User talk:One/Archive 7

Before Archive 7: Archive 6
After Archive 7: Archive 8

Archive 1

←

Archive 5

Archive 6

Archive 7

Archive 8

Archive 9

Archive 10

These are the next fifty messages after Archive 6 that appeared on my user talk page. If you'd like to respond to any of these messages, please do so on my current talk page.

Uncyclopedia AfD

You removed the AfD for Uncyclopedia after less than a day of discussion. Please let the discussion continue for at least a week. It is unjust to those wishing to voice their opinion. Stexe 23:31, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

Deleted page....regards to 'not noteworthy'...

I read the guidelines as to what is noteworthy, and it appears that it a subject that has a large amount of professional publications and research. Nursing and it's subspecalties certaintly fall under this category, as it it a well established profession, with a long tradition of research and professional publications. As to not having it in the article, If you would let me know how you would like to see it worked in in other than references, I would appricate any advice that you have for me. Other than that, I did put into the talk page that it was an unfinished project, as it is a work that will take a little time. Please consider restoring the page, as I feel it would be a valuble contribution to Wikipedia, and also to the profession of nursing to allow for a more through public understanding of the critical care subspecality. Thank you for your time on this, and I look forward to having you assist me with the creation of this page. --LucasRN 10:49, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

RfB

Guten tag, 1ne! I have nominated you for bureaucratship; see Wikipedia:Requests for bureaucratship/1ne. Good luck! ★MESSEDROCKER★ 02:34, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

First off...

I stand by my statement. - Mailer Diablo 13:03, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

• I accept the apology. I'd appreciate it more if it were done earlier in the past. Just don't repeat anything similiar in future anywhere. - Best regards, Mailer Diablo 14:03, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

Your RfB

Don't know if you noticed, but I left a couple of questions for you at the bottom of your RfB, if you wouldn't mind taking a look. Thanks. --Majorly (Talk) 23:47, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

RfA thanks

I would like to express my appreciation of the time you spent considering my successful RfA. Thankyou Gnangarra 13:12, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

You're and admin?

So your saying that your 13 and an admin?? Weird.. I'm born in april and someone younger than me has over 6,000 edits.. --Ard0 19:15, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

On title template

That template is used to fake the software interface, by using CSS to alter parts of the apparent content that are not supposed to be editable. It's confusing - it makes it seem that your userpage is located in article space. I suggest you stop using it. --Improv 13:31, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

• My position on it is not changed - it is regretful that MfD went the way it did, and IMO such things should be removed on sight. I consider it poor judgement on your part to put your desire to look cool above the confusion allowing people to fake interface elements causes. --Improv 16:52, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

Shouldn't that be disabled in software then? If you think of it as a security hole, then obscurity isn't really going to help much anymore. :-P Kim Bruning 22:15, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

Perhaps we should disable the ability to hurt each other by removing everyone's arms at birth. There's still a use in trying to convince people to be sensible when they're not. It's not a security hole so much as it is rude. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Improv (talk • contribs)

How, exactly, is it rude? 1ne 23:31, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

As used on your userpage, it introduces confusion in users on whether they're on a Userpage or an article (especially users who don't have a location bar set to display). A reasonable person could land on your userpage and think it's an article, start to move it into userspace (or delete it) and then notice the inconsistency. Alternatively, new users might start to make pages in articlespace after seeing what you've done. At the very least, it makes it harder for users to tell where they are, and tells them that they can't trust the MediaWiki interface. This is rude. --Improv 00:05, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

The URL states where you are. I'd also appreciate if you stopped acting confrontational. 1ne 00:08, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

URL bars are only useful for technical users, and most people trust the software interface (which you undermine). Some browsers don't have a location bar to show the URL, and a lot of users have the location bar disabled if they don't use it. I'm being confrontational to confront you with problem behaviour. I'm not being impolite, simply direct. What you're doing hurts the project. --Improv 04:47, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

Let me look into it and find a solution. Danny 05:08, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

Title-modifying support

I wasn't going to send thank-you cards, but the emotional impact of hitting WP:100 (and doing so unanimously!) changed my mind. So I appreciate your confidence in me, and hope you'll let me know if I can do anything for you in the future. Cheers! -- nae'blis 22:47, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

My RfA

Oh, the humanity! I had my doubts about accepting a nomination for a second RfA, but even I couldn't have predicted the stir it caused as it drifted to the ground in flames! Still, it was as educational as ever. Thanks for your input; it will be on my mind as I continue to edit Wikipedia, and perhaps I will have earned your support if another nomination comes around. Kafziel Talk 14:56, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

RfA thanks

Thank you for voting in my RfA, I passed. I appreciate your input. Please keep an eye on me(if you want) to see if a screw up. HighInBC ^{(Need help? Ask me)} 16:41, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thanks for your support at my RfA. I've got a lot to learn, but your words of support mean a lot! Any advice is welcome as I learn to use the new tools, and as a fellow administrator, would be much appreciated! Thanks again, and forgive my use of this dorky message box :) -- Renesis (talk) 00:44, 30 November 2006 (UTC) P.S., I still don't see how you live without popups! :)

Vandalism

Some one has vandalized the link to Dick Cheney- anytime i click on it it just goes to the page "evil", and because i have little expirience here i don't know how to fix it- maybe you can 70.176.114.118 22:42, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

Your input is requested

Your input would be appreciated at this Request for Comments. Kelly Martin (talk) 17:16, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

What is your problem

What the hell is your problem. Why did you delete my page. I havent done anything to you and i wasnt harming anybody so stop being anal.

What is your problem

My page isnt a hoax as i am friends with the great connor partos who advised me to put up infomation on my career that almost happened, but as you are so evil you delete it. How dare you delete it befor telling me, this is an emotional issue for me, there may have been a joke on there but it was all real so give me my page back.

And by the way how am i making personal attacks at you if im expressing my dismay in your actions you little child. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mohammadali123456 (talk • contribs) 04:39, 8 December 2006

Concordia Newsletter

NEWSLETTER

Concordia is currently trying to relaunch. I, and all the members of the ex-council, wish to welcome new members to the group. We are a group who aim to promote remaining civil, in an environment where messages can easily be interpretated wrongly.

Help out now!

• Try and help people remain civil! Talk to them, and help them in any way possible. Do not be afraid to use the talk page.
• Give people the Civility Barnstar.
• Make and spread some Wikitokens so people know there are people to help if they want assistance.
• Add banners or logos to your userpage to show your support.
• Suggest some ideas! Add 'em to the talk page.

We are a community, so can only work though community contributions and support. It's the helping that counts.

Decision Making

The council expired one month ago, but due to the current position of the group the current council will remain until the position of the group can be assessed, and whether it would be sensible to keep Concordia going. For most decisions, however, it will be decided by all who choose to partake in discussions. I am trying to relaunch because of the vast amounts of new members we have received, demonstrating that the aims are supported.

If you wish to opt of of further talk-page communications, just let us know here.

- Ian¹³/t 20:29, 13 December 2006 (UTC). Kindly delivered by MiszaBot.

RE: User:Ewlyahoocom/WikiPorn

FYI your deletion has belatedly come under debate at AN. It seems to have been done without MfD- in fact it survived an MfD- and the creator is objecting. Thanks, CanadianCaesar Et tu, Brute? 09:55, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Fan death edit

Not sure what you meant by your comment that accompanied your edit to Fan death. To which photo are are referring? How is that proof or evidence ? Mumun 19:54, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

No, not sure yet...Please fill me in on how a photo of fans on sale at 전자랜드 Electroland proves that Fan death exists? Additionally, was it you who made the comments about uninformed westerners judging this or that? Why don't you post such comments on the talk page where it would be more noticeable. Perhaps someone will address your concern -- why imbed such accusations that you make in the text of the article, where fellow editors are not likely to look? :-) Mumun 20:04, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Merry Christmas

Merry Christmas and Happy New year 1ne i wish you great wealth and fun time in the coming year! --The Dwarf_King 14:21, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

Syrvæ (Survey)? Spam? now what?!

About the survey question on the Southern Hemisphere; lots of people call it spam, but really, it's not. If you thought it was spam, I'm sorry. I see on your user page that you are opposed to ads, but really, its not an ad, spam, etc. It's 100% survey, 0% other. AstroBoy 05:17, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

PS: I wonder why Wikipedia isn't called Wikipœdia.

Dave Gilbert (game designer) on deletion review

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Dave Gilbert (game designer). Since you closed the deletion discussion for (or speedy-deleted) this article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Andre (talk) 22:35, 24 December 2006 (UTC)

Freddie Kissoon on deletion review

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Freddie Kissoon. Since you closed the deletion discussion for (or speedy-deleted) this article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Denni ^talk 18:40, 25 December 2006 (UTC)

Brothers Past on deletion review

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Brothers Past. Since you closed the deletion discussion for (or speedy-deleted) this article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Milchama 22:27, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

George Pataki

Couldn't you wait until Pataki actually leaves office, before printing in 2007. Be patient, he's only got a few days left as Governor. Plus, I wasn't being sarcastic. You were crystal-balling that Pataki was going to serve out his entire third term. Again wait until the Governor-elect takes office. GoodDay 20:35, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

Slovenia Euro ITN item

It does not appear to me that the Euro article has been updated much to reflect the current event, so I'm not sure it belongs on ITN. The euro is mentioned down in on this day... so there's really no benefit to it being in ITN as well. -- tariqabjotu 02:17, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

HAPPY NEW YEAR

May you ★MESSEDROCKER★ 05:11, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

There's a new User:WikiFanatic

Wiki fanatic (talk · contribs) has changed his name to WikiFanatic (talk · contribs), thought you might want to know. Night Gyr (talk/Oy) 20:04, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

Hi, 1ne. I'm really sorry. It had completely slipped my mind that a while back you used to have this username. Had I remembered, I would have asked the user to contact you beforehand. Well, Raul654 has already remedied the situation, but in any case, sorry for the inconvenience. Cheers, Redux 13:03, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

template:NMGovernors

I noticed you deleted this template with the claim that it had passed deletion via TFD. I could not find the deletion you were talking about, since it did not link to the article (as a TFD should). There was a TFD in August 2005, but it ended with a "keep". I restored the template, but if there was a deletion vote on this template that I missed, let me know. Also, in the future, please provide a link to the deletion decision in your deletion commentary box so there won't be any confusion. --tomf688 (talk - email) 04:54, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

No no no. Here is what the person on the talk page said, and I'll even bold the important point: "I'm not going to delete a template used in a large number of pages, so someone else can listyfy it and then re-list the template for deletion if they wish." It does not say that it should be deleted, but that someone can renominate it for deletion at a later date. Did you read the vote? Only three people voted to listify/delete while two others voted to keep. That's hardly consensus to have the template deleted, so it shouldn't be. Besides, every other state has their own governor's template and no others have been deleted as far as I can tell. --tomf688 (talk - email) 05:06, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

Nevertheless, the "survey" in question is over a year old and whether or not a rough consensus was reached is highly questionable. If this is such a major concern, re-nominate it for deletion. It should be noted, though, that every other state has one of these templates, so it may be necessary to nominate them for deletion as well. --tomf688 (talk - email) 05:22, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

Denver 2008

Denver has won the bid for the 2008 Democratic National Convention! I wanted to thank you for hosting the WFD2008 userbox personally and for your help in general with this project of mine here at Wikipedia. Without your help, I wouldn't have been able to get this collaborated effort as well organized as I did. Thanks for your support! Editor19841 (talk) 19:30, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

sAnItY cHeCk

Regarding AFD at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shawn Hornbeck... Could you look over my comments and check for AGF and NPA compliance... There have been a couple of accusations of bad faith, I need a third eye to tell me if I look like I'm assuming bad faith. I appreciate in advance the sanity check. Regards, Navou ^banter 05:26, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for January 15th, 2007.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery

Volume 3, Issue 3	15 January 2007	About the Signpost

Special: 2006 in Review, Part II	New arbitrators interviewed
Cascading protection feature added	WikiWorld comic: "Apples and Oranges"
News and notes: Fundraiser breaks $1,000,000, milestones	Wikipedia in the News
Features and admins	Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:34, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

Re: "No lowercase on talk pages!", eh?

Policy? It is called "common sense". Just check some of the articles using the template, and count how many talk pages are using it. I give you a hint: 50 pages out of 2700. -- ReyBrujo 03:59, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

As I said, it is common sense, something people should use more often. I could ask you to show me where there is a policy that states the talk page should have the same name as the main space page, but I do not wikilawyer around. -- ReyBrujo 04:10, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

Regarding RPA

I was not enforcing policy, however, read the essay. Its informative, and I did it to keep the flow of discussion. Please talk to me before reverting my edits to make a point. Forgive me if I've mis-intrepeted. Regards, Navou ^banter 04:48, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

I see your viewpoint. Agreed. Navou ^banter 05:23, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

Unblock

Hi, I lifted your block of 63.135.130.226, which you stated was for blankings on Steve Kagen. As far as I could tell, the IP has never blanked the article, although there does appear to be a content dispute. That's not surprising, since there's a fairly recent incident that has gotten heavy play online. So your semi-protection of the article seems appropriate to me, but I couldn't see any justification for a block, especially since no warnings had been given. There wasn't even a three-revert rule violation, so a block, particularly of one week, seemed rather excessive under the circumstances. --Michael Snow 07:13, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

I tried to put the Injun comment back on the Kagen site, but I was disallowed from doing so. However, the corrections to the White House comments were footnoted, and should have stayed. What is being posted reads like a Republican blog about Kagen, and accurate statements I had placed about the Oneida's nonreaction which were clearly stated in the article being cited were deleted. The postings are portraying Kagen is a unfavor negative light. Kagen denied making the comments, and the story was unsubstantiated. If mentions were made about his co-sponsored prescription drug plan passing Congress this week had been mentioned, the the article might have some degree of balance. See listed on Wisconsin Politics addressing the issue. http://plaistedwrites.blogspot.com/2007/01/steve-kagen-right-wing-punching-bag.html

I would like to see the page taken down until the issue is resolved as a matter of fairness and accuracy. Wikipedia is not suppose to be a defacto republican blog.

Jimdog

Why are you deleting the Jimdog. It was a funny picture I made of him, Jimbo himself dosnt mind. Please see User:Jimbo Wales/Funny pictures. Cheers. Culverin? ^Talk 10:55, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

He created the page and has a link to it from his user page dosnt he? Also thank you for telling me the image was up for deletion. Cheers. Culverin? ^Talk 11:22, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

Steve Kagen

I read your comment that it isn't a "Republican" blog. In retrospect there were a couple of sentences I should have not posted, but you deleted the entire Green Bay Press-Gazette article, which had you read the article provided a more complete discussion of the issue, which is the point of an encyclopedia. It also interestingly showed the Press-Gazette's definition of civility, although that was a comment that I shouldn't have posted.

No mention of Kagen co-sponsoring the Medicare prescription drug plan passing Congress, no quote of the actual article that the White House story first appeared in, no quote of Wisconsin Politics coverage of the issue, etc.

Once again, if the link can't provide fair, balanced, and complete coverage, the link needs to come down. We need to take this to arbitration.

help

help

Hi, i need your help

One of your admin, Doc glasgow , is threatening me and blocking my account. We have a dispute in the definition on living persion.

Please contact me for more information.

Thanks

Senatorto

Newyorkbrad's RfA

Thank you for your support on my RfA, which closed favorably this morning, as well as for your kind comments accompanying your !vote. I appreciate the confidence the community has placed in me and am looking forward to my new responsibilities. Please let me know if ever you have any comments or suggestions, especially as I am learning how to use the tools. Best regards, Newyorkbrad 20:53, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for January 22nd, 2007.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery

Volume 3, Issue 4	22 January 2007	About the Signpost

Wikipedia modifies handling of "nofollow" tag	WikiWorld comic: "Truthiness"
News and notes: Talk page template, milestones	Wikipedia in the News
Features and admins	The Report on Lengthy Litigation

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:13, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a deletion review of And The World Goes 'Round. Since you closed the deletion discussion for (or speedy-deleted) this article, you might want to participate in the deletion review.

I discovered an article about this Kander and Ebb revue had existed and was deleted, which I found quite surprising, only after I created it today. Please see my comments re: why this topic is notable and warrants an article. Thank you! SFTVLGUY2 15:16, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

UW disambig page

Hey - I don't know if you noticed, but there is a new discussion over at University of Wisconsin (disambiguation) and I know you were fairly vocal the last time it came around. Just a heads up. Cheers, PaddyM 00:12, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Jehu Eyre

Hi. I'm a relatively new contributer to Wikipedia, and recently stumbled across an article that interested me about the Revolutionary War. I looked up more sources on the subject and posted them, along with the facts stated in those sources. The article is now tagged as a possible hoax, and I am searching for objective analysis of it from multiple users. If you could please take a look, and urge others to take a look as well, I'd be very grateful.

SwedishConqueror 20:51, 25 January 2007 (UTC)SwedishConqueror

Very good

		The Original Barnstar
		A barnstar for thee for all your work for the little people I like calling politickers. You sure can keep articles update! Keep up the good work! Speaking of which, I need to actually do work instead of tossing about barnstars like shurikens! Enjoy! ★MESSEDROCKER★ 05:55, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

AirTran

Because there is only one sentence about the proposed merger of AirTran and Midwest and in that sentence it says that Midwest has rejected the offer. I don't have a problem with the "current related template" if there is more than one sentence about the issue in the article but as it stands now, I see no need in it Sox23 23:40, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

You should add something about AirTran taking Midwest to court in the article and then add the template back in: that would make the article "current related" Sox23 21:34, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Midway Airport vote

Hi 1ne, thanks for voting on the talk page of Midway Airport. Would you also vote for your choice on the 2nd poll on the bottom of the discussion page. Thanks Sox23 21:34, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

could you...

please delete the page Ohio State Law? My brother put it up under my name to mess with me... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Rahrahgoteam (talk • contribs) 16:40, 30 January 2007 (UTC).

Signpost updated for January 29th, 2007.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery

Volume 3, Issue 5	29 January 2007	About the Signpost

Foundation names advisory board, new hires	Court decisions citing Wikipedia proliferate
Microsoft approach to improving articles opens can of worms	WikiWorld comic: "Hyperthymesia"
News and notes: Investigation board deprecated, milestones	Features and admins
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News	The Report on Lengthy Litigation

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 17:13, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

Vandalism help

Hello,

I see that you are also active in the Spanish wikipedia. I have been assisting with the English Don Quixote project recently. I have a complaint about some vandalism there, and do not know how to handle that. Please advise.

There are two recent instances of vandalism that is also borderline obscenity/hate activity. Kindly review the recent (Jan 28-30 of 2007) diffs to see these.

RSVP

Thanks, Ricardo Hoegg. 70.16.29.245 15:30, 31 January 2007 (UTC)