 5, Numbers 184, 188, 197, 198
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 21:37, 28 April 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
June 2021 at Women in Red
editWomen in Red | June 2021, Volume 7, Issue 6, Numbers 184, 188, 196, 199, 200, 201
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 18:51, 28 May 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
July 2021 at Women in Red
editWomen in Red | July 2021, Volume 7, Issue 7, Numbers 184, 188, 202, 203, 204, 205
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 16:06, 22 June 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
August Editathons with Women in Red
editWomen in Red | August 2021, Volume 7, Issue 8, Numbers 184, 188, 204, 205, 206, 207
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:27, 23 July 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
September 2021 at Women in Red
editWomen in Red | September 2021, Volume 7, Issue 9, Numbers 184, 188, 204, 205, 207, 208
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 22:31, 26 August 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
October 2021 at Women in Red
editWomen in Red | October 2021, Volume 7, Issue 10, Numbers 184, 188, 209, 210, 211
Special event:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 01:37, 29 September 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
November 2021 at Women in Red
editWomen in Red | November 2021, Volume 7, Issue 11, Numbers 184, 188, 210, 212, 213
|
--Innisfree987 (talk) 21:32, 24 October 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
editDecember 2021 at Women in Red
editWomen in Red | December 2021, Volume 7, Issue 12, Numbers 184, 188, 210, 214, 215, 216
|
--Innisfree987 (talk) 00:13, 27 November 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
January 2022 Women in Red
editHappy New Year from Women in Red Jan 2022, Vol 8, Issue 1, Nos 214, 216, 217, 218, 219
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:03, 28 December 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
February with Women in Red
edit Women in Red Feb 2022, Vol 8, Issue 2, Nos 214, 217, 220, 221, 222
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:10, 31 January 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Kalamboli
editHello, this is Bharati, a resident of Kslamboli for the past trhee and half yrars.I have written after knowing the thruth.It is difficult to tell the source as the information is based on media reports and individual experiences.You please do not chane the ingormation that I gave, since that is going to improve the future of the node.Kindly let me write.I am not writing this to defame the place.People need help. The reports about the node kalamboli are true as info is given by local police, people and media reports.It looks that it is true but it is difficult to verify the facts. Navicitizen (talk) 06:17, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
- @Navicitizen Thank you for reaching out. I don't know your experiences in Kalamboli, and I am symphathetic, however Wikipedia requires reliable sources and no original research for all added content. If you can provide reliable sources, your contributions would be welcomed. -- SamCordestalk 06:33, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
March editathons
editWomen in Red Mar 2022, Vol 8, Issue 3, Nos 214, 217, 222, 223, 224, 225
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:38, 27 February 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
April Editathons from Women in Red
editWomen in Red Apr 2022, Vol 8, Issue 4, Nos 214, 217, 226, 227, 228
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:46, 22 March 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
May 2022 at Women in Red
editWomen in Red May 2022, Vol 8, Issue 5, Nos 214, 217, 227, 229, 230
|
--Innisfree987 (talk) 04:57, 2 May 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
June events from Women in Red
editWomen in Red June 2022, Vol 8, Issue 6, Nos 214, 217, 227, 231, 232, 233
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 09:22, 31 May 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red in July 2022
editWomen in Red July 2022, Vol 8, Issue 7, Nos 214, 217, 234, 235
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:49, 27 June 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red August 2022
editWomen in Red August 2022, Vol 8, Issue 8, Nos 214, 217, 236, 237, 238, 239
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 10:59, 29 July 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red in September 2022
editWomen in Red September 2022, Vol 8, Issue 9, Nos 214, 217, 240, 241
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:38, 31 August 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red October 2022
editWomen in Red October 2022, Vol 8, Issue 10, Nos 214, 217, 242, 243, 244
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:01, 29 September 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red November 2022
editWomen in Red November 2022, Vol 8, Issue 11, Nos 214, 217, 245, 246, 247
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 17:36, 26 October 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red in December 2022
editWomen in Red December 2022, Vol 8, Issue 12, Nos 214, 217, 248, 249, 250
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:57, 26 November 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
editHello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:40, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red January 2023
editHappy New Year from Women in Red | January 2023, Volume 9, Issue 1, Nos 250, 251, 252, 253, 254
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 18:04, 27 December 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red in February 2023
edit Women in Red Feb 2023, Vol 9, Iss 2, Nos 251, 252, 255, 256, 257, 259
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:29, 30 January 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red March 2023
edit Women in Red Mar 2023, Vol 9, Iss 3, Nos 251, 252, 258, 259, 260, 261
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 12:55, 26 February 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red April 2023
edit Women in Red Apr 2023, Vol 9, Iss 4, Nos 251, 252, 262, 263, 264, 265, 266
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:53, 27 March 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red May 2023
edit Women in Red May 2023, Vol 9, Iss 5, Nos 251, 252, 267, 268, 269, 270
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 18:29, 27 April 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red - June 2023
edit Women in Red June 2023, Vol 9, Iss 6, Nos 251, 252, 271, 272, 273
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 09:16, 28 May 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red July 2023
edit Women in Red June 2023, Vol 9, Iss 7, Nos 251, 252, 274, 275, 276
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:44, 27 June 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red 8th Anniversary
editWomen in Red 8th Anniversary | |
In July 2015 around 15.5% of the English Wikipedia's biographies were about women. As of July 2023, 19.61% of the English Wikipedia's biographies are about women. That's a lot of biographies created in the effort to close the gender gap. Happy 8th Anniversary! Join us for some virtual cake and add comments or memories and please keep on editing to close the gap! |
--Lajmmoore (talk) 11:02, 18 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red August 2023
edit Women in Red August 2023, Vol 9, Iss 8, Nos 251, 252, 277, 278, 279, 280
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 19:26, 28 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Orphaned non-free image File:Be'er Sheva Black Swarm Logo.png
editThanks for uploading File:Be'er Sheva Black Swarm Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:11, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
September 2023 at Women in Red
edit Women in Red September 2023, Vol 9, Iss 9, Nos 251, 252, 281, 282, 283
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Victuallers (talk) 16:59, 25 August 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red October 2023
edit Women in Red October 2023, Vol 9, Iss 10, Nos 251, 252, 284, 285, 286
See also
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 10:54, 29 September 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red - November 2023
edit Women in Red November 2023, Vol 9, Iss 11, Nos 251, 252, 287, 288, 289
See also Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 08:23, 26 October 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red December 2023
edit Women in Red December 2023, Vol 9, Iss 12, Nos 251, 252, 290, 291, 292
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:24, 27 November 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
editHello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red January 2024
editWomen in Red | January 2024, Volume 10, Issue 1, Numbers 291, 293, 294, 295, 296
Announcement
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:18, 28 December 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red February 2024
editWomen in Red | February 2024, Volume 10, Issue 2, Numbers 293, 294, 297, 298
Announcement
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:10, 28 January 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red March 2024
editWomen in Red | March 2024, Volume 10, Issue 3, Numbers 293, 294, 299, 300, 301
Announcements
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:23, 25 February 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red April 2024
editWomen in Red | April 2024, Volume 10, Issue 4, Numbers 293, 294, 302, 303, 304
Announcements
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 19:43, 30 March 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red May 2024
editWomen in Red | May 2024, Volume 10, Issue 5, Numbers 293, 294, 305, 306, 307
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 06:18, 28 April 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red June 2024
editWomen in Red | June 2024, Volume 10, Issue 6, Numbers 293, 294, 308, 309, 310
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 07:06, 23 May 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red August 2024
editWomen in Red | July 2024, Volume 10, Issue 7, Numbers 293, 294, 311, 312, 313
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 14:29, 30 June 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red August 2024
editWomen in Red | August 2024, Volume 10, Issue 8, Numbers 293, 294, 311, 313, 314, 315
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 19:59, 25 July 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
September 2024 at Women in Red
editWomen in Red | September 2024, Volume 10, Issue 9, Numbers 293, 294, 311, 316, 317
Online events:
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 19:03, 26 August 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red October 2024
editWomen in Red | October 2024, Volume 10, Issue 10, Numbers 293, 294, 318, 319, 320
Online events:
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 08:08, 29 September 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red November 2024
editWomen in Red | November 2024, Vol 10, Issue 11, Nos 293, 294, 321, 322, 323
Online events:
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:44, 29 October 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red December 2024
editWomen in Red | December 2024, Vol 10, Issue 12, Nos 293, 294, 324, 325
Online events:
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 18:46, 29 November 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging