March 2024

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Barry Greenstein have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see the Introduction to Wikipedia, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this message: Barry Greenstein was changed by PsychoticIncall (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.874832 on 2024-03-29T19:34:54+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:34, 29 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

April 2024

edit

  Hello, I'm ElENdElA. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Antonio Esfandiari, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ElENdElA (talk) 13:30, 23 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Hugo Pingray (CIO) for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hugo Pingray (CIO) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hugo Pingray (CIO) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

jlwoodwa (talk) 04:28, 21 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Alan Engel

edit
 

The article Alan Engel has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No real indication of notability, only sources are routine 'match reports' on poker news sites and a stats database. Doesn't meet WP:NBIO.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. UtherSRG (talk) 10:25, 11 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Robert Merulla

edit
 

The article Robert Merulla has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No real indication of notability, only sources are routine 'match reports' on poker news sites and a stats database. Doesn't meet WP:NBIO. -

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. UtherSRG (talk) 10:26, 11 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Joshua Reichard (poker player)

edit
 

The article Joshua Reichard (poker player) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No real indication of notability, only sources are routine 'match reports' on poker news sites and a stats database. Doesn't meet WP:NBIO. -

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. UtherSRG (talk) 10:27, 11 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Daniel Sepiol

edit
 

The article Daniel Sepiol has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No real indication of notability, only sources are routine 'match reports' on poker news sites and a stats database. Doesn't meet WP:NBIO. -

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. UtherSRG (talk) 10:27, 11 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Kyle Cartwright (poker player)

edit
 

The article Kyle Cartwright (poker player) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No real indication of notability, only sources are routine 'match reports' on poker news sites and a stats database. Doesn't meet WP:NBIO. -

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. UtherSRG (talk) 10:27, 11 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Jesse Sylvia

edit
 

The article Jesse Sylvia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No real indication of notability, only sources are routine 'match reports' on poker news sites and a stats database. Doesn't meet WP:NBIO. -

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. UtherSRG (talk) 10:27, 11 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Ari Engel for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ari Engel, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ari Engel until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 13 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Jesse Sylvia for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jesse Sylvia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jesse Sylvia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

UtherSRG (talk) 02:22, 13 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Daniel Sepiol for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Daniel Sepiol is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Sepiol until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

UtherSRG (talk) 12:21, 14 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Kyle Cartwright (poker player) for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kyle Cartwright (poker player) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kyle Cartwright (poker player) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

UtherSRG (talk) 13:05, 17 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2021 World Series of Poker, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jack Oliver. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 20:26, 12 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

August 2024

edit

  Hello. Your recent edits to Pollak and Aram (given name) appear to have added a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 17:50, 18 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Benjamin Pollak, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Main Event.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:54, 21 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Deletion discussion about Franco Spitale

edit

Hello PsychoticIncall, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Franco Spitale, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Franco Spitale.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|TheNuggeteer}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 06:00, 1 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Deletion discussion about Peter Park (poker player)

edit

Hello PsychoticIncall, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Peter Park (poker player), should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Park (poker player).

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Bastun}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 17:31, 2 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Deletion discussion about Thibault Perissat

edit

Hello, PsychoticIncall

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Bastun and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've asked for a discussion about the redirect Thibault Perissat, created by you. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 2 § Thibault Perissat.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Bastun}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 17:33, 2 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Deletion discussion about Super Turbo Bounty No-Limit Hold'em Freezeout

edit

Hello, PsychoticIncall

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Bastun and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've asked for a discussion about the redirect Super Turbo Bounty No-Limit Hold'em Freezeout, created by you. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 2 § Super Turbo Bounty No-Limit Hold'em Freezeout.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Bastun}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 17:34, 2 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Deletion discussion about Frank Funaro (poker player)

edit

Hello PsychoticIncall, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Frank Funaro (poker player), should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frank Funaro (poker player).

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Bastun}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 17:36, 2 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Deletion discussion about Millionaire Maker No-Limit Hold'em

edit

Hello, PsychoticIncall

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Bastun and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've asked for a discussion about the redirect Millionaire Maker No-Limit Hold'em, created by you. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 2 § Millionaire Maker No-Limit Hold'em.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Bastun}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 17:37, 2 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Deletion discussion about Jason Simon (poker player)

edit

Hello, PsychoticIncall

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Bastun and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've asked for a discussion about the redirect Jason Simon (poker player), created by you. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 2 § Jason Simon (poker player).

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Bastun}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 17:40, 2 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Deletion discussion about Stephen Winters

edit

Hello, PsychoticIncall

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Bastun and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've asked for a discussion about the redirect Stephen Winters, created by you. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 2 § Stephen Winters.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Bastun}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 17:40, 2 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Deletion discussion about Pedro Neves (poker player)

edit

Hello PsychoticIncall, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Pedro Neves (poker player), should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pedro Neves (poker player).

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Bastun}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 17:42, 2 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Deletion discussion about Santhosh Suvarna

edit

Hello PsychoticIncall, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Santhosh Suvarna, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Santhosh Suvarna.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Bastun}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 17:43, 2 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Deletion discussion about Mini Super Turbo Bounty Freezeout (Second Chance)

edit

Hello, PsychoticIncall

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Bastun and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've asked for a discussion about the redirect Mini Super Turbo Bounty Freezeout (Second Chance), created by you. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 2 § Mini Super Turbo Bounty Freezeout (Second Chance).

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Bastun}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 17:44, 2 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Deletion discussion about Mini Super Turbo Bounty Freezeout

edit

Hello, PsychoticIncall

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Bastun and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've asked for a discussion about the redirect Mini Super Turbo Bounty Freezeout, created by you. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 2 § Mini Super Turbo Bounty Freezeout.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Bastun}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 17:45, 2 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Deletion discussion about Monster Stack No-Limit Hold'em

edit

Hello, PsychoticIncall

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Bastun and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've asked for a discussion about the redirect Monster Stack No-Limit Hold'em, created by you. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 2 § Monster Stack No-Limit Hold'em.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Bastun}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 17:45, 2 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

September 2024 articles for deletion

edit

Hi. You have created many recent articles about poker players. Most of these seem to be about people who do not appear to meet our WP:GNG or WP:NPEOPLE guidelines for biogrpahies; they are mid-ranking players who don't appear to have won any major tournaments and don't have any significant coverage from independent reliable sources outside niche poker sites. I strongly suggest that rather than creating such articles straight into mainspace, you create them instead in draft space and use the WP:AFC procedure to have them checked. That will help pick up issues with the articles too, such as poor spelling and grammar - "...is best knowned for" is included in many of the above.

Likewise, redirects you create should be logical. Very, very few people are going to enter "Mini Super Turbo Bounty Freezeout" into the search bar, and fewer still would expect that to redirect to an article on one poker player. Regards, BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 17:55, 2 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Deletion discussion about Joshua Beckley

edit

Hello PsychoticIncall, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Joshua Beckley, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joshua Beckley.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Vanderwaalforces}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 12:58, 5 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Deletion discussion about Malo Latinois

edit

Hello PsychoticIncall, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Malo Latinois, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Malo Latinois.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Vanderwaalforces}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 12:58, 5 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Deletion discussion about Michael Duek

edit

Hello PsychoticIncall, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Michael Duek, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Duek.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Vanderwaalforces}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 13:00, 5 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Deletion discussion about Michael Dyer (poker player)

edit

Hello PsychoticIncall, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Michael Dyer (poker player), should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Dyer (poker player).

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Vanderwaalforces}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 13:02, 5 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Deletion discussion about Michael Ruane (poker player)

edit

Hello PsychoticIncall, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Michael Ruane (poker player), should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Ruane (poker player).

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Vanderwaalforces}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 13:02, 5 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Deletion discussion about Moon Kim (poker player)

edit

Hello PsychoticIncall, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Moon Kim (poker player), should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moon Kim (poker player).

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Vanderwaalforces}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 13:10, 5 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Deletion discussion about Neil Blumenfield

edit

Hello PsychoticIncall, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Neil Blumenfield, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neil Blumenfield.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Vanderwaalforces}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 13:10, 5 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Deletion discussion about Ruslan Prydryk

edit

Hello PsychoticIncall, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Ruslan Prydryk, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ruslan Prydryk.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Vanderwaalforces}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 13:12, 5 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Franco Spitale
added a link pointing to Main Event
Pedro Neves (poker player)
added a link pointing to Main Event

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:54, 7 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited $25,000 High Roller H.O.R.S.E., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Professional amateur.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 27 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Merge of $300 Gladiators of Poker No-Limit Hold'em into World Series of Poker

edit

I have merged the article because the Gladiators event lacks sufficient significant coverage in reliable sources. voorts (talk/contributions) 02:48, 2 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Santhosh Suvarna.jpg

edit
 

A tag has been placed on File:Santhosh Suvarna.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a file licensed as "for non-commercial use only", "no derivative use", "for Wikipedia use only", or "used with permission"; and it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:

  • state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
  • add the relevant copyright tag and if necessary, a complete fair use rationale.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Whpq (talk) 03:43, 2 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Replaceable non-free use File:Santhosh Suvarna.png

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Santhosh Suvarna.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file's talk page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. voorts (talk/contributions) 23:13, 2 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of $25,000 High Roller H.O.R.S.E. for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article $25,000 High Roller H.O.R.S.E. is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/$25,000 High Roller H.O.R.S.E. until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

voorts (talk/contributions) 23:36, 2 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started

edit

Hi PsychoticIncall. Thank you for your work on Martin Kabrhel. Another editor, Voorts, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

I see that you write your articles in a pretty formulaic, cookie cutter way. There's nothing wrong with that per se, but one issue with using basically only two sources (Poker News and The Hendon Mob) is that you end up missing important things about a person, such as that they were part of a cheating scandal just last year. I encourage you to search outside of the small universe of poker sources when you write articles.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Voorts}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

voorts (talk/contributions) 00:46, 3 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Voorts: I've added a note about the cheating allegations. Is it free to remove the notability template? His poker results speaks for themselves. PsychoticIncall (talk) 12:26, 3 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

I still haven't been able to find much significant coverage outside of the cheating allegations. Poker results don't establish notability. voorts (talk/contributions) 12:47, 3 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Martin Kabrhel for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Martin Kabrhel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martin Kabrhel until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

voorts (talk/contributions) 17:06, 5 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

License tagging for File:Simone Andrian.jpg

edit

Thanks for uploading File:Simone Andrian.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:30, 12 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Santosh Suvarna.png

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Santosh Suvarna.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:12, 16 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Non-free rationale for File:Santosh Suvarna.png

edit
 

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Santosh Suvarna.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:13, 16 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Santhosh Suvarna for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Santhosh Suvarna is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Santhosh Suvarna (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Ratnahastin (talk) 07:37, 16 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Replaceable non-free use File:Santosh Suvarna.png

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Santosh Suvarna.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file's talk page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 19:03, 19 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

November 2024

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Alex Foxen, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:31, 7 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jans Arends, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Flop.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:57, 8 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Dan Glimne
added a link pointing to ITM
Gus Hansen
added a link pointing to ITM
Viktor Blom
added a link pointing to ITM

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:52, 15 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 19 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started

edit

Hi PsychoticIncall. Thank you for your work on Leonard Maue. Another editor, MPGuy2824, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

not mentioned in the target page

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 14:23, 25 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Daniel Lowery for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Daniel Lowery is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Lowery (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

UtherSRG (talk) 03:04, 28 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Rodrigo Seiji for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rodrigo Seiji is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rodrigo Seiji until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

UtherSRG (talk) 18:59, 28 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Tom Hall (poker player) for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tom Hall (poker player) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tom Hall (poker player) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

UtherSRG (talk) 19:05, 28 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Ryan LaPlante for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ryan LaPlante is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ryan LaPlante until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

UtherSRG (talk) 19:05, 28 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Jans Arends for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jans Arends is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jans Arends until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

UtherSRG (talk) 19:06, 28 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Simone Andrian for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Simone Andrian is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Simone Andrian until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

UtherSRG (talk) 19:07, 28 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Anson Tsang for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anson Tsang is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anson Tsang until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

UtherSRG (talk) 19:08, 28 November 2024 (UTC)Reply